Pittsburgh Steelers vs. Denver Broncos - Three Questions Prior To Pittsburgh's Third Preseason Game
On the eve of the Pittsburgh Steelers third preseason game against the Denver Broncos, here's a short Q&A between myself and John Bena, the accomplished Broncos blogger for SB Nation at Mile High Report. I sent three his way as well, and will be happy to share them with you if we get them back in time for tomorrow's tilt.
1. We all know Big Ben will be gone for at least 4 weeks to start the season. Byron Leftwich seems to be the guy right now, but Dennis Dixon has been impressive. He’ll reportedly get some reps with the first team against the Broncos. Who is your preference to get the Steelers through the season’s first month, and what is the expectation?
BTSC: My preference has been that Dennis Dixon gets the nod. I've been clamoring for that on Behind the Steel Curtain for quite some time. There's two main reasons. One, I think Dixon has more upside thatn does Leftwich at this stage in their respective careers. Leftwich is no slouch, don't get me wrong. But at 30 years of age, he's pretty much shown what he's capable of and what his limitations are. Dixon? It's not so clear what his ceiling is. And from the looks of it this preseason, he's far enough along with his development that it's safe to say that he wouldn't be a total disaster. Secondly, the time is now to see what the Steelers have in Dixon. If not now, never, as Dixon is entering the final year of his contract. We've seen what teams are willing to give up possible solutions at quarterback - just look at the Seattle Seahawks and how they traded for Charlie Whitehurst. Of course, there's the chance that Ben Roethlisberger gets injured or that he even slips up and finds himself in trouble off the field. But if nothing else, the Steelers may be able to get some compensation next offseason when Dixon hits the open market were he to get a chance to sign early this season.
As for expectations, I think most Steelers fans are looking at 3-1, and no worse than 2-2 during the first four games of the year. The division opener against Baltimore in Week 4 will obviously be tough.
2. The Steelers appear on the verge of starting a rookie lineman for the first time in 5 years. How good has Maurkice Pouncey been and are you confident he can handle the job once the season starts?
BTSC: Pouncey has looked oustanding thus far through training camp and the first two games of the preseason. His performance against Jamal Williams on Sunday should go a long ways towards determining if he winds up as the team's starting center. If not, he'll likely still be a starter at right guard.
3. We all know how much Troy Polamalu means to the Steelers’ success. Give us another guy that the Steelers just can’t afford to lose this season that many people don’t think about.
BTSC: There's a number of indispensable stars on the Steelers roster. Pittsburgh has struggled when Aaron Smith (defensive end) has gone down in 2007 and 2009. The Steelers might also be in a bind if Ike Taylor (cornerback) were lost. Same with Hines Ward and Heath Miller. But really, I think Polamalu belongs in a class of his own in terms of bringing something truly unique to the table. There's really nobody like him in the league.
27 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good times Mike
Were I to have answered #3, I would have said James Harrison as one of the stars we really couldn’t afford to lose. Our DB’s (aside from His Royal Hairiness) are almost good enough to keep coverage until Deebo or The Woodpile can get to the QB. Deebo goes down, we only have Woodley, and a rookie (shudder) to get in the passers face. Our defense relies HEAVILY on our pass-rush. No pass-rush, and our DB’s can’t keep containment, and we get destroyed through the air.
I love the smell of burnt O-line in the morning!
-Me, ripping off Robert Duvall in Apocalypse Now
good call
I didn’t love that question just because I think so many players are ‘irreplacable’ but at the same time it’s never fun to say that the team shouldn’t be able to survive the loss of anybody but their star qb.
Anyway, agreed about Deebo. We definitely need him.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Aug 29, 2010 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree about the crappiness of the question
I did have to think about it, but not very hard.
I think Max Starks would be an option as well, simply because we don’t have ANYONE to take his slot and perform to his level.
Stonehands Ike is our best corner, but I think we would be okay without him. None of our corners are superstars, but with our pass-rush, they don’t need to be. That’s why I picked Deebo.
Hmm, not sure why I felt the need to explain it all again…Guess I’m pretty tired…LOL
I love the smell of burnt O-line in the morning!
-Me, ripping off Robert Duvall in Apocalypse Now
no doubt losing deebo would hurt
but if it did happen i think timmons would slide over. to me if we lost big snack we’d be in trouble.
I hate Hines Ward but I sure wish he was on my team.- ex Ravens head coach Brian Billick
by MAN_OF_STEEL_86 on Aug 29, 2010 1:11 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't think Timmons has what it takes to be a 3-4 OLB
He’s (going to be) great where he is, but all he’s done with us is ILB. If he was a good outside rusher, wouldn’t he have been starting on the outside?
There’s no substitute for a good old fashioned bull-rush from an OLB. Timmons might have a spin move, but he’s not fast enough to recover from the spin and get to the passer.
Yes, we might be fine with Timmons on the outside, but I doubt it.
I love the smell of burnt O-line in the morning!
-Me, ripping off Robert Duvall in Apocalypse Now
i think timmons has what it takes to play on the outside just not enough to put woodley or harrison on the bench. i dont think he has the brute strength for bull rushing but i definitely think he has elite speed for a linebacker
I hate Hines Ward but I sure wish he was on my team.- ex Ravens head coach Brian Billick
by MAN_OF_STEEL_86 on Aug 29, 2010 1:39 AM EDT up reply actions
He's fast, but not very quick
Open field speed is not the same as quickness. A quick OLB can do spin moves, and juke a TE out of his cleats. With a fast one, it takes a long time to get all the way around a TE or a Tackle to get back to the passer.
I love the smell of burnt O-line in the morning!
-Me, ripping off Robert Duvall in Apocalypse Now
Timmons at 3-4 OLB would play more like Emmons IMO, he wouldn’t be a big time blitzer he’d do more coverage and ILB would blitz more, LeBeau would have no trouble making the adjustment, it just wouldn’t be as good as what we have healthy.
by Phantaskippy on Aug 29, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions
i heart big snack so much
Love he’s with the team a few more years. Hall of Fame worthy imo.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Aug 29, 2010 2:13 AM EDT up reply actions
agree and disagree
We all know how good Deebo is, but we are pretty stacked at the LB position (in theory). Its fair to say he us irreplaceable, but at the same time we should, I repeat, should have depth at that position.
They finally drafted an heir apparent for Deebo, but...
Deebo goes down, we only have Woodley, and a rookie (shudder) to get in the passers face
That was my point.
I love the smell of burnt O-line in the morning!
-Me, ripping off Robert Duvall in Apocalypse Now
Decisions, Decisions
I’m leaning toward DD to start. It’s nice that Lefty is there in case he’s needed, but I was shocked at how poised DD became in 1 year. (The young man has a set of wheels, too!)
Go Pounce! I’m pretty confident he’ll do well~ but I’m worried more about the RG position right now. Maybe he “should” go to the RG since Hartwig isn’t a slouch at Center?
Jeff Freakin’ Reed. We cannot afford to lose him. He has been Mr. Clutch & Consistency. There. I said it.
When the tailgate drops, the BS stops. Shut up and play!
hehe
Good point actually. I wouldn’t want to break in a new kicker at Heinz this year. I think we’re going to be a VERY tough team, but we likely won’t blow tons of opponents out. Not many teams do in the NFL. That means needing a good FG kicker. Baltimore left a few wins on the table last year because they thought they could just willy nilly move on from a reliable kicker.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Aug 29, 2010 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Speaking of kickers...
That kid from Pitt should be entering the draft for 2011, and he has a crazy made% at Hines Field…Something like 70%-ish from 40+ yards I think…
I love the smell of burnt O-line in the morning!
-Me, ripping off Robert Duvall in Apocalypse Now
drop
reed after this year then lol
Steelers football is supposed to be 60 mins, recently it's been 45. The additional 15 are currently under construction.
by tannofsteel84 on Aug 29, 2010 4:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Kind of the idea...LOL
If that kid can generate stops on runbacks, then Reed becomes expendable.
I love the smell of burnt O-line in the morning!
-Me, ripping off Robert Duvall in Apocalypse Now
by Steel Spike on Aug 30, 2010 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions
Almost makes ya nauseous
thinking about which starter could be replaced. Last year without Troy served as a reminder just how much of an impact player he really is. (Skill AND leadership)
I agree, Michael. Blow-outs aren’t something we see much of and I’m ok with that! I would like a few less nail-biters, though. 60 minutes of A-game football.
When the tailgate drops, the BS stops. Shut up and play!
bad question
I would have to say Ward would be the worst one to lose, perhaps mendy. It’s tough to choose. Ward goes down what do we have? A bunch of young unprovens and ARE. That would be horrible.
yeah Ward is still the man on our depth chart
Though I have to say I’m a tad bit concerned with the way he’s looked so far this preseason. Has looked a step slow. Hopefully he’s just saving it for the real deal.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Aug 29, 2010 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions
He'll be fine
It he’s not catching passes, he’s throwing up blocks for the others.
Chris Andersen could be in a porno with his 'stache. Too bad he still wouldn't know how to box out.
Honesty may be the best policy, but it's important to remember that apparently, by elimination, dishonesty is the second-best policy.
Quitter's Proud United Member #11
Ward
I don’t like to think about , because I love to see his smiling face on the field.. But it is getting to the point in Ward’s carreer where every year could be his last. So enjoy watching Ward play while you can.
The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.
by steeler junky on Aug 29, 2010 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
And what’s worrisome is that Dale Lolley reported that Hines hasn’t just looked bad in games, but looks slower in practice and training camp.
Here’s to hoping Hines hears the doubters (me included) and comes out on fire to prove them/us wrong. It’s happened before.
by Chicago Steeler on Aug 29, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
No dis-respect meant
With no dis-respect to any of our established veterans. On Offense I will have to say we can’t afford to loose WR Wallace at anytime this year. We have a good receiveing corp I believe. But Wallace is going to be the main stretch the field and take the cover off the top man in the early part of the season.
On defense it any core guy has a good argument in his favor.
The more I learn -The less I think I know! Just enjoy reading and sharing.
+1
I think I might say Wallace also. his ability to stretch the field is going to force safety help over the top making everyone else look better. With him out we have to hope a rookie can step in and do what he’s done.
by Chicago Steeler on Aug 29, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Pouncey.
He’s not a rookie now. IF he’s starting on a team that has Super Bowl aspirations you can’t judge him as a rookie.
Watching today he has to be considered with absolutely no slack for his experience, he needs to be the best right now (he is).
I want to see him handle Williams like I would want any good center to do it. He will have to.
As for RG, I don’t think he looks nearly as good at RG as he does Center, if he doesn’t start at center I expect him on the bench getting rotated in a lot.
Good answers
Regarding Dixon, though, I’m not sure that he has anywhere at all to go on this team. Even if he starts the first four games—then what? He’s not going to be happy playing second fiddle and we probably still lose him when his contract is up. Probably the best we can hope for is that Dixon will improve his value on the trade market.
That’s the benefit the Steelers had when they drafted Dixon. They already had a great starter in BB and a capable veteran back up in Batch. Take a flier in the 4th round on Dixon and develop him over a few years. If BB continues to play and grow like he was at the time they drafted Dixon, and Dixon develops, now you have someone that could potentially generate a high draft choice down the road.
If Dixon continues to play well, this couldn’t have possibly worked out any better.

by 
















