Making Sense of the Pittsburgh Steelers Linebacker Situation
While reading some of the commentary provided by you all here on Behind the Steel Curtain recently, I had several fresh thoughts about the linebacker situation for the Pittsburgh Steelers. There's not a whole lot to assess personnel wise at the outside linebacker position. 2008 Defensive Player of the Year James Harrison and third year sensation LaMarr Woodley have the two outside 'backer positions locked down for at least the next two or three years.
It's the inside linebacker position in Dick LeBeau's 3-4 defense that I've been contemplating since the Steelers brought back Larry Foote to Pittsburgh after his one year stay over in Detroit.
The following is an excerpt from a very informative and well organized article about the Green Bay Packers 3-4 defense under recently hired defensive coordinator Dom Capers. In case you had forgotten, Capers was the architect of the Steelers defenses from 1992 until 1994 before being lured away by the Carolina Panthers to be the head coach for their inaugural season in 1995. Dick LeBeau was the defensive backs coach during Capers three years in Pittsburgh, so suffice it to say, much of what this article covers regarding Capers' 3-4 scheme in Green Bay is transferable to what the Steelers do defensively under Coach LeBeau.
The entire article is worth reading, but the excerpt I was compelled to share here is about the two inside linebacker positions in the 3-4 (bold emphasis mine):
There are two distinctly different ILB positions, the SILB and WILB, strong and weak. In Dom's system the SILB is named the buck, the WILB is named the mack. Unlike the OLB's, the ILB's do change sides based on which side the TE is on, with good reason. Usually if there is an uncovered gap or extra blocker, it is on the strong side. When looking at number counts, especially when a FB is involved, there are almost always as many blockers on the strong side as there are defenders. The buck and mack have very different skill sets as it relates to the run.
The buck is a banger. Remember one of the initial premises I made, a back with no blockers isn't going very far. The buck eliminates the blockers. If there is a G coming through, mix it up with the G and try to keep him in the gap. If the FB is coming through, stop him in his tracks. The last thing you want the buck doing is shedding the blocks, unless the RB is past or nearly past him. If he sheds the blocks early and fails to tackle the back, he made matters worse, now these blockers are in the secondary, the plus one has a blocker coming his way. Not good. The buck is supposed to engage blockers, not run around them.
If the buck has to take care of an offensive lineman, the best you can hope for is that he holds him up in the gap and doesn't get blown backward or thrown to the ground. Likewise he should hit the FB back and maintain control of the gap. The buck is essentially a small mobile defensive lineman, as it relates to the run, he almost always is part of the gap control scheme and has a gap assigned to him. He did his job if the back has to look elsewhere for an opening and if there are no blockers out in front of him.
The mack is the playmaker. He often has no gap assigned to him. He is to seek and destroy the guy with the ball. If the rest of the front did their jobs, he should be free of blockers. If not, he should shed any block immediately or go around them in pursuit of the ball. The mack is the star of the defense. He should always be around the ball. If he is blocked, the secondary has to make the play.
Okay, now, some of my thoughts about the Steelers inside linebacker situation. First though, some of the pertinent questions.
- Why hasn't Lawrence Timmons developed into the monster that we all thought he would be by now heading into his fourth year?
- How much does James Farrior have left in the tank at 34 years of age?
- How will defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau utilize the trio of Farrior, Larry Foote and Timmons? (and really, I should say the quartet and add Keyaron Fox, as he's proven plenty capable of playing at a starting level when given the opportunity).
319 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
well said
I think steelerbuddha was making this point in some comments on Footeʻs return, but you have clarified and elaborated those thoughts very nicely here.
I am very excited for Foote to be bashing some heads this season.
yup
I tried to allude to that in the intro of the post, but it was indeed Buddah’s comment in a previous thread that spurred me to write.
I just don’t think Timmons is a banger. I think he can be, and he will be asked to at time in the future. But I think this move frees him up more so than was the case in ’09.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Mar 23, 2010 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions
+1
Great read! Great research, great insight. Bang up job, mate! I’m also a believer that Timmons was not at his best playing the Buck last year. With one more year under his belt he should be capable of handling Mack duties if need arises, though, and we all know how good he is in the subpackages. I really believe he’s Farrior successor; his skill set is more suited for the Mack but until now he just wasn’t savvy enough to handle the job’s responsibilities. Of course with Farrior the bar was set pretty high… But now, with Foote back, all the options are at Coach Dad’s disposal. I AM excited!!!
Consider it unleashed!
thanks
it’s not very well written actually (just re-read it). Took a few days to put it together and some of the writing is disjointed as a result. But yeah, I’m with you and your thoughts exactly.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Mar 23, 2010 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Woodley
I also think there is a chance they let Woodley go after this year. The draft is loaded with 3-4 OLB types. Also, I think we’re not going to be able to resign Woodley, Holmes and Colon. Unfortunately I think Colon and Holmes might be harder to replace than Woodley.
I think
You are smoking crack.
Out of those 3, Woodley is easily the most important and hardest to replace. I believe the Steelers realize this and intend to pay the man. Deebo is not getting any younger but Woodley may have his best days ahead of him.
As for Holmes, I love the guy but we all know he is going to want huge money. He is our most explosive receiver but lets face it… The guy drops a lot of catchable balls. Not to mention his love for the ganja. Hope he sticks around but I could see him leaving before Woodley.
As for Colon, let him walk for all I care. He sucks. Seems like he gets at least one false start per game and our running game hasn’t done anything with him at tackle. Very replaceable IMO.
by RoethlisCrosby on Mar 23, 2010 7:32 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Woodley is DEFINITELY the hardest of the 3 to replace.
Coverting college DE’s to pro 3-4 OLB’s is really hard. As well as the Steelers draft, think about how many times they’ve missed trying to do this. Steven Conley, Alonzo Jackson, the Adibi kid from Virginia Tech. I’m sure there are others I’m missing. ‘Tone is a true #1 receiver, and that’s hard to find, but I don’t think Mike Wallace will end up being too far behind him once he matures. What do we have in house to step in for Woodley? Nada, that’s what. He’s a must-sign, franchise-type defender.
"Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and to fads and to popular opinion." -- Jack Kerouac
by cliff harris is still a punk! on Mar 23, 2010 7:58 AM EDT up reply actions
amen to both of you
put down the crack pipe guapo
by TheCincinnatiConqueror on Mar 23, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Nathaniel Adibi
Who’s brother Xavier, has proved to be a good LB in Houston.
"One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preperation."
-Arthur Ashe
by NYSteelersFan4 on Mar 23, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I forgot Bruce Davis
How could I forget Bruce? Actually, it was pretty easy to…
"Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and to fads and to popular opinion." -- Jack Kerouac
by cliff harris is still a punk! on Mar 23, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Colon sucks?
Someone has been a Steeler fan for very long.
by StoneColdSteel on Mar 23, 2010 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions
My colon doesn't suck...
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
it blows
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
by PixburghArn on Mar 23, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't envision them "letting go" of Woodley...
But I don’t necessarily see him staying either. It’s going to be difficult, one way or another.
With the number of teams switching to the 3-4, a pass rusher of Woodley’s calibre could garner heavy interest in the free agent market. Saying he may not be here next year is not totally impossible, if anything I question your wording guapo. If he get’s offered a deal worth a ton of money, would we, better yet could we afford to match it, or at least make an offer that is competitive.
I think the what if’s about Woodley’s contract situation after next season are questions we should be asking, and a topic we should really take a closer look at and not just dismiss.
"One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preperation."
-Arthur Ashe
by NYSteelersFan4 on Mar 23, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Truth
I agree with your perspective. I don’t think that the Steelers will simply just say, “Goodbye Woodley!” And I do not think resigning him will be as easy as slicing up pie.
A lot of interesting things could play into Woodley’s FA. With the CBA or lack there of, teams may be able to throw a ton of money his way. If the Steelers cannot get some sort of deal with him I assume he will get the highest tender (he can be, right?). Also, what is the window for RFA’s next year? Moreover, if there is no football next year, what happens with Woodley the next season? At that point…I wonder what other big FA LB names there will be out there.
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Even if we tender Woodley....
I could see another team giving up a first rounder for a proven pro-bowl commodity in his prime. Even if we franchised him, I could see a team giving up a first and second rounder for him, not likely.
I think Green Bay would be very dangerous with a LaMarr Woodley.
"Damnit mom! You almost ran over Greg Lloyd!"
at an autograph signing back in 95. He walked out in front of our minivan, and my mom almost hit him. He apologized.
by PA ARMY OFFICER on Mar 23, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions
It’d be interesting which team grabs him then. If we got two first round picks and one was real early? That’s dangerous.
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
That's dangerous
if they don’t get a rookie pay scale it would be… for us.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Could be
Or we could trade a first round pick for 2 seconds…
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions
UFA vs RFA
I believe that without a CBA, a player would have to have accrued at least 6 years to become eligible for UFA, otherwise he would be an RFA. If the Steelers put a high tender on Woodley (1st round) and a team offers him more, the Steelers have the ability to match the offer or get a 1st round pick in return from the other team.
With the CBA in place, the minimum accrued time was just 4 years, that is why we were able to tender Willie Colon this year as a RFA even though he has played 4 years.
No way!
The only way they let Wood go is if he is asking a ridiculous amount (which is possible). Anybody on the OL can be replaced and I could see Wallace becoming more valuable than Holmes. Wallace is hungry and Holmes has already been there, done that. LaMarr is way more valuable and harder to replace than Tone and / or Colon.
Very enlightening article Mike;
It cleared up some LB misconceptions for me and I am sure any others who take the time to read it carefully. Thank You.
The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.
Good stuff
Yeah, it certainly seems Timmons at the Mack would be much more effective for him.
by SteelerMessican on Mar 23, 2010 6:41 AM EDT reply actions
Nice job, Blitz. Very well done
Timmons reminds me of Kendrell Bell some in that his game is predicated on speed and explosiveness and less so on being the banger that Larry Foote is. And yes, I definitely see the staff working him in more and more at the Mack. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if he takes over the Mack from Farrior at some point in the season — maybe not as the official starter but in terms of the number of snaps.
And yes, I’m very excited to see him play there. :)
"Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and to fads and to popular opinion." -- Jack Kerouac
by cliff harris is still a punk! on Mar 23, 2010 7:52 AM EDT reply actions
Foote and Timmons to start at ILB
By the 3rd game or so (if not earlier) it will be obvious that Farrior continues to loose it. Farrior was a great ILB who did not get his due because he did not make the highlight hits. But he was beat on passing plays and run over on running plays.
Your article was very informative. I think the right move is to move Timmons to Mack and start Foote at Buck and draft an eventual replacement for the Buck in the 3rd or 4th round.
They still need an eventual replacement for Harrison. He is playing well, but age will catch up at some point. But for now Harrison – Will, Timmons – Mack, Foote – Buck and Woodely – Sam is a great LB quartet.
by Steeler Nation VA on Mar 23, 2010 8:52 AM EDT reply actions
"eventual replacement for the Buck..."
.
Would you happen to have a vote on whom we might target for that? Myself, for a strictly buck backer, Spikes looks awesome. Problem is, you still have to have a little speed to actually get in position to engage a blocker. And he may not be available in the third or fourth….
"Believe you can and you're halfway there." TR
by Concomitandt on Mar 23, 2010 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Sean Lee would be an EXCELLENT buck LB
He had a pretty good pro day. Ran the 40 in the high 4.5s.
Odrick did really well too, ran in the low 4.9s and looked great in the drills.
by SteelerMessican on Mar 23, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I love Sean Lee
… but, to me, he seems to lack the size needed to be be a buck, and rather, given his range as a playmaker could be a decent mack.
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
He's the same size as Larry Foote
Heres what Kevin Weidl of Scouts Inc. posted on ESPN Insider
“Lee is a different player than Bowman, more of a downhill run-stopper who can take on blocks, and thanks to his smarts and instincts, he is working his way into second-round consideration. "
by SteelerMessican on Mar 23, 2010 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Understandable
I guess, and I might be restricting to myself to ‘impact moments’, I am basing this on watching Sean Lee extensively over the past three years. He is very good at attacking the line and making contact in the backfield with a runner. Granted at PSU, he played OLB in a 4-3, and I do not have a scout’s mindset on how he would transition, but he tended to shed blocks and attack the RB rather than hold them up for others to make the play.
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
he would probably need to add a few pounds
That may help him fill the BUCK.
by SteelerMessican on Mar 24, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
How old Fox?
Could he maybe a year or so down the line move into the buck starting role with Timmons sliding over to the Mack? I would love seeing that combo in the middle. I think Fox is plenty capable of starting for a few years.
Back when Larry Foote left several of us stated we thought that while Timmons is a better player than Foote that run defense would suffer with Timmons in Foote’s place. I honestly though Fox did better at the Buck than Timmons.
I’m hoping this year to see a lot of Foote, and to see Timmons sliding over to the Mack or blitzing from outside. Foote is one of the better Buck LB’s we’ve had in a while, right up there with Earl Holmes, and that is saying a lot.
I’d love to see Timmons start pushing Farrior at the Mack, simply because that is tough to do, Farrior is big time leader out there, and if Timmons can start to fill that role a bit I would be thrilled.
As for people talking about Woodley, let’s compare some Steeler LB’s and how long it took them to get to about the same number of sacks.
Woodley: 29 sacks, 44 games, 3 years
Gildon: 28 sacks, 76 games 5 years
Lloyd: 26.5 sacks, 72 games, 5 years
Porter: 30.5 sacks, 63 games, 4 years
C. Brown 30 sacks, 56 games, 4 years
K. Greene: 30 sacks, 56 games, 4 years.
Those aren’t shabby players, and they aren’t easily replaced. Woodley is outproducing all of them.
I know he has Harrison across from him, but Porter had Gildon, Gildon had C. Brown, most of the guys had someone on the other side.
Some other names that aren’t Steelers:
Micheal Strahan: 32 sacks, 71 games, 5 years
Lawrence Taylor: 27 sacks, 57 games, 4 years.
Rickey Jackson: 28.5 sacks, 57 games, 4 years
And just to see Woodley lose to another LB:
Derrick Thomas: 30 sacks, 31 games, 2 years.
That’s pretty good company to be in. This is just sacks, and LT was by no means a pass rushing specialist, but Woodley is well rounded and no slouch in other areas either.
The point is Woodley is starting his career at a HoF pace, in fact take out LT’s 0 sack 16 start rookie year you get: 27 sacks, 41 games, 3 years. Yeah, that’s almost the same numbers Woodley has.
Woodley is an elite pass rusher, and a great 3-4 OLB. If we let him go it will be very bad. Especially since we have no one pushing him out the door to take his place. This is one man you pay the money to.
Agree 100%
Plus Woodley is playing on the strong side, not the weak side LB.
by Steeler Nation VA on Mar 23, 2010 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions
?
No, Woodley doesn’t play the “strong side”. It’s only the ILBs that switch sides based on the position of the opposing TE.
Derrick Thomas was a beast
probably the greatest passs rusher in NFL history off the edge. Not bad company for Wood
Lawrence Taylor?
I’ll be honest, I didn’t see either play in their primes, but LT is the name I hear most next to greatest edge rusher of all time. What seperates Derrick Thomas from LT, in your opinion?
"One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preperation."
-Arthur Ashe
by NYSteelersFan4 on Mar 23, 2010 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions
LT was the greatest LB ever, not the greatest pass rusher.
by Phantaskippy on Mar 23, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
thought LT played on the line
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Thoughts on Thomas and LT
Just one opinion, but I thought Thomas was quicker than LT and got to the edge faster. He would dip his shoulder to get beneath an OT and then cut the corner like a great race car. But he was pretty one dimensional. LT was by far the more complete player. LT could take a game over on defense the way an elite QB can do on offense. Not many defensive guys in the history of the game you can say that about.
Oh, and LT was a 4-3 outside backer. Thomas played mostly in a 3-4. So different responsibilities of course…
"Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and to fads and to popular opinion." -- Jack Kerouac
by cliff harris is still a punk! on Mar 23, 2010 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions
I hope Lambert reads BTSC
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
Adam Lambert?
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Can you say with complete certainty that Lambert was even the best Linebacker named Jack on his own team?
by Phantaskippy on Mar 23, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Again
If Lambert read that, treat you like James Harrison treats random Cleveland fans.
Ham on the other hand would just smile.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
i would never compare the two
as they were part of the best trio of linebackers I can remember.
I may be old but I... oh d*mn, I forgot what I was going to say.
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Mar 23, 2010 7:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Lambert wouldn’t care, he’s a nice guy.
by Phantaskippy on Mar 24, 2010 3:04 AM EDT up reply actions
A:
Lawrence Taylor was a very very very good olb in a 3-4 scheme and more complete LB. Although he primarily stood up and rushed the QB from the edge. The fact that he played in New York for the Parcells Giants did not hurt his name sake either. He was surrounded by great defensive players like Pepper Johnson, Carl Banks, Leonard Marshall, and Harry Carson. He changed the way the game was played and was the first dominant LB pass rushers of the edge. One of the greatest ever.
Derrick Thomas was just as good if not better at rushing the QB. Let’s not forget the fact that his career was cut short by trajick car accident in which he died a few weeks later. When it came to getting after the QB I don’t remember any player in history that did it more often. I still remember his 7 sack game against Seattle and his 27 sacks his senior year at Bama. He invented the “gregg lloyd tomahawk chop”. I believe he still holds the NFL record for forced fumbles.
When it comes down to it I still say DT greatest off t edge that I have ever saw. LT was good but if I had to pick one player from my lifetime in a do or die situation to get to the QB, my choice would be DT
nice stats
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Mar 23, 2010 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Woodley's worth isn't limited to just pass rushing
He’s even more impressive against the run.
by StoneColdSteel on Mar 23, 2010 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions
His pass coverage is coming along as well
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
He got playing time his first year because he was doing so well against the run and in coverage.
by Phantaskippy on Mar 23, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Woodley is solid against the run and is shaping into being pretty good at covering. He isn’t “more” impressive at either of those than he is at rushing the passer though.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
Also those last year stats are a little down because of Woodley was overweight.
And I really think that Woodley will be the first that the FO will re-sign, then Santonio, and in this draft look for another OL player.
Great read Blitz.
O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.
by YeOldeMexFan on Mar 23, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
great article
thanks
I may be old but I... oh d*mn, I forgot what I was going to say.
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Mar 23, 2010 9:15 AM EDT reply actions
Good Job MB
I think Foote is insurance. I don’t see him supplanting Farrior or Timmons. The Steelers could be gearing up to take a LB at #1 in whuch case Foote will have a hard time getting a helmet on game day.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
I am so happy you mentioned Fox!! He is a great starter, always puts himself out there, and honestly he and Farrior make a great combo! I really hope to see more of him, and I am always keeping my eye out for a 57 jersey!
"God blessed me with the talent I have." - Deebo
I think someone's got a crush.
"One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preperation."
-Arthur Ashe
by NYSteelersFan4 on Mar 23, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
speed
In this age of short pass happy offenses, you need middle linebackers with the speed to cover backs or at least make a tackle before they catch and run to convert a fourth down. Yes, you need to stop the run and Foote is a nice addition for that purpose. With fourth quarter leads and passing situations, Foote and Farrior should not be on the field. Steelers need Timmons and another player to run around making hits and plays on those underneath routes. Rolando McClain is a likely 3 down LB the Steelers need or a safety/LB guy like Taylor Mays running around underneath making plays would be fun to watch. I’m not a big fan of using a #1 on a guy like Mays who’s proven he’s a bad safety and won’t play on all downs, but the Steelers desperately need someone big and fast to stop those short passes…that might be a perfect role.
Great article Blitz.
Agreed
McClain would be ideal but do you trade up for him or let him fall to you if he does.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions
McClain
I like his skill set and think he would be a great fit, it’s just the Crone’s Disease thing scares me. I think if he falls to 18 it would be ok to take him. Trading up is to risky IMO. There will be others later in the draft and in the coming seasons. This season, with the signing of Foote, I think we are ok at MLB. Timmons can always slide over to Mack and Fox is plenty capable of starting at Buck if need be. I’d like to see us take Earl Thomas or an OL.
How many more years does Foote have left?
I don’t know, I’m asking. Then Fox isn’t too far behind him.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 24, 2010 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Troy takes care of the underneath routes
we need a safety to take a way the deep pass.
I'm getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
by Steel in FL on Mar 23, 2010 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions
You can get a competent
Safety in round 2. Also Troy takes care of everything, deep, short, middle, left, right.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Picture someone like Earl Thomas Morgan Burnett or Nate Allen next to Troy
Now imagine trying to throw on a secondary like that.
I'm getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
I see a brick wall
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Woodley is number 1
Thanks to skippy I don’t have to do much research. This guy is my older twin good work phantaskippy woodley is gonna be one of the best LBs of all time
by celtsfan1 on Mar 23, 2010 9:49 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Not until he learns to cover...
But he could be one of the greatest pass rushers, some day.
"One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preperation."
-Arthur Ashe
by NYSteelersFan4 on Mar 23, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Plus, I heard he played corner in pee-wee football...
"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods
Jerome Bettis and Marcus Allen
played offensive line in pee wee football……
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
I would like to see them pay
Holmes (if its not CRAZY money) and Woodley. If Colon can be signed, great…if not I would think he would be the easier of the 3 to replace. I am looking forward to seeing our D this year. With a healthy Troy and Smith back and Foote back in the mix, we should be back to being dominant again. The front 7 should help the secondary a lot, and I am looking forward to seeing more of our young corners.
by SteelersFnRule on Mar 23, 2010 10:07 AM EDT reply actions
Particulary if the Steelers end up drafting
Iupati at #18. He allegedly can play G or T.
Have to say Woodley is the most important to resign and its not even close. Looking at those stats above, its not a stretch to say that we are witnessing a unique and potential HOF career. That man is a terror. It also appears that his leadership skills are advancing, as I have seen him become more vocal both on and off the field. Unlike Holmes, he has no personal strikes against him and, if he can remain that way, he along with Troy will be the clear leaders of this D for several years to come.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions
don't lose hope
I for one would like to reserve judgement and see Timmons healthy a whole season behind Snack and a healthy Smith with the full playbook in his head. Remember we haven’t really seen that yet. I’ll bet he’ll open some eyes into exactly how freakishly good he really is. This may be the best group of backers the burgh has ever had and Timmons still may be the stud of the group.
by masterblastor on Mar 23, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree
Woodley hasn’t even begun to hit his stride yet. With the pace he is on the HOF is a very high possibility. Cant let a guy like that just walk. Pay him, he deserves it, he is young, he’s a big ass OLB and he will only get better. I remember when we drafted him, I was watching his highlight reel on youtube, drooling at how dominate he was. You could tell he was going to be great. That was very exciting getting him, more so than Timmons. Dudes an animal and irreplaceable. Pay Him!
Nice article Blitz
I am just starting to learn a good deal about the Xs and Os…at least on defense. The Mack and the Buck is a new concept that Buddha pointed to the other day and I have been thinking about since. Foote’s return really excites me when you consider how much Foote offers as a tremendous Buck player.
Anyway, I cannot remember much about Fox playing in Minni, but how was he as a Buck? Is he good at holding up blocks against OL and blowing up TEs or FBs? I do not see him as being a good Mack, but if he can block he would make a great Buck.
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
Fox played in KC
Not sure which Pos.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions
fox jumped in against minnesota cuz timmons got injured
he had a pick 6. then started against denver the following week.
i’m guessing he played the buck role since he was replacing timmons not farrior
Thanks Blitz
I get excited just reading about LB’s smashing people. Can we implement a 2-5?
Woodley, Foote, Fox, Farrior, Harrison
Flacco would pee himself
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Mar 23, 2010 11:04 AM EDT reply actions
Sitting Timmons? Not sure I’d do that.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
Agreed
He might change his position based on the subpackage, but he should be involved in each and every situation. One, it continues to help him develop. Two, and a more long-term concern, I would like to see him re-signed and his feeling that he would not get to be a full-time starter, assuming he has earned it, would be detrimental to that.
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
Dude
Have you seen Timmons bear down on a QB at 200 MPH. That’s what makes QBs pee themselves.
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
True that
I got caught up in Fox being viable depth at LB.
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Mar 24, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Don't get me wrong Fox is very good
And depth is a very good thing
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
by PixburghArn on Mar 24, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
As long as Flacco
pees himself
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Mar 24, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Great article Michael...
I just recently watched a video of a few coaches breaking down the ILB’s duties in a 3-4, and if I can find it, I’ll post a link. Very informative, it goes into even more depth about the responsibilites of each. Say it with me now, flex-a-bility.
"One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preperation."
-Arthur Ashe
by NYSteelersFan4 on Mar 23, 2010 11:09 AM EDT reply actions
Please do
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Don't sleep on Keyaron Fox, Holmes & Woodley are keepers
Out of the Steelers inside linebackers this past year, K. Fox was definitely the most violent on the field to me. He was a thumper in the games that he started (go back and watch the Tennessee game) and he generally played well. I might be of the minority, but I don’t think Farrior can play at a level that he previously did and is now a liability in pass coverage, so resigning Foote was a great move.
I know Guapo said he thinks the Steelers will let Woodley walk and try to go with some cheaper replacements in this draft. Hogwash, BABY! Woodley is the only player in NFL history to have multiple sack games in all his playoff starts and he hasn’t even entered his prime yet. The Steelers will resign him and Santonio Holmes. Both are Pro Bowl players and the Steelers don’t let the players that they really want to keep leave.
As far as Colon, I still don’t think he is anything special. He’s replaceable. I’m not sure the front office feels the same way, but we’ll soon find out.
Is anyone out there as stoked as I am about the 10 draft picks this year in such a deep draft? Not only that, but the Steelers are in a GREAT position to trade down a couple of slots, pick up an extra 3rd round and 6th round draft pick, and still get a good player in the first round (Iupati, Earl Thomas, K. Wilson, J. Odrick, M. Pouncey, B. Graham) and have the ammo to trade up in the 2nd round and get the player they want there as well (maybe NT Cam Thomas, CB Jerome Murphy, or OLB Jerry Hughes). I think Houston at 20 and New England at no. 22 are teams to watch who might want to move up.
Unless things change, I wouldn’t mind seeing the Steelers first two picks be:
1) CB/S Earl Thomas of Texas
2) NT Cam Thomas of UNC
by datruth4life on Mar 23, 2010 11:17 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Blitz, both Woodley and Timmons are babies ...
Their best is still ahead. I’d like to add a few more playmakers to this group, especially in the back 7, like E. Thomas or K. Wilson. This is also a good draft to groom a couple of baby Deebos in waiting, like OLB Eric Norwood from South Carolina.
By the way, anyone think Roger Goodell can convince Ben to not hold on to the ball so long and take less sacks during their conversation in New York? It’s worth a shot. He apparently ain’t listening to anyone else, so why not?
draft should be a good one
theyʻre set up to take just about any position they feel has value, and should be able to get some serious depth in lacking positions, d-line, secondary, o-line, OLB, or even ILB, if one is BPA.
One of the best posts ever
I always thought that way. Farrior was at 220lb and couldnt handle the buck, and Timmons is fast in space, so, shedding the blockers isnt his specialty. I think we will see a lot of Foote and Timmons this year. Farrior will be the leader, but he wont be all the time on the field.
first time commenter
First off I’d like to say I’m new to the blog but it is really good. Been looking for something comparable to the Pensblog level for Steelers info and this looks to be the site.
I’d like to say this article was a great read and I’d really look forward to hearing your thoughts on the return of antawn randle el and how he will fit in with our offense who seems to be set at the top 3 receiver positions. Think he’ll just play special teams and return to that “x-factor” role or will he acutally be able to beat out Mr 60 minutes? Great read keep up the good work.
Welcome to BTSC
There was a good article last week, I think, about Randle El’s return. Here is Blitz talking about the resign.
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Welcome Joe
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
by PixburghArn on Mar 23, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Welcome to our little community Joe.
"One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preperation."
-Arthur Ashe
by NYSteelersFan4 on Mar 23, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
welcome Joe!
you will learn to take the great posts with the somewhat unnecessary posts :)
"God blessed me with the talent I have." - Deebo
I have never seen an unecessary post on BTSC!
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
It's all relevant
How else would I know how to surf?
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I know I'm confused
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Mar 23, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions
confusion is a given sometimes
when it strikes just roll with it
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
or troll with it
which ever tickles your fancy
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions
[: |
JF
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
If all else fails just sit back and watch the waves go by.
by Phantaskippy on Mar 23, 2010 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions
ahhhh
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Latest mock draft by Pro Football Weekly
It has the Steelers taking C M. Pouncey at 18 and passing on CB Joe Haden, NT D. Williams, CB-S Earl Thomas and CB Joe Wilson.
http://www.profootballweekly.com/2010/03/15/sooners-could-make-history
As much as I think Pouncey
would be a great fit, I cannot see the Steelers grabbing a C at 18 with those others still on the board. But, WTF am I?
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
A wookie?
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions

"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
You get a haircut?
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Mar 23, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, but not anything you can see from this photo
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions
brazillian nut wax
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
by PixburghArn on Mar 23, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions
she wasn't brazillian
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions
but she was waxed poetically huh?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
PFW is on crack
if they think Steelers pass on Haden and D Williams.
by SteelerMessican on Mar 23, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I think going for the center is a gamble
but I could understand why they might, after letting Stapleton go unsigned.
Trading back to the early to mid 20s
might make more sense if the FO wants Pouncey. 18 is simply to early. I have heard rumors that Indy is after Pouncey, too so they’d have to be careful about that move, too. If the Steelers move off 18, Indy could easily make a move out in front of the Steelers before the dust settles. Then the gamble fails to pay off.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions
I like the idea of grabbing him
because he supposed be pretty intelligent and good at making line calls…if we are without Ben, that is going to be needed, and Hartwig is good but not great. Even with Ben, it would be good to get an outstanding center for after Hartwig
Cleveland took Alex Mack at 22 last year
Pouncey is supposed to be as good as him, if not better, and with the versatility to play multiple positions, which is something that I don’t think Mack has/had coming out of college. While Cleveland may not be the ideal organization to point to for a precedent, my point is that taking a Day 1 impact center before the last 4 picks is not unheard of, and it’s not like he’s a pure center either.
If it came down to Pouncey and Iupati at 18 – both of them the approximate size and shape and with the same mauling attitude of a grizzly bear – I’d personally vote for Pouncey if he can plug in at guard for a year or two then takeover for Hartwig and let Foster/Urbik/someone else step back in. I don’t think it’s necessarily a reach if the guy is a rock solid pick and there’s no guarantee he’d be there the next time you’re up – even if it may seem early from past trends. Trying to finesse more draft picks out of it by trading back is nice and all, but how many open spots are we going to have on this team anyways, especially following our little free agency signing spree?
by barnerburner on Mar 23, 2010 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Great point
and precisely why I prefer to trade up to 9 or 10 and grab McClain. I know this post is kinda all over the place thanks to certain threadjackers (lol) but I do mention that somewhere in here, I swear.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Haha
Yeah, I found that post lower down and am in the process of responding to that as well
by barnerburner on Mar 23, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t think I’m going to use cleveland as my measuring stick for what draft value is. By all accounts the steelers were fairly uninterested in Mack last year and not extremely high on Woods either. I can see them taking both, but if they are both available and no one else they want is then the opportunity to trade down is too great.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see them trade down in the first and then trade up out of the first round.
One thing we know about the steelers is that if they love a guy, they could give a crap about draft value and will trade just about anything to get them. Another thing is that if they really like a guy, they could give a crap about “draft value”.
It will come down to what the steelers think of these guys, and more importantly, as always, BPA on their draft board.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
Meant to say CB Kyle Wilson from Boise State
If they passed on those four for a center, I’d be sick.
That won't happen
Unless someone spectacular drops, expect the pick to be either CB or OL.
by StoneColdSteel on Mar 23, 2010 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Expect the pick to be
unexpected….
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
If you expect the pick to be unexpected then it would not really be unexpected
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
by PixburghArn on Mar 23, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Except if you weren't
expecting the pick to be unexpected
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
so we should not except the pick to be unexpected so that it will be?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
*expect
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
That is correct
and suddenly, expected doesn’t sound like a word anymore, I wasn’t expecting that.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions
No matter if we expect or not
an unexpected pick will have to be excepted. What a sad story if the unexpected became unexceptable. Even if it’s expected what we really want is to except it.
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
I think you mean accept it?
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
See you don't get it
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
expect...................accept=expected
expect…………………….except=unexpected
do you see an exception here?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
no - my head just exploded
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
I know
I was trying to play off the unexpected translation of accept. And the underlying feeling of some that what the exception to the rule and I did a bad job of it.
FAIL!
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Unacceptable
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
well
that was unexpected….
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
unfail!
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
I think that means
she likes us Arn :)
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
She says that but I know what that really means
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
failure?
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Mmmmmm
tacos .. .. ..
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions
our moms say so
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
It was worth a shot
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Great Stuff Blitz
Glad to see you flesh these things out! I am definitely curious to see how this plays out and what kind of rotation (if any) we see when all the guys are healthy.
As many have pointed out Coach Dad’s defense works because it creates unexpected pressure. The zone blitz is a great tool because you never know which of the 7 guys up front is attacking the QB and which is going to drop back into coverage.
I remember this point being hammered home last season when I saw all 330 360 lbs of Casey Hampton drop jiggle back into coverage on a RB or TE. Can’t remember the game, but I have a distinct memory of rolling around on the floor laughing.
What’s scarier is the play worked. The two Offensive Linemen upfront were left staring at the giant empty patch of grass where just a moment ago they had been double teaming Mt. Casey. All of the sudden the two were unemployed as swarm of linebackers, safeties corners etc. hit the the undermanned outside guys.
Just as often, we’ll see Deebo, Woodley, Smith or Keisel dropping back in coverage against a TE, RB or playing a zone against receivers.
For much of last year this just didn’t work as well as it did in years past. Obviously a huge part of that was that we were missing Smith and Troy.
I think another big part of it was that James Farrior began to slow down, especially late in games as our defense faced more pass plays.
I got curious to see if there was any proof of this, apart from my faulty memory. I found some <a href=“http:// ”http://www.footballoutsiders.com/player/15807/james-farrior" target="_blank">http://www.footballoutsiders.com/player/15807/james-farrior " >interesting stuff on football outsiders.
On the whole I find their stats rather confusing. I think even with their system it’s hard to account for all of the factors that come into play when ranking a defensive player in a team sport. For example what percentage of the Farrior’s statistical drop-off can be accounted for by not having Troy head-hunting behind him?
I don’t think there are good answers to that question, but I still found the stats to be interesting. They may hint at a slide in performance that many of us thought we saw while watching the games.
Farrior especially dropped off in the his stop rate and Yd/Play against the pass, where he went from a 55% stop rate in 2007 and 2008 to a 44% stop rate in 2009. He also gave up nearly 6.1 Yd/Play in 2009 against the pass as compared to 5.2 in 2008 and 3.8 in 2007.
Again, I don’t want to over-sell this stuff. There are smarter football minds out there who probably have a better sense of what all this means, and how to make sense of the footballoutsider stats.
Having said that, my gut instinct is that we will see Farrior take less snaps this year – especially in late game and passing situations. My hope is that we will see plenty of Foote and Fox on the field just to rotate and keep the other guys fresh, fast and furious.
the link
Here is the link to the football outsiders stats for James Farrior
by SteelerBuddha on Mar 23, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Hoping Farrior simply had a down year.
Combined with the glaring absence of two of the all time greats at their repective positions (T. Polamalu & A. Smith) and just about everybody in that D was made to look bad at some point or other. Offenses could pick on week spots where there had been none (or decidedly few) weaknesses in the past.
My guess is Farrior comes into camp at his prior playing weight and starts the season as the starter as usual. In the event that his play does not improve over the end of last season, we’ll begin to see some type of new rotation back there. In fact, Mack rotation is one of the things I plan to watch closely for during the preseason. That should give us some idea what LeBeau’s contingency plan is in the event Farrior has indeed lost his edge.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
+1
“360 lbs of Casey Hampton jiggle back into coverage”
by barnerburner on Mar 23, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
hows about
Great looking analysis
The thing that confuses me, though, is why no one seemed to think of this last year. Last year, everyone was talking like Timmons was an athletic young guy who was basically a faster replacement for Foote. It’s only now that I’m hearing constantly about his “natural” position being OLB, and him having a significantly different skill set than Foote as an ILB.
Minor nitpick: IIRC, Timmons started against Minnesota, and then was injured in the fourth quarter. I remember the people around me at the game being concerned, and then we got to see Fox step in and be in the right place to win the game for us…
by TheSpatulaMessiah on Mar 23, 2010 1:14 PM EDT reply actions
You were at that game, too?
What an ending! I remember being pissed off at the O (play calling in particular) all game long. The D really pulled that one out for the good guys. Also never forget the site/sound of B. Gay getting trucked by A.P.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Only Steelers home game I've ever been to
And the last one for the forseeable future, given that I’ll be doing a surgery rotation (let’s just say that those are not exactly known for giving students a lot of time off) next football season.
by TheSpatulaMessiah on Mar 23, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions
My nephew is a Pitt med grad
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Living in Chicago
But my family often puts together a pilgrimage back to the Burgh in October.
by TheSpatulaMessiah on Mar 24, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the only reason you didn’t hear anything about it last year is because you weren’t on BTSC.
You sure Ike isn’t reacquainting himself with his fingers, he certainly doesn’t use them for catching. - Brian (DaBolts) on "Face Me Ike"
Heh
But I was lurking and reading the site.
by TheSpatulaMessiah on Mar 24, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
This post
and the comments here are why I like to be here..quality info, insights, good argumentation…thanks Blitz
don't forget random threadjacking
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
After reading this I don't see the Steelers taking an ILB early.
Basically they are trying to replace Foote not Farrior, since that’s Timmons’ job. A first or second round LB to take on FB and G seems expensive.
Heck with 3 comp picks they may just take every ILB left after round 4 and let them slug it out in the preseason.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
Conclusions? Agreed
Fox and Foote are both under-rated. Lots of folks have been saying that Steelers should trade up for McClain (not on this post), but I don’t see it …. LB is team’s strongest group along with WR.
Does that mean OL, DL or DB in Rd 1? Or CJ Spiller? [If he’s there at #18, I take him. Sorry.]
With CB K. Wilson, you kill 5 birds with one stone ...
1) Starter at corner THIS year opposite Ike Taylor
2) Will actually make plays on the ball and not fall down like “lack of a play” Willie Gay
3) Possible no. 1 corner next year when you let Ike “stone hands” Taylor leave as a free agent
4) no. 1 punt returner this year (saves a roster spot, sorry Stefan Logan) if you feel comfortable with Mike Wallace returning kickoffs
5) You’d keep him from going to the Ravens, where you’d have to face him twice a year for the next decade.
And yes, that is one helluva large stone, LOL. You can even trade back a couple of slots, pick up a 3rd & 6th and still get Wilson. Just makes too much sense so it’ll never happen. Thoughts?
Who the hell would kill 1 bird with 1 stone
let alone go for a 5 for 1?
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd kill a Raven with a stone
I think Deebo once killed 11 cardinals with one stone…
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
The longest 18 sec in SB history.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
At least on Parkers run
after he cut right, about 8 yrds down field, we all knew he was gone. I’m pretty sure every Steelers fan pulled something during Harrisons return, just leaning and willing him into the EZ.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
falling down again & again
My God, never saw an NFL player fall down as much as SlipNFall Gay … every time the ball was in the air in his direction, this MTF was on his back.
Nice assessment though.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I like the idea
and I’m a front runner in the McClain train, if we can get a couple of extra picks to move up in rounds 2 and 3 i’m all for it.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Though the idea has lost popularity
I am still all for trading up to 10 or 11 to get McClain. McClain does not make it past NYG at 15. I think the FO and coaches are quite happy with last year’s draft & UFAs and with 10 additional picks unlikely to gain roster spots this year, I think the Steelers are in prime position to package a couple to move up without sacrificing a whole lot. McClain could be groomed to take over for Farrior and Timmons could be unleashed in any manner of creative ways that would best utilize his ridiculous athleticism until it is time to move him to the outside to replace Harrison (hopefully the way distant future).
My second choice is to stay put and hope Dan Williams is there at 18 and scoop him up.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
And I don't want to hear that this is not the Steeler's MO
When they have identified a stud that they want, they have gone after him. They did it with Troy and they did it with Santonio.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
I just wouldn't want to lose
a 2nd or 3rd trading up in the 1st, if there is a possiblity of McClain dropping I’d rather stay put and try to get him. McClain is still best suited for the 3-4 which the giants do not employ. So there is still a chance.
I never said its not the steelers’ MO, I don’t even know what MO stands for.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions
So trade up acceptable or the exception?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Its expected in this case.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I think to some it's excepted :)
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Well
I expect that if its expected it will be accepted and that isn’t an exception.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions
some aren't expecting nor are they willing to accept
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
those are
the exception
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions
OK you two
I already had to scrape my brains off the wall once!
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Except .. .. ..
oh, never mind
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Except that NO ONE expects
The Spanish Inquisition!!!
Torquemada is that you?!
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Hey Torquemada, whadda ya say?
I just got back from the Auto De Fe?
"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods
Torquemada?
All I know is that these silly robes really let the air flow around the Rocks of Gibraltar..
/…totally non-seqiotor but the best I could do on a moment’s notice.
another great movie from Mel Brooks
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Auto De Fe?
Whats an Auto De Fe?
It’s what you oughtn’t to do, but you do anyway!
"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods
by Steel Spike on Mar 24, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions
With all the picks they have
it might even be possible to trade back into the 2nd or 3rd.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
as Mythbusters would say
plausible…. :)
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions
I told my wife
if I ever meet Kari, there could be a problem.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions
she is every nerd's dream
not sayin that you are a nerd.. cough cough :) I don’t think chewies can be nerds….
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
cricket .. .. .. cricket .. .. ..
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
tough crowd
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions
bad joke
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Dude, a few years ago, I used to have very sexy dreams about Kari Byron...
Even though she is a vegetarian. That’s just one stupidly hot chick.
"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods
Oh, my wording was a bit harsh on that one
didn’t mean I didn’t want to hear it from you specifically.
MO is modus operandi or method of operating.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Cool
Learn something everyday. I honestly thin McClain would be awesome at the Buck position in our Defense. He is big enough and strong enough to take on blockers and still make plays. He is fast enough to not be a liability in coverage either. There have been people who compare him to Patrick Willis or Ray lewis type player. There are others that wondering why is stock is so high. From what I gather he was a coach on the field, that is nothing but good news. A head for the game with the athletic ability to back it up. He isn’t an athletic freak like Timmons but will be awesome in our buck position.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions
The mean guy of the 3 Stooges.
Also Billy Idol’s favorite Stooge.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
McClain may be there at no. 18
Who knows? Stranger things have happened.
by datruth4life on Mar 23, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I would be doing back flips my friend.
I can’t see him getting by both Miami and the Giants though. I understand some people feel the Krohn’s disease revelation will hurt his draft stock, but I am not among them.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
Two 1st rounders at ILB
Is that then the future? It could be tough to retain both in the long run when they want to be paid, like our good friends Ray Ray and Bart Scott, and it would probably be magnified since they’d both have mid-1st round pedigree. So do you eventually let Timmons walk and keep McClain since he’d have less mileage? Timmons versatility probably won’t be easy to replicate though, and he is still very young even with his years of experience.
As such was McClain a playmaker or a banger at Alabama? He looks to have the mass and raw power to be an effective buck, but would he be fine with toiling around in the trenches soaking up blocks for years while Timmons soaks up stats?
I’d love to have McClain on the team, no doubt about it. I think LeBeau could put together a whole new menu of fun with them switching off roles and disguising packages and the like. But my reservation is that concentrating blue chip prospects at one position might not keep the team as well rounded in the long run, and in the future we might find ourselves wishing we’d laid the foundation for the new era of a dominant O-line or gotten Big Snack’s replacement instead of opting for the relative luxury of two incredibly talented 1st rounders at ILB.
by barnerburner on Mar 23, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
You know
I never really looked at it like that. I heart Linebackers and perhaps that has clouded my vision but you are absolutely right in that regard. I just hate watching some of these outstanding LBs going to other teams so much, I forget that we have a dearth of talent there now.
You just changed the way I look at this draft .. .. .. as if that amounts to a hill of beans!
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions
We had two first rounders last year
with farrior and timmons, you eventually are going to have to replace foote or farrior one way or another.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Farrior is old though
The key difference is the age gap. Farrior is more than 10 years older than Timmons and in toyota years has probably rolled over to 300,000 miles by now, while Timmons and McClain are just 3 years removed from each other (draft year as well as age). We need another young body at ILB sooner rather than later, but the point that Blitz was making in his article is that Timmons is already Farrior’s replacement, and the tacit corollary to that is that sexy 1st round picks aren’t always suited to the blue collar work of a buck. If you’re taking a LB in their first round you’re expecting a playmaker, while a buck is more of a play-enabler of sorts. It’s almost a waste of talent to use your top pick on a skilled, honed playmaker and then tell him to ignore his instincts and training from college and instead keep getting into the guard’s face rather than homing in on the ball.
Foote is very effective as a buck, and he was a 4th rounder. His replacement can and should be found in the later rounds as well. A first rounder should be a talent that makes everyone around them better, especially the other guys in their positional group. My opinion is that the relative benefit to having Timmons and McClain as our ILBs of the future is not nearly of the same magnitude as the potential benefit to having a proven monster come in to anchor our O-line or D-line or to have a legitimate shutdown larcenous corner patrolling the secondary (though I’m not sold on any of the purported first round corners being a better long-term investment than Iupati/Pouncey/Dan Williams).
by barnerburner on Mar 23, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
on purported 1st round corners
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Man you sure made that analysis
sound purdy
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
+1
totally agree. We can and should be able to find ILB value in the middle or late rounds. As people pointed out we are having less luck then we used to finding OLB value in the late rounds because of the number of 3-4 copycats out there. The tweener college DE is becoming harder and harder to find.
by SteelerBuddha on Mar 23, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
I was hoping we’d get a crack at guys like Clint Sintim in the 3rd round, but no dice. As far as curveballs go, depending on the circumstances I could be surprisingly ok if the front office came out of deep left field and wound up grabbing Brandon Graham somewhere in the first.
As for potential late round tweeners, Daniel Te’o Nesheim out of Washington might be worth a shot. This was based on my own “analysis” of seeing the words “undersized DE” and “4.7 40-yard dash” referring to him (though they were buried in some article that was actually about his teammate Donald Butler), and then “crosschecking” by finding that bigjay consistently has him going in the 4th round to Chicago in his mock drafts. But coming out of a school that no one has had any reason to watch the past few years, who knows he might stay under the radar.
by barnerburner on Mar 23, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions
True
I think the argument that some have made, however, is that Timmons might eventually slide to OLB once Harrison retires, leaving McClain as the stud ILB with a replacement for Foote (possible prosthetic, but to be determined).
Either way, he would definitely have to be BPA and by a long distance with our more short-term needs at C/G, DT, and CB.
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
nice save
he stumped me :)
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Timmons' bulk
There is merit to that argument. My reservations about it though have to do with the way Timmons seems to be built. He has the natural pass rush ability, but without the mass of Woodley or denseness of Harrison, I have to wonder if he’d be able to stand the physical toll and constant wear of duking it out with tackles every down, not to mention the double teams he’d inevitably draw on occasion. He might have to bulk up before becoming an every down, every game OLB. But would his speed be sacrificed if it came to that? I really don’t know, but good food for thought
by barnerburner on Mar 23, 2010 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Feeling emboldened after reading the article mentioned in the post
It would seem that the only necessary comparison would be Harrison and Timmons, given Harrison’s more advanced age and the fact that the ROLB needs to be the better pass rusher.
Timmons 6’1", 234 lbs
Harrison 6’0", 242 lbs
Timmons might be able to add a bit more weight, but there would still be no question as to who would be stronger. On that point, Timmons lack of bulk would be an issue. However, I see two ways that it might still work. First, the scheme might adapt a bit to the talents of the players, i.e. Timmons’ ability to cover and protect the outside versus the run would come at the cost of diminished pass-rushing ability compared to Harrison. Additionally, whereas Harrison is successful more with his ‘denseness’, my feeling is that Timmons would utilize what seems like better agility and explosiveness to beat tackles.
It has been mentioned that tackles are getting a bit shorter and lighter to deal with the speed of pass rushers, so it almost could be a question of the Steelers being ahead of the curve. Further, the toll of dealing with the tackles would be much better than the current toll of dealing with guards and maintaining blocks as a buck. Either way, I do not see the speed needing to be sacrificed, rather there may be a couple situations where he would not be asked to do what harrison does.
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
Timmons as OLB
Bochutte is in agreement with you guys on this one. Timmons could definitely transition to the outside. The Steelers also tend to drop both OLBs into coverage a ton, so in some ways he would be just fine. I do think he would want to get a bit stronger to be able to match what deebo get’s done at the position.
Then again sometimes it’s not about size or speed, but just about attitude. People used to say that Lambert just looked like a normal dude until he got on the football field.
Not sure it will be easy to replace Deebo’s mean streak when he’s gone.
by SteelerBuddha on Mar 23, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Attitude and mean streak
The difference between Timmons and Harrison in my mind is in this clip:
For the life of me I can’t understand why he couldn’t get his ass into the endzone. Deebo ran through 7 Cardinals, four shopping carts, and the neighborhood kid’s lemonade stand and got into the endzone in the Super Bowl. Why couldn’t Timmons when he looked to be home free with 50 yards to go? Ok, maybe Ryan Clark could’ve gotten a bit more of Ben Watson on that block and maybe the stakes were completely different – regular season with the game in hand vs. Super Bowl with the clock at 0:00 before halftime.
Whatever. If Deebo had that ball it would’ve been a touchdown.
Deebo’s dense build lets him withstand the punishment of OLB, but it’s his mean streak and killer instinct that made him a Pro Bowler and Defensive Player of the Year. Schemes can be tweaked to try to take advantage of a player’s strengths, and I’m sure LeBeau would make adjustments to cater to Timmons superior versatility. But a lot of plays come down to sheer willpower – do you want it more than that guy on the other team?
Granted, that game was last year and maybe (hopefully) if Timmons had the same chance again today he’d make sure he got in there himself, rather than leaving it up to our spotty short-yardage offense. But I don’t yet have the vibe that Timmons can replace Harrison. That is different from saying that Timmons would have trouble converting to OLB, the more I think about it I’m sure the coaching staff could make it happen if circumstances dictated. But there are intangibles that I want to see before I’ll say that he should be an OLB in this defense.
Could Timmons have done what Woodley did at the end of the Super Bowl – kept his pedal to the metal, beat his man, and forced the fumble that clinched the game? I’d like to think so, but I better not see his motor stop again like it did in the clip.
by barnerburner on Mar 23, 2010 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions
All good points
I am hoping maturing and the confidence that comes with it might bring some new qualities to the surface with Timmons.
Also, although I mention that Timmons could be an OLB, my instinct seems to go more with him playing the Mack. For our defense, which is more vital (read also: hard to come by): a pass-rushing OLB a la Harrison or a DC-type ILB that organizes the defense and makes it go. My sense is that it is the latter and that if Timmons is being prepared to do so, then he will stay there. Of course, McClain falling to the Steelers would be interesting. If he is such a special player, and thereby BPA, we would seem to have to take him and make things work, maybe replacing Deebo eventually with a cheaper option and have more ILB blitzes and the like.
The one definitive action to my mind would be if we traded up to get McClain. That would signify not only how highly we rate him, but also that either we do not plan on keeping Timmons much longer or that he is shifting to OLB.
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
Bouchette is also in agreement
with Timmons being better suited to the Mack LB spot in general: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10061/1039708-66.stm
Very well spoken
Now I’ll go and crawl back under my rock. :)
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 23, 2010 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions
like the idea expect for one problem
rookies the D can’t start their first year.
I'm getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
modicum
I have never seen this word in my life, but using my context clues I came to the conclusion that it ment a wide variety of choices of people to put in the middle
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Its a Great Day to be a Mountaineer where ever you may be" Tony Caridi
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
Ding ding ding
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions
You know what
vocabulary FAIL on my part. You are right. Did someone use it in the wrong context above. I really don’t feel like going back through all these comments just to call someone out but I certainly was wrong.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Blitz used it
Above all else, I think the decision to bring Foote back provides the Steelers defense with a modicum of flexibility and depth in the middle of the field that they lacked last year.
Just pasted modicum in the search field…I think he used it for what he meant.
Its a bit like a smidgen
I may be old but I... oh d*mn, I forgot what I was going to say.
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Mar 23, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought it was a smidgen like a bit
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Well
It’s a bit like a bit, but a trifle more than a smidgen which is a couple specks above a whit, which is really just a mite more than a mote. Or is that a mote more than a mite. I am a wee bit confused.
by SteelerBuddha on Mar 23, 2010 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions
so is it like yonder
a indefinite amount that can be whatever you need it to be.
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Its a Great Day to be a Mountaineer where ever you may be" Tony Caridi
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
by WVPiratesfan on Mar 24, 2010 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions
as long as it is smallish
I may be old but I... oh d*mn, I forgot what I was going to say.
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Mar 24, 2010 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions
poquito?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Si
I may be old but I... oh d*mn, I forgot what I was going to say.
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Mar 25, 2010 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions
gotcha ya
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Its a Great Day to be a Mountaineer where ever you may be" Tony Caridi
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
by WVPiratesfan on Mar 24, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Farrior
Here is an idea, why don’t we let Farrior walk at the end of this season to free up a little extra cash to pay Woodley and Holmes? Extend Woodley now, like right after the draft and before the season!
If he has another drop off year
I’d be all for that or a restructure on the remaining term of his contract. His leadership is invaluable.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I will be STEALING this article
This is the shit I love to post over at my favorite “dive bar” steeler forum…. great articles in the offseason? rare and hardly ever found except here.
no im not kissing the big beans ass. Just callin em as I sees em.
stillers forums.com may you rest in peace. you rat basterds.
I don't think I've read one comment
from you where you even attempt to make yourself remotely likeable or try to get along with anyone here.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions
think he's going to STEAL this article?
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Mar 23, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't get it
what is the point of just coming here and acting like a DB? I guess some people are just angry.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
He's acting like Ike Taylor?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
More like
Chris McAlister
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
or Jack Tatum?
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
He was perhaps the biggest DB to ever play DB.
"Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt." - Abraham Lincoln
by chewiesteeler on Mar 23, 2010 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions
+1
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
hehe
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Mar 23, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions
You'd be a terrible ump
Just callin em as I sees em.
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 23, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions
future linebackers
Great article! Glad someone explained this to all those bashing Timmons. It wouldn’t have made sense to release Farrior last year as he was still good (prior to season) and was a coach on the field. The plan was for Timmons to move into his spot all along. Remember how they described him coming out of Fla.St. (Everything spelled MACK Playmaker). The “hope” was for him to be to the LB unit what Polamalu is to the DB’s.
Foote is a decent Buck lb. Hopefully LT can assume the starting Mack role w/Farrior as a backup. To get Spikes in either the 2nd or 3rd rd would be great. I really like Jason Worilds in the 2nd or 3rd as well at OLB (groom behind Harrison). To sum it up…wait till you see LT wreaking havoc from the Mack role…i just hope he has the instincts of Farrior, i believe he is a better athlete than Farrior’s younger days.
I don’t think I’ve read one comment from you where you even attempt to make yourself remotely likeable or try to get along with anyone here
Thats not my job. Im not politically correct. Im a steeler fan. I drink. I eat steak. I shoot animals. I wave the terrible towel ALL DAY LONG. You dont like me? Then you dont like the guy standing next to you in the big ben or troy jersey either. Im not sitting here holding hands singing kumbaya in unison.
That being said when I said STEAL the article it was in reference to the bean saying on another thread i post his articles on other sites without referencing him . he got the joke. he even laughed. whether that was at me or with me I dont really care.
Im here for entertainment and I find his articles just that. as well as informative. again fact…not kissing backside.
One thing ive found of this site is it needs to loosen up just a tad. Other than that its perfect.
In addition why would one be banned here if they are not cussing at everyone, are not racist, and btw add to the site through advertising it elsewhere. your readership grows through me.
actually swisscheesevale72 DID find this site due to my posting of beans articles and for that I do actually APOLOGIZE.
ahem…
I am sorry for letting swiss know about this site.
stillers forums.com may you rest in peace. you rat basterds.
We need to lighten up?
You clearly have not been here long enough. Half of the stuff we talk about on here doesn’t even involve football.
by StoneColdSteel on Mar 23, 2010 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions
it needs to loosen up just a tad.
That’s what she said
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Fail
"OOH! A piece of candy. OOH! A piece of candy."
-James Woods
by Steel Spike on Mar 24, 2010 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions
hmmm
dyslexic comment posting
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
by PixburghArn on Mar 24, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
nothing like a good face palm +1
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Its a Great Day to be a Mountaineer where ever you may be" Tony Caridi
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
by WVPiratesfan on Mar 24, 2010 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions
settle down
It’s all good. People give Hi5 a chance. I’m sorry I was rude to you. I was once very pissed at you for copying and pasting my work but I’m over it. Just try to fit in. All’s good.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Mar 23, 2010 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh no
Im not politically correct. I drink. I eat steak. I shoot animals.
Hi5Steeler = Jeff Reed? ( ;
by SteelerBuddha on Mar 23, 2010 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions
ha
ill take almost 3 mil a year to work for 2 minutes a game :)
stillers forums.com may you rest in peace. you rat basterds.
I would beat the hell out of a towel dispenser
and piss on a cops leg for 3 million a year.
But it probably wouldn’t volunteer to do Reed’s job.
I mean we are talking about the fan base that threw garbage on Tommy Maddox’s lawn after a couple of bad games. Can you imagine what they would do to me after I missed three 20 yard field goals, two extra points and didn’t manage to KO past the 40 in my first game?
by SteelerBuddha on Mar 23, 2010 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions
no
he didn’t say anything about beating up paper towel dispensors, or getting arrested for disorderly conduct
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Its a Great Day to be a Mountaineer where ever you may be" Tony Caridi
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
by WVPiratesfan on Mar 24, 2010 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions
No offense
your readership grows through me.
I can’t help but picture you on a steep mountain top in Dark Sith robes with lightening bolts coming out of your fingertips.
nice info
i kinda wonder how well farrior would be suited for the buck role & timmons in the mack? i dont know enough about linebackers to make an educated guess on that…besides the fact that farrior can no longer play the mack role every play.
I wonder if the Buck is not a younger mans position.
Talent wise Farrior could probably do it, but with the miles on him, taking on FB’s in the hole could add up real fast.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
good point
then i guess farrior’s days with the steelers are numbered
Tomlins remarks about a LB at 35 make me feel the same way.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
I think it is more mentality, much like so many other things
In my sport, rugby, there are two different center positions, 12 and 13. The 12 is more of a straight-ahead runner, not dancing or juking with the ball, while the 13 gets to be a playmaker. I think the two ILB positions are similar. If one is more disposed to shedding blocks and attacking the RB, then it would counter-instinctual to force them to stay on blocks and not always have eyes in the backfield.
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
ok in an effort to be more well liked I have changed my avatar to my pet pug who also loves a fine cigar.
at least he loves me
stillers forums.com may you rest in peace. you rat basterds.
+1
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Mar 24, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
woodley
there is no way they are not resigning woodley or holmes….both of them love pitssburgh way too much
i wouldnt be so sure about holmes
He butted heads with Tomlin at time last year. His words, not mine.We’ll see what kind of payday he feels like he deserves.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Mar 23, 2010 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Have to love Omar Kahn
I think Holmes stays, partially because Hines Ward would seek and destroy if he did not. Holmes has always seemed to be the future replacement for Ward, and the way the contracts are running, I think Ward’s money will become Holmes’ money. Also, Holmes is the new Yoda for Wallace, so it might help to see the future so vividly represented in the Now.
By the way, it doesn’t hurt to have guys like Randle El and Foote come back with the stories of other locales and diminished returns. Maybe Holmes looks at the contract and says, “Two million a year more or Two more Super Bowl rings”…
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
Setting things straight
I thought the article was full of contradictions and inaccuracies as well as alot of the comments.
First off the “Buck” position plays to the stongside of the offensive formation and is the position that James Farrior has been playing for years now. The most important difference between the Buck and Mack is the Buck makes the defensive calls and adjustments for the front 7. That’s by far the biggest dfference and requires leadership which is somthing Timmons hasn’t dispalyed so far. The “Mack” is the weakside ILB position and is the position manned by Timmons.
The aritcle states the Buck must be a thumper, but only because playing to the strongside means the defense will be seeing at least as many blockers to that side of the field. Ideally both the Buck and Mack will be covered and left unblocked so they can flow to the ball and make the tackle. It’s the only way a guy like Farrior, who played at 218lb can play in our scheme.
How this happens is due primarily to what is happening up front with the DL as not all 34s are created equal. The Steelers 34 as currently constructed is largely a 1-gap defense now and plays a 50 front as a base D. The NT and DE’s job are to keep the Center and guards off the ILB’s. If OL are getting to our ILB’s its because our guys are doing the job up front.
The article also talks about the Mack not having gap control. That’s not really true either because they normally have one gap responsibiility but do have to be able to read and react to a play as it develops. Ever hear Tomlin talk about the D not maintaining gap integrity or not maintaining their run fits?
We’ve discussed the positions schematically, but the real issue with Timmons is more of his inabiltiy to grasp the mental aspects of the game such as knowning his assignment and working through the trash to make the tackle. Timmons has no problems filling the hole as some of mentioned but it’s more of being able to read and diagnose the correct hole to fill
Interesting
In my original post, I had mentioned that it would be great if people who knew more about LB in the 3-4 would fill in. It seems like you definitely fit that bill. It would be great if you could write up a bit more of an intro to the 3-4, or maybe write your feedback on the Packers article that both Blitz and I referenced. I think it would make a great fanpost that most people would want to read and comment on.
by SteelerBuddha on Mar 23, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I lack the expertise here
and the last part of your comment makes perfect sense, but I think the core issue is which position is Farrior’s? Is he the Buck or the Mack? If the Buck is a thumper, which both you and Blitz agree on, then I can not see how Farrior fits the bill. He would seem to be more of the playmaker type. Furthermore, if the Buck is a thumper and would therefore seem to be a bit stouter against the run, he would seem he is less able to diagnose the play and attack the ball carrier rather than needing to maintain blocks. If Farrior were the Buck, and needing to hold blocks for the others, then he would not have been averaging 120 tackles/year for a while there.
As I said, the final part on Timmons though is spot on, and maybe the reason why he might be expected to move to OLB, where he only needs to worry about covering the one gap out wide.
Troy Pull-a-muscle? :(
I see
So in the Steelers 3-4 with Hampton & Smith up front, the ILBs have largely been kept free to make plays… and so Farrior as the playcalling strongside leader has been able to make tons of plays over the past bunch of years playing at only 220ish… While Farrior and Fox and Foote are players, to me it sure seems like McClain would make an excellent playcalling instinctive leader at the Buck for years, assuming that questions are answered on the Crohns disease and on his coverage skills/quickness when not moving up to tackle the ballcarrier… This also reinforces the importance of space-eating DT, and run-stuffing DE to the Steelers scheme. Hopefully Ziggy continues developing, in particular, against the run. How many year(s) are left in Smith’s fine career? Another DE could be in the cards but Derrick Morgan is suited to the 4-3 so not for Steelers in the first round… With maybe half the league now doing 3-4, good 3-4 DTs are really hard to come by. It has been said that Dan Williams is one of maybe two 3-4 DTs in this entire draft. Doing some quick math, that means he is still relevant to the Steelers even though Hampton in now re-signed… and then there’s J.Haden, M.Iupati, B.Graham, C.J.Spiller, M.Pouncey, J.Pierre-Paul, K.Wilson, and OTs like T.Williams, A.Davis, C.Brown, B.Campbell… Any thoughts on Weatherspoon? Is he projected in the early 2nd? He seems like an instinctive animal with leadership who’s a bit on the small side; if the Steelers frontline meets the stoutness standard, maybe Weatherspoon could be a young Farrior and good value for Steelers. Maybe slide back in the first and get Pouncey/Wilson/Brown/etc and then trade up in the 2nd to get Weatherspoon?
You are correct
I rarely post compared to others, especially in the off-season. Thought I would opine since I have time while surfing today and some people seem interested… The referenced ‘article’ was very basic and not entirely accurate. The Steelers 3-4 has been a 2 gap defense for the most part for many years. They may employ some one gap responsibilities, especially on blitzes and overload alignments, whether they are in a true zone, a zone blitz or man coverage behind the front.
Regardless, the Steelers 3-4 is different than many 3-4 defenses in that each front player usually has 2 gaps assigned to them versus only 1 in other systems. In the end, a player can only defend one gap – eventually he is going to move to or make a play on one side of a blocker. You can’t make a tackle with a blocker in your face. The term two-gap refers to the defender’s responsibilty versus the run. If their key tells them one thing, they play one side or gap of a given offensive player. If their key tells them another thing, then they play the opposite gap. Therefore, each defender is responsible for 2 gaps at the snap but only one after making their read. A true 2 gap NG plays both A gaps and makes the tackle if the runner tries to run on either side of the center. If he is double teamed by the C and the playside guard, there is no lineman to block the ILB. If the ILB stuffs the FB at or close to the LOS, then there is little or no room to run. Once a man gets off the block, he makes the tackle for a short gain if any.
The NG and DEs play in a more neutral or head up position over their offensive counterpart compared to a LB. They can get their hands on the blocker and neutralize his block or release toward the LBs almost immediately. The LB is on the run to the ball if his gap is not threatened. He doesn’t want to or need to touch a blocker unless the ball is immediately behind the blocker. If so, he needs to ‘thump’ the blocker to neutralize his block and slip off to the ball carrier. The defensive lineman always attacks his man in order to stand his ground, maintain his ability to play two gaps until the ball is commited and to keep his O line counterpart from releasing immediately to block the LB behind him.
It is harder for a LB or DB to take a guy on nose to nose and then make a tackle. Obviously, if you are playing ‘back’ (behind the LOS) then the offensive player is blocking you beyond the line of scrimmage already. This means the RB is at or beyond the LOS with a head of steam before you can initiate the tackle. The key for all defenses is slowing down the RB before he gets to the second level (where the LBs play in relation to the LOS) and then separate from the attempted block and make the tackle quickly.
One gap defenses do not ask their players to think on the run as much as two gap defenses. The possible actions and reactions are more numerous when you are given more potential responsibilities. With that, more reads are required to get you where you are supposed to be. A read is simply the observance of an offensive player’s initial movement and your accompanying counter to it. Generally, Defensive linemen and LBs read offensive linemen. A LB may read a RB after getting his first read from an offensive lineman and/or TE.
Most fans don’t have the knowledge to undestand drawn out conversations regarding the technical aspects of football. Many don’t want to know. Many people on this site are inquisitive and also bring good information. I probably know more than many people but do not know the specifics of the Steelers defensive assignments versus all offensive looks and their own alignments. One can surmise what they are after the play but it is not entirely obvious. The coach’s film is the best for analyzing what really happened but we get the TV view (mid elevation and from the sideline) most of the time.
i agree with one of the others in this long strand of replies that Timmons was probably drafted to play OLB, particularly right or weakside. His body type and speed are a natural there. With Deebo playing out of his mind and Woodley on the other side – how could they pull them off the field being that they were already such effective starters? LeBeau does do some different/weird things with the ILBs. I would guess he wanted Timmons inside because he was so atheletic and that the outside was already so good. Also, his athleticism lends to doing things a standard ‘plugger’ could never do. Le Beau loves the exotics and the insane variations possible with athletic LBs on the field. I think that is part of the reason Timmons has stayed inside. I do think he is a liability against a power running team however. His athleticism is negated to a degree when they pound the ball right at him.
"Franz" in NoCal
Tiimons/woodley
My theory is that Timmons was drafted to eventually replace Harrison who was a cheap and overachieving back up to Porter. Then the silver back went all defensive mvp, 100 yd td return in the superbowl, etc. and they had to pay him despite his age. He was even better than they anticipated, which is a good problem to have. So Timmons , by default and as a 1st rounder, became the replacement to the most convenient to replace lb, which happened to be Foote Farrior was signed to a team friendly deal and foote was due to be paid, he was odd man out. What i think will happen is , given the dominance and age of Woodley, the team will have to keep him even if it means cutting deebo and sliding Timmons outside where he would be Great. The inside will be manned by the trio of Foote , farrior , and fox and whoever the next young gun turns out to be. .
Silverback will be around 3-5 more years
He didn’t really play until he was 28. He played all four years of college(IIRC) and spent the following five years trying to make NFL rosters. Unbelievably, Deebo was cut by both the Ravens and the Steelers and since it took him so long to “make it” his body is stronger, more developed and has far, far less mileage on it than other players his age. Silverback has played four ull seasons as a pro even though he’s been out of college for ten years.
My long-winded way of saying Deebo will endure indefinitely- he’s not a regulr human being; he’s a beast of a man.
/ my two cents
Looks like Tomlin agrees with many of re: Farrior's age
Tomlin cited the age of linebacker James Farrior as a reason Foote will help.
“There’s not many 35-year-old football players particularly at the linebacker position. I think that’s why it was important that we went out and got a guy like Larry Foote. Not only for [Farrior] specifically, but to create general competition at the linebacker position.
“Any time you have 35-year-old, you better strengthen yourself from a depth and competition standpoint because that’s inevitable, that’s part of the game. He’s been extremely blessed to play as long as he’s played it. He continues to play it at a high level in my opinion, but I’m not going to take that for granted as we push into August of 2010.”
I guess we weren’t the only one who were worried about what Farrior looked like speed wise.
Holmes and Woodley
will absolutely be resigned … they’ve been talking about Holmes taking over Hines’ place in the slot for 2 years, Ward will become the #3 and Wallace will move outside.
Besides Troy, Woodley is our best D player (no offense to Deebo, but Woodley’s ascending and Deebo peaked in ’08)
They both get resigned, LONG TERM.
peaked?
James Harrison has played at a consistently high level for years. There was a certain game PRIOR to what you say was peak in ‘08 which may be the most dominant individual defensive performance I have witnessed. He took over the game (against Mr MaLor’s team), setting up four TDs in a HALF of play via: two forced fumbles, an interception, a fumble recovery, 2.5 sacks, 5 hurries, 1 forced intentional grounding, 4 tackles, one pass defensed, and a special teams tackle! - IN A HALF! Then in the 2nd half he added 5 tackles, a sack, and a hurry.
Last year, he was one of best in the first half of the year (including statistically- look at pressures, not just sacks, too), neck-and-neck with DeMarcus Ware at OLB, and similar to Freeney, Woodson, and Sharper. While his sacks dropped off, he was still drawing a lot of defensive attention, helping to free Woodley. They are similarly excellent, and if the D ties up the weak links, that duo will continue to be supremely dangerous.
Why hasn’t Lawrence Timmons developed into the monster that we all thought he would be by now heading into his fourth year?
I know why.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
?
?
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 24, 2010 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Shoot me an email and I’ll tell you. Told Blitz already, but I don’t think he believes me.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
Top secret info huh?
"One important key to success is self-confidence. An important key to self-confidence is preperation."
-Arthur Ashe
by NYSteelersFan4 on Mar 24, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions
You never emailed me back
With the 18th pick of the 2010 NFL Draft the Pittsburgh Steelers select Florida QB Tim Tebow. (not a RB!)
by John Stephens on Mar 24, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Timmons
Timmons is better suited to be the play maker not the banger. Or not an inside linebacker at all! let him drop into coverage and rush the end. That is what he would be better at! Playing outside backer would probably be a better fit for his athleticism.
Problems without Aaron Smith
We all saw last year what not having the best ever DE for a 3-4 defense resulted in ,sack totals were way down,Pressure on the QB sometimes non existent, without the defense line the backers look like pop warner players getting pushed 10 yards down the fid!
Peezy revisited (and Gildon, and Lloyd)
Chad Brown too, for that matter. For those that remember, the Steelers had Chad playing inside until Lloyd got hurt. He blew up & played better than Lloyd, but they didn’t resign him before the start of season so he took big $$ with Seattle in the offseason.
The point: Timmons was drafted to play OLB (converting from DE at FSU), but couldn’t displace Deebo while Woodley exploded on the scene. So? If FO decides that Timmons is the “future” at OLB (not Deebo) after ‘10, they might give him the job … like Deebo took Peezy’s job, and Deebo will be on the street (like Joey was). If not, Timmons will stay inside or go bye-bye.
Timmons
Ahhhh…..no.
Timmons did not convert from DE at Florida State but was the starting SLB during his junior year of college. He did play some DE as a sophomore in pass rushing situations but the guy was an outside linebacker.
We had 47 sacks last year
I don’t call that way down…. the pressure might have been down but not the sacks.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Mar 24, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Can we just take E. Thomas or K. Wilson to help the secondary ...
and then move on to Round 2? Another month until the draft? DAMN!!!!!!

by 































