Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Seahawks Trade for TE Kellen Winslow

The Steelers win when Parker runs the ball well - the numbers


Yes, that’s a simple statement. But using the yards per carry (ypc) statistic, the numbers bear it out. I like ypc because it shows, on average, what the runner contributes each time he carries the ball, not just some generic total for the whole game. 120 yards on 35 carries looks more impressive, and more misleading, than 3.4 ypc. Ypc isn’t a complete stat, but it is more informative than simply looking at yards.

 

The ypc stat shows that success is iffy with Parker as the main guy these days. In a nutshell, the Steelers are 22-6 (75%) when Parker averages at least 4.0 ypc, and only 16-14 (53%) when he doesn’t. From nearly always winning to a crap shoot.

 

Parker became the feature back at the start of the 2005 season. He put up big seasons from 2005 through 2007, but has dropped off significantly since then.

 

2005 - 2007

 

2005 – 1,202, 4.7 ypc (8th in NFL)

2006 – 1,494, 4.4 ypc (12th in NFL)

2007 – 1,316, 4.1 ypc (25thT in NFL)

 

During this time, the Steelers went 18-6 (75%) when he hit that 4.0 ypc mark. They were 10-11 (48%) when he came in under 4.0 ypc. That’s a major difference.

 

SINCE THEN

2008 – 791, 3.8 ypc (40thT in NFL)

2009 – 66, 2.4 ypc (47th in NFL)

 

I know, he was injured a big chunk of 2008 and we’re only two games into 2009, but it shows he struggled when the Steelers relied on him last year and so far this year. In 2005 and 2006 he was about a top ten back in the NFL, but has been dropping since then and cannot be considered an elite runner.

 

From 2005 – 2007, Parker averaged 4.0 ypc or better 24 times. He averaged less than that 21 times. For a top back, barely hitting the 4.0 ypc mark half the time is not impressive. However, it’s gotten much worse.

 

In his 13 games since the start of 2008, he’s hit the 4.0 ypc mark 4 times. The Steelers are 4-0 in those games. He’s failed to get at least 4.0 ypc 9 times, with the Steelers going 6-3.

 

THE POST SEASON

2005 – 1 game 4.0 ypc or better, 3 games less than that.

2008 – 1 game 4.0 ypc or better, 2 games less than that.

 

So, he’s gotten 4.0 ypc or more in 2 out of 7 post season games. Fortunately, the Steelers are 7-0 in those games, with two Super Bowls, but except for San Diego last year and the 75 yard scamper against Seattle, Parker has not helped the team win those games. In fact, he’s even been under 3.0 ypc in 4 of the 7 games.

 

LONG RUNS

Even this pre-season, pundits were still trotting out the ‘He can go all the way on every carry’ tripe. Runs of 20 yards or more:

 

2005 – 11 (1 per 23 carries)

2006 – 15 (1 per 22 carries)

2007 – 12 (1 per 27 carries)

2008 –   4 (1 per 53 carries)

2009 – None so far

 

I don’t know what a good average would be, but for 2005 – 2007, based on his carries per game, it was reasonable to expect Willie to rip off a long run a little less than once a game. That absolutely vanished last year.

 

ONE RELATED THOUGHT – THE ARIANS FACTOR

I’ve been rough on Parker (because I’ve always believed he doesn’t move the chains, which the ypc argument helps support), but I believe that Bruce Arians has been part of the problem.

 

At the start of 2007, Bruce Arians replaced TREMENDOUS blocker Dan Kreider with Carey Davis. Davis was a better receiver and runner (though Arians didn’t use him for a lot of either), but he was nowhere near as good a blocker as Kreider.

 

In 2008, Davis was replaced in the backfield with converted tight end Sean McHugh (I still don’t get that).

 

So far in 2009, Arians has either gone with no blocking back or Frank Summers (a runner in college who, as Mike Logan has repeatedly pointed out on AM 1250, has been a terrible blocker).

 

Arians gave a recent interview essentially saying he doesn’t have a use for the fullback and won’t be using one in Pittsburgh. So, beginning in 2007, he has systematically taken away a key blocker from Parker, which I believe, has contributed to his decline.

 

IS IT TIME TO MAKE A CHANGE?

 

Parker has averaged about 1.4 catches per game as the feature back, so he’s not an aid in the passing game. Based solely on games I’ve watched/listened to and press stories, I don’t think Parker is a very good blocker, so he doesn’t seem to help the team much there.

 

Parker is an aging back, with recent injury problems, putting up declining numbers, with few long runs, doesn’t play a part in the passing game, and isn’t really much of a blocker. Mewelde Moore has averaged 4.1 ypc in his two years with the Steelers and he’s certainly played a part in the passing game since joining the team. I also think Moore has been a pretty good blocker when he’s stayed in the backfield on passing downs.

 

It would appear that Mendenhall is the future of the running game if he’s good enough to carry the load. With Parker struggling more and more, as shown by the numbers, I think it’s time for Moore and Mendenhall to hold down the backfield. The Steelers win when Parker gets 4.0 ypc, but he doesn’t do that very often anymore.


Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I'm not a Praker hater by any means.

I really like Willie, but afraid he isn’t the offensive weapon he used to be! How long can we keep saying "he"ll get better", or, “he’ll have a break-out game soon”? Feels like I’ve been telling myself that forever now. I know the offensive line isn’t creating the holes it should be, but his play has really dropped off and I feel it may be time to change things up!

The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done."
-George Carlin

by Cdsumm on Sep 25, 2009 11:21 AM EDT reply actions  

Sorry, "Parker hater"

The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done."
-George Carlin

by Cdsumm on Sep 25, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have never been too crazy about the YPC stat for just one game. If a running back get 25 yards on 15 carries and then breaks one for 70 he ends up with a stat line of 16 carries for 95 yards even though he was largely ineffective for the game. When you look at the YPC that would be 5.9 yards per carry and the small sample size of an individual game makes the stat very misleading sometimes.

I'll drink your Milkshake, I'll drink it up!

by Frank Mineo (DYMS) on Sep 25, 2009 11:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Title says it all
When

When will it happen? Never. Time for the next coming of Franco Harris……..Stefan Logan.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Sep 25, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

***biting tounge***

agreed

The very existence of flamethrowers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, "You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done."
-George Carlin

by Cdsumm on Sep 25, 2009 1:32 PM EDT reply actions  

True

True That is a valid point. The Seattle Super Bowl is the perfect example. 9.3 ypc for the game, 2.0 when you take away the one long TD run.

I thought about taking out the longest run of each game and recomputing the ypc, but that diminishes the fact that he did have at least one significant run during the game. And that long run does matter.

The fact that the ypc continues to decline, even with the ocassional long run ‘skewing’ the average just further reinforces the point of the post, I think.

by upabob on Sep 25, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah but again goddamit the OL declined too

Again I hate all the parker hate. What has Mendy done? Memo always faces 3rd and 7 in the box fronts while we run Parker into 8-9 men…

From 05-06 we lost Hartings, 06-7 Faneca, 8-9 Simmons.

The YPC stat declining is a direct result in a lack of OL upgrades.

Parker was kicking ass all 07 mind you. Played the toughest sched all last year.

by Mechem on Sep 25, 2009 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

True

That is a valid point. The Seattle Super Bowl is the perfect example. 9.3 ypc for the game, 2.0 when you take away the one long TD run.

I thought about taking out the longest run of each game and recomputing the ypc, but that diminishes the fact that he did have at least one significant run during the game. And that long run does matter.

The fact that the ypc continues to decline, even with the ocassional long run ‘skewing’ the average just further reinforces the point of the post, I think.

by upabob on Sep 25, 2009 2:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Oops - wrong info: Touchdowns

Pasted in the wrong thing. One item I have found perplexing is the variation in Parker’s running TDs.

2005 – 4
2006 – 13
2007 – 2
2008 – 5

Coaching attitudes changing on using Parker near the end zone every year?

by upabob on Sep 25, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

05 Had the Bus in house taking them all. 06 Parker did well, then 07 they went to using Dookie a lot of the year. And last year featured Gary Russell later in the year while parker got more toward the early side.

by Mechem on Sep 25, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Horrible play selection most of the time

Parker’s not the problem. I don’t think any team in the NFL can stop the Steelers’ passing attack—except maybe the Steelers themselves. Watch how many times during each game that Arians completely changes gears. He absolutely refuses to stick with plays that are working. It’s enough to drive you crazy! And when they move the ball inside the Red Zone—forget it! The plays called usually make them go in reverse.

This team has loads of talent; it just needs better coordination on offense.

by Billy52 on Sep 26, 2009 10:58 PM EDT reply actions  

I will say it again

Parker really hasn’t changed that much, he may be a step slower but still pretty darn fast.
He has never been great at “finding” holes and he has never been over elusive. FWP’s greatest strength has always been and will always be hitting a nice hole at full speed and running by everyone. His stats from previous years so as much a decline in the run blocking ability in the OL as they do a decline in his abilities. I have always liked FWP but I have never felt he was “the guy” I think he is a great change of pace back. I think the title is accurate not matter what name is in there. The Steelers win when _ runs the ball well. Our run game will improve as teams start to fear the pass and quit jamming the line. We are not built like the great teams of the past though. If we can get anywhere near top 10 in rushing combined with our passing game we will be very tough to beat.

by DarinS on Sep 27, 2009 12:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Another in the loser column

During the game, I told a friend over the phone that Parker looked to be back in his 2005 form. And yet, once again, another game of less than 4.0 ypc. He averaged 3.7 ypc. Without that very nice 24 yarder, it was only 2.9 ypc.

In the third quarter, Parker had 6 carries for 14 yards (2.3 ypc). And that’s WITH a 10 yarder.

In the fourth quarter, he had 5 carries for 7 yards (1.4 ypc). Much like the Super Bowl last year, with the Steelers in control and only needing to run down the clock, Parker flamed out. 11 carries fo 21 yards (1.9 ypc) in the second half. Geez.

In his 14 games since the start of 2008, he’s hit the 4.0 ypc mark 4 times. The Steelers are 4-0 in those games. He’s failed to get at least 4.0 ypc 10 times, with the Steelers going 6-4.

by upabob on Sep 28, 2009 7:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo