Pittsburgh Steelers Training Camp Primer: The Tight Ends
Comcast has generously agreed to support the best NFL community around -- us! As part of that effort, between now and the end of the 2010 NFL season Comcast will be sponsoring a variety of special editorial and interactive features on our site. They begin today with the launch of the Comcast HD War Room, your weekly destination for key draft insight and opinion.
***********
Let's get our minds off Big Ben and back on football by continuing with our breakdowns of each and every positional battle that will sort itself out when the Pittsburgh Steelers open their 2010 training camp in Latrobe, Pennsylvania. We began with the quarterback competition, now let's move on to one of the few positions on either side of the ball where there's not a whole lot at stake come training camp - the tight ends
Overview
The depth chart at tight end hasn't changed since former Purdue grad Eugene Bright was signed to the Steelers' practice squad in late November of last year. When Sean McHugh, the team's third TE in 2008, suffered an injury last summer, rookie David Johnson took advantage of earned a helmet as the team's third TE behind Heath Miller and Matt Spaeth. Will Johnson be able to hold off McHugh again this year? Or is that even the only possibility for change in the depth chart? Could Johnson or McHugh supplant Spaeth as the No. 2 TE? As uncomplicated as the situation at tight end is, there are I suppose a few potential developments that could surprise us in the coming months.
The Man
That would be Heath Miller, the Steelers' first round draft pick out of Virginia in 2005. The Steelers could easily have decided to wait to see how the pending labor situation unfolded rather than offering Miller a lengthy contract extension last summer. Because of the expiration of the previous Collective Bargaining Agreement, Miller would not have been an unrestricted free agent at the end of the 2009 season, his fourth year in the league. Instead he would have had to accrue at least one more year, meaning the Steelers could have likely retained his services for less money in at least 2010.
That's not how the Steelers operate though. When it's time to let a guy walk, they let him walk. When it's time to make smart, fair, long-term investments in players, they do that too.
Miller certainly repaid the Steelers for their act of good faith last season. He posted career highs in receptions (76) and receiving yards (789), and his six TD receptions matched his second highest total set back during his rookie season in '05. Miller was particularly productive in the early part of the season, hauling in 34 receptions and 4 TDs through the Steelers' first six games.
Though Miller missed two games due to injury in 2008, there's no reason to think he won't appear in and start 14-16 games again in 2010. And while he may not exceed his statistical outputs from a year ago, it's not inconceivable to see him setting new highs in '10, if for no other reason than that he may see even more opportunities now that Santonio Holmes is no longer on the squad.
Contending For The No. 2 Role
- Matt Spaeth
There's a running joke in Steeler Nation about how offensive coordinator Bruce Arians loves him some two tight end sets. Because Arians prefers single 'back formations (no fullback), an additional tight end is often used for blocking purposes. Unfortunately, the Steelers offense hasn't had much success utilizing Matt Spaeth effectively in the myriad snaps that he's on the field. In other words, if you're going to play Spaeth on so many plays, might it make more sense to actually force defenses to account for him when the Steelers do pass rather than run? I'm not sure, I don't have gobs of film available at the moment to analyze to see how he's used. But despite playing in all 16 games last year, Spaeth had just five receptions. One resulted in a TD in Week 1, but after that, Spaeth was mostly invisible.
Spaeth showed his ability as a pass-catching tight end when he started in place of an injured Heath Miller for two games during the '08 season. He snagged 6 passes in each of the two starts for a combined 108 receiving yards. In the event of an unlikely and unfortunate injury to Miller, Spaeth could be entrusted to at least know his assignemnts and make the occasional play thanks to having been in Arians' system for all three of his first professional seasons.
- David Johnson
If Johnson was hoping to supplant Spaeth has the No. 2 TE on the roster, he has to be disappointed with how his spring has materialized thus far. Johnson has reportedly dropped quite a few passes during OTAs this past month or so. Not good. That said, his utility for the Steelers would lie in his blocking ability, not being a playmaker, so if he can have a strong camp once the pads go on, there's still hope for him to make an impression on Mike Tomlin and Arians.
He probably should be more worried about retaining the No. 3 role rather than having any ideas of rising the ranks of the depth chart. Despite his struggles this spring, Johnson has seen more reps than has McHugh or Bright.
- Sean McHugh
Not sure what to say about McHugh other than you have to feel bad that he suffered an injury when he did a year ago. Had he not, he most likely retains his roster spot over Johnson last season. Used essentially like a FB in 2008, McHugh now faces extra competition from the likes of Tank Summers and even Jonathan Dwyer.
Who do you think makes the final cut - Johnson, McHugh, Bright? I suppose we got an idea of what the Steelers perceive Spaeth's value to be when they offered him the lowest tender possible this winter. I still would imagine he makes the squad though. He's cheap, he's familiar with the playbook and he's the best pass-catching option behind Miller. Johnson could have the edge despite his struggles this spring due to the fact that he's demonstrated a toughness and physicality in the running game. If the Steelers are in fact serious about running more this year, they might be wise to have Johnson in the mix.
Previous Primers
54 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I like how "Will Johnson" was auto-linked to a Ravens D-lineman
1). Miller
2). Spaeth
3). Johnson
PS). Bright for now, maybe replacing him with another body during the season depending on what’s available (dude is 3 years older than Johnson) but that’s looking way downtown
Sorry McHugh :-(
lool
just saw that. nice eyes.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Jun 10, 2010 4:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Nice article Blitz
I would say Heath gets under 75 recs based on that we are going to transition back to a run first team.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
Yes, but, short passes are part of the run game
So, while I picked “over” I really think it will be closer to the same, maybe nearing 80.
There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark
by chewiesteeler on Jun 10, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions
I'd say 60-65
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm going to say
78.6
There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark
by chewiesteeler on Jun 10, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions
I'd say over 20 for sure
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions
So you aren’t sick, that’s good.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Not anymore
thanks for caring :)
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Jun 10, 2010 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought what Rooney meant was more emphasis on effective running
we are going to transition back to a run first team.
Is there mention from MT or BA that their looking to be run first? Or are you looking at just the first four games? At one point I think you linked to football outsider, and that page mentions You run when you win, not win when you run
What indicates the steelers will be run first?
That article is pointing out just because you run, doesn’t mean you will win. You actually have to have good personnel to be successful. So I would say you win when you run successfully. I think we have all the components of a team that can run well. A RB who is a triple threat: run, catch, and block. Potential power backs behind him in Dwyer, Tank, or Redman. Also, a proven reliable 3rd down, sure hands back in MeMo. We have 5 good OL, with no glaring weaknesses. I believe our Guards and RT excel in run blocking. Teams will think we want to pass more this year.
I think when Rooney said he wanted to run more effectively, he meant he wanted to run more. Clearly, our run offense was not awful, as it had a 4.6 ypa with Spin Dr. in the game. “More effective” to me, means running on 1st down more often, sticking to more runs on short yardage to go, running more in the red zone/ & goal situations, and relying more on the run to close out games.
Sure they never said “we are going to be a run first team”, but who would tip their hand that transparently?
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Thanks Johnny
That makes a lot of sense. And of course, there has to be a certain confidence that BA will make use of the running assets you mentioned. We’ll have to see.
Another thing mentioned on that page is about running on short yardage and third downs being statistically more successful than passing, so I catch your drift. thanks for taking the time to walk me through it.
Cheers!
You have to wonder though
If the team fails on offense again this year, who will the Rooney’s be quicker to boot out the door? BA or Tomlin?
I’d assume BA is automatically gone, but it can’t put good faith in the Rooney’s if Tomlin lets something like that happen again.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Probably depends on How MT handled keeping BA
I think we know that Ben was campaigning for him, but how much was MT lobbying to keep him? If he expressed his doubts or misgivings during that process, but ultimately favored keeping him, maybe not so bad.
But if he lobbied hard for keeping him, then he is vulnerable and culpable for whatever BA does as it makes his judgment/assessment look weak.
Part if me feels BA will make positive adjustments to approach, but another part of me feels he still will under-utilize his assets
I have a feeling BA is gone after this year either way
I think its the end of his contract and I have a feeling he retires
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions
i'd expect it to go the other way
TEs and slot receivers are most likely to be open and they’re typically the easiest receivers for new QBs/bench QBs to throw to.
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
agreed
That’s why I picked the over (I think 75-85). I think Leftwich/Dixon will use him alot, then when Ben gets back, Heath will help BB get his rhythm back. I think he gets more TD receptions this year, too.
My 5-year old daughter even hates the Ravens.
by SundaysWithTroy on Jun 10, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions
nice thought
Heath should be a dependable target for BB to look for coming off the suspension
"I sweat at the sound of hearing the names of Harrison and Woodley."- Mr MaLoR
by kick him in the head on Jun 13, 2010 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions
I think Spaeth takes a lot of crap from fans because his blocking is pretty bad. But whenever Miller is injured he’s filled in pretty admirably. Good pick by the Steelers who will probably be allowed to walk when his time is up.
No way Miller gets more than 75 receptions. Not without Ben for 4 games.
I think he gets more attention without ben
the TE is the secruity blanket for the QB and is a easier read, from what I understand. They may rely on Heath more.
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Jun 10, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
This
+1
There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark
by chewiesteeler on Jun 10, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
On the other hand, if the running game is what the rooney’s want (more than last year), and limiting the pass plays for 2nd and 3rd string qb’s to improve the ground game, there’s a possibility that It might be under 75 over the course of the 16 game regular season. Who really knows how it will unfold.
Just sayin’
Don't forget Santonio's catches.
Wallace likely won’t make them all against a # 2 Corner, at least not this year. Even if the O cuts back on the total tosses, Health is likely to gain some from this area.
I also agree with SundaysWithTroy right above, that whomever starts the first games will rely on Heath, and then BB will do the same to get back in step. I think this year could be huge for Heath.
TE rotation
Have to keep Spaeth as he is only viable backup to heath, however, he shouldn’t dress unless miller is out. The true #2 blocking TE should go to a guy who can hold his own on the end of the L-O-S, and at least require some attention when they release into secondary…not a full-back/hybrid type. Not sure if Steelers have anyone close to this description on roster. Need to employ a true FB for backfield duties and find a true blocking TE on waiver wire or just cut Johnson/McHugh and go with tackle eligible on running downs. Hybrid TE’s are really good at nothing.
by steelerwheeler on Jun 10, 2010 10:47 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
agreed
on the gameday active side of this.
I think Mchugh could be that 2nd LOS TE guy. He’s basically the same size as Heath.
Johnson is smaller and is more of the H-back size
by Steely McSmash on Jun 10, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Heath Miller is definitely going to see under 75 receptions. The Steelers are going to run more next year to appease their fan base, and with Miller as the best blocking tight end on the team, he’s not going to see a lot of throws. Expecting about 4-5 catches a game from him would mean we’re throwing the ball 30-40 times. That’s not going to happen.
Pittsburgh sports all the way
I'm not sure the Steelers are focused on appeasing the fan base.
They’re focused on winning, and winning appeases the fan base. Having said that, as long as BA is calling your shots, he’ll do what he wants to do and historically that has been pass. We may see a deviation from that during the Leftwich games (assuming he gets the nod) but you can rest assured he’ll go back to Arians’ basics once that time is up. Once you’re addicted to the pass, you never get the monkey off your back.
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
Miller will get under 75
Wallace’s rec will go up, Ward recs will stay the same. Mendenhall recs will go up as well. If we are going to a run team first i’m guessing Miller will be staying more to block. I think he will be a big red zone target until we can prove to punch in a score with our backfield.
on a side note wasnt Spaeth TD catch vs the Bears on week 2?
I love Vegas
Franco made that play because he never quit on the play. He kept running, he kept hustling. Good things happen to people who hustle."
I said under but not by much
maybe 65-70
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"It is better to offer no excuse than a bad one." George Washington
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
Over
Dude catches everything thrown his way. BL or DD will rely on that. Two QB’s with short Steeler resumes will fall back on the shorter, surer passes. It would probably be around the time Ben comes back that they’d be more comfortable in spreading the field.
Just MHO…as always.
"Who is Joe Namath? This is a guy who, if he played in the league today, I'd probably just go hit him late and see what he did, just for the hell of it. Joe Namath can go to hell; he can kiss my ass." - Greg Lloyd, after NBC commentator Joe Namath accused Lloyd of playing dirty.
How can your opinion be humble
if you are the one calling it humble? Sorta contradictory, no? If you ask me, which you didn’t, it should be MWO or IMWO .. .. .. eeshoo
There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark
by chewiesteeler on Jun 10, 2010 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions
how about IMFO
"Who is Joe Namath? This is a guy who, if he played in the league today, I'd probably just go hit him late and see what he did, just for the hell of it. Joe Namath can go to hell; he can kiss my ass." - Greg Lloyd, after NBC commentator Joe Namath accused Lloyd of playing dirty.
by count'em_six on Jun 10, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I like that one
There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark
by chewiesteeler on Jun 10, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
lol
thats awesome
or IMNSHO
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Jun 10, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions
In My Notoriously Shitty Opinion?
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
crap, forgot the honest
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions
lol
in my not so humble opinion
Steelers football is 60 mins.
by tannofsteel84 on Jun 10, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions
IMNSHO
In My Notoriously Shit-Headded Opinion.
I think that’s what Johnny was going for.
"Cam, we're not going to have any issues because we're going to be winning."
--Joe Flacco
"Just win baby. Yeah, I stole that."
--Jon Gruden
Or
In My Near Sighted Hollow Opinion
"Who is Joe Namath? This is a guy who, if he played in the league today, I'd probably just go hit him late and see what he did, just for the hell of it. Joe Namath can go to hell; he can kiss my ass." - Greg Lloyd, after NBC commentator Joe Namath accused Lloyd of playing dirty.
by count'em_six on Jun 11, 2010 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I like that better
“In My Wonderful Opinion”
"Who is Joe Namath? This is a guy who, if he played in the league today, I'd probably just go hit him late and see what he did, just for the hell of it. Joe Namath can go to hell; he can kiss my ass." - Greg Lloyd, after NBC commentator Joe Namath accused Lloyd of playing dirty.
once again I don't know how to reply
"Who is Joe Namath? This is a guy who, if he played in the league today, I'd probably just go hit him late and see what he did, just for the hell of it. Joe Namath can go to hell; he can kiss my ass." - Greg Lloyd, after NBC commentator Joe Namath accused Lloyd of playing dirty.
by count'em_six on Jun 10, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Just go into “Install/Uninstall Programs” in your Control Panels and uninstall the internetz. That should help with the reply problem.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Jun 10, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
but denz i's wudn't be able ta be on dis her websyte
"Who is Joe Namath? This is a guy who, if he played in the league today, I'd probably just go hit him late and see what he did, just for the hell of it. Joe Namath can go to hell; he can kiss my ass." - Greg Lloyd, after NBC commentator Joe Namath accused Lloyd of playing dirty.
by count'em_six on Jun 10, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
+1
There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark
by chewiesteeler on Jun 10, 2010 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes, yes it did
I can’t believe it wasn’t closer to 8-1 the way Chicago seemed to be skating circles around the Flyers. They were gassed. What a run though.
There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark
by chewiesteeler on Jun 11, 2010 6:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Not meaning to hi-jack the thread here,
but as impressed with Ville Leino and Cladue Giroux (forgive my spelling) as I was, I’m really disappointed in just how little an impact Jeff Carter had.
What a run is right, and it shows that they do have the team we all thought they did, they just needed some motivation.
Carter and Gagne
both sorta faded in this series. Don’t forget though, each had some type of foot/toe surgery immediately following the Jersey series and came back early to try and help the team. I think it finally caught up to them.
There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark
by chewiesteeler on Jun 11, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
I thought Gagne showed more though.
He made a bigger impact in the Boston series and in the Finals I still thought he was at least out there. Carter just didn’t seem to be there.
You’re right, I give them both credit for getting back in time to play at all. I guess I’m thinking Carter should have sat back once he saw he wasn’t making an impact. Not that Carcillo is the best player mind you, but at least he brought some kind of energy to the team when he was out there. A dumb penalty or two for sure, but you KNEW he was on the ice. Carter, not so much.
Live and learn, right? DYMS must not be too happy that we’re having these Flyers chats while his beloved Penguins are on already on the gold course, eh?
I'd say.....
McHugh supplants either Spaeth or Johnson. Early reports say that he’s caught everything,and,like Johnson,he’s a physical blocker. Unlike Johnson(at least so far),he can also play FB competently. You also have to admire his moxie battling back from last year’s injury like he apparently has….

by 

















