Superbowl XL refs
What the Hell is this crap? Seattle lost because they played a bad game and the Steeler Defense played great. They had plenty of chances and they blew it. Sorry yahoo, but this article sucked.
almost 2 years ago
PCISteeler
126 comments
8 recs |
Comments
This Excuse Making Is Tiring Me
I am with you PCI Steeler. It seems like Ed Leavy, along with Mike Holmgren, never failed to learn a basic lesson about officating.
One way or another, whether you get screwed by the officals or not, you still have to line up ready to play. (Click here for a more indepth discussion.)
I'm not bitter about the refs
Like I am about Jerramy Stevens, but it’s not like these refs were flawless. The Roethlisberger touchdown was bogus and you know that. Granted it would’ve been 4th and goal and you had the bus ready to run over people from a few inches out.
I guess the offensive PI was legit if not iffy, but there was a clear blown call on the “low block” after the Taylor interception.
What’s ironic about this is that you guys nearly got jobbed in the Colts game after that obvious Polomalu interception was called “incomplete” and it remains one of the worst calls I’ve ever seen.
Nick Garcia is the Brian Russell of MLS but 10 times worse.
by SSreporters on Aug 7, 2010 1:45 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
wow, you and I are basically on the same page
Also during that Indy game was a blown Pass Interference call and that total “do over” call on a Indy offside. All the calls were going against the Steelers that game, I’m thinking the Super Bowl may have been the football Gods do what they do.
It felt like you guys were going to win
Because Kimo knocked Carson Palmer out of the game when I think you guys were behind and getting outplayed. Jon Kitna wasn’t good enough to lead the comeback.
Go up 21-0 in Indy and look like you’ll get the clinching score at 21-18 before the Bettis fumble. Big Ben makes the shoestring tackle and saves the game because Vanderjagt sliced the ball like a golf drive.
The AFC Championship game instead of the Patriots you got to face Jake freaking Plummer.
Basically the best set of circumstances for the Steelers helped in the same way the Seahawks got to play both wild card teams in their two games (we still would’ve smashed the Bears though ;-)).
Nick Garcia is the Brian Russell of MLS but 10 times worse.
You have good points, but....
We weren’t behind when Palmer went down, and we weren’t getting “outplayed,” unless you want to argue that they were outplaying us by their 2nd play of their first possession of the entire game.
Kitna wasn’t chopped liver, and was way more mobile than Carson Palmer, which against our pass rush was a bonus. We just swamped them by the third quarter, they just simply had no answer.
AFCCG on the road (like all the others, funny, that’s an advantage…?) against a division winning 13-3 team with a QB that lit it up that season. He melted against the Steelers. Funny, same thing happened to another QB by the name of Peyton “I’m going to wave my arms to no avail and make pissy looks back at the field while I walk back to the bench and slam my helmet on the ground when I get to the sideline after every possession” Manning. Plummer was having his best season of his career, and WE made him gag. Give credit where it’s due. Hell, don’t give credit, we don’t need it. We have the blasted Lombardi from ’05, which we EARNED.
So tired of even this level of revisionist history. Go back to the damn pacific northwest and drink some tainted rainwater.
“Best set of circumstances” my ass.
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. Please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com for more info. Thanks!
"The Roethlisberger touchdown was bogus and you know that. "
I don’t know that! It was a close call and they couldn’t change the call on the field. It’s not a fact that this wasn’t a touchdown no matter how much whining occurs.
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Keep crying. It is very becoming of you.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
"Successful destination is the pinnacle, make no mistake, but the fun is in the journey." - Tim Gleason
by chewiesteeler on Aug 14, 2010 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions
I really dont get all the crying
Steelers still would have won.
So Ben’s TD was inconclusive, well guess what, the ruling on the field stands and that ruling as TD if I recall correctly. And if I don’t recall correctly it would have been 4th and goal from the one inch line and we had Bettis, or Ben for that matter.
The low block on Hasslebeck was a bad call, but that was after an INT so it was our ball anyway. I don’t think that call really mattered that much.
What cost the Seahawks were dropped passes, allowing the big play, and missed field goals.
The offensive PI call was legit, Jackson pushed off, sending Chris Hope backwards, which gave Jackson an unfair shot at the ball. In my mind there was no way that wasn’t PI.
I will be okay with them publishing articles like this when they when publish articles about the even more speculative officiating in the Steelers – Colts Playoff game that year. I mean compared to that game the Super Bowl officiating was perfect.
Ben's TD was not inconclusive, it was plain as day not a touchdown
Re the INT it was still your ball but you got 15 yards extra out of it and more room to maneuver. The play before that I think we had a 1st and goal at the 1 taken away because of a very iffy holding call on Sean Locklear, but still if we go by law that’s “holding” even if it was very minor. That may be the other call Leavy was referring to.
Seattle kinda shot themselves in the foot on numerous occasions, and that’s why I’m not as bitter about it. Josh Brown missed 2 field goals, Jerramy Stevens was an idiot who ran his mouth even though he sucks, and for some reason Mike Holmgren called a pass-heavy gameplan and botched clock management.
Nick Garcia is the Brian Russell of MLS but 10 times worse.
I'm a Steeler fan in the NW...
…and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve wished the Seahawks fan I was talking to had some semblance of your perspective on this one.
I don’t think there’s anything intrinsically wrong with Leavy coming out and admitting errors in officiating. In fact, we could deal with a bit more honest accountability from refs with regards to games like this. And to be fair, the two plays I think he was referring to (the Locklear holding and Hasselbeck low block call) were pretty bad calls that shouldn’t have been made. I think some of the others (Ben’s almost-touchdown, offensive PI by Jackson) have been made into bigger deals than they would have been had the Seahawks won.
But the Seahawks didn’t lose XL because of blown calls. The Seahawks lost because they gave up the biggest of plays at the most crucial of moments. They lost because of bad clock management and missed field goals. They lost because of stalled drives, dropped passes and an interception so bad a guy with clubs for hands caught it.
I always compare this game to the Colts AFC Championship game in the playoffs two games earlier – the Steelers were handed some god-awful calls at the worst possible moments (not to mention shooting themselves in the foot with that Bettis fumble), foremost among them the Troy Polamalu’s interception being ruled dead (which, I thought, was a more obviously blown call in a more critical part of the game than anything in XL). Somehow, the Steelers dug in to hold on for the underdog win against a stacked team with the calls going their way. The Seahawks didn’t manage a similar feat in XL.
Bad calls are, and I think always will be, a part of the NFL, and I think in the long run it affects all teams evenly. For all the calls that went the Steelers way in XL, the gods decreed to look the other way in Jacksonville two years later during the collective holding that ensued on David Garrard’s victory scamper. James Harrison can be held on so many plays it becomes a running joke. So be it.
For all it’s dependence on instant replay, football is still a game officiated by human beings, and as long as human interpretation is a part of officiating, judgment calls like the Jackson PI and the Locklear holding call will continue to affect teams in game. One fanbase is going to be happy, one is going to grumble.
What drives me nuts about this Leavy statement and the ensuing coverage of it is that now we Steeler fans get to deal with a whole new wave of “Steelers are cheaters” comments, as if the Steelers were the ones calling the penalties or somehow had some manipulative influence on the referee performance in that game. We get a whole new wave of people arguing that the Seahawks most assuredly would have won the game, now armed with the “Ed Leavy said so!” argument.
I watched XL in a room full of Seahawks fans and left pretty embarrassed with the performance of my team. After a great playoffs, Ben had looked befuddled. A defense that had stifled Manning for a good part of the AFC championship game suddenly gave up big passing plays on almost every series. But the Steelers moved the ball when they had to, making big plays at critical times, and I think most guys on this site would say that’s why they won.
It’s sad, because prior to XL the Seahawks were my NFC team of choice. After that game, my being a Steeler fan became a problem for Seahawks fans (some of them my closest friends), and that persistent attitude turned me off to the team as a whole. I’m still hoping the team finds it’s way back to the Super Bowl, but now it’s so that their fans will quit whining about something that happened four years ago and quit trying to taint everything my team has accomplished in the years since.
Thanks, SS, for showing class here. I really do think the Hawks are headed in the right direction with their new coach and stacked draft class and I’m wishing you all the best in the years ahead. I wouldn’t put money on it, but I also wouldn’t be shocked to see you guys win a weakened NFC West this year.
by Thoroughbred of Sin on Aug 7, 2010 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I disagree on Ben's TD, naturally
I don’t think there is anyway you can possibly say it was clearly not a touchdown. I got the thing on DVD and its either the ball touched the goal line or was a millimeter shy. I honestly don’t think you can it was clear as day not a TD.
what about.....
The fumble that was recovered by the STeelers, but whisted dead, and unable to be reviewed? Obvious fumble in first half, that was blown. NOBODY ever remembers that one. Holding call was obvious, hand was around haggens back. that is what ref looks for. Low block was wrong, but hardly relevant. Reciever pushed off.
Holmgrem really embarrassed himself with his comments.
Seahawks did not deserve to win. Sorry.
I honestly don't remember the fumble in the first half
The big play that changed the game for me was allowing you guys to convert on 3rd and 29. I was so pissed off that the Steelers converted that and for the next 2-3 seasons 3rd and mid-range has been a problem for our defense. I believe it was Hines Ward who made the catch on that prayer of a throw.
Nick Garcia is the Brian Russell of MLS but 10 times worse.
I remember it now...
Cause I got it on DVD. Hell, even I, a Steelers fan, forgot about that fumble because all the attention has been on other calls. Scottd7 has an excellent point I totally forgot about. There was a fumble that the Steelers recovered but the refs didn’t give it to them. Can’t believe I forgot about it.
Pittsburgh won two superbowls entirely because of the referees. Everyone but Steelher fans knew it and now the proof is finally coming out.

by The Licensed Pessimist on Aug 7, 2010 6:35 PM EDT reply actions
I didn't realize it was "post funny picture" day...

:-)
by Thoroughbred of Sin on Aug 7, 2010 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I didn't realize it was "image post fail" day either...
by Thoroughbred of Sin on Aug 7, 2010 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions
If this doesn't work I give up...

by Thoroughbred of Sin on Aug 7, 2010 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Aah…the sweet smell of embarrassingly difficult victory…
by Thoroughbred of Sin on Aug 7, 2010 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions
"Steelher" is the best you could do?
Please point out how we won against Arizona on bad calls from the ref. Also, your team still played like crap in that game with or without the bad calls.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
licensed pissy-mist
is a skidmarks fan, anyway. What the hell do WE care what any of those tool bags thinks?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
Hate on haters!
20 Reasons Seattle Can’t Blame the Refs (final copy)
________________________________________
1. On plays when there wasn’t any penalties…one team made plays…one team didn’t.
2. The Refs didn’t give up the longest run in SB history………………………..Seattle did.
3. The Refs didn’t get fooled on a 43 yd trick play, Randle to Ward for a TD, Seattle did.
4. The Refs didn’t miss two field goals…………………………………………….Seattle did.
5. The Refs didn’t drop 4 very catchable balls in key situations, that was Seattle’s TE.
6. When the same Seattle TE finally caught a pass, he took 3 steps, was hit by the Safety and fumbled. But luckily for Seattle, "the Refs" ruled it incomplete.
7. The Refs didn’t carelessly let the 1st half clock tick from 48 seconds ALL THE WAY DOWN to 13 seconds before FINALLY running their next play…………….Seattle did.
8a. And now, 54 yds from a FG, 13 secs left, Seattle foolishly heaved it deep, trying for a TD rather than a shorter play & timeout to set up an easier FG try which then missed by just a few feet.
8b. 2nd half, 50 yds from a FG on 3rd down, Seattle boneheadedly does the same thing again, they fling it deep, ignoring trying to get a little closer for the FG which again missed by just a few feet.
9a. 3rd & 28, Pitt’s QB makes a play scrambling/completing a 37 yd pass to Seattle’s 2.
9b. 3rd & 18, Sea’s QB misreads the zone defense & throws an interception at Pitt’s 5.
10. Speaking of 3rd downs, Pitt was great then with plays like the 37 yarder above, QB runs when nobody was open, a nifty shovel pass, a shoestring catch by Ward, etc.
…However…Seattle was only 5 for 17 then with plays like the INT above, dropped passes, wrecklessly going deep in short yardage situations, etc.
11. Even Pitt helped Sea. when WR Ward dropped an easy TD in the endzone.
12. Even Pitt helped Sea. when CB Taylor dropped an easy INT early in the game.
13. Even Pitt helped Sea. when QB Big Ben tossed a gift-wrapped INT, with a Pittsburgh WR wide open in the endzone for a TD that would’ve put Pitt up 21 – 3…..21 – 3 !!!
14. & on this play, the Refs helped Sea too, for no flag thrown on #94 for blocking Pitt’s QB blatantly in the back, giving Sea. the ball at Pitt’s 19 instead of the Sea. 45 !
15. The mean ol’ Refs helped Sea. again with no flag thrown on Sea’s center for leveling Pitt’s DE after the play was over. Hmm, ESPN recalls these plays, somehow Sea doesn’t.
16. Who failed to step out of bounds to stop the clock late in both halves…….Seattle.
17. Who kept punting deep through the endzone giving Pitt the ball at the 20, Seattle.
18. Late in the game, needing a TD and FG, no particular order & currently in easy FG range on 4th down, who again went for the TD, losing the ball & game………..Seattle.
19. Who outrushed Seattle & contained their star RB Alexander (the NFL’s leading rusher), just enough to force several 3rd downs…Pittsburgh.
20. "Seattle…the sum total of all the above, your bad coaching decisions & clock mismanagement, breaks on big Pitt mistakes, breaks from the Refs…& your inability to make big plays adds up to…NO EXCUSES
"In Hoc Signo Vinces!" (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!) -Constantine I
by Webslasher81 on Aug 13, 2010 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
epic rec
Healing from my new tattoos
Franco made that play because he never quit on the play. He kept running, he kept hustling. Good things happen to people who hustle."
thanks brudda!
this should squash all the b/s of those SeaCrock whiners!
"In Hoc Signo Vinces!" (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!) -Constantine I
by Webslasher81 on Aug 14, 2010 1:22 AM EDT up reply actions
"this should squash all the b/s of those SeaCrock whiners!"
No, they’ll still whine like babies in the face of unassailable logic.
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
I'll just leave this here...

As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
What Seahawk fans think pt 1
The facts are these: The official who called Jackson for the penalty negating a touchdown was born and raised in Pittsburgh.
Ben Rothswhatever didn’t get in the end zone. That was obvious on the replay, but Leavy still allowed it.
Darrell Jackson caught a pass at the end of the first half where he got one foot in bounds and the other foot hit the goal line cone. If a running back touches a cone withe the ball, it’s a touchdown. In this case they ruled it an incomplete pass. The NFL changed the rule the next season to specify that one foot + cone = touchdown.
The ‘holding’ call on Sean Locklear; it’s clear on the replay that Leavy was reaching for his flag BEFORE LOCKLEAR EVEN TOUCHED THE STEALER HE SUPPOSEDLY HELD ILLEGALLY. John Madden even comments on this during the replay.
Sports Illustrated never even printed a Seahawks Super Bowl Champion edition before the game; only a Steelers one.
$400 million dollars bet on the Steelers came into Las Vegas the Friday before the game from ‘East Coast betters’ – according to an ESPN report.
And lastly, the retiring Paul Tagliabue, got to hand the Vince Lombardi trophy to his best friend in the league, Dan Rooney.
But no, the game wasn’t fixed. How could that happen? Bill Leavy just made some mistakes.
Right.
by Great Sergios Ghost on Aug 7, 2010 10:32 PM EDT reply actions
Doesn’t matter where is was born and raised, offensive pass interference is offensive pass interference. If you are trying to claim he is a closet Steeler fan then why would he open up a can of worms about blown calls now?
Its true he didn’t get in the endzone, but if the ball touched the line (which it may have, rather inconclusive) then its a TD, and that was why it was ruled so.
I’d have to watch the DVD again, I don’t recall that.
The holding call, I’ll have to watch that again too.
Wheres the proof about this sports illustrated thing?
$400 million? really, some rich person placed a bet on the favored team? no way. Well lets see there are only a billion of them on the east coast….so obviously it was some NFL official.
Touching moment, nothing more.
grow up dude.
i'd also add
if that ref had shown he was biased for the steelers, they would have never let him ref the super bowl.
the league had to change the rule about the pylon AFTER the super bowl, thus the correct call was made during the super bowl otherwise they wouldn’t have had to change the rule.
john madden doesn’t like the steelers. ever hear of the immaculate reception? he was the HC of the raiders when it happened against them. just rewatch super bowl XLIII and listen to some of the comments he makes.
most of the big calls the seahawks complain about, the officiating crew (including Levy) still stands by as being called correctly (ben’s TD, and the pass interference call)…and rightfully so.
Levy never specified which 2 calls in the 4th quarter he was referring to. granted he probably is referring to the holding call, but there was no other call or lack of call made in the 4th quarter that so serious to be “game changing.”
i guess you’d also have to add hasselbeck to the list cuz i’m not sure how you can blame the officials for the int.
by t1mmy10 on Aug 8, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
lol @ John Madden as a reference
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
way to make yourself and entire arguement look foolish
I am sitting here watching the DVD of the game and Leavy isn’t even on the screen when the holding happened. In fact he was onscreen only pre-snap. There is no way you can tell he was grabbing his flag before the hold happened. For all we know he was eating tacos back there.
I am sorry but this makes me mad, you made up a blatant lie to defend yourself, you sir are a lair. And now I don’t believe any of the other “information” you gave.
Don't feed the conspiracy theorists.
Next he’ll say Obama is the anti-christ.
A small percentage of sports “fans” think that all sports are fixed for betters, probably because they are in huge gambling debts and that’s what they’d do. There never was a shot of Leavy pulling out the flag before the play, and if there was, that would have been for offsides or a false start.
You're so full of shit you're ears drip brown.
Great conspiracy theories.
You forgot: Your sister slept with a Steeler fan 4 days before the Super Bowl, and your nephew was born 1 month premature…meaning, that if you invert the Chinese calendar for 2005, print it on clear plastic and overlay it directly on the Mayan calendar from 1205, then place it in the sun on the 45th day of the Autumnal new year and look where the shadow from the third oak tree lands in relation to the south west corner of the overlayed calendars….you’ll get five distinct letters written in Hebrew. Those letters? “I-D-I-O-T.”
I can’t wait to read the followup to your best-selling post, “What Seahawks Fans Think Pt. 2”
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. Please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com for more info. Thanks!
By request...
What Seahawks Fans Think pt. 2
Got to feel bad for Leavy, there he is in what amounts to a Pittsburgh home game, terrible towels placed on every seat, 99% of the fans and announcers openly rooting for pittsburgh to win. And then the game starts going the wrong way, Seattle’s actually the better team.. what to do. His whole career as an NFL ref hanging on how he does in this game. He must have made a call right then to himself, I can either call this thing honestly and risk my job, or I can go with the flow and do what everyone around me wants, everyone but those few freaks in gunmetal blue.
Choice was obvious. The only problem I have now is why is he saying he’s sorry? Nothing worse than a criminal trying to say he’s sorry later.
Sorry, as they say, “won’t cut it pal.”
To every Stealers fan wandering around these forums: Go home, be with your own kind, nobody in the Northwest will ever accept your fradulent titles as anything but. Keep trying though, your insistent demands are amusing, and just prove how phony deep down you know your team really is.
The NFL cheated for the Stealers in the 70s, they cheated big in super bowl XL, and they handed them yet another gifted title against Arizona. Every time some convenient story line already written — Franco Harris Immaculate Reception (and the referee back then saying how he was scared for his life if he called it for Oakland).. then the whole hoopla over Bettis in Detroit, the towels on the seats of an allegedly neutral game.. and then Az. outgaining pittsburgh in rushing and passing, but oh what a shock, 106 yards in penalties.
Face it pittsburgh you cannot win unless the referee and league cheats for you.
by Great Sergios Ghost on Aug 11, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah
like the ref cheated for us in the colts game that playoff year. oh wait…

He’s got one hand across the defenders back and the other across his chest. that’s holding.
Face it Seattle, you cannot win unless….no, you just cannot win.
Believe it or not some Seahawk Diehards don't think the fix was in
I’m not one of them.
BUT, I will stop pestering you Pittsburgers until I actually can watch the XL Bowl again.
Or as long as it remains good sport.
by Great Sergios Ghost on Aug 11, 2010 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Can you explain to us how that isn't holding?
Or do you just want to keep siphoning loads of turd through your fingers to the keyboard and onto this thread?
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 12, 2010 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions
"Or as long as it remains good sport.'
Good sport? You are embarrassing yourself! Go to hell!
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
IIRC taking your helmet off in the field of play is a penalty..
and in SB XLIII Warner took his off repeatedly, no flag…correct me if i am wrong there. On Harrison’s pick-6, Fitz is running out of bounds to catch him, with the ref right behind him, and tackles James into the endzone, Fitz never reestablished himself in the field of play before his attempted tackle, another penatly with no flag thrown. Quit griping about everything going our way in both SBs. We happened to be the better team that day when it mattered most.
Things can always be worse....
funny story
the Immaculate Reception happened in a divisional playoff game, and the Steelers didn’t even get to the super bowl that year. Gifted title where?
"But no, the game wasn’t fixed. How could that happen? Bill Leavy just made some mistakes."
I’m REALLY sick of your whining serg. I wish you would shut the hell up and stop complaining about getting whupped in the Superbowl by the 6 time champs and take it like a man.
Mike Pereira, NFL’s VP of Officiating from 2004-09: Did Leavy’s calls determine the winner of Super Bowl XL? Absolutely not! In truth, there were missed calls that went against both teams. Let’s all put aside our allegiances and go back four years and look at the game objectively. If we do, we will see that the Seahawks did not play well
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/ref-taking-super-mistakes-too-hard
Explain that crybaby.
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
"The league felt, actually, that the Super Bowl was well officiated. Now, that doesn’t mean there were no mistakes. There are always mistakes, but it was a well-officiated game."
In sports you sometimes get a good bounce and you sometimes get a bad bounce. What you are supposed to learn early on is how to lose with grace.
Haters and whiners pile up to the sky, bullshit atop bullshit, and look for any reason to peck and smear their jealous feces on the golden legacy of the perennial victor.
When You Look Upon Us
And You See This BLACK & GOLD
You Shall Fear Us
For We Will Best You,
As We Are The PITTSBURGH STEELERS
And We Are Legendary
Book of Chachi
4:12
What People Tend for Forget about Ben's Touchdown
Year’s later and people are still arguing about Ben’s touchdown.
1. NFL rules state that for a call to be overturned, there must be indisputable visual evidence. (OK, that standard is not always upheld, but that is the rule.)
2. The offical who signaled touchdown was standing on the goal line of scrimmage, and had a perfect angle, a far better angle than any of the TV cameras.
3. The TV replays made the call questionable, but there was nothing close to “indisputable visual evidence.”
The better team won the Super Bowl XL.
by Hombre de Acero on Aug 8, 2010 12:20 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Another Hawk fan (RESPECTFULLY) coming over to chime in.
My disappointment in the call was that the official changed his call while running in.
He had initially waved arms down, then as he got closer to the pile (when Ben was down and everything was scrummed and changing) he signaled up to TD. You argue that he had a better angle. I’d argue he couldn’t see clearly because he changed his call WHILE RUNNING IN. You say he “had a perfect angle” but at the point when his angle was perfect, he was not moving, and he was also signaling down and not a TD.
I’m curious what the call would have been had it SOLELY been up to the booth. As if the officials on the field said, “Uhm, we kinda missed it? I’ve no clue, you’ll have to make the call for us.” Officials are certainly fallible, but the initial guess gets an undue amount of credit as being correct in the current replay system.
But regardless, that isn’t the call that mattered to me. I was ticked and felt jobbed, but that wasn’t the call of the game by any means. Had the call been (what I believe was correct, no TD) it would have been one of the great defensive stops in the history of the SB— you had 1st and 1 from the one and it took that contentious call on 4th down to get into the end zone.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 8, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Where is the video of the ref calling it down and then changing it to a touchdown? I looked for it and cannot find it.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I can't find it...
but if you watch this, I’ll tell you where he ran in and changed his call. Not when Ben was in the air, but after he was down and he pushed the ball forward. At the 12 second mark of this video, the call was not a TD. But then he ran in, and while he did, Ben pushed the ball forward (as a player should) and the official changed his call to “TD!”
There used to be a clip of the other angle where you can watch the ref running in, arms waving crossed down, then getting up close and changing it, which I never understood. If the initial call was good, he should have made it from the sideline. But he didn’t, he made it once he got close, and as you watch the last 5 seconds of the video, you tell me if maybe just maybe he was influenced by Big Ben sliding the ball over the goal line after the play should have been dead.
Again, it was a very close play, and I’m not overly bitter that a single call went against us. I felt it was a stop, replay certainly makes it appear to be a stop, while watching it in a sportsbar in Denver the Bronco fans (who hate BOTH our teams) thought it was a stop.
The key is that every call appeared to go against us. But whatever. I just hope we can hurry up and rebuild, I’m tired of this mediocrity. That season gave us a taste of what things can be like as a sports fan, but the fickle football gods took it away in that single game, and we’ve been thirsting for it again ever since.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 8, 2010 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Generally, when you cannot find something it means it doesn’t exist. Until I see that clip I am going to have to say shennanigans.
Also, “arms waving crossed down”…isn’t that the call for an incomplete pass? I thought the sideline refs come in with one arm raised and put their toe at where the ball is marked on a run. I don’t think I have seen them wave their hands.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Fine. Call shenanigans.
You’re right, because you are a Steeler fan you have a more prescient view.
I’m sorry I couldn’t pull up a video from 2005. (Must mean it didn’t happen, because, you know, everything that happened in 2005 is on the interwebs.)
I do know he didn’t have his arms up in the TD fashion until AFTER Ben pushed the ball forward when clearly down. You can say I lack visual evidence, and I’m cool with that. Rewatching that vid, it was damn close and I still don’t think he got in.
Side note on instant replay— when you are watching on a GIANT HD SCREEN at home or a sports bar do you ever wonder how an official can look into a tiny little screen and discern a clearer view on instant replay than we have? It seems like they could simply use a big screen in a darked out tent in the corner of the sideline and get a much clearer view without having to squint into that weird little machine they use.
In fact, why not have an instant replay team— a group of like 9 people in a room in NFL officials headquarters watching giant big screen instant replays and putting them up to an immediate vote as a committee. I’d rather that than one single person viewing and deciding on something as close as a lot of these calls are.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 8, 2010 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I am not sure how you deducted from me calling shenanigans that I have a “knowledge of things before they happen”, especially since we are talking about the past. I was saying you cannot make an argument and expect us to believe it if you do not have proof, which I think is pretty fair.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Fair enough...
I’m hung over. Terrible word choice. Regardless, it did happen that way even if the camera angle can no longer be found.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 8, 2010 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions
I can't find any clips on the internet with a wide enough angle to see the ref,
but pleny of other people saw the same thing. This quote from Kevin Hench from foxsports.com can be found all over the Internet;
Then came Pittsburgh’s first touchdown. Whether you think Roethlisberger broke
the plane of the goal line seems to depend on which team you were rooting for.
The odd part was the line judge seemed to have determined that Big Ben had
come up short as he ran in from the sideline. Since Roethlisberger had been
pushed back well short of the goal line I don’t know what he could have seen as he got closer to the pile that would have made him change his mind. But up went the arms. Had Roethlisberger been ruled short of the plane, that call would no doubt have stood too.
by Mind of no mind on Aug 8, 2010 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, but who?
All that says is he called the touch when he got close to the pile. It does not say that he was “waving his arms below his waist” as to signal the play was down before the end zone.
Also, I like where you cut it short:
too. But you figure the Black and Gold would have pounded it in from the two-inch line on fourth down so there’s not that much here for Seattle fans to complain about
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I actually stated incorrectly that it would have been a 4th down stop. It was 3rd.
However, as early as it was in the game, after getting stopped from the 1 on 1st, 2nd and 3rd downs (assuming Big Ben is ruled short) I have to believe you would have settled for a FG.
That is an assumption on my part, I do admit.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 4:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I think in a post game interview
Cowher said he would have gone for it.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 9, 2010 7:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Fair enough.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, Johnny, but I'll need video of Cowher saying he'd go for it. :)
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. Please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com for more info. Thanks!
Fair Point
Whiskey Chainsaw makes a good point. I have not had the time to look up the video, but I do remember the offical hesitated, and then signaled TD.
But what does that really mean? Truthfully, what does that mean?
Perhaps he meant to signal TD first, but in his excitement ended up beginning the wrong signal (we’ve all done stuff like that in the heat of the moment.) And if the reverse is true, why did he not say to the head ref "he I screwed up, check the replay but I really did not mean to signal TD.)
Again, it comes down to my basic point, he was there, on the line of scimmage, and was in a better position to make the call.
by Hombre de Acero on Aug 9, 2010 5:26 PM EDT up reply actions
As further evidence regarding Bens TD
Was the camera directly on the goal line? Nope. Wasn’t. Check it out…it’s from an angle. Focused in on the goal line it may appear there is no angle, but even an angle of 6-8 inches will drastically alter the perspective.
I do photography for a living. It’s what I pay my rent with, eat my food with, and buy my Steelers tickets and gear with.In fact, photography is how I’m traveling to Europe (again) this month. Angle as well as video/photographic lenses are what I know. Distance ratios and how they affect perspective are what I know.
Any Seahawks fan that offers up the excuse of, “Replays show….” know nothing. Simply ignorant, or innocently misinformed and too lazy to look at all the possible reasons.
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. Please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com for more info. Thanks!
My disappointment in the game goes beyond being a Seahawk fan.
Each and every call against us was disappointing, and every 50/50 call certainly seemed in our eyes to go one way. Such is life. Still, it was a very close game, and really one call made the difference. That single call which was relatively poor has since been acknowledged by the official to be a crappy call. (No, he didn’t literally say it, but Leavy made the call in the 4th, so it has to be one of the calls he regrets.
The call that mattered was the “hold” on Locklear when we moved the ball to the one when Jerremy Fauking Stevens finally did something right catching the ball. But nope, bring it back on a questionable whistle.
And that’s the cruel irony and bitter disappointment of this particular SB. I’m not talking as a Seahawk fan here— I’m talking as a FOOTBALL FAN.
The officials took away from the greatness of the game. The two teams were evenly matched quality teams. (Despite Bryant Gumble giving us “ZERO CHANCE, That’s how much I devalue the NFC.”) He was right— in his mind and the popular media, we had zero chance. It’s a big reason we feel so jobbed. I think I saw 2 or 3 national reporters even give us the respect we deserved in saying we had a prayer. We were a damn good team that year and it’s been forgotten. We were 13-3 with an 11 game win streak that was broken in a throw away loss in GB the last week of the regular season, Indy Colts style. We had a loss week one at Jacksonville, an OT loss at Washington, a throwaway loss at GB with our starters sitting, and the loss in the SB that will forever live in infamy. That’s a damn good team however you stack it, and yet we were given zero chance. I never got that, and never will.
Had the shoe been on the other foot, I’m curious how you guys would feel. Everyone picks against you despite a great season, and you find out one of the officials (who made some questionable calls) grew up and lives in the city of the opposing team? Honestly, would that sit well with you?
I know what every Steeler fan will say now. “Well, you still have to go out and win” That classic answer doesn’t cut it when you feel like your team is playing against a stacked deck to start, and the officials certainly didn’t do anything to change that feeling. Sure, we could have played a perfect game to overcome that. But why does only one team have to play the perfect game, and the other gets to rely on the assistance of the officials? Why can’t they simply call and even game then we see what happens from there between, you know, the two teams???
Forever that SB will be a contentious thing by our two sides, and forgotten by everyone else due to the crappy officiating and lack of excitement.
Had that pass not been taken away however, we would have scored from the 1, don’t doubt that. Alexander behind the greatest left side in the history of the game was pure money.
And then we would have had a game for the ages. Not because we would have scored to win (though that’s admittedly my preference) but because of this—it would have been a 4th quarter comeback with 4 minutes left.
THEN— had the Steelers drove and scored again that game would have had two 4th Quarter lead changed in the last five minutes of a SB and EVERYONE (even Seahawk fans) would have looked back at that SB and thought “Holy Hell, that was an amazing game!”
Instead, we get an apology 5 years later from an official, about a crappy game most everyone else has forgotten, a game that we will never admit you guys won and you can no longer argue the officials messed up in. Just disappointing all the way around.
It could have been one of the all time great SB’s, and instead it’s a national punchline for how bitter seattle fans are (must be the rainy weather, and bad coffee), how arrogantly assumptive Steeler fans (‘one of the thumb’— the rest of the nation hated you for that), and above all else, crappy officiating.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
I’m not talking as a Seahawk fan here— I’m talking as a FOOTBALL FAN.
It sure sounds like you are just talking like a Seahawk fan.
No, he didn’t literally say it, but Leavy made the call in the 4th, so it has to be one of the calls he regrets.
That is an assumption, your assumption and opinion. It should not be confused with fact.
Also, the point was brought up before, but you might not have seen it. If this ref who “loves the Steelers because he was born there” really felt that way, why wouldn’t he come out and say anything at all? If his ties were with the Steelers, why would he rehash this stupid debate?
Personally, I think the arguments that the NFL is bias are really stupid. The validity behind them is generally pretty poor and shaky at best. The Steelers have had tons of awful calls the have cost them before. Ask anyone here how often they think James Harrison gets held and you will generally hear “on every play” as a unified response.
The Steelers made big plays and won the game. Its over and no amount of complaining or other rehashing will ever get your team a ring.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Not that I would expect anything other than a singularly Steeler perspective here...
I came at that from a very reasonable angle. Am I passionate about it? Absolutely. Do I think we got jobbed? Quite a bit. Do I think it took away from the game as a football fan? Yes.
You came at it solely from a Steeler perspective. Basically your argument is “we won, you didn’t, bad calls happen (to you in the SB, to us in general) and get over it.”
“The Steelers have had tons of awful calls cost them before.” I don’t disagree. Ever had it happen repeatedly in the Super Bowl? Nope. Every team has tons of awful calls against them, us included. Still, we’re the only team that can say an official apologized for fauking up and missing calls against us in the Super Bowl. Sort of a different magnitude, isn’t it?
Ask casual fans of football, or passionate fans of other teams that have no inherent interest in that game, and they’ll generally agree that SB XL left something to be desired, as I stated, AS A FOOTBALL FAN. As a Seahawk fan its a bitter pill to swallow. As a football fan it’s a forgotten game, when it didn’t have to be if the officials wouldn’t have gotten in the way. It could have been one of the all time greats (to the entire country, not just western PA) and we wouldn’t even of had to win for me to feel that— we would have just not had a chance to win taken away, that’s all.
You really are splitting hairs when you say it is my opinion and an assumption that the hold was one of the bad calls. The official said, “It was a tough thing for me. I kicked two calls in the fourth quarter and I impacted the game, and as an official you never want to do that. It left me with a lot of sleepless nights, and I think about it constantly. I’ll go to my grave wishing that I’d been better … I know that I did my best at that time, but it wasn’t good enough … When we make mistakes, you got to step up and own them. It’s something that all officials have to deal with, but unfortunately when you have to deal with it in the Super Bowl it’s difficult”
I just checked the play by play. One thing I was wrong on— had we scored, it would have been around 5 minutes into the 4th quarter, not with 5 minutes left. However, there were only two penalties against us in the 4th. The holding call, and the “clipping” on Hasselbeck. Can we use some deductive reasoning and assume it was the holding call that took away a significant scoring opportunity he was referencing, or do I need to get him to literally state the play? Be reasonable, man.
I didn’t say the NFL was biased, nor did I say the official intentionally was. I asked you, if the roles were reversed, if you would feel it was a tad off. That’s all. Not sure where “loves the Steelers because he was born there” comes from, but it wasn’t me.
I was simply saying we felt long odds of getting a fair crack going into the game, and that feeling turned out to be… what’s the word? Prescient.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 8, 2010 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s a reasonable angle from your Seahawk fan perspective, sure. However, that is an opinion that will be bias toward them, no matter how hard you try. Any close call, you want it to go your way, or else it is a bad, wrong, or missed call.
You think the Roethlisberger TD was called wrong or late or whatever. I think he broke the plane and it was called that way. Obviously, we disagree even after both looking at the same replay over and over. If two people can disagree so much, its pretty safe to say that any undisputable evidence against the TD is not there. Can we determine when the ref signaled it a TD or what made him think it was a TD? No, and to assume that he called it after Ben moved it forward is just that, an assumption.
You probably think that PI in the endzone was not. I really don’t know how you could think it is not. Sure, you can compare it to other things that were not called, but that is irrelevant. If you push off a player to change your direction its PI. That is what he did. That is PI.
The clipping call could have gone either way. He did clip the guy without the ball, but he wasn’t going after with him. That is one of those weird gaps in rules where two rules overlap each other and there is that gray area.
The holding call I cannot recall the exact play and I can’t find video of it, do you have it by chance?
As far as “reversed” roles go, I really don’t take calls I see as blown this far. I don’t think I have talked to a Seahawks fan since that day that has not brought up the SB and yakked about the shoulda-coulda-wouldas. When a bad one happens I usually curse and get annoyed. However, I realize that there is plenty of time in a game and that blown calls go both ways. Sure, that call could cost us the game, but at the same time maybe we should have performed better and not made a single play the only hope for us having a chance (i.e. with an offense like yours you shoulda had more than 10 points going into the 4th). That is my take.
And just for the record, I don’t really care how great of a game the SB ends up being if my team is in it. I just want to win. I’d take a 30-0 first half that put the entire nation to sleep if it meant my team was going to win.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Okay, so you call me out for assumptions...
and then assume I think the PI in the endzone was not one.
Pot, meet kettle.
Again, you are only looking at this from a Seahawks/Steelers perspective. You are happy, your team won. I am sad, my team lost. But again, my primary point was that BOTH TEAMS were robbed, as were the fans, by the officials interference. You may think, “No way, we won the game, we weren’t robbed.” However, you were. Because Seahawk fans will never acknowledge your team as superior in the game. And again, tell me how many fans outside Western PA and the PNW still remember ANYTHING about that game but the crappy officiating. I’ve never once had a neutral fan
You may have won, and you may have the ring, but it’s a hollow victory when only the winners see value in it…
The “holding” was when Joey Porter put his body on about a 30% angle pushing against Locklear. When he fell due to bad body balance, Locklear fell on top of him. The ref called holding. After the season, the NFL made a modest change in the terminology of holding in the rule book, stating something like the official must SEE the hold instead of assuming it happened.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 2:57 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't believe it's an assumption on which calls he regrets,
his exact words where
I kicked two calls in the fourth quarter and I impacted the game and as an official you never want to do that. It left me with a lot of sleepless nights and I think about it constantly. I’ll go to my grave wishing that I’d been better.
correct me if I’m wrong, but according to reporters, there were only two penalties called in the 4th quarter, the hold that reversed the catch on the 1 yardline, and the call on Hasselbeck when he made the tackle.
Also Bill Leavy is not the ref that was born and raised in Pittsburgh, it was the ref that called Jackson for pass interference. No matter how good or bad his performance was in calling the game, he should never have been allowed to ref that game to begin with.
by Mind of no mind on Aug 8, 2010 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Are penalties the only types of calls that refs make?
Also, why shouldn’t he be allowed to ref the game? I was born just outside of Baltimore. Should I not be allowed to ref a SB if the Ravens were in it?
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 8, 2010 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions
i understand where you're coming from
i can understand how the entire situation from your side is & was very frustrating, but try to look at it from our point of view. the situation doesn’t justify how your fanbase (generally speaking) and members of your team went about behaving afterward while expecting us to tolerate it or even agree.
i go to school with a girl from seattle and anytime the subject of football comes up she complains about that super bowl loss. it’s often when she over hears a conversation i’m having with my friends about a game this past weekend. this is a girl that has probably watches 1 or 2 NFL games a year & she’s bringing up a subject that happened over 4 years ago and only tangentially related to the conversation at hand.
you have to realize that by putting so much blame on the officiating it comes across as you and your team is trying to cheapen our championship and refusing to admit our team was better than yours that day. even your HC publicly blamed the loss on officiating. that’s implying we didn’t earn the win & we wouldnt have won if it the officiating was “fairer.” you even say it yourself :
…a game that we will never admit you guys won…you also claim that you had to be “perfect” to overcome the “bad” officiating, but that’s a pretty narrow minded view point when your team didnt even play well. for instance, yeah you probably would have gotten a TD if there was no holding call (which i still say it should have been called) but poor officiated had nothing to do with hasselbeck throwing a pick a few plays later. if he doesn’t you probably get a field goal & all of a sudden its 13-14. that puts more pressure on us and maybe it causes ben to thrown another INT and you win.
your team didn’t have to play “perfect” to over come the officiating…they just had to play a little better. it was a close game, closer than the score showed at the end, but the team that played the best that day ended up winning.
You forget that Seattle well out-gained the Steelers despite the longest TD run in SB history, and a long WR pass.
you have to realize that by putting so much blame on the officiating it comes across as you and your team is trying to cheapen our championship and refusing to admit our team was better than yours that day.
It comes across that way to you because you don’t want your championship cheapened, not because Seattle fans want you to feel that way.
You are mis-construing a game where Seattle played better than Pittsburgh during much of the game, but could not finish drives and allowed a few huge plays that gave the Steelers points. It was a very good example of a game of inches, where a few key plays made a huge difference on the scoreboard. The Steelers at the same time, DID make those plays. It’s not Pittsburgh’s fault that the Seahawks 3rd string safety was playing, and was out of position on two big plays, or that on very close plays (that were the result of players on both teams competing their hardest) the referees ended up giving them the call. Pittsburgh won that SB far more than they were given it, but Seattle outplayed them for much of that game.
60 yards isn't "well out gained"
i’d argue it’s all about the big plays. you can drive the length of the field every single drive but if you throw an int or fumble the ball away on the opponents 1 yardline that drive meant nothing. i agree it was a close game, though.
i do agree with your assessment below.
Reading a little closer, I realize that I did not address your point.
i can understand how the entire situation from your side is & was very frustrating, but try to look at it from our point of view. the situation doesn’t justify how your fanbase (generally speaking) and members of your team went about behaving afterward while expecting us to tolerate it or even agree.
i go to school with a girl from seattle and anytime the subject of football comes up she complains about that super bowl loss. it’s often when she over hears a conversation i’m having with my friends about a game this past weekend. this is a girl that has probably watches 1 or 2 NFL games a year & she’s bringing up a subject that happened over 4 years ago and only tangentially related to the conversation at hand.
Your example perfectly illustrates the problem. A large percentage of any fanbase are people who are not football geniuses, or are only mildly understanding of the basic rules, let alone the nuances.
I’m sure you have tons of fans that are “Steelers fans” that you can’t stand, even more than we do because you are such a popular team for bandwagon and fringe fans.
You don't "understand where I'm coming from."
And never will.
The girl from Seattle? She is the perfect example of the casual fan that you get to listen to FOR THE REST OF YOUR LIFE because the officials did a poor job. As I said above, it is a shame from a football perspective that the officials made the decisions they did, because it basically forced this upon you. We’ll never admit you won, because we will never feel the better team on the field that day got an equal chance to win.
It truly could have been one of the all time great SB’s, WIN OR LOSE, and we would have begrudgingly admired the Steelers’ efforts and endeavors on the field. But you have the officials to thank for that opportunity being taken from you.
Close your eyes for a second. Imagine this— a world where there wasn’t a Seahawk fan alive that is bitter about that game? Hard to fathom, isn’t it? Yet that could have been the case, had a couple calls— even a SINGLE CALL, the holding in the 4th, not gone against us.
But that isn’t the case, is it? So you’ll just have to take your SB victory that you believe is earned and we never will, and you get to deal with all the bitter Seahawk fans in return. Enjoy that win the same way the USSR enjoys its gold medal Olympic basketball victory in 1972— with the rest of the world either indifferent about it, or not acknowledging it due to the actions of the officials.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions
i guess you're just really looking for a pity party
and you’re not going to get one a steelers blog.
i’m not sure how you can imply a person who only watches the super bowl every year (and that’s it) is a casual, yet informed fan. i used that example to paint the picture of a person who’s interested enough to express an opinion unsolicited and inappropriately, yet not interested enough to develop her own opinion… aka she’s using the collective opinion of seattle as hers instead. it seems that opinion & that way of expressing it is pervasive w/ many seattle fans & in the seahawks locker room.
you admit you’ll never give us credit for winning a game, yet you claimed you’re trying to look at the situation from an unbiased, football fan point of view. you’re quick to criticize steelers fans from looking at it from their point of view, when we never claimed otherwise. doesnt seem quite right.
there is no such thing as a completely fair game. period. it’s nice to strive for them, but it’s a goal that’s impossible to reach. games are refereed by human beings that make unintentional mistakes. however 99% of games are relatively fair, which super bowl XL was.
i’ll agree seattle seemed unlucky in that most of the 50/50 calls went against them, but again the seahawks did more than their fair share of poor playing and putting themselves in bad positions to deserve to loss the game. if i was you, i’d be pissed at the officials if my team lost while playing good football and there were a few questionable calls made against them. not so much if they played poorly and lost with a few questionable calls against them because the loss is on their shoulders. it always starts with your team. and it doesnt make sense to me this whole, “i’d be okay if we lost, played crappy, and but it was an exciting game. i’m not okay if we lose, we played crappy, and it wasn’t exciting.”
comparing our championship to a game were the officials blatantly robbed a team at the buzzer so they never had the opportunity to do something about it totally different than this situation. even IF bad calls were made, you had opportunities to over come them and couldn’t.
and for those reasons, i seriously doubt you would have ever admitted we won super bowl XL fairly unless every single call went your way.
Time for a made-up "Tomlinism"
“I don’t walk past six obnoxiously uninformed collegiate females on the way to work….”
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. Please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com for more info. Thanks!
Alexander behind the "greatest left side in the history of the game" had not done anything all game, nor did he/they.
I can doubt the veracity of your claim pretty easily…
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. Please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com for more info. Thanks!
i wonder why the official has changed his mind about the calls
assuming he felt the 2 bad calls were the holding call and the low block call i find it really interesting he thinks he made bad calls. these calls weren’t something were he wasn’t paying attention or he accidentally blew his whistle too early (like hochuli with cutler’s fumble against the broncos 2 years ago). if he had felt he shouldn’t have made those calls at the time, they could have waved off the flags after they were thrown. but he and the rest of the crew didn’t.
the only logical idea that i can think of is that he later saw other viewpoints or replays that, in his mind, made his calls wrong. but if that’s the case, he shouldn’t feel bad about it because he’s only privy to his viewpoint in real time and what the rest of his crew sees to make calls. from his viewpoint it obviously looked like a penalty and thus the calls should have been made.
"He later saw other viewpoints or replays that, in his mind, made his calls wrong."
You go on to say he shouldn’t feel bad, he did the best he could at the time. Sorry, I simply don’t feel the same way.
On the same day Jim Joyce (class act if ever there was) apologized to Armando Galarraga for ruining his shot at baseball immortality Angel Hernandez (as arrogant an official as there is in professional sports) was proven wrong by replays when he called a runner out for not tagging 3rd base and costing a team a win.
By your standards, Angel’s quote (something like “I saw what I saw”) means he shouldn’t look back with any regret, right? Nor should Joyce? And Joyce shouldn’t have apologized either, right? Because, I mean, he totally shouldn’t feel bad because he’s only privy to his viewpoint in real time, right?
Nope. Smart people change their minds when they realize they’re wrong. They take what they know and re-evaluate going forward. I applaud Leavy for coming and getting of his chest the fact that he feels he made mistakes, and he’ll try to do better next time. I’m incredibly forgiving when an official simply tells me, “Sorry Coach, I missed that one. I’ll try to catch it next time.” When they always tell me they’re right (and never ever admit a mistake) however, that’s when I have to wonder about their intelligence and their integrity.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 3:53 AM EDT up reply actions
there's a difference between the 2 situations
one is a “what i thought i saw and what i should have seen” situation. aka the baseball umpire calling a player safe at 1st base when the guy is out. the umpire was in the usual position and had the proper vantage point to make the correct call, but for whatever reason didnt see the call correctly.
i’m saying what if this situation is a “from my angle it definitely looks like holding.” aka from the ref’s view point any other ref would call holding. he’s in the usual position and feels he has the proper vantage point to make the correct call. however, from a different angle he realizes he didnt make the right call. but the thing is it’s impossible for him to have seen that angle during the game or have been able to judge the play any differently.
so one is a situation were a person just made a bad mistake. the other is were any person doing their job properly would have made the mistake. it’s okay to try to improve, get better, and admit mistakes. it’s another thing to let a mistake that one could argue SHOULD be made haunt you at night and probably negatively affect the way you referee future games.
and i appreciate you twisting my words with what i was trying to point out.
on a somewhat related note
the Steelers were hit by penalties in the later stages of the Arizona – Pitt Super Bowl (hell, the refs actually gave the Cardinals 2 points), and we still went out there and won that.
The fact of the matter is, bad calls or legit calls you still can win a game if you play well. Stevens dropped a lot of passes, the Seahawks O-line did hold a lot (even if you don’t believe the controversial hold was a hold, there were still many other legit holdings), Hasselbeck through a horrible INT, Brown missed a couple of field goals (right? or was it just one?), and the Seattle coaching was rather questionable (“we got the league MVP? eh, we don’t need to use him that much”).
If the refs were on our side I could guarantee you Ben’s QB rating would have been much higher.
To be honest, it's never been a good idea to argue holds, for either side.
Too many holds are not called for it to be an issue worth arguing. It was a close play that often is not called, much like the offensive PI that was called against Seattle, but that doesn’t make it a wrong call.
I thought Haggan was off-sides on that play, and the one before it, and that concerned me more than the holding call.
You also had a blatant clipping NOT called that gave you a crucial interception TD.
Take that TD away (and it should have been a clip) and the monstrous momentum swing perhaps never happens.
I had a roommate last year from Arizona, first die-hard Card fan I’d ever met. About the only thing we COULD agree on was that you guys got some huge calls in SB’s against the NFC West. I wish I could see you explain to him why that clip wasn’t a clip and shouldn’t have been called.
As for your other “facts” — you gave nothing of evidence but weak opinion. Do you even know how many drops Stevens had? Do you know that the offensive line you say “did hold a lot” would have done so COMPLETELY COUNTER to the entire rest of the season, as we were among the least penalized offensive line in the league, starting perhaps the best LT LG combo in the history of the NFL? But, you know, I’m sure we held all the time though because your team was just so incredibly awesome we had to hold to stop you when we didn’t all year long, right? (And your line didn’t, right? Or, perhaps, your line did, but they weren’t called for it? Because, you know, sometimes officials have a bad game and all the 50/50 calls go one way, and a few of the 80/20 calls go the wrong way?)
As for your “if the refs were on your side” comment— that’s just crap, as was all of your evidence. Fine, believe it if you will, but know that only Pittsburgh fans believe that game was well officiated. Remember, not even the official who made the calls believed it was well officiated. But hey, you know, whatever.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 4:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Wow...
only Pittsburgh fans believe that game was well officiated.
That, my Northward friend, is complete BIRDSHIT! (see what I did there?)
Please provide me proof that anyone here says that game was called right down the line. You can’t do it, because neither side is saying that.
Yes, there were some cheap calls, but you will NEVER convince me they were “game deciding” ones.
Oh yeah, tell whoever runs that site of yours over there that I really appreciate him hiding my comments. Very mature.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
Yeah, that was incredibly witty of you.
And not true.
I’ve lived in Denver (where they hate Hawks and Steelers equally) and traveled all around the country for work, and I’ve yet to meet a neutral fan that believes the game was well officiated.
Do I believe it was a conspiracy? No. Do I think one team got a lot of breaks the other did? Yes. Strangely, it’s often neutral fans that bring out the conspiracy theory talk. I just think it was a game the officials could have done a better job on, and having one of them ADMIT he blew a critical call that pretty much cost us a TD is a certain level of vindication for us that you can’t take away by arguing that you think it was fairly (and evenly) officiated. How taking away a TD for the lead in the 4th quarter isn’t a “game deciding” call I have no idea. You’ll even notice in one of my longer posts I say it took away from the Steelers opportunity to win a (now great) game in the 4th quarter with a comeback.
As far as hiding comments, they are hypercritical of trolling. I would like to think that I am not trolling here, but am trying to keep an even keel in this dialog. I trust if I do go over the line I would get a black and gold wrist slap just like I’m sure you did over at FieldGulls.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Notice how the people who responded to you
And the Steeler fans in this thread are saying the game was not fairly officiated, yet you keep arguing that we did.
We just don’t think that we won because of bad officiating.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 9, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah...
Do I think one team got a lot of breaks the other did? Yes.
Same answer, yes. Do I think you guys got purposely jobbed? No.
having one of them ADMIT he blew a critical call that pretty much cost us a TD
I don’t know about you, but I’m pretty sure being down at the 1 yard line isn’t a TD.
just like I’m sure you did over at FieldGulls.
Yeah, um, sure. If it hadn’t been hidden, I would direct you to go read it first before making assumptions that I was trolling. I wasn’t (as if you really care), it was actually a well formulated post about how everybody should just let it go. Responding, in point of fact, to a well thought out comment from one of your own. Wherein he stated the same sentiment of letting it go and moving on.
That is one of the main reasons I hate (most of) the fans of your team. Notice I didn’t say I hate your team, because I don’t. Just the crybaby fans that won’t shut up about how the Steelers “stole” a Super Bowl that should have been theirs.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
In 2005, being at the 1 with Alexander behind Walter Jones and Steve Hutchinson was as sure a thing as there is.
And, I’m curious, here— are you saying you hate me then? Kind of a not real nice thing to say or imply about someone…
Most of all I simply wish the shoe was on the other foot. I wish we would have gotten the calls and you felt jobbed. It isn’t easy being a sportsfan from Seattle. Only Cleveland can even be in the discussion about who has it worst. Ever see the movie “The Best Of Times?”
For one shining season, we were Taft High School led by Reno Hightower. But instead of a dropped pass by Robin Williams to cost them their one shot at immortality, we got bad calls that will forever haunt us, and now we’ve returned to the bowels of lethargy.
Sucks being haunted like this. I wouldn’t wish it even on my most hated rival… and once your haunted like this, with a feeling of bitterness that you were robbed and there isn’t a damn thing you can do about it, all the “you should get over it” talk in the world does nothing to quell it.
Nope. Not gonna get over it, and not gonna ever feel like we got a fair even shot. Mistakes were made by both teams on the field, but only one team had to play a superior game to not just overcome their own mistakes and their opponents successes, but the officials too.
You can take the ring as your solace. (And I would trade your solace for ours). Ours only comes from knowing we got jobbed, the best team didn’t win that day, and even the official admitted he messed up pretty significantly, costing us. And you will never convince me otherwise.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Same old song and dance
I hate (most of) the fans of your team
That means I don’t hate you specifically.
you will never convince me otherwise
I’m not trying to. It does, however, sound like you are here trying to convince us. To what, I don’t know. Maybe to admit you got purposely jobbed? That the league wanted us to win, and made the official make those crappy calls? We never will, so you are wasting your time.
Do you hear us complaining about Super Bowl 30? Yes, but not about the refs. We complain about Niel O’assface.
How about you complain about something legitimate. Like, say, Fatty Holmgren not using the league MVP properly the entire game. Or, how about your defense allowing the longest rushing touchdown in Super Bowl history. Those are things you can and should complain about. Not two calls made by a human being. Because humans never make mistakes, right?
But, it’s okay, he confessed and feels horrible about it. Still doesn’t make your team the champions. That’s why I say get over it. All your hate, bitterness and haunted feeling isn’t going to change anything. It’s not good to hold onto such things. Causes ulcers, and such.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
I think an official blowing a call that led to a lack of an opportunity from the one yard line was something legitimate.
The issue with the D giving up the long TD was tremendously disappointing. I blame Kenny Hamlin. Dude went out partying and got hit over the head, and his Seahawk career was over. I don’t mind guys getting injured in the game— things happen. But when you let your team down because you are out at Pioneer Square and you get yourself hurt— that sucks. Then our 2nd SS went down, leaving a bench warmer in to be out of position.
On utilizing Alexander— I loved our game plan. We came out passing and attacked you. However, several times we had crucial drops (our fault) or questionable calls (not our fault) neutralize the attack.
That doesn’t excuse his time management however.
Nor does it excuse Josh Brown for missing two FG’s, and our craptastic punter for putting just about every punt that game into the end zone.
Still, despite all my bitching remember this— had the hold NOT been called, I wouldn’t bitch like I do now. Because we would have scored from the one to take the lead in the SB, a SB we statistically owned.
Then if you would then have gone down and scored, there’s nothing we could say. But as is, the calls against us became the defining microcosms of the game.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions
You don't know for sure you would have scored
Look at our Colts game. Everyone KNEW Bettis was just going to pound it in. We had been doing that all game, but lo and behold! Fumble!
All of this is just speculation on your part. I understand the fact that you are upset because we will never know what would have happened had that “phantom” holding call been overlooked.
Another thing: I saw that video clip a friend of yours posted in the fanshot over there. Haggans was NOT offsides. At best it was a neutral zone infraction, and he jumped the count. Look very closely at that video…It’s shot from an angle that makes it seem like he’s offsides. I’m sure that’s why he chose that particular shot of the play. Besides, there are two refs that stand right on the line of scrimmage to make sure that neutral zone infractions don’t happen. Are you saying that BOTH of those line judges were paid off?
Fact of the matter is, Haggans got a great jump off the ball, and your guy couldn’t block him. Hence, the hold. And it was BLATANTLY clear in the video that he was absolutely MAULED by your RT.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
I never said anyone was paid off.
Nor was whoever posted it my friend…
We had a redzone TD percentage of 71% that year, best in the league.
We had an 81% 4th down conversion rate.
We had the greatest left side of a line in the history of the NFL.
We had the League MVP at running back, a guy that scored 27 TD’s that year on the ground.
Yeah, safe to say I’m pretty confident we would have scored with 4 downs from the 1 yard line.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 10, 2010 2:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Here it is

Would you look at that? Locklear is BEHIND Haggans! If that’s not a hold, then I’m a fucking monkey.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
That wasn't the hold that took away the pass to the one.
That one WAS called, remember. And I don’t dispute it.
Not sure about the movement, depends where he was lined up. He definitely jumped before the ball was snapped though, and so did the DT. Did they go over the line? Don’t know. I think you could call encroachment on the DT though.
So basically.. you COULD call offsides, or encroachment. Neither was called. You could call hold. And it was called.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 10, 2010 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions
You know you can jump before the ball is snapped?
Right? As long as your are behind the line of scrimmage?
I took the gif and found the vanishing points of the two lines in the frame the second before the snap. I drew a line from the ball to Haggans position from that line. Haggan is clearly behind it:

"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 10, 2010 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions
His foot looks like it's 6 inches behind the line.
His knee is forward of his foot, and his arm and head are forward of that. Account for the angle of the shot and it looks like he’s across.
6 inches?
Looks like almost a foot or more.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 11, 2010 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Looking at the visible hash mark closest to your line, it's the 43rd yardline.
The 45th is where Locklear’s hand is. It looks like the amount of space between the green line and that hash is less than a foot. His toe(off-screen) looks forward of that hash, but lets just call it the hash mark.
With the angle of his leg, and how much forward of that is helmet and left arm are, he seems to be offsides. And that is with no ball movement. But there is no view without this particular angle, so I can’t post a picture and prove one way, and you can’t post a picture and prove another. At the very least it is clear from this picture that he was close to a neutral zone infraction, but there is no value in me arguing that he’s across.
Watch the video, genius.
That’s the 20 yard line Locklear’s hand is on. The play in the video is the “phantom” holding call that negated the pass to the 1 yard line.
You really need to learn to read the entire thread before just jumping in and making dumbass comments that have already been discussed. :)
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
by Steel Spike on Aug 13, 2010 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Check out my reply to you in the Ravensgamethread.
The Orioles are going to open a can of Buck-Wieser on your ass......
by Zachary Beard on Aug 13, 2010 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't have a copy of the game any more.
Locklear’s foot is on a symbol, and normally that would be a midfield type of thing, but you are right. In the SB, They have the SB logos on the field as well. So that would put his hand on the 20 as you say, and make that has the 18 yardline, Thanks for the correction.
What kind of little sissies do you have running
that site of yours over there?
I got banned for calling someone a dick, who was being a dick. I guess it’s okay for you assholes to do it, but not me right?
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
it might be worth pointing out
i think cashless has been pretty respectful while debating on this site…even if i disagree with what he has to say
Shoosh. Let me vent a bit.
I know he has been fairly respectful, but I can’t say this over there anymore.
I can do it all I want over here.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
Hey John, I copy/pasted this
over on the seahawks blog. Right under the original video I copy/pasted over here.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
by Steel Spike on Aug 10, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions
yes, it this play was "the" hold that took away the pass
you can see while watching the play that the ball was spotted on the 19 yardline of pittsburgh. if you check the play by play on nfl.com of the game, the ONLY play the entire game with the ball spotted on the steeler’s 19 is “the” holding call.
so you realize you just admitted the holding should have been called on the play basing your entire argument that the steelers didnt deserve the win and your team was robbed?
My comment on camera angles above was in reference to an angle of 6-8 inches affecting perspective.
But this angle? Seriously? Any Seahawks fan with good conscience wants to argue this as offsides? Wow. Just….wow. Uninformed. Basic geometry guys.
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. Please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com for more info. Thanks!
the best team didn’t win that day,
That is a sentence that makes Steeler fans hate Seattle fans. What a load of crap.
First of all, you didn’t even have the best rushing team that year. The Falcons and Broncos averaged more yards per game and more yards per attempt. We were 5th over all, not far separated from the Seahawks. Very close numbers. Your offensive rank overall was better than ours, however our defensive rank was much better than yours. I am not sure how you think you were the better team.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 9, 2010 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Well...
I am not sure how you think you were the better team.
One word, Johnny: Homerism.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
Either Homerism Or stats?
Statistic Pittsburgh Steelers Seattle Seahawks
Points scored per game 24.3 (9th) 28.2 (1st)
Points allowed per game 16.1 (3rd, tied) 16.9 (7th)
Rushing yards gained per game 138.9 (5th) 153.6 (3rd)
Rushing yards allowed per game 86.0 (3rd) 94.4 (5th)
Passing yards gained per game 182.9 (24th) 216.1 (13th)
Passing yards allowed per game 198.0 (16th) 222.4 (25th)
Yards gained per play 5.4 (10th) 5.8 (2nd)
Yards allowed per play 4.6 (3rd) 4.9 (10th)
Time of possession per game 31:16 (8th) 29:17 (21st)
Third-down conversion percentage 35.4 (23rd) 39.6 (13th, tied)
Third-down conversion percentage allowed 39.7 (20th) 38.0 (16th)
Fourth-down conversion percentage 41.7 (20th) 87.5 (1st)
Fourth-down conversion percentage allowed 35.3 (8th) 63.2 (26th)
Red zone touchdown conversion percentage 60.7 (4th, tied) 71.7 (1st)
Red zone touchdown conversion percentage allowed 40.4 (2nd) 47.9 (10th, tied)
Total turnover differential +7 (9th, tied) +10 (7th)
And in the game—
Hawks Steelers
First downs 20 14
Third down efficiency 5-17 8-15
Fourth down efficiency 1-2 0-0
Total yards 396 339
Passing yards 259 158
Passing – Completions-attempts 26-49 10-22
Passing – Yards per pass 5.0 6.9
Rushing yards 137 181
Rushing attempts 25 33
Yards per rush 5.5 5.5
Penalties-yards 7-70 3-20
Sacks against 3-14 1-8
Turnovers 1 2
Fumbles-lost 0-0 0-0
Interceptions thrown 1 2
Time of possession 33:02 26:58
You had more rushing yards— but take away the home run play, and you don’t. Take away the penalties all going one way and the numbers are actually pretty one sided to our end. And remember, you had 2 false start/procedure penalties your first possession, so you essentially (in theory) played penalty free the other 57 minutes of the game (unless all those 50/50 calls they called on us they didn’t on you?)
So yeah, more yardage more time of possession more first downs. How on earth would I ever feel you were the better team that day?
You were the luckier team that day, not the better one.
Lucky on big plays working out your way not ours, lucky on the officials making some mistakes.
Better? No. Luckier? Without a doubt.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Spit out all the stats you want.
Good teams win games they are supposed to win. Great teams win them even when things don’t go their way.
Okay, your team had better stats. Passing is kind of a given: A veteran passer Vs. a second year one. Your team ran the West Coast Offense. Ours was a power running team. Ben completed 10 passes. Out of 22 attempts. 158 passing yards on 10 completions? I’ll take that over what you did. Plus, I think your math is a little squiffy: 10 completions for 158 yards does NOT equal 6.9 yards.
That’s why you HAVE to blame the refs. Because even though you were the “better” team, you still lost. It couldn’t be because we were the more opportunistic team, and took advantage when we could to overcome our “lesser” performance, oh no, not that.
As opposing quarterbacks crouched under center, Lambert pumped his legs up and down, thumping the turf like a war drum. He mouthed threats to opposing running backs that would make even the most hardened Catholic nun weep for humanity. He fulfilled those threats with coldblooded suplex tackles. He may or may not have chain-smoked at halftime, depending on who you ask.
For sixty minutes each Sunday, Jack Lambert was a demon.
Not my stats, I cut and pasted.
All things being equal (and they weren’t) we win 7 of 10 times.
You were the luckier team. But alas, luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity, and we were ill prepared for being unlucky.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 10, 2010 2:40 AM EDT up reply actions
you realize the biggest stats up there for predicting who wins games
are probably turnovers & 3rd down efficiency? and we won those categories. we were comparable in total yards & the reason why you dominated TOP and first downs is because we scored twice on long TD’s. i do admit i don’t have any citation to be able to back up that those 2 are more important than rest except them being constantly emphasized by announcers during games.
obviously i’m excluding penalties, but that can also be argued that your team played sloppier that day and pushed the gray area of calls more frequently than ours did.
Hmm..
You realize we won the turnover battle? You had two, we had one.
3rd down efficiency, I agree, is critical as well.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 10, 2010 2:43 AM EDT up reply actions
You had more rushing yards— but take away the home run play, and you don’t.
This argument is always so illogical. Yeah…just take away that play we did really good on. Just throw it out, it doesn’t count because it makes my argument sound better. What?
Also, I like how you negate one of the most important stats when you say you it was one sided, and that is 3rd down conversions. We were over 50% and you were under 33%. That is huge.
Also, more yards is not directly proportional to more points. Just look at our the Steelers Vikings game from this past year. Also, keep in mind one of our TDs was scored on a short field on a turnover. And I thought the Colts proved this year that ToP isn’t that important.
We certainly had more luck, but there is no way in hell you can argue you were the better team. That is a pretty evenly matched game.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 10, 2010 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions
"That is a pretty evenly matched game."
Thank you. It’s rare I hear a Steeler fan even acknowledge that much.
I agree. Which is why the officials blowing calls one way was so damn costly. They tipped the scales on what could have been the greatest SB in history, one between two evenly matched teams who could have duked it out in a back and forth game with multiple lead changes and thrills for all, instead of just for Steeler fans.
Which is my original point— as football fans, we were all cheated that day. Not only Seahawk fans, but all football fans. (And I would have been just fine losing THAT game, but not the one we got instead.)
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 10, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions
sore loser
get over it
Healing from my new tattoos
Franco made that play because he never quit on the play. He kept running, he kept hustling. Good things happen to people who hustle."
o wtf? grow up man
“fact of the matter” is just a phrase, don’t take it literally. Of course those words I gave are my opinion just like yours are your opinion.
The “blatant” clipping call wasn’t blatant at all.In fact, if it was anything it would have been a block in the back, not clipping. It was close I’ll give you that, and really could have gone either way. Woodley may have pushed him in the side or it may have been in the back, but the refs didn’t call it because they didn’t see it or didn’t see it as a penalty. You also forgot to mention how Fitzgerald also committed a penalty on that play by running out of bounds and then being the first to touch the ball carrier. Can’t believe you are trying to discount the best play in Super Bowl history with a iffy penalty call…
Really? you asked a die-hard Cards fan if he got screwed in the Super Bowl?
I know that I have probably watched that Super Bowl game more than you have, in fact I watched it last night before I typed that post. No, I did not count how many times Steven’s dropped a pass but he dropped a few crucial ones. And yes, you’re offensive line held a lot, a good pass rush tends to do that to people.
And to claim I gave no evidence is asinine. Brown did miss two field goals, Hasselbeck did throw a horrible INT.
I never said the game was well officiated, don’t put words in my mouth. I said you can still win in-spite of bad calls (see Pitt’s latest Super Bowl). And Leavy, who made the calls, never said it was poorly officiated, he said he blew two calls. Big difference. One of the calls didn’t even matter really.
"One of the calls didn't even matter really."
The other one did. Significantly. Altered the course of history.
I don’t really care about the Cards game, I didn’t mean to open that can of worms. Simply saying that in two SB’s—- the one game that matters the most and all eyes are on— most fans, neutral even, will say you guys got a lot more calls than went against you. Popular opinion doesn’t mean a hell of a lot I know, but it is what it is and you can’t change that by arguing that you feel like you got the short end of the stick. (Particularly in XL, I’ll grant you the other one. I actually stopped watching at half to hook up with a hot lawyer. But then, it was my two least favorite teams playing, so that’s not a surprise.)
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Please watch the interception return again
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EoxSFBHbA80
Also, notice the hold on Timmons that happens in the first 3 seconds of the play and is uncalled.
Anyway, Woodley makes the block around 27 seconds. When he goes for the block he initially has one hand on his chest and one on his back. The “defender” tries to avoid his arms and dips his shoulder which moves Woodley’s hand to his shoulder as Woodley is already pushing him. If you are talking about a clip on that play…I don’t even see one remotely close to being a clip.
"I'm from Maryland, and no one can beat me!"
by John Stephens on Aug 9, 2010 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Fair enough.
I still see it as a block in the back, but I can acknowledge your side of it. Doesn’t excuse the terrible pass either.
Random note— I’m in a keeper league where we start 2DE, 2LB, 2DB and an extra defender. Every year I try to have at least one LB from your team. Had Woodley a couple years ago, Timmons last year and this year. I hate your team, but I respect the hell out of it.
Bird Law in this country isn't governed by reason.
by Tyler Jorgensen on Aug 9, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm so over your shit, dude.
I’ve been reading your posts, and you just don’t get it.
On top of everything, your little comments you throw in: “Doesn’t excuse the terrible pass either.”
As it turns out, that pass was EXACTLY like so many successful passes just like it the Cardinals had converted over the previous two seasons. LeBeau game-planned for that pass, saw it coming, diagrammed and planned a defensive play for it that called for Harrison dropping back, “hiding” behind the line and popping out for the INT. Watch it. Over and over like I have. Listen to them describe the play. THEY KNEW. So screw your “bad pass” bullcrap. Good defense. Good defense. Good defense. Repeat that over and over, turd. That’s what that was.
I’m so over Seahawks fans. I am so over them. What tools. I’m sorry everybody, I just can’t stand them. This has made their fans just about overtake Bungles fans to me. There’s more moisture hitting the ground up in the Pacific Northwest from whiny Seahawks fans than there is coming from the clouds, and that’s saying something.
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. Please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com for more info. Thanks!
That's actually incorrect
I have friends that are Redskins fans, Ravens fans (go figure), Eagles fans, and Cowboy fans. All of them think SB XL was well-officiated, as does Mike Pereira.
I love being the most-hated guy here. I love beating them while [their fans] are flicking me off. --Hines Ward
that's incorrect
Pereira thought the game was officiated poorly HOWEVER he said calls were missed that would have helped both teams…and he felt the steelers outplayed the seahawks and deserved the win more
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/ref-taking-super-mistakes-too-hard
This has always been a tough thing for Seahawks fans.
First: Only a small percentage of fans are unbiased and knowledgeable enough to really see a game objectively when their team is playing.
Second:It was a really close and hard-fought game, which magnified the close calls.
There were a lot of good calls, and some marginal calls that look questionable to the average fan, but are completely understandable. The thing that made this SB stink nationally was that unbiased fans also thought the Seahawks got jobbed. I think that most of the calls people have a problem with were actually acceptable calls, but had something that was close enough to nit-pick at a part of it.
The pushoff by D-Jack absolutely happened. It happened in a very minor fashion, during hand-fighting where either player could have been called, but the clearest fault was the final arm extension by Jackson. Normally a no-call, but by rule a call that can be accepted by an unbiased party.
The fumble that the Steelers recovered, but could not be reviewed looked like a fumble to me, and is the one big play that did go the Seahawks way, that our fans do not ever think about.
The Ben play was close, and normally would be accepted by unbiased fans. But the ref was signaling no-TD and then signaled TD. Not one ref overruling another, but the same referee. That made it difficult to accept, because the play looked inconclusive. To be honest, I saw pictures afterward of his initial push that looked in, but the official’s blunder after that play was not easy to take when it was too inconclusive to overturn, and is what the average fan had a problem with on such a close play.
The problem I had with the hold on Locklear was the jump by Haggan on the play. The play before it, and that play, I thought was was off-sides. The first one he jumped before the ball was snapped, but I wasn’t sure if he was over the line. The second one he was clearly across, and the flag came out so fast I was sure that it was for the off-sides. Then they huddled together and came out with a hold. That’s when I really had a problem with a call.
And of course, the Hasselbeck tackle. A clear bad call that is obvious to anyone, but tough to understand how officials can get together, discuss it, and still call that one. A play that regular defenders make all the time.
So by my own unofficial count, just two(three) missed calls, which is a normal or better officiated game, while the Steelers had a call missed that should have gone their way. But the Seahawks had so many more close calls, and things they couldn’t control. D-Jack getting one foot in-bounds on the goal line. Losing Hamlin early in the year, then losing his backup in the SB, so having the third safety in. Etric Pruitt, never a starter in the NFL before or since, playing a significant role on the Willie Parker run, and the Randal El pass, two huge plays. A lot for fans of Seattle to take that was out of the team’s control.
The truth is, both defenses played very well, Seattle’s offense was more consistent and gained more yards, while the Steelers made the biggest plays. Two of the big plays were the fault of a third string safety. At least one was a bad call by a ref(Locklear’s “hold” on a player who was allowed a jump that looked like off-sides), another two touchdowns went the Steelers way on borderline calls that could have gone either way (offensive PI, and Ben on the goal line).
Contrary to popular belief, on the average play, Seattle was making the play and the Steelers were not. It was not a game where the Steelers were beating up Seattle and their fans think the refs took away their 2 or 3 chances to win. Seattle’s defense did a ridiculously good job against a very good Steelers offense, with a few big plays where it broke down. But with long drives being neutered by big plays just barely not being made partly due to borderline calls, it put tons of leverage on plays that featured referees, and naturally made a lot of people feel like it was a horrible refereeing job. It was not, but all of that consternation needed an outlet.
I agree, the Seahawks got jobbed.
Seriously, this is well written and has much accuracy and wisdom. Should be required reading in the debate.
Just don’t forget…
The ref apologized; Can’t sleep at night; Regret til grave. = Hawks Jobbed.
by Great Sergios Ghost on Aug 11, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions
and when that ref's boss says he was right in making the holding call & wrong about apologizing?
might change the answer to the formula a lil






























