Steelers Offense Not To Blame For Jets' Furious Second Half Comeback
Howdy Steeler Nation. Hope your weeks got off to a nice start. I wanted to address some interesting and pertinent questions asked by you all on Monday about the Pittsburgh Steelers struggles in the second half of Sunday's AFC Championship Game win over the New York Jets. More than one of you either asked or stated something along these lines: yes, the Steelers played an outstanding first half of football, and yes the performance of the offense was a sight to behold, but what happened in the second half? Why couldn't the Steelers muster the same type of offensive success against the Jets in half number two? And why did Bruce Arians get too conservative in the final 30 minutes rather than going for the jugular when he could?
Well, let's first get on the same page: I agree, the second half was somewhat disappointing. And the Steelers coaches and players will tell you the same thing. Multiple guys said as much in their post-game interviews Sunday night.
Okay, now that we agree that the Steelers could have done a better job closing out the game in the third quarter when they had the chance to, let's reexamine what happened on Sunday night after intermission.
Before we do that though, let's all get on the same page about one of the most basic human instincts -- when you're feeling comfortable, you can get complacent in a hurry; and conversely, when you know you're threatened or in danger, an incredible survival instinct kicks in. I'd agree that this survival instinct is even more powerful when, you know, your actual life is on the line, not just a ball game. That said, I I'm of the opinion that one of the more fascinating aspects of sports and competition is the ability for the losing team or individual to respond in a hurry when their backs are unequivocally against the wall.
Hopefully we're not in disagreement on that front, though perhaps you see it a bit different. Anyway, clearly the Jets were in full on desperation mode in the second half. What about the Steelers though? Did they totally take their foot off the gas? Let's take a look at their second half drive charts against the Jets.
| Start Time | Time of Possession | Drive Began | Plays | Yards Gained | Result |
| 12:13 | 4:31 | 28 | 8 | 35 | Interception |
| 6:44 | 5:54 | 30 | 9 | 13 | Punt |
| 7:44 | 0:06 | 1 | 1 | -1 | Safety |
| 3:06 | 3:54 | 41 | 8 | 27 | End of Game |
Okay, a quick over view of the chart. Obviously the end result left plenty to be desired, and anytime you gain just 73 yards in a half you're never too satisfied. Still, leaving aside the zero points and total yards gained, there's one key stat in that table that helps explain why the Steelers were able to stave off the Jets at Heinz Field and advance on to their eighth Super Bowl appearance in franchise history. That stat would be time of possession. We'll get back to that shortly.
After the Steelers had taken a 24-0 lead late in the second quarter, they all of a sudden found themselves up just two scores with roughly 12 1/2 minutes to play in the third quarter following a quick two and a half minute TD drive by the Jets Credit the Jets for hanging a quick seven on the Steelers and getting the early score they needed to believe they could pull off the comeback.
However, the Steelers responded with an important drive on the ensuing possession, their first offensive series of the half. You might be asking, 'how can he say that drive was huge??? It ended in a turnover and no points?'
Both true, but that's okay considering the Steelers milked 4:31 off the clock. When the Jets got the ball back following Brodney Pool's interception of Ben Roethlisberger, they had the ball inside their own 15 yard line with roughly 7:45 left in the third. It would have been nice to bury the Jets right then and there, but that first offensive series reinforced my belief that there was no way New York was coming back to win. Sure they came close, but 21 points is too much to overcome when your opponent is milking so much time off the clock even on their 'unsuccessful' drives. The Steelers defense proceeded to force a quick three-and-out and Steeler Nation suddenly breathed a sigh of relief. On the Steelers next offensive possession, they put New York even further behind the eight ball with their 9 play drive that again didn't result in punts, but once more drained precious clock.
Did the Steelers get too conservative on that drive? Not if you ask me. Here was the series.
| 1st and 10 at PIT 28 | B.Roethlisberger scrambles right tackle to PIT 32 for 4 yards (M.Devito). | ||
| 2nd and 6 at PIT 32 | R.Mendenhall left guard to PIT 36 for 4 yards (S.Pouha). | ||
| 3rd and 2 at PIT 36 | (Shotgun) B.Roethlisberger pass incomplete short right to A.Brown. | ||
| 4th and 2 at PIT 36 | (Punt formation) J.Kapinos punts 40 yards to NYJ 24, Center-G.Warren, downed by PIT-R.Mundy. PENALTY on NYJ-J.Westerman, Roughing the Kicker, 15 yards, enforced at PIT 36 - No Play. | ||
| 1st and 10 at NYJ 49 | R.Mendenhall up the middle to NYJ 46 for 3 yards (M.Devito). | ||
| 2nd and 7 at NYJ 46 | R.Mendenhall right guard to NYJ 45 for 1 yard (B.Pool, B.Scott). | ||
| 3rd and 6 at NYJ 45 | (Shotgun) B.Roethlisberger pass short middle to M.Moore to NYJ 36 for 9 yards (A.Cromartie). | ||
| 1st and 10 at NYJ 36 | B.Roethlisberger FUMBLES (Aborted) at NYJ 36, and recovers at NYJ 37. B.Roethlisberger to NYJ 37 for no gain (S.Pouha). | ||
| 2nd and 11 at NYJ 37 | (Shotgun) B.Roethlisberger pass deep left intended for E.Sanders INTERCEPTED by B.Pool at NYJ 5. B.Pool pushed ob at NYJ 14 for 9 yards (H.Ward). |
Sufficiently aggressive if you ask me. A nice mix of runs and throws.
Back to the critical time of possession numbers achieved by the Steelers second half drives. Little did I realize that that the average NFL drive lasts less than 3:00. The Steelers had two drives to start the half that were substantially longer than that. And those drives came with them holding a comfortable lead. Good stuff. Interestingly enough, the Steelers second offensive series of the half took up even longer than the first -- almost six minutes worth of game clock in fact. Yet somehow the offense only advanced the ball a total of 13 yards by the time they were forced to punt it away. How'd that happen? Here's a reminder....
| 1st and 10 at PIT 30 | R.Mendenhall up the middle to PIT 30 for no gain (M.Devito, D.Harris). | ||
| 2nd and 10 at PIT 30 | R.Mendenhall left tackle to PIT 36 for 6 yards (B.Pool). | ||
| 3rd and 4 at PIT 36 | (Shotgun) B.Roethlisberger scrambles left guard to PIT 41 for 5 yards (S.Ellis, D.Harris). | ||
| 1st and 10 at PIT 41 | R.Mendenhall up the middle to PIT 40 for -1 yards (M.Devito). | ||
| 2nd and 11 at PIT 40 | R.Mendenhall right end to PIT 48 for 8 yards (E.Smith). | ||
| 3rd and 3 at PIT 48 | (Shotgun) B.Roethlisberger scrambles left end to NYJ 47 for 5 yards (B.Pool). PENALTY on NYJ-A.Cromartie, Defensive Holding, 5 yards, enforced at NYJ 47. | ||
| 1st and 10 at NYJ 42 | B.Roethlisberger sacked at NYJ 49 for -7 yards (C.Pace). | ||
| 2nd and 17 at NYJ 49 | (Shotgun) M.Moore right guard to PIT 48 for -3 yards (D.Harris). | ||
| 3rd and 20 at PIT 48 | (Shotgun) B.Roethlisberger sacked at PIT 43 for -5 yards (T.Pryce). | ||
| 4th and 25 at PIT 43 | (Punt formation) J.Kapinos punts 38 yards to NYJ 19, Center-G.Warren, fair catch by J.Cotchery. |
Why abandon the run if it's still working? Thankfully Roethlisberger was able to move the chains by converting consecutive third downs with his feet, but notice that both were four yards or fewer. Translation: the rushing plays on first and second downs were setting up manageable third down attempts, so why stray at that moment?
So after that punt, the third quarter was just about over. What I think most are forgetting is that the Jets' ensuing drive lasted over eight minutes before they were stuffed at the goal line by the Steelers defense. A fantastic drive by the Jets, but one that ultimately took up too much time considering it started at the NYJ 42.
A muffed center-quarterback exchange following the goal line stand gave the ball back to the Steelers at their own 1 yard line. Safety. Do you blame that mishap on poor offensive play calling and/or execution? Obviously the execution was off, but it didn't help that Doug Legursky was seeing his first snaps all year at center. Regardless, the ball goes back to the Jets. In my mind, the Steelers have still just had two offensive series in the half. And both played a role in helping secure the win.
Then on their final drive after the Jets narrowed the lead to five with their second touchdown of the half, the Steelers executed perfectly and iced the game with a perfect blend of rushing and passing plays. I don't need to remind you what happened on that sequence. I will though quickly I guess. A first down pass to Heath Miller on second down -- a situation where everyone though the Steelers would run. Then a third down conversion a few minutes later when they could have taken the conservative 'hope not to lose' approach. Nope. They played to win and did just that.
Look, it wasn't a great half of football on either side. But it was mostly a few shortcomings by the defense coupled with a great half by the Jets once they had entered full-on desperation and survival mode. The offense? Not really to blame one bit if you ask me.
34 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
On point as usual Mike
I reckon I could’nt see the trees for the forrest. All I saw was one more TD and it’s over. Didn’t even realize they were eating up the clock. I guess BA was right, chew up yards and the clock, gets some points. If one doesn’t work the other will. Great post Mike.
"It's a dog eat dog world and I'm wear'in milkbone underwear" - Norm
im with you
It was frustrating at the time, I just thought that the rushing plays were successful enough (like the first half) to warrant going back to them time consistently. Thanks for the read.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Jan 26, 2011 1:46 AM EST up reply actions
I sorta agree
I think we ran so much it was too predictable. I would have liked more Redman and Moore who both had great touch(es) and never get any more which is so annoying.
However I think at that point the quick passing game was open with short slants possibly being money. A screen or two as well. And the deep ball was open but Ben couldn’t deliver.
To me you run to set up the pass and I think we got up so fast we didn’t want to pass when it was available.
Agreed
I couldn’t agree more. Nice post. I was a little surprised at some of the reaction towards BA on his second half strategy in some of the other posts, although I should be used to it by now. The safety killed us. Take that out and things would have been alot different, I believe.
But your analysis with the stats reinforces my belief even more. BA takes too much flack. The Steelers are heading to Dallas, tough to argue with that. And in my opinion, anyone who says it’s despite of BA needs to take a closer look at the stats and game summary.
So thanks for that.
Craig H. Leslie
by Heinz57steelerfan on Jan 26, 2011 2:24 AM EST reply actions
Well. . .
The safety I don’t blame on them, that’s the price of a goal line stand, it’s why you go for it on fourth down, your confident in your defense with the opposing center standing in the endzone.
The interception, that’s on the offense. Not the playcalling, but on the offense.
The Jets gave us all they could, it wasn’t enough. That’s what I saw. Both our offense and defense were designed to run the clock, and they did. For comparison:
The Bears had 8 drives in the second half vs. the Packers. The Jets had four. They needed to get 24 points on four drives. They got 16, two touchdowns and a safety that their offense earned.
The defense and offense that stress us and drive us crazy is the reason teams don’t come back on us, and why we generally have the ball last. With a 24 point lead the clock is your friend, milk it. The second TD didn’t matter, the one to Toine hurt because it was a big play, but that was a clutch play taking advantage of a fall. Didn’t happen again.
Word
Thanks. This is the piece I have been wanting to read since the game ended Sunday. Great breakdown.
I did not realize the run was so effective in the 3rd Q. I probably remember the end of the second drive more clearly than the other runs that were good.
I also need to give more credit to Ben for his play in the 2nd half than I have been giving him. When the 3rd down plays broke down, he picked up crucial first downs on the ground.
No 3 and outs, with that kind of a lead? Huge for the Steelers. Offense was fine (not great) in the 2nd half.
Not to be a debby downer but...
We should have had a 3 and out. The only reason we didn’t was that Kapinos is left footed so he was able to get the punt off and have the Jets player take out his leg.
Granted the play happened so no need to play what if games. But the offense did nothing to “deserve” that first down.
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 26, 2011 1:07 PM EST up reply actions
you're right
That is likely why most people were thinking that the Steelers O was just completely awful, we got saved big time on that punt.
down with “what ifs”
Time of Possession
Michael, thanks as always for that detailed breakdown. I agree with you, while you clearly want/need points when you hold on to the ball, the Steelers milking time off the clock in the second half was just as key as scoring more points would have been.
And while everyone likes to focus on the Steelers miscues in the second half, what about the penalty on the punt? That allowed the Steelers to burn even more time off the the clock. Arguably, that penalty could have cost New York the game.
In grading the Steelers performance against the Jets I too credited the coaching staff.
Given how much trouble Ben had consistently throwing the ball, and this began in the first half if everyone will remember, I thought Arians did a great job of mixing the calls.
I cringed before the last play when I heard Phil Simms saying, “I expect the Steelers to run it here and take more time off of the clock” because there is no way I thought it would work. But the Steelers didn’t go the conservative, safe route. And the players delivered.
Final thought. My (Argentine) wife knows little of American football, but her reaction to the second half ran along the lines of “it wasn’t as if PIttsburgh played badly, but that the Jets picked it up.” Slightly over simplistic, yes, and I don’t excuse the Steelers for taking their foot off of the gas, but I think that defnese the essential dynamic of the game.
Credit the Jets for not mailing it in — but also credit the Steelers for making the plays they needed to, even in the second half, to win. (For those interested, for a full Steelers AFC Championship “report card” click here).
by Hombre de Acero on Jan 26, 2011 6:01 AM EST reply actions
Thanks, Bean
I guess my reaction to that second drive colored my impressions of the entire second half, though when you only have really 3 drives, one drive is pretty important.
On that drive, I didn’t like BA’s playcalling. The end of that drive, with three successive negative plays, was big, and it let the Jets back in the game.
Unfortunately, Arians has become such a lightning rod that even mild criticism of his game plan tends to bring out the extremists on both sides.
On another thread, I tried to make these points:
- Overall, I think Bruce Arians has done a good job, though he sometimes makes incomprehensible decisions.
- In the first half last night, I thought he did an amazing job.
- Overall, in the second half last night, I didn’t think he did a good job.
- On the last possession, I thought he did a great job.
I don’t see anything extreme about the above position. Based on the closer look above, I might qualify point 3 a little more – it wasn’t as bad as I thought, but it wasn’t good. Too much four and five wide on both of those possessions. I put the pick on Ben – he threw it, but why were we in shotgun formation on 2nd and 11 up by two scores and needing to bleed the clock? When we only needed about five yards for a field goal? Odd call. And the three successive negative plays that ended the second drive? I don’t remember the first play of that last series of downs, the one that resulted in the BR sack, but since it was a sack, I’m thinking it was a pass play. Why? On second down, the draw call is another weird one. Draws work when the D is expecting you to pass. I can’t believe the Jets would really commit to a pass in that situation, so the draw is a low-percentage call. Then you’re forced to throw on third and long, which creates another opportunity for a negative play.
Like you, I don’t count the safety. And Arians had an excellent plan for that final series — major props to him for that. And I would not have called him out for calling pass plays in that situation even if they hadn’t worked — you play to win. But two out of three possessions in the second half (not counting the safety), some very bizarre playcalling hurt our cause.
Unfortunately, this has become such a polarizing debate that it’s hard to generate any discussion about it that doesn’t devolve into nastiness and flaming. Two bad series in a half don’t justify firing a guy, I’m not calling for a re-evaluation of the position, but I don’t think he called a good second half, though maybe it wasn’t as bad as I thought it was. I don’t think he’s the taxman, I wouldn’t ridicule his wife, but he also shouldn’t be immune to criticism just because some people are overly critical.
by cee_jay on Jan 26, 2011 9:41 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
The first play of the series with the three negative plays was a play action pass, which was exactly what I was hoping they would run before the snap. The Steelers had been running the ball all game, and it wasn’t unreasonable to think that play action would catch them overplaying the run and at a minimum pick a significant gain if not a touchdown. Credit to the Jets for defending it well.
Good points Mike BUT
being there at the game, it was quite unnerving to sit through. Jets fans were represented well there and you could feel the sense how uncomfortable the crowd was getting.I hate to bring up the Pats, but I think they know how to bury teams better. If we could have scored just one time in the second half it would have demoralized them and the comeback would have been over but we couldn’t do it and it almost came back to bite us.The defensive stand at the goalinewas HUGE. There was just a sense of relief when it was over. I stared at the stadium clock the entire 2nd half and it was just dragging.
The second half wasn't so bad
Here’s what I loved. You’ll hear some people crying over Dick Lebeau going soft which he’s done before. He let off the pressure and Sancholo had all day to throw.
But we did it I think for a reason. Let them burn clock. The Jets consumed 8 minutes and got nothing (now they’d get a safety right after but still). Thats a huge amount of time to not score points when you’re down a pile.
Plus on offense, even though we didnt score, we had two medium length drives that also consumed a fair amount of time.
Essentially it was a game of kill the clock and I feel we did that well. My only problem with the game was the pick ben threw rolling left which could have put a TD up easily and really sealed the game further.
this
My only problem with the game was the pick ben threw rolling left which could have put a TD up easily and really sealed the game further
Jets were only one splash play away from a 27-24 final score. And we’d be starting draft talks, instead of excitement about the SB. All the jets needed was one opportunistic fumble, interception, or something to bounce their way. It does not make for a comfortable half, when a team can get 19 points unanswered.
brought to you by Carl Jr's.
Yeah
Fortunately neither pick we had in the game was very critical.
The one off Mendy was the equivalent of getting stuffed at the line on 4th down anyway.
The other was so deep back there that it would end up causing the Jets to burn time anyway.
Fortunately our team made the opportunistic play by Ike and Gay earlier and the Jets couldn’t do that themselves.
Last week, when Ben threw the long pass to Antonio Brown,
he commented that the advantage of throwing a deep ball is that even if it gets picked it’s the same as a punt. That doesn’t take into account the possibility of the person who makes the pick running it back, although I presume that Ben also suggested to the guys that they be alert for that possibility. But this seems to be another instance of the ‘a pick is about the same as a punt" philosophy, with the added advantage that you aren’t actually asking a journeyman punter to pin the opposing team deep in their own territory – something that isn’t a gimme even for a top punter. You also aren’t giving the ball to somebody that specializes in YAC, either. Makes sense to me.
"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin
by Rebecca Rollett on Jan 26, 2011 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
As much as Ben is getting grief in some quarters for his stat line, his 1st half performance was pivotal in gaining 17 points on O and a 21 point lead. It’s like the opposite of a quarterback who puts up 2nd half numbers playing catchup. Fantasy owners may like the yards and garbage points, but without a win BFD. Does anyone think Ben was supposed to put up big passing numbers with that lead? Is anyone complaining about how they gained that sizeable and ultimately insurmountable lead? Grinding out 95 1st half rushing yards, bleeding the clock, taking the early life out of the Jets . . . championship football.
I wish Ben was just a little more accurate, because he had Sanders open on the 2nd pick and it likely would have iced the game (he had Wallace open on the bomb to Revis Island too). Otherwise, I can’t see much to complain about. Blame the Ravens for demonstrating a week earlier what not to do with a double digit halftime lead.
Ben rolling left usually isnt great
Its tough for him to roll left and chuck against his body. He rolls right its a TD rolls left it comes out weak.
I was hoping he’d just run with it and get some field position there and hopefully set up a FG
agreed
but I can’t complain about Ben’s decisiveness on tucking and running on this day. He often hesitates to run because he prefers to make plays with his arm, but considering how much the Jets focused on sticking with their coverages, there was plenty of space and he often capitlized. He should do that more often. It’s not like he cares about getting hit, and contrast with Sanchez, who beaked the refs about a defender grazing him on a slide (outstanding no-call btw).
The book on Ben says to contain him in the pocket and failing that to force him left. He scrambled right on the key 3rd down pass to Brown, which hints that the Jets were caught off guard on that play.
by chicos_pants on Jan 26, 2011 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
I'm curious if the cold was affecting Ben's strength and accuracy yesterday
This year Ben has been throwing great deep balls. (no pun intended) But on Sunday his deeps were a little weak. He underthrew Wallace and under threw sanders on that interception. I wonder if he was affected by either the cold or his hip which was hit early on causing him to have a hard time stepping through his throws.
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 26, 2011 1:12 PM EST up reply actions
Wondered the same thing about the cold
and I almost forgot about the hip shot he took. I think you will see a more effective passing out of Ben….and Rodgers…at the house of Jerry. I could see Ben doing well in a shootout then, but maybe not in the bitter cold.
But you keep pulling out your "refs-threw-the-game" card if that’s what you need for catharsis. You can use that card after every loss. It is a lifetime pass. Get it laminated. -Maryrose
Not to mention
that a catch is riskier, because I gather the ball feels like lead, and of course your hands are stiff.
"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin
by Rebecca Rollett on Jan 26, 2011 1:38 PM EST up reply actions
I'm going with the charlie horse he got affecting the long ball.
Everytime he had to plant hard to make the long throw it would hurt, which would affect the accuracy.
Short throw are all arm and can be made off your back foot.
I’m going to watch for that when I rewatch the game.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
Ben
Ben was a bit off. When leaves the pocket (either way) I always expect a big play. It was there and just a bad pass by Ben. Should have been 7, and game really over.
Regarding defense- Jets were comfortable taking 3 yards per play, so Lebeau let them. Don’t get burned and they will run out of time, which they did. On the drive that ended at the one. it took the SEVEN MINUTES to go from the the 30 to the 1! Incredible.
Running time off the clock is great but...
2nd and 11 on the Jets 37. If we just gain a few more yards, we can set up for a FG that would have put the game away. I’m not sure why Ben feels a need to throw a deep pass to a covered receiver there. Check down or try to run for a few yards. Plus, it’s only second down. Even an incomplete pass gives you another shot at gaining the yards needed for a field goal try.
yeah
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Jan 26, 2011 3:21 PM EST up reply actions
That would be interesting to me to see for sure.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
i wondered.
There’s always the fact that a Receiver should come back to the ball. Under cut the defense even.
Again it’s something Holmes and Hines do so well with Ben (or did in Holmes case) is adjusting and seeing the ball and work back to it.
by Chicago Steeler on Jan 26, 2011 7:58 PM EST up reply actions
Total Agreement
IMO, that was a great analysis of the 2nd half. I couldn’t agree more. Your analysis really demonstrates just how solidly Roethlisberger performed in the game. It also suggests that Bruce Arians might have actually called a rock solid game. (I can’t believe I just typed that.) The biggest play of the 2nd half was Ike Taylor slipping in coverage on Holmes. That was the “Waiting to Exhale” play that gave the Jets hope…but the mix of play calls and long drives by the Steelers sealed the Jets fate. Excellent job!
I think this ties in with what a lot of people were saying on The Taxman post, which is that Arians has made progress this year. Compare that second half performance with some of the offensive performances last year in the final quarter. Sustaining a couple of drives to eat about 10 minutes off of the clock was huge, as compared to those instances last season where the offense contributed just as much as the defense to late collapses by just disappearing late in games. I will say this though. I think the Steelers better take that 3 score lead (assuming that they can get it) into the middle of the 4th quarter before going at all into a prevent defense against the Packers. Rodgers is much better than Sanchez at this point and the Packers are more explosive offensively than the Jets.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Jan 26, 2011 7:18 PM EST reply actions

by 
































