I have noticed that over the years, since 2001, the Pats have had our number..We did beat them in BB's rookie year and have not beaten him since. Then I ask myself, could it be a wrong defensive scheme by coach dad? I have this question, why is it that the ravens, who play a similar defensive scheme that we use, and play them VERY tough? Example: in 2007, which the pats went undefeated, barely held off the 5-11 ravens that year? If the raven coaching staff didn't call that time out, that game was over...with Klye Boller at QB!!
Now in 2009, the ravens go to foxboro and get robbed by the officials and the Pats win..Very close game that the ravens should have one..though, they did get revenge in the playoffs..
Now, this year, ravens get robbed again at foxboro..with the smae scheme that we use..
The J-E-T-S play a similar defense also, lots more blitzing though..yes, they have revis, but he can't cover everyone..
What I am saying is this, its not the def scheme thats flawed, (ravens, jets) its the fact that our offense cannot sustain drives..the Jets and the ravens have superior O-Lines than we do..
So, why is everyone screaming at Lebeau, when this scheme really works against the pats?