Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tiger Woods, Tony Romo Grouped Together At Pebble Beach

2009 Rule Changes and Points of Emphasis

This is my first fanpost and, fair warning, it's a long one.

Earlier this week I had an opportunity to attend a presentation by Mike Pereira, the NFL's Vice President of Officiating, on rule changes and points of emphasis for the coming season, and I thought some of the BTSC readers would be interested in what's new for this season.

I've seen Pereira give this presentation prior to each season for a number of years and I could hardly be more impressed by him. He is truly dedicated to making sure the NFL product is fair and hard-hitting, but also as safe as possible for the players. NFL officials take a lot of knocks from fans, and Pereira would be the first to admit that they don't get every call right, but I'm convinced that if any fan could spend just a half-hour with Mike they would be blown away by his intelligence and his commitment. He has been a great asset to the league and he'll leave huge shoes to fill when he retires after this season. 

Star-divide

Of most interest to Steeler fans is that offensive holding will be a point of emphasis this year. The rule itself has not changed but officials are being instructed to enforce the rule more vigilantly. You may not be aware that over the last three seasons holding penalties have dropped to a 20-year low. Coincidentally or not, in the season following Super Bowl XL and the famous (and correct) holding call on Sean Locklear holding penalties dropped by about 35% and have stayed at that level ever since. Last year an average of barely over one holding penalty was called per team per game. Obviously this point of emphasis has huge implications for the Steelers and I would suggest for Silverback and Woodley specifically it's incredibly good news. I predict we will see at least a 20% increase in holding penalties this year. 

Most of the rule changes this year have been made with player safety in mind. As many of you probably know, blindside blocks to the head or neck are now illegal. This rule is obviously in response to the play last year in which Ward laid out Keith Rivers of the Bengals, and in fact Pereira showed video of that play specifically to make his point. Ward has argued that the change will only lead to players going lower and causing more knee injuries, which is a valid point but the league's position seems to be that they'll accept that as the lesser of two risks.

The hit that knocked Tom Brady out for the year is now illegal, though Pereira took pains to note for what must be the millionth time that it was legal last year. If a defensive player is knocked to the ground and they then lunge at the quarterback, they must either hit him above the knee or swipe at him below the knee. Helmet or shoulder contact below the knee is a penalty. The new rule specifies that it applies to the "passer" so that it also covers running backs throwing out of the Wildcat or on a gadget play.

Bunch formations are now illegal on kickoffs and wedges of more than two players are illegal on kickoff returns, both of which seem like good common sense rules to me. Pereira showed some video of return team guys just getting leveled by bunch formations. They were sitting ducks and had this rule not been changed it was just a matter of time until a player would have been paralyzed on exactly this kind of play.

It's also now illegal to hit a defenseless receiver in the head or neck by leading with your helmet, forearm, or shoulder. Pereira showed video of a series of crushing hits that are now illegal, though tellingly Ryan Clark's demolition of Wes Welker was not among them.

In what I think is an excellent change, a kicking team that is penalized when attempting an onside kick will not be allowed to re-kick. The receiving team will take possession at the out of bounds spot or the spot of the foul. Good move as the old rule effectively rewarded failure by giving teams a second chance to try an onside kick.

Lastly, in a needed response to last year's Week 2 Denver-San Diego debacle, a pass attempt/fumble that is ruled an incomplete pass is now reviewable. Also, on a loose ball that is ruled to have gone out of bounds, the out of bounds ruling is now reviewable. You may remember that in last year's NFC Championship Game there was a kickoff on which the kicking team appeared to recover a loose ball in bounds, but the ball had already been ruled out of bounds and the ruling was not reviewable.

Pereira also handed out a book with many interesting statistics on officiating, including a table showing the total number of penalties called every season since 1990. Notably, penalties per game were at their highest in 2005, then dropped sharply after Super Bowl XL, perhaps reflecting a concern that officials were taking over the game. Last year only 13.25 penalties were called per game, the lowest average in at least two decades. NFL fans are enjoying more penalty-free football and the games are being decided by the players and not the zebras. Good news for everyone.

Comment 26 comments  |  12 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks. Rec'd

Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile - Albert Einstein.

by fanofsteel on Aug 20, 2009 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

Nice simple review. Thanks!

by Varmint on Aug 20, 2009 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

good stuff

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by Frank Mineo (DYMS) on Aug 20, 2009 4:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah holding!

Ref’s can influence the game a couple of ways, calling too many penalties and ruining the flow of the game and not letting the players play, but also they can ruin a game by not calling penalties and allowing teams to get away with cheap illegal tactics that allow them to get away with not being good enough to win fairly, or like the old NBA hand-checking years, the game can reduce into thuggery.

The balance is hard to keep, and that’s why we need good men who care about the game enforcing and altering the rules and humans on the field interpreting the game.

by Phantaskippy on Aug 20, 2009 5:11 PM EDT reply actions  

the question for me is

will the holding changes help or hurt the steelers more? Because one can defnitely imagine Woodley/Harrison causing a lot of yellow flags to get tossed. But one can also imagine Max Starks and Willie Colon grabbing a few jerseys when they’re caught out of position. We will see…

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
--George Orwell

by jackmca on Aug 24, 2009 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully the Steelers really do get a huge Ref advantage, one that involves a big double standard on holding. That would really help.

by Phantaskippy on Aug 27, 2009 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kudos

Congrats on a successful 1st Fanpost! Great stuff

by bigz38fan on Aug 20, 2009 6:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Huzzah! Nice first.

About the wedge rule….Does this eliminate the need for wedge-busters-or redefine their role?

Who knew?

by Concomitandt on Aug 21, 2009 12:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Two-Man Wedge

A two-man wedge is still legal. It’s also legal to set up TWO two-man wedges, provided they’re separated by at least two yards. So while I can’t say for certain I suspect we’ll still see wedge-busters.

by Steelers in XLIV on Aug 21, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow.

Recommended on your first post. Send more.

Who knew?

by Concomitandt on Aug 21, 2009 6:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Informative post

Nice coverage of the new rules and an excellent post. I like the way Perreira has made himself accessible to the public and will openly defend and explain calls that are right (as in Santonio’s goal-line TD catch vs. Baltimore) or admit that the wrong call was made. Seems like a stand-up guy.

It remains to be seen if the stricter adherence to holding penalties will help the Steelers. As much as Harrison and to a lesser extent Woodley will benefit by more stringent adherence to holding calls, I’m afraid we have about five offensive linemen who would get hurt by it, first and foremost being the so-called best RT in the NFL. The fact holding penalties have gone down to record lows in an era when defenses and especially pass-rushing linebackers are faster than ever is counter-intuitive. Bottom line is the NFL does not want its game bogged down by 10 holding penalties a game. OL can hold all they want as long as the hands are inside the framework of the pads and referees will not call it even when both hands slide around to the outside of the shoulder pads, as long as the OL has the defensive player in front of him. Referees don’t like penalizing offensive linemen for Harrison’s short stature. They can basically still grab Harrison by the neck as long as he isn’t already past them when they do it.

As for the new wedge-blocking rules, it’s going to end up being very similar to what’s always happened. Two-man wedges will start a few yards apart but they are not going to leave a seam wide open for a tackler to run through. Those groups of two will merge between the hashmarks as lanes break down and tacklers try to split the seams to hammer the return man. If blockers don’t converge to block that lane, then you’re going to see a few returners taken to hospital this year. A guy who used to be a wedge-buster is going to love being on a highlight film for busting up a returner.

The so-called Hines Ward rule could end up being counter-productive. As Hines has said, the inevitable result will be that some blockers will go much lower than the ideal hit into the chest or shoulder pads and take out a guy at the knees. The other part of this is that many special teamers are rookies who haven’t learned to keep their heads on a swivel, as was the case with Rivers last year. If a rookie now thinks there’s a rule to protect him from blind-side hits, then he’s going to be even less interested in taking responsibility for his own safety. That’s when he’s going to get hammered, knocked ass over tea-kettle and land on his head.

Rules intended to promote safety are great and I know Perreira and others have put a lot of thought into them. But in a lot of cases it seems like an over-zealous campaign to save players from their own mistakes.

by steeler.lifer on Aug 22, 2009 7:26 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I was thinking the same thing about our line

If the league goes up 20% in holding, we might go up 30% to offset a team like the Giants going up 10%. That’s not good….Also, I really hope that Silverback has worked on some kind of counter move that would negate the arm-bar that offensive lineman have used to keep him off the quarterback. They just stick out their left arm around Harrison’s neck and it’s legal. He’s got to master some move that would chop that arm off or we’ll see much of the same this year. Not that much of the same is bad – 16 sacks is outstanding, but how many times did we see that arm-bar stop him last year? Too many times…

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Aug 27, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is it legal for him to use his leverage and basically flip the tackles over his back into the QBs? Let’s get Harrison taking some Judo. I’d like to see Tom Brady’s face when Deebo his hurling Matt Light at his face.

by Chicago Steeler on Aug 28, 2009 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

On Holding Penalties.....

While it may be great for Harrison and Woodley that they plan to call more holding penalties, I think it probably be a wash for the Steelers. Our OL is weak at best, and I am sure if the refs are going to focus more on calling penalties, or evening out penalties called during a game, our OL will get flagged just as much as our D benefits from them.

by imike29 on Aug 23, 2009 9:43 AM EDT reply actions  

good thing for you

that Roethlisberger is probably one of the best QBs at converting on 3rd-and-long. I don’t have the numbers in front of me, but as a Ravens fan, I noticed his ability to do that and it was maddening.

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
--George Orwell

by jackmca on Aug 24, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

great info

thanks for keeping us informed

by t1mmy10 on Aug 23, 2009 11:12 PM EDT reply actions  

very informative

especially the bit about the onside kicks. great rule change.

now if they could only get overtime right…

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
--George Orwell

by jackmca on Aug 24, 2009 2:54 PM EDT reply actions  

rules changes for 2010: All players must now wear tutus

we’ll all be watching flag football in only a matter of time.

otherwise, thank you for the post!! it was very infomative!!

by steelersgrl on Aug 27, 2009 2:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Great post. Like others, wonder how the holding will affect the Steelers. The OL, especially Colon, could be called for lots more holding penalties. While not a fan of Trai, he is better than Stapleton and should not be called for as many holding penalties.

I wonder, how a 330 lb DT is supposed to get up off the ground before tackling a QB or to stop rolling forward. The rule defies the laws of physics. As Lambert said, “put skirts on the QB’s”.

The Heinz Ward just sucks. If you are on the field, keep your head up. If you can not pay attention to what is going on around you, don’t play the game. Deliberate headhunter was outlawed in the 70’s, but hard hitting has always been allowed. If you can’t hit, play flag football.

by Steeler Nation VA on Aug 29, 2009 10:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah that is bullshit from the Bernard Pollard thing

Given the fact that it usually only takes 3 seconds for the rushers to get to the QB, that means the ball will likely get gone by the time the fat DT gets off the ground. Its just such garbage.

So now our lineman have to pretend to be cats and swipe at the QB’s legs… so stupid. I know for sure this penalty is going to decide a game. It could be a friggin 30 yard swing, instead of -15 and loss of down from the sack, its going to be auto 1st down +15 yards.

And 15 yards as it is, is too much for some of these fouls.

by Mechem on Aug 29, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Letter to Hines Ward
Franco72_small
The Last Sunday
Small
Joe Greene on Steelers Offense Under BA
Small
Homer reps BTSC and Steeler Nation on Washington Post Front Page
Small
Your Super Bowl Hate Guide

Recent FanPosts

Small
My Top 14 Steelers FA Targets
178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small
Bowling for Super Bowl
Small
6 Round NFL Mock Draft
Small
My Top 11 3rd Round Prospects
Small
My Top 11 2nd Round Prospects
Small
Who are your Top 5 Steelers of all time?
Steel-ball-logo-poster_small
Knowing Your Guards: A look at the 2012 Prospects (Updated 2/11/12)
Rodthreerivers_small
Report: Steelers Don't Want Ward
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2008 Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Stogs_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo