Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Here's To Hoping The Steelers Don't Draft A Cornerback Early On In 2010 Draft

Last week, we posted a roundup of what some of the early mock drafts have the Pittsburgh Steelers doing with the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft.  Yes, there was some variability in what the 'draft gurus' believed the Steelers would and should do with their 1st Round pick this year. For instance, one site had the Steelers taking Clemson running back C.J. Spiller. Most though believed Pittsburgh would bolster their defense in round one, and amongst those who did, most identified the secondary as the area Pittsburgh would likely target. More specifically, the Steelers ought to draft a cornerback in the 1st Round if you go by the early consensus of draft niks. 

I totally disagree. Here's several reasons why.

1) Last time I checked, the Steelers drafted two cornerbacks last year - Keenan Lewis and Joe Burnett. Granted, Lewis was a 3rd rounder and Burnett a 5th, but Lewis in particular has the physical tools to one day be a starter in this league. He just needs some time to learn the game at this level, much like the Steelers incumbent #1 CB Ike Taylor did earlier in his career. By drafting a cornerback in 2010 to play immediately, the Steelers would essentially be giving up on one of those two picks. How so? Well, Taylor's not going anywhere anytime soon. He'll turn 30 in May, but regardless of your opinion of him as an instinctive natural at the position, it's impossible to deny that Taylor is one of the most freakishly fit and durable specimens on the roster. So if it were Taylor and a 2010 1st rounder locking down the CB positions for the foreseeable future, that makes it difficult to work in Lewis and Burnett...not too mention....

2) William Gay. There was no tougher critic of William Gay than me all year. I definitely was disappointed to be 'right' about this one, but I worried 'on the record' here during last year's offseason that I thought the defense would suffer fairly dramatically by inserting him in to the slot once manned by Bryant McFadden. Nevertheless, Gay's struggles this year will pay dividends for the team next year. I'm positive he'll work harder than he has before in his life this offseason to improve his body and game for next year. Even though 'we're the Steelers' and have enjoyed frequent success for quite some time now, it's impossible to stay at the top year in and year out in this league due to the salary cap, and the demands it places on teams to continually work in less expensive, young talent. That means some down years from time to time, even for the best franchises. It would be foolish, I believe, to give up on Gay and not reap some dividends in future years for the losses the team incurred while working him in to the fold in 2010. 

3) It's impossible to really say just how much of a difference Troy Polamalu makes when he's out there and healthy. On the one hand, it's easy to argue that there are 11 guys out there and that no single player can or should be that much of a difference maker. On the other hand, the proof may just be in the pudding. When #43 plays, the Steelers win and make life awfully tough on opposing offenses. With Polamalu doing his thing, our cornerbacks have looked significantly better in years past than they have when he's shelved with an injury. 

***********

Now, it might be argued that the Steelers should consider finding another top shelf safety to play alongside Polamalu given his propensity for getting injured. I'd be amenable to that for sure, though I haven't yet scoured the draft boards closely enough to know who might be a good fit.

Getting a cornerback this year though in the 1st Round doesn't make sense to me. I'd instead look for a homerun pick at ILB or at nose tackle. James Farrior's replacement needs to be secured sooner rather than later. So does Casey Hampton's. I don't see that same immediate need at the cornerback position, particularly when you consider the fact that Pittsburgh plays in the AFC North where a high premium is placed on winning the battle at the line of scrimmage and fielding a physical team in the trenches. We know Baltimore's offensive line and running game is in good shape for the future; same with Cincinnati, and to a lesser degree, even Cleveland. 

So, I'd like to hear your thoughts and I'm sure I'll be expounding on some of these thoughts in the future weeks and months, but for now, this is my story and I'm sticking to it - let's see what the Steelers can do next year defensively if Polamalu's back healthy and our young DBs have had that much more time to develop. If we see the same problems rear their ugly head next year - namely, if #43 can't stay healthy again, and if guys like Gay, Lewis and Burnett struggle - then maybe it'd be time to invest heavily in getting a lockdown corner early on in the Draft. For now though, I believe Pittsburgh would be better served packaging a number of their mid round picks to move up in Round 1 and get a slam dunk pick like Rolando McClain, Gerald McCoy or even one of the prized offensive tackles of this year's Draft. 

Comment 311 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Completely Agree

There’s no way we should draft a Corner in the first round. The only corner REMOTELY close of a 1st round pick is Joe Hayden, and there’s no way we get him. As for defensive tackle, the Steelers have a trend of not picking the same position in the first round two years in a row (In fact, if I remember correctly, they’ve NEVER done that) Therefore, since Ziggy Hood is a DL, i doubt they’d take another one. Furthermore, the Steelers usually draft with the future in mine, so I think that either an ILB or an offensive lineman are the best bets. I wouldn’t mind seeing a good guard, especially since both darnell stapleton and trai essex aren’t exactly amazing. Or even a tackle, so that way we can move Colon inside to Guard, where he truly belongs. CJ Spiller seems like a bit of a waste pick, as we can probably pick up someone like Jahvid Best or Steven McCluster in the later rounds.
As for DB help, the player I’ve fallen in love with during this draft process is Myron Rolle out of FSU. You know, the Free Safety (hmm, the safety position that Polamalu DOESN’T play) that slacked off this year by not playing football and instead studied at Oxford on a Rhodes Scholarship. LeBeau would love to have a leader like him, as Rolle would definately b e able to soak up any info he received from the likes of LeBeau and Polamalu.
That said, I’m rooting for Rolando McClain (though I doubt he drops to us at 18) or Bulaga out of Iowa.

by BlackandGold on Jan 26, 2010 1:14 AM EST reply actions  

Colon is not moving to guard. Despite what every Steelers message board has been saying since he was drafted, he’s not moving. Let’s not talk about that.

I agree the McClain would be a great pick.

by Cols714 on Jan 26, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorry to ask a stupid question

but why would that be?

Colon is not moving to guard.

by Twell on Jan 26, 2010 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Other than

The Steelers have never tried to move him. The best reason I have read, was in a post by Mary Rose last year. He interviewed Craig Wolfley and asked that question. Wolfley basically said Colon doesn’t have the tools/skills to play guard, and that is coming from a former Steeler OL man that watches every game.

Sorry, I can’t find the post.

by SteelBuckeye on Jan 26, 2010 6:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks

I had read somewhere in articles (I have to go find it now) that Colon would be better off at guard, so I was hoping to find out a little more about why Col714 was so adamant that it wasn’t even in the cards with a new OL coach. Just trying to expand my line knowledge.

by Twell on Jan 26, 2010 6:32 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s the fact that people on Steelers boards have been talking about this moving Colon to guard stuff since he was drafted. This is despite the fact that the team has never once talked about moving him to guard.

So he’s not moving and we should stop pretending he is.

by Cols714 on Jan 26, 2010 8:16 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

+1

we need to stop it unless there’s some reason from the team to think this is the case.

by Steely McSmash on Jan 26, 2010 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Found it

this is what I was thinking when I asked…from Lance Zierlein after they fired dad

If the Steelers had a quicker-footed tackle, it would help with their running game and it would allow the Steelers to bump Willie Colon inside to RG. I know my dad disagrees with me on that and he likes Willie just fine at tackle, but Colon is a beast when it comes to pushing people off the ball in the running game and I think he could develop into an All-Pro guard who would also help the Steelers see more success in their short yardage rushing game. Colon is much better than Steeler fans think he is. Opposing defensive coordinators know that he’s made huge improvements in his pass protection and he is no fun to go up against in the running game.

Although it seems not everyone would agree with this assessment.

Thanks for humoring me.

by Twell on Jan 27, 2010 6:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Here’s the thing though. No one on the Steelers, including the guy who was coaching the OL have ever talked about moving him to guard. No one at all. Sure some guys on sports blogs have said that, but no one who actually makes decisions has ever said they were moving Colon to guard. It’s just a message board fantasy that’s been going on for 4 years.

by Cols714 on Jan 28, 2010 9:56 AM EST up reply actions  

In fact

they Steelers FO guys have said that there is no plan whatsoever to either replace Colon at RT or to move him inside.

by tobiathan on Jan 28, 2010 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, go read the Post-Gazette today. Colon’s agent and the Steelers seem to agree that he’s one of the best RTs in football. I don’t really agree with that, I think he’s above average but takes way too many penalties, but there is no talk of moving him to guard.

by Cols714 on Jan 28, 2010 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I read that

Seems as if that’s his agent trying to negotiate through the press, not that that is unusual. That standard “Steelers always start talking to guys before their contract year” thing, and that because they haven’t initiated talks, that it is saying something about how much the Steelers value him, etc etc. I haven’t paid that close attention previously to that, so I wonder if that is really standard, at least anymore.

just a message board fantasy

Yeah, I get it, kind of discussion forum ‘self-pleasure’

Thanks, Cols714

by Twell on Jan 28, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Just to let you know, I wasn’t trying to pick on you. This has been a pet peeve of mine for about a year. Every time Colon is mentioned you get someone saying he’d be a better guard and the Steelers are going to draft an OT and move him.

Who knows, maybe they will and maybe he is a better guard. But since no one connected with the team has ever even insinuated this, well I have my doubts.

And yeah, I think Colon will probably get a one year deal for this year and then he’s gone. Otherwise it is odd that they haven’t talked to him long term.

by Cols714 on Jan 28, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

We're cool

I appreciate the frustration. It was a little annoying to read the thread where one person kept going on about BPA, and how it trumped need in the draft etc etc etc.

Luckily Maryrose stepped in with a post of clarity.

So I get why you feel “Why are we still taking about this?” As I try to sharpen my knowledge in here, I like to ask questions. Thanks for your input.

by Twell on Jan 28, 2010 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

twell

You are one swell guy/gal my friend. Glad to have you round these parts, for sure. Cheers.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Jan 29, 2010 2:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, thanks

..I think. Hard to say how you use the word “swell”

Actually, I like using the word, but usually use when I am giving someone a hard time, in good fun of course.

No matter, I like what gets shared in here, and appreciate the amount of knowledge, obsessed analysis, and everyone’s got a perspective…even if some of them are a little beer affected, god knows some of mine are.

Keep it rolling Blitz!

by Twell on Jan 29, 2010 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

He doesn’t have the tools to play tackle either!

by madjack on Jan 27, 2010 1:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Also agree!

I keep reading on other blogs about us taking a CB & can’t believe my eyes! We waited on Deshea, Ike, & McFadden, just got Gay 2 yrs. ago, & took Lewis & Burnett last year! Folks talk too much from the heart, not the brain.

As for no D-line 2yrs. running, I hope that trend can be snapped. Everyone seems to think Troy going down was the collapse of the D. I beg to differ. WHENEVER A.Smith is hurt, we suffer against the run, & it eventually takes it’s toll in the back end, or secondary! Spiller in the 1st rd.? WHAAAAAAAAT? Sign FWP, he knows the offense, & no-one is going to pay him top $ anyway, so he won’t break the bank.

My dream: Dan Williams at 18; Chad Jones at 50; Eric Norwood at 82; Kyle Callaway at 100; Micah Johnson at 132; (Comp. pick) Jimmie Graham at 147; Vince Oghabaase at 179; (Comp. pick) Reggie Carter at 194; Berrie Church at 226.

Depth for ST’s, and some FA invites. Really wouldn’t mind taking a flier in 5-7th for LeGarrette Blount. One punch, no other history? Give ‘em a chance! Ever notice how RB’s make good tackles on ST’s? :) , make him EARN a spot. JMO

"You never stand so tall as to when you reach down to pick someone up."

by Chise67 on Jan 26, 2010 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I think one of the things people forget

is that Lewis missed alot of last year after being placed on IR. I was a really big fan of the pick at the time and I think he is going to be a very good DB in this league. I also think that Burnett (fairly or not) gets a terrible stigma about his entire game because he dropped that pick in Oakland. Awful moment? Absolutely, I almost cried. Does it mean he can’t play in the NFL? Uh, no.

The glare of the spotlight is harsh, and the pressure that success breeds immense. We revere our heroes, but expect much. And criticism can come as easily as praise.

by glass0941 on Jan 27, 2010 2:00 AM EST up reply actions  

"Me thinks he be genius!!!!!"

Great post! I, as an Ohio St. die-hard(Alma mater), believe us Steeler fans suffer from the same syndrome Buckeye fans do. It’s called being spoiled! :) If we lose more than 2 games, the world isn’t round anymore! God forbid we don’t make the playoffs! :) Of course being a generation that can barely wait for microwave popcorn contributes greatly! LOL: Lewis will be an Ike clone, just not as freakishly fast; Burnett will be more Deshea w/ better ball skills.

I see picking 18 as a great thing! ALWAYS picking 27-32 cramps the style after awhile. :)

"You never stand so tall as to when you reach down to pick someone up."

by Chise67 on Jan 27, 2010 9:59 AM EST up reply actions  

good stuff

nice thoughts

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Jan 27, 2010 3:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I hate to be a nitpick

But the guy is Dexter McCluster. That being said, he is an absolute monster. When people were talking about Jevan Sneed all year in the SEC, it was McCluster who was dominating games against some of the fastest defenses in the nation. He almost beat us in Columbia by himself this season. I would LOVE to see him in a Steeler uniform to match up with Mendenhall. Like I said, sorry to be so picky, but the man should have his name out there.

That being said, I’m a huge Taylor Mays fan, I think a secondary with him and Troy would be downright devistating, but I think he goes to Oakland (poor guy, that’s the end of what could’ve been a great career) as I hear Al Davis is enamored with his athleticism (shocking right?).

I love the McClain pick, I might enjoy see Terrance Cody if he’s still around (different mocks have him in different places) even if he can only play 2 downs. Someone else I think is flying under the radar is Brandon Spikes. As a Gamecock, I think he’s a dirty rotten eye-gouger (ok, well the last part is at least true), but I also think he’d be an excellent inside linebacker for the Steelers. My own personal bias aside, the man wraps up tackles and plays very physically.

As for offensive line, I’m not thrilled with the depth of this year’s draft at that position, but then again, anything can happen in the draft. I am so excited, this is my favorite time of year!

The glare of the spotlight is harsh, and the pressure that success breeds immense. We revere our heroes, but expect much. And criticism can come as easily as praise.

by glass0941 on Jan 27, 2010 1:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Steelers drafted Troy Edwards and Plaxico Burress back to back in ’99 and ’00. I do not see them going DT in first or second round this year though.

by Stillerz Damo on Jan 27, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

sorry to nitpick

but a quick check of our draft results shows they drafted a WR in the first round in 99 and in 00 (Troy Edwards, Plex respectively)

by steelerark on Jan 27, 2010 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Myron Rolle ftw

I definitely agree with bringing Myron Rolle in with a much later pick.

by xaryss on Jan 28, 2010 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

I know essentially nothing about the draft at this point

but I’m with you on Rolle. Anybody that is smart enough to get a Rhodes fellowship and far-sighted enough to take it has my vote…

"You learn more in failure than you do in success." - Mike Tomlin

by Rebecca Rollett on Jan 28, 2010 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree

If Hampton leaves, first rounder HAS to be a NT. There’s no way to run a 3-4 D without a monster in the middle. Hoke can survive, but there’s a need for the future. Some people on here have suggested Sonny Harris, but I haven’t seen him in the middle and from his stats he seems a little small.
If McClain falls to 18, I’d be sprinting to the podium to hand in that pick. The guy is a can’t miss prospect (yes, I know we say that about people every year, and every year that person struggles) but I can’t see it with McClain. He looks as instinctive and sure as any college linebacker I’ve seen in a long long time.
I don’t want to see us draft a running back until the 4th-5th at the earliest. Mendenhall showed he could pick up the yards on 3rd and short when he got the (rare) opportunities, so why not give him more opportunities. He seems like a guy who can move the pack.
I don’t think the first round choice should be a DB, mostly because other than Eric Berry and Joe Haden, there’s only Earl Thomas, and I think Morgan Burnett is just as good, if not better. If Eric Berry somehow slipped, I’d kill to put him in the backfield next to Troy.
To me, the first round choice, if Hampton stays, and assuming McClain and Berry don’t drop unexpectedly, should be a solid OL. Watching Bulaga hammer Derrick Morgan all day in the Orange Bowl made me think he could be the missing tackle, either RT to move Colon inside, or LT if we shift Starks back to the right.

by mojo88 on Jan 26, 2010 1:28 AM EST reply actions  

Earl Thomas

Eh, I’m afraid that Earl Thomas gets lost in a game for too long. From the two or three games this year I watched him he seems to disappear for plays on end. I think he stands out simply because of the average level of players around him. Not that he’s terrible or anything, but I don’t see him as a star.

McClain would be an absolute steal if he makes it to the Steelers. Berry too. I almost hate you all for even suggesting that the Steelers have a shot at either one.

by 13thieves on Jan 26, 2010 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Harris a little small?

He’s 6’5", and ~300 lbs. He just needs to go on a Rex Ryan diet, and he’ll be fine.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 1:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Draft Day Best Athlete Available

It is not likely to draft a McClain. I also don’t think we should give up any picks either. However, I do think the safety position is one that we might address. I think as along as we re-sign Casey Hampton we should look at the Safety position. Eric Berry would be a dream pick but I do not think he is going to be available. It is more realistic that Earl Thomas would be their. If however neither is available then the ILB should be address with Brandon Spikes. R. McClain will be long gone by then. The thing to look at is who are we going to re-sign. If Casey is looking for Redskin money then we need to draft a NT. I like Casey but I just do not think he is worth 100 mill. The 1st draft pick should go to the best athlete available. Like Colbert said its way to early to look at who we should draft. I did look at the needs of most of the teams in front of us and it is possible for MC Clain to slip. Eric Berry is going to get picked up by the 49ers. That’s why I say Earl Thomas or Bradon Spikes seem to be the realistic picks. T. Mays might even be available but I do know if we want to grab him. The Running back Spiller may also be still available but will we keep Parker. If we lose Parker then Spiller has value. It is very likely that Ryan Clark might stay since he doesn’t hold to much value on his self then we will make a good deal keeping him. That’s why we must pick the best athlete available.

by greenm on Jan 26, 2010 1:51 AM EST reply actions  

Parker wants a shot at starting....

…..so he won’t stay if there’s that opportunity. I think he’ll get it, so I’ll wish him the best.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Jan 26, 2010 2:08 AM EST up reply actions  

FS - Earl Thomas

I’m a huge fan of picking up this kid. Here is his breakdown from over at MtD here on SB Nation.

A ball hawk coverage FS with speed who may not be big enough to take on runningbacks, but is willing and shows some promise there? Put him back with Troy, put Clark as back up to both and you suddenly have as awesome group of safeties. I agree we don’t need a CB, but if Haden dropped (HA!) that wouldn’t be a bad grab either.

If D. Williams is available we should grab him, he’ll be a great NT. Just as long as we don’t grab Cody, he looks worse than snack now. He’s a serious risk to be horrible, but his upside is good enough someone will take him and hope he straightens out.

by Phantaskippy on Jan 26, 2010 1:58 AM EST reply actions  

Earl Thomas looks phenomenal in coverage. The only issue I have with him is he is going to be a first round draft pick. I believe Burnett is just as good, and will only cost us a second. That first round pick can then be used on either OL, NT or ILB

by mojo88 on Jan 26, 2010 2:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I would be thrilled if we got a shot at Thomas. He may be the best DB that we’ll have a realistic shot at.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Welcome back, BadMaafala.

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on Jan 26, 2010 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey, thanks. I’m just now beginning to accept that BA will still be our OC. A lot of denial and anger in the intermediate stages.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Yessir, that´s a common "disease in this side of the river".

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on Jan 26, 2010 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I could have used your help on my “Why to Replace BA post” ;)

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jan 26, 2010 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

You didn’t need any help. You did a fantastic job.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jan 27, 2010 9:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks :)

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jan 27, 2010 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Dan Williams is....

..certainly deserving of being considered the best NT proposition in the draft but whether he is that much better than Cam Thomas or even Troup, both of whom should be available in the third round is debatable.

 Also, another option to consider is the unfortunate DeMarcus Granger, who had a non-injury related back surgery(birth defect) and has seen his stock fall even though he has returned to the field late in the collegiate season. I think he would have probably been a top ten pick otherwise as I believe he has superior skills when compared to Williams but any evaluation must be tempered with whatever medical outlook is provided by the team doctors.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Jan 26, 2010 2:36 AM EST reply actions  

No idea who DeMarcus Granger is...

…but it sounds entirely plausible that he could already be flagged on their radar as a potential “steal” given their recent history of taking guys that “fell” due to injuries (Sweed, Hills, and Dixon all in 2008). But by the same token, the somewhat underwhelming development of Sweed and Hills could turn them off of a guy like Granger so who knows.

by barnerburner on Jan 26, 2010 3:55 AM EST up reply actions  

shoplifting arrest is the main thing that scared people off I think...

"Every Day I walk past 6 Lombardi trophies not 6 rushing titles" - Greatest Tomlinism ever.

by Josh Roberts (ESGB) on Jan 26, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

He got passed up on the depth chart at Oklahoma

He might be an under the radar type guy, but I wonder how much better he can get and about his work ethic. How do you go from full time starter to hardly ever playing as a senior?

by StoneColdSteel on Jan 26, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Ask Vontae Davis

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:11 PM EST up reply actions  

He had back surgery....

…to correct a birth defect, did not return to game action until November.

And it’s shoplifting, not drug possession or armed robbery like those twits at Tennessee, I’m not advocating ignoring it but don’t overstate it either, unless it’s part of a larger problem it shouldn’t be a deterrent, it’s shoplifting.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Jan 26, 2010 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

It's a sign of bad character/work ethic

as is being the number one DT in your recruiting class and never really producing, (that class has Brian Price, Suh, McCoy)

"Every Day I walk past 6 Lombardi trophies not 6 rushing titles" - Greatest Tomlinism ever.

by Josh Roberts (ESGB) on Jan 26, 2010 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Jared Odrick, DT from Penn State

Got considerable raves on the NFL Network for his Senior Bowl practice. They even compared him to Aaron Smith as a run stuffer. Thinking long term, this sure would shore up your bookends on the D line for many years to come.

by SteelerMessican on Jan 26, 2010 7:56 AM EST reply actions  

CB

keenan lewis is a bust. can’t get on the field

by royhobbs9 on Jan 26, 2010 8:09 AM EST reply actions  

Troy didn't get on the field

Woodly didn’t get on the field, Timmons didn’t get on the field. are they busts?

I getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.

by Steel in FL on Jan 26, 2010 9:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Troy and Woodley both saw the field a lot their rookie years and made real contributions, even if there were mistakes along with them.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

And Timmons

may have been their leading tackler on ST.
I was disappointed that K Lewis didn’t dress all year. I hope he has worked on his game because we could use a big fast young corner at Latrobe and beyond.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jan 26, 2010 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

K Lewis 3rd round pic

Troy, Timmons & Woodly were 1st and 2nd round draft choices. Anything after the 3rd you hope can get on the field but you expect them to be a project or need some work. I’m hopeful he will go down to Florida with Ike and Gay to train and work on his game. But to compare him to those guys is unfair. They more than likely were forced on the field because of their draft position. Plus, we have vets like Ike, Gay, Townsand and Madison. Now that he has a year under his belt let’s see if he can make the sophmore jump Tomlin expects from his sophmore players. Not against taking a CB but not care to use a high draft pick on one unless once again he’s a must have. NT and S there’s no promising replacements right now. I would rather use high picks there.

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

In general

rookies do not get put into vital roles their first year for the Steelers. The guys that did play, were there to cover injuries, or excelled in package/ST play. Bust is a strong word for someone we haven’t seen too much of. Burnett didn’t get much time either, is he a bust too? If you want to show concern for the secondary, I would think these are the last guys you can blame for last year’s problems…they weren’t on the field.

"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.

by kick him in the head on Jan 26, 2010 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Concur

Our young DB’s (given they have thick skin and can mentally recover from this season) have the physical skills to do well in this league and hopfully in our defensive scheme. Even Gay can turn around and Keenan Lewis is not a bust “royhobbs9” Too early to tell…
Mr Farrior, thank you for your top notch play and leadership, but he is now a step behind and perhaps a new ILB with a 2-3rd pick. I like the duo of Timmons/K. Fox though.
1st round pick should address either NT or OL depending on what they do with Casey Hampton. There appears to be some promising linemen in this draft and Blitz’s take to not draft a DB has merit. Would love to get a Rt Guard with a Joe Thomas disposition or a Center. I miss the days of Webster to Dawson to Hartings……we got spoiled over the yrs with having excellent centers that we just thought one would pop in and take over…not that easy.

by ToonaSteel on Jan 26, 2010 8:16 AM EST reply actions  

I think...

that I would have to agree with those who say that the Offensive Line should be the priority in the early rounds of the draft. Games are usually won and lost on the line of scrimmage.
As to the D-line aspect of that,maybe going the Non-Exclusive Franchise Tag role with Hampton is the way to go for a year,and look to the 2011 draft for his ultimate replacement.

by havildar on Jan 26, 2010 8:22 AM EST reply actions  

Draft a QB

I want a QB controversy….I miss those (remember Lefty over Ben? lol)

Seriously though, I’m on board with big_jay. If we don’t resign Hampton we have to go NT to anchor our 3-4. Possibly even trade up to make sure we get the guy we think will fit our system best.

If Hampton does resign, I’d like us to trade up and grab McClain. Then we can grab a S or CB in later rounds because this draft is deep with them.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 9:08 AM EST reply actions  

See any good indications Steelers go to a 4-3

Or will the draft tell us that, you think? Does the drafting of Ziggy indicate that at all to you?

by Twell on Jan 26, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Not as long as Coach Dad is the DC.

I fully expect them to go to 4-3 when Dick leaves, because that’s what Tomlin knows, but not before

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks fever

That was my hunch, but wanted some other’s insight. Read that Ziggy is better suited for 4-3, lots of other teams are switching/have switched to 3-4 meaning more demand for NTs. I know Snack is first in line for a new deal, but if he wants more pay than the Steelers are wiling to shell out and is really only a two down NT, maybe this draft will show more investment for the impending switch.

Like you said, the writing is on the wall for after DL, but I wonder how he feels about getting to work with guys who aren’t suited to a 3-4 as much as the 4-3.

by Twell on Jan 26, 2010 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

to answer the question directly...

There have been no INDICATIONS. A lot of guessing.

Keep in mind that although Tomlin knows 4-3 from his past experience. And now he know the 3-4 from working with Lebeau. If you take any stock in the rumor that Keith Butler will be the next DC, then I’d think 3-4 is the way to go. Honestly with the league being more pass-heavy, the dominance of the 3-4 seems like a natural development.

by Steely McSmash on Jan 26, 2010 9:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the draft and the Hampton situation tells us

If we don’t draft a guy and Hampton doesn’t get resigned it would appear we are switching, which I think is a terrible idea and will really turn me off toward Tomlin. Hopefully, something happens to keep us in a 3-4.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 27, 2010 8:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks Johnny

Its along wait and see, although time flies and it will be april in no time…ah the pardoxes of life.

by Twell on Jan 30, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Struggles at CB

I don’t think we need a CB – as in “let’s draft the best CB that we can in the first round”. However, if we got a good value there in the first, I wouldn’t hesitate at all to pull the trigger.

We don’t have an impact CB. Taylor is a very useful player and was a big part of our success in 2008, but we know his limitations. Gay can be a very solid corner in a cover-2 or nickel, but when your safeties don’t have the range to split the deep zones, he’s not going to make anything better.

As for Lewis and Burnett, neither fits the profile of Taylor, with the exception of hands. Taylor is as fast as Chris Johnson, while Lewis and Burnett are about average speed for DB’s. I’d really like to see Lewis get a shot at safety, where he could be an asset, but he may not have been ready for that last year.

The possible solutions are:
1. Don’t let Troy pose for Madden or block FG’s
2. Draft an impact safety who can make our defense better and deeper and let our mediocre CB’s jump routes in short zones
3. Draft a CB who can catch the damn ball and doesn’t always need a ton of help behind him or 15 yard cushions.

Either 2 or 3 would make our defense a lot better and a lot deeper in the secondary. If we don’t get a chance at a great DB in the first, I’d like to see us either draft a safety in the next few rounds or take a flier on a less experienced but freakishly fast CB like Taylor in the later rounds. I don’t want to see us grab another slower zone CB in rounds 3-5, because we already have 3 of those and they can’t play cover-3 worth a damn.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 9:27 AM EST reply actions  

3. Draft a CB who can catch the damn ball and doesn’t always need a ton of help behind him or 15 yard cushions.

This!

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Something I’ve been thinking about is that CB’s are more highly valued on the market than safeties, so if we paired Troy with another top notch safety, it wouldn’t make us so dependent on Troy’s health, but it would allow us to get by with just decent CB’s and a lower payroll. The franchise tags are roughly $10M for CB and $6M for S. The argument is that CB’s are more important on more plays, but I think that greatly depends on the player and the scheme. 2009 showed us that Polamalu was worth a lot more than $6M in 2008. Probably more than $10M.

It doesn’t mean I wouldn’t take a great CB if offered, but if all else is the same, safety might be a better investment.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Safety? Did you say Safety?

One of the biggest problems is that Troy is too important to the secondary. I agree. We need another safety who is as athletic as Troy, with a brain to boot.

Further, this season, it felt like everybody on defense was second guessing themselves, didn’t really know the schemes and didn’t have the aestheticism to make up for being ‘lost’ – in other words, a bit slow, and not “swarming” like they used to – and that’s not even addressing the lackluster cornerback play.

In the back of my mind,. I always thought this last season was Dick LeBeau’s final or second to final year, and the strategy was to let other coaches, Tomlin, and other players to learn the system and take it into the future. Didn’t work all that great but I think the Steelers staff knew that. That’s why they kept putting up big offensive numbers from the get go(and maybe to appease Ben and his stats). LeBeau won’t be there forever…..

by IronJake on Jan 26, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Best Defensive Athlete

They need the best defensive athlete they can get. I am not up on the college players like others on the site but if there is a DB available and worthy of the 18th pick I say take him. You can never have too many DBs. Ike is 30. How many years does he have left? If it takes a rookie a couple years to develop like you say then a top notch DB should be ready to step in when Ike loses a step in a couple years.

If the best athlete available is a NT and they do not resign Snack take him. As stated above in a 3/4 you need a monster at NT. If they should sign Snack they still need a developmental NT but can get one later.

An ILB, OT or S would also be welcome in round 1 if they are worthy of the pick. The Steelers have more holes than they have had in several years so while I agree with the standard philosophy of best athlete available, I think this year the philopsophy should be draft the best athlete on defense that is available.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jan 26, 2010 9:29 AM EST reply actions  

2010 draft

       While many of us are already thing about the draft and know some of the Steelers needs. Many of you have given me good food for thought.
it is to early to assign where the steelers will pick what. There are too many unknown variables. 1- Casey Hampton if not signed will probably be franchised. So they could wait till 5th or 6th round to pick a nose tackle’ because there is no clear 1st round talent rated yet.
     2- Last year they clearly would have liked to pick a center in the 1st round, but all 1st round talent was gone when it came their turn to pick and there again so far there are no upper 1st round centers projected yet this year. 2- If L. Sweed isn’t an option this year they may have to draft a WR before the 4th round. 3- If willy doesn’t come back, unless the have their eye on a lower round guy they will need to draft a RB before the 5th round.
     4- I do believe we need an upper round safety to play behind Troy and possibly alternate with him in the future.
       With what little I believe to know so far. My early guess Is the steelers will draft for these positions. Order of picks unknown. SS , OL, possibly a center, RB, WR, NT, LB.
      Of course will all know if someone of high value falls to the they could pick them even if they don’t have a need at that position.
               Happy steeler thoughts to us all.
 

by steeler junky on Jan 26, 2010 9:35 AM EST reply actions  

NT

Hampton said if he was tagged he would hold out. We don’t want that mess considering a tag is a lot of money, especially at NT. Also, very good NT are very hard to come by. I doubt there is one we could grab very late that would be able to anchor our 3-4. The only way we could grab one late is if Hampton was resigned and he was possibly a prospect who needs time to develop.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

In relation to my reply to you above
very good NT are very hard to come by.

Good reasoning to go to a 4-3?

by Twell on Jan 26, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

reason why I think this is so..

might be that the guys that have NT size probably get put at OG or OC in college.

Kind of wonder if the FO would consider converting one of these guys to DL.

by Steely McSmash on Jan 26, 2010 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I may be a little confused, but

The 5 game slide late in the season did not have a thing to do with the talent on the field. The Steelers had one of the most talented rosters, but in todays game, it takes more than talent to win. No backstabbing, no favoritism, no glory seeking. The Steelers have always been my favorite because, come game time, the shoe laces were tightened, the helmets strapped on, and for 60 minutes guys were going to play as hard as they could, and support one another. The draft is the draft, but someone figure out what’s going on inside the current player’s heads first!

by Strahley on Jan 28, 2010 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I Agree

I absolutely do not think that we should draft a CB with our first round pick. I mean we drafted 2 last year and hopefully they progress a lot this off season. I Do think we should go Defense though. As much as I would love to see someone like spiller in our backfield, Mccluster will be available in the mid – late rounds and he could possibly fit in just as well as a first round pick. So i would love to see us draft something for our defense other than a CB. I would love Cody from Bama or Mcclain from Bama. Even Though Mays had a somewhat crappy year, him and troy would be a force in the secondary. Anywho I just want someone other then a Damn CB lol

In Myron we Trust

by SteelTownKid08 on Jan 26, 2010 9:51 AM EST reply actions  

One thing I haven't heard

I am personally completely against trading up in this draft. I say that unless someone drops…say a McClain or a Hayden, there is no reason to not trade down, acquire a few more draft picks, infuse some youth into an aging defense. If we can find a trade partner in the 25-40 spot, get their first, their second, third and fourth for our first and third. With that, the possibilities (let’s say Minnesota, though I know no reason they would want to move up, just for the sake of argument. And for the record that would be our 1080 pt value on our picks for 1074, a workable difference), I can’t see any reason we wouldn’t take that trade in a heartbeat. We’d then have the 30th, 50th, 62nd, 94th, 114th, 126th, etc. While this exact scenario is fairly unlikely, I just threw something together that worked for point values. Then, with the 30th pick we can hope some athletic freak like Taylor Mays or Carlos Dunlap (though I would personally prefer someone without a DUI on the roster…) falls to us or go for value with someone like Odrick or whoever between Cody/Williams falls that far, as that is also a good possibility.
Either way, I have always loved drafting down, getting more young blood, creating competition and discovering diamonds in the rough that will be very cheap for several years. I would expound on who those wonderful second round picks could be (the best round to draft in, IMO (basically cheaper first round talent is almost always available), but I am at work, so those are the only two cents I have time to offer. Either way, I say trade down and stockpile some young talent. Besides, the 30th pick makes a much more manageable cap number to try and keep around a Casey Hampton or Ryan Clark or James Farrior until their successor can be groomed. Even if we take a first round S or CB, by the way, in no way means the issue is solved. Look at Polamalu for all the reasons you need there.

by TheRebelMonk on Jan 26, 2010 10:19 AM EST reply actions  

Reason to not trade down

Looking at the talent distrubtion and our needs, I think it’s likely that a very good player at a position we need will be available at 18. Earl Thomas, McClain, Dan Williams, and a number of OT’s all have a good chance to be good values at 18. Sure if someone offers us their first 4 picks (haha) to move up 10 spots, I’m going to take it, but that’s a pretty unrealistic scenario. If someone offers us a 3rd and 4th rounder to move up 7-10 spots (more realistic), I’d only take it if we don’t like the players available. There’s big drop-offs from all 3 of those defensive players to the next best prospects and someone would have to offer me a lot to make me pass for the next best thing.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Somewhat agreed

on the fact that it is unlikely…as I have mentioned. But I also mentioned only doing it in the case that someone like a McClain isn’t available. I certainly wouldn’t have a problem taking an Earl Thomas. Dan Williams barely rates out as a first round talent, so taking may be a bit of a reach, hence why trading down. I just think teams that trade up hurt themselves more often than not. The salary cap hit is always bigger, and if they are a bust then you have now had a horrendous draft where the 1/ 4 or 5 picks is a bust and a salaried burden plus whichever other players don’t pan out, which will happen. Take that versus 1/6 or 7 where the salary cap hit is definitely less, the chance of a bust is marginally more and the rest is essentially the same, then yes, trading down makes sense to me.
IMO if we resign Hampton and neither Thomas nor McClain are available, getting more draft picks should then be the priority. A lot of this depends upon what could happen. I was just throwing out a few new ideas there, is all.

by TheRebelMonk on Jan 26, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m with you on avoiding the big price tags associated with top 10 picks. Advanced studies have shown that picks in the late first round are actually more valuable than early ones because of player salaries. The players are better, but not enough better that they warrant the huge contracts.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Which is the biggest flaw in what some people are complaining about with competitive balance. Draft in the top 5 a few years in a row and the financial price tag is deadly…my answer to that, though, is trade down (did I mention I like trading down?). Unless they start doing draft slot pricing that won’t change.

by TheRebelMonk on Jan 26, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I agree. I do think the new CBA (when it happens) will address the prices of draft picks. The players don’t like it gives too much money to players who aren’t even in the players’ union yet, and obviously the owners don’t like it. Alex Smith and Jamarcus Russell seem to be in favor of the current system, though.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmm…wonder why they could POSSIBLY love it?

by TheRebelMonk on Jan 26, 2010 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Hell, I'd LOVE to be paid to do nothing...

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's a thought...

Why not draft the best available player, regardless of position?

by hritzm31608 on Jan 26, 2010 10:36 AM EST reply actions  

Because We Don't Need a QB, RB, TE or DE

drafted that high when other needs are more prevalent.

When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen

by 5020 on Jan 26, 2010 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

How do you know your needs?

Can you predict what your injuries will be in the following season? I would think not, and that is why need based picking is inappropriate. Suppose Roethlisberger or Mendenhall tear an ACL in the first game of the season. Suddenly, your needs have changed.

Moreover, do you pass on Chris Johnson because you don’t need a running back? The Titans didn’t. They were ridiculed at the time because they supposedly had more pressing “needs.” The Jaguars passed on Roethlisberger because they didn’t “need” a quarterback. Was that a wise move?

by hritzm31608 on Jan 26, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

The difference with us and Jacksonville is that the Steelers have won 2 SBs with this QB. We do not need a QB, also considering we have a good back up. Not to add this years QBs are bad.

RB, you could have a decent argument here. However, as stated before we can get just as good RB in the 2nd or 3rd if we really need one. Mendy will get the most carries. Picking based on “well what if he is injured” seems kind of foolish to me. You draft based on what you have. The Steelers have a young starting RB, all we need is a back up.

TEs you can get in later rounds. And DEs the Steelers have good depth but always find talent at DE in later rounds.

Taking the best available player only makes sense if you don’t already have a young starter at that position who isn’t prone to injury.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

You made my point

The Jaguars passed on Roethlisberger when they didn’t need a quarterback. Imagine if the Jags had drafted Ben, they might’ve won a couple of Super Bowls. Instead of having a great QB, the Jaguars have David Garrard and no QB for the future.

The point is not picking “well what if he is injured.” The point is taking the best available player because you cannot predict your injuries and you have no idea what your needs will be. That is why need based picking is senseless.

Sure you can get tight ends in later rounds, but if a tight end is the highest rated player on your board in the first round, you take him. That’s what the Steelers did with Heath Miller. How did that pick turn out?

Did the Jets need a DB when they selected Revis. No, they drafted BAP. Would you want to pass on a Revis type player.

Also, if you don’t draft according to BAP, you are handing your competition the better players?

by hritzm31608 on Jan 26, 2010 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I am a big supporter of taking the BPA, but there is definitely a balance. Perhaps “best value available” would be a better way to characterize a good draft strategy.

Drafting a QB in the first would be stupid because there’s a pretty high probability that we would get very little for whoever we drafted. A lesser player with a higher probabilty of contributing would be more valuable and a better pick. Mr. BPA himself, AJ Smith, probably cost the Chargers a championship in either 2006 or 2007 by drafting Rivers when he had a very good QB already on hand. There’s nothing wrong with Phillip Rivers, but I’d rather have Drew Brees and the 4th overall pick in the draft than him.

A TE would be much more useful than a QB, especially if they were a Winslow/Gates type, but Miller just signed a long contract and we have a ton of WR’s. If he’s good enough, he’ll get on the field, but the value over who he’s replacing is less than his value to an average team. OLB is a difficult case because we have very little depth behind our starters, but have (or soon will have) long term committments to both players. We need to get some depth there and it’s always nice to have fresh pass rushers, but it is likely to be 3-5 years before an average 1st round OLB will have a significant place in this defense.

That said, almost any other position is about even in terms of needing contributions. We could use an upgrade over Hampton/Hoke, Farrior, Clark, and Gay. We could use a stud at any position on the OL. Mendy’s been decent, but I’m not in love with him and you can always use another RB. Aaron Smith just finished his second stint on IR, I wouldn’t be heartbroken if we upgraded Keisel, and I don’t want to assume that Hood is going to be a stud.

WR is a difficult call, because we have a lot there already. However, Ward could be ineffective in a few years and Holmes is a free agent after 2010. A young guy might have a tough time fitting in at first, but he could possibly save us from spending a lot of money this offseason for an extension on Holmes. I’d value WR’s slightly lower than usual given our situation. I doubt a WR is will be the BPA at #18 anyways.

My methodology includes considering younger established vets with long term financial committments, especially in positions where backups wouldn’t get a ton of playing time if the starters are healthy when comparing the overall value two players would bring to the franchise. You have to include reasonable guesses at probability and short and long term risk when you consider the value a player would bring to your organization.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 1:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I really hope they resign Holmes…

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, for most of his career, I’ve been nonplussed with him, but our WR’s are a crapshoot without him. It all depends on how much money he wants. He doesn’t strike me as a guy who would take the hometown discount.

If I’m honest, solely from the financial standpoint, I wouldn’t sign an extension with us after this year if I were him. He’s not much of an injury risk, and his stock is only going to go up as we keep throwing the ball around the lot and Ward gets older. If he puts up 1200-1400 yards in 2010, he could probably cash in as one of the highest paid WR’s in the NFL.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

True

I think a lot of it depends on BA, which is funny. If he starts running the ball like a wise man next year Holmes numbers shouldn’t go up. Hopefully that will keep his price tag down.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Ehh…as long as he gets 1200 yards he wouldn’t leave because he isn’t getting enough touches. With Ward on the down swing Holmes will be getting plenty of looks to keep him here…at least for that reason.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

BAP all the way

Drafting a quarterback in the first round would not be stupid if that player is ranked the highest on your board when it is your turn to pick. Surely, you wouldn’t want your competitors to have the next great QB when you could have drafted him. Football is a young man’s game and a game of depth, especially as the game moves towards an 18 game season. The more talent you have the better off your team will be.

Trading down to recoup the value of a pick also must be involved with a BAP philosophy. For example, if a QB is your highest rated player when you pick, but you don’t want to pick a QB because you feel comfortable with what you have, you must trade down to recoup the value. It doesn’t mean that you should reach and select a player that is lower on your value board.

by hritzm31608 on Jan 26, 2010 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Drafting a player you can’t use to keep him from going to another team is asinine. I could see interest from a division team being a factor in determining overall value, but I couldn’t care less if the Seahawks draft a good QB. I wouldn’t be happy if the Browns drafted a good QB, but I’m still not going to mortgage my future so that one of my many competitors doesn’t get better.

If a player is the best overall value for your team, you take him. Doing anything else would be dumb. Now, the process of quantifying “value for your team” isn’t easy, as you rightly point out in your question “How can you predict what your team’s needs will be?”, and assuming the BPA is also the BVA is a reasonably good approximation. However, you can make reasonable guesses at what your team’s long term needs will be and use them to adjust your draft strategy. I don’t see how bringing other information into the equation can possibly be a bad thing. Businesses model risks and overall value all the time. There’s no reason football teams can’t as well.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I think asinine is a bit dramatic

It has worked out incredibly well for Al Davis.

No seriously though, you make an excellent point, but like Johnny says below, there’s a strong possibility we draft the player we have rated highest on the board no matter what the position is. The thing is, there are certain positions that just plain aren’t going to be on our first round board.

The glare of the spotlight is harsh, and the pressure that success breeds immense. We revere our heroes, but expect much. And criticism can come as easily as praise.

by glass0941 on Jan 27, 2010 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

You are assuming that QB will be on our "board"

Which I would bet my entire bank account that it is not. BAP will not apply to QB because we do not need a QB. I would probably bet a few dollars that our “board” is full of DBs, some MLBs, a few NTs, and a few OLs…at least at the top of it.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Saying that will

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 27, 2010 8:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Maybe

but to try to put things right in the world of forum-karma:

I think we have an outstanding #2 QB in Dennis Dixon. In the horrid event that anything kept BB from playing I’m OK with Dixon filling in. Even for an extended period. So, I don’t think we need another QB.

That said- there is NO way, IMHO, that any sane FO passes on a guy like Tim Tebow, who is simply a WINNER, in every aspect of the word: character, desire, ability, potential, history.

No team would let a guy with that kind of football heart pass them by.

Just an opinion, of course, but a strong one

by tobiathan on Jan 27, 2010 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Tim Tebow cannot throw an out pass

It doesn’t matter if he is a winner or not, if he has a weak arm. I think Tebow will have a below average NFL career at QB.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 28, 2010 8:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Saw this yesterday:
As a quarterback, Tebow is, at best, years away from being proficient. If I were to answer the question teams will have to ask in their draft room, I would grade Tim Tebow a priority free agent, at best.

This is from NFL Draft Guys, a site that looks at tape and Senior Bowl practice and so forth. This comment came after watching Tebow have several horrid days of practice in a row.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 28, 2010 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

I saw some rabble about him being sick for most of the Senior Bowl stuff…not sure how much I buy any of that.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 28, 2010 9:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Hospitalized...

Between practices with a 103 degree fever and strep throat. How it effected his passing is debatable, but I know what a 103 degree fever would do to me, and it’s not good.

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 28, 2010 9:53 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not convinced that QB

is the best position for Tebow either.

I think he’d be a potential HOFer if he converted to DB, given his athleticism, understanding of offense and obviuous desire to win and succeed.

But- Dan Marino was supposed to be too INT-prone with bad mechanics to be any kind of NFL QB…..so only time will tell.

by tobiathan on Jan 28, 2010 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

what do you possibly have to go off of

to say that tebow would be a hofer at db? something besides speculation

by klompus on Jan 28, 2010 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

He runs like a 4.7-4.8 40. Sound like the next Darrell Green to me.

The link I posted also considers the other positions he could possibly play and the learning curve he’d have at them considering he has no experience there.

I think his best bet would be getting picked around the 4th to be a FB and possible QB in a wildcat/spread option type offense. If you had a team with a mobile QB like Aaron Rodgers or Vince Young, you could have Tebow in as a FB on some downs, then switch to QB and have the normal QB be an actual threat with the ball. I don’t think the Meyer offense with Tebow would work in the NFL on a consistent basis, but in small doses it could be useful.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 29, 2010 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

so based on his speed you're going to say he can play DB?

the article you posted said he pretty much is 3 years away from doing anything, let alone something as complex as DB

by klompus on Jan 29, 2010 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

No, that was sarcasm. There are DT’s that can run a 4.7-4.8.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 29, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you read the comment at all?

Or are you just looking for an opportunity to be snide?

If there’s one thing that peeves me about comment threads it’s the fact that so many people simply look for chances to make smart remarks as opposed to any genuine desire to engage in discussion or debate.

Ultimately only time will tell about Tebow, but he should have proven by now that he is a winner and competitor if nothing else. Barring injury I see every reason to presume he will find a way to succeed in the NFL if given a chance.

What do “you have to go off of” in presuming he doesn’t have HOF potential?

Certainly not his collegiate success…

by tobiathan on Jan 29, 2010 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

his collegiate success at DB in college?

yes, I think I’ll go off of that to say that he’ll never be a HOFer at DB.

by klompus on Jan 30, 2010 9:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Non-snide response as to why Tim Tebow will not be a HOF DB:

1. He has no experience there. Even great athletes and competitors take a minimum of several years to learn a position at an NFL level, let alone a HOF level.
2. He is roughly as fast as an average LB, while most HOF DB’s are considerably faster. All I have is speculation to go by, but most scouts seem to be pegging him in as a 4.7-4.8 40 kind of guy. We’ll find out for sure at the combine if he runs (which he should).

What are the arguments that he could make the HOF as a DB? An example of someone with a similar makeup who made a similar transition would be good.

QB’s often switch to WR, TE, or RB/FB with some success. I wouldn’t dismiss claims that he could move to one of those positions in the NFL (namely TE or FB), even though I think it’s far from a given. However, WR and DB have athletic baselines that Tebow simply cannot meet, regardless of any positive traits he may have.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 31, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Marino had a solid arm though. I’ve never heard that about Tebow.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 29, 2010 9:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I've never heard that his arm wasn't solid

but I don’t spend as much time following college ball as I do on the NFL. Based on what I’ve seen about him he seems capable of succeeding at pretty much any position.

His success so far certainly ought to give him the benefit of the doubt, Danny Weurfel notwithstanding of course…

by tobiathan on Jan 29, 2010 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Great to see you back BadMaafala

Pleasure to read your analysis of draft value and I hope you are going to make some of the positional analyses heading into the draft that you have done in other years. Best value available, and projected future value to the team, are the keys to the draft and are the best interpretation of BPA theory.

The Steelers are in an excellent position this year. They have a number of team needs that could use first-round value. The only position that can truly be excluded is quarterback, with TE, WR and RB also arguably not in need of first-round value. If there was a second CB with first-round value aside from Haden, then I would have no problem going that route even with the number of young CBs on the roster. Picking 18th is a luxury for this franchise and could go a number of different ways.

One of the keys to projecting long team value is the position they play and the age of the potential draftee. For example, a guy like Maurkice Pouncey has tremendous long-term value and represents minimal risk because of his high-end athleticism and resume. He’s 20 years old and a three-year college starter in a tough conference. The position he plays is rarely picked so high, but if you project ahead to his second contract he will be a 24-year-old four-year veteran coming up for an extension, and he won’t cost as much to keep as a franchise OT, a CB or skill-position player. If the Steelers were able to trade back 7-10 spots, closer to the area that a top center should be picked, they could get maximum value out of both him, his position, and the addition of an extra second or third round selection. That’s my preferred first-round pick and strategy at this point. As you said you have to find a trade partner but there might well be a team picking later in the first round who has identified a specific player best fitting their needs. Just as an example. If Anthony Davis, Bryan Bulaga or Mike Iupati is available at No. 18, there are half a dozen teams drafting in the 20s with shaky OLs who might want to move up. But I agree with you, that sort of trade is much easier said than done.

I’ll be interested to see your analysis of Earl Thomas. I’ve seen him play a number of games. I believe he’s smaller than the listed 5-10, 197 pounds. We’ll find out for sure at the Combine. He’s played only two years. He plays a position that in the NFL brings with it a lot of high speed physical contact. I don’t trust Texas defensive backs who get first-round hype coming out of a pass-happy conference, a conference that this year did not have a lot of good quarterbacks. He is quick and has ball-hawk skills but the whole package does not impress me as mid-first-round value. There is a deep pool of projected 2-4 round value at safety. I believe a guy like Major Wright (6-1, 205, three-year starter in a tougher conference) will be just as good in the NFL and available certainly in the second round, if not early in the third. That’s the other part of projecting value: how much better is a supposed first-rounder than the guys potentially available 25-75 picks later.

In any event it is still fairly early in the draft evaluation process and we’ll see how things shake out. Looking forward to reading more of your stuff.

by steeler.lifer on Jan 26, 2010 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I love draft stuff, but I’ve been too busy to keep up on all the goings on. Even my assessment of Thomas is just based on a couple iffy scouting reports. My main thing is this: if I’m going to draft a safety, I want him to be able to defend the pass. Bob Sanders is the most overrated safety in the league because he’s a “run-stuffing safety”. Isn’t that what linebackers are for? Give me a safety who can play the deep ball and I’ll let you get a gigantic ILB to stuff the run.

As for the later S’s, I haven’t really looked over the depth. I’m sure there’s plenty of guys back there. I just want to find one who has great range and can play the pass.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2010 7:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Reshard Jones, GA

I believe that’s the first name.

by dawgs144 on Jan 28, 2010 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Drafting Rivers when Brees was on the roster

I’m not a huge fan of AJ Smith (I think he was an idiot to fire Marty after a 14-2 record), but Brees was looking like a bust until the year Rivers was drafted. It was that season that he finally started looking like the guy we see today.

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jan 26, 2010 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I looked up the stats after I wrote that. He really didn’t put it together until 2004, and I can’t really blame Smith in this case.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2010 7:50 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

14-2 record should never get you fired. Also Mr. Norv hasn’t done much better.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 27, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

No

That was not my point. My point is that their “not needing a QB” is vastly different than our “not needing a QB”. It was foolish for them to pass on Ben because their QB hadn’t proven much of anything. It would not be foolish for us to pass up a QB, even if he was the best talent available, because we absolutely do not need one. You see the difference?

The point is not picking "well what if he is injured." The point is taking the best available player because you cannot predict your injuries and you have no idea what your needs will be.

Yes. Exactly. But if you have a ton of depth at DE and not much at all at Safety don’t draft another DE just because he is the best talent available. When the “well if there is an injury” situation is covered you don’t need to add more depth.

Sure you can get tight ends in later rounds, but if a tight end is the highest rated player on your board in the first round, you take him. That’s what the Steelers did with Heath Miller. How did that pick turn out?

Yeah, but we didn’t have a Heath Miller TE back then. And the year prior to Heath we threw to a TE like 20 times. So TE was a big need then, so passing him woulda been moronic.

As far as Revis goes, CB was the Jets biggest hole in 2006-2007. Revis fit a huge need for them. If not, they would not have traded up to get him.

Drafting on BAP is good when you don’t have an absolutely huge problem, like we did last year in the secondary. If your biggest problem is stopping the pass, you lose 5 games because of it, so you draft a QB because he is the best available talent? I disagree with that.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Questions for need based picking

How can you predict what your team’s needs will be?

It would be foolish for the Steelers to not draft a QB or trade down and recoup the value of a pick if a QB is at the top of their board when it is their turn to pick. Why do you want to give the competition the more talented players, while reaching for players that aren’t as talented?

by hritzm31608 on Jan 26, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Question

How can you predict who will be injured?

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 26, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

There are those who are injury prone

and there are those who are getting old, and bodies break down. There’s a pretty good chance SOMEbody will get injured before the end of next season. Also, there’s always the possibility someone will get hurt in pre season/training camp…

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess I should rephrase the question

How can you predict who and what position will be injured accurately? Of course someone will be injured but being able to predict, who and if the depth cannot handle the position is like predicting the future. You simply can’t do it. You can have a good guess. But I think it would be rather silly to do so. Say, I dunno – Snack walks, troy and a.smith gets hurt again, and we have a porous defense once again, I don’t think anyone is going to be comforted with the fact that we have awesome depth at QB.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 26, 2010 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course not! There's no little chrystal ball in Colbert's office.

That being said, all you can do is draft/acquire depth at positions that are short. Obviously, this year, ours was defensive backfield.

Also, there’s no way in hell we’re drafting a QB in the 1st. maybe 5th-7th, but no sooner than that.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

;P

Which is precisely my point. I am wondering why hritzm is trying to argue this so hard when its common knowledge that you don’t know who is going down next year so draft that way will make you look foolish. Most likely what will happen, you’ll have injuries elsewhere or not a lot at all and it’ll make you look silly. Even still we have decent depth at QB and RB, I would say WR if I knew how Sweed is going to play. But more than likely if there is an injury it won’t be the same year in and year out and you are drafting a player that you will have for several years, You are fixing a temporary issue with a permanent issue which then give you salary problems. You don’t want to have too much money tied up in one position.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 26, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Unless there are 3 or more injuries

to the WR’s, we have plenty of depth. Tyler Grisham, and Joey Galloway (if he stays on, that is). Galloway might have lost a step or three, but so has Hines. Joey has that same exact crafty veteran-ness that Hines does. Well, maybe not exactly like Hines, but you get my point.

Dixon has my complete confidence in being the #2 QB. He put on a pretty damn good showing Vs. Balt this year.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

if only they would have let him

run more, its a shame. The man has a strength, use it.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 26, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

That looks good on paper

but, they had 2 days to come up with a whole new offensive scheme. Not enough time to make the adjustment for a 3rd string QB. If they had some time to plan, a week maybe, then maybe we would have seen something like that.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 5:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I liked the fact we threw the ball with him

because I got a chance to see he can make some NFL throws against one of the top rank defenses in the NFL. I think he did not break the pocket as often as he could have because in his mind he wanted to prove the same.

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Dixon can do both

which is why I really like him being our #2 QB. I just wish they could have game planned for his unique talents for that Balt. game.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

How can you not predict what your teams needs are?

There are several things the Steelers need: NT (assuming no Hampton resign and even then we still need to begin looking for his replacement), CB, S (depth and possibly FS starter), MLB (depth and Farrior replacement), OLB (depth), OL (we aren’t particularly deep as far as talent goes and we could improve on every spot, starter to back-ups), RB (back-up), FB (lol), (TE (depth). Those we need.

Things we don’t need QB (Ben and Dixon, solid starter and back-up, a 3rd string QB should not be drafted in the 1st round under any circumstances), WR (at least not this year, Sweed has one more shot), RB starter, TE starter, OLB starters, SS starter.

So I would most likely draft the best player available at any of those positions in the first paragraph (except probably RB and TE). However, as I stated before I think the Steelers should trade up to grab the player they really want like a NT, S, or MLB standout (McClain specifically).

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

What is the Steeler's biggest problem?

It might be the offensive line, defensive line, secondary, special teams. Do we know for certain? We cannot even identify the biggest weakness on the team so why wouldn’t you take the BAP or trade down and recoup the value of the pick. The point of the draft is to accumulate as much young talent as possible, which is exactly what the Steelers do, and fortunately, they adhere to a BAP philosophy.

by hritzm31608 on Jan 26, 2010 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re making a strawman of Johnny’s arguments. He’s not saying we should identify our biggest need and pick the best one of those, as much as we should consider needs in the draft pick valuation process.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

What's need got to do with it?

Do you realize that needs have nothing to do with value board rankings?

by hritzm31608 on Jan 26, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

False

Ask a man in a desert which is more valuable: a gallon of water or a sack full of dollar bills.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Decent analogy, and sort of applies here

Although, every other team in the league knows where the Steelers weakness is, and if they know who Colbert is targeting, well…I wouldn’t put it past a few teams to trade up and draft the one we have our eyes on. Especially if that player fits a need they have, although it doesn’t have to be as glaring as ours…

Personally, I like the idea of keeping our draft prospects close to the chest, and drafting outside of what others think we will.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 2:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree that we shouldn’t reveal who we are targeting, but teams can guess who we’ll pick regardless of what we do. The bottom line is that after the 17th pick is in, we pick the player who is most valuable to us. There’s no reason to pick someone we like less to be unpredictable.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 2:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Of course!

If the man we’ve had our eyes on is there, we will draft him. That’s kind of a no brainer.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

What "Best Available Player" Means

Remember that BAP doesn’t mean the top 100 Best Future Football Players in the abstract (as compiled by Mel Kiper or whomever).

The BAP is a list that the FO draws up, which are already taylored to the Steeler roster. It is their ranking of players the Steelers desire the most.

The simple idea that players can be ranked without any thought toward the position they play is a bit silly.

by 13thieves on Jan 26, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Absolutely!

What are you, a Browns fan in disguise?

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

You can tell by my profile pic.

by StoneColdSteel on Jan 26, 2010 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Was supposed to be funny...

Lighten up, Francis…

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

My bad

But I know someone on here still wants to trade him lol.

by StoneColdSteel on Jan 26, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Who?

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Me

Ben sucks!

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes sir! He certainly does!

Maybe we can trade him for Jamarcus Russel. Russel just needs a good organization behind him, and Ben has reached his peak…

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Hahaha =P

I figured you were referring to the guy who said we should draft a QB if he is the BAP/BPA.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah I was

I think I’ll just demand that we draft a QB in the first round every year so everybody can get it out of their system.

by StoneColdSteel on Jan 26, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd support drafting Tebow

…and turning him into a FB.

actually, no, not even then.

by Diggetydank on Jan 27, 2010 3:20 AM EST up reply actions  

?

wtf?

Did he steal your gf or something?

by tobiathan on Jan 28, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Why?

Too nice? Dislike him for the sake of disliking him?

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 29, 2010 8:46 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

for knowing when NOT to rant.

More people should have this much wisdom and self-discipline.

That does at least explain your reaction to mentions of Tebow.

by tobiathan on Jan 29, 2010 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree trading down would make sense.

         Trading down is always a possibility. But we will have to wait till the final ratings are in after the combine to see who is ranked where. Right now there are no NTs or centers ranked above the mid to late 1st round.

by steeler junky on Jan 26, 2010 10:42 AM EST reply actions  

NT

the biggest boy out there! We’ll work on his “talent” thing later. Love Casey but, he was only 2 or 3 downs per series as it was. He’s still a beast, but he is getting older. To not plan ahead for this is plain madness. I would look to ILB too, but I do like the Fox and Timmons combo meal.
I’m still waiting to see Redman come back and steal the hearts of all yall next preseason. We still have depth at RB either way, but he certainly has the Steeler football feel to the way he runs.

"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.

by kick him in the head on Jan 26, 2010 10:43 AM EST reply actions  

ILB McClain in trade-up or D. Williams does it for me ...

If you don’t do those two, trade down and use several picks to try and rebuild your D. Blitz, I don’t think U can put all your eggs in the basket of Burnett and K. Lewis. Neither showed nothing this year to indicate that they will be starters in the future. In fact, all Lewis had to do was tackle someone on special teams to earn a hat each week and he couldn’t do that.

The Steelers need to come out of this offseason with a starting-caliber CB and another who is waiting in the wings. Ike is in his last year, and I’m not for paying a CB big money that doesn’t make any plays on the ball or prevent his man from catching the ball. Ike isn’t a game changing CB so I’m not going to pay him like one.

Again, my options for this 1st round are: 1) Trade up for Rolando McClain; 2) Take NT D. Williams at 18; 3) Trade down, pick up extrad picks and take LT A. Davis from Rutgers, Mike Pouncey from Florida or Jared Odrick from Penn State.

by datruth4life on Jan 26, 2010 11:35 AM EST reply actions  

Large Benjamin

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Wait....I might not be thinking straight right now...

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 1:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah, see...I wasn't thinking straight...

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

BB

And we didn’t trade up for Ben, we drafted 11th which is where we were supposed to draft the entire time.

by TheRebelMonk on Jan 26, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah. I thought as much after posting that...

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

Last two we traded up for were Holmes and Polamalu

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Right

I knew there was another time before Troy but I couldn’t remember who it was.

by 13thieves on Jan 27, 2010 1:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Too high for Williams

The stock is falling quickly on Dan Williams. If he does not have a good Senior Bowl, he could fall out of the 1st round as well. The Steelers will NOT take a NT in round 1, regardless of what happens with Big Snack. Take that to the bank. The Steelers have numerous ways they can go in the 1st round and will have the luxury of taking the BPA. There is no way they go up for McClain either. Hate to be the Buzz killer here. The article above is pretty much a captain obvious statement about the corner position.

by Cracker Jack Black on Jan 26, 2010 6:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Well it is a bit early

to say he will drop from the 1st round. We haven’t even had the combines yet.. All of this talk is early, but it is fun.

Are you a a Tenn U fan? Have you watched him play?

by SteelBuckeye on Jan 26, 2010 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

So I"m guessing you

think they will go Oline right?

Why you say there is no way they go up for McClain?

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 27, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

On Dan Williams? I that he was having a great Senior Bowl week

and that Cody from Alabama was the one people were disappointed with?

by dawgs144 on Jan 28, 2010 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Mike Mayock said he believe G/T Iupati could play all 5 positions on OL

He said although Iupati played LG, after watching film, he think he has the feet to play RT and even some LT. If he is that good, then he might be my no. 3 option after a trade down by the Steelers to take. I still like McClain and D. Williams as top 2 options, but Iupati is closing on at no. 3.

by datruth4life on Jan 26, 2010 12:13 PM EST reply actions  

The problem at CB

I understand we have Taylor and all 3 of Gay, Lewis and Burnett are young but here’s the thing – none of these guys have shown any kind of ball skills whatsoever. The biggest problem in the secondary when Polamalu is injured is that there isn’t a single player that poses a threat to intercept a pass. IMO QBs can attempt much more dangerous passes against our secondary because they don’t have to worry about the repercussions of a turnover.

In three years Gay has one interception, Burnett dropped the only pass he could have intercepted this year and Lewis couldn’t even make the gameday roster.

And I wouldn’t say Ike Taylor is entrenched at corner for the foreseeable future. Next year yes but 2010 is a contract year for Ike and he’ll be over 30 years old for his next contract. Whose to say the team doesn’t let him hit free agency in 2011. It would be nice to have more options.

All of that said there aren’t really any corners that scream automatic 1st rounder this year outside of Joe Haden. So really unless Haden miraculously falls to us, this is probably a moot discussion.

by catesinator on Jan 26, 2010 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

DT/NT/S 1st

QB – We can add a project QB later because Dennis Dixon showed a lot of promise. We need to eventually replace Charlie Batch so a young project QB will work in later rounds or finding one on the market.

RB – We have quality at this position. Mandenhall, Carey Davis, Moore and the promise of Redman will do us just fine for the next couple years at least. Unless we can find a RB that would be a great special teamer then no need to go there. Mandenhall will be an every down back in 2010.

WR – We should be ok for the next couple years especially if Limas Sweed bounces back this year which I believe he will. His only problem was drops. In order for him to drop the ball he has to get open in order for Ben to throw to him. I would hate to see him in another uniform getting open and not dropping the ball showing the promise we drafted. I still like Holmes, Ward, Wallace and Sweed and Tyler Grishman as our five WR. With Holmes, Ward and Wallace there’s no need to get a WR until later in the draft or as an undrafted rookie that would bolster the special teams.

TE – No need here unless we can find a great special teams TE

C – I would like to see Doug Legursky take Hartwig starting position. If he can not we need a center badly. Hartwig is not the answer. Next to LG, C is the weakest position on the starting OL. Hartwig would be a great back up.

G – I’m not against taking a G/C in the first round. I think Urbik will be better suited at RT. I agree with most if we bring Colon back he would be better suited at RG. Regardless both L/R G position needs to be addressed. Kemoeatu needs a back up and competition. We also need serious competition on the right side of the line and C period.

T – I’m ok with our left side although I would like to see Hill at LT and Stark at RT. Hill is younger, quicker and lighter which means he should be lighter on his feet than Starks. Starks struggles with smaller/quicker DE/OLB. But Starks was the best lineman on the OL last year so I’m ok with him staying at LT and Hill and Udrik competing at RT.

C, RG & RT need to be addressed or Tomlin’s young linemen need to step up. Hill (T), Legursky ©, Urbik (G/T), Foster (G) will need to develop. With our new o-line coach I believe we can go with what we have on the o-line unless we have a gem fall in our laps in the first round. But give the new o-line coach a year to evaluate and develop the young guys and go from there. I believe we brought him in to develop our young lineman who has failed to develop under coach Z. His track record last year proves he can work with and develop young talent.

DE – Unless we have a gem fall in our laps here there’s no need. We just need to play Eason, Harris and Hood more. They still have time to develop and come in on passing downs as long as Smith and Keisel stays healthy. I’m not against replacing Kirschke 35 but we can address that in later rounds. Let’s see what the younger guys can do this year.

DT/NT – Regardless if we resign Hampton or not we still need a young stud in the middle. Hoke 33 is solid but he’s not big enough in my opinion at 6’ 2" 305 when Hampton is 6’ 1" 325 (yeah right more like 350). I’m not against taking the best 3 – 4 DT/NT in the draft at number 1. I believe this position needs to be addressed first because there’s no young talent being groomed under Hampton and Hoke. I would keep Hoke over Kirschke due to position flexibility and age. Hoke can play DE as well and is probably better suited there because of his size. He’s the same size as the other DE’s.

LB – I believe we are ok here but can address the ILB position later in the draft. For the next year or two we can use Farrior on run downs and bring in Fox on passing downs with Fox taking over in the next two years. Once that happens the later round ILB will have a couple years to develop and challenge Fox for his spot. We still have Frazier and Bailey which both could develop in the next couple years. We need more special team help which we can find a good LB to play special teams in the later rounds that could challenge Frazier and Bailey for a roster spots because he’s better than both on special teams.

CB – Once again if there’s a gem here no question but I would rather see Tomlin boys work out in this position. Burnett, Gay and Lewis are Tomlin boys and I don’t see him giving up on them unless there’s a gem to fall in our lap. If that happens Anthony Madison is Cowher’s boy and he will be the man out.

S – This is a must address in the first or second round. Another one of Tomlin boys will have more experience and I’m hoping can beat our Clark. Ryan Mundy will be better next to Troy at this point. We can draft two young S to replace Clark and Carter. We may have to keep one but we need to young guys to come into training camp to push one or both out the door.

S is second on my list to NT because we have hopes in Mundy and no hopes at NT after Hampton or to back up Hampton. Once again Hoke is good but we need young fresh legs to push the middle of the pocket and get some sacks/hits on QBs.

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 1:09 PM EST reply actions  

Great analysis

I agree with NT and S being a high priority depending on how FA pans out. In regards to the Oline, I’m interested to see if Kugler can develop Urbik into a road-grading starter at either G or RT. The kid is young and raw, and the coach has done it before with great success. Fingers crossed.

by TomlinsPuffyJacket on Jan 26, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

nice work!

Some comments:

RB – I’m going out on a limb and saying we draft a FB in the 5th round. RB in rounds 4+ is a possibility as well if they don’t return FWP.

C – Might be an interesting battle in camp.

T — Hills is largely unproven. In the past they used Essex vs quicker DE guys.

*-The OL coach had rookies in Buffalo, but fairly highly rated ones. Not 5th rounders and UDFA pickups.

DE – I think you see one more. Takes time to learn the position. Harris was never even game day active.

NT – I’d like to see Williams or Brian Price in the draft. Could have Harris, McCLendon or Paxson filling this role perhaps.

LB — Massive need for depth at both positions. OLB guys take time and we have nobody in the pipline.

DB – K. Lewis was never gameday active. I’ve heard that he had back issues. Drafting a good corner is never a waste. K. Lewis also has FS potential. My guess is a corner is picked in the top three rounds.

S – Huge need here. Need to replace Clark (FA) and Carter (stinks)

by Steely McSmash on Jan 26, 2010 9:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Skills can be taught

I understand the secondary ball handling skills are limited. That’s why I was hoping Horton would go and we could bring in someone that could teach the young guys ball handling skills. That’s a skill that can be taught and its obvious to me that’s not the case. Positioning body/feet/hands, looking the ball all the way into your hands and securing the ball are skills that can be taught. We need to get Rod Woodson in as a consultant or something to teach this skill. Why are we not seeking him to coach our secondary or to come in as a consultant. Where is Cornell Lake?

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 1:24 PM EST reply actions  

Most of these guys have been playing since middle school. If they haven’t learned by the time they’re non-rookies in the NFL, they’re not going to. A lot of it is instincts and reaction time. Look at Willie Parker and Ike Taylor. They just don’t have natural “hands”.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Steelers History

Steelers have a history of taking players and molding them. Yes instinct and reaction has a lot to do with it but not all. Look at NO Saints. The defense finished in the bottom half if not last in total defense but finished in top 5 in takeaways (4th I believe). That’s because their coach specialize and teaches stripping the ball and reacting to the ball to create turnovers. I’m a fan of teaching and training. There are plenty of Steelers (James Harrison trained by LB coach Butler) that have been taught and trained a skill and became good at what they do. Another example, Russ Grim took average talent and developed one of the best lines during his time. Skill can be taught and make up for the lack of natural instinct and reaction. I believe in taking what you have and making it better. I believe the Steelers use the same philosophy. Blue collar/average players turned into NFL Superbowl champs

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Russ Grimm took a bunch of really high draft picks and FA signings and molded them into a top OL.

And catching the ball is a talent. It’s not like Sweed and Taylor aren’t working at it, they just aren’t good at it. Although Sweed still has some promise in this area because apparently he catches the ball in practice, just not in the games. Once again though, it’s not a matter of desire or work ethic, they need to be talented.

by Cols714 on Jan 26, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Depends on who is available.

I agree that CB isn’t the top priority, but if we get a chance to draft a top athlete who can play right away, I’d hate to pass him up. But certainly not in preference to drafting a top DL guy, especially a nose tackle, who can step right in and play. I think Farrior’s decline has been somewhat exaggerated. He’s definitely not as quick as he used to be, but I think he was trying to compensate for having no help back there for most of the 2009 season. I don’t think we need to draft another LB #1. We can get someone in round #2 who eventually can start.

But it’s amazing how good your secondary looks when your DL line and blitzing LBs are constantly pressuring the opponent’s QB. And you’re right about the kids we drafted last year. We need to get these guys in the games and see what they’re made of.

by Billy52 on Jan 26, 2010 1:33 PM EST reply actions  

Offensive Line

I find it interesting that there was no mention that our offensive line needs some upgrades via the draft or otherwise. If Polamalu is healthy, the defensive backfield will be fine for another year. The offensive line is second-rate. If we are to start running more, we need better personnel up front. And if we continue to pass most of the time — and at very predictable moments — then Big Ben will sooner not later be a casualty with the line he has to protect him.

regis18

by Schmedlap on Jan 26, 2010 1:46 PM EST reply actions  

No serious changes to o-line

I can’t see the o-line being addressed unless there’s someone on the Steelers board that is a must have because Tomlin has drafted some o-linemen (Hill (T), Legursky ©, Urbik (G/T), Foster (G)). To draft an o-lineman would say all the lineman Tomlin has drafted were a bust unless its a must have guy that’s very high on the Steelers board.

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Legursky and Foster are UDFA pickups

I think an OL is in the works for 1st or 2nd round. AR 2’s dictate to run the ball better should drive some better skill on the OL. If you look at all the good running teams they have invested in the OL.

I think RG is the weakest position at the moment. Some of the RT prospects could play at OG as well.

by Steely McSmash on Jan 26, 2010 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not asinine, it's what teams do

Do you disagree with trading the pick and recouping the value? Or, do you reach for a player because that’s the alternative, which is poor draft strategy. Just ask the Jaguars before Gene Smith took over.

by hritzm31608 on Jan 26, 2010 2:04 PM EST reply actions  

Give me one example of a team with a good QB that drafted another QB in the first in an attempt to keep him away from another team.

As far as trading down, in theory, it’s a good idea, but it’s difficult to get full value for your pick unless someone is trading up to target a specific player. If Jimmy Clausen fell to #18, I would look for suitors who were willing to trade a lot for him. In 2007, though, once Revis was gone, I don’t think we would have gotten good value for trading down.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Didn't the browns draft BQ when they already had a "decent" starter?

Sucks to be them- even I didn’t think BQ would turn out as poorly as he did.

by SteelersVT on Jan 26, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, that was the year before DA went to the Pro Bowl. They targeted Quinn because they didn’t know they had a passable option and because he was from Cleveland. Which, as it turns out, is a stupid reason to draft someone.

charity standing orders

by BadMaafala on Jan 26, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Except I think we should get the Pitt Panthers PK when he enters the draft

He plays half his games at Heinz field, and has something like a 73%+ accuracy over 40 yds…

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

If McClain falls past 10th overall...

I’d be making some calls. I was a big proponent of drafting an ILB last year, and when Maualuga fell to us, I was really excited. Clearly we also needed defensive line help, and we went that route (and it looks like a good pick, so I’m not complaining).

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 2:17 PM EST reply actions  

Best Player Available?

Yes, typically, I would agree with the steady hand approach of BAP, but we have depth and age issues which need to be addressed immediately. I don’t think we can get the help we need in free agency (due to lack of impact players and the price the good ones will command), so we have to look at needs somewhat in the draft. First, let’s look at where we don’t need to spend a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd round pick: QB (Ben, Dixon, and we could nab a vet on the cheap in FA), WR (Ward, Holmes, Sweed, Wallace, Galloway….worst case scenerio: 4th and 5th WRs can be had in FA-if needed), RB (Mendy, Moore, Tank, C.Davis, Redman, Vincent…good enough), TE (Miller, Spaeth, Johnson, McHugh…should be fine even if Spaeth leaves), G (Stapleton, Kemo, Essex, Foster, Urbik, did I forget anyone?). K/P – No kicker/punter worth a 1st, 2nd, or 3rd round pick.

So, what do we really need? That leaves: OT, DE, DT, LB, CB, S

Here are the main priorities for rounds 1-2:

OT: Colon and Starks are the only real tackles on the team, and Colon is a free agent. Hills is getting cut unless he’s the only backup.

DT: Hampton and Hoke…Hampton is a free agent, Hoke is older than Hampton.

S: Clark, Carter, Mundy: Clark and Carter are free agents, Mundy hasn’t shown enough to be a starter.

I would target for rounds 3-5:

LB: Beyond our starters, there isn’t much depth. Fox could probably spell Farrior and that would be ok. We could really use depth at both LB positions.

DE: Our starters are solid, but getting up there in age, therefore, getting younger and meaner isn’t a bad idea. We have Ziggy, and possibly Sonny waiting in the wings, but the proven backups like Kirschke and Eason are over 30.

I would target late as projects, rounds 6-7:

CB: We drafted Lewis and Burnett last year, so they may be good in time. I feel we should be ok at CB, and not panic. Taking a gamble on a CB late is fine.

LB: Taking another linebacker late to compete with P. Bailey and A. Frazier for backup LB positions and special teams is a good idea.

Really, anything after round 3 is a crapshoot. I mean, you always hope your players pan out, but you really want your top 3 picks to be able to come into camp and make the team. It’s difficult when you are the Pittsburgh Steelers, however, because there is a lot of talent on this team already. The downside is that the experienced players come with age, and we need to get younger. So, like the last few seasons, there will be guys with potential let go (Sonny Harris, Ryan McBean, Bruce Davis, Jason Capizzi) because they don’t show enough to beat the veterans out of a job; and there will veterans let go, because of the potential ceilings of new players from the draft and free agency.

Myself, I hope for a safety with 4.2 speed that can cover and tackle. That way, over CBs can be somewhat average, and not be exposed. However, having a premier NT is essential in the AFC North.

by twault on Jan 26, 2010 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

Don't sleep on Ike

Ike was the second best corner in the league in ’08. In ’05, he was one of the best. Granted, Ike had a down year last year where he was about average, as far as CBs in this league go.

But Ike had a down year in 06, as well. The next year, he came back strong. The year after that, even stronger. The point: no need to find a #1 CB. Ike can be that guy, despite his inconsistencies. There are far more pressing needs then replacing a #1 CB who had an average (as far as the league goes) year.

by CarlWeathersMustache on Jan 26, 2010 2:42 PM EST reply actions  

Ike's not getting replaced

Although, he IS 30, and there’s very few CB’s that play later than that. Woodson, Al Harris, and Neon Deion come to mind.

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I still say it's Iupati

Everybody thinks we’re going heavy on defense because of our struggles last season. If Iupati is there I say we take him and move Kemo to RG. And I hear Mount Cody’s been having weight issues again. If he slides should we risk it?

by StoneColdSteel on Jan 26, 2010 4:00 PM EST reply actions  

Holy Feces!

He looks like Al Roker pre-stomach stapling…

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 6:10 PM EST up reply actions  

and I thought my manboobs looked bad

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: DIck Lebeau, Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
I want to have sex with this moment. And get this moment pregnant. VAsaintsfan after the 2009 NFC championship game

by WVPiratesfan on Jan 26, 2010 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE would people start watching tape instead of Bandwagonning!

"Every Day I walk past 6 Lombardi trophies not 6 rushing titles" - Greatest Tomlinism ever.

by Josh Roberts (ESGB) on Jan 26, 2010 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

He doesn't

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 11:55 PM EST up reply actions  

still trying to figure out why someone is rubbing his belly

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: DIck Lebeau, Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
I want to have sex with this moment. And get this moment pregnant. VAsaintsfan after the 2009 NFC championship game

by WVPiratesfan on Jan 27, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

And it's a guy, at that...Icky-poo...LOL

Just kidding. Mrs. Fever is going to have two drag queens as two of her bridesmaids, so don’t start thinking in a homophobe, or anything…

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 27, 2010 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I was just wonder why

who knows it might have been a lost bet or he just wanted to

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: DIck Lebeau, Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
I want to have sex with this moment. And get this moment pregnant. VAsaintsfan after the 2009 NFC championship game

by WVPiratesfan on Jan 27, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm guessing...

It was more of a poorly timed photo. Looks like he may just be trying to direct Big Snacks away from the oversized lap dance he appears to be receiving.

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 27, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Or trying to keep him from toppling over

humpty-dumpty style…

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 27, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think any mortal can keep big snack from toppling over

but this man can

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: DIck Lebeau, Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
I want to have sex with this moment. And get this moment pregnant. VAsaintsfan after the 2009 NFC championship game

by WVPiratesfan on Jan 27, 2010 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

DEEBO!!!!!!!

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 27, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

i'll eat my words then (ironically)

snack looks muscular despite being known for being overweight. i guess this is why nose tackles are such rare athletes

by klompus on Jan 27, 2010 9:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Correction: GOOD NT's are rare athletes

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 27, 2010 9:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Gross...

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 27, 2010 8:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Draft WINNERS

Last year I was hoping the Steelers would pick Shonn Greene ( the guy carried Iowa on his back) but nooooo,they draft a ziggy. The year before that its Mendenhall ( a total bust) and limestone seaweed ,(even worse),oh yeah another bust in Dixson. Mendenhall is a crackhead and can’t take a hit.WE NEED Toby Gerheart,Tim Tebow in that order.These guys are proven winners.If you rely on the scouting reports ,you are an idiot.

by txsteeler on Jan 26, 2010 4:09 PM EST reply actions  

This is a joke right?

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

We should draft Tebow to Throw and Catch (yes I mean to himself, see Brett Favre’s 1st game) and to run. He would be the most prolific NFL producer in the history of NFL prolific productions. I’m on board!

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Remember when

The Steelers passed on Dan Marino because the scouts said he threw too many INTs

by txsteeler on Jan 26, 2010 4:15 PM EST reply actions  

Yup...

Mistake. Your point?

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

No Mistake

Did Dan Marino win a superbowl?

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Did the Steelers...

During his career?

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Why do we need Tebow?

Or Gerhart for that matter? Can either of them play safety or corner? How about NT?

by StoneColdSteel on Jan 26, 2010 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Tebow can play safety, corner and nose tackle...

All at once. Bow to the greatness that is Timothy Richard Tebow. (By the way, I would actually draft him, if he fell to us in the third or fourth, I like Tebow.)

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions  

No

But they went to the Superbowl the 1995 season and lost to Neil O’Donnell and the Cowboys. They also went to the AFC Championship game and was 3 points away from winning the superbowl in a lost to Denver 24 – 21.

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you think we would have had a better chance...

With a past prime (but veteran savvy) Dan Marino, or Neil O’Donnell, who, give him credit for what he did for us while he was here, never was an elite quarterback. His best year as a passer he had 17 touchdowns. In Dan’s worst season in which he started all 16 games he threw 16.

Combine Marino with the very tail end of the Steel Curtain guys, and he wins that Superbowl in 1984, and maybe another. Just my opinion though, and this is one of those no one is right, everything is hypothetical debates anyway, sooo… yeah.

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree

I do think Dan would have been an upgrade compared to the QBs we had during his career no doubt. I think they passed on him because we were a smash mouth football team and the org didn’t think he fit what we were all about. I agree all hypothetical at this point.

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought the Steelers didn’t draft him cuz of the rumors he smoked weed.

by Diggetydank on Jan 27, 2010 3:37 AM EST up reply actions  

No, that's the reason they didn't draft me.

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 27, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Marino supposedly had weed problems, but also were produced by, also supposedly by the Fins (1º cheaters))


Also from Wk:

Gabriel Rivera (born 1961) is a former All American football defensive tackle. Rivera was the 21st selection of the 1983 NFL Draft by the Pittsburgh Steelers. Rivera attended Texas Tech and was nicknamed “Señor Sack.”

The selection of Rivera is notable because the Pittsburgh Steelers decided to pass on hometown boy and University of Pittsburgh quarterback Dan Marino as an heir apparent to Terry Bradshaw. The decision was made to rebuild from the defensive side as they did a decade earlier with “Mean Joe” Greene. Rivera was considered one the fastest defensive linemen coming out of college.

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on Jan 28, 2010 3:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Draft Winners

Here is a list of proven winners not rated very high in previous drafts: Tom Brady,Kurt Warner,Brett Favre, Drew Brees,Jerome Bettis, Hines Ward,

by txsteeler on Jan 26, 2010 4:20 PM EST reply actions  

I never really liked the term "proven winners"

All those guys are or were just tremendous at what they do. Call it great athletes or great football players.

Anyway, here is a list of “proven winners” from college:
Alex Smith, Jamarcus Russell, Ryan Leaf, Tim Couch, Art Schlichter, etc…

The list of players who were good in college and “okay” to flops in the NFL is very very long.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

You missed Joey Harrington...

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Research...

Jerome Bettis was the tenth overall pick of the draft. Drew Brees was taken with the first pick of the second round. Brett Favre was the second or third pick in the second round. That’s fairly highly rated.

Tom Brady had limited playing time in college. Hines Ward switched positions a few times in college, which made him more difficult to guage, but was still taken in the third round, which is not that late, really.

If you’re trying to prove it’s an inexact science, I do agree. But…

Ken Dorsey= Proven winner right? What did he lose two games in college?

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

And Warner hasn't won anything since he was with the Rams...

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 11:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah but

He took the “worst” team in the POs last year and stunned all of the top NFC teams to get to the SB.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 27, 2010 8:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Brady took his team two years ago too...

Sooo….Brady + no cheating = Warner…LOL

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 27, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha

I can’t argue with math!

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 27, 2010 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Brady, proved cheater, and (s)tuck nfl friend.

O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by YeOldeMexFan on Jan 28, 2010 3:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Draft Winners

Toby Gerheart is a John Riggins style running back(he carried the redskins on his back) The Steelers have had trouble closing games because we coudn’t run the clock out and had to rely on our defense.Now, Gerheart would change all of that and it would keep Mendenhall fresh.

by txsteeler on Jan 26, 2010 4:26 PM EST reply actions  

What about Bruce Campbell from MD?

One of the best OLs in the draft. He played for the 2-10 Terps. If he fell to us, we shouldn’t draft him because he is not a proven winner, right?

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not going to preach spelling... I make mistakes too...

But if he’s a player we “NEED”, spell his name right. Gerhart. I’m not a great speller, but if I was trying to make a case for a guy graded as a third round pick to be taken 18th overall, and I wanted people to take me seriously, I’d try to spell it right.

And Riggins most certainly did not carry the Redskins on his back. They had an all time great offensive line, Russ Grimm included. They had a hall of fame receiver in Art Monk, a few solid quarterbacks (well, solid except for one’s ankle) and a hall of fame coach pulling the strings. I love the Diesel, he was a big part of those teams, but he did not carry them.

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

He did however carry many a defender on his back.

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

End of Games

At the end of games he carried them on his back. When needed and called upon he shoulder the load well.

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 4:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree that we NEED Gerhart

b/c I think he can convert short yardage and TDs in the RZ and gain 5ypc at will.

But- I won’t pretend to know when we need to draft him. I personally think he’d be a huge asset to the run game and would, in fact, both help the offense AND defense close out games with clock-killing runs. IMO he’d be a true steal in the 2nd or 3rd round.

And, I’d love to see Tebow commit himself to playing S in the NFL. I think he’d be an All-Pro right away. But I don’t know if he’s a 1st round pick, unless a team thinks he can QB for them.

by tobiathan on Jan 27, 2010 6:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Draft Winners

Look at what Shonn Greene did for the jets. Believe it or not ,he helped the defense by giving them much needed rest,taking time off of the clock. Any defense will get tired and give up big plays if their offense cannot controll the clock. Look at the colts,great QB and great running game.Our defense is not bad,our offense and the play calling sucks.

by txsteeler on Jan 26, 2010 4:37 PM EST reply actions  

I’m sorry did you just say the Cols have a great running game?

by worldtrip on Jan 26, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey... worldtrip...

Beat me to it. Were they last or second to last in rushing yards this year?

'I’ve learned to become a flat-liner. There’s a lot out there that’ll make your heart jump if you allow it."
-Coach Tomlin

by NYSteelersFan4 on Jan 26, 2010 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks

I’ve become a bit of a lurker

by worldtrip on Jan 26, 2010 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Why?

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 6:11 PM EST up reply actions  

+1 :)

For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jan 26, 2010 10:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Best Talent

Our best talent on offense has been our QB and WRs. We did what we had to do to come close to winning another Superbowl. We have the skill players in place now we just need to get the o-line playing better and we will be back to ball control and dominate football on offense. Everyone wants to blam BA play calling but he called the games to our strength.

by trusteelfan on Jan 26, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

What about the O-line that features at least three first round picks?

Do you think that may have something to do with their success?

I getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.

by Steel in FL on Jan 27, 2010 8:56 AM EST up reply actions  

You don't take a corner in round 1 unless his name is Woodson,

(or maybe Revis). Hell, Mel Blount was a 3rd rounder.

"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway

by SubLime on Jan 26, 2010 4:41 PM EST reply actions  

Earl Thomas VS Eric Berry

I am glad to hear so many good things about Earl. However I want to ask a question. If Eric and Earl were available which would you pick and why?

Hard Work Pays Off!!

by greenm on Jan 26, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions  

I would say Earl

Only because he has the ability and size to swap back and forth from S to LB

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 26, 2010 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Not Earl

Thomas is the smallest and worst against the run of the Safeties in this class (well the good ones anyway)

"Every Day I walk past 6 Lombardi trophies not 6 rushing titles" - Greatest Tomlinism ever.

by Josh Roberts (ESGB) on Jan 26, 2010 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Not Earl

he is a smaller safety than the other 1st-3rd round guys and often gets shown up in run support, I think you either mean Taylor Mays or meant to put CB not LB :)

"Every Day I walk past 6 Lombardi trophies not 6 rushing titles" - Greatest Tomlinism ever.

by Josh Roberts (ESGB) on Jan 26, 2010 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah CB...I have been making some mental errors today

I don’t know why…

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Jan 27, 2010 12:12 AM EST up reply actions  

The only RB...

….Earl Thomas can beat down is Darren Sproles and that’s if Sproles is drunk.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Jan 26, 2010 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

We are all geniuses

I agree with whoever thought Iupati, after seeing some of this guy on NFL draft preview and watching tape, I believe this guy could be the next Faneca.Thats saying alot, but watching him pull through and move like a guy who weighs 275 and mow down lbs.,and at 6’6 and 330 we would suddenly be running down people like the old Bus days. I also think that Jimmy Cordle from Ohio State will be available later in the draft, and if this kid had stayed at center during his college career I honestly belive he’d be the highest rated center, Kiper has him rated in the top ten at tackle and he is a bit on the smallish side for tackle but very athletic for the center position.I have to agree that if Mclain is available we would have to take him, but this draft is so deep at db and safety that it should be one of the most interesting in years.

by wmd3 on Jan 26, 2010 7:21 PM EST reply actions  

I still think we should address the secondary early

I think our actions on draft day will be largely determined by what we do in free agency prior to the draft. I see the Steelers extending Woodley and Holmes this offseason as they are in the final year of their contracts. William Gay is not the answer and I believe he would be better served by reducing his role in the defense as a nickleback. Keenan Lewis has the physical tools but he couldn’t even find a role on special teams this year which is an ominous sign. Burnett was brought in primarily as a punt returner and he certainly didn’t impress there. We are thin, thin, thin at corner. I don’t know about you guys but I’m not to excited about the prospect of hoping we get improvement from Gay and significant upgrade at year two with Lewis(forget about Burnett, he IS NOT a starting corner in the NFL.) So what should we do? Make a BOLD move and move UP in the draft to grab Joe Haden. He is a future shutdown corner and the only true shutdown corner in the draft. Rember the last time we moved up, we landed #43 for the secondary.If we resign Clark, which the Steelers indicate they would like to do at the right price,our secondary which would consist of a healthy Troy, Clark,Taylor and Haden would be a very solid secondary for years to come.

by Dr Del on Jan 26, 2010 11:33 PM EST reply actions  

2010 Draft - Damo Style!

I know this isn’t what most of you guys have in mind, and trust me I know the defense needs some young players that are capable of stepping in quickly. The boos may rain down at Heinz Field, but with cap issues and current depth in 2nd and 3rd round talent – Here goes… (Also, this is all hinging on the assumption we will resign Casey Hampton)

1st Round – Move down in draft if we can pick up additional 2nd – 5th round picks (preferrably 2). If still available in late first round, I take CJ Spiller. [WHAT?!?] Yes, this would be my pick. Trust me folks, Fast Willie will not be in Black & Gold next year. CJ is a multi-skill tremendous athlete with talent running, returning, and recieving. This puts him in on 3rd down, PR & KR, and he can even be thrown in on 4WR patterns as he was at Clemson. Too much immediate value to pass up based on what would be left defensively in the first round. [Do we really want to keep the keys to the offense with BA without some new weapon? I have much more faith in Lebeau’s ability to get things right on the defensive side with the least help]

2nd Round – (Hopefully we have 2 picks here, but that is best-case scenario.) The Steelers take safety Chad Jones from LSU with their 2nd pick. At 6-3, 230lbs. this guy is big and fast and is a great run stopping safety. I love everything I see from him and if we don’t have Ryan Clark, this guy has a chance to start and make an immediate impact.

3rd Round – (Again I am hoping we have an extra pick this round, but I will take only one.) The Steelers draft linebacker Micah Johnson out of Kentucky. Micah is very similar in playing style to Keyaron Fox, but with better speed and run stopping ability. He is also familiar with Farrior’s role as defensive captain, as he was with the Wildcats. This fills the need at MLB and also gives us an immediate upgrade on special teams coverage.

4th Round (1) – I would take the very underrated CB Myron Lewis out of Vandy. Myron has good size at 6-2 and also good speed at 4.5… He did very well in the SEC and shut down some awfully good WRs. This guy has a tremendous upside and comeon with a name like “Myron” how could we miss on this one!?!

4th Round (2)- The Steelers draft Defensive Tackle Cam Thomas out of UNC. At 6-3 and weighing in at a nice 330lbs, this guy is a line of scrimmage beast. He played great against Pitt in the Mieneke Car Care Bowl and was an every down player for a great UNC Defense. This guy is who I think of when I think of the college version of Casey Hampton. He should be available and I think this would be a very valuable 4th round pick if he’s still there.

5th Round – This is dreaming a bit, but I’ll go with Matt Tennant, center from Boston College. This guy is the re-creation of one of my all time favorites, Mike Webster. He’s a strong dirt-nosed player with a lot of intensity. He played very well against some good D-lines in the ACC. The knock on him is his height, but he gets nice and low in his stance. Will work well learning the offense behind Hartwig for a year.

Well this fills some much needed positions on the roster and the remaining picks should be best available athletes and perhaps a solid deep kicker in the 6th or 7th round like Salerno from Northern Illonois. As far as WR, I would look to free agency where there are plenty of solid 4th WRs.

by Stillerz Damo on Jan 27, 2010 10:12 AM EST reply actions  

Any chance you are my cousin?

I’ve never known anyone else to go by Damo, but him.

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 27, 2010 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

not sure. From Elizabeth, PA

by Stillerz Damo on Jan 27, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

I guess not

He was from Steubenville, OH

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 27, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Steubenville represent!

That place has unfortunately gone downhill since I left in the late 80’s. at least the pizza is still good..

by SteelersVT on Jan 27, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Brunos and that other one are delicious

"When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my a**!"
-Bobby Knight

by John Stephens on Jan 27, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

BPA ... BPA .... BPA !

As always, lots of informed insights.

I agree with Damo Style – if he’s available, I’d take CJ Spiller. Better than Harvin and not far different than Chris Johnson. You want to improve the OL? Sign FA guard (dude from Tenn). Resign Colon. And get something out of Foster/Essex/Stapleton or Urbik (hello last year’s OTHER 3rd round pick) at RG and play ‘em in front of the best 1-2 RB combo in the history of the NFL. But Spiller won’t be there at #18 …

Don’t take CB/S in Rd 1 – unless Berry is there. The prospects at these positions are NOT 1st Rd value.

BPA – LB to replace Farrior, or monster OL to make my above points irrelevant … Iupati looks pretty good.

They can find new NT and/or S later in the draft.

Also, I think they should do a “Jets lite” …. trade a few picks if necessary to land 3 or 4 monster players, rather than drafting 8-9 guys and cutting 4-5 of ‘em. Roster is already very deep, with lots of young CB’s and OL prospects. 1 or 2 crazy studs that step in immediately (ala Mike Wallace) and we’re playing in SB 45.

McClain or Berry ?? Hell yes, trade up for ’em, like they did for Troy back in the day.

by Watty4ever on Jan 27, 2010 5:02 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah where are some of these O-line guys we have drafted in past couple years? One or two of them have to step up or look to FA.

I dont believe we will trade up based on our cap situation. I would absolutely LOVE Rolando McClain, but not happenin. The Rooney’s won pay big money to both safeties [Troy and McClain.]

Another thought if Spiller is gone is Javid Best from Cal. He’s got those multiple skills that make him an immediate impact player.

by Stillerz Damo on Jan 27, 2010 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Quality over quantity

Sorry, to clarify above post:

I fully expect Steelers to retain Hampton, Clark and Colon for 2010. Hence, the “new NT and S” from this draft will not be expected to start immediately or replace Big Snack or the big hitter … Hood can probably play NT, so they could also draft DE for depth (DL is old and 1 of those guys will always be hurt).

Like I said before, I would encourage Steelers to bring quality over quantity in the ’10 draft. They found the quantity last year, with Hood, Wallace, Lewis, Burnett, Urbik (we hope) and Johnson all expected to be on the 53 man roster in 2010. And Foster as UFA.

Trade 3,4,5 picks if necessary to find 2-3 true stud playas in the first ~60-75 picks. Get “difference makers” …. This strategy worked with both Polamalu and Santonio when they traded up to scoop best player at that position.

by Watty4ever on Jan 27, 2010 5:34 PM EST reply actions  

Prepare to be disappointed
I fully expect Steelers to retain Hampton, Clark and Colon for 2010.

You haven’t been paying attention to how the Steelers work. They rarely sign any of their own UFAs, much less all of them. Colon is an RFA, but we will be lucky to keep either Hampton or Clark. Clark is more likely due to a lower price tag, but even so, I’d make it 50/50 at best.

by Steelin on Jan 27, 2010 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

UFA's?

I haven’t been paying attention? This uncapped year will be different from years past. But what’s not different is that Steelers don’t have any capable replacement on the roster for Hampton, Clark or Colon, which means they ain’t goin’ anywhere. The Steelers love Colon, even more than Starks (right or wrong) and he’s a 4-yr player (not 6) so he’s not UFA, they can tag him with 1stRd tender, which they’ll do … if they don’t sign him long-term. Will then place tag on either Clark or Hampton (or both) if they can’t reach contract terms. My guess is that Hampton is more likely to play under tag in 2010 for ~$6MM (replaced by Hood or other in 2011), whereas Clark more likely to sign 2/3 year contract. Check back with me in late March and we’ll see who’s right.

by Watty4ever on Jan 28, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

With this draft I would like to see us trade down and pick up some extra picks. We trade back to the 26th or 27th spot, which are the Cardinals and Cowboys picks respectively. For this trade we give up our 1st, 4th, and 5th or 6th, and get their 1st and 2nd.

With the 26th or 27th we have numerous options availabe. I think Cody will begin to slip and will be available at the end of the 1st, Williams I also believe will be available around this area. This pick puts us ahead of the Chargers who could be looking for NT help, but believe they will be targeting a RB. The other team who could be in the NT market is Dallas. However they also need OL help so I believe they take a OT. Lets say we don’t resign Hampton. We draft Williams or Cody at 27, believe one will be there, instead of at 18 saving us a decent amount of money. If Hampton does sign, and there are reports it is a priority http://blogs.nfl.com/2010/01/27/steelers-expected-to-re-sign-dt-hampton-s-clark/, we draft Iupati to be our Faneca for years to come. Iupati is going to be a special player and sounds like he is having a great Senior Bowl.

With our second round picks we target our safety and get some LB depth. I say with our first second rounder we select Chad Jones or Nate Allen. With our other pick we get our LB depth. Being an Gamecock fan, we target Eric Norwood. This kid is going to be a fericious pass rusher in the 3-4. He reminds me of Harrison and can learn under him for a couple years. If he isn’t there we find Farrior’s replacement, possibly Spikes but don’t see him lasting that long. I would like to see Daryl Washington drafted with that pick.

Our third round pick depends on what happens in the first. If we draft a NT, I say we go after Vladimir Ducasse our of UMass, Michael Petrus from Arkansas, or Kyle Calloway from Iowa. If we go OL then we look for our NT, Cam Thomas UNC, or we could stay on OL and get some depth. We could also look for a CB here, Perrish Cox, Amari Spievey, Kyle Wilson. Another option would be Dexter McCluster to be our burner behind Mendy and return punts.

6th and 7th round picks are a toss up. Looking for a center to groom wouldn’t be a bad idea nor would finding a project DL. It would be good that whoever is drafted there could come in and contribute on Special Teams.

Bringing the Wood!

by redmik on Jan 27, 2010 9:00 PM EST reply actions  

The Pressing Need is a replacement for JAMES FARRIOR

 Not sure what every body else is looking at but I saw a need to find a quicker MLB to replace Farrior the most glaring need going in to the offseason…J.F. was torched quite a bit last year and it will continue this comin year as well unless we get a draft pick to replace him in the next 2 years in the meantime the Steelers should groom K.Fox to step in and play along side Timmons n 2010..I love J.F. but he has lost a step, maybe 2 and its not his fault, age has caught up to him……in other news

the other cornerback position will be filled with either Burnett or Lewis next year and T.P. will be back from injury, Gay will move to the nickel slot to play alongside Deshea and everything will b ok wit the secondary…in terms of the d-line, it’s not as dyer as it looks…Hood will play more next year, Keisel has a lot left in the tank, Casey should get another 3 year deal and I’m sure we’ll draft a d-lineman or 2 that can play 10 or 15 snaps a game as a rookie and then at some point n the next year or 2 start full time

…the offense side of the ball is all set as far as I’m concerned, getting a new o.line coach was my concerned and we got that, WE WILL DEF. BLOCK BETTER AND RUN THE BALL BETTER next year, I’m willing to bet on that..the key offensively for Pitt is to find a way to utilize S.Logan on some offensive plays and run the ball better on short yardage—and that’s up to Tomlin and Arians to figure that out, that is a MUST

I’M OUT…GO PIRATES! 90 WINS THIS YEAR…..i hope:_)

by JokerPace on Jan 27, 2010 9:58 PM EST reply actions  

I agree about Farrior. I hope they take a close look at Micah Johnson from Kentucky. They should be able to get him in the 3rd round.

I dont know about Logan getting offensive snaps… he looked more like a deer in headlights most of the year. Is an offensive line coach really going to make Max “Donuts in his pockets” Starks block any better at this point in his career?? I guess Coach Kugler could help Willie Colon who really just needs the bad attitude and lack of focus slapped out of his head along with that nasty hairdo…

I guess we’ll hope for the best though!

by Stillerz Damo on Jan 28, 2010 8:54 AM EST up reply actions  

draft BPA

at 18 the best c/b, s, and ilb will be gone! dont need qb or wr! i think steelers have colon where they want him being 4 yr guy and wil resign him or pay minumums! also have casy big snack hampton where they want him if they choose to place tag on him! in my opinion our biggest need is at ilb for farrior and saftey depth! in the nfl never turn down a good cornerback! at 18 i like the next alan faneca g iupati from idaho. also like kyle wilson c/b boise st. would give defense another play maker that is much needed in our secondary! rest of our d is solid and has been for long time but secondary has been suspect every year except 2008 they played awesome! no picks says it all except troy and 1 by old man desha townsend in last game! thats not good enough! young guys at corner will be better next year. ilb johnson looks good to me in 3rd round………..bsteel

by bsteel on Jan 28, 2010 8:25 PM EST reply actions  

Interesting thoughts

but it would be easier to read if you broke it up into paragraphs and used periods rather than exclamation points. Alot of us here read a lot and run-on paragraphs like that make it hard to figure what you’re trying to say. I’m not busting on you, just trying to help.

Since you seem to have some good stuff to share maybe it would help to make it easier for others to read?

by tobiathan on Jan 28, 2010 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't draft a Cornerback

I totally agree that a 1st Round pick at Cornerback would not benefit the Steelers in the 2010 season. As everyone has mentioned there are far too many options. Especially with a healthy #43. I also agree that attention needs to be given to the Inside LB position. Farrior has been both a leader and a warrior for the Steelers, but it’s time to find his replalcement and it needs to be this year. I know Spikes (Florida) has had some issues, but he would be a steel at 18. Keyaron Fox has also demonstrated that he is a player.

If we could manage or manipulate a way to draft CJ Spiller, it would be a move comparable to 2003 when we moved up and got Troy. But I don’t think he would be there at 18, nor would the organization sacrafice draft picks to get another back at this point in time. Willie Parker will still be available. It’s still a nice dream!

Here is what I think; If we draft three to five players that are on the roster and contributing/starting over the next three to four years. This will be a successful draft. If a Pro Bowler or two emerges at any position It will not be unexpected! PITTSBURGH 2010!!!!!!! …..steelers4ya

by TAJ 5 on Jan 30, 2010 5:41 AM EST reply actions  

We Need

2 years ago Arron Smith got injured our record went down the tubes, this year Arron Smith got hurt plus Palamalu our record went down the tubes.

What e need to do is simply get a player who can be an impact player not just fill a spot on the field. If we can get a cornerback who can intercept because our current guys can’t. Or a lineman who is a run stuffing demanding double team attention guy, or a beast at inside linebacker than that is what we go with.

Our problems appear to be Timmons missed to many tackles, Farrior has lost a step and is just missing some of those key tackles he got in previous years by a step, and non of our cornerbacks intercepted the ball more than once even when they had opportunities.

Guys who create turnovers or make other teams have to make special plans for you are impact players and I feel a middle linebacker who can blitz and flatten backs in their tracks plus cover tight ends is alot to ask but if one is available lets get him.

by Joseph y on Jan 30, 2010 5:50 PM EST reply actions  

OT or NT for 1st round

Some draft pundits have the Steelers taking an OT or NT with their first round pick. It definitely should be the way to go…

http://www.theklowntimes.net

by sburks1906 on Jan 31, 2010 4:36 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Your all time Steeler regret?
5467103_small
Hines Ward: a different look part 1. Hines vs. the big boys.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Isaac Redman 2012: Should we temper our expectations?
Photo_small
Worry Warts
6-trophies_small
The Saint Will Be The Starter for 2012 - The Whole Season.
Trophies_small
Why Is Rashard Mendenhall Still On This Roster?
2009-week6_1440x900_benroethlisberger_small
Pads - To wear or not to wear
Small
53 Man Roster (Way too early edition)
Small
WHEN DO TICKETS GO ON SALE?
Small
Submitted for your approval: Steeler names for this year's pledge class
Small
The biggest offseason ever

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo