NFL Trading Deadline: Steelers 2011-2012 Salary Cap Analysis
Well I finally got my act together, as you may guess from my other posts I am pretty detail oriented and a perfection analist {oops analyst} :) I can't stand when my data is off or when my tables look less than professional so I just had to get my tables right. I think that part is done and after finally completing this drawn-out task, I realized this Salary Cap Data is telling me a story I just had to share with Steeler Nation. Kevin Colbert and Omar Khan have painted an absolutely stunning portrait hidden in plain sight and if you follow the numbers you will see this truly is a Pollock-van Gogh-Picasso masterpiece. You can question the player personnel decisions or the team’s age BUT you can never say that they have managed the Salary Cap poorly. All teams that spent heavily in 2009 and 2010 had Salary Cap issues this year and there was nothing to do but make the best out of a bad situation. Make Lemonade from Lemons so to speak. It wasn't until the new CBA threw a monkey wrench in works that the Clubs with Salary Cap challenges began to realize that going from a projected $140mm Cap to an actual $120.4mm Cap would be no "walk in the park." Please take a closer look at the Cowboys Dead Money table and you are reminded of the timely and relevant Warren Buffet quote:
"Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked "
|
Dallas Cowboys 2011-2012 Big Dead Money Contracts |
|||||||
| Player | Signing Bonus | Signed | Years | Dead $ | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
| Roy Williams | $26,085,000 | 2009 | 5 | $13,200,000 | $4,400,000 | $8,800,000 | $0 |
| Leonard Davis | $16,000,000 | 2007 | 7 | $6,600,000 | $2,200,000 | $4,400,000 | $0 |
| Marion Barber | $12,000,000 | 2008 | 7 | $6,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $4,000,000 | $0 |
| Marc Columbo | $8,000,000 | 2009 | 7 | $5,400,000 | $1,800,000 | $3,600,000 | $0 |
| Total Dead $ | $31,200,000 | $10,400,000 | $20,800,000 | ||||
|
Pittsburgh Steelers 2011-2012 Dead Money Breakdown |
|||||||
| Player | Signing Bonus | Signed | Years | Dead $ | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
| Max Starks | $10,000,000 | 2008 | 5 | $4,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $2,000,000 | $0 |
| Antwaan Randle-El | $900,000 | 2010 | 3 | $600,000 | $300,000 | $300,000 | $0 |
| Limas Sweed | $1,560,000 | 2008 | 4 | $390,000 | $390,000 | $0 | $0 |
| Chris Scott | $140,000 | 2010 | 3 | $94,000 | $47,000 | $47,000 | $0 |
| Crezdon Butler | $119,000 | 2010 | 3 | $80,000 | $40,000 | $40,000 | $0 |
| Doug Worthington | $33,000 | 2010 | 3 | $22,000 | $11,000 | $11,000 | $0 |
| Total Dead $ | $5,186,000 | $2,788,000 | $2,398,000 | ||||
When you compare this table to the Steelers it is night and day, we only had $5.2mm total Dead money on the books vs. the Cowboys $31.2mm. It's quite ironic if you think about it, Jerry Jones is a high-risk, high reward type guy, he made his fortune in the oil exploration (i.e. drilling) business and as you probably know that is a boom-bust type industry, especially for oil drillers. Like being a wildcatter, going after big-time-high-priced FAs can be a huge win because not only might it help win a Lombardi but it puts asses in the seats! But just like a wildcatter drilling a dry well you can roll snake eyes 7X in a row and go straight to Salary Cap Jail!.
In the past, Jerry had good success with his high-risk style, remember Prime and the other star-studded Cowboy lineups chock full of "SB" Money? Think Aikman, Irvin and Emmitt. It worked wonders for a while until the Grim Cap Reaper paid a visit and forcefully threw Jerry into Salary Cap Jail. Funny how history repeats itself, right now Jerry is looking at an unbelievably bad Cap scenario, possibly even worse than the post-Aikman years. NOT only is there more Dead money than I have listed here but Jerry will certainly add to the $20.8mm listed here when he trims his 2012 Roster. Jerry is very likely to go over $30mm in Dead $ for 2012 which is about 25% of the total Cap. NOT GOOD! Please remember the Cowboys when you feel tempted to spout off on why we must get the next Nnamdi Asomugha or Megatron. This is the main reason why the Steelers do not chase big-time FAs or hand out massive Signing Bonuses ("SB"). Very prudent!
And what is the solution to this problem? Often gamblers like Jerry feel they must hand out more huge "SB"s because it's the only way to stay under the Cap and attract new stars while keeping the ones you have. Doesn't this sound a lot like throwing gas on a fire? Or going all-in on a busted straight you will lose your whole bankroll, it's just a matter of time! When the day of reckoning finally does come, the situation will be that much worse. Peruse the table below [ click on it to increase image size ] or [ Link to PDF Format ] and you can clearly see what I am talking about.
I recently wrote the Max Starks Contract Story [ Link to Max Starks Contract Story ] and how we signed him with only $750k Cap Space and at that time I was certain he could not be fit into a Qualifying Contract ("QC"). However, after re-reading the current CBA clause about 10 times I am still uncertain but believe there is an exception for players returning to their Old Club after being cut. Provided the contract was not re-negotiated or entered into in the year prior to the year the player was cut AND there were no terms (Minimum Vet Salary or more than $50k "AC") then the cut player may return to his old team under a "QC." (it's even more complicated because it depends upon the cut date but for Max the prior year would be 2010).
Now, if Max did in fact sign a "QC" on October 5th his maximum 2011 Salary Cap hit must be between $451k and $501k BUT the Steelers will pay him between $619,412 and $669,412. For more clarification, here is the math:
- Minimum Vet Salary = $810k for player with 7 "CS" > > mid season signing 13 of 17 weeks remaining >> Max earns $619,412 plus up to $50k "SB" = maximum "QC" earnings or $669,412.
- Cap Accounting = $525k Base Salary Cap Hit for all "QC"s times 13 of 17 weeks remaining = $401,470 BUT all Salary Cap numbers are rounded to nearest $1,000 so rounded Cap Hit is $401k. Now add maximum "AC" of $50k and you have $451,000 2011 Salary Cap Hit.
All "QC"s are only available to be signed for one year and cannot be renegotiated prior to the end of the season without losing the Salary Cap savings. Therefore, you cannot re-sign Max to a longer contract until after the season if you want to keep the Salary Cap savings of $168k on the books. Someone asked me about re-signing Max Starks now and I saw no problem with it, now based on the fact that a "QC" exists it is clear that we will not re-sign him (even if we actually wanted to) and lose that Cap savings even though it is only $168k. Also, from the table you can see that we have about $1.2mm in Salary Cap savings in 2011 by using "QC"s. While this is not a big number compared to the $120.4mm Cap it is a huge help when you are Salary Cap challenged like we are.
Now during the Max Starks homecoming rumors, Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk tweeted that Steelers had about $750k of Cap Space. Also, Steeler Depot later reported that $875k Cap Space was freed by extending Aaron Smith's Contract one year and $1.75mm of his current Salary was converted to "SB." This maneuver freed up $875k this year but also created potential Dead $ of $875k next year if this is his last year. And if all this information is correct and Max did sign a "QC" then after cutting Chris Scott an additional $1.4mm in Cap Space has been freed up and you can see below the new total is roughly $2.142mm.
This is very important as Tuesday's trading deadline approaches and that may be the reason the Aaron Smith restructuring occurred. After Sunday's games there are only 11 regular season weeks remaining so $2.14mm Cap Space would allow you to sign contracts with Base Salaries up to $3.31mm if there were no signing bonuses or other "AC."
The devil is in the details and you can see how inter-related a thing like Max Starks signing a "QC" truly is because it rules out certain moves while opening the door to others. In fact, we are now positioned to make a trade if we can find more O-Line help. There is quite a lot of flexibility if you think about it, you could bring in a 10 "CS" Vet, give him a 2 year contract for the $910k Vet minimum and a $3mm signing bonus and still be exactly $53k under the Cap. So you see, the details while boring are also very important.
I sorted the above table by Signing Bonus Remaining ("SBR") and highlighted yellow the largest amounts. Of these amounts, there are only three contracts, Ben, Deebo & Heath that are not newly signed contracts in 2011. Ben is expected to have large "SBR" and other Guaranteed Amounts ("GA") owed to him because if you don't pay him someone else will.
Now take a look at the neon green highlights which are the 9 year Vets with "SBR." Again see how well planned out this process is; the biggest potential Dead Money hit is $3.35mm form Brett Keisel if he is cut before June 1st, 2012 after June 1st the 2012 Cap Hit is only $1.675mm while the same amount gets pushed to 2013. So assuming Steelers make cuts after June 1st of 2012 which is standard NFL practice to avoid "Acceleration." Acceleration is the Cap accounting rule that calls for all "SB" and "GA" to be charged to the Cap immediately should a player leave your Roster prior to June 1st of any given league year. However, if you cut the player after June 1st then the Current Cap hit would be the "expected" pro-rata amount while the remaining "SBR" and "GA" amounts are pushed into the following year. This means that Casey Hampton with $2.17mm "SBR" would be the largest potential Dead Money Hit if he were cut after June 1st. Again this is peanuts compared to the Cowboys.
Because of the judicious use of "SB" Kevin Colbert and Omar Khan have positioned this team to get younger with no major landmines lurking below the surface. Even if they cut 10 of the top 20 players it would be extremely hard to get to the $20.8mm+ Dead Money hit Dallas faces next year.
Finally take a look at the turquoise blue highlighted numbers and you can determine for yourself who might be the best Cap casualties. There are any number of candidates and it will depend upon how they do this year but because the FO has planned this so well they are prepared for almost anything, including a Deebo injury-retirement. It wouldn't be pretty BUT it would be manageable, from every angle your FO has spread and hedged their bets in a judicious manner so that almost any scenario would be covered. That's a foundation of good management, diversifying your risk enough to protect from unexpected events without over-diversifying and becoming average. Bottom line, these guys are world-class Maestros like Leonard Bernstein, Arturo Toscanini and the present day Gustavo Dudamel. What beautiful music, if you listen closely these numbers are a symphony too.
The Steelers got off to a slow start this year with difficulty on the road while being magnificent at home. We probably should be 0-3 on the road because of our Turnover Troubles [ Link to Road Turnovers are Nuclear Tsunamis ] but we were able to squeak by with a 1-2 road record. When I look at the table below I see a strong relationship between our away winning % and our playoff performances. It will be interesting to see if this past correlation holds up later this year and through the playoffs. Every year that our away winning % has been 75% or better we were in the AFC Championship Game or went to the Super Bowl. That's how critical the road is because it is one of the best indicators how good a team truly is. Anyone can win at home.
|
. |
Pittsburgh Steelers Win-Loss Record 2001-2010 | ||||||
|
. |
Year | Home wins | Away wins | Total wins | Home winning % | Away winning % | Post Season |
|
. |
|||||||
|
. |
2001 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 87.5% | 75.0% | lost AFC Championship |
|
. |
2002 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 71.4% | 62.5% | lost Divisional |
|
. |
2003 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 50.0% | 25.0% | missed Playoffs |
|
. |
2004 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 100.0% | 87.5% | lost AFC Championship |
|
. |
2005 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 62.5% | 75.0% | won Super Bowl |
|
. |
2006 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 37.5% | missed Playoffs |
|
. |
2007 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 87.5% | 37.5% | lost Wild Card |
|
. |
2008 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 75.0% | 75.0% | won Super Bowl |
|
. |
2009 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 75.0% | 37.5% | missed Playoffs |
|
. |
2010 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 62.5% | 87.5% | lost Super Bowl |
|
. |
Average | 5.8 | 4.8 | 10.6 | 72.5% | 60.0% | |
If the Steelers can peak come playoff time there should be no reason they cannot make a Super Bowl run because the only team that looks really good are the Packers. Everyone, including the Steelers have their shortcomings and foibles and many teams also have had a terrible time on the road. Either way, Kevin and Omar have put this team in a position to win this year without mortgaging the future while maintaining flexibility to injuries, retirement and age. Bravo Maestros!
I know after looking at the big picture and seeing the complete picture it paints I am more than impressed. And if we can avoid road turnovers and peak at the right time who knows what is possible. At Heinz field the sane Dr. Jekyll reins but on the road that psychopath Mr. Hyde keeps showing up. Bottom line, whatever the results, Kevin Colbert and Omar Khan could not have done any better job under the circumstances, they truly are the Wizards of Chuck Noll Way!
Any cap questions or trade ideas?
50 comments
|
Add comment
|
9 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Keep It Up
Keep up the excellent work. Back when I still lived in the states buddies of mine used to think of me as the local Steelers Bar’s “Salary Cap” expert, and while I did know a fair amount back then, I only scratched the surface as to what you provide.
by Hombre de Acero on Oct 17, 2011 5:28 PM EDT reply actions
hay # guys
wtf
we are up 14 points
ok try too block a punt
Being intelligent does not make someone a dork
Give the man his props. Read it. Maybe you can learn from it. I appreciate his work and the time that I am sure it took to research this information. Keep up the good work k99. You are appreciated by many.
by Allen F on Oct 17, 2011 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i am just lucky to be in a position to do this kind of work and have the skills
otherwise i would be fired in a heartbeat for the time i spent on this shit:)
Brilliant article about a difficult subject
Great article about something no one thinks about.
My trade would be Hines Ward to a team in the NFC West. NOT because I don’t like Hines or think he can’t play anymore, but at this stage in his career and Mike Wallace needing to be signed I think he’s odd man out. Maybe someone wants a good field guy that can lead by example.
If you move him now you can maybe get something for him.. a bu O-lineman maybe? Next year he will be cut and you’ll get nothing in return. That div is so weak a person like Ward may be enough to get someone over the top. Esp AZ. C’mon the 49’ers leading that dead div?
I don’t think we have anyone anyone wants that you could hang out there. I think there’s going to be significant dead money after next years cuts. I love Arron but the injuries, same with Casey. Based on your chart they are several years under contract. Who is going to sign them to rehab?
I think the Steele’rs are going to be stockpiling bench players with the draft for the next several years with the hope they can play when called on. To get up in the teens and grab some better caliber players that you get late would help. But there’s only one way to do that.
dead $ won't be much even if harrison is cut
look, if every guy who is highlighted green above is not on the team after June 1st of 2012 the total dead money to add is only $8,176,667 which would be added to the $2.3mm current 2012 dead $. If you consider that we have $2.8mm dead $ this year and $5mm on IR then we would not be that much over.
THAT was the point of this story to show how much flexibility and long-term planning there is even with all these “older” vets and big contract signings.
kk99, I didn't see your chart the first time ...
Really great job. Definitely want to see the team start the youth movement next year.
by datruth4life2.0 on Oct 18, 2011 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions
you can open the chart in PDF and it is much easier to read and you can
maginify it and it is still clear, i am glad you find the information useful, had i realized there was interest in this crap i would have done it long ago.
kk99, great info to this site ...
I think you know more about the salary than a lot of so-called experts and we appreciate your digging. I think the Steelers will have a lot more dead money next year because a lot of veterans will need to go to keep this window open. I’d love to see an article for the most likely cuts next year. Call me crazy, but I think the Steelers should probably resign Max for two years and keep him at LT until they find someone better.
And the dead money that they created with Aaron Smith’s contract next year to sign Max this year is worth it.
by datruth4life2.0 on Oct 17, 2011 6:11 PM EDT reply actions
all the data is right here if you want to write a story on possible cuts.
there is only a total potential of $8.2mm dead money next year if you cut all the following players on or after June 2, 2012. You can even “designate” 2 of these players and have them count as June 2nd cuts even if you cut them earlier in the League Year starting March 1st.
So with the following players cut or retire after June 1st 2012, you add only $8.2mm to the $2.398mm 2012 dead money already on the books:
Brett Keisel
Ryan Clark
Casey Hampton
Hines Ward
Larry Foote
James Farrior
Aaron Smith
if you add Deebo in that is an additional $4.115mm. Again these figures are totally manageable.
i only said you could write a story
because i am not knowledgeable enough to write anything on specific players but the data here is pretty much showing that almost any player (other than deebo, ben and the new contract signings) could be released without a major dead $ hit.
that’s the brilliance of our FO.
Do we keep Kemo?
It seems the Steelers woud save 900,000 (cap total) if they cut him but then have a 3.3 million cap hit into 2013.
kemo's 2011 cap hit is $2.685mm but his 2012 Cap hit is $4.428mm
his remaining unamortized Signing Bonus (beyond 2011) is ~$3.37mm so if you cut him after June 1st of next year you free up $2.74mm net of dead $ ($4.428mm – $1.68mm). In other words you need to replace kemo with a player at $2.74mm or less for 2012 & 2013 in order for it to be cap neutral.
So you are right the dead $ kemo creates is ~ $3.37mm which if he is cut on or prior to June 1st his “SBR” is accelerated and the full $3.37mm hits the cap for 2012. After June 1st, 2012 half hits 2012 with the other half in 2013.
Because he has 6 Accrued Seasons there is zero Cap Space created by cutting him any time during this season not to mention you will add the full $3.37 dead $ liability for 2012.
If u ain’t rec’n this…. Ur cheatin ’
Awesome
by Steelchamps !! on Oct 17, 2011 8:06 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
I can’t rec cuz I’m mobile. Sumbody rec for me please.
by Steelchamps !! on Oct 17, 2011 8:08 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Dead money charge
Can kk99 cllarify whether a player who only has one year remaing with an unamortized SB be amortized over two years if they are cut after June 1st or because they are in the final year of thier contract must the entire amount be charged to that year whether they are cut after June 1st or not.
all signing bonus is amortized in straight-line accounting fashion
which means that when you sign a four year contract with a $4mm signing bonus, every year for four years (as long as you are still on the team) $1mm of that signing bonus is the yearly cap hit. SO in the last year of your contract $1mm will be hitting the Cap no matter if they cut you or you are on the team.
Here is an example of a 5 year $25mm “SB” and how it is accounted for:
* let’s say you are cut on May 30th after playing for 1 year then $20mm is “accelerated” and hits the Cap immediately. BUT if you are cut on June 2nd or later then $5mm hits the cap and $15mm is accelerated into the following year.
- So if you get cut in the last year of your contract the date doesn’t matter, just the remaining annual hit of $5mm hits the Cap.
- If you are cut in the 4th year of your contract before June 1st then the $10mm remaining hits the Cap but after June 1st then $5mm in the current year and $5mm in the following year.
there are exceptions, like Aaron whose contract was extended for 1 year and $1.75mm of this year’s Base Salary was converted to Signing Bonus $, this freed up $875k in Cap Space this year but left a potential $875k in dead$ hit next year if he is not on the Roster, retires or is cut or whatever.
Did this answer your question?
Awesome article.
Trade ideas: not sure we have anyone we could part with that would bring enough back. Someone mentioned Ward. It would break his heart and mine to trade him, but I would do it if we could get a quality O-lineman. Heath would be another possibility. Again, I don’t want to trade him, but I would do it if the O-line could be upgraded. In my dreams we could get two #1’s for Colbert to use, but we just don’t have the stuff to get them.
hhhheaaattttthhhhh!
"You have to under promise and over deliver." Mike Tomlin
I mean another #1 to go with our 2012 1st rounder.
hhhheaaattttthhhhh!
"You have to under promise and over deliver." Mike Tomlin
heath can't be traded
unless you are willing to take the $5.6mm dead $ accelerated Cap Hit next year. That’s another problem with trades, the signing bonus hit remains with the ’prior" club. Now you can trade away certain future guarantees BUT a signing bonus is paid previously or guaranteed as deferred compensation so there is no way out of it (without a retirement or other weird situation and even that is highly unlikely to get your team out of the liability).
NFL is not designed for trades, especially for teams that are near the Cap. A team like Tampa Bay with like $40-50mm in Cap Space could make any trade they want to with no regard for Dead Money. The whole trade system is designed to handicap rich teams and veteran teams as those are often the “better” relative teams.
No doubt this is a very complicated
subject for us loyal towel wavers, but gotta say….thank you. Its obvious ur put an extreme amount of time into this…outstanding.
In Communist China and Russia, you have 1 choice of "Kool Aid": RED
In America, you have 2 choices of "Kool Aid": RED (republican), AND BLUE (democrat)
The difference is, in China and Russia THEY KNOW IT’S KOOL AID.
welcome, my pleasure
there is no way to be 100% accurate with the numbers b/c it is not public information BUT i think the PDF of 2011 and 2012 can help you better understand the cap accounting and potential future moves. if i have the time, i will update this around draft and free agency time so you can have some ammo for water cooler talk:)
+1
Thanks for all of us for doing this, it’s fascinating.
by 57_Varieties on Oct 18, 2011 2:54 AM EDT up reply actions
idk about fascinating but the Front Office job is very complicated
expecially when you want to keep many veterans without pinning yourself into a corner if cuts must be made, truly a high-wire act.
way too much time:)
but now i have the tables so can update very quickly when it becomes relevant next year.
A few questions.
If Willie Colon can’t recover and is released this off-season it looks like his dead money would be 1.2 million each year through 2014, is that correct?
For Aaron Smith you highlighted his signing bonus remaining instead of the pro-rated amount, since the first is less does that mean we would only be on the hook for that amount?
If so how is that the case, did we not pro-rate his SB like the others, but made it front loaded?
With all the players we need to sign next year (esp. the little contract guys: Legs, Foster, K. Lewis, Redman, D. Johnson and maybe even W. Gay) I can see Smith being gone covering a lot of that, those guys will get raises but not big ones. Wallace might cost us somebody, as might Starks. Casey’s hit can’t eat both of those deals, Starks should get 4 mil at the least, and Wallace stands to make some good money. Hopefully Sylvester steps up and lets us cut either Foote or less likely Farrior, that would cover most of it.
Then again there is the draft, who knows what we grab this year, I’m hoping a great NT falls into our lap, we aren’t as strong run defense without Hampton in there.
phanta to answer your question
Colon – this is where the June 1st date comes in again, if you release Colon anytime in this league year or from March 1st thru June 1st of the 2012 NFL league year then full $4.8mm of “SBR” (original signing bonus was $6mm for 5 years) hits the cap in 2012, if you release him after June 1st, 2012 then $1.2mm is the cap hit for 2012 with $2.4mm hitting in 2013.
bottom line when you release a player with any “SBR” you can only delay the Dead$ Cap Hit for a maximum of 2 years (current year and next year) and under the worse-case scenario you can have all the “SBR” become Dead$ under the “Acceleration” principle.
Aaron Smith is a weird example because this had to be a contract extension because he was in the last year of his contract. SO if you try to convert Base Salary into “SB” without extending the contract there is no Cap effect. Therefore FO extended his contract mid-season making it a 2 year contract and putting $1.75mm of his 2011 base salary into $875k signing bonus for 2011 & 2012. Prior to his restructure on October 4, 2011 his “SBR” was $1.6mm so the restructure made it $2.475mm “SB” hit for 2011 ($1.6mm + $875k) but only $875k for 2012. This is definitely a little weird for the Steelers b/c I doubt they would do this mid-season based on how they operate.
So an Aaron Smith release next year adds $875k to dead$ but frees up $5.375mm in 2012 Cap Hit a net $4.5mm in Cap savings.
I hope this answers your questions.
P.S. ONE MORE NOTE I FORGOT TO ADD: For the new major contracts signed this year (Timmons, Troy, Ike, Colon) other than Woodley I divided their salary amounts equally amongst the remaining contract years, this may be right but it is more likely wrong. BUT without the contract details beyond 2011 (legit info unavailable) this is the best I could do.
BUT these 5 contracts signed this year may front-load more base Salary into 2012 so that these contracts can be restructured and do the same thing we did with 8 restructured contracts (highlighted burnt orange in the table above) this year. Because as you can see we are already over the Cap while missing like 19-20 Salaries for the 2012 FAs. In other words there is already a plan in place to create Cap Space, as needed, in 2012 using this year’s signings. Because the “SB” was relatively low compared to other teams we may have back-loaded guarantees into these new contract signings but left big non-guaranteed base salaries in 2011 that we can play with to create Cap Space. very complicated!
Thanks k99...
…Its comforting to see illustrated how the FO has kept its eye on the future. I may have issues with actual personnel decisions, but based on what you’ve shown here, no one should have a complaint about how the team has been positioned financially. Now, if we can only get true performers out of the draft picks we have.
Does it make sense to install a game plan that exceeds the capabilities of your personnel, or should you tailor your plan to the strengths of the people you have executing it. Corollary question: If the difference between 1st and 2nd string players is large, how wise is it to have highly complex game plans, knowing that injuries happen?
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
i wish i could answer your question but i am not qualified AT ALL
better to ask phanta or john stephens or the many extremely personnel specific/strategy football people, sorry, i am not your guy.
i am certain i know less than almost anyone here on game plans or player strength.
“a man’s gotta know his limitations” didn’t Clint Eastwood say that in Dirty Harry? not sure but it is apropos to me.
Who to trade?
At this point, I’d say no one, to be truthful. And definitely not Hines, as suggested earlier. He’s out soon, his role on the field, ie stats, will decrease but his importance will increase. FO will assure he will wear black & gold from first day to last day.
I’d dangle Dennis Dixon out to Oakland, if it weren’t for the fact he knows the offense and Ben is already booted up and hobbling. If the offer is right I’d do it though.
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. For more info, please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com
by Fifty-Eight on Oct 18, 2011 1:37 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
we weren't really considering trades unless it was an exceptional O-Line player came along at an exceptional price
It is brutal making trades when you are near the Cap b/c you keep any “SBR” on your books when you trade a player away and in the next league year that becomes Dead $. BUT if you are like the bengals with $27.16mm in Cap Space available you don’t give a crap about Dead $ b/c you have tremendous room. Hence you get rid of Carson Palmer and probably create more Cap Space by getting Palmer to repay part of his original “SB” or other guaranteed amounts that were potential future Dead$
.
some have reported that there is no remaining cap hit to cincy with carson
so i will dig into this further about how they got out of the remaining 2009 “SB” hit but since i don’t care much about the bengals i won’t work too hard on it.
What is it that you do?
That gives you the skills and avoids you getting fired for this shit?
I know you’ve said “finance” but that’s pretty broad, could you be more specific?
As always, thank you for the amazing information.
im self-employed so i am in a position to do this stuff
and im considering doing this full-time if i can put a deal together, i guess i am very lucky to be in this type of position.
you're a pimp aren't you?
You got a stable of ho’s and you’re keeping your pimp hand strong huh? that’s why you’re being so cryptic about it. lol
I can say this, you certainly have a gift for these types of informative articles, and it’s obvious you love doing it. Now just for the money part
Out of curiosity, who would you have to make a deal with in order to do this full time? Like a website or a magazine or something?
investors who would go in with me or just boot strap it, all you need is a site and there is very limited overhead.
but the problem is the stuff i like writing about often no one reads so it is a catch 22. but there is a huge opportunity going forward as people need content and interesting and detailed content is very hard to find. we’ll see, idk if i want to do it, i’d probably rather write a book.
or im am sure some will pay for the content
if it is good enough you can free-lance or whatever and get known.
Financial Dependence - on the Steelers
Why not pass this breakdown along to the Steelers (as evidence of your work ethic and dedication) and see if you can get employed by them part time. Or offer to get paid in Steelers tickets as a sort of friendly barter system…you could run the cap financials for all the teams in the league to help with any “negotiations” that might be taking place.
thanks but the steelers FO don't need me my 2 cents
if i can however put an interactive cap calculator together that can assimilate all the info and allow it to be changed and sorted around that might be worth something.
kk99, just printed off your chart to keep for future roster analysis ...
A lof people are saying this is an old roster, but Kevin Colbert and co. can certainly turn that around in a hurry with 20 players who will be free agents at the end of the year and another 10 veteran players who could be released for salary cap purposes.
Some very important decisions have to be made for the Steelers to keep that second window open for Super Bowls as Ben enter into his 30’s.
by datruth4life2.0 on Oct 19, 2011 2:57 PM EDT reply actions

by 

































