Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Steelers Post-Game Review: The Offense, Part 1 of 2

Let's put last Sunday's loss to the Bears behind us tomorrow and begin to look ahead at next week's divisional game against the Bengals, but I wanted to first write about what I saw out of the offense, starting with quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. There was plenty of good and plenty of bad alike in Sunday's loss, but for the second week in a row, I felt Roethlisberger more than did enough to help lead his team to victory. He made a few mistakes - the interception in the 1st quarter, and the sack he took in the 4th quarter right before Jeff Reed's first missed field goal attempt. And Roetthlisberger uncharacteristically missed open receivers more than once. But accuracy has never been an issue really with Big Ben. Decision making has though, and once again, I thought he did an admirable job protecting the football while still making assertive, confident decisions in and out of the pocket.

There's more...

Star-divide

Ben Roethlisberger

Week 2 Stats: 23/35 (65.7%), 221 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT

2009 Stats: 58/78 (71.8%), 584 yards, 2 TDs, 3 INTs

Analysis: I thought Ben Roethlisberger played a pretty clean game against the Bears. Obviously he had a tremendous start to the contest, leading the Steelers down the field on a 13 play, 92-yard drive that consumed just over 8 minutes of game clock. After missing Holmes on his 2nd attempt of the game, Big Ben connected on his next seven passes on the drive. Credit Bruce Arians for drawing up an excellent first series that featured completions to five different Steelers receivers (Ward, Holmes, Miller, Moore, Spaeth). Credit Arians as well for his nicely designed 4th and goal play from the 1 yard line. 

Bearstd1_medium

Spaeth is highlighted above. David Johnson is in motion, with Tank Summers and Willie Parker in the backfield.

Bearstd2_medium

Big Ben fakes the handoff to FWP and rolls to his right. The Bears linebacker above has his eyes and his weight pointed in the direction of the Steelers backfield. Spaeth meanwhile has a full head of steam slipping to the back of the end zone.

Bearstd3_medium

Bearstd4_medium

By the time Chicago's defender has realized it's play-action and that he has an assignment dragging towards the back corner of the endzone, it's too late. Big Ben has seen Spaeth and aptly gets rid of it before the gap can be closed between Spaeth and the defender. 7-0 Steelers.

Big Ben picked up right where he left off when the Steelers got the ball again following a Bears punt. Ben hit his next three passing attempts, including a gorgeous 3rd and long conversion to Hines Ward over the middle for 21 yards. At that point, Ben looked better than ever and Pittsburgh was knocking on the door again at the Bears 38 yard line. It appeared as if the Steelers were going to get at least 3 points there and really turn up the heat on Jay Cutler and the Bears offense to play from behind.

Then Big Ben threw a momentum changing pick. I originally wrote that I thought Big Ben had perhaps gotten a bit greedy and gone for the homerun ball to Wallace after going through his progressions. Turns out that wasn't quite the case. Let's take a look at what happened instead.

Bearsint1_medium

As we see here in the opening frame right after the snap, left tackle Max Starks is lined up pretty far outside - at least in comparison to where the rest of the play in the trenches is unfolding. It's pretty hard to see from this angle, but there's a good three or four yards between Starks and the left guard. At this point, Willie Parker has to see that Starks doesn't need any help chipping his man if he takes him wide. Big Ben would have had plenty of time and room to step up in to the pocket if that happened. Instead, he has to see that open space and figure that Starks' man is going to duck inside.

Bearsint2_medium

Parker misses the read though and has already begun to shade to his left rather than to step up in to the hole where there's the most glaring need for an extra body in front of Ben. Roethlisberger has already made up his mind to go deep at this point but in the National Football League, things close down in a split second and he has a man in his face disrupting his throwing motion before he can do anything about it.

I might also point out though that Charles Tillman is already in full-fledged retreat mode and is kicking it into high gear knowing Wallace's speed. In other words, Wallace does not at all have Tillman in a compromised position when Big Ben decides to throw it to the endzone. Not a good decision by Roethlisberger. But perhaps even more importantly, Willie Parker has to do a better job picking up the pass rush. He's a veteran and should know these kinds of tendencies and subtleties by now, even if it all is unfolding extremely quickly in real time. 

Moving on..

Roetlisberger struggled with his accuracy for the rest of the game. He completed just three of his next nine passes before hitting Matt Spaeth for a 9 yard completion early in the 3rd quarter. It's worth noting that the rain started to come down fairly heavily during the 2nd quarter. Coach Tomlin would dismiss this as relevant, but it was undeniably obvious that Roethlisberger was suddenly missing on throws he usually makes easily. He missed Santonio Holmes on a few passes -

Big Ben did however make several impressive plays with his legs during the rest of the contest. The first came on a naked bootleg along the goal line at about the 5:30 mark with the score tied at 7-7. Again, a nice play call from Arians.

Bigbentd1_medium

A convincing ball fake by Big Ben, sucking the Bears outside linebacker in just enough to where he won't be able to catch Big Ben in time as he sprints to the goal line.

Bigbentd2_medium

There is one defender, Danieal Manning, who still very much has a play on Big Ben.  Still, I like Ben's chances in the open field with an under-sized defensive back more often than not.

Bigbentd3_medium

And that's why Big Ben is more than just an upper echelon quarterback in this league. He's a football player. While the Bears defender goes low, afraid to take Big Ben head on, Roethlisberger leaves it all on the field and sacrifices his body. By jumping over the top, the collision he takes with the other non-pansy Bears defenders pushes him over the goal line. That's our quarterback - one of the absolute best competitors in the league.

Roethlisberger made yet another big play with his legs when he converted a huge 3rd and 5 on the Steelers final drive of the game. There was 4:11 left on the clock and Pittsburgh had it on the Bears 38 yard line.

Bigbenrun1_medium

If you ask me, it's fairly problematic that we seem to feel most comfortable with Mewelde Moore in these late-game situations, but notice here how he does a nice job with his pass protection assignment, sticking his nose right in there and giving Ben enough room/time to decide what to do with the ball.

Bbrun4_medium

Ben decides to take off after noticing there's no defenders near the first down marker. There is however a Bears defensive lineman in hot pursuit. Big Ben kicks it in to high gear...

Bigbenrun2_medium

But he also instinctively knows that he needs to raise his legs as Anderson dives for his feet.

Bigbenrun3_medium

Roethlisberger then gives up his body once again stretching for the first down marker. He gets it by the nose of the football and the Steelers should have been in business to close the deal.

In conclusion, no matter what concerns we might have with the 2009 version of the Pittsburgh Steelers, I think we all have to feel fairly confident and comfortable that we have Ben Roethlisberger occupying the most important slot on an NFL roster - the quarterback position. He's been very, very good through two weeks of this year. And his solid performances have come against two good, if not great, defenses. The Titans and Bears certainly can be thought of as solid rush defenses, even if they've had their struggles defending the pass.

Anyway, if Roethlisberger can play at this high level for the remainder of the season the Steelers will be just fine. He's protecting the ball better than he did last year, he's getting more time from his offensive line to survey the field, he's still got that magic late in games and he's proven that he's healthy enough to make plays with his legs when there's no better options at his disposal. In short, he's playing like a franchise quarterback. If the other facets of the team continue to improve - even just incrementally - then the Steelers should again find themselves in playoff contention and have another shot at making a playoff run like they've been able to do with Roethlisberger under center in 2005 and 2008.

0 recs  |  Comment 46 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Whats up Steeler Nation? I’ve been reading this board for a while but I’ve never posted, so I’m kinda new. One of the better blogs that I’ve come around in a while.

as far as my assessment of the offense, it is what it is. arians will never be confused as being a great coordinator, neither will zierlien be viewed as a great o-line coach. they basically have to work with what they have, so don’t expect a major transformation overnight.

as improved as the o-line has looked, it still has a way to go. the offense won’t be consistent until the play up front is consistent. essex is better than stapleton, but he still gives up too much penetration. hartwig looks better at times, but he still gets knocked down and overpowered quite a bit. the left side looks good and colon is still a mauler. but the center and the RG have to play better.

the skill guys aren’t the problem, it’s the big boys that have to play better. as soon as they create more running lanes, you guys will see this offense take off. it would aslo help more if every defense we faced didn’t have 8 guys in the box almost every play.

by StoneColdSteel on Sep 23, 2009 1:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

Good post and welcome to BTSC!

The 8 men in the box situation is a big problem. Because BA seems to like to run at them a lot when they do that. Really though, I thought the offense in the Bears game would have been a 400 yard offense if it weren’t for the rain. It was clicking well enough. I just felt they actually didnt run enough.

I think the O-line is gelling a bit more and getting better. Give them time.

by Mechem on Sep 23, 2009 1:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hows peru man?

you still there? do i even have the so. american country right?

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Blitzburgh on Sep 23, 2009 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes ya do!

I just got back from a border hop in ecuador for a new visa. So I got 6 more months down here.

But alls good I found me a fellow fan born in the Burgh and we be watching the games together on Sundays. Good fellow.

Brought the FWP jersey and the towel down too… I get a lot of bizarre looks when I walk around with the jersey on gameday. Its soccer country.

by Mechem on Sep 23, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ben seems good to me

I think hes just knocking some of that early rust off. The INT’s and really bad sacks seem to just be him re-adjusting to the season.

He does take sacks but he’s taken some nasty ones two weeks running now. I think that will fade out.

And btw, w00t for being first and another good poast by the blitz.

by Mechem on Sep 23, 2009 1:27 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

INTs

Of the 3 picks, only 1 was the result of a bad throw, and none were poor decisions, i.e. throwing into coverage. This is not 2006 Ben not seeing defenders and throwing into double coverage.

He’ll still take the sacks though. Live by it and die by it. I’m not going to yell at him for holding the ball any more. That’s just the QB he is and probably will be for several more years.

by JHolmes on Sep 23, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sacks

Agreed on the INT’s… I wish we could introduce a rule change where the hailmary heave doesnt count on your stats.

But anyway on the sacks, seems like this years sacks have been significantly worse. Like 13 and 9 yards… thats pretty heavy. He’s gotta work on that. Last year he seemed like as the year went on he got better at throwing it away sometimes. I love how he plays, but sometimes you do gotta toss it. Especially when a FG is on the line.

by Mechem on Sep 23, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

I just don’t think he will change. It would be nice but I’m saying I’ll accept it either way.

by JHolmes on Sep 23, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As Coach Tomlin would say…
Ben is a gunfighter and sometimes gunfighters get shot.

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by drinkyourmilkshake on Sep 23, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sacks

I have no problem with Ben taking sacks to extend a play, UNLESS it comes at a point where doing so takes points of the board. The past two weeks, Ben failed to play situational football. He took two costly sacks that pushed us out of chipshot range. I think that he has to make better decisions during those two plays – no shame in throwing it away if it gets you 3.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 24, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Moore
If you ask me, it’s fairly problematic that we seem to feel most comfortable with Mewelde Moore in these late-game situations, but notice here how he does a nice job with his pass protection assignment, sticking his nose right in there and giving Ben enough room/time to decide what to do with the ball.

This still blows my mind. Why is it “problematic?” When are people, Tomlin and Arians included, going to figure out how good he really is. He’s the best Steeler RB on all 3 downs by far.

by JonathanJoseph on Sep 23, 2009 2:19 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

um, well..

You’re not getting my point. It’s not that it’s problematic that Moore is being deemed the best of the three options – if he is evaluated by the coaching staff as the best, then by all means, let him play.

HOWEVER, it’s problematic that Mewelde Moore is indeed potentially our best option at running back. That doesn’t bode well for a team that would like to win a Super Bowl.

Does that blow your mind?

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Blitzburgh on Sep 23, 2009 2:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

last year

There were weeks in 08 that Moore was easily the best option at runningback.

I know what you are saying, though. Even though the Steelers handled Chris Johnson in Week 1, you could still see the bigplay potential that exploded in Week 2.
The Steeler running game looked better in week 2, but either Parker or Mendy really need to outplay Moore.

It will be interesting to see how the Bengal D plays. They held Grant to 46 yards on 14 carries and Buckhalter/Moreno to 65 yards on 16 carries. In fact, the Bengals D is playing better than the offense.

by vherub on Sep 23, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We don't yet know what Mendy is capable off

I think that we may well see Mendy step into Moore’s territory and become a good – possibly even a great third down back. He is faster, stronger and has great hands. What he lacks at the moment is experience and the ability to block and make good reads out of the back-field.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 24, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The rotation pattern

I’m not sure about what we are doing with our rotation of FWP, Delish, and M&M, 1,2,3 through the game, more often than not utilizing M&M when we are in urgent late game situations. I do realize he has softer hands and is better in pass pro and then releasing for Ben’s check, and he has history with Tomlin (irrelevant by now), but I don’t have enough of an analytical eye to see how our blocking schemes are changing, if at all, to accomodate the plays we are running for each back, and how this translates to BA’s overall game plan.

What does occur to me however is that by rotating the backs so predictably we are really telegraphing to the opposing D what we will be running, and not helping us disguise our intentions very well.

by thedonger on Sep 23, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I see your point but I think having Willie Parker as your best option bodes even worse for a championship contender.

Mewelde Moore is a very good player. Look at your stills from the INT to Wallace above. Don’t you think MeMo makes the correct read on pickup in that situation? I sure do.

by Steelers in XLIV on Sep 23, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I want to see Mendy get more touches.

It baffles me that he has such a great drive in the third quarter, especially with the conditions, in his home state, and never see him touch the ball again. You gotta ride the hot back. Especially in that situation.

by Freddyd on Sep 23, 2009 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No I get your point...

but my point is that you are really underestimating Moore. Tiki Barber was once just a 3rd down back too and Moore is what makes the offense go. Being able to pass block and catch the ball like a WR makes the offense really hard to gameplan against and Moore is a very very underrated runner between the tackles.

That 15 yard run he had on 1st down was longer than any run FWP has this season. Just sayin…

by JonathanJoseph on Sep 23, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree but

Let’s not get too worked up over a small sample size. The long run Mendy had was the longest of the season. We have three guys who all have different skills. Parker has the most experience and has preformed at a high level in this league when healthy. That’s why he is getting put first in line. If he cannot perform – changes will be made, but I think the second game showed that Parker was doing OK.

What Parker really lacks is pass catching skills. I agree with you that this makes him somewhat of a liability on the field in first down, because it makes our game more one dimensional.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 24, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But that ship has already sailed....

Sorry, but FWP is done, finished, gone the way of Shaun Alexander. It happens to RBs and it has happened to FWP.

Parker has been bad enough to hurt the offense going back to halfway through 08. He was put first in line (even though they should have known that he was finished already) and I think it’s clear that he “cannot perform”.

Look at FWP’s career rushing averages. It was a steady decline and now its falling off a cliff. He’s done.

by JonathanJoseph on Sep 24, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not worried about Ben Roethlisberger.

He is fine and will be fine. It is all on the offensive-line to get things up to snuff.

Phillip Bunting
"Stairway To Seven"

by SteelersChatPack on Sep 23, 2009 2:36 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Looking at the photos, I think Ben actually made the right read. He has 7 guys in pass protection (5 plus Miller and Parker) against I believe 4 pass rushers. That means there are only 3 receivers going against 7 pass defenders, and theoretically he should have some time.

Not pictured above are a CB lined up on Holmes and a deep safety. The other safety is “in the box”. Without watching the video (can’t at work) to verify, I’m still fairly sure that Chicago is running a cover-3 zone, which is a run defense where the outside CB’s don’t get any help deep. Ward is the only WR in the middle of the field and is covered by 3 guys (and if I’m right about the cover-3, there’s a fourth close by), while Wallace and Holmes are running down the field against CB’s one safety.

Without know exactly what Holmes is doing or how well he’s being covered, I can’t say if there was a better option, but the fastest guy on our team one-on-one deep doesn’t sound like a bad matchup. Apparently 7 guys wasn’t enough to protect Ben (Starks should know that he has help to the outside) and that led to the INT, but if he puts the ball where it needs to be, it’s at worst an incomplete pass and possibly a touchdown. Holmes is probably in a similar situation on the left side, and Ward has 4 guys on him. What should Ben have done? I’d say take a chance deep.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 23, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oops, second paragraph should end “against CB’s and one safety”

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 23, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Going over the top against man coverage is definitely not a bad read of a play. But making the correct read on the coverage scheme does not equal must throw if the guy is covered. Ben was facing the route the whole way and liked the idea of giving his WR a chance to go up and make a play despite the coverage. You can’t tell if Holmes or Ward are open, but an inside pass rush move by the DE and linebackers dropping off also means he has Parker for a safe dump off that might gain a few yards (if he catches it). The only thing that’s an unknown in Ben’s favor in this case is that he might in fact have been trying to throw it so deep and tight to the sidelines that it was either going to be a miraculous catch by Wallace or out of bounds.

by steeler.lifer on Sep 23, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Considering Ben’s less than a second from being sacked in the second picture, he’s got to have made a decision by then. Ward has 2 guys on him. Parker is in the backfield and isn’t looking for a dumpoff. Miller is blocking. That leaves Holmes and Wallace as the only real options. We don’t know what Holmes is doing, but Wallace has single coverage deep. Throwing deep isn’t exactly a high percentage play, but if the ball is where it should be, it’s usually a TD or an incompletion.

While it’s better to throw to a wide open WR, it doesn’t look like there are any such options on this play. With nothing better to do, Ben threw down field hoping to get lucky. Unfortunately, he got unlucky, getting hit earlier than he should have, and underthrew his guy for the pick. If he didn’t throw deep, he probably would have gotten sacked, which could have resulted in similar field position for the Bears anyway.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 24, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we can agree to disagree. When you have seven blocking four, as Ben could tell at the snap, then either Miller or Parker should be free for an easy catch. It wasn’t Miller in this case. And with Parker it’s never an easy catch anyway. However I’m sure going to Wallace was Ben’s first inclination and if he sensed pressure, he might have thought the safest thing to do was chuck it deep and possibly beyond everyone. I don’t like the thought process of trying to get lucky and I think you’re right, that’s just what Ben was trying to do.

by steeler.lifer on Sep 24, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Steeler.lifer, I agree but ...

it wasn’t Ben’s fault that Reed missed 2 field goals and Santonio dropped that TD pass. That’s 13 points that were left on the field that wasn’t Ben’s fault. This team had a more than its fair share of chances to put this game away and it didn’t. Hopefully they can learn from this moving fwd.

by datruth4life on Sep 24, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not to nitpick

but that’s really 10 points left on the field since Holmes’ drop was the play before one of Reed’s misses.

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Sep 25, 2009 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice wrap up ...

and I’m ready to look to the Bengals as well. We played two very good football teams in weeks one and two. If anyone thought these would be gimmes and the Steelers would run the table, well, those expectations are just unrealistic. Bears defense is more than Urlacher and played a solid game, both against the Pack and the Steelers. With the exception of broken pass coverage in a critical sitch against the Pack, the Bears would be 2-0 … having beaten two very good teams. We need points and just like last year we can’t have our defense trying to make 10, 14 or 17 points hold up. That is too much to ask of them. Bengals lit up a pretty good Pack defense; it doesn’t mean they will light us up, but it will be a more interesting Steelers v. Bengals matchup.

I too, am not sure why we should be concerned that Mighty Mewelde might be our ride to The Bowl. He is a solid multi-purpose threat … reminds me of a certain running back from the 70s whose multi-purpose talents helped the Steelers reach NFL nirvana.

by tenthmtnman on Sep 23, 2009 7:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I love these breakdowns

Great job.

But I think we can reel in our enthusiasm for the fourth and one play on the goal-line. Most teams could roll into the endzone without the benefit of snazzy playcalling.

by 13thieves on Sep 23, 2009 8:53 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That isn’t true at all. Some can.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 23, 2009 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blitz

Good breakdown. I agree with the general thesis: the things we were worried about preseason (offensive line, playcalling) have performed above expectations while the things we’ve done successfully for a long time (Ben) we’re not worried about.

Personally, I think Wallace had Tillman beat, but didn’t locate or adjust to the underthown ball. I don’t know if we’ll ever know for sure because the pass was so short, though.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 23, 2009 9:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

We’ve now seen Ben underthrow Wallace twice in two games on routes that could have been touchdowns.

I think it’s Ben that has to adjust to the apparent fact that Wallace is the fastest receiver he’s ever played with. He will make that adjustment and when he does, look out.

by Steelers in XLIV on Sep 23, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think that being hit by a huge man while throwing tends to make you miss.

Willie Colon - top 2 RT in the NFL

by steelguy99 on Sep 23, 2009 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ben definitely underthrew Wallace, but he also should have thrown it to the outside since Tillman took away the inside. But the bad throw was ultimately a cause of being hit while throwing.

I still maintain that until our guys up front can consistently win their one on one battles, we won’t be as good as we should be. They’ve done a good job so far on blitz pick up so they’ve gotten better in that area. But I still say Essex and Hartwig have to play better for us to open up more running lanes.

by StoneColdSteel on Sep 23, 2009 10:47 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Blitz, I still think Ben's pick was because he was hit ...

not because it was a bad decision to Wallace. I think Alex Brown hit Ben at the same time that he released it, which caused the ball to be short. If Wallace was looking back like the CB was, he might have been able to break it up, but he was still trying to get separation. But with that CB looking back, I still believe that Wallace was about to blow by him for six if the ball is out in front.

Let’s hope the rookie learns from that. It’ll be interesting to see if the OL and running game can continue to improve. That was a decent step from Week 1 to Week 2. I

‘m also wondering how D. LeBeau will deal with the bubble passes and smoke screens to offset the blitzes that the Steelers bring. They’re going to get that from here on out so they have to make adjustments. In this game of chess, the next move is on LeBeau.

Ike and Gay are going to have to play some press coverage at the line of scrimmage on 1st and 2nd down, or Carson Palmer will take that cushion and play pitch and catch for 7 to 8 yards on those downs all day.

by datruth4life on Sep 23, 2009 11:57 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree. It really looks like Wallace will be open if Ben doesn’t get hit right there. I’m not worried about this game.

by Cols714 on Sep 23, 2009 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah i mean obviously

the pick was a result of him being hit. Guess he didnt have enough time because of the missed block by FWP to really make a sound decision there.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Blitzburgh on Sep 23, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The bottom line is

the margin of victory in the NFL is usually very, very small. Games come down to a few plays.

Last year we made most of those plays and made them at the right time, offensively and defensively.

Bears game. Reed misses 2 field goals, we lose. If he makes the first one, we go up by 10 and most likely, win another close one. I see the Bears game as no different than some of last seasons games. We made some good plays. Made some bad ones. Except, and this is obviously huge, we missed 2 field goals.

Case closed. We can analyze every play of the game, but the fact reamins if he makes the FG we would have beaten a very tough opponent on the road. I feel most of our remaining games will play out the same way…close games, we’ll make some good plays, we’’ ll make some bad plays, we’ll do things that could cost a victory (missed FG’s, fumbles, int, penalities), and hopefully, like last year, more often than not, we’ll make a play at the opportune time to get the “W”.

by SteelerMike on Sep 23, 2009 5:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No problem with Ben, but....

The Steelers aren’t scoring enough points. They seem to be playing down to the level of whatever team they face, instead of closing out games when they have good opportunities. The Bears should never have been close enough to win that game, even if you forget the two missed FGs.

I’d say the offense looks about the same as last year. Sometimes they march right down the field and score with ease, but most of the time, they sputter when they get anywhere close to paydirt. Absolutely no consistent theme or identity.

No doubt they’ve got the talent and the OL isn’t as bad as some people say. I blame a sucky offensive scheme, not the players. Arians should decide what kind of offensive character he wants to establish and stop changing gears 5 or 6 times every game. I think the best adjective to describe the Arians offense is “schizophrenic.”

I doubt that another 14-point showing will do the trick against the Bungles, even as bad as they are.

by Billy52 on Sep 23, 2009 9:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This part is on the running game....
I’d say the offense looks about the same as last year. Sometimes they march right down the field and score with ease, but most of the time, they sputter when they get anywhere close to paydirt. Absolutely no consistent theme or identity.

Go back through last year and think about the times the offense was scoring with ease. Mewelde Moore was on the field. Look at when the offense is sputtering and its when Willie Parker is putting the offense in constant 3rd and longs. This should be obvious.

by JonathanJoseph on Sep 24, 2009 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This game it was the Ben to Holmes connection that failed a lot of drives. We didn’t run that much this game, but when we did, a lot of the time we had some success.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Sep 24, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big Ben has done his job

Big Ben has carried the Steelers Offense so far, and if Santonio Holmes held on to the touchdown pass things would have been different and also Mike Wallace caught what would have been a first down if he was aware of where he was, but instead he hesitated and ran out of bounds 2 yards short, and Steelers got no score

by waldoshot on Sep 23, 2009 10:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Still wonder who will get the goal-line short yardage carries

Whether you like him or kickoffs or not, Gary Russell more often than not did pick up the short-yardage and goal-line stuff when he was used. I don’t know if this team has one of those among its 53 right now.

I do like the improvement from the OL and running game from Week 1 to Week 2, but FWP still doesn’t look like the same back to me. The door is wide open for Mendy. FWP can’t block and doesn’t give you anything in the passing game or short-yardage game. If he wants some tick on the field, it is there for the taking.

by datruth4life on Sep 24, 2009 1:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What if...

….although it probably won’t happen, we go into the No Huddle to start the game, similar to what we did in the 2005 Playoff Game against Indy and how we were in the last few minutes of the game vs. Tennessee? We’ve moved the ball quite well in that instance and with Ben being able to scramble and shed would-be tacklers like he can, that would allow us to jump on Cinci early and take their hearts out of the game being that they’re going to be riding high on confidence and emotion when the game begins and their defensive linemen will be sucking wind by the middle of first half. Also, that fatigue will also open up the run game for us allowing our big boys to lean on the defensive front of the Bengals and bully them into submission. Just a thought….

Who ride? WE RIDE!

by Peezie on Sep 26, 2009 8:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Fear_the_turtle_small
BTSC March Madness Tournament Challenge
Small
BTSC 2010 NFL Mock Drafts : Updated 03/04 (4 round edition)
Girl-tv1_small
A Look at the Steelers' Future Salary Cap Situation
Woodley_small
It starts from the Inside

Recent FanPosts

Small
Steelers need to draft a QB
Small
POST FA/COMBINE BOOM MOCK DRAFT
Small
Good Free Agents - Stupid Ben
Btsc_pic_small
Okay, folks, it's time for the BTSC nation to band together.
Small
Limas Sweed
Ape_thinking_small
Is Randle El Ice Cream?
Small
I am so ticked off at Big Ben
Small
Steelers FO aces with Clark and Allen
Photo_small
Ramblings of an unusual offseason
Miketomlin-200_small
Free Agency Open Thread Day 5

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Arrowhead Pride
Eric Berry Likes Chiefs CB Brandon Flowers
Gang Green Nation
Jets To Meet With Brodney Pool
Mile High Report
Broncos sign DE Jarvis Green

SPONSORS


Site Founder & Editor

Me2_small Blitzburgh

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake