Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Rankings - BlogPoll Top 25

Open Letter to Bruce Arians


Dear Bruce:

Congratulations on receiving confirmation that your contract through the 2010 season will be honored. As one in the minority who has defended you throughout Steeler Nation, I believe you deserved that vote of confidence.

  Arians_medium

In case you haven't noticed, you do not have good chemistry with Steeler Nation. You probably don't care, but I'll tell you why anyway. Simply put, you are not a subscriber to Steeler Football, which has been a badge of honor in the Nation for as long as I can remember, the early '60s. Steeler Football traditionally has been John Henry Johnson breaking someone's jaw with a run or a block; Chuck Noll insisting that we "impose our will" on anyone standing in our way; Merril Hoge pounding his soul on Three Rivers carpet; guys like Barry Foster, Bam Morris and the marquis poster boy of Steeler Football, Jerome Bettis. People in Pittsburgh who work hard and eat lunch from a pail, people who would trade a $100 bottle of Dom Perignon straight up for a six-pack of Iron City, people who cannot help to fall in love with a guy named "the Bus," just have a hard time relating to your wide-open, often lunatic style.  You are a wine cooler in a case of Rolling Rock.

Star-divide

But that's OK.  In fact, in some ways, it is we who are a bit behind the times while you are trying to forge to the cutting edge.  I just looked up the NFL's team rushing yards for 2009.  I noticed that San Diego and Indianapolis, the two teams with the bye in the AFC, are ranked #31 and #32, the absolute bottom of the barrell, in both rushing yards and yards per attempt.  That cannot be random coincidence.  The NFL is constantly changing and those who don't change with it are left behind.

The bottom line is that every single skill position player in your offense had the best year of his career, and that alone merits you another year as our offensive coordinator.  Our quarterback was among the elite in the league with a 100 passer rating and became the first Steeler to ever shatter the 4,000-yard passing mark.  Hines was vintage Hines, and Tone not only crossed the 1,000-yard mark for the first time, he tacked on another 250.  Heath Miller also had the best year of his career, by far, and how you emerged both Rashard Mendenhall and Mike Wallace has really excited the entire Nation.  Yes, you do things that annoy us, and I'll get to those soon, but firing you now would be a classic case of throwing the baby out with the bath water, or throwing Angelina Jolie out of bed for eating crackers.

The truth is, and the Nation may find it hard to swallow, but you were not the reason we didn't make the playoffs this year.  The Steelers won the Super Bowl in 2008 with 1,000 fewer yards and 21 fewer points than you racked up in 2009.  The reasons we are sitting home right now are because we could not tackle kick returners and our defense made some alarming nosedives in many categories, namely third-down conversions and fourth-quarter collapses, but I digress. That's a subject for another day and a letter to another coach.

Back to eating crackers in bed, I have four requests that I implore you to consider.  While you are ahead of the power curve in many ways and truly represent modern NFL football, I humbly submit the following suggestions:

1)  On third down or fourth down, with one or two yards to gain, we must run the football.  When we bring in that empty set and the defense knows we're passing, four things can happen and three of them are bad.  An interception is the worst, a sack is almost as bad, and even an imcompletion means we have to either punt or turn the ball over.  Rashard is a big boy.  Give him the football.  If we can't gain a stinking yard we don't deserve to win, but my guess is we will.

2)  Give the defense a break.  Slinging it too much, even when it works and especially when it doesn't, keeps putting the defense back on the field.  They are a proud but aging unit that needs a 10-minute break now and then.  Use some clock.  Mix in some screen passes.  Mendy might be great with those.  Who knows, by the fourth quarter maybe our defense might not be so tired and might not keep collapsing.  Tone and Hines and young Wallace won't mind.  Ask them if they would rather have another Lombardi or better statistics?  They'll give you the right answer.

3)  We play in the AFC North.  We have no domes.  The weather is often bad, the wind is often blowing, precipitation is often falling and the field is often a mess.  Take note of that.  Design your game plan around an offense that can least be affected by the elements.  We have to run the ball when we have to run the ball, if that makes sense.  Make sure both your personnel and game plan are prepared to do that. 

4)  Ben cannot be sacked another 50 times.  He is a walking time bomb ready to implode on any play.  There are a hundred million reasons why he needs to be protected.  Ever notice how Peyton's jersey doesn't need washed after playing in a mud bowl?  We need to treat our guy with the same respect.  Yes, he needs to make plays, and yes, part of his total effectiveness is improvising and making plays.  We need to allow for some of that, but not to the extent we currently allow.  You can't give a BB gun to your son and then let him run wild in the back yard without giving him some restrictions.  We need organized mayhem, if you'll pardon the oxymoron.  There's a fine line between letting Ben be Ben and letting Ben be General Custer.  Find it.

If you do these four things correctly, I believe the statistics you post will have greater meaning.  Instead of being the seventh ranked offense but 12th in scoring, indicating more yards and fewer points, we might increase our scoring output to match the yardage gained.  We might also improve our 21-ranking in red zone touchdown efficiency.  We will also help our defense so that together we can all eat.

Again, congratulations on wearing the black and gold another year.   I believe you deserve a chance to mesh your offensive prowess with the above governors to form a beautiful balance of creativity and methodical football.  I am also looking forward to a fresh offensive line coach who can help you do such.  Assuming you are big enough to listen to the above suggestions, you have my loyal support.

Sincerely,

Maryrose

10 recs  |  Comment 183 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Put that letter in an envelope and mail it to BA immediately.

I’ll buy the stamp.

If he does those 4 things next year, I don’t see anyone stopping our offense. If he does those 4 things, I’ll get back on his side. For now, I’m still not a BA fan.

by theatrain on Jan 6, 2010 8:23 PM EST reply actions  

But he will not because he thinks that HIS offense can work in terrible weather even though this year proved him wrong

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: DIck Lebeau, Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Chris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"If you give Arians a fullback, he won’t use one. Instead, he insists on using Matt Spaeth, who probably doesn’t cast a shadow because it would require blocking sunlight." stellin with some very true words

by WVPiratesfan on Jan 6, 2010 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t be surprised. He and Tomlin had a very long talk today. Also, we had only one bad-weather loss this year and two bad-weather wins. You might be pleasantly surprised next season.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Jan 6, 2010 8:32 PM EST reply actions  

Well Done

You made you case very well for what everyone wants anyways…a solid “team.” I figured he probably is being given a chance to make adjustments…fair is fair.

By the way, loved the

Back to eating crackers in bed,

by Twell on Jan 6, 2010 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

This is nit-picking, but I'd consider the loss to the Bears a bad-weather loss

Lousy offensive production in that one too, with Reed missing at least one due to slipping.

Still, I hope he is smart enough, and egoless enough, to change for the better. Your 4 suggestions are a good start.

by MelBlunt on Jan 6, 2010 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Amen, MR...amen

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 6, 2010 8:46 PM EST reply actions  

Give it a rest

Steeler football is whatever the men in black and gold are out there doing. We weren’t running the ball last year either. The offense wasn’t the problem this year. While I agree that there were some bad calls, none of them really cost us games. The only person I place any blame on for the way the season turned out is Mike Tomlin. He was too stubborn to realize that the people he was putting out on the field weren’t adequate enough to get the job done. Week in and week out he watched William Gay get embarassed but he didn’t even light a fire under him. He started Deshea Townsend? Was that supposed to scare anyone’s offense? Hopefully we can address those problem through FA and the draft so we can get back to loving everything about the Steelers

by lilbomberx on Jan 6, 2010 8:48 PM EST reply actions  

Disagree

I do not believe Tomlin is the stubborn type. I think bringing Anthony Madison back is proof to that. Also, Gay showed promise last year and all thoughts were that he’d step it up this year, but it didn’t pan out. Burnett is too young so Townsend was pretty much all we had left to work with. I’m sure they’ll go after the position in the draft, because we can’t have that much of a dropoff when one guy is missing…ie Troy.

Bad Andy, Good Pizza.

by count'em_six on Jan 7, 2010 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Who was he suppose to put out there?

You pick the guy. lol Exactly he had choices between Townsend, Gay, Burnett. Yea, thought so.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Please

Tomlin put Gay out there because was the best option. When Gay struggled, he put Townsend out there becuase he was our next best option. Our other options were an untested rookie (who when tested, didn’t perform too well either), and a vet who would end up being released.

Good CB’s don’t grow on trees, and there aren’t too many available via free agency during the season. Tomlin made the most of the talent available on the roster.

breathe in deep feel your heart beat, just to know that life's worth livin'. feel your feet on the earth, better love it while it's still here spinnin'.

by NoCal-SteelCity on Jan 8, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, I don`t like Arians but...

It has nothing to do with Steelers football, history or tradition.

The reason I want to throw Angelina Jolie out of bed is for more than eating crackers, it is for not closing the deal ones we are in bed.

In other words SCORING POINTS.

We are great at moving the ball and we have great stats, but 12th in scoring offence and 21-ranking in red zone touchdown efficiency, Tampa Bay was better in red zone.

Of the 5 QB who had 100 or better passer rating their offense had the number 1,2,4,3 and 12 scoring offense. Guess who was number 12?

I just don`t see him as a great situational OC, he chokes on third and short, in the red zone or when we need to hold the ball to preserve a lead. So unless this are crackers throw him out of bed.

For all other moments he is great to have in bed.

by mikemex on Jan 6, 2010 9:03 PM EST reply actions  

I agree with your assessment, but..

The O-line has failed in those spote before…remember in 2008, how many times we got stopped in 3rd and 4th and short?

by nycsteelerfan on Jan 6, 2010 9:47 PM EST up reply actions  

NYC, you have to quit blaming everything on the line...

they are not going anywhere. At most, it would take 3-5 seasons to completely overhaul the line. The coaches needs to learn to make the most out of what they have, even if it means making chicken salad out of chicken poop.

Just like everyone who defends BA, they are the same line that won a SB and helped the O set all of those personal records. They can’t be that bad, right?

by mactastic07 on Jan 7, 2010 8:56 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought the line

played quite well this year. By no means elite, but easily in the top half of the league.

by TheCincinnatiConqueror on Jan 7, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

1000 more yards but only 21 more points

This means we gained a lot of meaningless yards (i.e. ate a lot of crackers), but couldn’t close the deal. Angelina would have thrown us out of bed.

by whogastim on Jan 7, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think Angelina would let most of us in bed

breathe in deep feel your heart beat, just to know that life's worth livin'. feel your feet on the earth, better love it while it's still here spinnin'.

by NoCal-SteelCity on Jan 8, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Have to Vent...

I have never posted here before but I have to vent. Although I agree with the things he needs to change above, I don’t believe Arians can or wants to change, so he does not deserve another chance. His continued service as the Steelers offensive coordinator will waste another year of what could be a truly great offense and another Super Bowl contender. I read Ron Cook in the Post Gazette who agrees Arians should not be fired and says Arians should not be the scapegoat. If anyone is now being offered as a scapegoat, it is Larry Zierlein. Although I agree the offensive line needs a lot of work and Zierlein needs to fired, it is obvious he is being cast out as the sacrificial lamb. Most of the problems with protection and inability to run block have to do with the Xs and Os. And it isn’t about Arians not playing Steeler football, pounding the ball, exerting our will, etc., etc…(although I did like the comparison to a wine cooler rather than a fine wine which he wants to be). Bruce Arians should be fired because he is a bad offensive coordinator. Too many analysts, fans, and apparently Tomlin, are blinded by the statistics the Steelers put up this year. How about the only statistics that count – seven losses means we didn’t get in the playoffs, and it was due in large part to an inconsistent offense that was too often deficient in the offensive statistic that really counts – scoring touchdowns. And the offense did cost us games – just look at the Cleveland game in particular and the others we lost by a field goal, but should have scored touchdowns earlier in wasted trips to the red zone, or were put out of field goal range because of sacks in the open set, or failed to move the ball against sub-par defenses, or failed to even attempt to use Dixon’s running ability at Baltimore, etc., etc., etc., all attributable to Bruce Arians’ offense. Does anyone really care right now that our QB, receivers and running back put up good individual numbers this year. With the offensive weapons that are on this team, this should be one of the greatest offenses in football, in which case the individual statistics would take care of themselves by the way. Instead the Steelers offense routinely under-performed and was agonizingly inconsistent. This is in large part to due to Arians’ terrible schemes, inability and lack of desire to scheme the run at all, atrocious play calling, lack of ingenuity, lack of balance, lack of surprise, inability to adapt to what the other team does defensively, inability to recognize even his own players strengths and weaknesses, and absolutely stubborn devotion to the open set that results in failed third downs and our QB being destroyed when there is nobody there to pick up the blitz. As most of the readers here, I could go on and on about examples of Arians’ absolutely stupid play calling that resulted in drives ending too quickly, Steelers coming away with no points, and defense going back on the field too soon. On a related point, Arians’ (and therefore Tomlin’s) devotion to passing has negatively impacted our defensive production because they get back on the field way too soon, which makes it much more difficult to maintain their high-energy aggressiveness for 60 minutes – note the big problems with closing out games in the 4th quarter this year. We don’t have to run the ball more often then we pass, but we do have to be able to run the ball to close out games, to score from inside the five, to make short yardage first downs without having to rely on our big QB, to keep the other team guessing, and to set up our very effective play action passing game. And has anyone else noticed that this offense typically does quite good when the team has a long week or bye-week to prepare, suffers more after a regular 7-day week of preparation, and is generally very bad after a short week? I just don’t think Arians can put it together unless he has extra time. And when preparing to play bad teams, he must have been AWOL entirely. I have been a Tomlin fan but if he does keep Arians for another wasted year, I am not sure how long I can continue to watch it. And please don’t bring up the Super Bowl last year because except for the last drive the offense had little to do with the victory or even getting to the playoffs. I can only stress out and yell at the television so many times before I just decide to go fishing instead. If Arians was such a great offensive coordinator, we would be running up the score on bad defenses and I could get a break now and then. Without going into all of the problems on defense, I will simply state my opinion that the defensive problems are with personnel rather than coaching. The Steelers need to fix their defensive problems with better and younger players. They need to fix their offensive (and special teams) problems with better coaching. Tomlin promised big changes but like before I fear that is all talk.

by Steeler Army on Jan 6, 2010 9:30 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Would it have killed you ...

to put in a few line breaks? I saw that block of prose above, sighed, and moved on to the next item.

by Citizen of Steeler Nation on Jan 6, 2010 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Shame

You missed a well thought out, coherent diatribe.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 8:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Read it

The real question is how much of our offensive production was a result of the scheme and how much was the raw talent of the players? None of us have an answer for that. But we have witnessed some curious formations during situational play. I’m not talking about odd-ball plays, like the long pass from Tone. There’s a place for that. I’m talking about repeated use of formations in the same situations where they have failed in previous games. The empty backfield seems to be the poster child for that.

Twas a good read. But first I had to cut n paste it into another text editor and add paragraph breaks wherever a sentence started with the word “and”.

by Varmint on Jan 7, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Way to improvise

wouldn’t want you to miss anything!

Yes, the empty set. My head exploded just thinking about it. Next time you see Count’em_six on here, ask him how many times I screamed at the TV this season when they went to the empty set .. .. .. “HERE COMES THE SACK!!” Sorry to scream at you all.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 12:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like my house.

Empty back sets = much yelling and screaming.

by dawgs144 on Jan 7, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, and you broke my ceiling fan

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 3:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Dude, it was hilarious actually

Newly remodeled living room. A couple bros over to watch the game. Excitement ensues after a TD or something accompanied by high fives and BLAM, cracked ceiling fan.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Followed shortly thereafter

by spilled beer. Good times.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Sounds like if we all get together for that game

I am going to have to “bring it” to the tailgate. Might revert to my college days.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, practice up.

Of course, I haven’t really let go of my college days and that was 15 years ago.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Hahaha

I’ve only been out for a year. So I am not too far removed.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 4:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Sweet

So you can learn us a thing or two about the “new ways”

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure

There is much new. Just drink and drink some more.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

I always pass up comments when they don’t use paragraphs. It makes it a lot easier to read.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

He said he don't post here often

give him a break, read it -he makes a very good point.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I read it,a ctually after reading chewie's comment

He is just saying exactly what you all said to me in that other thread that I disagree with. I just don’t want to rehash the argument.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

very true. lol

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

Great points.

Even without any line breaks I still read your long paragraph of venting and you list all the reasons Arians should be fired.

by Jett on Jan 6, 2010 11:21 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

i thought i agreed w/ the original post until i heard this response… yep, you summed up my frustrations entirely.

by PTownSteelTown on Jan 7, 2010 12:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree whole heartedly

The only reason BA should be invited back is if the man changes. But why would he change now if he hasn’t before? If he didn’t care enough to change and got fired in Cleveland; why would he here? What MR has requested has been obvious and shouldn’t have had to be mentioned with a good OC.

The problem though with BA is not simply abandonment to the running game. In my opinion he sabotages the running game with his scheme and with his play design. When he runs its predictable sets and and shifts to boot that tells the defense not only that they are running but also where they are running. So when they do run they may only get 1 or 2 yards which makes it seem well we just aren’t a good running team. If he were to go to a FB I believe that would change completely and we all know Mendenhall best runs have been with a pulling guard and not TE/WR shifts.

Then its the crazy play calling, in my opinion you are who you are and you can’t teach an old dog new tricks. As much as BA my try to change he will eventually go back to his roots and what he thinks he knows. Last time I checked they don’t give points for yards so how does increase in production of yards warrant you a pass? When he has a significant increase in production of scoring then I’ll keep him.

Everyone loves to dump on the defense. Which they deserve but the offense does them no favors. All of a sudden we can’t score/move the ball in the fourth quarter – why because by then BA hasn’t adapted to what the defense has changed at halftime and the defense has figured out what BA is trying to do. So then we have FGs and three and outs in the second half which gives the other team momentum and tires the defense out. Its not just about TOP its about when you are possessing the ball. I can lead the game in TOP at half but if I only produce 10 points then that is a failure. I can have the most yards in a game but if I still lose it then it is a failure.

If you look at it in that scope then the offense has failed us and if more FG were TDs this year we’d know we’d have a sorry defense but we’d also know we’d be playing this weekend. How do the Colts and Patriots win Super Bowls? They don’t have dominating defenses. I think it reflects poorly on our offense that we have to have a dominating defense to win games. San Diego, Indy, Pats, heck even the Saints and Cards aren’t in the playoffs because of dominating defenses. They are in the playoffs because more times than not their offense will put a TD on the board instead of a FG. We are so stuck in this, we have to have a dominating defense, mood that we can’t get the big picture. The expectations do not change so even if the defense isn’t having a historical year, like last year, we should still at least get to the playoffs. Our defense shouldn’t HAVE to be the best in the league for us to win. Does it help? Sure, but that is the point of having 4 1st round picks on offense in the last 6 years. If Arians can turn those yards into points then he’ll be straight with me but until he does he needs to go.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

I totally agree with the post —

I would gladly give up some of these points, yards and completions and return to PHYSICALLY PUNISHING opposing teams with Steelers football — tough, hard inside running.

We have great talent in the passing game, I think everybody can see that.

It’s time to go back to beating other teams up, setting our defense up better, and owning the 4th quarter!!

by Febi on Jan 7, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Easier said than done

PS- Welcome to BTSC, do stick around.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

thank you, I love this site

getting back to physical football starts with 1. patience and 2. commitment,

not always in that order.

by Febi on Jan 7, 2010 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

FU Panda!!

HA! Only joking. I actually bought a book called FU Panda as a gift for Christmas! It’s a HOOT!

Welcome to the site. Good stuff here. Sometimes you have to have a thick skin but overall, fantastic info, links and insight.

Enjoy

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't read past the first 2 sentences.

1. Brevity is the soul of wit.
2. Run on paragraphs give me a headache.

I wasn’t pleased because we didn’t win - Mike Tomlin (after the 2009 week 2 loss to Chicago).

by fanofsteel on Jan 8, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions  

the 31 and 32 ranked run games of San Diego and Indy each have at least 6 more rushing touchdowns than us (17 and 16 respectively, I believe.) Not to mention that both San Diego and indy run more short passing routes that are timed and precise — they act as a substitute for the running game. High % passes that have good men in the open field

by klompus on Jan 6, 2010 9:34 PM EST reply actions  

well put

Bruce’s ego is too big to allow our offense scoring success like Pats Chargers or Colts. This is Tomlin’s biggest mistake, keeping him. And I fear it will set us back AND send our franchise QB into early retirement. Sure the OL coach needed to go too but Bruce has that stupid philosophy that an unblocked blitzer means an open reciever. Helllllllo you idiot, an unblocked blitzer means a QB getting HIT HARD. Ugh he’s stupid….

by Prok on Jan 6, 2010 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

He believes

that Ben can break any tackle so why do you need a blocker?

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Ha love it

Great letter MR.

Totally on board with you.

I would add half an item. I think a big part of BA’s problem is that he telegraphs his play calling. As you point out, when you put together an empty backfield on 3rd and short to medium you do not leave the defense guessing. Once they don’t have to guess, their life becomes a whole lot easier.

I feel that has been the case in much of BA’s play calling. He does run the ball. He just does not use the run to set up the pass or the pass to set up the run. There seems to be little or no misdirection to his play calling apart from the occasional reverse.

by SteelerBuddha on Jan 6, 2010 9:36 PM EST reply actions  

Thumbs up, arms crossed, wait and see attitude.

Spot on Maryrose. Thank you.

I am not convinced that BA is the entire future of the New Offensive Era. I think he’s good enough for the transition. And that’s the operative word for me: “transition”. As soon as Ben started using the words “pass” and “different” in his interviews, it became apparent to me that this season was going to be wobbly. I knew we were in for a transition season and expected that we wouldn’t go far into the playoffs. Of course, I didn’t think that our D was going to suck shit to the tune of a 5 game, Barnum and Bailey losing streak. I honestly figured that this year was going to be about establishing a new energy, and that we were going to sacrifice wins and a Superbowl. I was surprised at the 6 and 2 start.

I would sincerely start vomiting on myself if I had to go through another 5 years of 3 yards at a time offense, killer D, and the Steelers possibly winning in the last 15 seconds because Ben went apeshit with the out-of-the-pocket, whoopsy-daisy 2 minute drill, and then Jeff Reed possibly winning it with a Field Goal. It might have worked for one Magic Ring, but with the way the league is evolving, there’s no way that formula would being future results.

If the difference between the old way, and a new era of Steelers O, is one or two circus seasons, I’ll take it.

I could give a shit less who’s drawing the X’s and O’s. Tomlin will work that out. I’m 100% sure of it. For me it all comes down to Tomlin. Do you believe in him or not? That’s what all of this shit boils down to. It’s like someone reading the Lord of the Rings for the first time. You either believe that Frodo is going to take the ring to Mordor and stuff it down Sauron’s throat, or you don’t. The “I’m not sure what’s going to happen” crowd fits into the latter catagory.

In my world, Tomlin stuffs the Ring down Sauron’s throat and we live happily ever after.

by Miyanovich on Jan 6, 2010 10:14 PM EST reply actions  

Gollum wants another ringsy!

"Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank

Xbox Live Gamertag- Alf Ardanyu

by SoCalSteelerFan on Jan 7, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

PRECIOUS!!!!

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey!

The unauthorized use of MY PHOTO on Behind the Steel Curtain is strictly prohibited!!

by TheHumbleOne on Jan 8, 2010 2:55 AM EST up reply actions  

and another thing

Any other Steelers fan here think the ONLY way our offense and Ben looked fluid was in the no-huddle ?? I was begging for that style of attack plenty of times this year. But noooooo, we hadda watch our O disappear for long stretches at a time. Sure Tomlin, let’s put it all on the OL coach…

by Prok on Jan 6, 2010 10:25 PM EST reply actions  

Can't use it all the time

the reason why that works its because its a change of pace, the defense don’t prepare for it, you run it full time defense have to prepare for it and it won’t be as successful.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:24 AM EST up reply actions  

There's More To Winning...

Than putting up fancy stats. The playcalling is predictable. I could predict it accurately at least 80% of the time sitting at home on my fat butt. Imagine how often a NFL Defensive Coordinator can.

I don’t care that this offense is becoming pass oriented. Hell, I like it. But the playcalling is telegraphing pass every time. There’s no play action. You didn’t set up the run for the pass or pass for the run. There’s no strategy. Just throwing it. That’s my problem with BA.

by docsteeler on Jan 6, 2010 10:37 PM EST reply actions  

I'd love to sit down and watch a game with you

If you can call exactly what play and route the receiver is going to take you are a genius of some sort. Any person can sit there and say “pass” or “run”, but that doesn’t mean you are predicting the play call. Unless, you are sitting there saying “pitch right”, “inside slant”, “deep pattern to Wallace”, “end-around”, etc. you are not really predicting the play.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I did

Its really quite easy. Just follow the TE or WR you’ll get it right where they are running about 90% of the time. Its like that movie The express where ernie davis says to the coach, “You mean you don’t want me to run where the guy is shifting to?” And the coach replies, “No, the defense is going that way you run the other opposite way where the defense used to be”
Or something to the effect i’ll get the exact quote. Great movie btw. I recommend it.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

A good running game should be able to run even when the other team knows it is coming. That is what Cowher did, especially in the 4th quarter. Anyway, I’ll sit down with the both of you, and if you can call pitch right or left, up the right/left side of the line, end-around, play-action, delay run, etc correctly 80% of the game I will give you each $20.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 9:32 AM EST up reply actions  

You are in baltimore right?

We’re trying to go to a game but next year might be the year we’re going to Pittsburgh. I’ll keep you posted, I proved it to my dad last night when we watch the film together. There were several times BA did it back to back, shift TE to the right, run to the right, shift WR to the right, run to the right. I saw it in real time and he records each game so I had to point it out to him while he was re-watching it to get him to understand.

While I agree a good Power running game should be able to run even when the other team knows its coming but our line isn’t that good yet so why put it on them when they aren’t ready?

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Let me know what game you are going to

I am trying to go to my first game in Heinz next year. Maybe around midseason and preferably over a division rival.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

You need to hook up with

Me, Chewy and Andy next year!

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm in

We should plan something once the schedules come out.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Counting down the days!

Usually don’t like to see division rivals because traditionally they have sucked or the tix are harder to come by. But, Cincinatti and Baltimore will be intriguing match ups again next year.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Well we can do whatever

I just want to get to a game in Pittsburgh for the first time of my life.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

It's awesome bro!

I’m hoping LeBeau stays so I have two contacts for tickets. When the schedule comes out make sure to hit me up if and of you see it come out first. Also you need to hit Chewy up on how he gets the tickets sometime in May.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Ok, we should all try to get to the same one

Have a tailgate and a damn good time

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

You will never be the same again

Try getting to training camp this year too. Fun experience. I may miss out this year but only because my wife is due right around the time camp starts. Don’t know that it is a good idea to skip town when she may burst at any moment. Perhaps you can attend as my proxy?

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Congrats on the baby

Isn’t the majority of camp during the week though? Only chance I would have is to get up there for the weekend. I might have to try to do that. Do they serve beer there?

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks! - camp is all week long

I usually attend the first Saturday which is the last weekend in July/1st weekend of August. No beer there unfortunately. I make a weekend trip out of it and get plenty of beer time in around practice.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Congrats again on the little one!

If you go up for camp…either of you…let me know. I’ll probably go up for a day or two.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks man

In true die hard fashion, I am still scheming to see if there is any way I can get out there for camp. Due date is 8/16 so, I may just be able to squeak out there before then.

Looking at the calenday, my guess is that the team will report to Latrobe the week of July 26th. If that is the case, I am going to try and head out the weekend of Saturday, July 31. I need to get some baby Steelers gear including a new TT to swaddle the child in the delivery room!

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

*calendar

duh

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll pony up on the TT

I wonder if they have some small Steeler beanies….gotta keer the head warm.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Dig it!!

If not, they will have them out in Station Square for sure. I’m such a wacko, that I have to purchase all of my Steelers gear from the Pittsburgh/Western Pa area. I feel like it makes the gear luckier or something.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I get mine from

Robinson Town Center

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Dunno where that is

will have to check it out next time I’m out there.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Righteous

Ok, well I am terrible at planning this far in advance. I’ll start looking at dates in march and then I will let you know. Then maybe the three of can plan to meet up and catch a session together.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 1:05 PM EST up reply actions  

sounds like a plan

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't worry

my wheels are spinning already. Provided you are still around the site come camp time, we will work something out. My bro, Count’em_six will probably go with me this year too.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Awesome. Can’t wait.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea I'm done missing out

on training camp for a bunch of whiney baseball players. I’ll never forget golfing all morning at Glengarry and barely keeping my eyes open at camp afterwards because I was so tuned up. I can’t even count how many times I almost fell off the bleacher…people must have thought I was a bum. Would be sweet to meet up with everyone….hit up Sharkey’s afterwards….

Bad Andy, Good Pizza.

by count'em_six on Jan 8, 2010 10:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I would love to see a game

I have been a Steeler fan since I can remember. I am stuck in Indiana tho so all I get on t.v. is the Colts. I will make it to Heinz field someday.

by hsrdad30 on Jan 12, 2010 9:55 AM EST up reply actions  

nice work m....ditto doc above

 our offense must now be what our defense was in the seventies,,, ben must be the icon joe green,,,,,we must in todays game build to be able to outscore anyone ,just like the curtain was built to shut down anyone….
 troy is terry to complete the reversal…..
if we can’t accept this we may as well trade ben for a center with no teeth that can run block, and a defensive end that eats studebaker parts.
that may be my secret fantasy, but its not my rational thought for todays game,especially since we’ve alrady come so far on the ben route.
scarey push the envelope thought,,,,,,, we love our recievers but …………..maybe we need a reciever who can get open on the first or second cut, and not only after a ben pump fake and scramble.

by steelswine on Jan 6, 2010 10:41 PM EST reply actions  

BA and Tomlin

Let’s not forget one MAJOR thing…..

Tomlin is APPROVING of the way BA handles the offense. They have meetings….Tomlin MUST sign off on the plan. At any time during a game Tomlin COULD say to BA….“yo…ya wanna try to run it here??? maybe the weather is screwing us up?”

I feel the frustration just like everyone else when the offense does some wacky stuff……

But I agree with anyone who says that the reason this team is not making a run at the 7th Lombardi is because of injuires, age—-both old guys not good enough and young guys with no experience…..plus lack of talent in the secondary when TP is not in the game.

Special teams KILLED THIS TEAM. The defense in the 4th KILLED THIS TEAM.

Yeah….if they grind it out and keep the defense rested more for the 4th that would be great, and TP was always the first to say that this D is a D that needs to get off the field because of how they play.

Sooooo I don’t think anything is going to “change” next year. There won’t be a FB, they won’t put FWP and RM in the backfield at the same time…..they are gonna do the same thing and ya know what…..barring injuries and horrible special teams….the team will finish with 12 victories or more, go to the playoffs and maybe bring home #7.

But yeah….I’d like to see a FB and more run attempts. Would love to see a nice draw play….the kind the Patriots always run and seem to get 10 yards each time. I’d love to see more quick passes to save BB…..1, 2 drop pass on the slant…pass on the come back…..short pass, short pass…run run…BOMB….run run short pass BOMB…

Anyway…..Im babbling….sorrreeeee!!!!

by Ragnar808 on Jan 6, 2010 10:49 PM EST reply actions  

and another thing

You did well my friend, i believe too, to many wasted opps not using the screen and we could have used the no-huddle many a time when our offensive line was stinking..

I would recommend more screens, a few trick plays, some planned quarterback sneaks not ben run for his life and then get a few yards I’ve seen Colts play, very nice play calling, very well rounded….there is no reason why we should be passing at 3rd and 1, 2, 3, unless it is for a screen….there is also no reason not to try a run play….there is no reason not to try to go for it on 4th down within the 10 yard line….

everything else needs fixed…offensive line just sucks….i was impressed with ben except for that cincinatti game after the bye, he threw that game and I’d bet quite a bit to support that….

i like the article that what beat the steelers this year was between the ears.
they could have been in the playoffs and more this year, it was a wasted opportunity, and for any of these steelers, especially the defense in the 4th quarter, if they laid back this season because they already won a superbowl, they ought to quit or be fired….it ought to be easily identified on film when they go to review…no names are required….

by Cray Morrison on Jan 6, 2010 10:50 PM EST reply actions  

frustrating

as hell. Coach Tomlin ought to take note to try not to snub 90% of the largest fanbase in football. He’s being just as stubborn as Bruce, by hanging on to Bruce. I can’t see how the guy will change his game planning and play calling for the better. I just don’t see it in ole’ Brucey…

by Prok on Jan 6, 2010 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Still dont think it was the right move.

But what can you do?

Where does Tomlin live? Maybe if we start a tent society outside his house and scream at him and his family every time they leave we can get somewhere.

He wont mind.

We increased our offensive production by 1,000 yards but our points by only 3 touchdowns?
-Johnny_S

by svenhoek on Jan 6, 2010 10:55 PM EST reply actions  

And it would be so classy, too

"The standard of expectation does not change." - Mike Tomlin

by momma rollett on Jan 7, 2010 7:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Please don't

I’ve seen Tomlin’s house actually. It is really nice.

Optimism. Positivity. Win.

by Johnny_S on Jan 7, 2010 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Thats the one thing I can't stand

Don’t involve the family. Yea I disagree with tomlin in keeping him but I would never condone going to either mans house and bothering their families. I’m sure you’re just being sarcastic here though.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

You underestimate crazed fans

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Unfortunately

There people that don’t understand that. If you do bad at your job people don’t come and bother you. Keep it professional and classy.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

So true my friend

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

What?! God no!

I’m packing right now. No sarcasm here, I mean the crazy stuff I say!

I’ll keep it classy though. I’ll only yell obscenities at HIM, ABOUT his family. See, problem solved.

We increased our offensive production by 1,000 yards but our points by only 3 touchdowns?
-Johnny_S

by svenhoek on Jan 7, 2010 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

You are really going out of your way

Don’t you live in Norway or some shite like that?

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Is that Tiger?

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

WTF?

No North Carolina. I was born in Pittsburgh though.

We increased our offensive production by 1,000 yards but our points by only 3 touchdowns?
-Johnny_S

by svenhoek on Jan 7, 2010 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Other problems

 Yeah we had a defense that broke down far to often late in games and a ST’s unit that flat out sucked. But those things can be corrected. Bruce can’t….

by Prok on Jan 6, 2010 10:57 PM EST reply actions  

You guys are picking the fight with the wrong guy

Why BA? Yes he sucks.

But what about special teams coach Ligashesky? Have any of you EVER seen a Steeler special teams this bad?

by EdmontonSteel on Jan 6, 2010 11:10 PM EST reply actions  

This bad?

Perhaps not, but Cowher did have a couple of stinkers.

"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway

by SubLime on Jan 7, 2010 7:52 AM EST up reply actions  

And I'm pretty sure everyone up here believes that

the Special teasm coach will be let go.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I suggest that Bruce Arians read the book ’The Art of War by Sun Tzu

The book is thousands of years old

http://www.military-quotes.com/Sun-Tzu.htm

So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong and to strike at what is weak.
- Sun Tzu, the Art of War

All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near. Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.
- Sun Tzu, the Art of War

If your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.
- Sun Tzu, the Art of War

by lightningrod on Jan 6, 2010 11:31 PM EST reply actions  

deep stuff

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Hopefully...

….he’ll resign and take the time to conceptualized the deeper meaning behind “The Art of War”.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Jan 7, 2010 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm still stuck on

“wine cooler in a case of Rolling Rock”! Priceless.

I agree with you maryrose; changes proposed are spot on and as always, we have to keep in mind that BB is very, very comfortable with Brucey. Does he deserve this chance? Well… judging on the failure to make any adjustments when adjustments to the offensive playbook were beyond needed during this season, then no. He blew his chance.

I guess now it’s Steeler Nation’s job to suck it up and back him (while keeping him under the microscope and calling him out when necessary.)

I still don’t think we’re going to have to suffer through as much of the horrible play calling next year as we did this year. As reluctant as I am to say it…. I’m more willing to back Tomlin’s decision than I am interested in complaining that he didn’t fire BA.

When the tailgate drops, the BS stops. Shut up and play!

by 1BlkGldFan on Jan 6, 2010 11:44 PM EST reply actions  

+1
I’m more willing to back Tomlin’s decision than I am interested in complaining that he didn’t fire BA.

Good call.

"The standard of expectation does not change." - Mike Tomlin

by momma rollett on Jan 7, 2010 7:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree with anyone who thinks the Arians situation is doomed for more frustration. There is a huge difference in the mindset of this offseason. In 2007, Tomlin/Arians first year, they took an 8-8 nonplayoff team and went 10-6. The offense lit up the scoreboard, even in the two late losses to Jacksonville. There was every reason to believe everything was on the right track.

Then in year two the team won the Super Bowl, with the offense coming through in the end. There was every reason to believe that things were still cool, despite the warts.

Now after year three, it’s the first time the Tomlin/Arians duo experienced failure. The mindset during this offseason is completely different. Goodbye Zierlein for starters. These guys are having heart-to-heart discussions about change for the first time in their Steeler careers. They know the status quo is not good anymore. They know changes must be made. Arians knows his job is dependent on making adjustments. The braintrust has made that crystal clear (I am assuming).

If there are no adjustments made next year then I will be wrong and Arians will be gone for sure. But I don’t think that will be the case. Call me a hopeless optimist, but I would bet my house that some of the suggestions we all are pointing out will come true. Each year in the NFL is a completely different world. I think we have much to look forward to.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Jan 6, 2010 11:51 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

+1000

Great post MR, and thanks for your always solid articles.

"The standard of expectation does not change." - Mike Tomlin

by momma rollett on Jan 7, 2010 7:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Except the offense in 2007 ran over 50% of the time and

had the leading rusher in the league. This doesn’t really support your argument. The BA in 2007 was close to what he should strive to be in 2010 (except the naked QB boot with Ben in JAX game).

by mactastic07 on Jan 7, 2010 9:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Good post as usual MR.

A few of my own cents…

1. I’m always surprised to see that the time of possession was good this year. I don’t think we were leaving our defense in a bad position. They didn’t have nearly as many short fields to defend this year as opposed to 2008. I think BA’s offense did a good job of eating up clock most of the time. Granted on those three and outs where the offense threw the ball each time it goes pretty darn quick, but thems the breaks.

2. I think one thing he needs to start doing is really looking at short field offense. We do a really poor job of executing when we can’t stretch the field. We had lots and lots of 20+ yard passes this season and that’s awesome. But when we didn’t have the room to run those routes our offense stagnated. I think it’s then that you need to be able to grind out 4 yards a carry and just trust your RB. It’d help if he didn’t drop the ball though.

3. I agree that empty sets need to be few and far between. There’s some good plays to run out of them, but in short yardage make the linebackers bite on the run action occassionally.

by Chicago Steeler on Jan 7, 2010 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

well

1. i’m curious to what our time of possession is in the 4th quarter, I believe thats the problem.

2. True

#. True

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

point #2

That’s also why they struggled in the red zone. Ben’s at his best when he camps out in the pocket, pump fakes about six times and heaves it deep. None of that stuff works in the red zone though. We’ve either got to have a capable running game or a short quick passing game. I love Ben’s improvisation skills but I’d love to see the ball come out of his hands at the end of a three step drop every once in a while.

by cgolden on Jan 7, 2010 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

And what the hell would be so wrong

with a Mendenhall screen down there or a skinny post (nothing against fat ones). Sheesh, let’s show some creativity dag nab it.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

There was some of that and I loved it every time I saw it. I’m amazed that we struggle so much getting Holmes into the endzone. I feel like we’re missing something there. Hines is money finding soft spots, but why are we not seeing Holmes on quick slants and other routes to beat the man coverage?

This is another area where I wonder if Ben needs more guidance. He seems to want the TD a lot and doesn’t look for underneath stuff. We can get there in multiple downs, that’s even better in many instances.

by Chicago Steeler on Jan 7, 2010 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

You nailed it chewie.

There were four or five games in a row when there was a screen and/or Mendenhall was the quick read, that went for 15 – 25 yards each time. Then they never went back to it!!! Not that they need to run it 10 times a game, but how about three or four times?

Look what Mendenhall did in the Miami game when he caught it? Not bad, right?

It was also slow down some of the pressure on Ben and help keep him upright. Run it enough to keep the D honest…..

by dawgs144 on Jan 7, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly dawgs

or at least the THREAT of it from time to time, eh?

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Amen brother.

I think Moore is a 3rd down option for this as well….or how about a quick release for Heath? Dam, not everything has to go for 50 yards in the pass game (expect when they need 10 and throw it for 7). ARGH

by dawgs144 on Jan 7, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Perhaps

you and I should be the OC

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I can help maybe

but I’m not sure if I have the tempermant not to yell all the time. You’re much more level headed than I am.

by dawgs144 on Jan 7, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

And wasn't Moore

used that way quite effectively in ‘08 when Mendy and Parker were out? Some things I just don’t understand.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, he was. And disappeared when they

did those FREAKIN’ empty back field sets!!!!!

by dawgs144 on Jan 7, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Somebody must pay for this

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

mixed feelings

I almost wish Zierlein was fired after last year, because I thought the O-line made big improvements this year. At times you had to be proud of them.
  
Of course, 50 sacks is just gross, but protection improved, Colon’s penalties declined and Max seemed worth his overpaid contract (you know you make too much when you pay CASH for a home — unless it’s in Fayette or Greene county).

I think the first Baltimore game proved they can run block well if needed (plus Mendy had 4.6 ypc for the season which isn’t shabby).

I go back and forth loving and hating Arians, but not every team gets to complain that their offense is too explosive for their defense’s own good. Plus, injuries to Troy and Aaron Smith made for tough sledding (it’s not an excuse, but it is a reality).

When it’s all said and done (as it is now), I believe this is the same team as last year’s, except all the big game-winning plays that went our way last season, didn’t go our way this year (dropped interceptions, dropped touchdowns, missed tackles). What if Deshea drops the pick against Dallas, or Tone is ruled not in the end zone against baltimore last year?

You can’t ignore the 4th quarter performances this year, unless we win a couple more of those games. Then we could talk about 4th quarter stats for days, all while we point to the scoreboard.

the only think i still can’t understand about this season was the loss to Cleveland. I’m still not sure what happened that day. That and the WR pass call against Miami (wasn’t Hines the college QB?)

good article maryrose

run that bus

by kwc112 on Jan 7, 2010 12:57 AM EST reply actions  

BA is a 57 year old man...

…and has been in football longer than most on BTSC have been alive. If he didn’t noticed the things Maryrose has pointed out so eloquently while he was our wide receiver coach and he didn’t notice them during his first season, nor his second or his third, …well, I’m not hopeful.

I’ve said this before, I do not have a problem with being a pass first team. However, I cannot understand the reasoning that suggests that being a pass first team precludes being committed to the run, these are not mutually exclusive conditions but they’ll remain so as long as BA is our OC.

BA has too often laid out evidence of being either stupid or unconscionably conceited, either way he is not likely to ever be a reliable, responsible OC.

The Steelers are my team and I don’t know how to watch this sport without being a Steeler fan, so I will be rooting for them but I seem doomed to do so pained and aggrieved for yet another season.

by Marvin, The Paranoid Android on Jan 7, 2010 1:46 AM EST reply actions  

I'm copy / pasting a friend's post here...

This is what he said before the announcement of B.A. staying for another year.
*****************************
So, if I’m Tomlin and I’m allowed to keep Arians, this is what I tell him:
1) There will be NO empty backfield formations on 3rd and short. Throw it to
your heart’s content, but we’re not telegraphing to the other team that they can
abandon their run defense. 2) I’m going to have very limited patience with
empty backfields on 1st and 10. 3) Screen passes are great ways to beat a
blitz. Try it sometime. 4) When it becomes obvious early in a game that
the offensive line is struggling, shorten up the passing game and don’t call for
long pass patterns. If you forget this directive, you will be forced to watch
the ‘08 Philly game every day for a month. 5) There is no league rule that
says "Inside the opponent’s ten yard line, you will run the ball on first down
and throw it on second and third down." Mix it up a little. Heck, you might
even consider putting in a power package just for a goof. 6) It might be
boring, but there is something to be said for grinding out the clock when you have a lead. Every second our offense is on the field is a second the oppositions offense
isn’t toasting our DBs. Tick…tick…tick; that’s the sound of victory. I
implicitly trust our offense to be able to score late if we have to, but let’s
not set up scenarios where we have to if we can avoid it.

If Bruce can live with those directives, he’s more than welcome to stay as far
as I’m concerned.
Chris

by Bonek on Jan 7, 2010 2:50 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

I remember reading that

Good post. MR and your friend appear to be on the same page.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 8:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Nail On The Head

The offense wasn’t the reason for this season of heartache, the defense did at times let us down, but as you stated maybe if we had controlled the ball more this wouldn’t have happened. I have been a Steeler fan for 37 years and took pride in the way we mauled teams even when they knew what was coming, to see an empty backfield on 3rd & 1 or 2 made me wanna puke!! Times change but let’s not forget what made the Steeers the Steelers!!!

by SoFlaSteeler on Jan 7, 2010 8:03 AM EST reply actions  

Well put MR

Well put sir.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 8:46 AM EST reply actions  

What if Crackers is the cat?

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 8:49 AM EST reply actions  

It would be ...

good to remember that many times the Steelers did nothing in 3d and short situations. That certainly doesn’t generate confidence in the run. Here’s a little snippet from CNN SI -
“The standard notions of how to win in the NFL -
run, stop the run — are leather helmets now. Ten quarterbacks threw for more than 4,000 yards. Thirty-two QBs combined for 104 300-yard passing games." Certainly implies the game is changing …

by tenthmtnman on Jan 7, 2010 8:53 AM EST reply actions  

Not sure ...

how I got that “struck through” but it shouldn’t be.

by tenthmtnman on Jan 7, 2010 8:53 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m really hoping that Arians has had his “come to Jesus” moment regarding offense playcalling theory and Northeastern U.S. weather. I’m all for balance, but I think you need to be versatile enough come late November to be able to road grind it out when possible. I’m not saying go to an Cornhusker I formation, maybe just a split backfield with a dedicated fullback. Combine that with a man blocking scheme rather than a zone blocking scheme, and let the talent make the difference, not the play call.

Unfortunately, I think we’re going to need the first 4-5 picks on the defensive side in the draft, so at best we could get a 5,6,7 round fullback.

by skyeandangus on Jan 7, 2010 9:02 AM EST reply actions  

My only complaint for those BA supporters is...

he wasn’t intelligent enought to adjust his philosophy throughout the season, so what makes everybody so optimistic he will change in the 2010 season?

MR, I agree whole-heartedly with your post, but the 4 suggestions you cite are the 4 things he didn’t do in 2009 and the reason I believe he should have hit the road. I don’t care how many times he runs or passes, I’m most concerned with putting points on the board. The most disturbing trend I witnessed was the predictability o his offense—I bet I could count the number of plays he calls on 2 hands.

He loathes a grind-it-out style of game, which includes a short passing game. Along with Ben, BA is constantly looking for the home run. It is possible to play ball-control offense with an effective passing game, but that is not what BA wants.

Since I bleed black and gold, I’ll remain cautiously optimistic. But, I hope it doesn’t come at the expense of the 2010 season.

by mactastic07 on Jan 7, 2010 9:12 AM EST reply actions  

He adjusts ...

to a predominantly running game and the Steelers don’t finish 9-7.

by tenthmtnman on Jan 7, 2010 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

well said rose

BA isn’t a great offensive coordinator and of course there are times when we don’t agree with play calls in certain situations but you make a compelling case as to why he should still be here.

by cgolden on Jan 7, 2010 9:16 AM EST reply actions  

Remember guys

you can’t teach imagination.

Steelers football is 60 mins.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 7, 2010 9:46 AM EST reply actions  

But you can imagine teaching

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

You "optimists" underestimate Bruces...

Huge freakin’ EGO. That is the one reason why he will NOT make needed adjustments in his scheme. Much the same way he was limited at in-game adjustments. It is my opinion that he will go down swinging with his scheme and it will cost us another year to find this out.

 I’ve seen reports that Ben saved his job, Ben runs the team, yadda yadda. TOMLIN has final say.

 I’d LOVE to see Bruce change and adjust but it’s not in his mental make-up IMO. We’ll see.

by Prok on Jan 7, 2010 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

The problem with Arians is simple

He isn’t a good game day coach. Much the same can be said of Tomlin, whose clock management skills suck, to say the least.

That said, Arians is arguably the best play designer in all of football. Whatever else you can say about Arians, he draws routes and pulls gaurds with the best of ’em.

What the Steelers need to do is make it a point to improve game day coaching, something has been sorely lacking since Bill Cowher left. And, no, I don’t think we need to degenerate into Martyball. But, a concerted effort to stick to a 45-55 run-pass ratio would do little to limit this offense.

by theobserver on Jan 7, 2010 11:30 AM EST reply actions  

Geez.. I disagree with Steeler Nation :(

I hate to say it, but the offense wasn’t why we didn’t make the playoffs.

The offense gave us leads in the 4th in most of our loses. It’s our defense that lost those games.

Sure it would have been nice to have an offense that can grind down the clock.

But if the offense gives you a lead in the 4th, its the defense that needs to stop the other team from taking it back.

How many times did the defense give up 14-21 points in the 4th quarter to cost us the game

I think we are good with our coaching situation, but if we have to can one of the coaches based on what happened last year, I think its LeBeau’s head that should be on the chopping block, not Arians’.

Yea, I know its almost blasphemy, but there were so many games this year where we got the lead, and I thought to myself awesome! now the defense shuts them down or we get a pick and gameover… but the defense let them score again and again.

by arglebargle2 on Jan 7, 2010 11:37 AM EST reply actions  

The theory is

many of those games should not have even been close had the O been able to finish off more of those drives that ended in FGs (or missed FGs, INTs, fumbles and the like). The O did not have a killer mentality like the Colts, Pats and Saints of the world. If that were the case, the burden would not have been on the undermanned D (no Troy, no Aaron). You can have all the stats in the world but if you are stopped at the 1 inch line then big fat hairy deal. That comes down to coaching tactics.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions  

That's an outdated, Cowher-Era way of thinking...

everyone wants to commend BA for bringing the offense into the next generation, but then blame the defense for not protecting leads. Who says the offense can’t score enough points that make it extremely easy for the defense to protect the lead.

It’s a cop out to say everyone who is frustrated with BA wants to run the ball come hell or high water. That’s BS. I want to score more points than the opponent, period! BA was awful at situational football, nobody can deny that. Unless that improves, this team will continue to struggle. We can’t rely on having an All-World defense every year. At some point, the team we’ll have to rely on the offense to win games and put the lead out of reach.

All of our losses were close. Imagine if in those games the O could have converted one of those FGs against Cincy or Cleveland into TDs. This team would be in the playoffs. Equal blame can be placed on all 3 phases of the game. But don’t pretend Arians didn’t screw the pooch repeatedly when this team needed to score TDs in big situations.

by mactastic07 on Jan 7, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Dates back much farther than Cowher

but you are right. Who says you have to get a lead and sit on it (looking at you Marty). I admire the current administration’s desire to go for the kill but, when everyone knows what the hell you are going to do, it is only counter productive!

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I just heard the news today and it made me sick to my stomach you are one coach that is not on my favorite list. It almost came to a point that I started to despise this team and ban steeler football until you were gone. But that is a difficult task to do when you have grown up in a family of three generations of steeler football. And me writing this team off before I see what changes are made next year would not be fair of me. BA I am almost to the point of hating you for what you have allowed to happen to this team and yes in my mind you single handedly put this team in bad positions with your Pennsylvania lottery play calling. And fiquring for the defense to help you out which in turns makes them look bad. And yes I wish it was you that got fired but just like relatives you cant take responsibility for them being in your family you just respect them and move on. Well I will respect you for another year of BS BA and hope that the next one is better.

P.S. Mike Tomlin even though I am a fan of your (at the moment) (nice to c a brother doing well) you r slowly getting to the point of BA with me and that because u r the head coach Time to stop talking like it and start acting like it what you say goes because the decline this team is taking at this moment falls on you its your record not any other coaches that show up so get on your game and take total control of this team

Sincerely
The Iron Fist

by The Iron Fist on Jan 7, 2010 12:01 PM EST reply actions  

I wonder how much of this BA hatred

stems from the fact that at one time he was in the employ of the Brownies?

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 12:16 PM EST reply actions  

Naaa It's because he won't do what they want him to do

They must be disgruntled parents.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jan 7, 2010 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

the clowns

 were at least smart enough to fire brucey !!

by Prok on Jan 7, 2010 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you ever notice

that no other team picked him up as an OC? The Steelers hired him to be the QB coach! Honestly, I think he should get his ass up into the booth to call plays. You know, modern warfare became much easier when the Generals could get a birds eye view of the battlefield.

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 1:13 PM EST up reply actions  

that might be a bad idea

the booth view would be more like madden and he might get a little excited

by klompus on Jan 7, 2010 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

too obvious, but...

Didn’t the Browns fire Belichick too?

by chicos_pants on Jan 7, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

yes, that was before cameras were small and portable though

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: DIck Lebeau, Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Chris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"If you give Arians a fullback, he won’t use one. Instead, he insists on using Matt Spaeth, who probably doesn’t cast a shadow because it would require blocking sunlight." stellin with some very true words

by WVPiratesfan on Jan 7, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions  

NICE!

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 7, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks MR, another winner.

I’m not a BA fan myself, but you sure know the best way to stimulate the conversation in how you write. Really well done….

by dawgs144 on Jan 7, 2010 4:06 PM EST reply actions  

nice post

I think we should do back and read Tomlin’s comments before the season about imitating the Pats: to have an offense that could run or pass depending on the team they were playing. That’s not the Bill Cowher offense. As others have said, this is in large part Tomlin’s plan, not Arians’. Personally, I like it — if they can do it. Still need to be able to make short yardage running though.

I’m also not buying that the o line’s ok. It’s adequate, but look at (say) the Ravens, who have put some top picks there over the last 2-3 years. Maybe the picks didn’t break our way in the last two drafts. With the Ravens, several of these picks contributed immediately, so it’s not a 3-5 year process.

Either way, lots to look forward to for next year. If Cinci and the Jets could both lose this weekend, I’d almost be ok with this year.

by 57_Varieties on Jan 7, 2010 4:40 PM EST reply actions  

The post of great analogys.

These days it seems like MaryRoses posts are few and far between but It feels like Christmas when I get to read them.

 I’m not going to repeat all that’s been said. You should all know how I feel about BA. His plan racks up the yards and not the points. If this were the BCS or another system where wins don’t hold full merit than go for it.

This is the NFL. An NFL that is changing. You can buy into all that hype about running the ball not getting you into the playoffs because SD and IND are there with the worst of the running games. The fact is, that this league doesn’t put the same strengths into the post season every year. It’s weird.

Sometimes you’ll see a slew of teams with monster D’s and almost no O. Sometimes you’ll see a team that can’t pass but can grind out the yards. And this year we see teams that can air it out for the cameramen.

Just because this is the year of the pass doesn’t mean it’s the only way to go from here on out. I think MT wants to run hard and pass later.

 Arians’ play calling throughout his career has yet to really change. He’s going to do the exact same thing he did last season. I promise you that.

 A revamped line and a shored up secondary should help cover his flaws.

 If they don’t. You’ll see why he’s a bottle of Zima in a case of Arrogant Bastard Ale. ;)

"Most football teams are temperamental. That's 90% temper and 10% mental."
--Doug Plank

Xbox Live Gamertag- Alf Ardanyu

by SoCalSteelerFan on Jan 7, 2010 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

Solid suggestions

But I disagree that Arians is some kind of cutting-edge offensive strategist. Actually, he has an uncanny knack for calling absolutely the wrong play in critical situations. If this isn’t grounds for dismissal of an OC, perhaps someone can explain to me what is.

You’re right, though that running the ball won’t help much. Unless the NFL drastically alters the rules that it has implemented during the past 10-15 years, establishing the run will never again have much importance in the pro game. Quite simply, it’s too easy for teams to outscore you via the pass. As the Steelers have often demonstrated in recent years, time of possession has become largely irrelevant in today’s game.

But you’re right again that we need to run the ball on third and short. But this implies a short-yardage, 3rd-down back who can push the pile. One more point: why does Arians call so many mid- to long-range passes on first down? And why does he continually call go-for-broke pass plays anytime the Steelers move the ball close to mid-field? What’s wrong with gaining 8, 10 or 12 yards with shorter passes and just driving the ball down the field? You don’t always have to go for the bomb and, in fact, it’s a low-percentage play in the NFL.

I have a serious doubt that things will change significantly next season if Arians stays.

by Billy52 on Jan 7, 2010 6:53 PM EST reply actions  

haha

Right now I’d consider ole’ Brucey the luckiest man in sports. Wonder what he does to deserve Ben’s undying support ?? Betcha he’ll send Ben a gift for saving his ass too. lol

by Prok on Jan 7, 2010 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

New Show coming out: "Everyone Loves Bruce Arians"

What the fokkin’ fokk!?

You are either joking or you are trying to be the smart, doing something positive for the steeler nation, the rationale is “everyone is depressed and BA sucks, but if we are going to stick with him, lets give support, lets tell him how great he is and who knows, maybe next season he turns up to be great, for the first time in his career and everybody will love me because Im positive” .. hope its the latter ’cause that is kind of smart indeed..

If the first option is the one though, you could not have missed more,

First, if you think he is great, that already shows you have no clue about the game and the post is dumb,

then you write him like if he was a little kid or retard, and you ask things that obviously he is aware of, why? You think he didnt know it was a tough weather to throw in Cleveland? You think he doesnt know how strong Rashard is? You think he likes Ben being sacked 50 times a season for multiple years? Or maybe you think thats news to us! How redundant.

Let me just say right now, if he was not aware of all the things you wanted to say to him, he MUST be fired, and if he knew and obviously he did, then he MUST go anyway because that shows he has a serious mental condition..

Anyway,

I tell you what, throw your stats in the trash can because they dont win superbowls, the 2 most important factors to win superbowls are a great defense and an offense who can close games, who can execute in critical moments, basically offenses who can score points any time needed. What you need is a bad ass defense and a smart situational offense. Bruce Arians is not smart, his situational “stats” are awfull. HIs performance through critical moments is laughable and honestly? NO ONE deserves to watch things like that Santonio throw, what in the name of a goat was that anyway?? That play alone should make this man get fired,

If you guys want to have a couple of more years with an arrogant preek as OC who turned our franchise QB into a spoiled brat who thinks he owns the entire franchise, a guy who thinks he can do whatever he wants and screw others, its fine, let me be the first one who tells you all, this offense WON’T change! We will be head scratching with his calls until his last day in Pittsburgh, and I guarantee, if we dont have a super defense again next year, he will finally go and I will be the first one to laugh on this ridiculous “situational” BA bandwagon,

or perhaps you are doing the second option I mentioned, then its ok.. ;)
 
Bite me.

by setherian on Jan 8, 2010 2:47 AM EST reply actions  

Stay classy

Your opinions are great. We don’t all have to share them. Though I get as frustrated as you. I’m only guessing here, but you are frustrated, right?

The only managing Ben does is he manages to WIN games

by chewiesteeler on Jan 8, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not the biggest BA supporter but...

So I guess the man get’s no credit for a SB winning drive?

How many WR passes did Whiz call during his tenure?

by cgolden on Jan 8, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

40-year decline of the running game in the NFL

Here are some revealing stats from two Super Bowls played 40 years apart:

Super Bowl III (Jets vs. Colts):
*285 total yards rushing (net)
*66 total rushing plays
*17 first downs rushing

Super Bowl XLIV (Steelers vs. Cardinals);
*91 total yards rushing (net)
*37 total rushing plays
*6 first downs rushing

At this rate, running will become nearly obsolete in another 10 years.

by Billy52 on Jan 8, 2010 9:30 PM EST reply actions  

First, you should really only count from 1978, when the rules were changed to encourage the passing game.

Second, looking only at Super Bowls is a ridiculously small sample size.

That said, the NFL is definitely a passing league. However, running the football is still important, especially in the 4th quarter when clock management is paramount.

by BigRedSteelerFan on Jan 8, 2010 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Bruce

Not a fan,but good letter.Anybody behind that line other than BEN..Would not have won the Super-bowl last year,thank god he can get away.Protect him and run more,save the defense so they got gas in the tank in the 4th.Get a CB while your shopping.Get well TROY and play more in 2010.

by steelman25270 on Jan 9, 2010 7:57 AM EST reply actions  

Right on, maryrose

Also, good statistical points, mikemex:

9 out of 10 couch coaches agree, the offense’s main goal is, ta dah,
“SCORING POINTS
We are great at moving the ball and we have great stats, but 12th in scoring offence and 21-ranking in red zone touchdown efficiency, Tampa Bay was better in red zone.”

21st? Those issues must be identified and addressed. If you’re passing near the endzone, it’s a shorter field, a more compact space, usu. with quicker reads, no deep option to really stretch the D, passes are often slants, some fades, with less opportunities to draw plays out and make something happen after things were initially covered, less double-moves route. Right? How about study the film of the best at it from the last couple years.

Don’t forget that in ’08 the Steelers offense faced an extremely tough schedule of defenses (Ravens, Eagles, Giants, Redskins, Titans, Ravens to name a few). wolfpacksteelersfan detailed this at http://wolfpacksteelersfan.wordpress.com/2009/09/09/analyzing-the-steelers-2009-schedule/#more-185

- not sure how the actual ’09 defensive strength of schedule panned out compared to the preseason predictions based on ’08 results, but according to my eye test, it clearly was not as tough. On the other hand, the defense forced approximately 5 more turnovers in ’08 giving the O some extra opportunities.

Nice points, klompus——-“the 31 and 32 ranked run games of San Diego and Indy each have at least 6 more rushing touchdowns than us…” In today’s NFL, obviously you can have tons of success as a team w/o tons of rushing yardage, but you also have to be able to when you want to, in order to hold a lead, to give your D a rest, to get a short first down/TD.

http://footballoutsiders.com is worth a look, particularly Statistics, Team Offense.

by steagle34 on Jan 9, 2010 10:37 PM EST reply actions  

3rd & 1

I just did a comp on 3rd & 1 over the ’04, ’05 , ’08 & ’09 seasons. Surprise is that Steelers actually ran more effectively on 3rd & 1 in ’09 than during the other 3 seasons

by swissvale72 on Jan 10, 2010 5:09 AM EST reply actions  

BA

I agree with all of your points but on #1, there are times where we could probably pass on 3rd and 1, but never with an empty backfield. That has to be the dumbest play in the world. If you pass there, you need play action to keep the defense honest and freeze the linebackers for a second. Having an open backfield is beyond ridiculous. To your point again, we absolutely have to establish the run on those downs first, then we could throw in an occasional play action pass.

by BigSteel on Jan 11, 2010 3:09 PM EST reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Ranking the 32 NFL QBs
Clint_small
This Week's Matchup: Offense
Btsc_pic_small
The Difference Between Quarterbacks
F15_small
Hump Day Mix: Regular Season week 1, Atlanta Falcons
Small
The Redman Thing Has Gone Far Enough...

Recent FanPosts

Small
Love/Hate Relationship with Rashard Mendenhall?
0201091651_1__small
Predict the Score!! ( and season Record)
Prod_small
Week 1 Atlanta
Clint_small
Worthington Released
Btsc_pic_small
You Heard It Here First
Small
Quick Analysis of the Ravens WR corps

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo +15 updates

NFL Week 1: Previewing And Predicting Every Game Of Opening Weekend

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Indianapolis Colts: Still The Team To Beat In The AFC

ATLANTA - AUGUST 19:  Quarterback Tom Brady #12 of the New England Patriots sits on the bench during the preseason game against the Atlanta Falcons at the Georgia Dome on August 19 2010 in Atlanta Georgia.  The Patriots beat the Falcons 28-10.  (Photo by Mike Zarrilli/Getty Images) link

Tom Brady Involved In Car Accident, But Emerges Uninjured

More from SBNation.com >


Site Founder & Editor

Me2_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Contributing Authors

Small RickVa

Img_1331_small Neal Coolong

Plainview_small Frank Mineo (DYMS)

Surf_small Johnny_S