Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

Pittsburgh Steelers Training Camp Primer: The Quarterbacks

PITTSBURGH - APRIL 19:  Dennis Dixon #2 of the Pittsburgh Steelers practices on April 19, 2010 at the Pittsburgh Steelers South Side training facility in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

With training camp less than two months away, let's start breaking down each and every positional battle that will take sort itself out when the Pittsburgh Steelers open their 2010 training camp in Latrobe, Pennsylvania.

Let's begin with the most scrutinized and celebrated position in all of sports - the quarterback.

 

Overview:

In the days leading up to the 2010 NFL Draft, the rumor mill was in full swing about the possibility of the Pittsburgh Steelers trading their two-time Super Bowl winning quarterback, Ben Roethlisberger. The Steelers may have entertained the idea of doing so, but ultimately before the draft had officially commenced, the Rooney family had issued a statement saying that the Steelers had no intention of trading Big Ben and would be giving him one final opportunity to get his act together off the field.

Since the announcement of his six game suspension, which he stated he would not challenge, Big Ben has done and said all the right things. Pending no future shenanigans as well as exemplary adherence to the rehabilitation process laid out by the NFL, Roethlisberger's suspension could be reduced to four games. Returning Big Ben to the fold after four games rather than six is preferable for obvious reasons, but one worth noting is that Pittsburgh's BYE week happens to come in Week 5. That means Roethlisberger could conceivably return in Week 6 having had two weeks to work with his offensive teammates. When he finally does return, be it after four or six games, he'll face intense scrutiny from the league office, not to mention unforgiving loud-mouthed fans in opposing stadiums.

While Ben sits to start the year, the Steelers will turn to either Dennis Dixon or Byron Leftwich (or both) to lead the offense.

Star-divide

The Contenders

How Leftwich Wins The Job

Leftwich holds several key advantages over Dixon. The most important of course is his experience. Lefwich, despite not having played much the past three seasons, has seen just about everything there is to see in the NFL. Okay, that may be overstating it a little bit. But Leftwich has started 49 NFL games compared to Dixon's one. He's led a team to the playoffs, seen countless blitz and coverage packages, and experienced the highs and the lows of life as a veteran NFL quarterback.

Simple logic would suggest that Lefwich wins the opening day duties as a result of his superior experience. That's assuming of course that he proves himself capable of making all the requisite throws and reads during camp and the preseason. Leftwich has never been lacking in arm strength. He throws an impressively hard ball when he has time to set his feet, wind up and step into a throw. The concern with Leftwich has always been his lack of mobility, and consequently being exposed to big hits and subsequent injuries. Leftwich has never started more than 14 games in a regular season (2004).

How Dixon Wins The Job

Dixon's best chance at securing the Week 1 starting job is during the preseason. It will be hard for him to distance himself from Leftiwch during training camp. At least for the most part. Quarterbacks aren't exposed to legit pressure during camp for understandable reasons. In my mind, that means Lefty just needs to demonstrate a comprehensive command of Bruce Arians' offense - which he'll do having been exposed to it two years ago - and exhibit some arm strength and throwing acumen.

When the Steelers face real competition, or at least as real as preseason action gets, Dixon may have a chance to prove he has more upside than Leftwich and can be trusted to lead the Steelers' offense for the first month of the season. The second and third preseason games are always the most intense, so I really don't see the upside in Mike Tomlin naming a starter before then.

Also In The Mix

I suppose I should mention that Charlie Batch was re-signed for what would be his fitth season in the Black & Gold if he were to break camp. Barring multiple injuries in training camp, the preseason or early in the regular season before Big Ben returns, Batch will not see the field during the 2010 regular season. As Steeler Nation knows well, Batch's value lies in his ability to mentor and teach, not produce at 35 years of age.

My Take

I personally think - or perhaps it's more like I hope - that Dixon wins the job when it's all said and done. I simply think he'll establish himself as the better of the two quarterbacks before early September. That's no knock on Leftwich really. By all accounts, he's looked in shape and fairly sharp thus far this spring. Dixon however provides much more upside and valuable versatility. If the Steelers are in fact serious about re-establishing their identity as a running football team, they'd be better off having Dixon in the backfield with Rashard Mendenhall. If nothing else, the occasional misdirection keep by Dixon would force linebackers to stay home on him for a crucial split second. Any advantage you can get in a league with such ridiculous and viscous athletes on defense is huge and must be taken advantage of.

Perhaps more importantly, and I believe Dale Lolley mentioned this in a somewhat recent post on his blog NFL From The Sidelines - Byron Leftwich has proven he's capable of stepping up in a pinch, with minimal or even no preparation. He did so against the Washington Redskins in the middle of the '08 season when Big Ben was sidelined for the second half with a shoulder injury. Big Ben had looked abysmal all half, and Leftwich immediately sparked the Steelers offense. He connected on a gorgeous 50 yard bomb to Nate Washington on his first throw of the night and ultimately led the Steelers past the 'Skins for a much needed November road win. 

Bottom line is Lefwich can easily be inserted in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 if Dixon were to struggle. He's proven that he can perform without needing a full week of practice with the first unit, as well as manage whatever psychological issues that accompany perceiving oneself as a starter or a reserve. Dixon meanwhile may benefit from knowing that he will be the starter and the extra practice sessions leading up the gameday that go along with it.

I say let Dixon start the home opener against the Atlanta Falcons. I think the following week's game - the first road game of the year against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers - determines who starts Weeks 3 and 4. Regardless of what happens in Week 1, judge Dixon on what happens in Week 2 on the road. If he wins, let him start at Tennessee the following week. If he struggles in defeat in Week 2, insert Leftwich in Week 3. We know he's plenty capable of delivering on short notice.

Comment 41 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Blitz, You make a good case for.....

Dixon to start this season under center and I share your opinion and hope of having Dixon start.

However, I just feel that the Steelers/Tomlin will go conserative here and start Byron given all the turmoil and turbulence of this off season. I think they go with the safe bet here. It’s unfortunate because Dixon will be on the sidelines and I see all this talent of his just stagnating.

Looking at both of thier personal stats, I forgot how big Leftwich is. 2 inches taller a a whopping 55lbs heavier than Dixon! Byron is a big guy.

I think the best we can hope for is to see Bruce A put in multiple offensive packages where Dixon comes in on a situational basis. Like you though, I still want him to start.

by ToonaSteel on Jun 8, 2010 3:43 AM EDT reply actions  

I've mentioned wanting to go with Dixon and see what he can accomplish

But given that Tomlin doesn’t want a QB competition going into the preseason, I’m feeling more and more that he’ll have to do something amazing to unseat Leftwich, who’s reportedly been the more consistent player in OTAs.

FYI, the Tennessee game is Week 2.

by TheSpatulaMessiah on Jun 8, 2010 7:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Offense

  Tomlin said a while back that Leftwich’s style would create less disruption in the offensive switching between QBs when Ben comes back. I take that as a large hint that some people on the coaching staff don’t want to change the offense to fit Dixon’s talents.

The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.

by steeler junky on Jun 8, 2010 7:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Great write up as usual

I would love to see what Dixon has to offer as a starter, not to replace BB, but to see if he can produce in case BB does get injured. I think the staff would want to see this also since this is his contract, IIRC. One thing that concerns me is Goodell. It is apparent he is using this to set an example, how far is he going to go with his example. If BB does what he is supposed to, will it truly be good enough to get his suspension reduced? We can all hope, and, I guess, time will tell. Hopefully, whoever starts for us plays well enough that if it is a 6 game suspension, we can still be in the playoff hunt.

Things can always be worse....

by ncmt40 on Jun 8, 2010 9:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Hoping for creativity on offense, no matter who starts

I tend to agree with those that think the conservative approach, and thus Leftwich, will win out in the end, not that I agree with it. Whether or not Dixon starts, I’m hoping to see some offensive plays or series of plays tailored to his strengths: bootlegs, quarterback draws, a few reverses, maybe a flea flicker, maybe the option. So, even if Leftwich starts, I’m hoping they use Dixon too. But it’s a waste to ask him only to stand in the pocket the way Leftwich would. With Randel El in the game along with DD, the defense would have to worry about TWO guys who can throw the ball or run with it. Not sure if BA is capable of exploiting that potential, but if Whiz or Mularkey were still here, they’d be salivating.

by MelBlunt on Jun 8, 2010 9:15 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

Things can always be worse....

by ncmt40 on Jun 8, 2010 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ward can throw as well

So technically you’d have 3 guys who can throw, but I don’t think BA’s brain is creative enough to handle any of that.

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"

by John Stephens on Jun 8, 2010 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually...

Heath played QB in high school, let’s write that one off just yet…

May he who has never had drunken sex cast the first shot glass!

by Steelfrog on Jun 8, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

*let’ NOT

May he who has never had drunken sex cast the first shot glass!

by Steelfrog on Jun 8, 2010 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

battle played QB his first two years at Notre Dame also

"all my bitches, take some shots!"

by dankdiggety on Jun 8, 2010 8:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't forget Randle El

I love being the most-hated guy here. I love beating them while [their fans] are flicking me off. --Hines Ward

by samliam on Jun 14, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

ME Hope Too

  I would love to see Dixon get some playing time. I am looking forward to seeing how he does in preseason. I jsut get the impression that from what all I have read. That Arians is unchangeable. I believe Arians has a good base offense. He just doesn’t believe in improving on it!

The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.

by steeler junky on Jun 8, 2010 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Leftwich.

Leftwich has the unique position of not creating or extending plays with his feet. I think of this as a plus for him starting the first four games.

Why you ask? Because we want a balanced offense that relies on the running game and the QB not getting crushed. With Leftwich BA will either have to run the ball or have pass plays that get rid of the ball quickly. If he can’t do that he will look bad and (hopefully) be gone. If he can then our team will be better for it.

Dixon gives us that broken play threat that would again let BA off the hook and let him dial up all his pass plays with that extra threat of Dixon running helping his case.

Seriously, 5 wide on 3rd and short worked when Kordell was our QB. You just couldn’t stop everything. Dixon could be that guy, I don’t want that guy. I want the pocket QB that needs protected forcing BA to run an intelligent and balanced offense. Is Leftwich the future at QB? Definitely not; but he could be the right man to force Arians to get this offense straightened out.

Yeah I know Rooney said run the ball, but BA will only run the ball as much as it makes sense to him. He isn’t going to become a robot and call the plays the owner wants. He’ll look to appear more balanced, but his offense won’t change unless he thinks it needs to.

by Phantaskippy on Jun 8, 2010 10:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Well reasoned

but doesn’t that beg the question of whether or not we have the bodies to line up in an I-formation and simply knock the opposing D out of the way? Perhaps Kemo and Colon can do that, but I just don’t Starks, Hartwig, or even Pouncey driving some of the massive DT/NT we see in the AFC North offf the ball. Trust me, I wish we could do that. I am not a fan of BA, but maybe he doubts the ability of the O-line to play that style of football, so he goes with 5 WR in 3rd and short. Maybe we need Dixon as the additional threat? Time will tell.

Mr. Blitz: Thank you for the great, thought-provoking post.

I'm your huckleberry

by CLK47 on Jun 8, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lacking

  A running game isn’t all brute force,but it certainly helps. zone blocking, misdirection and trap blocking are important also. But must start out with a well designed blocking scheme.Each defensive line has a weakness. It is the OCs job to find and exploit it. Two or three bread an butter run plays that work well are all that is needed to get a defense to over react then pop them with something else. If the steelers offense continues to be predictable in fourth quarters it will be the same as 2009.

The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.

by steeler junky on Jun 8, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

By making him getting rid of the ball quickly...

you remove one of his main advantages over Dixon: the deep ball almost always requires an extended pass blocking scheme. So if we’re to clip Byron’s wings, might as well do it with the kid with upside.

"I am a sinner who does not expect forgiveness, but [Thank God] I am not a government official" Francis Wolcott in "Deadwood", Season 2

by Flying Polamalus on Jun 8, 2010 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think Wallace needs much time to get deep. They underthrow him already, and if Sylvester is as fast as he times, then getting rid of the ball early shouldn’t be a problem. My big point though is how often our plays just don’t get going until the play has been busted. Ben had time last year, he just took more than he needed and bailed out covered plays quite often.

If we can’t rely on that we’ll need to be smarter in our playcalling.

by Phantaskippy on Jun 8, 2010 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Skippy..

I didnt really understand what you were saying about Sylvester and how he influences the throwing time. Other then that we are in agreement. Leftwich will start and my brain is telling me thats a good thing, but my heart wants dixon cause i think he can be really good if given a chance. Maybe im just tired of tomlin taking the conservative approach almost every time.

by TrueSteelerForLife on Jun 9, 2010 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sanders is the name I meant to type. He’s a burner too. A little tired when I posted that.

by Phantaskippy on Jun 9, 2010 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve heard both coaches and players state that the running game usually opens up the second half of the season. O -linemen get into a groove, and don’t necessarily rely on brute strength to open holes. I don’t expect a massive change in the running game. I think with Mendy and Dwyer will definitely see the ball more, but the passing attack will still confound some die hard Steeler fans who hate BA in the first 4 games. Come to think of it, provided the new o-line coach does his thing and the o line starts to gel, game 6 could be a gold mine for the offense. Ben back, running game working better. Too many surprises and unknowns to plan for as an opposing d. I do however think that Ben will be timid. Some of his talent is wrapped up in arrogance.

Having said that, Lefty gets the call because of experience, as you state blitz, but I also think BA isn’t stupid or stubborn enough to miss the opportunity to use Dix as another running threat when needed. The Baltimore game last year was indicative of his abilities. First half – great. Second -not so great because of adjustments on the raven d. Dix couldn’t react to the new schemes, and resulted in an interception that lost the game. Nothing against Dixon, but he still needs trail dust.

I guess I see Lefty and Dix battling it out for #2 long term. Not the 2010 season but beyond. But unless Dix gets some snaps during the regular season, it’d be a guessing game.

by IronJake on Jun 8, 2010 11:59 AM EDT reply actions  

Funny, the eye of the beholder...

I’m thinking that Dixon is exactly what we need right now. Skippy makes some great points, especially the balanced O comments, but I’m still going with Dixon.

Looking at the schedule, 2.5 of the first 4 are against strong pass-rush teams (Falcons get .5 at the moment), and unless our line is going to give all day to Lefty to throw, he’s going to feel the pressure. To me, that’s where we need Dixon to use his mobility to his advantage. I thought he played great against the Ravens and their pressure packages – he gets the nod.

I would love to see a smooth transition from QB to QB when Ben comes back….I’d prefer to have the W’s and think Dixon gives us the better chance when I look at the schedule…

by dawgs144 on Jun 8, 2010 3:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

I also want to add that it wouldn’t surprise me to see if, presuming Dixon does start, that he plays with a chip on his shoulder. He did play well against the Ravens but he was short of a W and I want him to feel little more hungry. That’s where I think Lefty lacks. He simply doesn’t need to prove himself in a way that Dixon does. Right now I think Dixon gets the starting job cause he’s a hungry man. I mean look at him, he needs to gain some more weight anyway.

This is Pittsburgh Steeler Troy Polamalu getting knocked around by the Pacific Ocean in Hawaii yesterday...
Minutes later, Troy caught the ocean going over the middle and smacked it right in the mouth. The ocean fumbled, Troy recovered and ran it into the endzone. The ocean never messed with Troy again.

by paulamalu on Jun 9, 2010 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is anyone else hesitant about Leftwich starting given our problems on the offensive line with protecting the quarterback? I think Dixon would be the best fit in our scenario.

Pittsburgh sports all the way

by GoPens! on Jun 8, 2010 3:43 PM EDT reply actions  

two reasons I'm not that worried

our O-line isn’t all that bad. Take out Ben’s holding onto the ball too long and you have a significantly less amount of sacks. Byron knows to get rid of the ball quickly, his prolonged release is the problem there. But still, he knows to get rid of the ball quickly and sure as hell isn’t going to be moving around in the pocket, assuring the offensive lineman of his location.

Also, if pressure does get to him I can see Lefty taking the sack rather than throwing a rushed pass. Dixon on the other hand may let the pressure force him into bad throws.

still though, like most people, I’d like to see Dixon start. But I wouldn’t be upset with Lefty getting the node either. Still hoping for a two QB system…

by shleeve on Jun 8, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

The OL isn’t a problem.

A two QB system….you mean run DD in for certain sets? How about Lefty first half, DD second when the D is getting tired, any halftime adjustments would be moot….just a thought, not a well worked out one….

by Twell on Jun 8, 2010 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d like to see Dixon start at QB as well, but a lot of the stats point to our O-line as a major weakness on the team. It’s tough to look at sacks because there’s no measurement that attempts to separate the responsibility between the OL and the QB. Moreover, there’s no stat that I know of that attempts to quantify how many sacks a QB prevented all on his own. Ben’s last-minute scrambling comes to mind.

That being said, they still paint a pretty grim picture for the O-line. They were 2nd in the league in sacks allowed (50) and tied for 16th in QB hits allowed (78). Even if we say Ben was responsible for 35% of the sacks, and don’t take into account how many sacks he individually prevented, the o-line would have still given up 33 sacks, which is right in line with the middle of the league. Hardly spectacular by any measurement.

As far as the running game is concerned, the O-line also had a pretty bad year last year. They were 17th in yards per rush (4.2), 19th in total rushing yards (1,793), and tied for 20th in rushing TD’s (10). What’s worse is that 8 of the 16 regular season games the Steelers played were against teams who finished in the bottom third of rushing defense in the league. That we couldn’t rack up more yards given this schedule has to fall at least in part on the O-line.

Pittsburgh sports all the way

by GoPens! on Jun 8, 2010 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Leftwich might actually have a bigger double chin than Ben does.

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 8, 2010 3:58 PM EDT reply actions  

At least he doesn't resemble Jabba the Hutt

There is no dark side of the moon really .. .. .. matter of fact it's all dark

by chewiesteeler on Jun 8, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like "Sexy" Rexy? LOL!

"Hey baby, want some Adam West penis?"
- Adam West

by Steel Spike on Jun 9, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

You see him throw that pitch last night? Man, I thought he was supposed to be losing weight. He looks bigger!

You have to hate losing more than you love winning.

by Mr MaLoR on Jun 9, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great Post

I remember when i wrote on the same subject a short while ago, I was hopeful for Dixon, and I personally still think we would benefit more from having him start, in terms of his future

Although I’m still struggling to see a possibility that he will start, sure it may make sense to us, but from all accounts that I have heard, Byron is the guy

I figure Mendy will be facing a lot of 8 man fronts due to the “decline” our passing game is expecting to face.

Best way to counter that in my opinion. Letfys rocket arm coupled with Mike Wallace’s blazing speed. I dont think that chemistry will be there with Dixon at QB

Without me, youre only you

by GotWoodley? on Jun 8, 2010 5:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Depends more on wallace

I think Dixon can get him the ball. Its going to be real revealing to see how Wallace handles this year. He needs to be big,

Lefty’s arm is so nuclear he could still overthrow him I bet.

by Mechem on Jun 9, 2010 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I bet he could throw it over Mt. Washington

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Jun 10, 2010 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

DD

He’s had time to learn the playbook, and I really think he should be ready by week 1. I don’t see any indication he’d hold on to the ball for a long time, unlike Ben. At least against the Ravens, he made quick decisions, and running seemed to be on his mind only when this was the best option.
Lefty is a solid backup, strong arm, but he has bounced around the league for a reason.

by tkired on Jun 9, 2010 2:26 AM EDT reply actions  

My thoughtages

I agree 100% on your analysis..

Something was rather telling I thought when Tomlin mentioned practice reps.

I remember a bit ago prior to Ben’s re-activation, somebody asked what happens to the reps when Ben returns. And of course Tomlin said Ben goes back with the team. But he also mentioned the remaining split of reps would be at the expense of Leftwich and probably divied to Dixon. Which means he still wants Dixon to get a lot of reps.

I think honestly at the end of training camp Dixon could be given the keys to the car. I think for OTAs its not as important yet. Were not at the crucial pads-on stage yet. Lets wait it out.

But yes Dixon needs to be played and tested otherwise he is just bench-rot Brian St. Pierre style.

by Mechem on Jun 9, 2010 11:53 PM EDT reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
A Letter to Hines Ward
Franco72_small
The Last Sunday
Small
Joe Greene on Steelers Offense Under BA
Small
Homer reps BTSC and Steeler Nation on Washington Post Front Page
Small
Your Super Bowl Hate Guide

Recent FanPosts

Small
My Top 14 Steelers FA Targets
178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small
Bowling for Super Bowl
Small
6 Round NFL Mock Draft
Small
My Top 11 3rd Round Prospects
Small
My Top 11 2nd Round Prospects
Small
Who are your Top 5 Steelers of all time?
Steel-ball-logo-poster_small
Knowing Your Guards: A look at the 2012 Prospects (Updated 2/11/12)
Rodthreerivers_small
Report: Steelers Don't Want Ward
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2008 Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Stogs_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo