thoughts on the o-line
FootballOutsiders.com has wonderful stats going back at least a decade on various aspects of each NFL team. They have a section in their stats section on offensive lines, in which they analyze effectiveness of the line in run blocking and pass protection. You can visit the site to read the details on the methodology, but it seems pretty sound to me. The interesting thing I found is that, as bad as the current offensive line is playing, its rank in both run and pass blocking is essentially the same as it was in all of 2008. That year, the o-line ranked 24 in run blocking and 29 in pass protection, whereas this year (through 14 games) it ranks 25 and 30. This means that if Pittsburgh were to win the SB, the offensive line that delivers the 7th Lombardi trophy would be only very marginally worse than the historically worst one to win it--the one from two years ago.
The other interesting thing I discovered is that the line has been terrible at pass protection for as long as Big Ben has been QB. I looked at was how the line performed going back far into FootballOutsider stats and found that in the late 90's the Steelers were pretty good at run blocking and middling at pass protection. By 2002, they were still in the top ten in run blocking and a little above #20 in pass protection. By 2004, however, Ben's second year in the league, they had dropped to 28 in pass protection and run blocking had fallen to the high teens as well. I do believe that the quality of the line declined over time as top picks were replaced with lower picks, and this is reflected in the gradual deteriation of th Steelers' run blocking rankings over the course of the decade. However, the pass protection stats absolutely plummeted over a relatively short period of time. This is less likely related to personnel on the line, in my opinion, as it is related to Big Ben taking over as QB.
As we all know, Big Ben likes to hold onto the ball, making even a good line look average and an average line (which Pittsburgh had as he entered the league) look poor. I've known that this is an issue, but I hadn't realized how clearly you can see it in the stats.
To be sure, the line quality is bad due to injuries this year and drafting neglect or failure over time, and I use the gradually declining run blocking stats as the proxy for and proof of this. However, the dramatic and sudden fall in pass blocking rankings I blame on Big Ben.
What this seems to mean is that Big Ben might make even the Colts or Pats' lines look bad. It also means that the Pittsburgh line might actually play better if Manning or Brady were behind it.
Thoughts?
22 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Offensive Line is just bad
How many sacks does Ben avoid by using his mobility and size where other QB’s would be down in a heap? We need O line help bad (Simple as that). This year, given all the injuries, I think we are actually doing quite well and Pouncey is a stud but we have to keep drafting in this area. No more wasted picks on pansy running backs like Mendehall. Anybody else think he runs scared?
Fairly certain that no one else thinks the back who is leading the league in yards after contact “runs scared”. I believe most of think Mendenhall is a stud running behind a middling line.
by NYCSteelersFan on Dec 14, 2010 9:32 PM EST up reply actions
no, and no
ben has to avoid sacks because he hangs onto the ball for so long in the first place. anybody wanna look up the time he holds onto the ball on average vs the NFL average? that would be a good stat to have. i also strongly disagree with your view on mendenhall. maybe your expectations are still too high from the bettis era.
No can do
Bettis would have trouble getting yards behind this line. He had a solid O-line to lead the way for him. Yes Mendy dances too much some times, but he is a top 10 rusher right now with a duct tape O-line
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Dec 15, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions
I don't think it is Big Ben's fault.
give ben 3-5 seconds and he should get rid of the ball..look at how brady always gets 4 or more seconds behind that line but because he throws the ball in less than 3 seconds most of the time..u don’t notice.. I saw the jets vs patriots game and brady had all day to throw against the jets “good” defense.big ben is not the kind of guy to throw it in 2 seconds like brady so thats y more ppl say he holds on to the ball..he wants the big play and the line won’t give 3 seconds a lot..so the way I see it how long is too long?
+1
You can’t blame it all on Big Ugly. You have to look at why he holds the ball too long. Most of the time it is due to having to scramble just to stay upright because the line gave him 1-2 seconds in the pocket. It takes time to break tackles, rip defenders hands out of his facemask, scramble away from them to make a throw. I don’t have the stats, but i am willing to bet that the amount of times that he “holds the ball too long” being the O-line’s fault far outweighs the times that he does it to himself.
this
I also think is why there are problems hitting Wallace on time, Ben has to break a tackle and scramble to get the throw off
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Dec 15, 2010 9:47 AM EST up reply actions
Urbik
I think we may have given up on Urbik too soon. He didn’t look bad in Buffalo, well, at least until he ended up on the IR. I think I would rather kept him than Legursky.
Urbik only plays gaurd
Legursky plays Gaurd, Center, FB and I have seen him on Kick Returns
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Its too bad that NHL is taken because the National Football League has become the National Hypocrite League" Mark Schlereth
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
by WVPiratesfan on Dec 15, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
Legursky did a good job when he filled in earlier this year.
by NYCSteelersFan on Dec 15, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
Legursky...
is crap, see where he is now…on the bench.
clearly the guy's not a starter, I didn't dispute that.
He’s a quality backup and far more versatile than Urbik.
by NYCSteelersFan on Dec 15, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions
I get that, but...
Legursky plays multiple positions, but doesn’t excel at any of them. Other than being a jack-of-all-trades, he has no upside. He did an adequate job in limited action, but he’s okay at best.
Urbik plays guard, and filled in at center for Buffalo. He’s only been in the league 2 years, and has potential to be better. Not saying he’s better than Foster, Kemo, or Essex now….but he COULD be.
I think you also need to take into the context of the overall offensive philosophy. The Steelers – even under Whiz – passed more with Ben than without him. This, of course, is for good reason: Ben is a really good – maybe great – QB and you’re going to want to exploit his talent. Some people say that Bill Cowher ran so much because he favored it over the pass, but I wonder if it wasn’t a function of Cowher never finding a QB he felt both had the physical/mental talent to put the team on their shoulders and was trustworthy in such a situation.
The Pre-Ben lines were drafted primarily for their run blocking ability (they’re bigger and heavier than a line drafted primarily to protect the passer – take a look at the OL of the Colts or Pats), and were never asked to do the same amount of pass blocking as the current line. The guys were drafted to be downhill road graders, not passive protectors and it showed from time to time.
You’re essentially right though. By the time Ben started the line was old (Hartings, Faneca), injured (Smith, Simmons), or Max Starks. Pouncey is a step in the right direction, but he needs to be complimented by other high picks if the Steelers want to keep their QB out of the trainers room.
by BluegrassSteeler on Dec 15, 2010 10:02 AM EST reply actions
crap
I think blaming Ben is crap. I know it is the conventional wisdom in the league, but for every sack that is his fault, he avoids two or three. count the protection and you rarely get to 3 seconds. Most of the time he does not hold it too long. Just look at Peyton Manning this year. Is he holding it too long now that his line is crap? Would you rather have Ben throw a pick six like Peyton (instead of getting hit)?
He could be better at diagnosing the coverage ahead of time, but most of the sacks are not his fault. His line is crap. (and too many deep pass plays called)
Line problems
Right now the biggest problem on the OL for the Steelers is this idiot we signed from Buffalo name Jonathan Scott, I have said it here before…he is by far the worst OL man I have ever seen, he has no technique and is easily beat. The other guys make some mistakes during games and thats not a problem with me, the other guys get paid too…but he is horrid, most of the pressure on Ben is coming from his blind side, and I don’t blame him for having happy feet and getting out of the pocket or stepping up early to avoid what he knows is coming from behind.
I have seen Trai Essex play LT before and he sure as hell didn’t play as bad as this guy, he wouldn’t be a permanent solutions but he can’t be any worse than Scott. Right now he is our problem and the biggest one, he does basically nothing correctly, especially in the passing game. Anyone who disagees with me is a Ravens fan!
Hard to disagree
especially considering that he has something 2nd most holding penalties int he league and has played 6-8 games or so (could be wrong on that)
by NYCSteelersFan on Dec 15, 2010 4:34 PM EST up reply actions
OL
I would agree that the OL has never been good at pass protection and has decreased significantly in run blocking ability over the past decade. There’s no doubt that Ben has made things worse, but the line has sucked for pretty much his whole time here. I don’t agree with those that think that Ben wouldn’t be better and more consistent with an OL that does anything well.
I’d say the line was about to turn a corner this year before injuries derailed us. Last year was better than 2008 (according to my eyes, anyway) and the addition of Pouncey would have given us at least an average line, IMO. We have some questions going into next year, but if Colon and Starks come back from their injuries and we continue to look for guards in the early to middle rounds, this could become a good OL pretty quickly. But we’re stuck with Scott for now.
charity standing orders
OL's fault!
If you believed it was Ben’s fault, all you really have to do is go back to the beginning of the year….. In the first game, a mobile Dennis Dixon behind a healthy OL was sacked 3 times on 29 dropbacks (atts + sacks)…. he had 2 rushing attempts. Week 2, passing was horrid! Dixon and Batch combined for 43 yards passing on 21 dropbacks. They were sacked 4 times, and attempted 4 rushes. Week 3, thanks more to the Bucs trying to stop the run and having no pass rush at all, Batch was not sacked in 17 attempts. He rushed 5 times for 26 yards. Week 4 against the Ravens, 2 sacks on 23 drops, 1 rush for 4 yards.
So, the first 4 games with Dixon and Batch gave you these stats…… 81 attempts, 9 sacks… 90 dropbacks, 9 sacks… 10% of the time either one of them went to pass, they went down.
9 games since, with Big Ben and a OL that is not as healthy as it was…… 291 attempts, 26 sacks….. 317 dropbacks, 26 sacks, 8.2% of the time Ben goes down.
Further, in the 1st 4 games they were running more, passing much less…. they averaged 22.5 dropbacks a game without Ben, 35 per game with him! So defenses know they are passing more, yet the percentage of passing plays that led to sacks has gone down.
This is not Ben’s fault, it is because of him these stats are as good as they are! Could you imagine how many sacks Batch or Byron would have sitting back there? To blame Ben for the sacks is pretty outrageous.
This OL needs an influx of talent. The Steelers FO had better pay attention to how much Ben is taking a beating this year. He is the franchise right now, protect him and we have a chance against whomever we play. Without him, we are not an elite team. What is the record against Baltimore lately….. 6-0 when Ben plays, 0-3 when he does not….. That is not a fluke, it shows the difference of 2 similiarly talented teams separated only by the play of the QB.
by imike29 on Dec 15, 2010 3:00 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
thats why we need to sign
Mankins of Nicks to play guard and draft or sign a DB..jonathan Joseph comes to mind..
A man is innocent untill proven guilty...Even if it's Ben Roethlisberger!
'I rather have a German division in front of me than a French division behind me'..General George Patton
" I don't care if he has two horns and a tail, as long as he is anti-communist"..General Douglas MacArthur..
"The way to end our dependence on foreign oil is to keep our tires properly inflated"....B. Hussein Obama
"Government is not the solution to our problems, it is the cause of them" Ronald Wilson Reagan..40th President of the United States
+1
Build a young solid line around Pouncey.
by NYCSteelersFan on Dec 15, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions

by 





























