Hartwig + Pouncey > Pouncey + Essex/Foster?
Okay, bear with me. I haven't thought this one through enough to try to make a convincing argument one way or another. But a notion has continued to creep into my mind this past week with all the glowing remarks about Pittsburgh Steelers rookie Maurkice Pouncey. The general consensus is that Pouncey should be named the team's starting center in place of incumbent Justin Hartwig. There has been mumbling about Hartwig potentially be able (and certainly willing if called upon) to slide over to right guard, but frankly, having not spent much (if any at all) time at the position this offseason, is it really realistic to expect Hartwig to be able to make the transition to RG with this little time before the Steelers' home opener against the Atlanta Falcons?
I don't think it's realistic. So what then?
Some have mentioned the possibility of flat out cutting Hartwig rather than keeping him around as a reserve. Perhaps that's what will transpire in the forthcoming days.
But would starting Pouncey at center and cutting Hartwig be in the best interest of the Steelers? More specifically, does that make the most sense in 2010? It's not exactly like Pittsburgh is 'rebuilding' this year despite the fact that they'll be without their franchise quarterback for (likely) one quarter of the season.
So, my question is this - might it make more sense to start Justin Hartwig at center, at least to start the year, while starting Maurkice Pouncey at right guard, rather than starting Pouncey at center and either Trai Essex, Ramon Foster or some other unproven youngster at right guard (Kraig Urbik, Doug Legursky)?
We saw how poorly Essex played on Sunday night against the Denver Broncos. Essex wasn't horrible last year, but he was far from great, and in fact, probably closer to below average. Yes, Ramon Foster played fairly well in place of the injured Chris Kemoeatu, but he has a grand total of four NFL starts to his resume.
I've never been an offensive lineman, never coached offensive linemen, and to be quite honest, am not exactly sure how exactly an offensive line unit works together. More specifically, I don't know how, say, a right guard works in tandem with the center on his left, and how a dominant guard can make an average center look better than he is individually.
What I'm getting at, in case you haven't figured it out by now, is that I'm wondering if Pouncey might be able to elevate Hartwig's game in a way that makes the interior of our offensive line better than expected. Pouncey may do just fine at center, but for as limited as Hartwig may be, I question if any of our younger options at guard are likely to fare much better at RG than Hartwig would at center.
We all know Hartwig's days are numbered in the Steel City. He almost assuredly won't be returning in 2011 (if there's football) to be the team's center. It will be Pouncey's show by then. But we've still got Hartwig for 2010. And though it may be tempting to upgrade the center position immediately, not to mention begin the Pouncey era at center in Pittsburgh sooner rather than later, it may not make the most sense when you look at the entire offensive line as a whole.
Thoughts?
44 comments
|
Add comment
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pouncey should be Center
Here’s why: The Center is the most important position on the offensive line.
For years, the Steelers were a running team that could always be counted on the get the third and short. What was the one constant during that time? A stud at center.
From 1964 to 2006 the Steelers had exactly four centers: Ray Mansfield, Mike Webster and Dermontti Dawson, and Jeff Hartings. All of them were perennial Pro Bowl starters.
For the past several years we have been struggling with a journeyman as Center. Oh.. and the line has sucked. Coincidence? I don’t think so.
The Center is an extremely important position, and one that the Steelers have taken for granted for far too long. I’m delighted to see Pouncey getting a shot at the job. The kid seems really special. Mark my words, the line is going to start dramatically improving this year.
For once, I agree with Markjoel
The offensive line has been missing a stud of any kind since Faneca left and if center is Pouncey’s best position, you have to play him there. Every unit needs a stud. Look at how great the Steelers’ secondary looks with Troy in there and how horrific it looks when he’s out.
Anyway, Hartwig was manhandled too many times by the opposing team’s nosetackle last season and with more teams switching to a 3-4 defense, you need an all-world center to combat that. I believe Pouncey is the closest to a sure thing that we’ve had here in a first round pick in a very long time. You go with Pouncey at center. If you want to try Hartwig at guard, fine, but I believe his best football is way behind him.
by Anthony Defeo on Sep 2, 2010 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions
he should be center because
he outplayed Hartwig and the line played better with him at Center for the most part.
From all reports Essex has looked the best at RG from practice. I don’t want it to be so but I’m willing to admit it may be the situation. Having Essex there does give the right side of the line more Steeler playbook experience. He can help both guys next to him. He’s also supposedly pretty bright.
I kind of wonder in hindsight if we might have been best putting Flozell at RG with Scott at RT. If Flozell is a bulldozer who gets beat by speed rushers, he sounds a bit like a guard to me.
Also slight nitpick here: Hartings made 2 pro bowls, Mansfield none
by Steely McSmash on Sep 2, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I've considered this same question
With no conclusion, as I don’t know which position was worse last year between C and RG. I think that Hartwig and Trai Essex are both vulnerable, and will be vulnerable regardless of where Pouncey starts. My money is on center, so that there can be some continuity between the changing positions of C and RT. If only Willie Colon hadn’t gone down, the picture would be much more rosy.
I think the best bet is Pouncey/Foster, accept the poor pass protection, and focus on run blocking.
by prophicide on Sep 2, 2010 12:10 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Pouncey+Foster>Hartwig+Pouncey
You bring up a thought provoking point. However, Pouncey needs to start at center for multiple reasons:
1) He is the best center on the Steelers roster… by a huge margin. His natural position is center and while he did play some guard at Florida… he excels at center and is not as dominant at the guard position.
2) He is the best offensive lineman suited to handle a dominant nose tackle like Ngata.
3) The center often helps double team pass rushers… something Hartwig just doesn’t have the lateral movement for, the foot work, the arm strength or even the leverage positioning. Foster has been average at best… but he is 7 years younger and about 20 pounds heavier.
4) Hartwig has never played guard for the Steelers and if he’s questionable at his own position… to see him start out of position would make any Steeler fan cringe.
5) I believe something that doesn’t get talked about a lot in this forum was Hartwig’s inability to call out the pass rushing & defense schemes fast enough or accurately. This directly effects the blocking pick-ups by our lineman and often why there is a guy flying into the backfield untouched. Pouncey is smarter and will do a much better job at calling out the defensive alignments/schemes this year.
+1 Then we draft the OTHER Pouncey next year to be our starting RG
BOOOYAH!
This sentence should take up no more than 1 line.
by SteelerMessican on Sep 2, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions
pulling... I like what you did there
"You know how football is - if your mother's on the other team and you're coming out to play football, you're gonna hit momma" --L.C. Greenwood
Funny
I just had this arguement with a friend. Agree with Mussier Bean on this one. If we start Pouncy at center and get rid of Hartwig our right guard is the week link. We know Jeff can (barely) hold his own, but he can. We start Pouncy at right guard and the front line, as a whole, is better.
I'm one of the few Hartwig supporters here
and I am sure that Hartwig is a better Center and Guard than Essex will/could ever be. The question is whether or not Hartwig could ever fill in at guard on such short notice and I just don’t have the answer to that. But my opinion is that I would rather give Hartwig a chance at Guard rather than just cut him lose.
I'm inclined to agree with your argument...
And it’s also something I’ve spent time considering.
I think, physically, there is no question that Pouncey is dominant compared to Hartwig, even as a rookie who will take his lumps.
However, Steelers73 made the fair point that Hartwig may actually NOT be superior to Pouncey in the mental aspect of the game; which is sad, because Center is a hard offensive position to learn, and you’d think ANY veteran, no matter how lousy, would be better than a rookie.
I say we start whichever one calls the blocking assignments better. And while I don’t like Hartwig as a center long term, and agree that in the future, MP should play his natural position, having Hartwig man center this year, and giving Pouncey a year to adjust before handing him the reins makes sense.
That, and has the line has been lousy, veteran depth seems to be a bad thing to cut at this point, even if it’s veteran depth that was never great to begin with.
We should have drafted another premiere interior lineman two or three years ago…
"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will
wikipedia shouldn't be used as a source, but...
…hartwig wiki. an interesting quote from there:
Hartwig won starting center job with four preseason starts after never playing center prior to training camp.
so maybe he won’t be so upset with pouncey taking over. he’s already signed, and we don’t really have a backup C, so why not just keep him as #2 C? no real downside. i was worried hartwig would sulk as backup, but he did the same thing to someone else.
i was trying to find out the last time hartwig played tackle (which is why i turned to wikipedia since i couldn’t find anything anywhere else). turns out it was in college. so my thought to move him to tackle won’t work.
hartwig’s had no time at G, so that ain’t gonna work.
we just gave hartwig a contract, so keep him on the team, he’s #2 C, and he’ll like it!
Pouncey looks much better at Center than he does at Guard. I don’t know if anyone else noticed that, but he disappears at RG and is just solid, one of those you don’t talk about him and it’s good, but at Center he is noticeably impacting the line for the better.
Hartwig may be better at Center than Essex at RG, but even if he is, it isn’t enough to offset Pouncey’s awesomeness at Center over his adeptness at RG.
I’d love to see Urbik, Foster, anyone beat Essex out, I’ll take anyone getting better than the person in front of them, it helps the team. But Pouncey isn’t the answer at RG. He’s a much better Center than Guard.
by Phantaskippy on Sep 2, 2010 3:11 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Thoughts
Legursky can play C as well as G, Hartwig is a C only, regardless of his few starts at G. He is perennially outmatched at his position. Pouncey in the middle is what has to work in the AFC North. He has already gone up against Cheeseburger Fat Cody in college, didn’t he also face Gerald McCoy?
Getting rid of Hartwig frees also up 2 mil and a roster spot for a young player. I think we need to go young at LB, we have a lot of potential on the table right now.
When You Look Upon Us
And You See This BLACK & GOLD
You Shall Fear Us
For We Will Best You,
As We Are The PITTSBURGH STEELERS
And We Are Legendary
Book of Chachi
4:12
as much as i love our young LB talent
They aren’t going to contribute to a SB run really this year, except on ST. And the $2 mil is chump change in an uncapped year for the Rooneys. Especially for a veteran like Hartwig who’s busted his balls and been a consummate professional for the franchise this past two years – not to mention helped win a SB. Tunch Ilkin, on an interview here on BTSC in ’08, said that Hartwig was the guy who had impressed him the most with his play.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
Tunch Ilkin, on an interview here on BTSC in ’08, said that Hartwig was the guy who had impressed him the most with his play.
This is interesting to me. However, I wonder if asked now what he would say.
When You Look Upon Us
And You See This BLACK & GOLD
You Shall Fear Us
For We Will Best You,
As We Are The PITTSBURGH STEELERS
And We Are Legendary
Book of Chachi
4:12
I'd like to see Hartwig w/ Pouncey
I can’t bring any more knowledge of o-line here, but I would like to see Hartwig at least get a shot at C with two decent G’s next to him. He has at times been the most consistent o-lineman for us, (maybe not last season). And he was such an upgrade over Mahan…. I’d rather see him than Essex or Foster start…
For me then, the big question is whether Pouncey is in fact already as good or better than Hartwig at recognizing what assignments to call out, etc…. Somehow I doubt this, as all we see in pre-season are basic packages, and as awesome as Pouncey obviously is, he is a rookie. But that is perhaps my bias…
Flozell
He’s the one who kills this. He needs an experienced RG next to him to help him with the new scheme, new side, etc. Essex is valuable because he makes Flozell better, even though Essex himself is a turnstile at RG.
I think this is one of the reasons why they are reluctant to put Pouncey there or a younger player like Foster or Urbik. And once you do start Pouncey, you need experienced guards on either side of him to help with his calls. He’s smart, but still a rook.
If Colon was healthy, it would change everything and you could see an open competition at C and RG. But once he went down, it was almost certain that Essex would keep his job at least to start the season.
I’m waiting for next year: Colon comes back healthy and is pushed by Chris Scott and Tony Hills, Essex gets pushed by Scott, Foster, Urbik, Legursky… we could actually be heading in the right direction here.
going with Pouncey Hartwig Flozell on the right side
sandwiching Hartwig between the rookie and the new guy to our system, sorta seems ideal, doesn’t it? Hartwig becomes the o-line version of Batch(only actually gets to play)and can mentor Pouncey while helping Adams get acclimated. No one has wowed at RG, not that the position is glamorous, but can Hartwig be that much worse than what we’ve tried? He’s been calling the line shifts for years, so I have to expect he knows the majority of what the other guys have been doing all those plays. It helps us now, and will give Pouncey added support leading into the future.
"I wore my purple camo to the practice, but they wouldn’t let me into the autograph zone. No clue why."- Mr MaLoR
by kick him in the head on Sep 2, 2010 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions
i don't think it is
Hartwig hasn’t played guard in forever and barely at that. I doubt he’s even in the discussion at RG. And I’m honestly not sure he’s actually an upgrade over Essex, he was getting tossed around by Denver backups.
Also, knowing the line calls is one thing but helping a Tackle out after never substantively playing Guard seems like it could be stretch. I’m no line expert on this point though, so i see where you’re coming from.
by syrsteelerfan on Sep 2, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions
denver backup
may be decent. Since they have Jamal Williams now, I think their backup NT is the guy who played the 2009 season.
by Steely McSmash on Sep 2, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Hartwig
There’s really no reason to cut Hartwig. Keep the best 9 guys. I say: Adams, Essex, Pouncey, Kemo, Starks, Foster, Urbik, Hartwig, and either Hills/Scott. I think Hills is slightly better than Scott, but the other 8 guys are definitely the best we have. I think Urbik over Legursky could be debated, but I think we’ve seen Legursky’s ceiling and Urbik may have more upside. As far as starting, I say Foster>Essex, but I say Essex starts on gameday.
interesting about Urbik over the big Legursky. I like Legursky’s versatility, But I might not like it so much if Maurkice goes down and he is starting at center…
by Steel_curtain76 on Sep 2, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions
keep the best 9.
I like you’re list, but I’d keep Legursky over Hartwig since he can play center and guard. Let’s face it, Hartwig was average at best so why keep a $2M backup center who doesn’t even play special teams?
Adams – Essex/Urbik/Foster – Pouncey – Kemo – Starks with Hills and Legursky as reserves.
I still would hope the RG spot is still up for debate. Essex really doesn’t impress me.
Tomlin won't start Pouncey at guard
With Adams being new, they will want someone with experience in the system to help him learn the system. I doubt they would start two new players on the offensive line side by side.
With Essex already starting at guard, Pouncey could start and get help from Essex and Kemo.
cut hartwig...
…take the 2 million bucks and split it in half between Skippy and Woodley.
jk. I’m on the “Start Pouncey at center” bandwagon because he has proved himself to be far better than Hartwig there. Hartwig will not be happy, and he is due to make 2M unless cut, and they need roster spots, for, say, young LBs to (please god) improve the kick coverage. Hartwig will be cut fo sho.
I'm thinking that is more and more likely
Plus, he mailed it in against second teamers on Sunday.
"Successful destination is the pinnacle, make no mistake, but the fun is in the journey." - Tim Gleason
by chewiesteeler on Sep 2, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Cut Hartwig
He ranked near the bottom of the league at center position the last two years and I’m tired of seeing him get eaten alive by the likes of Ngata. Paying $2M for him to solely backup Pouncey when we have Legursky and Urbik who also took snaps at center seems silly. If it were Hartings at the end of his career and not Hartwig then I’d agree. Truthfully the only good I’ve seen from Hartwig is that he wasn’t Mahan. Unfortunately Legursky or Urbik would be an upgrade over Mahan also. Hell you could find upgrades from Mahan by picking up any random center after the cut day – he was that terrible.
The capacity to help the Gs
…means Pouncey gets the nod. He does not need that much help from his guards, except from an experience standpoint. He does, however, have huge upside in his assistance skills.
I raised this same question a while back in a comment, and initially thought the OL would be better off with the kid at RG for a year, than at C, where it creates a Hartwig problem any way you look at it. But looking at Maurkice’s strength in assisting the guards from his C position, evidenced in his start, and his overall superiority over Hartwig in the mental, physical and speed aspects, all this spells goodbye for Justin.
I’d rather live with a slight dropoff in RG play if it means a substantial increase in C play, than settle for same old at C, with only slightly improved RG play.
And I’d never go for the three position upheaval some are discussing here. We could then kiss our playoff dreams goodbye.
"I am a sinner who does not expect forgiveness, but [Thank God] I am not a government official" Francis Wolcott in "Deadwood", Season 2
by Flying Polamalus on Sep 2, 2010 11:31 AM EDT reply actions
Have to go with Pouncey
He’s done what first rounders are picked to do, but (at least in Pittsburgh) often fail to achieve; create an immediate upgrade on the team. Pouncey is the first to actually do that since Heath Miller. Hartwig’s problem is size (not as bad as Mahan, but bad enough) that doesn’t get any better if he switches to guard. Though you are right to suggest this alternative because he would still probably be better than Essex at the position, just not good enough.
I also think he has earned the righ, at this stage of his career to request the next step; remain as a valuable backup or be given the opportunity to play somewhere else.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Sep 2, 2010 11:52 AM EDT reply actions
Don't underrate Foster
What bothers me about discussions like these is the lack of mention of Foster. Yes, I know the guy was an undrafted FA. But he played well in 4 games last year and he’s been solid this preseason. When he plays, he’s effective. Now we don’t get to see the practices and the coaches have Essex in front of Foster, but I often wonder why. I’d like to see him get a real shot at the starting job.
Either way, I want Pouncey at the Center position. He’s just more effective than Hartwig. We often have to scheme to cover Hartwig’s lack of push and the running game suffers for it. I think it’s easier to scheme for a weak guard than a weak center.
Blitz, don't penalize Pouncey for Hartwig's shortcomings ...
I must admit, I didn’t think Pouncey would be this GOOD this quickly. He’s a natural center. I haven’t seen those jailbreaks coming through the middle with him playing center and I even saw him get movement on NT Jamal Williams more than a few times against Denver. If the kid’s got it, then turn him loose and let him play. I think the Steelers finally have a future All-Pro stud that they can build around on the line.
I think Hartwig is more part of the problem than he is the solution. I believe $2M is a lot of money for the Rooney family for someone who doesn’t fit in the team’s long range plans and have declining skills on top of that. Along with Pouncey, Legursky and Urbik can also play center. I’m more interested in if Urbik will beat out Jonathon Scott or R. Foster for that last OL spot.
I also think the Steelers need to keep 9 LBs and 10 DBs this year. I just think that Sly Sylvester and C. Butler could be starters in two years and very good players at that. With Timmons and Sly together, you have 2 three-down LBs on the field at all times (K. Fox could have something to say about that as well). It’s comical hearing beat writers talk about the team keeping LB Patrick Bailey because he’s so great on special teams. I’ve never seen him make a tackle in the base defense during all three preseason games nor has he made a tackle on special teams. He was also such a beast this past year on teams that the team gave up 4 TD’s. Please. Keep the youngsters at LB and let them learn from the studs.
I don’t think you can cut CB C. Butler, especially since K. Lewis might end up being a head case and both Ike and Gay will be free agents at the end of the year. Glad the final cut is Saturday so we can get this stuff behind us. Right now, I’m learning toward keeping Tank Summers over J. Dwyer just because Dwyer hasn’t shown that he can do anything else but run the ball. This last game could decide the final 4 to 5 roster spots tonight.
For those of us who are not in the Pittsburgh area, someone please post a link to view this game online as soon as possible tonight. I will be watching from my laptop. The NFL Network won’t show this game until 8 p.m. on Saturday night.
I was thinking of this this morning. I think in math.
Last year; Starks 5, Kemo 4, Hartwig 1, Essex 2, Colon 3 = 15 / 5 = 3 Ave.
This year; Starks 5, Kemo 4, Pouncey 6, Essex 2, Adams 3 = 20 / 5 = 4 Ave. That’s 1/3rd better with only one change. Heck Starks and or Kemo should have improved at least 1/2 and Adams will as the season goes along.
Once Adams “gets it” on the right side, put in Foster who may already be a 3 which would be a 40% increase in the OL. I’ll take it.
(I’m not grading these guys here, just and example.)
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
saddest thing about your grades
is that a rookie is our best lineman, and I don’t think it’s as close as you put it. He’s at least 2 or 3 points above any other.
I hope that Foster gets some playing time this week. It would make me feel much better if he managed to beat out Essex for the opener.
Adams I think will get better at RT and should be able to at least match Colon’s performance (which I never thought was as good as some). That’s not saying Adams will be great, but I don’t think we’ll be objectively looking at his performance come season end and think it was a downgrade from Colon.
Starks – he’s Starks. He’ll never be horrid, never great. He’ll have some good games and others where he mimics a traffic cone.
Kemo – love that run blocking, shake my head at how stupid he is in pass protection. After this many years you have to have some kind of brain damage to still make as many mental mistakes as he does.
Essex – filling a spot. Not a good Guard at all and currently the obvious weak link. Should be replaced by one of the backups if they show even a faint pulse.
Pouncey is currently the only member of the line that looks like he will be a pro bowler at his position. A vast upgrade at center over Hartwig who was one of the league’s worst centers the past two years.
I hate advertising...
Here’s a hypothetical we don’t want to think about: Game against the Ravens, just before BR returns, Pouncey breaks a leg stomping Ray Lewis’s head into the turf and is out for the rest of the regular season.
We would want Hartwig on the roster at that point.
Even if nothing bad happens, football is a rough game, and there’s a lot of risk to cut your previous starter for such a knowledge-heavy position in favor of a rookie (Even one as exceptional as MP looks to be)
Sorry to doubt, but cutting JH sounds like a not-great idea. Also, the Rooney’s are billionaires…they don’t trip on a couple million the way 99% of us do.
"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by 





















