Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Missouri Crashes The Top Line After Kansas Win

Assessing Week 1 of 2010 NFL Free Agency

Last night, I posted my thoughts on some of the moves made on Wednesday across the National Football League. You can check them out here if you happened to miss them. Let's take a step back now and look at some of the other transactions made leading up to Wednesday's action during the first week of NFL Free Agency.

Day 1 Moves (Friday March 5th)

Moves I Liked:

  • Good move by Indianapolis to re-up linebacker Gary Brackett to a 5-year deal that should keep him in a Colts uniform until he retires. Brackett is by no means a monster, but he's a great glue guy, a sure tackler and knows the defensive system the Colts like to run as well as anybody on their roster. The deal was a big one - $33 million with $12 upfront in the form of a signing bonus - but it wasn't a prohibitively massive contract.
  • Green Bay makes a move to ensure its offensive line is no worse than it was in 2009 by re-signing tackle Chad Clifton to a 3-year deal. Clifton was apparently not too far from working out a deal with the Washington Redskins. Clifton has started 63 of the past 64 games for Green Bay and has been with the team since 2000. The deal is worth $20 million, with $12 of that guaranteed. Seems like a lot of scratch for a guy who's made just one Pro Bowl '07), but you know what you're going to get from Clifton. Good character guy, durable as can be, and much better than one might think if you just look at Aaron Rodgers' sack totals the past two years. 
  • Detroit gets a bit tougher and more experienced on the defensive line by signing Kyle Vanden Bosch. KVB may be a bit long in the tooth at 31 years of age, and his production has declined substantially in recent years, but the deal is only worth $26 million over 4 years, with $10 million due to him in year number one. The Lions won't be too heavily invested after the first year, meaning they can reassess his value down the road. For now though, the move makes the Lions more formidable now without having to break the bank. He'll join Cory Williams in the new look Lions defensive line. Now, what to do about that shoddy secondary??

Moves I Disliked:

  • Talk about desperation time in the Windy City. Julius Peppers for 6 years and $42 million in guaranteed money? For a guy that takes plays off? For a guy that has never once played in a cold weather climate? I don't like it at all. Then paying Chester Taylor $12.5 million over 4 years at the age of 31? What exactly is he going to do that some undrafted free agent or late round draft pick can't do playing behind Matt Forte

Day 2 Moves (Saturday March 6th)

Star-divide

Moves I Liked:

  • None really, though I suppose it was important for the New England Patriots to work something out long term with NT Vince Wilfork. I thought they paid him too much in guaranteed money though ($25 million). Risky proposition for a guy who could very easily go from dominant to out of shape and overweight.

Moves I Disliked:

  • I guess the Atlanta Falcons haven't learned their lesson when it comes to overpaying for cornerbacks. First it was D'Angelo Hall several years back, now it's former Texans CB Dunta Robinson, who inked a 6-year $57 million dollar deal on Saturday. Robinson's a good player, don't get me wrong. And he's durable. But he's not that special of a talent. I suppose there's a high premium placed on pass defense in the NFC South with Drew Brees and the Saints hitting their stride, but I have a hard time being pleased about this one if I'm a Falcons faithful.

 

Day 3 Moves (Sunday March 7th)

Moves I Liked:

  • Great move by the Jacksonville Jaguars signing former Green Bay Packers DL Aaron Kampan. The deal was reasonable (4 years, $26 million, $11 guaranteed) for a guy who's only missed one game since 2004. He's racked up 48 sacks in that span. Jacksonville had an amazingly paltry total of just 14 sacks in '09. Kampman should help elevate that number considerably.

Moves I Disliked:

  • None, as it wasn't a very active day for obvious reasons. Though I will say that I don't think adding Scott Fujita and Tony Pashos makes Cleveland all that much more formidable. Both are nice players and good people. But I think Pashos is in particular was made to look better than he really is by Brees' ability to get rid of the ball quickly. Will Pashos be able to provide enough time for whichever unproven signal caller is under center in Cleveland next year? 

 

Day 4 Moves (Monday March 8th)

Moves I Liked:

  • Defensive tackle Fred Robbins may be set to turn 33 years old later this month, but his production has remained quite steady in recent years while a member of the New York Giants. His numbers dipped last year, but that may be a product of the Giants working in a new defensive scheme, and of course, it's never easy to come off of microfracture surgery. But Robbins is healthy now and he'll be reunited with former defensive coach Steve Spagnuolo in St. Louis. The Rams signed Robbins to an incentive laden 3-year deal that could be worth as much as $12 million. It's a nice gamble for a team that sorely needed to add bodies this offseason.
  • The Philadelphia Eagles locked down restricted free agent wide receiver Jason Avant to a 5-year deal that could be worth as much as $18 million. $8 mil is guaranteed, but that's not huge money considering the length of the deal and the fact that Avant's production has climbed slowly but surely each and every year since entering the league in 2006. Finally, the Eagles seem to have a set corps of playmakers locked down for the forseeable future. Desean Jackson, Jeremy Macklin, Avant, and TE Brent Celek should make Philly one of the more formidable offenses in the NFC next year.

Moves I Disliked:

  • Not too thrilled about either the Will Allen or the Arnez Battle signings by the Pittsburgh Steelers on Monday. More on them from me sometime soon, but they seem a bit hard to comprehend considering the moves made by the organization the following day - those being re-signing Ryan Clark and bringing back Antwaan Randle El to the Burgh after a three year hiatus following Super Bowl XL. I will say though now that I like Allen's potential to have an impact much, much more than Battle's. I don't see how he gets out of camp whereas I could very easily see Allen playing an important role as a nickel back.
  • Kansas City wastes their time and money on journeyman WR Chris Chambers. I'm not sure of the terms but I'm sure it's not a huge contract. Still, I see no use in bringing back a guy with a limited ceiling like Chambers at this point in his career, not to mention at this point in the KC rebuilding process. 

 

Day 4 Moves (Tuesday March 9th)

Moves I Liked:

  • Really liked Denver's acquisition of DT Jamal Williams. The former Charger hole clogger was given a 3-year $16 million dollar deal, $8 million of which is guaranteed. Williams may be 34 years of age during the 2010 season, but he'll still give the Broncos so much needed beef up front next year and in 2011. Denver was simply overwhelmed in the trenches last year and that eventually took its toll down the stretch. Nice move by Denver, as they finally get a little bit of toughness on defense.
  • Ryan Clark's return to Pittsburgh. Like I said in the case of bringing back Casey Hampton, I think keeping Clark around in 2010 and 2011 is a wise move as the team tries to make a run back to the Super Bowl. Doing so with an unproven young S would have been much, much tougher to accomplish.

Moves I Disliked:

  • Back to Kansas City. This time for commentary on the signing of veteran running back Thomas Jones to a 2-year $5 million dollar deal. He'll split carries presumably with 2009 breakthrough 'back Jamal Charles. This is why I don't like the move at all - Charles is an absolute stud. As good as Chris Johnson was in Tennessee last year, Charles was arguably better. He just didn't get his chance to shine until the Chiefs finally ditched trouble maker Larry Johnson. I understand the need to rotate in two RBs in today's game, but I can already see it - KC is going to limit Charles' effectiveness by sluffing off too many carries to Jones. That's going to hurt their explosiveness on offense, something they can't exactly afford to do considering their playmakers on the outside.

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I remember when Chambers caught that deep pass on us in KC for a TD. His ceiling was our secondary’s floor. “Baazing!”

Brian: Face it Peter, you get competitive about everything.
Peter: I am so not competitive. In fact, I am the least non-competitive. So I win.

by SoCalSteelerFan on Mar 11, 2010 6:11 PM EST reply actions  

Will Allen and Arnaz Battle

I’m not sure why you don’t like these. Will Allen replaces Tyrone Carter. That has to be an upgrade, last year’s Denver game nonwithstanding.

On the WR side, I think that Randle El and Battle replace Sweed and Logan. If this is the case, I think we lose little or nothing in the return game, I think Battle is clearly better than Logan in kick coverage, and our receiving corps just got a huge upgrade. Both El and Battle are experienced starting WRs, and if any of our WRs get hurt, even for a game or two, that experience will be valuable.

by Steelin on Mar 11, 2010 6:14 PM EST reply actions  

i agree with you on the randle el & will allen

it’s kinda crazy to think now that our #3 safety couldnt play special teams. seems like we are taking a commitment to signing players who will improve our special teams a ton, which is needed. allen is an upgrade from carter & randle el is an upgrade from sweed.

by t1mmy10 on Mar 11, 2010 6:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Return game

Not sure how you can say that Battle or Randle-El are anywhere close to Logan in the Return game.

Posted this elsewhere, but it should be repeated since people seem to think that the two 30 year olds offer us anything in the return game….

Of the 33 guys in the league last year who had 15 or more punt returns Randle El was 26th in AVG return at 6.0 yards a return.

Logan was 14th at 9.3.
Desean Jackson was first at a sick 15.3
Dead last at number 33 was a guy out of SF named Arnaz Battle who managed 2.9 a return.

By the way: In case you are wondering on kick-off Returns:
Logan was 7th in the league at 26.7 a return
Joshua Cribbs was 5th at 27.5
Neither AR-E nor Battle returned enough KOs to count in rankings.

by SteelerBuddha on Mar 11, 2010 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I like Logan

but since he played up in Canada I am probably biased towards him.

I may be old but I... oh d*mn, I forgot what I was going to say.

by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Mar 12, 2010 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Which Randel El?

The one we lost several years ago to Washington, or the older and slower one we just signed?

Absence makes the heart grow fonder, but is he better now? Probably not.

by gostevego on Mar 11, 2010 6:57 PM EST reply actions  

Better than Sweed

"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods

by Steel Spike on Mar 11, 2010 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Disagree about both KC signings.

First off, Jamal Charles is barely 200 pounds. You’re right that they are in a rebuilding process and it’d be pretty homerish to suggest that they will be contenders next year. Jones splitting the carries with Charles is a great way to keep him fresh and extend his career for when KC may have a better chance of winning.

Also, if you disagree with the Chambers signing, you must not have a clue about the WR situation in Kansas City. Sure Chamber’s stats may be lackluster, but they’ve got nothing else to take his place. Even if they draft someone they need him for depth. Bowe is a decent enough player, but he has been inconsistant. From game one with the chiefs Cassel and Chambers had a great connection.

Agree with everything else though.

"The dirtier the sound the best I breathe, I tried to do it all for you and you didn't do anything for me"

by Jux on Mar 11, 2010 7:06 PM EST reply actions  

id say go get torry holt

over chris chambers.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Mar 11, 2010 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

he'd at least show

the young guys how to work and prepare, whereas you never know with Chambers from day to day.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Mar 11, 2010 7:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I wouldn't mind that either

But even after keeping Chambers and drafting a prospect WR is still going to be a position of need.

Chambers has been great since he left San Diego at least

"The dirtier the sound the best I breathe, I tried to do it all for you and you didn't do anything for me"

by Jux on Mar 11, 2010 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

completely disagree with the thomas jones take but agree with the NT's & LB's

i wish we signed jones for that amount. moore is gonna be a 1.9 mil “cap” hit, yet jones has had 5 straight 1000+ yard seasons & will avg a 2.5 cap hit/year. and i’m not sold on charles yet. he had some good games at the end of last season but look at the teams he had them against. except for the bengals, they were some of the worse rushing defenses in the league. granted someone could argue that’s pretty much all he was playing against. but if you take away his longest run in most of those games he only had an avg running back performance. it’s great he was able to break so many long runs but it’s no coincidence he only did it against bad rush defense teams.

plus alternating backs is the way to go now. who else would they use with charles? kolby smith was the next best back on their team.

by t1mmy10 on Mar 11, 2010 7:13 PM EST reply actions  

ive been watching charles for many years

Guy’s a freak. His balance is amazing and he goes from first to fifth gear in a split second. He totally dusted Stefan Logan on that kick return. Totally left him in the dust. He’s special.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Mar 11, 2010 7:48 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

That’s why I’m pro-extend his career

"The dirtier the sound the best I breathe, I tried to do it all for you and you didn't do anything for me"

by Jux on Mar 11, 2010 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

i hear ya brother

He can’t be a 25 carry back every week, but he needs to get closet to 300 carries next year. I see Jones standing in the way of that.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Mar 11, 2010 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

i am just going from the stats & fantasy football experience so i have to concede to you there

but wouldn’t jones then be huge if charles is only an 18 carries a game back instead of “getting in his way?” as much as the team wants to look to cassel to get stuff done, he only has bowe to throw to (except when playing against the steelers minus troy).

by t1mmy10 on Mar 11, 2010 11:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Thomas Jones

is more of a battering ram who knows how to hit holes. He is a work out warrior with a positive influence in a locker room. That said, he needs someone to open the holes and I, iirc, KC doesn’t have an o-line that is anywhere near the Jets in terms of effectiveness.. It is an interesting signing in that TJ is not what I think of as a typical 3rd down back so what he is providing is depth behind the starter so Charles can take a breather and as a positive influence in the locker room. If that is what was wanted then he is a good add.

I may be old but I... oh d*mn, I forgot what I was going to say.

by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Mar 12, 2010 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

i agree

jones will be an alternating series & only play early series.

i can see a great situation where they use jones more earlier in the game to tire-out/soften up the defense & then use the quicker charles more to break more runs.

i just can’t see charles having a long career if he has to go through a couple of 300+ carry seasons. just doesnt seem built for it.

by t1mmy10 on Mar 13, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

What else was Chicago going to do?

They have no picks on the first day. And if you look at their roster it’s not like they’ve exactly lit it up in the draft over the last few years.

They had to do what they had to do. If Lovie Smith has another down year he’s gone. They still didn’t solve their biggest problem though, which was the offensive line. The Bears couldn’t run the ball at all last season and it put too much pressure on Cutler to make something happen, and we all know how that turned out.

They should’ve signed Antonio Bryant too. They might go after T.O., although I’m not sure how that lockeroom can take both of those egos for an entire season.

by StoneColdSteel on Mar 11, 2010 7:26 PM EST reply actions  

agree

With no picks in the 1st or 2nd round, Chicago had no choice. If they don’t at least make the playoffs this year not only is the coach (Lovie Smith) gone, the GM is gone as well.

As for the Peppers signing, I guess the best take on it is: time will tell. When the Pats signed Randy Moss, all the supposed experts said the same thing about him: he takes plays off, he doesn’t give full effort, etc, etc. No doubt Peppers is a boom-or-bust gamble but that’s probably a risk you have to take; the Bears are committed to the Cover-2 and as anyone who knows football can tell you, in a Cover-2 you absolutely, positively need DE’s who can pressure the QB even when you’re rushing just 4. The current Bears DE’s have demonstrated over the last couple of years that they are incapable of doing that. A Cover-2 team that is unable to get consistent pressure without blitzing is a team destined for serious defensive problems—as the Bears have shown quite clearly the last few seasons. So if you’re going to spend money, DE is the position where you want to spend it. The Bears are taking the chance that the change of scenery will do for Peppers what moving to NE did for Moss. It’s a risk, but given the big picture, it’s a calculated risk.

Plus, in the last few days it has come out that there is an “out” clause in the contract after the 1st year. If the Bears aren’t happy with his performance, they can cut him and not owe another penney beyond the $20m he gets this year. The “3 years, $42 million guaranteed” is an injury guarantee, not a performance guarantee. So Chicago has a little more protection built in than the national media (at least) reported.

As for Taylor…meh. I do think he will help us, and probably be a good mentor for Forte. Whether he is worth $12m is another story.

by JohnPaul on Mar 12, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Battle and Allen

Disagree with Blitz on Allen. We needed depth and competition at the safety, with Troy being injury prone and Clark getting up there in age and Mundy being unproven. I like taking a guy who is ST ace to back up that spot, especially a guy who Coach T. knows.

As for Battle – I remain puzzled by the fact that we added two WR’s as opposed to one. I think either signing was a good idea on it’s own. The two together aren’t exactly a disaster, but with AR-E coming in Battle seems suddenly expandable. The only thing he has going in his favor is that he also plays ST and was coached there by our new ST coach Al Everset, so there must be some love.

As I posted above, I don’t think either guy is going to help at all in the Return game and AR-E has already made it clear that he has no interest in doing so.

by SteelerBuddha on Mar 11, 2010 7:44 PM EST reply actions  

i agree that none of these guys as good as logan right now at returning

randle el replaces sweed

battle replaces grisham/mcdonald/galloway—-not only will he be our 5th wr, but he also can play special teams which those other guys werent big contributors on

will allen replaces carter & contributes on special teams (which carter wasnt a major contributor on)

and everyone’s happy

by t1mmy10 on Mar 11, 2010 11:21 PM EST up reply actions  

liking the feedback though

Thanks y’all.

Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)

by Michael Bean on Mar 11, 2010 7:49 PM EST reply actions  

Re: Signing Battle, Allen and Randle El

The Steelers aren’t setting their final roster in March. We may end up with more than 7 picks in what could be an exceptionally deep draft. I suspect that the team is going to pick up some promising young players, then have a real competition in training camp this year. I wouldn’t rule out the possibility that one or all of the recently signed players, with the exception of Ryan Clark obviously, could be beaten out in camp and let go.

by harrybeastfeet on Mar 11, 2010 10:57 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

284942_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo