Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Spencer Hall's Sports Meme Power Rankings

The problem(s) with the running game

Really solid insight from Steelerbuddha as usual.  Many have already seen this but it is good reading for a Monday Morning. (DYM)

The first step on the road to recovery is admitting that you have a problem.  

The second step is to come to believe that a power greater than yourself, Isaac Redman understanding your problem can help restore you to sanity.

In this post I will try analyze the problems facing the Steelers running game. I will use a video posted on Postgameheros, that shows the four running plays featuring Frank Summers.  

I don't have simple answers.  I don't think any exist. The only positive thing that I can say, is that while the problems were numerous, they strike me as fixable. 

On to the video.

I recommend watching each of the plays a couple times, while using the pause button, to get a sense of what is going on.

I was going to copy stills of the plays and post them in my analysis, but even my procrastination has limits.  

Star-divide

A Thursday Night With Frank Summers from Dagger on Vimeo.

 

Play 1.  First Quarter.  2nd and 5.  Running Back: Willie Parker Full Back: Frank Summers

Problem 1 - Titans have 9 in the box:  Holmes is in single coverage with the safety cheating in before the snap.This gives me hope that the Titans were over-committing on the run. This strikes me as a fixable or exploitable problem. 

Problem 2 -Kemo trips over his own feet:  I had to watch this a couple times to beleive my eyes. Kemo just trips over himself while trying to pull. He not only takes himself out of the play but forces Parker back a couple yards.  It is his man that ultimately makes the play. This is fixable, but it just makes you shake your head. Everyone makes mistakes. Even Hines Ward. Kemo makes too many. 

Problem 3 - Frank the Tank - Whiff's on the DB:   This is the Steelers bread and butter play. It's quite similiar to the 75 yard TD parker had in the superbowl. Pause the video at about 19 seconds. If Tank sustains his block, Willie should be able to beat the one guy coming at him.  The Safety is 15 yards off at that point. Willie could pick up anywhwere between 10 and 60. This problem is also fixable. You just need to bring Dan Krieder out of retirement have Tank mature a bit and make that play. 

The good news: Matt Spaeth - makes a hell of block (no seriously). Heath Miller does just enough to keep his guy out of the lane and not get called for holding. Colon and Essex get great push.  

Prognosis:  This play is on Summers and Kemo. If they do their job Parker has room to make magic. Wether Parker is still capable of making said magic remains to be seen. 

Play 2:  1st Quarter - 1st and 10 Ball at the Tennesse 30.  Running back Willie Parker. Full Backs David Johnson and Frank Summers.  

This is kind of an odd formation, that Arians referred to as "the bone".  Once again the Titans stack 9 in the box. 

Problem 1 -Poor play design or execution:  I am curious as to what this one looks like on paper.   David Johnson and Frank Summers both fly at the left side of the line. Willie Parker seems to be going right by design.

I will give Arians the benifit of the doubt and assume that there is something else that should be happening. Perhaps Willie is supposed to follow his blockers left.  Perhaps the Titans are supposed to bite and follow his blockers to left. Neither happens.

Willie's blockers go left. He goes right. He has two free Titans on the right side, covering his gaps. He doesn't even get there, because Willie Colon slides off his man to chip the corner, allowing Parker to be dragged down behind the line of scrimmage.

Prognosis: I have no clue. Poor play call? Poor execution?  Bad read by Willie? All of the above? The only positive thing I can say is that if you pause the video at 37 seconds you can see a giant hole on the left hand side.

Play 3:  4th Quarter 2nd and 2.  Ball on the Titans 10 yard line. Running Back Mewelde Moore. Full Back Frank Summers.  

Problem 1:  Once again the Titans are looking run all the way.  With 2 yards to gain on second down they are giving Holmes a 6-7 yard cushion on the outside.  Has no one seen this guy play? Seems like a quick out pass could give you a first down if not a TD.  Alternatively a bootleg to Heath could create all sorts of problems for the Titans.  

Problem 2: Moore chooses the inisde? - OK - honsetly I don't think this is really a problem, but I do think that in cases like this you should be able to improvise.  Pause the video 1:04. Moore possibly has the room to break to the outside. He has nothing on the inside with one guy running free into his hole. I am assuming he thinks that he can make the guy miss or power through him. He doesn't. 

Prognosis:  Good D on the part of Titans. Summers makes his block, good for him.  Moore to his credit hits the hole hard and for a moment it looks like he will pick up the first.  I am not saying I want to cut Willie or Rashard, I do think Redman gets this first down.    

Play 4: 4th quarter 3rd and 1 on the Titans 9.  Running back Mewelde Moore Full back: Frank Summers. 

Problem 1: Willie Colon goes to the ground and misses his man.  Colon simply lunges at this guy and ends up on his knees. His man slips around him easily. 

Problem 2: Matt Spaeth does the exact same thing.  Summers correctly doubles up on Speath's man, but Moore has no where to go with Colon's guy in to the backfield basically untouched. 

Prognosis:  A good looking play call. Poor execution on the part of Colon an Spaeth, take the wind out of a Roethlisberger drive.   

 

Overall prognosis.  Our problems in the running game are wide-spread. I just looked at four plays but there was no lack of blame to go around.  Linemen, TE's, and fullbacks all whiffed on big blocks. The backs had little room to make things happened, but they never made a guy miss or powered through a tackle. The play calling didn't seem terrible, but it seemed that Titans read run and were able to stop it by over-committing. 

The good news is that these are fixable problems. The Titans have a great defense. They had no less than 9 guys in the box on all of those plays. This type of defense can and will be exploited by the Steelers down the road.  Play action passes can take advantage of stacked defensive fronts. Quick outs, slants and Bootlegs might do the same.

I think that we will see a big improvement from the running game in week 2.  

9 recs  |  Comment 128 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Buddha, really fine analysis (as usual)

The run is not ready for prime time, because it has a bunch of new parts. Will it improve? Of course.

As it stands, the runners trust neither the line nor themselves. The line is confused – needs more non-pad (!) reps. Too many of these guys are new to the grind, they’re (as one of my former coaches used to say) dancin’, not blastin’.

And one more thing I have to say – when BB sees more than 7 guys in the box, he should be throwing the damn ball, regardless of what BA is diagramming on his hotel napkin. He has one of the best receiver corps in Steeler history, and most assuredly the best arm. Keep the D honest!

My heros have always been Steelers...

by wozzle on Sep 12, 2009 2:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Frank Tanked

But Buddha scores! Thanks for the great analysis!

by TURFgeek on Sep 12, 2009 2:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

U R dead on!!!

Buddha,

So many people really don’t understand the game, another poster blamed Frank 100% for the 1st play and didn’t see Klumsy Kemo fall (ridiculous). Blockers I don’t trust – Spaeth, Kemo, and Summers. Way too may for us to have a consistent running game.

As I’ve said before FWP and Mendenhall have very poor vision for running backs. As Tomlin’s has stated the great running backs make their linemen great.

  • FWP looks like he’s looking for a place to fall, he used run so hard. I remember the game Buffalo need to get in the playoffs and FWP singlehandlely beat them running hard off tackle.
  • Mendy is all muscles and no heart. Dude looks like a tank and plays like tonka truck. I see nothing but soft.
  • Redman knows how to run the rock, great vision, makes people miss, and makes the tough yards while taking littel punishment.

Finally, it’s on Ben and Arians to check out of the run when 8 or 9 men are in the box, that’s is straight foolishness to run against this. The Detroit Lions can stop us from running if they put 8 or more in the box. Throw the rock to the 2 SB MVP’s playing wideout for us.

by 72Steeler on Sep 12, 2009 2:21 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Thanks and agree on most points

I think the key is recognizing when guys are stacking 7,8,9 guys in the box and making them pay for that. Would love for someone to post some more video of running plays so we could do a broader analysis.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 12, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I think you pretty much said it all.

I say that whenever they give Santonio or Hines an 8 yard cushion Ben should hit them for a quick slant. Keep doing that until you bring the corners all the way to the line (which sets them up for the pump fake and go…).

An whenever a team decides to stack 8 in the box, the short out to the tight end is there all day long.

8 in the box is a cheat. If you know they are doing it, you can exploit it. We have talent at the WR position and we have an exceptional pass catching TE. We should always be able to make teams pay for stacking 8 (or nine) in the box…

by MarkJoel66 on Sep 14, 2009 7:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correct

Except when you just tell a RB to charge right up the gut against that… well then you are BA and your offense aint going nowhere.

by Mechem on Sep 14, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FWP looks like he’s looking for a place to fall

That statement made me laugh out loud.

" I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Salty Browns Fan.

by Johnny_S on Sep 14, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That would describe Shaun Alexander as well

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 14, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

get up limping

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 14, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You ever notice Shaun Alexander looks like Shrek?

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 14, 2009 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not really

i just though he looked over rated

by WVPiratesfan on Sep 14, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

shouldn't you be working

I’m in between my college classes so I can be here because I have nothing else to do

by WVPiratesfan on Sep 14, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am working

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 14, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Kemo get's stepped on by Hartwig

Kemo’s foot get’s stepped on by Hartwig. That’s why he falls down.

However that only tells me that he is very slow to be able to trap-block (imagine, Hartwig snapped the ball and already is engaging his man, while Kemo has not gotten of his stance yet!)

I will post an O-line analysis this wednesday (takes a bit of time), for the Tenensse game, see if it you guys like it.

by The_Nation_in_Mexico on Sep 14, 2009 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Nation in Mexico

I look forward to your O-line analysis

by colingrant on Sep 16, 2009 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thoughts

Here’s another good resource for the OL. The running stuff starts at about 1:40.

Looking at the sum of those highlights, the biggest thing that struck me was how the OL actually did okay on a lot of the plays. They get some push and rarely let their guys go unblocked – which is the whole point of the zone blocking system. The second thing that struck me was how terrible FWP’s vision is when he has to choose the hole (ie when we zone block). The blocking is rarely flawless, but he’s consistently indecisive when acceptable 3 yard run type holes exist. He always seems to be on the wrong side of his blockers instead of running in ways that help them out.

One more point, and I’m going to agree and disagree with you here Buddha, the non-OL blockers are wretched. Miller, Spaeth on occasions, and obviously Summers all miss blocks or get beat pretty badly. Even the WR’s don’t do very well. The 2 TE running game is contingent on TE’s that can block DE’s and LB’s, which we don’t have.

If we are going to stick with zone blocking, first, we need a RB who knows how to run it (maybe Mendenhall, but it’s very possible he’s not on the roster – or practice squad). Second, we need TE’s and FB’s that can stick on their guys to give the RB a chance and even open up holes.

In my mind, there 2 potential solutions. One: switch to a man blocking system to fit our line and RB’s better. If this was going to happen, it probably would have before now, but if we look like this against the Bengals, maybe there’s a chance. The second option would be to risk starting Mendenhall, while replacing one of the TE’s with an OT like Ramon Foster. It could hurt our passing game a little, but we never pass out of the 2 TE sets anyway. This won’t happen either, largely because Arians has no clue what he’s doing and doesn’t have an ounce of creativity in that stubborn head of his.

One last option is to run the spread with Moore and only run draws and delays. We have the WR’s to run it and once Ben settles in a little, I think it could work pretty well. That won’t fix the running game as much as it will keep us from having to watch it. This is probably more likely to happen than the first two, but more than likely we’re going to see the same old running game and they’ll act like it’s fixed because we were able to run against the Lions.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 12, 2009 2:37 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thank you for the link and thoughtful analysis Bad

I might try to add analysis on the NFL film plays into the post, but they might flunk me out of grad school if I don’t a bit of work this weekend.

Re: the NFL films link, a couple of thoughts.

1. The pass protection plays they showed were awful. Our guys looked like clowns. I am not defending those plays, but I do think they played pretty solid pass pro for much of the game. This is in sharp contrast to last year.

2. Hear you about Willie. I am not sure how much of it is his fault, but he is not blameless. On at least one of the NFL film plays he makes a poor read and misses a big hole. I didn’t once see him use his speed to beat guys on the edge. Hope things change.

3. TE – I wouldn’t say everything was bad. Again, I am looking at a small sample size, but I saw both Spaeth and Miller make great blocks. I saw both completely whiff.

4. Man blocking scheme – I’ve heard a bunch of guys talk about it. It sounds reasonable, but I really don’t know enough. I think it would be great for someone to do a full piece on it. It also seems unlikely from what we have seen of Arians that he is going to switch it up any time soon.

5. An extra tackle – not sure about it in standard sets, but Matt Spaeth is underwhelming in power running situations. I would at least like to see David Johnson out there.

6. Spread offense – I think that in addition to audibles, play action, bootlegs, screens etc. – the spread will help keep guys from stacking the box.

Gone are the days when we can power run against a team that has 8 in the box. But we are very dangerous on offense. We have two/three receivers who can burn you long or make you miss if you give them cushion. We must make teams play scared of that option on running downs.

I think that Chicago will be an interesting test of the run game. They are a good defense. If we can run against them, I will feel much better.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 12, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couple links about the ZBS

Here’s a good intro by former Steelers fan cgolden:
http://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2008/8/4/586288/zone-blocking-versus-man-b

Here’s a comment I wrote on a dying fanpost:
http://www.behindthesteelcurtain.com/2009/9/11/1025462/should-we-become-arizone-east#21039218

The Chicago game will be interesting in the running game, but the biggest test will be when we face a team that uses predominantly man coverage like the Packers. Ben can pick apart a zone like he Titans and Bears and the WR’s know how to find the holes. We really struggled against man teams last year because the WR’s didn’t get off the line or get great separation, which opened us up the blitz. If we can’t run the ball either, you have the NFC east games from last year.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 12, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point on man-to-man defenses vs. zone and the Steelers

I do think things are different this year with the wide receiver corps. From what I’ve seen from Santonio really commiting himself to getting open, I don’t think the Steelers will have as many problems vs. man-to-man as they did last year.

Add to that the speediness of Wallace, McDonald’s shiftiness and ability to catch underneath, and I think the WRs are much better than last year.

Hell, if Sweed ever gets in and gets open he might even be able to make some grabs on quick outs or high balls over the D’s heads.

by pixburghese on Sep 12, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Zone Vs. Man

I hear you on the zone vs. man concepts for the running game.
However, the four plays shown above and the plays shown in the NFL page are all a man-blocking, power running design. Counter play on the first one (where Kemo trips), which is one-on-one for FB and pulling guard and some double teams and one-on-ones for the rest of the offense. The other plays are pure ISO plays, with a FB leading the way.

The reality is that with today’s defenses, most of the running plays are a combination between zone and man. There are fewer and fewer plays when it is all “hat-on-a-hat” or all zone blocks (and even then it is 2 Olinemen vs. 2 dfenders most of the time).

The matter is indeed complex and the fact is that if one man fails, then the play usually fails, and that can ev start with the QB’s cadence to snap the ball (notice in the video how Titan’s defenders seem to have a grasp of Ben’s cadance, they explode off the ball as if they knew when he would snap it) ..
Of course, having better linemen would help…(wasn’t Kemo suposed to be an excellent run blocker?…)

anyway…

by The_Nation_in_Mexico on Sep 14, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The problem with using the video as a representative sample is that it’s looking specifically at the 4 plays we ran with a FB. A lot of the other 18 runs are out of 2 TE sets with no FB. It is interesting that for all my harping on zone blocking as the cause of our woes, our man blocking sucked too, although it was largely caused by bad TE and terrible FB blocking (as I mentioned above, when they weren’t getting their feet stepped on, the OL wasn’t actually that bad).

My work blocks streaming video, but I’ll try to take a closer look at them tonight and write a better response, though.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 15, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple more points

There’s definitely a mix of man and zone blocking (the second play on the PGH video is definitely zone with 2 FB’s), but there’s another major theme: generally when we run we use 2 TE’s, even when man blocking. Yes, there were 9 men in box on those 4 runs, but how do we expect to beat them down the field when we only have 1 WR on the field basically in man coverage with a safety over top? The problem is that our TE’s and FB’s aren’t defeating the extra LB’s and safeties who crash down in the running game.

A couple obvious answers would be to pass to Miller out of this formation, to run more out of the spread, or to substitute OL’s for TE’s, since they know we’re not going to pass anyway. The point of having TE’s in the first place is that they’re blocking and receiving threats. We’re not passing out of the 2 TE sets, and whatever else our TE’s are they’re not outstanding blockers, so they’re not helping the running game when te defense knows what’s coming.

If we want to really “use the short passing game to open up the run”, it will be lining up in our famous 2 TE formations and PA passing to Miller, Spaeth and Mendenhall.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 15, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Many good points and honestly too much to talk about, but

in general I think that some of the problems will works themselves out in upcoming games. Playing the Titans in the first game was a major test that most people weren’t talking about. TN is probably one of the most difficult teams for the Steelers to match up against not matter what and we had them the first game. Remember last year?

As Tomlin has been saying, normally the most physical team wins. What other team besides the Ravens and possibly the Vikings are as physically imposing on defense as the Titans? I don’t think any.

I do think there has to be a better mix of plays overall. More screens, more running draws out of the spread, etc. As the O-line and other blockers start to learn their roles better, we can keep the defense off balance by running when they think pass and passing when they expect run. This seems to fit in perfectly with BB’s playing personality, so let’s try it.

Finally, I think the running backs themselves bear alot of the responsibility for the poor ground game. They are all running tentatively for different reasons.

FWP: Most people are forgetting that he has trained and played very little this summer. I don’t think he’s game fit yet and it shows in poor decision making and lack of burst. Pick a damn hole (or not) and run hard!!!

Mendy: Lack of experience and confidence is killing him. Seriously, I think alot of his problems are mental. He’s got the talent I just think he’s gun shy. Maybe the hit by Lewis last year that put him out has had a negative psychological effect, but at the very least he needs more reps to really get the jitters out.

Moore: He’s good at what he does.Not explosive but slippery. In his case I do think the O-line, FB, etc. let him down at the end of the 2nd half by not opening up holes. If he can be used more and better on screens I think that would open up the running game in the future.

Chicago will be another good test, but really I don’t think they have a stacked D-line like the Titans, so there will be more space opened up.

Bottomline, these guys NEED to be able to run to win games and give some space to BB and the plassing game. Whatever it takes it nneds to happen

by pixburghese on Sep 12, 2009 4:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What people are forgetting about Willie . . .

Is that he had 4 carries in the whole preseason. Give him a chance to get back his timing with the OL, and I think we’ll see the Willie of yesteryear.

by sylvansteeler on Sep 13, 2009 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh and...

You say “pick a damn hole”

I would love to find said hole but I cant seem to. Its like taking home a person you thought was a girl only to find out its a man baby.

Nobody had space. Quit picking on FWP

by Mechem on Sep 14, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FWP: Most people are forgetting that he has trained and played very little this summer. I don’t think he’s game fit yet and it shows in poor decision making and lack of burst. Pick a damn hole (or not) and run hard!!!

Depends on what you mean by “game fit”. As I recall, it was reported that FWP showed up to summer practice absolutely ripped.

I don’t think his problems are physical. I think you’re closer to the truth when you say he can’t pick a hole. The linemen as supposed to stop people from getting to him AND open up at least one hole. Those holes don’t open in time for FWP to find them. By the time they do, he is already trying to juke the defender in the backfield.

A this point, I think he is suffering from learned helplessness.

by Varmint on Sep 14, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

analysis

Excellent job with this. You definitely pinpointed the culprits in each play. These DO seem like fixable plays. I’m not sure what happened on the other 20-some rushing attempts, but I do hope to see a big improvement. I’d like to see Ben audible our team out of those runs when he sees the D overcommiting.

by Pola-Gona-Maul-U on Sep 12, 2009 4:21 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Some helpful video

It’s a bit grainy, but it very clearly explains in detail the individual problems and demonstrates, in explicit detail, how to correct the different ailments of the running game

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_laaxl1EKqQ&feature=related

by pghnorthside on Sep 12, 2009 5:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

First play

Kemo doesn’t just trip over himself, Hartwig steps on his foot

by Brock3 on Sep 12, 2009 5:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice buffet

 good eats, easy to reach, truly nice spread. Well done!thanks.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Sep 12, 2009 5:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Troy

Has a sprained MCL as you all know but, do you guys think it is the Madden Curse? Is Larry Fitz next?

Amazing, Jamarcus Russell hands off to McFadden who pitches it back to Russell who finds Darrius Heyward Bey in the Middle of the Field wide open 30, 20,10,5 Touchdown Raiders! Amazing. This telecast is Brought to you by Cable.

by nishal26 on Sep 12, 2009 7:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It is

Not really relevant to this particular thread.

But the curse exists.

by Mechem on Sep 14, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We (steelers) don't subscribe to that hocus-pocus

But man not even the first half of the first game!!

by steelerstyle on Sep 14, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I does subscribe

Everybody’s been hit by it basically.

I’m just waiting for Fitty now. Breaston and Boldin arent 100%, so you know it will be next week. Fitty gets like 90% of the balls thrown his way, and will get a boof or rolled on or a waterboy will splash hot water in his eye or something.

by Mechem on Sep 14, 2009 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everybody can have an opinion. But

Hightower caught 12 balls and larry 6 yesterday.

by steelerstyle on Sep 14, 2009 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It looked to me like Warner was on the cover.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 15, 2009 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The curse isnt always week one ya know. Ray Lewis got his season ended, what week 15? So anything can happen.

by Mechem on Sep 16, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder if that curse works backward?

Because Troy has been hurt a lot. So I think we need to go ask the Oracle. Was Troy hurt in 07 because he would one day be on the cover of Madden or was it SI? The real question is; if there was no Madden would injuries exist? Random thought: If the curse exists why not but McNabb on the cover every year it wouldn’t change anything….then again he may actually play a whole season. Ahhhh questions my child…just ask the Oracle.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 15, 2009 8:12 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Remember

We cant see past the choices we do not understand.

by Mechem on Sep 16, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everything that has a beginning has an end. I see the end coming, I see the darkness spreading. I see death.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 16, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is a good point. Is the Madden curse a causal or non-causal system? Perhaps it is part of a larger transcendent system and injuries and being on the cover of Madden are simply two of it’s artifacts in our time-space – like two points of a massive iceberg – that we never would have noticed the correlation of if they weren’t parts of a very popular sport?

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 16, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, Mr. Anderson, I see you are as predictable in this world as you are in the other.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 16, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But wait, Neo never met Agent Smith outside of the Matrix. Right…?

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 16, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you see revolutions? He did

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 17, 2009 7:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Matrix ended when Neo was resurrected and killed Agent Smith. That was the end. Right? Right?

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 17, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, yes....uh

Wait. I’ve seen this. I stand here, right here, and I’m supposed to say something. I say, “Everything that has a beginning has an end, Neo.”

what? what did I just say?

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 17, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And hopefully that ending (and middle) lives up to the standard of excellence displayed in the beginning and doesn’t leave me reaching for the blue pill.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 17, 2009 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

in the end, Mufasa dies. Simba’s fault.

by shleeve on Sep 18, 2009 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey aren't Timon and Pimba hurt?

Oh wait, that’s Timmons and Polamalu.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 18, 2009 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hakuna Matata

it means no worries, for the rest of your days

by shleeve on Sep 18, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Question

Am I correct in stating that the linemen we have are better suited for power blocking as opposed to zone blocking and our running backs, such as Parker is better suited to hit a predefined hole vs reading where the hole may be?

Then why are we running a zone blocking scheme?

by Steeler Nation VA on Sep 12, 2009 8:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The Tank

I don’t get why so many people are so tought on Frank the Tank. Some are talking as he is responsible in a big way of our struggles running against the Titans and should be send to the PS

He is a rooky making his first NFL start and played 5 plays, yes 5 of the 26 running plays.

Of those 5 plays, he had one very good block on a blitzing LB in the back field, he did his job in two other plays, he made a below average block in one and completely whiff his guy on another.

That is not as bad as people are making it sound.

As Buddha points out, the problem is spread. Is play calling by BA, lack of audible from BB, OL whiffs, TE whiffs, RB lack of burst and vision.

And more importantly is play design and matchup design. Many of our running plays have no room for anyone to make a mistake, and that’s wishful thinking with our personnel right know. And many others ask our players to do something they just can’t do at the level that is required.

Anyway in my opinion Tank didn’t play as bad as you read in this board and others. And I think he will get much better.

by mikemex on Sep 12, 2009 9:07 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Blame

I agree there is enough blame to go around. But Tank should get some of the blame. Blocking is not ok if everybody locks only on 9 of 10 plays and they take turns screwing up. The result is 1.6 yards per carry.

Tank is a rookie, but if he wants to play for the Browns then wiffing on blocks may be acceptable, but not on the Steelers. That is why we win Super Bowls and the Browns don’t.

by Steeler Nation VA on Sep 12, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree there is enough blame to go around including the Tank.

But if you want to get specific the Tank is responsible for half a tackle. Only in one play his guy assisted in the tackle.

And if you want to send to the Browns every guy who was responsible for the 1.6 yards per carry you are sending everybody, including Hines, remember his holding penalty negated the best run of the night.

But I think you nailed it when you said Blocking is not ok if everybody locks only on 9 of 10 plays and they take turns screwing up. That is exactly what is happening.

by mikemex on Sep 12, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Outstanding FanPost

By the way, I posted the video link to Frank Summer’s blocking

I am not blaming him. It was his first game and he only had a few plays. I think he has potential to be a good football player.

I am blaming the coaches first with the run blocking.

It is the coaches fault. The blocking schemes that they are using.

by lightningrod on Sep 12, 2009 9:28 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Brilliant

Nice to see an analytical view of the running game that does not say ISAAC REDMAN IS GOD AND WE SHOULD BE STARTING HIM

Frank Summers will get it. He showed in preseason he could handle fullback duties, he had a hard first up opponent in Tennessee, but he will get the hang of it

Its waaaay too early to panic

Bleeding Black and Gold.....forever

by Steeler_ on Sep 12, 2009 10:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Rope-A-dope

Hey Buddah kinda of younger than most, but Ikinda of gave my uncle the readers digest version of the game on thursday he said thats what Muhamad Ali did against fighters. He would tier out his opponets before unleashing his arsenal. Do u see the steelers wearing down their opponets D and keeping it close and then un-leashing the no-huddle O

by steelermafia on Sep 13, 2009 12:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nicely done

I envy people who can so completely (yet concisely) pick apart exactly what’s going on during the chaos of a play. I tend to get stuck on “that didn’t work very well. The Steelers could improve by running the ball better.”

by TheSpatulaMessiah on Sep 13, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Zone Blocking

I’m not sure if the Titans use a zone blocking scheme or not but one obvious difference in their running attack and the Steelers’ was the ability of the Tennessee runners to cutback. I’m not sure whether this is a scheme thing or a vision thing but imo the steeler line got as much push as the Titans – our backs just seemed determined to run into the largest pile of bodies.

by dermonti09 on Sep 13, 2009 6:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

flea flicker

yea I know ba does not like trick plays ,but 9 man in the box,by running a few flea flickers will keep them more honest. ps if the d-backs are crashing the run it will work every time.

'position flex-ability, yea baby' austin powers

by sweetleb on Sep 14, 2009 8:15 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is an absolutely excellent fanpost.

It has been touched upon by several above including Buddha, but harping on the titans stacking the box is key. Throughout the game, not only when we had Tank in, the titans were stacking the box. Most often it was 8, it was also 9.

Even if our offensive line was great, we are not going to be able to run on the titans defense with 9 in the box. It just isn’t going to happen. We have a chance against 8, if our O-line was great. It’s not.

Arians, or Ben, or both need to get their act together on this point. I suspect it is Arians telling Ben he has to run it, because I’m sure Ben would be more than happy to throw it to Santonio. Not even an oblivious QB would have missed when the titans were stacking the box, they were not shy about it at all.

Again, great post.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 14, 2009 9:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Agreed completely

I think Arians was the biggest issue that night. He simply kept calling run. That one drive early in the 2H, where he called 3 STRAIGHT RUNS against a team allowing <2 per carry… I mean come on.

Never once did I see a single pitch out run either. This also drives me mad. Every time we run one Parker gets at least a 5 spot. Hes so much better in space. Why the hell would you send anybody up the middle with our shit o-line, and a great defense on the other side?

Its always the same exact type of run, between the tackles. Get parker out in space please.

by Mechem on Sep 14, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t have an answer for BA’s call for three runs. But, if I had to guess, I’d say BA was trying to tire the Titan’s defensive line.

by Varmint on Sep 14, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

1) They essentially threw for 400 yards

2) Your suspicion, which looks to pin the blame on Arians, is as speculative as it is unimaginative.

by Rougue_Behaviorist on Sep 14, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yards mean nothing if they don’t lead to points. When throwing for 400 yards, one expects more points to be on the board. Points were not put on the board because passing consistency led to drives getting bogged down in running, which was inconsistent. Throwing for 80 yards in a drive is great, ending the drive in failure is not. I wouldn’t expect that you are content losing a game when we only score 13 points because “we threw for essentially 400 yards”, but maybe I’m wrong.

My suspicion is very speculative. It doesn’t take much imagination to blame arians, nor does a lack of imagination make my suspicion incorrect. I’m happy to blame anyone else, Ben, Tomlin, whomever.

The fact remains, you do not run with 9 in the box.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 14, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

unless you are the steelers

we are witnessing stubbornness redefined.

by SteelersVT on Sep 15, 2009 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But it is awfully imaginative, isn’t it?

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 15, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple observations...

I noticed on at least 3 occassions last season that we had some decent runs when they pull Kemo right and have a FB lead in front of the HB, going right. Kemo is better when he has some steam behind him, but doesn’t get much push from standing still. Obviously, they can’t do this every play, but it’s one that I’ve noticed that seems effective.

I can’t understand why they aren’t using any play action. That way, when they line up on like a 2nd and 6, and show run,

by twault on Sep 14, 2009 10:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Kemo is nonathletic and whiffs a lot. He is not an effective puller at all. Essex should be LG,. Kemo should be RG. If we are going to continue that style of pulling, anyhow.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 14, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

continued, sorry

they can keep the defense honest.

When the Steelers are in an obvious running formation, they can use play action to keep the defense guessing. That will keep defenses from over-committing to the run.

Bringing in an extra tackle (aka HEAVY SET), wouldn’t be a bad idea either. Arians like 3 TE sets, just replace Spaeth with a big body like Ramon Foster and pound the ball for those 3rd-and 1s.

If the defenders keep stacking the box, punish them by keeping them out of position to make plays. Play action, bootlegs, etc.

Give the Titans credit, they do have one of the best D-lines in the NFL.

by twault on Sep 14, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Rookie TE

Why don’t/didn’t they use the rookie TE instead of Summers. Summers looks like a big flop right now and needs to sit and learn, I thought he would be a head banger but looks very timid when blocking.

by ColinP on Sep 14, 2009 11:33 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Tank is a “threat” to run.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 14, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Overarching Problem

Excellent post, thanks Buddha. I keep seeing people talking about lineup changes, missed blocks, different personnel sets and so, but in hindsight this almost seems like a will to failure by Arians and co. Not saying I will blame him like most might, but this does reek of stubbornness on his part. We seem quite attached to the old vision of smashmouth Steelers football and ideologically opposed to utilizing trickery.

For example, we use a 2-TE or 3-TE set but rarely throw out of it. I agree on the concept of utilizing Foster but then that sacrifices some of the uncertainty in the play call (not that there is much anyway). I was amazed watching some of the games yesterday how surprised I was after much of the playcalling. It was often completely unexpected from pre-snap. In short, I think we are stuck between the mentality of our defense (impose our will on the other team) and the type of talent we have on offense (utilize the intellect to out-think and out-execute our opponents).

Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(

by sctx109 on Sep 14, 2009 12:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

(utilize the intellect to out-think and out-execute our opponents).

You’d like to think that, wouldn’t you? It has worked! You’ve given everything away! I know where the poison is!

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 14, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You Fool!

You just fell victim to one of the classic blunders! The most famous of course is never get involved in a land war in Asia, but only slightly less well-known is this: never run the ball when 9 guys are stacked on the line! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha…

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 14, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you spend several years developing a resistance to I-formation powder?

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 14, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thoughts in Arian's head?

Arians: But it’s simple All I have to do is divine from what I know about your defense; are you the sort of man who would stack 9 in the box and expect me to run a trick play to bring you off the line. Now, a clever man would do that , because he would know that only a great fool would run against 9 in the box. I am not a great fool, so clearly you must expect that I will try to pass. But you must have known I was not a great fool, in fact you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not to pass.
Jeff Fisher: Are you done yet?
Arians: Not remotely. The I formation originated in Australia, as everyone knows, and Australia is entirely peopled with criminals, and criminals are used to having people not trust them, as you are not trusted by me, so I can clearly not run a trick play out of the I formation.
Jeff Fisher: Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 14, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

There is a reason Vizzini is a recurring theme when it comes to Arians, and it’s not because Arians is sicilian.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 14, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did Vizzini

used to coach for the Browns? That would explain a great deal.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 14, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No. That was Sam Rutigliano

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Sep 14, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey 50?

At what point do you lose the “When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen” tag? It doesn’t seem to ring as true these days.

Also, this is not hating, I love a strong running game, but don’t see the Steelers as having it this year.

by Chicago Steeler on Sep 14, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

heh

maybe it’s time for:

“when Large Ben passes the ball Good Things Happen”

by acrollet on Sep 14, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah tell that to Earnest Byner

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 15, 2009 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

My biggest complaint

I dont know if anybody caught Stillers.com breakdown of Arians led drives vs. Ben’s No Huddle drives, but it was amazing.

We ran on so many 2nd and longs with arians calling it. He called run so much this game when we were getting stuffed. Honestly that was just moronic.

Ben never once played a run on 2nd and long, and he got a pile of first downs.

Its all about WHEN you call the play. You need to throw them off. I think we tip off the defense way too damn much.

by Mechem on Sep 14, 2009 1:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Trickery

I think Arians thinks he’s “tricking” the opponent by calling “Run” on a typical passing situation (2nd and long) and calling “Pass” on a typical running situation (1st and 10). Now, I don’t mind passing on 1st down (just not on every series), and I think it is a good strategy to keep defenses on their toes. However, that being said, if you are going to run on a 2nd and long, let’s do it without 9 guys stacked in the box and try something a little less vanilla than a handoff up the gut.

by twault on Sep 14, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FWP's last season in Pittsburgh & here's why ...

- The Steelers have officially become a pass-first team and FWP can’t catch the ball. Mendy and M. Moore can. He really doesn’t offer that much in pass protection as well.

- FWP’s game pretty much consisted of his burst. During the preseason and the first game, it appeared his burst wasn’t there. In fact, he looked slow to me. There were a couple of times where I waited for him to switch and he didn’t (or maybe he did and nothing happened).

- It’s no secret FWP doesn’t run well against the good defenses. He’s just not the type of back that is going to make someone miss and get you that extra yard. M. Moore does that and I wasn’t all that impressed with Mendy, but I did see where he carried Bullock for a ride a couple of times after being hit at the line of scrimmage.

- FWP is in the last year of his contract and I don’t think the Steelers will give big money to a guy on the decline. Besides the normal free agents looking to get paid here (R. Clark, Big Snack, J. Reed) the team will have S. Holmes and L. Woodley both in the last year of their deals next year. All of the above mentioned (particularly Holmes and Woodley) are more of a priority than FWP.

- With Mendy, M. Moore, Summers, Redman and whomever the Steelers draft and find in the rookie free agent bin, the Steelers would still be okay with FWP. It’s better to let a player walk a year early than keeping them a year too long. Look at the situation Carolina is in with Jake Delhomme, $20M guaranteed to a player that is a pretty terrible QB right now.

- Lastly, all this isn’t FWP’s fault. The OL that he is playing behind isn’t very good right now, but he is just too one-dimensional right now for a Coach that preaches the more you can do. If FWP is getting you any yards on the ground, what is he doing for your team? He can’t catch the ball out of the backfield, he’s not the best in blitz pick up, he doesn’t offer you anything in special teams. Just being realistic that we’re probably seeing the last of him in a Steelers uniform. I hope that I’m wrong on this but I don’t think so.

by datruth4life on Sep 14, 2009 1:26 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I agree with your last point most of all

FWP is a pure runner. His pass-protection is modest at best, and he does a poor job catching the ball in space. Unless he’s putting in great performances running you go with people who can do multiple things. Case in point is the end of the game when we saw Memo, and only Memo. Sorry FWP, I have enjoyed watching you as a Steeler and you may go on and have productive years elsewhere (see Joey Porter), but your days here are limited/done.

by Chicago Steeler on Sep 14, 2009 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There are no holes for Willie to get through. I’m not blaming the O-Line entirely, because Willie is not getting the burst he once had. However, age 30 is ancient for a RB, and few have had productive seasons beyond age 29. The writing is on the wall for FWP. That being said, Mendy better show something this season or we’ll be looking for another RB in the draft or another undrafted guy out of nowhere. Redmond could be that guy if he shows enough improvement.

by twault on Sep 14, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

On the other hand

Maybe we have a bit of a blessing in disguise here. After all, FWP did have three TDs and 100+ yds last year in the first game, and where did that get him? I say, in full optimism, keep on sucking [for now], FWP.

Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(

by sctx109 on Sep 14, 2009 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Here's why--the team did not extend his contract

The Steelers never sign a significant player during or after the final season in his contract. If they plan to keep him, they extend his contract before his final season. That’s why the team extended Harrison, Ward, Miller, Keisel, and others. So we already know this is the final season for Parker (and probably Clark, Hampton, and Reed). Enjoy them while you can.

by Steelin on Sep 14, 2009 6:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

more good news

we play the Bears next week or are now without Brian Urlacher for the year, could open up some running lanes.

by shleeve on Sep 14, 2009 2:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bears looked solid on D

Adewale Ogunleye made Allen Barbe look like a girl’s doll. They sacked Rogers 4 times.

Overall they held a strong Packers offense to a stand still even with their coach and starting QB repeatedly stabbing them in the back.

Notice though what the Packers did to them on 3rd and 1 with the game on the line. Play action, 50 yard touchdown.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 14, 2009 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It would definitely be intruiging,,,

to throw scripting the first 15 plays out the window if necessary, and take what the defense is giving us. I wonder how confused a team would be if Ben executed the first drive no huddle. Short passes to TEs, Outs, an occasional run, and then once they are on their heels, maybe a bit of power running.

Either way, I would like to see some of this excellent progress from Mendenhall that Sartre Tomlin keeps telling us about. Or at least give him an extended run to try to do so, without Ray Lewis of course.

Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(

by sctx109 on Sep 14, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

Watching the Bill-Pats.

Bills came out with Van Pelt’s no huddle and had great success making reads at the line of scrimmage against the pats.

The Pats came back and did a lot of running against out of spread formations.

Both seemed to work well.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 14, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

was a rough end to that game

would have loved to see edwards + bills step up and win it. oh well. on another note, have you seen the raiders running at will on SD? I guess we know why FWP put all those yards up last year… still impressive though

by acrollet on Sep 14, 2009 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate the pats and they stank

God now its all about Brady again and how great he is at coming back. Nevermind they needed a damn fumble when the dumbass should have taken a touchback.

by Mechem on Sep 14, 2009 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

commentators drooling

over his snappy hip action were cracking me up. At least they didn’t cover.

by Steely McSmash on Sep 15, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ha, you said “great success”

jagshemesh

by shleeve on Sep 18, 2009 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

FWP will knock off the rust and get comfy behind the new( sort of to him) line

and end up being a back you can count on for 2-3 yards when you need them. As has been pointed out before, FWP has always delivered and shut up the nay-sayers. I think he can do it again and hope he does. That being said, I am anxious to get Redman some carries at some point. He’s a violent runner for sure.

by SteelersFnRule on Sep 14, 2009 4:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Good News and bad news

I re watch all of the running plays from last Thursday.

The good news is no one involve in the running game was awful; there wasn’t a mismatch like Stapleton in the Super bowl or Kemeatu last time we played the Titans.

Everybody played ok for most of the game, and did their jobs. But every body made 3 or 4 bad plays. I mean it was amazing how Colon could destroyed his guy for most of the game and then watch him get drag in a play by his guy all the way from the right of the OL to the left.

The bad news is we don’t have a single player in the running game that is elite or even great. No one would do anything special, I couldn’t see anyone destroying his man and them moving in space to the second level to get another hat, I didn’t see anyone driving his man four yards back, and I didn’t see a single running back breaking a tackle or making a great cut. (Compare this to the Passing game where we have so much talent that even when the play breaks, the elite players make it succeed)

If you are going to run against a good defense with 8 to 9 men in the box and you don’t have anyone special to do it behind, there is no room for a single mistake from anyone involve in the play. Everybody has to their job to be successful. And that only happen twice last Thursday. On all the other plays al least one or two made a mistake destroying the played.

So what do you do next? Can we expect that with more practice and continuity they could increase the number of plays that everybody does their job? Or you understand your reality and become a passing teams, that runs from the spread and in limited situations?

by mikemex on Sep 14, 2009 4:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice analysis

As Tomlin has said and as you summarized really well, the problems of running vs. Tennessee were a collective effort continually sabotaged by alternating screwups. Another factor is that it’s up to Ben to audible out of running plays when he sees the safety come down or if the D-line is gap-aligned to beat the initial blocking call, which he failed to do a number of times in Game 1. Something I did notice was that a lot of the run-game was actually man-blocking, which is a better fit for this group of O-linemen but very tough against eight men in the box who are physical. If you’re going to beat eight men in the box, you usually need an athletic O-line that can get to the second level and create a seam (and a running back who can see it developing), or TE, FB and WR sealing the edge for something outside the tackles. Otherwise, you are only going to get the minimal yardage of a back plowing behind the initial push or get blown up for a loss by someone whiffing a block. I don’t think there is any doubt the Steelers will continue working at it and trying to run the football, though there’s nothing wrong with using the pass to set up the run.

by steeler.lifer on Sep 17, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Whiz is a bia-iz

He’s the one who’s stashing Dan Kreider…figures. He’s the all time hater.

Alright, okay, I don't dance, no way I just take my Terrible Towel out and wave it around in the air!!!!

by Steel R on Sep 14, 2009 9:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

How long will the zone system last

I would hope that another game like this one would be enough for Tomlin to step in and dump the zone blocking system. It is confusing the OL and the backs are running timid because they don’t know where to go. Even Memo(and I like Memo a lot) who is getting all kinds of praise in most of the posts I have read, had a whopping 8 yds. on 5 carries. He certainly is our best pass catching back but 1.6 yds/carry is 1.6 I don’t care how much prettier he looked doing it than the other backs, they all averaged about the same. I have to believe that the line isn’t moving people because they are a little confused on who to block as well, that is a pretty big line that should be getting a pretty decent push in most circumstances. Change to a blocking scheme that everyone understands and you instantly have at least some improvement. Throw in some play action when there is 8 in the box and you start to spread out defenses a little bit, do it often enough and successfully and you really start to spread them out. And for God’s sake hand the damn ball off quicker, we have to have the slowest handoffs in the league. Now come out passing in the spread no huddle offense, and then run out of the spread. Lastly if you are going to run out of the 2-3 TE why not just put an extra line man in. NE ran several times tonight with 6 lineman. And most important get BA to read BHTSC,LOL Seriously I don’t think T was very happy after the game so hopefully most of this is being discussed already, I can’t imagine having him angry with you is a very pleasant experience.

by DarinS on Sep 14, 2009 11:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Screw running Steelers need to pass more

by archon095 on Sep 15, 2009 12:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why not

use David Johnson (FB) and the Tank (HB) on short yardage sets?

by BlackandGoldSSgt on Sep 15, 2009 12:37 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

D.J. and Tank in the backfield together ...

will get a shot eventually, I think. Tomlin said he’s auditioning for a short-yardage back & FWP and M. Moore didn’t look great in their first opportunities.

I do think Tank would probably be more comfortable in that role than being a lead blocking FB right now because that is what Tank has done all his college career. I believe if the Steelers are patient, they will be rewarded with Tank.
However, I think if the ground game continues to sputter like it did this past week, Tomlin will make some moves.

Remember, he’s the one who said “I will tolerate you until I can replace you.”

by datruth4life on Sep 15, 2009 2:09 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

How about this combo

2 WR split out, 6 lineman, Ben, Ziggy as a lead block, and either Tank or Mendy at RB. The two wides keeps play action as a possiblity and with over a ton of blocking if we can’t pick up 1-2 yds. it is time for air Ben. Mostly joking when I started this but I actually think Ziggy would do pretty well, only in short yardage though.

by DarinS on Sep 15, 2009 5:17 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ziggy aint no Fridge

He is not an offensive hole finder. He fills holes, doesn’t make them.

Interesting concept but if we really wanted a D player to get us short yardage we could just have Polamalu leap over the top every time.

by Mechem on Sep 16, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

how about this?

Parker is a speed back, we friggin run some sweeps and pitches with him on the goalline………..ARIANS!

by shleeve on Sep 18, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta love so many Steeler fans wanting to go Pass Crazy!

Love that so many steeler fans want to go pass crazy! We do have a strong QB and deeeeep WR core 2SBMVP’s etc. hell even the TE is awesome but understand in the NFL there are basically 2 football seasons, Fall (Sept-Nov) Late Fall (Dec&Jan) Pass oriented teams do very well Sept-November but unless your in a dome the elements take a toll and you gotta pound the ball in Dec. if you wanna play deep in January! Even short throws are tuff in December. The Steelers D needs rest and the clock needs to be shed if they can’t make 3rd and 1 consistently it will be a tough January. I hope by then Mike and company have what there looking for. I predict that fast Willie and company will do well as the season goes and the O will put up big #‘s but we need a mudder and a snow plow I thought Mendenhal would be that guy but he is like a boxer who got knocked out and I don’t know if he will recover mentally. As far as Redman goes he did look good but can he do it in the weather and can he do it 20+ a game. The pass will keep us afloat till December but if I was Coach I would definitley be planning for rainy days ahead.Still need a solid road grater on O line this line reminds me of the 80’s Dolphins(pass blocking oriented) You can have a HOF QB but you won’t win without getting 1 yard on the ground.

by Darold L on Sep 15, 2009 5:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ben throws better in the cold than most any other QB in the league

Most of our WR’s seem to play well enough in the cold too. Pats are good in this regard as well.

by SteelersVT on Sep 15, 2009 6:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The San Diego game last january looked pretty good on the ground. I can’t say we won against Baltimore or Ari with our stellar run game.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 15, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Running game will come...

These three sentences sum up an excellent analysis by Buddha:

The good news is that these are fixable problems. The Titans have a great defense. They had no less than 9 guys in the box on all of those plays.

just my opinion... steelershark

by steelershark on Sep 15, 2009 7:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't know if it means anything

The Steelers cut TE Dezmond Sherrod from the practice squad today and signed TE Kevin Brock (6-5, 255). Brock was primarily a blocking TE for Rutgers last year. We’ll see if it amounts to anything but hopefully Matt Spaeth improves and it doesn’t really matter anyhow.

" It's caught out of the air "

by TJFINN on Sep 15, 2009 8:11 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

He’s a replacement for DJ, not Spaeth.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 15, 2009 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure about that steelguy

Brock is a typical on the line TE, not H-back material who can run some plays as a fullback. Brock showed some decent pass-catching ability at Rutgers but is an undeveloped player who needs time on the practice roster. IMO the Steelers are interested in short-term depth and longer-term alternatives to re-signing Spaeth, who is a RFA next spring.

by steeler.lifer on Sep 15, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree long-term that could be the case, but it’s not going to happen this year and I doubt it will happen next year. RFA’ing Spaeth is an easy move, it might allow them to give him a lower tender offer if they have confidence in a backup.

The year after? It could happen, but I doubt Brock will be on our PS in two years. I’m all for replacing Spaeth, but I don’t see this move being it. Before McHugh our 3rd TE wasn’t an H-back, that’s a very new trend and if Summers develops as a reasonable FB I expect the 3rd TE would revert to blocking from the line.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 16, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If Heath goes down for an extended period nobody else on the team including this fella from Rutgers has the pass catching abilities of Matt Spaeth….he is a necessary evil, even though most of you hate him with a passion.

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by drinkyourmilkshake on Sep 16, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the running game

 i am so glad im not the only one who fears whats going on. the runing game keeps the defense fresh and playing great, if we dont fix it fast , when we play good offensive teams by the third qtr, are team is not going to look and play good defensive football.
i just hopethe steeler braintrust rectify their ways, our team is about finding gems in the rough we found one play him, dont let a fifth rounder keep us from getting better
after all didnt we just cut a third rounder and mr. sweeds is not burnig the field neither
so when you find a diamond shinen-up..

by steelpony on Sep 16, 2009 6:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Kimo's Fall

Look more closely, Kimo didn’t just fall, Justin Hartwig stepped on his foot. This is pretty common, just ask Kurt Warner, good on the rest of the analysis.

by BigMac1963 on Sep 17, 2009 2:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
What players have you most wished could have been Steelers?
2196876391_dcb0380cb0_small
Okay. We need some fun!
Me_small
The BTSC Predict the Score Competition, Wk 11 @ KC Chiefs
J_page_small
Talk Chiefs with AP
Miketomlin-200_small
A look to 2005 and back to the present

Recent FanPosts

Markstadiumoutside_small
Steelers to Lose Super Bowls
Small
Assistance Needed
Small
2010 NFL Mock Draft : Updated 11/20
Markstadiumoutside_small
Stephen Logan needs to go
Franco72_small
Keisel The Diesel
Scr_logo_v5_small
STEEL CURTAIN RADIO #47: ARE THE CHIEFS SLUMP BUSTERS?
Small
Steelers vs. Cowboys
Sidney_steelers_small
Gatewood added to practice squad

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Site Founder & Editor

Mbean_small Blitzburgh

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake