April 22, 2010 - A Day That Changed The History Of The Pittsburgh Steelers?
History isn't just defined and shaped by a limited number of singular events. Instead, it's a never ending narrative that builds on itself. Nothing is detached entirely from the past. There are of course watershed moments that help structure the overall framework of a historical narrative. In American history, those dates obviously include the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, 9/11, etc. In the lore of the Pittsburgh Steelers, defining moments would include The Immaculate Reception, the 1974 Draft, Antwaan Randle-El's throw to Hines Ward in Super Bowl XL, the hiring of Chunk Noll/BillCowher/Mike Tomlin, Santonio Holmes' toe tapping TD to win SB XLIII, etc.
Well, Thursday April 22nd, 2010 could be one of those defining moments in the history of the Pittsburgh Steelers organization. Day one of this year's draft could be viewed as a defining moment in the storied stewardship of the Rooney family over the Steelers franchise.
That defining moment of course could come in the form of a trade of franchise quarterback Ben Roethlisberger. Whether or not it's at all likely to happen (the NFL and its teams are notorious for their secrecy and lack of transparency) is debatable. But reports seem to unanimously claim that the organization has been at some level entertaining the idea of trading franchise quarterback Ben Roethlisberger.
Before I go any further, let me just say to those who want to say: 'way to not support your QB dude' - I'm not trying to do anything with this post other than to say wow, we're maybe on the cusp of a very interesting moment in Steelers history, and two, no matter what, I trust the Steelers ownership to make a sound deicision based on a whole lot of factors. I stand by the Pittsburgh Steelers and how they're operated and how rooting for an organization like that makes me feel. I love to stand by the individuals that make up the organization collectively. But for better or worse, the NFL is structured in a way that leads to lots of player movement around the league. There's not much loyalty these days when it comes to personnel, so frankly, I don't feel too compelled to exude limitless support to any one player in the organization. I would however not prefer to switch allegiances with the team I love. Ever.
This isn't about morality so much as it is me trying to conceptualize all of this through the lens of what the Rooneys have at stake with their brand and how they may or may not be willing to jeopardize the image they've worked so hard to create with their fans and around the NFL.
Back to the rumors floated around about the organization entertaining potential trade offers. Being that we're on the eve of the 75th NFL Draft, it makes sense that potential trade offers involving draft picks might be explored. That said, a decision doesn't necessarily need to be reached by tomorrow if the Steelers are in fact interested in moving on from the Ben Roethlisberger era. The team could conceivably wait for the dust to settle on the Draft, see which teams have filled glaring needs, and which may be in the market to make a move based on the assets they've collected in the draft. I don't know, but I do think that there comes a point in the not so far future where the team publicly commits to giving Ben Roethlisberger a chance to write a new story for himself moving forward. If that happens (and it most likely will to the delight of those fans who want Ben's special skill set on our side regardless of his off field behavior) then Roethlisberger will have the chance to cement his legacy not only as a big game quarterback with multiple SB rings, but also as a human being that got raked through the coals as a result of his own poor judgment only to come out the other end a better man.
I have no clue what the top brass may or may not be thinking, but I do think that in a billion dollar business like the NFL, it's safe to say that there has at least been a conversation about what it means for the Steelers 'brand' if they were to stand by Big Ben, as well as what it might symbolize for the brand's image if they were to trade him now. In the immediate future, the decision may be interpreted a lot different than it might be 5, 10, 25, and even 100 years from now.
Remember, this is a family business that the Rooneys are operating. A telecom or any other sort of corporate interest doesn't own the Steelers. The Rooney family owns the Steelers, and as evidenced by their diligent efforts last year working out an ownership structure that would ensure that the family would retain control over the organization long into the future confirms they're in it for the longrun.
The Steelers brand is one of the strongest in all of sports...worldwide. And it wasn't built overnight. As we learned recently from a post penned by mary rose, 'the character of the Steelers has not changed'. Great perspective offered in that piece, but what has changed is the media exposure of star athletes. God only knows what kind of mischief players may have gotten into back in the day. The public only really heard about the most egregious transgressions of the players Steeler Nation loved to cheer for. Today though, the media climate is different. Everybody's empowered with the technology to capture incriminating moments. And to the chagrin of misogynistic men, women today thankfully feel more compelled to speak up when they've been violated. That means, to me, that teams have to be a lot more calculating in how they manage their brands.
I myself have no idea whether or not to believe Big Ben when he says that he's going to learn from this, grow from this, and never let something like this happen again. I am though a believer that there's certain personalities and individuals that can't be trusted to make the adjustments and begin respecting their place within a society that's much bigger than themselves, no matter how famous or talented they are. Pacman Jones strikes me as one of those guys who will never get it. To lesser degrees, there's people in all of our lives we know are never truly going to 'get it' and find a way to lead a life that's not self-absorbed or reckless in some fashion.
When I say things like 'in the Rooneys I trust', what it really means is I trust their evaluation of people. Do they know football? Yeah, of course they do. But what really makes them successful if you ask me is how they successfully surround themselves with competent, trust worthy people. From their scouting department on up to the top-most personnel and financial folks - I imagine that there's not a Vinny Cerrato type shady character in the bunch.
Things are more complicated of course when you're dealing with multi-millionaire athletes in their 20s. Mistakes will be made, often times ones that could never be accepted from a 9-5 operational employee of the franchise. In today's age of agents and handlers, obviously Big Ben has been instructed by his team about what to say and how to handle himself. Still, I believe that the Rooneys were able to get some sense of whether or not they should hitch their wagon to Roethlisberger in the future based on his interaction with them in the aftermath of this mess. You can't B.S. people like that like you can the media. More importantly though, regardless of how he's handled himself this past 6 weeks, the Rooneys may have seen enough of Roethlisberger's personality to know that something like this is simply too likely to happen again in the future.
Bottom line is that whatever happens, I trust their people management skills and will remain steadfast in my belief that they will continue to value operating with the right kind of people while remaining committed to their ultimate goals of winning championships for the fans and making money for themselves. So whatever they decide to do with Ben Roethlisberger - whether that's to trade him or to support him 100% in the future so that he can hopefully make progress maturing as a person and ambassador of the franchise - I trust that the decision will be made based on where their most basic instincts lead them regarding Big Ben and his potential to rehabilitate his sense of self and his reputation with the Pittsburgh community locally and Steeler Nation and what it represents more broadly.
I am hoping for the best and will be thrilled if the Rooney's decide to stick with Big Ben. He's one helluva quarterback and it's obvious he's passionate about being great on the gridiron. Who knows, maybe this is the wake up call he needs to get him as serious about being great as Peyton Manning and Drew Brees are. If that happens, look out. And believe me, I'd prefer for Ben to be wearing a Steelers uniform if/when he finally decides to get with the program with his off field behavior.
All that said, I wouldn't be too shocked if the unthinkable happens and #7 is traded away in the next few days or weeks. An organization is bigger than one player, and if a collection of astute businessmen that have been exposed to the entire spectrum of personalities in their personal and professional lives mutually agree that somebody can't be trusted moving forward, then that's that. You have to cut your losses then and there, because even though talent and productivity reign supreme in the NFL, projecting a certain image to your fans and the corporate world that helps support you matters too. And if you know in your heart of hearts that you're hitching your wagon to a character that will likely let you down again, that's not acceptable. Not for a family business that is in it for more than just quick profits and 15 minutes of fame.
I think the world of Ben Roethlisberger as a quarterback so I very much hope that the organization believes that he can still be trusted to be the face of Steelers football. If they don't though, and decide to minimize the possibility of their brand being tarnished any more than it already has been recently, so be it. I would at least be confident that the decision was made with the long term interests of the organization and its fans in mind.
Stay tuned. The next few days and weeks could be the crescendo of an already quite 'loud' 2010 offseason for the six time Super Bowl Champion Pittsburgh Steelers.
68 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think it should be pointed out that all teams will, pre-draft, shop every player and every pick they have. It’s due diligence, because you never know when you’re able to get a first-round pick for Richard Seymour, who has one year left on his contract (nice move, Oakland).
At the risk of getting overly personal, this whole ordeal from the team’s perspective reminds me of a time where a good friend of mine started dating my ex-girlfriend. At first I was pretty upset about it, but maybe after a day or so, I came to my senses, and we hashed things out. We said everything was fine.
It dawned on me not long after that, our relationship had been forever changed. While we said we were cool with each other, and we were still friends, we were never going to be close again. It just wasn’t/isn’t possible.
I really don’t see how they can keep Roethlisberger after all of this. However, I don’t think it’ll be this year; I can see them dealing him before next draft. There’s just too much atmosphere for another team to trade that much capital for a guy with so much negativity surrounding him.
However, Ben knows the team is, at least, floating rumors that he’s available. The Steelers have effectively alienated him – whether that was their intention is beside the point. It’s not going to be long until he says “I need a fresh start.” Maybe he’s saying that now. They can part with no bitterness like my buddy and I, but sometimes there’s just no going back, and both sides can agree parting ways is in everyone’s best interest.
Well it seems
that the Steelers haven’t been shopping Ben around. Teams have been inquiring about him but the Steelers haven’t specifically said we’re going to trade Ben. per Ben’s Lawyer on Mike and Mike this morning.
He also said a couple other interesting things.
1) That ben didn’t provide alcohol for the ladies.
2) That the commissioner will see anyone associated with people getting drunk as a suspendable offense. That is why Ben got suspended, he was in the club consuming too much alcohol and was around people consuming too much alcohol. Interesting.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Apr 22, 2010 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Better be Herschel like!
As a lifelong Steeler fan who suffered through Brister, yes Bubby, yes Walter Andrew the III, I will be outraged to have the Rooneys trade a two time SuperBowl winning QB for a #1 pick…
You are telling me that 6 months ago ANYONE would trade Ben and Santonio Holmes for a #1 and #5?
The ONLY team that could offer anything would be the Raiders… It would have to be a Herschel Walker type trade… Otherwise Steeler fans, regardless of what the media says will go BALLISTIC.
We may say we hate lack of integrity… What we really hate is losing.
The raiders could offer a #1, #3, a tackle, Janikowski (Reed is the real jerk in the Burgh), a tackle, and most importantly Nnamdi Asomugha…With Asomugha the Steelers D is taken to a level the NFL hasn’t seen in a long time.
If it ain’t Herschel-like…. there will be a TON of burnt Terrible Towels. Thoughts??
RICK
I don’t think we’ll see a Herschel or Ricky Williams trade for Pig Ben. I’d be very happy though if they got a 2-3 picks for him.
PB is a great quarterback, but remember when he went 15-1 as a rookie? That was because of our great defense and running game. His job was to limit mistakes – which he did. Trent Dilfer did it and won a super bowl. So as valuable as he is, the Steelers can win without him.
Personally, I’d prefer to see him shipped out of town, if we can get fair value for him.
The FO has to be open for the Herschel deal if another team is desperate enough to offer it. BB is a proven commodity on the field. He isn’t old enough for the NE scrap heap. They have to be testing the waters, if not now, than for a few years down the road. It’s all just a guess, but I think it is posturing and they have a list of things that BB will be doing this off season to fall in line and realize that he is now in a bad place.
thoughts..
I will not be going ballistic
I will not be burning a terrible towel
If integrity isn’t high on your list, that’s all you, my fellow steelers fan
Regardless of what we get(if this trade does indeed go down) none of it will matter until we get into the season. If we win, they made the right decision..if we lose, oops.
If the ownership made moves based strictly on the W-L column, we wouldn’t even be talking about the possibility of this happening, this goes beyond that.
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Apr 22, 2010 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Integrity Matters
Excellent post. The Steelers are about integrity. Alexander Hamilton said it best: “Those who stand for nothing will fall for anything.” I trust them to make the right choice.
Yes integrity matters
But if we are 12-36 over the next 3 years, what the hell will our integrity matter?
Unless there is a 3rd one on the way, this would be the stupidest move in franchise history. At least give the man a shot this year. Let’s not all be so willing to speed over the edge of this cliff.
Bungles Tank Stupidly like Clockwork
--------
Every night at the club the girls screamed when he'd come
He stood six foot five and weighed 241
Kinda meaty in the face with a head full of stone
And everybody knew you didn't go to the bathroom alone around Big Ben
(Big Ben Big Ben) Big Fat Ben (Big Ben)
It certainly matters
to me.
I rarely care about what players do off the field. I don’t care about pot. I don’t care about affairs. I don’t even care about PEDs. This is different. Even if what Ben has done can’t be called a crime, he has exhibited a disturbing pattern of predatory behavior. It disgusts me, and I’d rather see the Steelers go 6-10 for the next 15 years than root for a sexual predator.
Watching BB’s on-field miracle escape artistry has been perhaps my greatest source of joy as a Steelers fan. The two Superbowls he was a part of were undeniably great moments, the first of which, I was lucky enough to share in person with my family in Pittsburgh. It’s not enough. Go away, Big Ben. I’d rather lose without you than win with you. It’s only football, and it’s not that important.
by ThisYearsModel on Apr 22, 2010 8:10 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with you
It really puts me into a quandry, especially as a woman from Western PA. On one hand, the Steelers are the pride of West PA, on the other how can I root for him?
by newcastle,pa-gal on Apr 22, 2010 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree
Folks, it is only football. And I’m willing to cut everybody (including athletes) more than a little slack in terms of their personal behavior — it’s their business. Predatory sexual behavior, however, is not ‘personal’ business; it is thoroughly unacceptable social behavior.
Integrity - unless we lose?
Really? Integrity only matters when we win? This is the kind of situational ethics that compromises us a little more each day…
by BrightSteel on Apr 22, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
No I'm saying there has to be a balance.
No one respects the Browns or the Lions. If we lose every year because we have no QB to lead us, integrity matters for naught. I would rather have a controversial QB that wins every year, then be “the best dog-gone people playing in the NFL donchaknow” and doormats. I’ll take a QB that has had some off field trouble (but never been formally charged or convicted of anything) then 6-10 the next few years.
Bungles Tank Stupidly like Clockwork
--------
Every night at the club the girls screamed when he'd come
He stood six foot five and weighed 241
Kinda meaty in the face with a head full of stone
And everybody knew you didn't go to the bathroom alone around Big Ben
(Big Ben Big Ben) Big Fat Ben (Big Ben)
Excellent article, Blitz, but..
I’m going to respectfully disagree with your assessment of the Rooneys. However, I’m not going to suggest that they don’t operate a model franchise, one that’s the envy of nearly all others.
However, the Rooneys are not without their errors. This is the same team, under the same ownership that:
*Cut Johnny Unitas
*Traded one of the most prolific receivers in Steelers history (Buddy Dial) for nothing
*Did not draft Dan Marino
And, finally, this team wandered in the proverbial desert for 26 years between Super Bowls until a veritable Moses, in the person of #7 arrived, and led them to a pair of Super Bowls.
Unfortunately, I think the Rooneys in this instance, are reacting to current public opinion, and speculatively on my part, to political considerations. Let’s not forget that the owner is now the ambassador to Ireland.
Frankly, much of this hysteria would be abated if Art II would simply state that now that the penalty has been assessed, Ben Roethlisberger, going forward, is the quarterback of the Pittsburgh Steelers.
by swissvale72 on Apr 22, 2010 7:32 AM EDT reply actions 4 recs
And, finally, this team wandered in the proverbial desert for 26 years between Super Bowls until a veritable Moses, in the person of #7 arrived, and led them to a pair of Super Bowls.
I want to rec this a million times.
It seems many people forget the glory that #7 brought to the team. I stated before that only 2 players would make me feel like the sky was falling if they left, Ben and Troy.
I plan on standing by that.
Bungles Tank Stupidly like Clockwork
--------
Every night at the club the girls screamed when he'd come
He stood six foot five and weighed 241
Kinda meaty in the face with a head full of stone
And everybody knew you didn't go to the bathroom alone around Big Ben
(Big Ben Big Ben) Big Fat Ben (Big Ben)
Well said....
The Rooney’s also let the greatest corner in NFL history walk….. Rod Woodson went on to make the Pro Bowl 3 more times as a safety. Trading Big Ben would be a huge mistake and set the franchise back years……
all of what you've pointed out is not properly evaluating what a player is worth
and with any team we could tack on lists & lists of situations like that. but the steelers overall have had a great record of making good overall decisions beyond evaluating a player’s talent level. in the recent past: picking cowher over donahue, choosing to let burress walk away, choosing when to part ways with older players yet keeping things purely professional & not alienating the players.
not only do the rooney’s have more information about this situation than anyone else (except for maybe the DA, but even the DA didnt get to interview ben), they have a great football background, and Art is a lawyer. i’m sure they get the big picture and will make the most reasonable decision whether it turns out in the long run to be the right one or not.
And let's also not forget....
The Rooneys’ handling of the Ernie Holmes situation, and the disparity of their handling of the domestic charges of James Harrison/Cedrick Wilson.
Ernie Holmes
was a mental health issue. I suspect that if Ben’s problem is deemed to be a previously undetected medical issue you will see a rehabilitation of his image and the Rooneys will embrace him once again. How much did his behaviour change after his motorcycle accident? Who knows. If it is deemed that he is just a self centered jerk then he will be gone.
And then we all woke up!
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Apr 22, 2010 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions
How capable is Ben, or anyone for that matter, of significant change in their life?
I remember the day of the 2004 draft so clearly: we were picking at 11, and I couldn’t watch Tommy Maddox stumble around and then fall down in the pocket any longer, so when Jacksonville passed on Ben at #9 I nearly did a backflip off of the couch (Houston was drafting at 10, and they’d just taken David Carr, so they weren’t going to pick him). From what I’d seen of him in college he just seemed so competitive, so gutsy and such a perfect fit for our team. I remember thinking, this guy is fearless, and that’s what I want in our QB.
Well, it’s six years later, and that fearlessness has certainly paid off on the field. But it’s the reason he’s in this off-field trouble as well. Ben has come to believe that he’s pretty much capable of anything, which has lead him to take some huge risks and make some terrible decisions. It’s who he is and it’s how he plays and lives.
So now, given the fact that he’s backed himself and the franchise into this terrible corner, the question is, how capable is he of change? Can he, or anyone for that matter, really make significant change in the behaviors they have made habit? And will making a change in one area — his personal life — have an adverse effect on how he plays football? Will it have a positive effect? Or will he screw up again and ultimately force the team to dump him for nothing like they did with Santonio? These are questions I think the Rooneys have to be considering. And they’re questions that will linger into the season and that will serve as distractions for a long time to come.
That’s why I don’t think the Rooneys have simply come forward and said Ben’s our guy. Because it’s more complicated than that. I don’t know if they believe in him anymore or if they believe he’s the healthiest thing for the Pittsburgh Steelers. He’s suddenly become an unknown quantity, and that makes keeping him a risk. Ultimately, I don’t think he’ll be traded, but it may be more because they can’t get a deal they think is worth making rather than because they don’t want to deal him. Either way, sitting on my couch in 2004 I never could have imagined it would come to this. It’s the saddest period this franchise has endured in a very long time.
"There is no truth but in transit." R.W. Emerson
by cliff harris is still a punk! on Apr 22, 2010 7:42 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
with you, as well as Blitz.
I think this is the realization I have come to on the Big Ben thing. I was pretty dumbfounded about the Santonio thing, and seemingly I should be more so about Big Ben, and yet I feel calmly resigned. Why? First off, it is out of my control. Second, I think every fan has that moment where they make that critical decision, not morals vs. victories, rather player or team.
I started supporting the Steelers in 1994, ironically after losing to the Cowboys in the Super Bowl. I grew up in a Dallas suburb, but both sides of my family were native Pittsburghers. I remember being conflicted at the tender age of ten whether I would support one or the other. About midway through the game, viewing the different actions of the Steelers and Cowboys fans, as well as the behavior of the Cowboys fans around me, something seemed to click and I found myself simultaenously hating both Neil O’ Donnell and Larry Brown, though disliking the former for somewhat different reasons.
Consequently, I was not born into being a Steelers fan, I was able to make a choice, and ever since my working hypothesis has been established, I have never once regretted it. Because the Steelers have always represented themselves as a TEAM I could root for. That is what made it such an ecstatic experience when they finally won in 2005. You could partake in that feeling of rooting for the good guys and almost feeling as having served in the trenches with them. Nothing that occurs in this situation will sway me from being a Steelers fan, though I have lost respect for Big Ben, and there is a simple reason why. If the Rooneys keep Big Ben, I am almost 100% confident that it will be more than a football decision. It is their personal stamp of integrity that Ben can be rehabilitated, in which case I can support him again. If they, however, decide to trade him, it means he is not worthy of the Steeler franchise and, although very sad, there would be no need to destroy memorabilia or the like. I wish him well and, in spite of any victories he accumulates, any renewed respect is contingent on him changing his behavior, as a Steeler or not.
Honestly, the only thing in this whole situation that could cause me to lose any respect for the Steelers at large is if they make their version of a Faustian bargain and keep Ben without feeling assured that he is committed to upholding the Steeler ideals. However, at the moment, I am confident in the Rooneys (whether motivated as businessmen protecting their brand or as upstanding individuals) to make a thoughtful and considered decision, and that is why, whether or not Ben is still a Steeler tomorrow or not, whether such a decision worsens our ability to win a Super Bowl this year, the next, or until we can build a Steeler team so deserving, my confidence in the Rooneys and my support for the Steelers will not waver.
Big Ben seems to have too much time on his hands, and too many hands on his time.
"Calmly resigned..."
My feelings exactly
"There is no truth but in transit." R.W. Emerson
by cliff harris is still a punk! on Apr 22, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Buried in here is a nugget:
Everybody’s empowered with the technology to capture incriminating moments.
We have allowed a surveillance society to develop around us. Sadly, it’s not some grand institution that’s watching. Instead, we are each others “Big Brother.” We have become voyeurs, mindlessly monitoring and documenting each other in places we might have once felt a sense of liberty born of anonymity. Privacy is dead. All the rules have been changed behind our backs and it is we who have changed them.
I’m not suggesting that we condone criminal behavior. However, we should be able to drink in a bar (among other things) without worrying about who might be capturing the scene for digital eternity on their cell phone camera.
"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway
There is a valid point here
When you live in a house with paper walls you learn to be quiet if you wish to keep your privacy. In the past you could be in public and still retain your privacy. Only the most famous would be recognized and even then only those with distinctive features (facial or otherwise). The current state of electronics has removed the anonymity from our public private lives. It is like living in a paper house. Celebrities ignore this at the peril of their careers.
This is currently an issue for celebrities but in some ways I think it will filter down into the lives of everyone. Instead of a 1984 scenario where a totalitarian regime is spying on everyone, think more of Japanese culture (and to a lesser extent Victorian England) where societal pressures to conform to certain codes of behaviour were very strict (this was partly class related but I still think there are similarities). I don’t see cultural changes like this happening overnight but I wouldn’t be surprised to see it happen over the next few decades.
And then we all woke up!
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Apr 22, 2010 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Paper walls is a good analogy...
Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon comes to mind as well.
"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway
Panopticon
I see what you are saying though that seems to be more totalitarian in nature. This situation is us constantly viewing and considering each other without having the option of privacy. Hmmm…. Maybe it is even less about the privacy as the lack of ability for our transgressions/foibles/quirks to be forgotten because all is seen but also all is remembered.
And then we all woke up!
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Apr 22, 2010 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Good point.
I thought of the Panopticon from Foucault’s conception of it as really being an engine of self-discipline. Each and every mobile phone brings the potential of surveillance. Thus, we perform the regulatory work of the totalitarian regime since we might be under observation. That said, I like the idea that we fear the permanence of our actions more than anything else. As you point out: no fading, no erasure.
"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway
McLuhan
Do you think McLuhan would classify the internet as a hot medium or cold?
With the changes in technology I wonder if he would have revised his position on TV.
And then we all woke up!
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Apr 22, 2010 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Good question...
and one I’ve struggled with a bit and remain unsure of. Thus far, I feel the internet to be a bit of a hybrid combining characteristics of both hot and cold — i.e., sometimes it seems to function like print, focused like a laser on a single sense with all the blanks filled in while, in the next moment it functions like TV, activating a cognitive tactility at a more shallow level across manifold senses. One thing I am sure of is that the internet (along with a host of other digital technologies) has made McLuhan not only relevant again, but also quite prescient. If media do influence cognitive organization and processing, then we are in a new world about which we understand very little.
"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway
McLuhan (cont)
not bad for a guy who wore a plastic clip-on tie (Tom Wolfe mentioned it in The Pump House Gang).
How do I break it to the cat that since he has been declawed, the rabbit he sees in our backyard would kick his sorry butt?
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Apr 22, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Absolutely.
I’m personally happy to see him resurrected. For about 15 years or so (80s/90s) he was unfairly dismissed as a kook.
"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway
there may have been some issues
arising from the brain tumor that idk about.
He was on the list of the most important Canadian in a contest the CBC ran a few years ago (iirc).
How do I break it to the cat that since he has been declawed, the rabbit he sees in our backyard would kick his sorry butt?
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Apr 22, 2010 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions
He should be on that list.
His waning popularity was more a function of academic trendiness than him. Plenty of folks wait for the ripe moment to beat up the biggest icons for no greater purpose than their own career advancement.
"Never mistake motion for action." - Ernest Hemingway
Mark Cuban nailed it on ESPN
It all boils down to what you think of him personally, from a team president standpoint. Can he find it in there somewhere to get that he has screwed up.
What scares me with Ben is that I think he’s 100% clueless. His appearance at his “I’m not a rapist” press conference suggests that no one can look him in the eye and get simple “save yourself” ideas across to him.
I mean, seriously, his appearance at that presser was probably what took him from a four game suspension to a six game suspension.
Rooneys
If roethlisberger is traded, and I think he will be, I believe there will be a huge resentment against the Rooneys for their over reacting and mishandling of two players this offseason. The Rooneys need to realize why we are fans and why we tune in on Sunday. Personally I don’t care if how big of an idiot ben is. I don’t care how many women Tiger Woods sleeps with. All I care about is that we have a team that has a chance to win a superbowl. If we trade ben I will lose my faith in that as well as the Rooneys.
by ironmike55 on Apr 22, 2010 8:32 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
You're right
There’s going to be a lot of people upset if Pig Ben is traded. But there’s going to be plenty of people that are okay with the decision.
I have a friend who owns a pretty large construction company in Virginia. He doesn’t tolerate any activity that would compromise the name of his company – and in effect, keeps his name clean. He’s had to fire people that produced for him, he’s had to fire people that he deeply cared for – but his business is well respected, profitable and headache free as a result of his commitment to running a clean business.
The Pittsburgh Steelers may as well be called the Pittsburgh Rooneys – if it were your family business, would you want to employ someone that brought shame to the organization? I for one don’t want the Steelers to be lumped in the same boat as the bengals and the raiders, which are havens for bad behavior and malcontents.
Great balanced post! However, I have a minor disagreement with this:
<<and it’s obvious he’s passionate about being great on the gridiron>>
If he was passionate about being great on the gridiron, why does he look he’s on the “body by Bettis diet”? When Ben cut’s himself shaving, nacho cheese comes out.
I hate to say this
Back in the day, I worked with a very mean, but powerful man in the surgery world. He always used to say “no one is indispensable”. It used to really irritate me, that he thought that we all eventually could be replaced.
Unfortunately, in this case those words come to mind. It wouldn’t surprise me if the Rooneys trade him. I think it might surprise a lot of people in the football fan world, but not people who have followed the Steelers for a long time. I know if you look at winning in the near future, it means prospects maybe dismal.
However, if you look at the long run, we will survive this folks, whatever the Rooneys chose to do
by newcastle,pa-gal on Apr 22, 2010 8:51 AM EDT reply actions
I bet you anything
he didn’t believe that he was indispensable.
by jakesinger777 on Apr 22, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions
My thoughts on trading Big Ben.
In all honesty, this may be the only time we can trade him and get anything in return.
Teams are looking at Ben’s “Best years” right now, and he is not being traded because of production, but off the field issues.
Why am I OK with this, and frankly a little hopeful it happens? A bunch of not conclusive estimates and opinions that you are free to assail.
1. Big Ben is going to drop off faster than other QB’s, He takes hits and is not cautious at all, add in his concussions and I think he’s not going to be great in three to four years.
2. QB’s that take a lot of sacks don’t play well in their 30’s. There are a lot of examples but the best correlative to Ben are Culpepper, Cunningham, Neil Lomax, Ken O’Brien. Big Ben could be the exception, but right now there aren’t any.
3. Look at last year, how often was Ben breaking out of tackles? He wasn’t, not nearly like he used too. His third down magic wasn’t happening. I can write off the third and long lack of heroics, that’s a number you can’t force to be good, but the breaking out of tackles and the failed last minute drives may be signs of a QB just starting down the other side of his peak. That would be a really short high point to a career, but that is not unprecedented.
Like I said not one of these is enough to get a conviction, but I just don’t have a good feeling about the rest of Ben’s career. And like I said, this is probably the only time you can get good value for him.
by Phantaskippy on Apr 22, 2010 8:55 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
How many concussions can one person take?
by newcastle,pa-gal on Apr 22, 2010 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions
44
"Now that I'm here, I don't want to just be here, I want to be here for a long time." Hines Ward, 1998 4th round draft pick.
by kick him in the head on Apr 22, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions
+1
If u mix Rick wests comments with phantaskippys comments I really like the idea I have always though bog Ben gets hurt to much and if we can get all that stuff from the raider it would be awesome
by celtsfan1 on Apr 22, 2010 9:28 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
where you been?
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Apr 22, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions
lol
I know what you mean. It is like being visited by a ghost.
And then we all woke up!
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Apr 22, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Elephant in the room (literally)
Isn’t it obvious that Ben doesn’t seem to take good care of himself physically. He has gotten bigger and bigger as the years have one on. He looks to have the body of a 30+ year old QB. And his drinking habits don’t help his physical condition.
So not only does he have to change his behavior when it comes to partying and getting into trouble, but also with respect to conditioning. Either one of those two could the last nail in his coffin as an elite QB.
What are the odds he does both? 50/50?
I mentioned this last season
That Ben was flabby & out of shape and everyone Booed me…but it was true. He had 3 chins. He looked like he had gained 50lbs and no one was making him work out. I compared the pictures of him 2 yrs prior, and was STUNNED!!
Just a thought
But are the Steelers using the charges against Ben as a pretext for a trade in which they maximize the worth of Big Ben?
Think about the following:
- Ben is just entering his prime at 28, his selling price will never be higher
- Ben has shown some frustration with the coaching at times last season something we know is a no-no in Pburgh
- Ben has a TREMENDOUS concussion history
- There seemed to be a bit of a rift, even if it was publicly denounced, last season when Ben sat out the Baltimore game
IF you add this up, maybe the Steelers are trying to sell high rather than end up releasing, or worse being forced to see Ben’s career shortened because of his head injuries.
I am Laura Nichols and I like Bacon.
BSD is an addiction, and this is the first step.
by carolinaeasy on Apr 22, 2010 8:59 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I really don't think we would be giving him up at this moment if it weren't for his messed up behavior
by newcastle,pa-gal on Apr 22, 2010 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions
No I think this situation
has provided the Steelers with an out. I agree they would not even consider doing this if Ben would not have been tangled up in this mess. But since he is and the throw in those other factors he is being shopped.
I am Laura Nichols and I like Bacon.
BSD is an addiction, and this is the first step.
by carolinaeasy on Apr 22, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Not sure where you get your facts
but I think the simple fact that Ben could go to another team and then come back to Pittsburgh and kick our butts is reason enough not to trade him.
What is there to look for? You didn’t see the sunday night interview and the flap with Hines Ward? There is the locker room rift i mentioned.
His concussion history is self explanitory
And the one issue I would have to look up is Ben talking about how he wanted more control of play calling ala a 2 minute attack, and some of the fall out when they wrestled with that issue. Not too much to dispute there.
I am Laura Nichols and I like Bacon.
BSD is an addiction, and this is the first step.
by carolinaeasy on Apr 22, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Great Write Up MB!
I certainly agree with many of the statements above. In fact, I have regularly compared the Steelers lean years from 81-04 as the Nation wandering in the desert in search of the Promised Land within these pages. Ben indeed was a Moses for the franchise and brought us great joy.
That said, Moses was not aloud to enter Israel. Perhaps our Moses will be banished. That is up to the Franchise God’s. What I will say is that I agree with everything you wrote MB. I always wondered after the 4 Lombardi’s of my youth "Will I ever see another Super Bowl as an adult? Like some dream about dancing at a daughter’s wedding I dreamed “Will I see the Steelers hoist the Lombardi one more time before I die?” I did! Twice. Thank you Ben and thank you Rooney’s.
If Ben is traded I too will soldier on as a proud member of the Steeler Nation. The Rooney’s are guiding this ship. They are human beings and fallible just like Big Stupid. Will they make a mistake? Possibly. But just as Ben will be ultimately judged down the road so will the Rooney’s. They will do what they think is right and I for one will back their play. Amen.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
The Key Question
Excellent article as always.
I also liked the objective analysis. Peter King wrote about this (before all of the trade rumors surfaced) saying that Art II had told him “Ben is going to change his life.” King said that he paused for a moment and said, “The easy part is saying those words.”
Basically the question comes down to this:
1. Is Ben just one of those spoiled athletes whose tremendous gifts on the field of play lead him to think that he has a unique sense of entitlement, meaning that he does not even need both with showing basic respect for women?
If this is the case, perhaps he can change.
However, the alternative is something darker.
2. Does Ben have some kind of pathological behavior issue, something on the order of Bill Clinton?
It is the Rooneys that have to answer this question.
In on line chats in the Post Gazette and on PG + I tried to ask Ed Bouchette and Gerry Dulac if the Steelers had perhaps uncovered something in their own investigations, or if perhaps with the DA report came out it was clear that Ben had not been completely forth coming when they asked him (as they certainly had to) “So, is there any other incident that we should know about before the press gets ahold of it?”
Unfortuantely Bouchette’s answer was not very insightful “I am sure the NFL’s crack securtiy team is looking into this” and Gerry Dulac did not take the question.
But reading between the lines, Dulac’s reporting seems to imply that something like what I outlined above is going on.
I guess I’d like to say I trust the Rooneys as much as Blitzburgh does, and to a certain extent I do.
But Ben Roethlisberger is a franchise quarterback. For every Ben Roethlisberger there are two Akili Smith’s, one Tim Couch, and several J.P. Lossmans.
The fact that Bill Cowher was 1-3 in AFC title games before Ben and 1-1 after Ben is no concidence. The fact that Bill Cowher was 0-1 in Super Bowls before Ben and 1-0 with Ben is no concidence.
Think of the final drive in Super Bowl XLIII. Could O’Donnell, Stewart, or Maddox have done that? Could Peyton Manning have?
If the Rooneys really think that Ben is a ticking time bomb then it is better to move him now, when his value is highest.
That is a hard question to answer, and I do not envy them.
by Hombre de Acero on Apr 22, 2010 9:37 AM EDT reply actions
My thoughts
I can certainly appreciate and trust the Rooney’s judgment whichever way we go on this, but there are two things to consider. First, the Steelers sucked until Dan began running the show, and they’ve been pretty good since. Art II is running things now, so he still has to prove himself in terms of being able to carry on the tradition that really started with his father. Second, if the Steelers do get rid of Ben, it will be a lot harder for me to get excited about the season. Of course, I’ll still be interested, but it won’t be the same. Does anyone really expect Leftwich or Dixon to be any better than O’Donnell, Stewart, Maddox, et al? Dixon is untested enough to have hope, but we know what Lefty is.
For ideas on statistical analyses, email me at wolfpacksteelersfan@gmail.com.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Apr 22, 2010 10:07 AM EDT reply actions
about the brand
Blitz,
An issue you didn’t mention about the Steelers brand is that they have the largest fanbase of women of any franchise. Partly that’s due to the football culture of Pittsburgh, where women are watching and routing on Sundays and not just in the kitchen making onion dip. It’s partly because it’s about football – not cheerleaders doing highkicks on the sidelines.
It’s about more than pink jerseys. It’s a fundamental connection to the life of Pittsburghers that gets families involved. It’s key to steelers football being a civic event in Pittsburgh.
Unfortunately for Ben, when Troy Polamalu points to his wedding band on national TV he, Troy, sets the standard by which others in the franchise are measured.
The media echo chamber is full of it
I remember a few months back reading an account of this one woman whose husband was running for president of some country in Europe. She was talking about how shocking and stupid and unexpected the stuff that would appear in the media was. That there would be people who would claim inside knowledge who she doesn’t recall even ever meeting. And reports of friends on the outs who had just been by for dinner the other night.
Just an endless stream of flat-out made-up bullshit to feed the printing press.
That’s what the Roethlisberger trade rumors are. The press needs a good story going into the draft. The Rooneys need to look like they really took the belt to Ben. It’s a win-win for everyone except the fans. And common sense.
No one on the receiving end is going to trade for Roethlisberger at anything except below value. If the Rooneys wanted to make business personal, some team will jump in and give them a second rounder in a heartbeat. But no one is going to bundle what it would take to trade honestly for a proven Super Bowl winner.
Great write up Blitz
I have stayed relatively quiet on the Big Ben issue. So many mega-bytes have been spilled and people have said some really insightful stuff. But I feel like I need to weigh in before the Rooney’s make a big decision. I for one agree with those that feel comfortable with trading Ben, if that’s what the Rooney’s decide. But I don’t think that’s it’s the only or or even best way for the Steelers to address this issue.
I don’t know Big Ben’s character very well. From the little that I’ve heard, that I feel I can any way trust, he sounds like a spoiled young man, who has some serious issues with how he behaves around women.
I imagine that some of that behavior may come from his life story. Ben’s parent’s divorced when he was 2. He was raised by his mother till he was 8 at which point she was killed in a car accident. No one can know another persons soul from the outside. But we can only imagine the pain and confusion of that type of childhood.
That of course doesn’t condone Ben’s behavior. No more than a childhood selling drugs on the street condones Tones. But we should remember these young men are often growing up under the full glare of the cameras. I think as fans we can demand that they act like adults while retaining compassion for them when they fail to.
As failures go, Ben’s strikes me as serious, but neither completely unforgivable nor uncommon. Although we don’t know what happened behind closed doors, we have a decent enough picture of that night in Georgia. Unless you truly believe that Ben was being maliciously set up by three 20 year old girls, than the story is simple and pretty unremarkable. Ben and his entourage bought drinks for the girls, got them drunk and then Ben had a sexual encounter with one of them in the bathroom. That encounter left no DNA – but likely caused some vaginal tearing. The woman was left confused and upset. Her friends felt so angry that they took her to the police to press charges.
The interesting thing about this story is that something like it happens so often in college bars across the country. Young women and young men drink a lot. Sex takes place without the full consent of the woman. Most of the times it won’t get reported. Most of the times, the woman will have to learn from the bitter and painful lesson – as she should – that one has to be careful and smart about protecting onesself.
But rarely does the guy learn in these situations. Rarely does the guy learn that it’s not OK to push too far when a girl says no, or get her too drunk to say no. My point is that we can hope that some good comes of this situation.
I don’t expect Big Ben to take a tour of college campuses and talk to atheltes about how to avoid getting themselves into trouble. Mind you, he wouldn’t be saying that he raped someone – he would be saying I put myself – and this young woman in a really bad situation. I want to teach you guys how to avoid that. I would be thrilled if he did. But I don’t expect it.
I do think the Steelers can use his situation to pass that very message along though. The six game suspension helped. Trading him would sort of pass that message along. Mainly it would reinforce the message that there are consequences for your behavior. Still I hope that if the Steelers don’t trade Ben, they can find a way to help the guy grow up. I hope too that they can help him help other troubled young men grow up.
I hope too that they can help him help other troubled young men grow up.
i agree completely. the only way i would want a trade to go down is if the rooney’s think there is better than a 50% chance another incident comes up were ben does something wrong & i’m sure the rooney’s are smart enough to realize this. i’m hoping one doesnt, but i dont know ben personally. the rooney’s do & i think they’re smart enough to make that decision
It all depends on Ben.
Nobody would expect the Steelers to put up with BB if he’s not sincere about changing his behavior. But that’s strictly between the Rooneys and Ben; nobody else can truly speculate as to the nature of their internal discussions. But if being a Steeler still is important to BB, I think the Rooneys will give him another chance.
Ben has not said anything.!
Ben, has not said anything and it maybe to his advantage. It seems in this world we are so quick to judge. It is based on the top headline. When Bush said, ’ Lets get Bin Ladin.’ the whole world got behind him. Years later rumors are submerging of him know about it before it happened. The world still is foolishly giving him credit as a good Prez. Well, Ben is innocent of rape. he is guilty of being stupid. To trade Ben is to be as ignorant as the people in this world. one of the reasons I like the Steeler’s is because they gave individuals a chance and an opportunity when no one else would. Ben’s name is being ran through the mud because of some young women who was dropping out of school. I said it before and I will say it again for the women sake they better not give been a chance If they do the whole world especially the ones who are writing these comments about cutting Ben etc. They will be on the hunt for this women. Ben will give the Steelers two more superbowls if he stays. As for integrity. I have plenty but my integrity is measured by the facts. Ben was accused and excused. We should all do the same. If he had raped that women he would be in jail. She should be in jail for slander, but she’ll get paid for it. Why because that’s just the way we are as a society. No way can she be a gold digger.
Hard Work Pays Off!!
Did you NOT read the 600 page report from the GBI???
Evidently you did not. Ben is not in jail because this young girl decided she did NOT want the prosecution to press charges & she would NOT testify. (After about a week, which I am sure she was paid off) But IF you had read the report, HER statement, Ben’s statement, and his BG’s & her friends……..for God’s sake, Ben ADMITTED to dropping his pants & exposing himself! He ADMITTED to being alone with her in the bathroom. I have NEVER agreed with Goodell on anything, but I agreed with him on this. This GBI report made me SICK. Ben has had 1 concussion too many, or he has always been like this. I didn’t believe the Tahoe incident, but now I have my doubts.
The young girl has no say whether to prosecute or not
And she would either be required to testify or go to jail (bench warrant) if she refused to testify. Just wanted to clarify that.
I love being the most-hated guy here. I love beating them while [their fans] are flicking me off. --Hines Ward
Trade him to the Clowns...I mean Browns
that way we can get a laugh at the both of you.
GO RAVENS!!!!!!!
I believe the Rooneys know what happened in GA
I think Ben told them the whole truth…he came clean with them/ was afraid not to. WE, the public, do not know the whole sorid details, but the Rooneys do. Now they have a dilemia to face……will the counseling help Ben or next spring will Ben do something like this again? What are their odds? If he does, it will ruin the Steelers. Can they chance that? That is why I think they will let him go.
I have been a fan for 35 years and I really believe they (Rooneys) would rather not win a SB for a few years than have their reputation tarnished. Plus, so many of their fans are women. I think Ben is going to be traded.

by 






























