More Important to the 2010 Steelers: Mendy or Wallace?
Sponsored Post: This post is presented by Sprint. Bringing you the first wireless 4G network from a national carrier. Only on the Now Network. - Michael Bean -
The Steelers offense enters the season with several questions marks, none bigger than the uncertainty at quarterback, but two players that will certainly play a huge part in determining whether or not this is a successful season will be Rashard Mendenhall and Mike Wallace. This will be Mendenhall's third training camp, but first that he enters as the starter and he'll have to prove that last year's 1,100 yard seven touchdown season was no fluke, especially considering the pressure that will be on the running game for the first four games of the season. Wallace also enters his first camp as a projected starter and last year's surprising rookie has some awful big shoes to fill as Hines Ward's counterpart. The Steelers will certainly need both young players to have good seasons but which one is more important?
- The Case for Mendy: Mendenhall won the starting tailback job just four games into last season and he went on to tally three 100 yard games and averaged at least 5.0 yards per carry in six of the remaining 13 games. Despite that success though, the Steelers are undoubtably asking for more from the third year back in 2010. Mendenhall will likely be asked to carry the ball 300+ times and should approach 1,500 yards this season, especially if he is effective early in the season while Big Ben is out. A case could easily be made that Mendy's effectiveness during Ben's absence is more important than whoever is taking the snaps as well. Either way you look at it, the Steeler offense is counting on a banner year from Rashard Mendenhall and if he struggles, it'll effect everyone on his side of the ball.
- The Case for Wallace: First, I'll admit that normally a starting tailback is much more important to a team's success than a team's 2nd wide reciever, especially if we're talking about the Steelers, but hear me out. First, I'm assuming that Hines Ward won't be starting 16 games this season (a feat he accomplished last year for the first time since 2004) and if that assumption holds true then we're looking at Wallace as this team's #1 wideout for at least a game if not many more. Secondly (and honestly this is something I can't prove but I feel fairly confident is true), Ward has been able to maintain his effectiveness well into his 30's at least partly because the Steelers have been able to take pressure off the veteran wideout by having a game changing reciever on the other side of the field (a role formerly filled by Santonio Holmes). If Wallace is unable to fulfill the same role, Ward could start getting more defensvie attention and the entire passing game could bog down. The second part of the case for Wallace has more to do with the rest of the depth chart. If Mendenhall were to go down with injury or simply fall flat on his face this season, it's not entirely crazy to think that the team could patch together a reasonably productive backfield from Mewelde Moore, Jonathan Dwyer and Isaac Redman (aka "The People's Training Camp Champ"), but the same can not be said if Wallace were to either get injured or simply be unproductive this season. Certainly no team with playoff aspirations, much less championship aspirations, can enter the January and/or February months with Antwaan Randle El or Arnaz Battle as a starting wide out. Making the jump from surprising rookie to above average starter in one season's time is a difficult task but that's exactly what the Steelers are expecting from Mike Wallace in 2010.
Certainly cases can be made for plenty of other veterans (Big Ben, Ward himself, Heath Miller, and probably either one of the OT's), but as far as young players who are absolutely crucial to the success of the 2010 Steelers, who ya got: Mendy or Wallace?
114 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think they both could be equally important
Mendy because while BB is out, teams will probably stack the box so it will be important for him to establish himself to open up the play actions. Then when BB gets back, he needs to be consistent so the threat of the run is still there and can take advantage if teams stop stacking the box. Wallace because if he can complement hines, then he will take some pressure of Hines. Also, if he proves to be more than just a deep threat, DCs will have something else to scheme for and worry about. So I think that with what they both can bring to the game, they both are not only important to the team’s success, but may also indirectly help each other out as well.
Things can always be worse....
I don't like the assumption
that Ward won’t be starting every game. Can see what yer saying but do not like it
"I sweat at the sound of hearing the names of Harrison and Woodley."- Mr MaLoR
by kick him in the head on May 27, 2010 2:52 PM EDT reply actions
I'd rather be optimistic
and wrong
"I sweat at the sound of hearing the names of Harrison and Woodley."- Mr MaLoR
by kick him in the head on May 28, 2010 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions
both contributing factors...
1. Mendy has the most weight to carry now (might split time w/ Dwyer)
2. Wallace is the # 2 reciever now and will carry his amount on the O just as much as Mendy.
The bottom line both will be vital for us to flourish this season, and if they falter in anyway we might have to piggyback on the D in more ways than one!
"In Hoc Signo Vinces (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!!!") -Constantine I
It all depends on BA
If BA sticks with his stupid pass heavy offense, then it is Wallace. But if he is smart enough to realize that without our premiere signal caller we are much better off running, it will be Mendy.
I voted for Mendy, because I hope that happens.
"I'm from Maryland, no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on May 27, 2010 3:05 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I'm kind of surprised Mendenhall is winning
I thought the numbers would be turned around.
The league has seen in recent years rookie RBs and unknowns coming in and doing ok. There are a lot of them and it’s a by-committee position. Mendenhall is something special but you also have a savvy vet, two promising 2nd-year players (counting Summers who could play TB in a pinch), and an intriguing rookie.
Meanwhile at the WR position we have a couple of veteran WR’s who can find the holes in zones in Ward, ARE, and (at TE) Miller. But the only proven guy who can stretch the field and cause match up problems in man coverage is Wallace. He goes down and you have a couple of raw rookies and unknown street free agents.
In my mind our offense takes a hit if we lose either but we lost both of the other players at Wallace’s flanker position this offseason so depth is the bigger issue. Even in Wallace’s role is minimized if we run more, we’ll still have to throw to win some games and having little behind him will be an issue.
+1
Losing Wallace IMO would be a much bigger impact than losing Mendenhall.
by SteelerMessican on May 29, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
defenitely Wallace more important to you
In this league, it’s not that difficult to find a 1000 yard back, and you know that Mendenhall is a 1000 yard back at the very least. He may or may not blossom into a real star this year, but at the very least he’s no bust. So you should be good on that one.
Wallace is the bigger unknown for you. You’ve seen flashes of a great player, but not as a #1 receiver and not without Santonio keeping defenses honest. Personally, Wallace scares me. But what none of us know is if he’s ready to carry a passing attack week in and week out. With this being his first full season in that role, I’m guessing he has his amazing games and he has his duds.
Side Note: You may consider Wallace to be a #2, but he’ll get #1 defensive assignments against a lot of defenses who aren’t as worried about Hines Ward as they used to be.
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
now that i look at it...
i hope emanuel sanders can pick up the # 3 or # 4 spot and hold his own and go as a sleeper as wallace did last year…
"In Hoc Signo Vinces (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!!!") -Constantine I
by Webslasher81 on May 27, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions
not telling you its impossible
but its hard to strike gold with WRs that often. who knows though
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
by jackmca on May 27, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i hear ya...
I am still not over the whole “Tone” trade to the Jets…I guess i am wishfully thinking, I just hope to God, that sanders isn’t another sweed lol!!!
"In Hoc Signo Vinces (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!!!") -Constantine I
by Webslasher81 on May 27, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions
then again...
emanuel sanders played that “run and gun” offense in June Jones’s system he could be beast or could be a flop…all that i know is that he will most likely be getting touches in the special teams dept. hopefully…
"In Hoc Signo Vinces (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!!!") -Constantine I
by Webslasher81 on May 27, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions
but then again...
stefan logan will not adhere kindly to that notion lol!!!
"In Hoc Signo Vinces (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!!!") -Constantine I
by Webslasher81 on May 27, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions
yea, expecting two rookie WR's in a row to be really good isn't a smart bet
not to mention we’re talking about guys who weren’t very early picks. I’m not saying that Sanders is going to be a bust but expecting him to have a “Wallace-type” season isn’t a good idea. Most WR’s take time to adjust to the NFL game.
Yeah he should be gone after this year
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on May 27, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Speath...
idk man…but anything is a possiblity! lol…
"In Hoc Signo Vinces (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!!!") -Constantine I
by Webslasher81 on May 27, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
maybe with a true fullback, spaeth can be used more as a receiving TE. He did alright in that role his rookie season
"all my bitches, take some shots!"
You may be on to something there
You know it, I know it but does B.A. know it? More importantly, even if he does know it, will he be too stinkin stubborn to use the formation. With the relative uncertainty in the receiving corps, this strategy could prove to be the key to success for the entire season.
+1
"I don't know if I've got the vocabulary to explain that family. Art, the Chief, Dan, they reek of class, they're fair, they're giving, they're genuine, they're stern and the reputation they have established, that organization, to be that consistent all these years, at the end of the day it speaks to the top, it speaks to how the Rooney's carry themselves, and the things they have done." - Merril Hoge
by chewiesteeler on May 27, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah, i mean the guy IS 6’8" The fact that he doesn’t get more looks in the redzone either means he can’t get open or Arians doesn’t want to use him like that. I’m just going with the latter ‘cause we’ve seen Spaeth catch TDs before.
"all my bitches, take some shots!"
From what I have seen
B.A. is intent on leaving him in there as a blocking Tight End and he continually gets torn apart by defenders. I don’t get it. It is infuriating to watch. I’ve told the story before but, each year at training camp, I have watched Spaeth on some of the blocking drills where the guys (OL & TEs) have to get low, get leverage and explode. He looks pathetic in that drill. If I can see that why in the wide world of sports can B.A.?
"I don't know if I've got the vocabulary to explain that family. Art, the Chief, Dan, they reek of class, they're fair, they're giving, they're genuine, they're stern and the reputation they have established, that organization, to be that consistent all these years, at the end of the day it speaks to the top, it speaks to how the Rooney's carry themselves, and the things they have done." - Merril Hoge
by chewiesteeler on May 27, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
of course ya would...MaLoR
lol!
"In Hoc Signo Vinces (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!!!") -Constantine I
by Webslasher81 on May 27, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s because you know a first ballot HoF player when you see one.
by Phantaskippy on May 27, 2010 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions
I voted other
If the OL does not make great strides this year, the 1st four games are going to be lots of 8 in the box, so I guess it will be Wallace.
If the OL does then they’ll run the first four games out, like the Cowher years, and play a possesion passing game and it will be Mendy.
I’m voting for the latter, could you imagin Ben with and OL and a running game?
Heck while I’m at it toss in a top 5 D, better start fitting the guys for SB rings during the bye.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
Mendenhall.
First, I’ll admit that normally a starting tailback is much more important to a team’s success than a team’s 2nd wide reciever, especially if we’re talking about the Steelers, but hear me out.
I did, but it couldn’t change my mind. Now, if you were simply arguing whether the running game or passing game was more important, there’d be a closer argument. But I see this year (hopefully, anyway) as the year we return to the run.
Hey, an out is an out - unless you're Mario, in which case it's probably two outs. -UtesFan89
Hard work always beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.
I guess my main point was this....
In my mind the running game with Mendy could be an 8 or maybe a 9 but with some combo of the rest of the guys we’re probably sitting at like a 6.
With the same exercise, I think the passing game could about the same 8-9 range with Wallace but without I think we fall below a six.
Mendy
Even before the BB issue, the Front Office went on record as saying that we had to get back to basics and the running game. I think that right there points to Mendy. Then adding in the 4 – 6 games that BB will be out; I think it’s fair to say the running game will get an even bigger chunk of the pie early on. If we have to rely on the balance of the roster (in the scenario cgolden mentions above), then I think we lose a lot of effectiveness because we’ll become predictable: one of Mendy’s strengths is catching out of the backfield – that speaks to MM (who is not as strong actually running)….Dwyer and Redman can run, but can they catch the swing pass?
That’s not to say that Wallace isn’t important. He’ll have his own hurdles this year, and needs to step up his game accordingly. I would think the ball gets distributed more with Tone gone, and Heath to get a lot more balls. Hopefully we add the play action pass to our playbook – that’s something Wallace would excel at, but I see a lot more dump offs and swing passes this year. Less reliance on the deep pass.
everything you said is pretty accurate but my one question is this....
Even before the BB issue, the Front Office went on record as saying that we had to get back to basics and the running game. I think that right there points to Mendy.
While the front office certainly has a say in whether or not BA has a job, they don’t have a say in the play calls and BA has never really shown a dedication to the running game. I hope he does change his stripes but I’ll have to see it to believe it.
I read an article that said they have been running some 2 back sets in OTAs
Things can always be worse....
I am trying to remember
but i think it may have been different looks..I-formation, maybe some split back and they used different combinations IIRC. i think i read that in the Trib or maybe the Post-Gazette, not sure…my memory is not what it used to be…
Things can always be worse....
Great point.
Just because the Rooney’s went on record as saying it, doesn’t mean that BA will DO it. I just took it for granted that because they said it, and BB/Coach T stood up for him to keep his job, that he would be wise enough to see the writing on the wall.
If a boss says he wants things done a diffrent way
I sure would try to meet his demands
I'm getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.
We just dumped a problem WR just so we could draft another?
I just read an article in the Post that WyoFan has a link to
and it’s not sounding as if BA has quite learned how to committ to the run….can I really be wrong this quickly? Damn
I know this is about Mendy and Wallace
but saw this article and thought the Nation might be interested in it. I know it is by La Canfora(sp), but maybe his prediction is right
http://blogs.nfl.com/2010/05/27/roethlisberger-could-return-to-practice-begin-repairing-image/
Things can always be worse....
He needs a code red
when he gets to training camp.
"I don't know if I've got the vocabulary to explain that family. Art, the Chief, Dan, they reek of class, they're fair, they're giving, they're genuine, they're stern and the reputation they have established, that organization, to be that consistent all these years, at the end of the day it speaks to the top, it speaks to how the Rooney's carry themselves, and the things they have done." - Merril Hoge
by chewiesteeler on May 27, 2010 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Obviously Mendy
Wallace, while Important, is a receiver. And a receiver hardly ever is more valuable than an RB.
With no running game you have no passing game in most instances…
And many teams have won without an epic godly lineup at WR. See 05 Steelers, every Pats SB, Bucs super bowl, the list goes on
And many teams have won without an epic godly lineup at WR. See 05 Steelers, every Pats SB, Bucs super bowl, the list goes on
So are you saying that recent SB winners had “epic godly” running backs? Saints, Steelers (both years), Colts, Pats (three times), Bucs? None of those teams had truly great running backs by any means. Who is the best of those backs? FWP? Corey Dillon? Micheal Pittman?
Think of the “great” runningbacks of this decade (LT, Westbrook, Adrian Peterson, Shaun Alexander), none of them have rings. In fact the best back to actually win a ring this decade is probably Jamal Lewis.
great Defenses and/or QB’s seem to be a strong indicator of SB success….
anyways, I really think Mendy is more important this season than wallace. At the beginning of the season, Mendy will be super important,
and WR’s do not really make a avg QB look better, but a great QB will make his WR’s look better, if that makes any sense. So, when Ben gets back, I think we know what to expect from the passing game, imo.
I’d say FWP in 2004 is right up there with Jamal Lewis in 2000. Lewis might have had about 150 more yards that season, but FWP had a higher YPC and had to share a lot more carries with Bettis. That combo FWP/Bettis was probably the best RB combo to win a SB in recent history.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on May 28, 2010 8:21 AM EDT up reply actions
I'd have to say the best back
to win a ring this decade would be future HOFer Jerome Bettis. But you knew that.
"I don't know if I've got the vocabulary to explain that family. Art, the Chief, Dan, they reek of class, they're fair, they're giving, they're genuine, they're stern and the reputation they have established, that organization, to be that consistent all these years, at the end of the day it speaks to the top, it speaks to how the Rooney's carry themselves, and the things they have done." - Merril Hoge
by chewiesteeler on May 28, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions
but not at the time he won his ring. career-wise, there’s no question, but he was well past his prime at that point.
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
Debatable
He had just had a 950 yard season the previous year in 15 games and on 6 starts (that includes five games with less than 8 carries). Moreover, he was still a monster short yardage back that couldn’t be stopped in 05.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on May 28, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions
What's up Steeler fans
I think Mendenhall is probably the more essential of the two, he’s got a lot of speed
This year is going to be one heck of a ride! Looking forward to it!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on May 27, 2010 5:57 PM EDT reply actions
Yea, Wallace ain’t that fast.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on May 27, 2010 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Still
You need a running that has proven himself before. With Ben out you guys are going to have to run the ball hard (unless dixon starts playing incredible, who knows)
This year is going to be one heck of a ride! Looking forward to it!!!
by Panther4Life!!! on May 27, 2010 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions
So Mendy’s 1000 yard season last year didn’t prove anything?
Mendy is not a burner. Also, I wouldn’t use that argument about speed, because Wallace has world class speed you only see once every 5 years.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on May 28, 2010 8:24 AM EDT up reply actions
Now
you see what I deal with here in NC.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Jun 2, 2010 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions
I love the NFL films on the Cards' run to the SB (where they lost).
the Panthers fan is in the stands yelling “THEYRE GON THROW IT TO ELEB’N, FOX!!” Schematic genius abounds in NC.
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
I hope you are being sarcastic.
Wallace is one of the fastest players on the team. maybe the fastest, but Antonio Brown is debating that.
The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.
by steeler junky on May 28, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions
he was definitely being sarcastic
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
Mike Wallace is going to have a great year
But the Steelers need to run the ball. That’s what we’re known for.
Depending on the situation, it should be: run first, then pass.
Everyone has a right to be stupid. I just abuse the privilege.
Quitter's Proud United Member #11
I liked this post, btw
I think it is a fair and interesting question
In my opinion, I think Wallace is going to be more important for you guys. As much as many of you may deny it, Holmes leaving really, really hurts your offense. He was by far your most dangerous player over the last two years. Even I know that Mendenhall is going to have a very solid year if he can stay healthy. The yards are going to come with him, he is too talented to have a Brandon Jacobs like season.
With Wallace however, the Holmes departure forces him into the #2 spot. With Ward starting to ease his way out of the #1 spot and into retirement, Wallace has to step it up…..big time. If he does not click during the first half or so of the season, then that leaves you with what? Ward who is still solid, but not dangerous enough to be THAT big of a factor in a win. Randle El, god knows what he can anymore. The rookie Sanders, I highly you guys will even see half the production Wallace gave you last year out of Sanders. I was a huge Mike Wallace fan while he was at Ole Miss. I knew this guy was going to be a beast. When you guys drafted him, I knew it meant premature aging and gray hair for me over the next 8 years.
Wallace has to step up, or I think your offense is screwed. As great as a productive running game is, having a below average passing attack in today’s league is going to get you no where. And considering who is going to be your QB for the first quarter of the season, you better hope Wallace is getting wide open every time.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
by Mr MaLoR on May 28, 2010 12:31 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
The standard for expectation does not change.
JP Losman could be our starting QB, Tim Couch our starting RB and I would still expect a playoff spot, and a chance at the SB. We will weather the Holmeless roster.
And as a fan, I would hope you think that way. With your defense, that should be enough to get to the Superbowl.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
+1
Damnit all, why is the Ravens fan making sense to me?
I agree that we lost our #1 playmaker by getting rid of Wake and Bake Holmes.
BUT… I think the Steelers of today could be geared for a slightly different offense than that of last year. I think Heath Miller is still under-utilized and Hines Ward is still the best possession receiver in the game when teams choose to run zone against the Steelers. If Mendy can step up and shoulder the load and put us in primarily 3rd and shorts? We can become a ball control offense with the deep threat of Wallace over the top keeping the defense honest.
This will require a fundamental shift in playcalling and execution. But with Ben out 4-6 games I think we’ll see that shift and if we’re winning with it? Then we’ll let all the critics start calling Ben a game manager (who just happens to win games when he’s called upon).
by Chicago Steeler on May 28, 2010 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm concerned they aren't going to change the offense
I thought Bad Boy Ben called his own plays a lot more last year and I just don’t think the offense is going to change. I’ll believe it when I see it. Also, wasn’t the loss of FWP planned for in some ways. I think Wake and Bake Holmes (I like that name, reminds me of my youth) departure was a lot more reactive than planned out. Plus, Mendy has already shown us he can be a number one. Wallace will have a lot more to prove.
by Norcal_Roxy on May 28, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Great Question
You pose a great question CGolden. Both players are key, but a lot depends on the guys below him. What if Gibson is another Wallace? Not likely. I’ve always been a big Mewelde Moore fan, although I think we saw some of his limits last year. I guess a lot depends on Dwyer. If this kid is for real and shows he can contribute, it is probably more likely that the team manages to absorb a loss to Mendenhall rather than Wallace…..
by Hombre de Acero on May 28, 2010 7:18 AM EDT reply actions
I have to vote for mendy
Only because if Mendy went down Arians would have an excuse to throw the ball more and an excuse to why the running game failed at important times, like in the Red zone and 3d down conversions again this season.
The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.
good question
I chose Mendy but, with Ben out and Holmes gone, I think we will need them both at their best for the next 6 games (I expect Ben back in 4 but I think it will take a couple of games to shake the cobwebs out).
How do I break it to the cat that since he has been declawed, the rabbit he sees in our backyard would kick his sorry butt?
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on May 28, 2010 9:45 AM EDT reply actions
Neither - it depends on Pouncey & Hartwig
If Pouncey and Hartwig can open some room to run, Mendy will be a pro-bowler. If he’s getting stuffed…we’re ‘up the creek’…
nooooooo
they deleted my main MAN!
Open the wardrobe is not yet found love after
another the right clothes?
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
You guys might like this. It is a list of overrated and underrated players in the NFL. Here is what this idiot had to say about your Steelers.
Overrated: S Troy Polamalu. Yes, he has been hurt. But that helps bring down his rating. Even when he has been on the field, he hasn’t been as good as his reputation.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
ahh, the offseason
writers are struggling to fill space, so this is when the hackiest articles come out
"all my bitches, take some shots!"
by dankdiggety on May 28, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
and fatass peter king writes more about his damn coffee than usual
sorry clicked post before I could add that
"all my bitches, take some shots!"
by dankdiggety on May 28, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Peter King only cares about the money makers in the NFL. So the Patriots, Cowboys, and Colts are going to always be his favorite teams because they rub lime on his nipples when he writes good about them.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
thanks for that image
now I need to go wash out my brain…
"You know how football is - if your mother's on the other team and you're coming out to play football, you're gonna hit momma" --L.C. Greenwood
your signature
is the single most amazing quote i have ever seen.
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
L.C. Greenwood
was a special kind of player
How do I break it to the cat that since he has been declawed, the rabbit he sees in our backyard would kick his sorry butt?
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Jun 1, 2010 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions
in other words
he doesn’t watch football
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on May 28, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Even as a Ravens fan, I can admit that Troy is the best defensive player in the NFL. The best open field tackler I have seen since Ray Lewis came in the league and can cover as good as most Free Safeties in this league. Just do not get how Troy, a 2 time Superbowl champion and the most important player on your defense has not lived up to his reputation.
You have to hate losing more than you love winning.
I don't know
Ravens have Ed Reed he is a game changer too!
The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.
by steeler junky on May 28, 2010 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions
IDK
Revis can cover an airplane, and don’t forget about Mr. Reed.
Bringing Baltimore Beatdown "Create a Caption" for 7 weeks and counting.
by Zachary Beard on May 29, 2010 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions
"even as a Ravens fan, I can admit that Troy is the best defensive player in the NFL"
The funny thing is that usually national writers or fluff writers will only watch the big games. Well week 1 last year Titans at Steelers was a big game. Everyone watched it. Troy was only out for about 20 minutes and made two super-human plays and a couple other great ones! If that’s all you had to go by, I think that would cement his rep. And the two games before that one? Making the game-winning pick 6 in the AFC Title Game and then winning a Superbowl!
He played, 1 1/2 games injured this year? He still had at least one pick that I can remember during that stint.
Seriously, what else on Earth could a safety do to earn a good rep?
I’m not offended by such nonsense, but this is rather funny.
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
Given the constraints of this question....
The more important of the 2 for the 2010 season is Mendy.
- Mendy will need to carry the burden of the O during the 1st 4 games and perhaps…even more. Once BB is back, he will require transition time and Mendy will bridge that gap as well.
- Mendy will need to continue to provide great pass protection during passing downs, max protection sets. His blocking should give Leftwich that extra 1/2 sec for that wind up of h is
- Mendy will need to catch enough flare passes to account for the drop off in receiving talent minus Santonio.
Mendy will be asked to do these 3 things and these things very well…..run, pass protect, and catch. Wallace will not be asked to do that much…..hence making him not as important………..YET
Wallace is extremely important, but not as much as Mendy for this 2010 season.
I have to go with Mendy on this because although he has speed to burn I don’t know if Wallace @this stage of his development is ready to run precision routes, during the S.B. run in every playoff game Holmes made some play to change the game with his yac ability. I also read that Holmes was 2nd in the nfl in % of catches that went for 1rst downs a whopping 79% 2nd only to Jackson of S.D. that kind of production will be hard to replace having said all of that with the return of Foote, Smith & of course Troy &any improvement on special teams I think the steelers will hoist their 7th Lombardi trophy this year I cannot wait for the year to start.
Speed Kills
I voted for Wallace because if he shows good hands early in the season, with his speed, defenses will be forced to keep a safety back deep. I think that combined with more two back formations will help us sustain more drives with a higher conversion percentage on 3rd downs. Plus it never hurts to have him make a few DeSean Jackson like 50 yard pass plays each game. If he can command a lot of attention he will be the key in games against teams like Tennessee, New Orleans, Cincinnatti, and Baltimore who rely on breaking early on pass plays to create turnovers.
Good Post Gold
I voted Mendenhall because the Steelers will have to be able to run the ball to win…especially the first month. As a wise man once said “When you run the ball, good things happen…”
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
God Darn
People at BB don’t talk. I’m coming over here for a while. BTW I pick Mendenhall. The reason Wallace was good last year was because he was in the slot. This year being a #2 WR he will actually have good CBs on him, and alot of times he will be double covered. Mendenhall on the other hand will be the Starting HB on a team that won’t have a good QB for the first 6 games. I think they will become more of a running team without Ben. And that’s where Mendy comes in.
Bringing Baltimore Beatdown "Create a Caption" for 7 weeks and counting.
Welcome aboard
but beware. Eventually you will end up coming over to the black and gold side.
How do I break it to the cat that since he has been declawed, the rabbit he sees in our backyard would kick his sorry butt?
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on May 29, 2010 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions
I will never join the Darkside
Bringing Baltimore Beatdown "Create a Caption" for 7 weeks and counting.
by Zachary Beard on May 29, 2010 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Wallace will definitely be important, given that with either Leftwich or Dixon starting for 4-6 games, we’re going to need a good WR next to Hines to give our passing game some life for those games.
However, even more important is Mendenhall’s ability to run well for at least those 6 games, because if he’s unable to handle that load, then all the pressure moves to our passing game, which likely will handle the pressure poorly without Ben. However, if Mendenhall’s able to play well enough, then we can keep our offense fluid, and at least keep ourselves in contention until Ben comes back.
Great teams overcome adversity in any situation. This is a great team coached by a great coach. Sit back and watch this amazing team plug in the right people to do the job.
Mexico loves the Steelers because they are a tough non-quiting team.
i guess every other team in the NFL is a bunch of quitter/panzies.
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
Just the ravens
"I sweat at the sound of hearing the names of Harrison and Woodley."- Mr MaLoR
by kick him in the head on Jun 1, 2010 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions
i think you know better than that...
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
i think i do too..
hey are you guys picking up Shayne Grahm?
"I sweat at the sound of hearing the names of Harrison and Woodley."- Mr MaLoR
by kick him in the head on Jun 1, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions
bummer dude
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
Mr Underbridge?
6th round draft choice. RB. Looks like he has potential.
How do I break it to the cat that since he has been declawed, the rabbit he sees in our backyard would kick his sorry butt?
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Jun 3, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions
He came with the Washer
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill
Wallace by a hair
If both stay healthy then I would say Mendy but if either falters due to injury then I vote for Wallace as gut feeling is Dwyer & Co could come closer to filling Mendy’s role & production than those next in line in the receiving corp.

by 


































