NFL Week 1 In The Books
A few thoughts from me now that Week 1 of the 2009 NFL season is in the books.
* Let's start with the AFC North where much like last year, Baltimore and Pittsburgh carried the torch for the division with aplomb while Cincinnati and Cleveland failed to make the case that this coming year would be much different than last. The losses by both Cleveland and Cincinnati have to be considered disappointments - both were at home after all. But it was the Bengals' 12-7 defeat to the Broncos on the game's final play that was particularly sad. Even though the Bengals continued to play better defense - much like last year - Carson Palmer and the offense sputtered, gaining just 221 yards through the air while turning the ball over twice. The Bengals have no time to feel sorry for themselves either. They travel to Green Bay next week then host the Steelers in Week 3. Two more losses and their season will just about be over before it even really gets started. As for the Browns? Not such a great showing in Eric Mangini's first game as head coach. The Browns surrendered 180 rushing yards and 3 touchdowns to the amazing Adrian Peterson. On offense, Brady Quinn was decent, but he turned the ball over twice, was sacked four times and converted only 3-12 third downs during Cleveland's 34-20 defeat at home to the Vikings. Cleveland travels to Denver and to Baltimore the next two weeks and could also find themselves in a world of trouble if they don't at least capture one victory in the next two weeks before returning home to face Cincinnati in Week 4.
* How about Baltimore? Very impressive opener for John Harbaugh's squad. The Ravens somehow found themselves in a fairly close game despite outgaining the Kansas City Chiefs 501 yards to just 188. Joe Flacco began to make his case that he's no one-hit wonder by throwing for over 300 yards and 3 touchdowns. Ray Rice meanwhile eclipsed the century mark on the ground. Penalties plus one interception that was returned 70 yards by the Chiefs kept this game closer than it really was, but Baltimore sealed the deal with 21 4th quarter points. I'm still not 100% convinced Baltimore is a playoff caliber team this year, but we'll certainly find out a lot more about them in the next three weeks. They next travel to San Diego, then host the Bengals, followed by another road game at New England against the Patriots.
* NFC Team of the Week - Philadelphia Eagles. Plenty of other candidates - New Orleans, Atlanta, Dallas even. But I'll take the Eagles, who forced 6 turnovers en route to a 38-10 thrashing over Carolina on the road. Donovan McNabb suffered a cracked rib and may miss action in the forthcoming weeks, but if Philly's defense can maintain anywhere near as high a level of play for most of this year, the Eagles should be in great shape to return to the playoffs and once again challenge for an NFC crown.
* AFC Team of the Week - New York Jets. Not many people thought Mark Sanchez would lead his team to victory on the road against the Houston Texans in both his and head coach Rex Ryan's first game. They did and did so emphatically, winning 24-7 in a game that wasn't ever in question. The Jets notched almost 300 yards more than did the Texans, converted 10-18 on 3rd down, held the ball for 17 more minutes than did the Texans and...well, they did just about everything better than a team that had been 12-4 at home the past two seasons. Congratulations to the Jets. Enjoy it while it lasts because I can't see them posting too many more similarly impressive outcomes this season.
* NFC Player of the Week - Drew Brees. Easy choice there. Brees threw for over 350 yards and 6 touchdowns. He connected with 8 different receivers, 5 of which caught at least one touchdown pass. Brees has lit up poor defenses plenty of times before though. It remains to be seen if he can avoid the turnover bug that has cost him and his team crucial victories in years past. Next week's showdown with the Eagles might give fans a glimpse of who one of the more legitimate contenders in the NFC is.
* AFC Player of the Week - Joe Flacco. Tough call here. No true standout performances in Week 1 in this conference. Big Ben was good. Brady and Moss were good. Troy Polamalu was amazing until getting injured. Peyton Manning was his usually solid self. I'll go with Flacco though, who had both his first 300+ yard passing game as well as his first 3+ touchdown performance. We'll see how things progress for him and the rival Ravens when the competition tightens up a bit beginning this coming week.
* A random note but if at all possible, find a way to watch San Franciso 49ers linebacker Patrick Willis play sometime. The 49ers are usually engaged in insufferably awful games to watch - this weekend's road victory over the Arizona Cardinals was no different really. But Willis is sure a special talent. Against the run, the pass, as sure a tackler as there is in this league - the guy does it all. A throwback player in a modern day body. Very, very good stuff.
* Yikes. Jake Delhomme has 11 turnovers in his last two starts. I can't see him keeping his job past next week if he were to crap the bed once more. Road games at Atlanta and at Dallas are on tap for the Panthers.
* To conclude, two great finishes on Monday Night Football. San Diego continues its slow-starting ways by needing a late touchdown drive to topple the Raiders. Earlier, the Patriots extended their winning streak over the Bills to 12 games by scoring twice in the span of just a few minutes late in the 4th quarter. Let the Tom Brady love fest begin, but that victory doesn't happen if the Bills simply protect the football on a kick return late in the game. The Pats will be competitive this year - no doubt about that. But they're not going to blindside the league like they did in 2007. Or will they? I don't see it, but they very well could get off to a 5-0 record (@NYJ, ATL, BAL, @DEN) before hosting the Tennessee Titans in Week 6.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
pats won't go 5-0
Jets are better than you think, so is Baltimore, and the ATL has at least even odds at beating them.
Even tho it was the bills, they man-handled both sides of the line and I don’t think ESPN’s favorite QB will make it out of the first 5 games of the season intact.
I'd say
The Falcons have a better chance at beating NE than do the Jets. Although, the Jets game is in NJ and the Falcons go into NE.
" I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Salty Browns Fan.
by John Stephens on Sep 15, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions
i dont think pats are untouchable
but i do think their schedule sets up in a way where they could start 5-0. Not likely as all three of their next games are tough ones. Anyway, lucky lucky win for them tonight.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Sep 15, 2009 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions
If they start 5-0
Then they are for real; Atlanta, Jets, Ravens are tough matchups for the Patriots.
If what I saw last night holds up they will start 3-2 at best 4-1.
The defense was really bad.
Ravens Will Murder NE's O-line
Brady’s going to leave that game on a cart.
by Steelers in XLIV on Sep 15, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions
1st Round Drafted WRs
D. Hey-Bey-Bey (OAK) 0 recs 0 yds.
M. Crabtree (Uhh…SF?) 1-bowl of popcorn, 12-wings eaten while watching football on his couch
J. Maclin (PHI) 0 recs 0 yds
P. Harvin (MIN) 3 recs 36 yds
H. Nicks (NY) 2 recs 18yds
K. Britt (TEN) 8 recs 84 yds
I find it hilarious the top 3 drafted WRs did absolutely nothing. Our 3rd round pick in Wallace had 3 recs and 32 yards. Win.
" I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Salty Browns Fan.
Percy Harvin had 157 total yards and a touchdown. I wouldn't call that nothing.
Him or Sanchez will be rookie of the year.
I was looking at rec yards, since its kind of unfair to compare a return guy to a guy who is not running returns.
As Chicago Steeler said though, he was not top 3.
" I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Salty Browns Fan.
by John Stephens on Sep 15, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Eagles Defense
I hope LeBeau can still coach the Steelers defense as a ghost.
heh
whoops, yeah forgot he passed away. then again, it’s still ‘his defense’. fixed now. thanks.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Sep 15, 2009 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Just saw this gem on the SBN front page
Tom Brady blows of Suzy Kobler: video
More fuel to your Brady hate fire.
" I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Salty Browns Fan.
Like father, like son
He learned douchebaggery at the feet of the master.
helpin' Suzy get a workout
Heard Brady talking about Suzy gaining a few pounds, so he thought he’d take her for a jog… the douche … Like Blitz said, lucky, lucky win (but those count the same).
just my opinion... steelershark
by steelershark on Sep 15, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Encouraging to see
the Pats, Chargers, and Ravens all tied or trailing late to mediocre teams. At least we struggled with a tough opponent.
Maybe throw the Colts in there, though I’m not sure what kind of team the Jags are yet.
On the flip side the Eagles gave Jake Delhomme flashbacks to Nam, Minnesota blew out their cupcake, and Drew Brees wishes he could pass on a D-1 defense every day.
my thoughts exactly, mostly excited about the Pats struggling though, ravens i could careless we will beat them. Chargers pretty nice to see them struggling considering that we play them in about 3 weeks probably without Troy.
BUT
could it be that the powers of the NFL are starting to shift? That the bottom feeders are becoming average teams, and some of the elite teams are losing their dominance? We can’t tell after only one week but I think in a year or two the league is going to be more competitive
by Bleed-Black&Gold on Sep 15, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Hmmm....
NFC Player of the Week – Drew Brees. Easy choice there.
Too easy, some would say. Curiously easy.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Sep 15, 2009 10:49 AM EDT reply actions
hehe.
man crush lives on
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Sep 15, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Thoughts
I watched a good bit of football Sunday, and I couldn’t help but notice how good and deep the NFC was. In the AFC, we know the Browns, Bengals, Chiefs, Raiders, and Broncos are completely incompetant. The Dolphins and Texans are a notch up, but not all that serious of competitors. In the NFC, though, only the Lions and Rams fall into that category, and the only other team I could see putting in there are the 49ers, who just took down the reigning NFC champions.
Every team in the East is a SB contender (Redskins may be a bit of a stretch), and the Packers, Vikings, Bears (first game notwithstanding), Falcons, and Saints are all very solid teams. If we had to play NFC East defenses 6 times a year, Ben would be dead. Four times a year ago was too many. I like our chances in an AFC with fading giants (NE and Indy) and only the Ravens as a potential new superpower, but with our offense what it is, I think we’d be one of many in the NFC.
charity standing orders
Redskins and cowgirls will both suck
vikings will probably fade, once BF gets hit once or twice, the bears are paper tigers, and SF will probably win the west
I'd like to see
what happens when a competent run defense contains (note that I didn’t say “stops”) AD, and Favre has to throw more than five yards through the air.
or if they just try and strip the ball, 9 fumbles last year for AP
by Bleed-Black&Gold on Sep 15, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Even Superman has kryptonite.
Either way, this isn’t a game-plan that will work against a lot of teams – perhaps most of them. Do they have the discipline to keep running Peterson when they’re down by two scores to Rogers and the Pack? I know the Minnesota D is very good, but this is a Cleveland offense that went nearly 28 quarters without a touchdown. Sooner or later they’re going to need to pass, and they’ll be putting the game in the hands of a 38-year-old INT-happy gunslinger who knows as much about the offense as the ball-boy.
The Vikings will get the #1 seed and homefield in the NFC.
They have the best D in the NFC, the best player in the league in Peterson. That defense won’t allow Rogers to be up by 2 touchdowns. Perfect game plan against the Browns and when they need Favre to throw, he will come through.
Anyone that doesn’t think Minnesota is a Super Bowl contender is basing that on their hatred of Favre’s shenanigans and not by his play on the field.
It's not "hatred" to
see that he’s slow, out of sync, can’t possibly be familiar with the offense, and that he literally hasn’t thrown the ball past the ten-yard marker once. And all due respect to the Minnesota defense, but they’re known for the run, not the pass. They allowed 7.1 YPA last year, behind New Orleans of all teams. You can pass them, and Rodgers certainly know how to throw a ball.
Considering that he played in this offense for 16 years
He’s more familiar with this offense than the coaches themselves.
That defense was 6th in the entire league even though they had no qb to keep them off the field and without arguably their best defender E.J Henderson.
By the end of the year, they will have the best defense in the NFC because of Favre connecting on those third downs and letting Peterson run wild because of defenses no longer putting 9 man in the box.
THIS, is what Favre truly brings to this team. Anyone who says otherwise is not being objective because of their opinions on Favre’s skiping of trainning camp.
Huh?
He’s barely been a Viking for 16 days, let alone years.
You’re not talking sense anymore. It’s like arguing with Peter King or John Madden.
Uh-huh.
Right down to the terminology too, I bet. I heard they share playbooks before games too.
Nobody uses the “same” offense, unless theyprocess enjoy the challenge of the defense knowing every audible call.
by Desroko on Sep 15, 2009 4:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You've just proved right there that you don't know what you're talking about
Look it up. This is the exact same offense he’s been running for 16 years. You’re just another Favre hater. Watch out for the Vikings, #1 seed and homefield by the end of the year. Mark my words.
Disagree about the Redskins. The Giants looked like the better team, but they absolutely could not put the game away. The stats are startling similar (really the Giants just ran a few more plays), and main difference in the game was that the Giants returned their fumble recovery for a TD.
The Giants have a great OL, but they were given all they could handle by Haynesworth, Orakpo and co. The Redskins have an efficient, balanced offense, a very good DL and secondary. Like I said, Super Bowl might be a reach, but they would probably win a lot of other divisions.
charity standing orders
Redskins have a balanced offense?
Yeah, I guess so, BMF. They don’t run the ball very well. They don’t pass very well. Their receivers don’t run routes very well, and – except for Cooley – they don’t hang on to the ball very well either. Cooley and Portis are the only two guys on their offense worth mentioning.
Agreed that Haynesworth is a huge (in more ways than one) upgrade over last year and Orapko is going to be a total beast…but their secondary still misses Sean Taylor – and Carlos Rogers makes Ike Taylor look like Mr Gluefingers.
Most of all, this team lacks supporting players. Snyder and his incompetent GM Vinny Cerrato blow their wad every year on some big bucks guy — they spent a fortune on Adam Archuleta and let go Ryan Clark — they spent waaay to much on Randle El — then they gave up a second round draft choice for Jason Taylor — and now they spent megabucks on Haynesworth. But they mortgaged the future.
People in Washington seem to think that Dan Snyder is the anti-Christ, the way he has screwed up this franchise. I don’t know about that, but I do know the Skins are the anti-Steelers. They spend big bucks for quick fixes and don’t build from within.
They sure could have used that Number Two this year that they gave away last year so that Jason Taylor could play seven or eight games!
And they have NO depth at all. It’s a long season. And when injuries strike – as they always do – this very mediocre team will fall from the pace faster than a speed horse down the stretch at the Belmont.
BMF, this year, like most years, the Skins have a one way ticket to Nowheresville. Six or seven wins. At best.
Well, against a very good defense on the road, their offense was more consistent than ours. Remember what the Giants’ D did to us without their best player last year. Cambell is a solid QB, and he had a good game, despite one bad decision with the ball and one play that he should have stepped up in the pocket. Portis also had a solid day running the ball, again, against a very good defense.
While I’d agree about the depth issues, I have to diagree about a lack of supporting players. They have Moss, ARE, Cooley and some young WR’s. On DL, Carter, Griffin, and Golston are nothing to sneeze at, they have 3 very good DB’s in Horton, Landry, and Rogers, and a couple solid LB’s. Their biggest problem is probably in pass protection (made worse by Cambell’s tendency to fumble), but the consistent running game takes some of the pressure away from that.
I don’t see them as a Super Bowl contender, and the wheels may fall off sooner with injuries or later with cap problems, but for now, I’d take them seriously. They’d be able to push for a division title in a lot of divisions.
charity standing orders
I don’t see them as a SB contender either, but I will say that I think Jason Campbell’s talent is going to waste.
He has a massive arm and although he’s quiet I think he’s steady. He just has never had a chance to really settle into an offense because Washington has been a circus under Snyder, and now Zorn will probably get fired before the year is out to further slow his development.
I could easily see Campbell as one of these guys (like Kerry Collins) who finally lands in the right place later in his career, blossoms, and everyone says “Where has this guy been all these years?”
by Steelers in XLIV on Sep 15, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions
And the Chin will be their next HC
He will not be able to turn down the mega millions that Snyder will offer him even though his dream job in Carolina will probably be there for the taking, too.
The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games
by chewiesteeler on Sep 15, 2009 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Seattle will win the west
They’re back as Nfc west rulers long as they can stay healthy at key positions.
Jets could be this year's ATL
I know it is only one game, but Sanchez has looked good all pre-season and RexRyan should get the D playing mean, at least. Or maybe I have my Pats Hater glasses on too tight
nah, if the Bills can do that to the Pats in NE, the Jets have a WAY better defense than Buf and overall better team, I am crossing my fingers for the same thing
by Bleed-Black&Gold on Sep 15, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Not much ...
to cuss about here; good points all. I’m certainly not going to sign these folks up as playoff teams, but I don’t necessarily think that the Bengals and Browns should start thinking about next year’s draft yet. Bengals lost on a fluke to a weaker but not totally anemic Broncos team and the Browns lost to a Vikings team that many pundits think will compete for the Lombardi.
That’s funny, because the Broncos were beating the Bengals the entire game. Had Orton not taken an untimely sack in the fourth quarter, we go up 9-0 with 4 minutes left.
Denver was the better team that day. Don’t give me this “luck” excuse. If a Bengal defensive player snags that ball for a pick 6 it wouldn’t be chalked up to “luck.” But when Stokley makes the play of the week, he is the luckiest guy ever. Luck is when preparation meets opportunity.
Go Broncos!
(p.s. please try to set a new INT record against Cutler next week, kthx)
Palmer and the Bengals
I’m not ready to write off this team. I for one am glad that the next time we face them, in week 10, will be at home. I have a feeling that this team will gel and not be the creampuff we’ve come to enjoy the last couple of years.
Actually, we face the Bengals @Cincy in 2 weeks.
I still can’t get over how awful the Bengals looked against a Denver team with one of the worst D’s in the league and Kyle Orton at quarterback.
Cincy playing at home to start the season off, Carson back, all those receivers, top 10 defense.
Didn’t watch the game closely so, i can’t judge what happened there and say whether Cincy just sucks again or what.
Either way, hopefully, they don’t improve all that much by the time they play against us.
Denver’s Defense could be improved….I think it is early to judge them…they have a new coaching staff in place and a lot of new faces on the defense.
Yes, they were horrible last year, but many things have changed in the Mile High City.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by Frank Mineo (DYMS) on Sep 15, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with you on that…I think Orton is the classic game manager…if you build a solid team around him he could be a very serviceable starter, he just isn’t going to win you a lot of games.
Look what Orton did his and Big Ben’s rookie season; while Ben rattled off 15 straight victories, Orton was quietly leading his team to 10-5 record as a starter. He is since 12-7 starting for the bears & broncos. He might not be a pretty player but he seems to find ways to win more games than lose them.
I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!
by Frank Mineo (DYMS) on Sep 16, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Waay too early to write off Cincy....
Palmer back, monster draft. Solid defense.
They looked good in pre-season (yeah, I remember that last year’s only unbeaten pre-season team was Detroit), and they are clearly a work in progress. They have a huge upside, but there’s not a large enough body of work there to know if they’ll reach it.
They might be a very good team to bet against the spread this year. Constant underdog with small fan base, underrated, good defense: that usually translates into bargains at the window. They beat the spread last week, even though they lost the game. They’ll continue to beat the spread. Whether they’ll be good enough to win remains to be seen.
Cincy
So hard to say. I only caught a couple moments of the game, including the heartbreak finish. I think though that the Bengals may be suffering from the same type of Cinderalla performance syndrome that the Browns had last year.
When you suddenly show up as everyone’s surprise team without having earned it, it can come back on you.
I see Cincy doing better than last year, but finishing the season no better than 8-8.
by SteelerBuddha on Sep 15, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions

by 















