i was reading online that the primary complaint from owners with the present CBA is that 69.6% of every dollar made by the teams is to go to the players salaries. if thats true, then how is it possible that some teams go through the season $20-30 M under the cap while others hover right around the limit? with shared revenue, shouldn't all the teams be around the same salary cap number? teams are left with 40.4% for operating costs and profits. how do certain teams get away with being that far under the cap? can anyone help me understand?