Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Russell Westbrook and Kevin Durant's Post-Game 5 Outfits

Steelers Hope To Find Similar Offensive Success As They Did Against Chargers Last Year (Part 1)

When the Steelers and the Chargers square off at Heinz Field Sunday night, it will be the third meeting between the two teams in the past fourteen games. All three will have been at Heinz Field. And hopefully, just hopefully, the Steelers will play one of their better offensive games the past season and a half on Sunday like they did the previous two times the two teams tangled.

Img11111487_medium
It was Week 11 when San Diego and Pittsburgh met for the first time last season.  The Steelers won 11-10 in a nail biter than featured no offensive touchdowns by the Steelers, merely three Jeff Reed field goals and a safety by James Harrison. Some might scoff at the notion that Pittsburgh played a very good offensive game that day - how can I say that when they failed to get in to the endzone even once?

Well, first of all, remember the context of when that game happened in the season and what the Steelers had done in the first ten weeks. The Steelers were 6-3 heading in to the game, but had lost two of their last three games to the Giants and Colts due to costly turnovers by BIg Ben and poor pass protection that probably played a role in some of his unfavorable decision making. Remember also that Roetlisberger played just one half - and an abysmally poor one at that - in the Steelers victory against Washington that was sandwiched between the two losses.

So, even though Roethlisberger and the offense didn't finish off a single touchdown during the Week 11 regular season win over San Diego, it was an extremely welcome sight to see how he performed. Let's remind ourselves of his performance...

Star-divide

Big Ben's Line 11/16/2008 - 31 of 41 (75.6%) , 308 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs

Nothing spectacular, by any means. But it was important to see Roethlisberger protect the football...i.e. not throw bone-headed picks in Steelers territory that gift wrapped cheap points for offenses that were otherwise struggling to muster much against our defense.

Img11111507_mediumBig Ben was sacked four times that day, but two of them I believe were sacks where Ben held on to the ball way too long, perhaps in an attempt to make sure he didn't throw any costly interceptions. The offensive line played probably their best game of the year since the Jacksonville game. Willie Parker ran for 115 yards on 25 carries. The 115 yards were his third highest regular season total last year, and the 25 carries equaled the second most attempts he had in a regular season game last year. The Steelers offensive line didn't dominate, but they more than held their own in both departments - pass protection and run blocking. The Steelers finished the contest with an impressive 410 yards of offense. 

So how did they only put up 9 offensive points? Well, it never helps to get shut down at the goal line on 4th down, which happened when Mewelde Moore failed to crack the plane in the 2nd quarter. The Steelers were also forced to kick a field goal at the end of the 1st half as they were knocking on the door at the San Diego 3 yard line. Another huge problem that day was penalties. Pittsburgh was penalized 13 times for 115 yards. Pittsburgh had a drive early in the 2nd half stall because of penalties. They were forced to punt from the Chargers 38 yard line rather than marching on for another field goal attempt or even 6 points. They then had a touchdown wiped off the board (a 4 yard run by FWP) due to offensive holding. That drive resulted in 3 points too. You get the picture - the scoreboard didn't accurately reflect how the Steelers dominated most of the game, or how the offense was doing a very good job for the most part possessing and moving the ball (36:31 to 23:29 TOP advantage).

In my next post, I'll take a look at the Divisional Round victory by the Steelers over the Chargers in last year's playoffs, as well as how the Chargers defense looks this year and how I believe we matchup fairly well against them. If you aren't convinced that the offense played well in the two teams' first meeting last year, surely you'll agree that the offense finally put a complete game together when they needed it most.

Comment 32 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Can we get a fullback, please?

The guy on the Dolphins is the real deal, Lousaka Polite. He can block, and carry the ball in short yardage. Since Mendenhall has decided to retire at a young age, Parker needs some help. Bring back Gary Russell for short yardage, try anything, anyone! This team must run to win.

by OrioleSteelerz on Sep 30, 2009 7:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Davis is back for fullbacking

Im not a big davis fan, but he DID do well in the Chargers Playoff last year and FWP went wild. I remember, because I was there!

by Mechem on Sep 30, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm seeing an offensive explosion

We ran all over Whales Vagina in the last two games we’ve played. Ben’s also looked fabulous.

This may very well be a shootout folks.

by Mechem on Sep 30, 2009 7:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree

The main difference between us and the Chargers, offensively, is that they have ZERO running game. I think they’re averaging 2.8 UPC with a perpetually injured LT and that half-pint Sproles.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever.
Napoleon Bonaparte

Stampede Blue's Resident Steelers Fan

by LV Steelers Fan on Sep 30, 2009 10:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not that that ever matters

We usually stuff the run anyway.

But it will certainly help our DB’s to know they are going airborne most all of the time.

by Mechem on Sep 30, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

The chargers will still try to run unless we completely stop them.

You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"

by steelguy99 on Oct 1, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think one of the encouraging things thus far

is the performance of the offense. Ben has gotten decent protection, the running game is improving. When you factor in the dropped passes (Sweed and Holmes), lack of field awareness (Wallace), untimely penalties (Ward), miscommunication and injuries its just enough to be not enough. I’m more concerned about the defense quite frankly, and not that much

by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Sep 30, 2009 8:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

The d will be fine. The offense has looked good, but needs to be much more agessive going for the enzone. Truth is though we’ve left tons of points on the board. Each one of our 4 wide recievers had been in or very near the endzone with two hands on the ball and somehow managed to turn gold into garbage. I can’t see that pattern continuing.

by SteelerBuddha on Sep 30, 2009 10:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yeppers

Once the D gets Troy Polamalu back, by then the offense will be in gear.

This is really the first time our offense has had to carry the team and now they are going to do it. They’re capable of putting up lots of points. I think we’re gonna see Ben sneaking it on 4th and goal from the one forever now, as its working and its almost a sure thing. He’s our new goal line back.

By the time Troy comes back, the O will be in tip top shape, the D will be ready to have him back, and we’ll have a better team than last year.

And i wouldnt be shocked if we went 14-2.

by Mechem on Sep 30, 2009 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

dont think 14-2 is in the cards

But the team could really get going on a nice run here and string together five or six wins. This weekend will be important though. I don’t think they’d be done at 1-3, but it’d be a sticky situation. Schedule opens up quite a bit over next month after this one.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Sep 30, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

1-3 all too soon

You know When you play a team three times in that short of a span they get to know you so well you can’t sweep them. wink

by steelerstyle on Oct 1, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

This from the guy who said there was no way we could lose 5 games this year…

Winning games in the NFL is hard. Sometimes teams just lose. We’re going to have to beat Baltimore twice to 14-2 and I see no reason to think that we’re very much better than them.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Oct 1, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree but I personally think we are really putting it together offensively and this game and the next two should only further that.

Plus when Troy P gets back in the house we’re gonna be back on top defensively.

Baltimore is beatable. We know. We did it. Three times. I’m not as worried.

by Mechem on Oct 1, 2009 7:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we win the next 13 games, I’ll pay for a year of college for you.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Oct 2, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

bolts fan comments

with much respect for Steelers Nation. Big family contigient from Pitt., but I’m SD.

Our big threat is obviously through the air. No running game, no run D. Stop the big plays, you stop SD.

Vincent Jackson is our big threat. Get used to hearing that name.

GL Sunday night!

by Hoot1969 on Sep 30, 2009 11:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks for chiming in.

I haven’t been watching SD enough to know Jackson. His stats suggest to me that he’s a mid/long range threat. Is that right? Or is he better with YAC. It only takes one long catch to upset a scoreboard, but that’s not the sort of game we have trouble defending.

I’d think a better plan for your boys would be tossing to Sproles in the flat and letting him juke our linebackers. We’re susceptible to screens, delayed hand-offs, dink/dunks to TEs, and the occasional slant.

by Varmint on Oct 1, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

So a one-point victory is your example??

I’d actually like to see a game or two where the Steelers dominate both on the field AND on the scoreboard. The longer you allow your opponent to hang in there, the closer you come to losing.

by Billy52 on Sep 30, 2009 11:52 PM EDT reply actions  

He did say he was getting to the divisional game, which was domination.

You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"

by steelguy99 on Oct 1, 2009 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Blitz is looking at the full body of work. His conclusions are based on both games even if he’s analyzing one game at a time.

In the next installment, we run 24 plays to 1 in the third quarter. We had 22 first downs to their 15. We put up 342 net yards in the game and Ben only had to throw 26 times. The SD offense was credible last year, but their defense had trouble with us.

by Varmint on Oct 1, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

17-10

Should have been the actual score of this game. The phantom “forward lateral” on the Polamalu fumble still blows my mind.

I agree with you though Blitz, this game was definitely refreshing after our offense seemed to be sputtering last year. It was aggravating that we did not cross the threshold for 6, but it was good to see the offense flowing. Also, I believe this game gave a boost in confidence for Ben who seemed to be lacking in it at that point. Ultimately, it gave us the push to seal off the division and go into the playoffs with a bye.

I forgot how impressive FWP’s numbers were this game. It will be unfortunate if we don’t see him much this weekend.

" I’m glad we play Pitt twice, and not Tenn this year." - Salty Browns Fan.

by John Stephens on Oct 1, 2009 8:54 AM EDT reply actions  

R. Harris just cut by Panthers, will he be back in Pittsburgh?

Guys, the Carolina Panthers just released R. Harris this morning to sign veteran DT Hollis Thomas. Harris only had 2 tackles the other night and was pushed around pretty good along with his linemates against the Cowboys, but I hope he lands back in Pittsburgh, whether its the regular roster or the practice squad.

I think the guy will be a keeper with some seasoning. He looks like he is a better 3-4 end to me than he did playing a 4-3 DT in Carolina’s D. Anyone else here hopes R. Harris ends up back where he belongs?

I hope some crappy team like Kansas City or the Browns don’t pick him up first off of the waiver wire.

by datruth4life on Oct 1, 2009 11:39 AM EDT reply actions  

This was the "Vegas game"

Steelers favored by 5 points.

I have never seen a more obvious game of tampering by the referees. Everytime the Steelers were going to cover the spread, the refs would blow the whistle and take points off the board.

The Nate Washington long bomb that was whiped off by a holding call.

The Willie Parker touchdown to win the game, once again, whiped off by another questionable holding call.

And to top it off, Polomalu gets a touchdown that there is no possible way that it can be whiped off by the refs and…… whiped off…..

by Freddyd on Oct 1, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah there was some funky boo boo junk going on there…..

by Mechem on Oct 1, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

We could always draft Tim Tebow as a fullback

Then instead of running on 3rd and 1 we can just throw a jump pass or run the wildcat. Of course we would have to hire Urban Meyer as the offensive coordinator. Then we could do what everybody wants to do anyway and trade Ben because he’s washed up.

by StoneColdSteel on Oct 1, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions  

QB Dive

That’s Tebow’s only best play.

by Desroko on Oct 1, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please No FWP

We need to run the ball…alot. We can do this against a Jamal Williams-less Bolts D. Here’s how we should do it. A) No FWP. No matter what he says his Turf Toe is bad. His style is predicated on speed & cutting & he just can’t do that w/ the toe.
B) Force Feed Mendy. Just give him the ball over & over until he can’t run anymore. Give him some carries & rhythm & see what he can do.
C) Use Mewelde Moore as usual on 3rd down. He’s amazing.
This use of the run game will keep our D off the field & will open up more opportunities for Hines, Tone (who will play better) & Wallace.

by TheCornDog on Oct 1, 2009 3:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Ah-ha!

You’re the one who stole Marty McFly’s sports almanac!

by Varmint on Oct 1, 2009 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Right cause you are in FWP’s head and know his foot…

I dont think its that bad. He seemed fine all game.

Mendy force feed is not a terrible idea but the kid needs to be worked into the game, not become it.

Agreed on Memo as usual.

by Mechem on Oct 1, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

No FWP. No matter what he says his Turf Toe is bad.

I don’t think the coaching staff is going by what FWP says. If the doctors and his play on the field lead them to believe he is okay, FWP can and should play. If not, he shouldn’t.

You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"

by steelguy99 on Oct 1, 2009 3:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo