The Best 2010 NFL Defense: A Deeper Statistical Analysis Than Yards Per Game, Part 2
One of the fallacies that bugs me in the NFL is the definition of the top offense and defense in the NFL. Generally, the majority of NFL fans and analysts go by yards per game. Defensively speaking, if your team gives up the least yards per game you are crowned the best defense in the league. It gives a simplistic view of offense and defense, but it is incredibly inaccurate and completely ignores millions of dependent variables like time of possession, points, yards per play, etc. Therefore, I decided I wanted to take a deeper look into NFL defenses and find the best one based on more than just yards per game. I will try to take into account those many dependent variables, but remember this is not perfect science (what is really?). This is just one man's statistical review of the issue. I guarantee you though, it is a better representation of a defense as a whole than yards per game.
In case you missed it, see Part 1 here.
All of my numbers have been collected from Pro-Football-Reference (and a few other sources listed elsewhere).
Moving forward, there is more to defenses than just yards allowed. A good defense can get after the QB and pile up sacks and turnovers. Several categories I think that quantify a good defense would be sacks, QB pressures (stat from ProFootballFocus premium membership), turnovers forced, and touchdowns given up on defense. For the purpose of being consistent and fair, I will do percentages rather than total numbers (i.e. a team that sees more pass plays is more likely to get more sacks). Therefore, the Sk% column would be the percentage of sacks the defense gets per opponent drop back.
| Team | TD | TD% | TD% Rk | TOs | TO% | TO% Rk | Sk | Sk% | Sk% Rk | QB Pr | QB Pr Rk |
| Bears | 28 | 2.8 | 6 | 35 | 3.49 | 4 | 34 | 5.5 | 21 | 149 | 23 |
| Steelers | 20 | 2.0 | 1 | 35 | 3.59 | 3 | 48 | 7.5 | 6 | 197 | 4 |
| Saints | 26 | 2.7 | 5 | 25 | 2.64 | 18 | 33 | 6.3 | 12 | 144 | 25 |
| Packers | 22 | 2.3 | 2 | 32 | 3.3 | 6 | 47 | 8.2 | 3 | 173 | 15 |
| Panthers | 39 | 3.7 | 20 | 29 | 2.74 | 13 | 31 | 5.6 | 19 | 155 | 19 |
| Chargers | 32 | 3.4 | 14 | 23 | 2.45 | 21 | 47 | 8.8 | 2 | 150 | 22 |
| Rams | 28 | 2.8 | 7 | 26 | 2.56 | 20 | 43 | 7 | 8 | 183 | 10 |
| Titans | 30 | 2.6 | 3 | 25 | 2.19 | 24 | 40 | 6 | 15 | 182 | 11 |
| Ravens | 27 | 2.7 | 4 | 27 | 2.68 | 16 | 27 | 4.3 | 32 | 155 | 20 |
| Chiefs | 34 | 3.3 | 10 | 23 | 2.24 | 23 | 39 | 6.3 | 11 | 196 | 5 |
| Redskins | 38 | 3.6 | 19 | 27 | 2.57 | 19 | 29 | 4.8 | 29 | 153 | 21 |
| Cardinals | 41 | 3.8 | 22 | 30 | 2.75 | 12 | 33 | 5.8 | 17 | 120 | 31 |
| Patriots | 35 | 3.3 | 11 | 38 | 3.6 | 2 | 36 | 5.6 | 18 | 184 | 9 |
| Colts | 36 | 3.6 | 20 | 21 | 2.08 | 26 | 30 | 5.3 | 24 | 160 | 17 |
| Falcons | 32 | 3.3 | 12 | 31 | 3.24 | 7 | 31 | 5.2 | 25 | 189 | 8 |
| Bengals | 36 | 3.8 | 23 | 26 | 2.72 | 14 | 27 | 5 | 27 | 126 | 29 |
| Lions | 41 | 4.1 | 24 | 29 | 2.89 | 10 | 44 | 7.8 | 5 | 174 | 14 |
| Dolphins | 30 | 3 | 8 | 19 | 1.92 | 29 | 39 | 7.2 | 7 | 149 | 24 |
| Buccaneers | 35 | 3.5 | 15 | 28 | 2.83 | 11 | 26 | 4.8 | 30 | 123 | 30 |
| Giants | 35 | 3.6 | 17 | 39 | 4 | 1 | 46 | 7.9 | 4 | 158 | 18 |
| Jets | 35 | 3.6 | 16 | 30 | 3.06 | 9 | 40 | 7 | 9 | 137 | 27 |
| 49ers | 34 | 3.3 | 13 | 22 | 2.13 | 25 | 36 | 6.1 | 13 | 206 | 3 |
| Vikings | 35 | 3.6 | 18 | 26 | 2.66 | 17 | 31 | 5.5 | 20 | 195 | 6 |
| Browns | 33 | 3.2 | 9 | 28 | 2.69 | 15 | 29 | 5.4 | 22 | 162 | 16 |
| Broncos | 52 | 4.9 | 30 | 18 | 1.7 | 32 | 23 | 4.4 | 31 | 113 | 32 |
| Seahawks | 44 | 4.1 | 25 | 22 | 2.05 | 27 | 37 | 5.9 | 16 | 218 | 1 |
| Jaguars | 47 | 5 | 32 | 18 | 1.9 | 30 | 26 | 4.9 | 28 | 131 | 28 |
| Eagles | 43 | 4.3 | 26 | 34 | 3.41 | 5 | 39 | 6.8 | 10 | 211 | 2 |
| Bills | 46 | 4.3 | 28 | 22 | 2.05 | 28 | 27 | 5.4 | 23 | 137 | 26 |
| Texans | 49 | 4.9 | 31 | 18 | 1.78 | 31 | 30 | 5.2 | 26 | 180 | 12 |
| Cowboys | 44 | 4.5 | 29 | 30 | 3.07 | 8 | 35 | 6.1 | 14 | 189 | 7 |
| Raiders | 43 | 4.3 | 27 | 24 | 2.42 | 22 | 47 | 9.1 | 1 | 175 | 13 |
| Avg Team | 36 | 3.6 | -- | 26.9 | 2.66 | -- | 35.3 | 6.1 | -- | 164.8 | -- |
It is interesting to see how bad the Ravens pass rush is, because I was not expecting that with the type of year Terrell Suggs is having. The Steelers, on the other hand, remain green in everyone of their rankings so far. Their lowest ranking being the pass yards per game (12th). In these four rankings, the Steelers again have the best average ranking of 3.75. They are followed by the Packers at 7, the Patriots at 10.5, the Giants at 11.75, and the Rams at 11.25. In dead last again, is the Broncos with an average rank of 30.
At this point, I think we can separate out a few teams into the final discussion. I think the teams still left in the debate would be the Steelers, Chargers, Ravens, Jets, Bears, and Packers. You could slide in the Patriots, Giants, and Eagles if you would like, but I do not think their defenses are well-rounded enough.
Finally, since the Steelers pass defense was the biggest "concern" (at least according to pass yards per game, let's break into the pass numbers even more. Let's take a look at QB Rating, AY/A, NY/A, and ANY/A. I explained what these numbers meant in a previous stat post, but in case you missed it let me explain. AY/A is Adjsuted Yards per Attempt, which adjusts Y/A by adding weight for touchdowns and taking away for interceptions. The equation is (Pass Yards + 20 * TDs - 45 * INTs) / Attempts, where the 20 and -45 are constants determined by a ton of statistical analysis. NY/A is Net Yards Gained per Pass Attempt, which adjusts the number based on yards lost by sacks. The equation is (Passing Yards - Sack Yards) / (Pass Attempts + Sacks). Lastly, ANY/A, or Adjusted Net Yards Gained per Pass Attempt, is just a combination of the two. I like these numbers better for ranking a defense because it combines several statistics into one category, which are easier to use.
| Team | QB Rate | QB Rate Rk | AY/A | AY/A Rk | NY/A | NY/A Rk | ANY/A | ANY/A Rk |
| Packers | 67.2 | 1 | 5.1 | 1 | 5.4 | 3 | 4.1 | 1 |
| Steelers | 73.1 | 2 | 5.2 | 2 | 5.3 | 1 | 4.3 | 2 |
| Bears | 74.4 | 3 | 5.4 | 3 | 5.8 | 6 | 4.7 | 4 |
| Chargers | 76.2 | 4 | 5.7 | 4 | 5.3 | 2 | 4.6 | 3 |
| Ravens | 76.4 | 5 | 5.7 | 5 | 5.8 | 7 | 5.1 | 5 |
| Jets | 77.1 | 6 | 6.4 | 16 | 5.6 | 4 | 5.5 | 13 |
| Buccaneers | 77.6 | 7 | 5.7 | 6 | 5.9 | 10 | 5.2 | 6 |
| Chiefs | 78.1 | 8 | 6.2 | 11 | 5.7 | 5 | 5.4 | 9 |
| Rams | 80.4 | 9 | 6.4 | 13 | 5.8 | 8 | 5.5 | 14 |
| Giants | 80.7 | 10 | 6.4 | 15 | 5.8 | 9 | 5.4 | 10 |
| Eagles | 80.8 | 11 | 6.2 | 10 | 6 | 13 | 5.3 | 8 |
| Panthers | 81 | 12 | 6.1 | 9 | 6.1 | 16 | 5.4 | 11 |
| Patriots | 81.2 | 13 | 6.1 | 8 | 6.4 | 23 | 5.4 | 12 |
| Falcons | 82.2 | 14 | 5.9 | 7 | 6.1 | 15 | 5.2 | 7 |
| Saints | 83.2 | 15 | 6.5 | 17 | 5.9 | 11 | 5.6 | 15 |
| Cardinals | 83.5 | 16 | 6.7 | 20 | 6.5 | 26 | 5.9 | 21 |
| Browns | 84.8 | 17 | 6.7 | 19 | 6.6 | 27 | 6 | 23 |
| Dolphins | 85 | 18 | 7 | 24 | 6.2 | 21 | 6.1 | 25 |
| Bengals | 85.2 | 19 | 6.5 | 18 | 6.4 | 24 | 5.9 | 20 |
| Raiders | 85.6 | 20 | 7.1 | 26 | 5.9 | 12 | 5.9 | 18 |
| Titans | 86.4 | 21 | 6.4 | 14 | 6.1 | 17 | 5.6 | 16 |
| Vikings | 86.4 | 22 | 6.4 | 12 | 6 | 14 | 5.7 | 17 |
| Lions | 89.2 | 23 | 7 | 23 | 6.2 | 20 | 5.9 | 19 |
| Redskins | 89.6 | 24 | 7.3 | 28 | 6.9 | 29 | 6.6 | 29 |
| Seahawks | 89.7 | 25 | 7.4 | 29 | 6.4 | 25 | 6.5 | 28 |
| 49ers | 90 | 26 | 6.8 | 21 | 6.3 | 22 | 6 | 22 |
| Colts | 91.7 | 27 | 6.8 | 22 | 6.1 | 18 | 6.1 | 24 |
| Bills | 92.6 | 28 | 7 | 25 | 6.1 | 19 | 6.3 | 26 |
| Cowboys | 92.8 | 29 | 7.2 | 27 | 6.8 | 28 | 6.4 | 27 |
| Broncos | 93 | 30 | 8 | 30 | 7.2 | 30 | 7.3 | 30 |
| Jaguars | 98.5 | 31 | 8.2 | 31 | 7.5 | 32 | 7.5 | 32 |
| Texans | 100.5 | 32 | 8.4 | 32 | 7.4 | 31 | 7.5 | 31 |
| Avg Team | 82.2 | -- | 6.5 | -- |
6.2 | -- |
5.7 | -- |
This post is getting rather long, so I won't harp too much on this table. These numbers do a good job debunking the Steelers having a bad pass defense. Call it hiding a two bad corners with a solid pass rush if you want, but it is still damn good. The Steelers are committed to maintaining a solid pass rush, as they displayed in the 2010 NFL draft. It should be interesting to see the effort they put into signing Ike Taylor vs. LaMarr Woodley, two very important players to this defense.
Since all of these categories are pretty similar, I averaged them for the final table to prevent them from having an overpowering weight in the final ranking (P Stats Rk). Also, since I mentioned yards per game were worthless, I removed them from the rankings all together. I kept all of the categories I believe quantify a good defense.
| Team | Pts/G Rk | P Y/A Rk | R Y/A Rk | TD% Rk | TO% Rk | Sk% Rk | QB Pr Rk | P Stats Rk | Rk Avg |
| Steelers | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 1.75 | 2.31 |
| Packers | 2 | 6 | 28 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 15 | 1.5 | 7.94 |
| Bears | 4 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 21 | 23 | 4 | 9.38 |
| Chargers | 10 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 21 | 2 | 22 | 3.25 | 10.03 |
| Jets | 6 | 5 | 3 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 27 | 9.75 | 10.59 |
| Ravens | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 16 | 32 | 20 | 5.5 | 11.31 |
| Giants | 17 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 11 | 11.5 |
| Chiefs | 11 | 7 | 18 | 10 | 23 | 11 | 5 | 8.25 | 11.66 |
| Patriots | 8 | 22 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 18 | 9 | 14 | 12.13 |
| Rams | 12 | 12 | 22 | 7 | 20 | 8 | 10 | 11 | 12.75 |
| Eagles | 21 | 18 | 15 | 26 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 10.5 | 13.44 |
| Titans | 15 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 24 | 15 | 11 | 17 | 13.5 |
| Saints | 7 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 18 | 12 | 25 | 14.5 | 13.69 |
| Falcons | 5 | 17 | 25 | 12 | 7 | 25 | 8 | 10.75 | 13.72 |
| Vikings | 18 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 16.25 | 14.16 |
| 49ers | 16 | 23 | 2 | 13 | 25 | 13 | 3 | 22.75 | 14.72 |
| Dolphins | 13 | 19 | 4 | 8 | 29 | 7 | 24 | 22 | 15.75 |
| Panthers | 26 | 14 | 10 | 21 | 13 | 19 | 19 | 12 | 16.75 |
| Browns | 14 | 25 | 12 | 9 | 15 | 22 | 16 | 21.5 | 16.81 |
| Buccaneers | 9 | 4 | 29 | 15 | 11 | 30 | 30 | 7.25 | 16.91 |
| Lions | 19 | 26 | 23 | 24 | 10 | 5 | 14 | 21.25 | 17.78 |
| Raiders | 20 | 20 | 24 | 27 | 22 | 1 | 13 | 19 | 18.25 |
| Seahawks | 25 | 24 | 16 | 25 | 27 | 16 | 1 | 26.75 | 20.09 |
| Cowboys | 31 | 29 | 19 | 29 | 8 | 14 | 7 | 27.75 | 20.59 |
| Colts | 23 | 13 | 27 | 20 | 26 | 24 | 17 | 22.75 | 21.59 |
| Bengals | 24 | 21 | 20 | 23 | 14 | 27 | 29 | 20.25 | 22.28 |
| Cardinals | 30 | 27 | 21 | 22 | 12 | 17 | 31 | 20.75 | 22.59 |
| Redskins | 22 | 28 | 26 | 19 | 19 | 29 | 21 | 27.5 | 23.94 |
| Texans | 29 | 31 | 11 | 31 | 31 | 26 | 12 | 31.5 | 25.31 |
| Bills | 28 | 16 | 32 | 28 | 28 | 23 | 26 | 24.5 | 25.69 |
| Jaguars | 27 | 32 | 30 | 32 | 30 | 28 | 28 | 31.5 | 29.81 |
| Broncos | 32 | 30 | 31 | 30 | 32 | 31 | 32 | 30 | 31 |
It is no surprise to me that the Steelers come out far and away the best defense of 2010 in this analysis. It should not be a surprise to anyone who watched them play this year. On the field you could see the tenacity of the defense that is categorized by these numbers. In all of the categories I selected the Steelers finished in the top 6, whereas the other top defenses had at least one category that fell at or below average.
31 comments
|
Add comment
|
8 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Job!! Thanks for this!
REC’d. Thanks JS. The javascript tables and colored cells are a great help! Well done!
thanks for
making these easy enough for us laymen to understand
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Jan 25, 2011 9:27 AM EST reply actions
Once again, fascinating info -
and great picture choices – the Troy Hug and the Karate Kids are two of my very favorite D pics from this season!
"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin
by Rebecca Rollett on Jan 25, 2011 10:40 AM EST reply actions
the karate kids worried me
I think you can get flagged for “group celebrations”. Hopefully someone lets the D know not to join in on each other’s sack dances.
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 25, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions
good job
Nice to see others that love numbers as much as I do
"I solemnly swear to tell the truth as I know it, the whole truth as I believe it to be, and nothing but what I think you need to know."
One more stat
Knockouts caused by our players lead the league methinks…
Fear factor would a cool measurement. Our teams capable of making an opposing qb crap his pants
Recd for a fine poast great work there dude
Great post
very easily understood and interesting as well. two great defenses heading into this superbowl. Things have changed for green bay after giving up 50 something points last year to arizona in the playoffs
In Myron we Trust
by SteelTownKid08 on Jan 25, 2011 12:19 PM EST reply actions
Oh wow
This will be one great SB.
Excellent posts. I enjoyed them both.
I knew we had a great defence but I did not appreciate how great.
So when do we get to see an analysis of the offences? :-)
"I don't mind being a symbol but I don't want to become a monument. There are monuments all over the Parliament Buildings and I've seen what the pigeons do to them."
"Canada is like an old cow. The West feeds it. Ontario and Quebec milk it. And you can well imagine what it's doing in the Maritimes."
Tommy Douglas
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Jan 25, 2011 12:38 PM EST reply actions
errors?
Love the post.
Couple things I noticed screwing around with the numbers here and maybe you have a typo or two in there.
TD% Rank according to the % you calculated, the bears should be #1 and the raiders #32.
I was poking around at doing the rankings in an analog way by normalizing your % figures and then linearly scaling the numbers so they go from 1-32. This gives you an analog rank so to speak. People doing mathematical operations on rankings always bugs me because the differences between the ranks is highly variable. My method still gives you a 1-32 ranking but you don’t lose the details in the data.
Here are the analog rankings for TD %
Team Normal TD Rank
Bears 1
Steelers 1.815789474
Saints 2.631578947
Packers 5.894736842
Avg Team 10.78947368
Panthers 10.78947368
Chargers 11.60526316
Rams 11.60526316
Titans 11.60526316
Ravens 11.60526316
Chiefs 14.05263158
Redskins 14.05263158
Patriots 14.86842105
Cardinals 14.86842105
Falcons 14.86842105
Colts 14.86842105
Bengals 14.86842105
Lions 17.31578947
Dolphins 17.31578947
Buccaneers 17.31578947
Giants 18.13157895
Jets 18.13157895
49ers 18.13157895
Vikings 19.76315789
Browns 23.02631579
Broncos 23.84210526
Seahawks 24.65789474
Jaguars 26.28947368
Eagles 28.73684211
Bills 29.55263158
Texans 30.36842105
Cowboys 31.18421053
Raiders 32
How do you figure the Bears should be #1?
Steelers:
TDs yielded: 21
Plays: 1010
Bears:
TDs yielded: 28
Plays: 1002
Steelers: 20/1010*100= 2.1%
Bears: 28/1002*100 = 2.8%
by John Stephens on Jan 25, 2011 1:20 PM EST up reply actions
Also, I thought about doing the data skewed in that way, but decided against it in the end. I figured it made the analysis a little too complex for the average reader. I do agree that it makes things a bit more accurate though.
by John Stephens on Jan 25, 2011 1:40 PM EST up reply actions
Awesome post
Thanks for the detailed breakdown that confirms via stats what we all saw with our eyes. This Steelers D is playing lights out football. Given the mirror image of the defense with the Packers this should be an amazing superbowl.
There is some nice colors in that post
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Llyod, Andy Russel, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene and Jerry Kramer
"Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King Jr.
Canal Street Chronicles resident Steelers Fan
Just for kicks..
I’d wager that opponents of Pittsburgh drop far more passes too since our defense tends to instantly swarm to potential targets.
Just ask Cotchery, Hoosh or Boldin.
Didn't read the post
But that picture is awesome!
I like baseball, movies, good clothes, whiskey, fast cars... and you. What else you need to know?
by NoCal-SteelCity on Jan 25, 2011 2:48 PM EST reply actions
Love that picture.
Pow Right In The Kisser!
by Cutch is the chosen one! on Jan 25, 2011 4:35 PM EST reply actions
ooh
thanks!
and a bit better understanding of the Packers defense from this too. Timely!
I loves me the data!
An interesting follow on to this analysis is how the strengths (and weaknesses) of the two defenses match up against the offenses. One key to this game is the Packer’s run defense or lack there of. They gave up an average of 4.7 yards per rush! That kinda sucks. The Steelers want to run and if they can run on the Jets, the Packers may be looking at a long day.
by Burghboyinoaktown on Jan 25, 2011 8:09 PM EST reply actions
Cooling down Rodgers
Excellent post. Thanks for all the great data. I envy your table making.
I was not surprised that the Steelers D is number one, but I was surprised at how good the Packers D is. The chart also shows, however, how good the Bears D is. I believe the Bears defense, more than the weather or the turf, is why Aaron Rodgers performed poorly on Sunday after near-perfect outings against the inferior Eagles and Falcons defenses. The Packers offense was able to score only 14 points against the Bears, and that was with consistently short fields due to the ineptness of the Bears offense. If the Steelers can shut down Rodgers and the Pack as effectively as the Bears did, the Steelers should easily win the game.
Facts are stubborn things
Gerela's Gorillas are here for the show
and so is Franco's Army
It's been many years in coming
just watch that Steeler machinery humming!
by GoldMetalDefense on Jan 25, 2011 9:05 PM EST reply actions
Full quote
“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. "
-John Adams
Rec’d!
Gerela's Gorillas are here for the show
and so is Franco's Army
It's been many years in coming
just watch that Steeler machinery humming!
by GoldMetalDefense on Jan 25, 2011 9:06 PM EST reply actions
Excellent
I just joined here and I wanted to say that it was a pleasure reading your analysis. It was an outstanding job on your part!! Extremely informative!
by Black&GoldTrain on Jan 26, 2011 3:41 AM EST reply actions
Thank you
and welcome to BTSC. If yous tick around you will see a tn of good analysis by all of our users.
by John Stephens on Jan 26, 2011 7:13 AM EST up reply actions
Your welcome
I have read the articles on here and I really like them. I also like the good conversations that Steeler fans have on here and even if people disagree with each other they do it in a respectful way which is really refreshing compared to other sites around. Also fans from other teams don’t come on here just to cause trouble. I’m definitely sticking around and I look forward to more articles from you and everyone else. GO STEELERS!!! However, we have to do something about you being a Caps fans. lol jk.
by Black&GoldTrain on Jan 26, 2011 11:38 PM EST reply actions
My favorite post on either BTSC or ROTB (I’m from Arizona).
I’d love to see analysis of the past 5 years, or perhaps 10 years.
I once did it just for total yards allowed for the past 10 years and came to the conclusion that the Ravens and Steelers were pretty close. Be interesting to see these analyses applied over a greater period of time.
Tom Coniam
Devoted Fan of Arizona Cardinals and ASU Sun Devils
But also a general Arizona sports fan
Maintainer of the "Protect The Nest" Facebook community.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Protect-the-Nest/157471224301129
I started working on it. 2001-2010
I am not going into the same detail you did, but I did PA. YA, Sack, and Int (raw numbers, not as percentages of drop backs)
Speaking of which, why did you leave out interceptions?
I need to weigh out PA/YA greater than Sacks/Ints.. because as currently shown the Steelers are 2nd even though they were #1 from in PA YA and Sacks.
Let’s see if this will paste in…
PA Rank YA Rank Sack Rank Int Rank Avg Rank
Baltimore Ravens 2 2 3 1 2
Pittsburgh Steelers 1 1 1 12 3.75
Green Bay Packers 8 7 6 2 5.75
Philadephia Eagles 5 6 5 10 6.5
New England Patriots 3 12 10 3 7
Miami Dolphins 10 5 2 19 9
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 4 3 24 5 9
Chicago Bears 6 15 13 3 9.25
Carolina Panthers 12 11 8 9 10
New York Jets 7 8 20 20 13.75
San Diego Chargers 13 17 4 21 13.75
New York Giants 16 10 7 25 14.5
Dallas Cowboys 15 4 17 23 14.75
Jacksonville Jaguars 9 13 25 18 16.25
Minnesota Vikings 22 19 19 6 16.5
Tennessee Titans 23 21 14 11 17.25
San Francisco 49ers 24 22 16 8 17.5
Atlanta Falcons 18 29 12 16 18.75
Indianapolis Colts 14 16 23 24 19.25
Cleveland Browns 17 26 28 7 19.5
Washington Redskins 11 9 31 28 19.75
St Louis Rams 31 23 11 15 20
Seattle Seahawks 19 28 9 27 20.75
Denver Broncos 20 14 22 29 21.25
Cincinnati Bengals 25 20 27 14 21.5
Buffalo Bills 21 18 21 30 22.5
New Orleans Saints 27 24 18 22 22.75
Oakland Raiders 28 25 15 26 23.5
Kansas City Chiefs 26 31 30 13 25
Arizona Cardinals 30 27 29 17 25.75
Detroit Lions 32 32 26 31 30.25
Houston Texans 29 30 32 32 30.75
Tom Coniam
Devoted Fan of Arizona Cardinals and ASU Sun Devils
But also a general Arizona sports fan
Maintainer of the "Protect The Nest" Facebook community.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Protect-the-Nest/157471224301129
Bravo, John
First of all, I’d have to say I definitely have “table envy.”. Those are gorgeous and really allow even a causual reader to grasp the general tendencies. I printed this post out on a color printer to enjoy them in all their glory.
Very well done and very well presented. Thanks for putting in the work.
by Chileburger on Jan 28, 2011 7:27 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I went ahead and posted what I had so far…
http://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2011/1/28/1960695/defensive-rankings-for-the-past-decade-2001-2010
Tom Coniam
Devoted Fan of Arizona Cardinals and ASU Sun Devils
But also a general Arizona sports fan
Maintainer of the "Protect The Nest" Facebook community.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Protect-the-Nest/157471224301129

by 



















