Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

More Super Bowl History: Teams with the Worst Regular-Season Records and How They Fared in the Super Bowl

TAMPA FL - FEBRUARY 01:  (FILE PHOTO)  James Harrison #92 of the Pittsburgh Steelers scores a touchdown after running back an interception for 100 yards in the second quarter against the Arizona Cardinals during Super Bowl XLIII on February 1 2009 at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa Florida.  Super Bowl XLV will pit the Pittsburgh Steelers against the Green Bay Packers on February 6 2011.  (Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images)

This is the next post in the series about teams who make it to the Super Bowl after overcoming regular-season struggles.  If you want to read about teams that made it to the Super Bowl after beginning the season with a loss, click here.  This post looks at teams that began the season with more than one loss. If you want to read about teams that had a substantial losing streak during the regular season and yet made it to the Super Bowl, click here.

This post looks at the Super Bowl teams that had the poorest regular season records. DVOA analysis will be given for the post-1991 teams that have not already been covered in an earlier post. 

Star-divide

Super Bowl XIV

Los Angeles Rams (9-7) vs. Pittsburgh Steelers (12-4)

Final Result: Steelers 31, Rams 19

 

Super Bowl XXIII

San Francisco 49ers (10-6) vs. Cincinnati Bengals (12-4)

Final Result: 49ers 20, Bengals 16

 

Super Bowl XLII

New York Giants (10-6) vs. New England Patriots (16-0)

Final Result: Giants 17, Patriots 14 

 

Super Bowl XLIII

Arizona Cardinals (9-7) vs. Pittsburgh Steelers (12-4)

Final Result: Steelers 27, Cardinals 23

 

Super Bowl XLV

Packers (10-6) vs. Steelers (12-4)

Final Result: Packers 31, Steelers 25

 

Let's look at these a bit more closely. Before I deal with the individual games, it is interesting to note that so far teams have been able to overcome a 10-6 season—all three teams with that record went on to win the Super Bowl. But having a 9-7 record didn't work out too well for either the Rams or the Cardinals.

 

The Rams/Steelers game was covered extensively in the previous post, so I'll move on, other than to note that this is the first time a team with that poor a regular-season record reached the Super Bowl. 

 

There is no DVOA information for the 1988 season, so there won't be any analysis from that standpoint, but we can still consider the circumstances of Super Bowl XXIII

That Super Bowl was legendary coach Bill Walsh's final game as an NFL coach. (Walsh took the job as Head Coach at Stanford four years later, a position he held for three years.) The season had its definite ups and downs, as you might expect from the record. The strange thing was that Walsh was starting both Joe Montana and Steve Young at QB. This is possibly because the 49ers had been to the playoffs the previous three years and, astonishingly, Jerry Rice, Joe Montana, and RB Roger Craig couldn't produce a single touchdown between them in any of the three games. Hard to believe when Jerry Rice led the NFL in 1987 with 22 touchdowns—twice as many as his closest competitor (Eagles WR Mike Quick with 11.)

The team as a whole was stronger than its record indicated, though. Just to give one example, the defensive backs had 18 interceptions between them that season, in an era when QBs didn't throw the ball quite as often as they do today.

The Bengals were no slouches that year either, with six Pro Bowl selections on their offense. Eddie Brown, their No. 1 WR, had almost as many yards that season as Jerry Rice, and the same number of touchdowns (9.) LT Anthony Muñoz was NFL Offensive Lineman of the Year for the third time in his career. But despite this, and despite their superior regular-season record, San Francisco was heavily favored, and of course went on to win the game.

The Giants/Patriots game has also been extensively covered in the previous post, so we'll just skip over that as well.

The last two games involve the Steelers. In both cases it was the other team with the less-than-stellar season record. The outcomes were rather different, unfortunately.

 

The Giants/Patriots game was possibly the biggest mismatch in Super Bowl history, in terms of the numbers at least. Until Super Bowl XLIII.  Super Bowl XLII was a mismatch. Super Bowl XLIII should have looked like taking candy from a baby. But as we all know to our cost, on Any Given Sunday the worst team in the league can beat the best one. There are really no gimmes in football.

Let's see how lopsided the figures are according to DVOA.

Arizona's total DVOA was a negative number, -3.2%, placing them at them No. 21 in the league. The Steelers were No. 2 at 29.6%. The Steelers' defense was No. 1 in the league—the Cardinals had the No. 23 defense. The only place they bettered the Steelers was their offense, at No. 15, compared to No. 21. Even our special teams, at a scarcely impressive No. 23, beat out the Cardinals, who rejoiced in position No. 28. And although the Cardinals were hanging on with their fingernails to a 9-7 record, according to Pythagorean Wins they should have only had an 8-8 season.

The Weighted DVOA figures brought no comfort to the Arizona faithful. The Cardinals' total DVOA dropped to an even more negative number, -10%, lowering them to No. 22 in the league. This is scarcely surprising when you consider that they lost 4 of their final 6 games, allowing at least 35 points in each loss. The Steelers, on the other hand, moved up to 34.4% to grab the No. 1 spot from the Eagles. This Super Bowl wasn't even like taking candy from a baby—it was more like David and Goliath, with the Steelers starring as the giant and the Cardinals as the scrawny shepherd boy. 

But although David did some substantial damage with his slingshot, Goliath roused himself just before it was too late and won on a last-minute Hail Mary to the far corner of the endzone.  MVP Santonio Holmes caught it on his tippie-toes and managed to scrape them in bounds before plunging to the ground. It wasn't a comfortable game for Steeler Nation, but it sure was exciting. 

 

And as much as I don't want to talk about the February 2011 Super Bowl, duty compels me.

Much has been made of Green Bay's unprecedented number of players on IR—15 by the end of the season. (They also had a DE who was indefinitely suspended for a second-degree felony conviction prior to the season.) Not so much has been made of the fact that this happened in the first uncapped year in a very long time. This gave their Front Office the ability to go out and sign free agents at will, with no cap consequences—something that the Steelers are no doubt envious of right about now. 

But the question is, did they? I decided to have a look at how they replaced the wounded warriors. The list of transactions for that season made me dizzy to look at, but as far as I can tell, they replaced some of the injured with players from their practice squad (and the practice squad was a dizzying whirl of cuts and signings in and of itself.) They also brought in a DE, traded a conditional 2011 draft pick for a safety, signed three LBs that were either claimed off waivers or were free agents, signed a TE and another DE, and finally signed a C/OG. So while they used backups and promoted guys from the practice squad, they also did a lot of dealing in free agency during the season.

But when you look at the DVOA numbers you can see just how close the two teams were, despite the constant upheaval on the Packers. And lest we forget, we had an unprecedented number of injuries on the offensive line ourselves, with only a single lineman, the 36-year-old Flozell Adams, starting every game of the season. The line that started in the Super Bowl was a new configuration from any used during the previous games, with the exception of the latter part of the final playoff game. The loss, of course, was C Maurkice Pouncey, who had looked like the best member of the offensive line.

*Slap* Thanks. I'm calmer now, and here are the numbers:

Green Bay had a total DVOA of 23.4%, No. 3 in the league. The Steelers had a much higher DVOA of 36.8%, second only to the Patriots, who had a total DVOA of 45.4%. And yet the Jets (No. 6 with 18.3%) beat them. It just goes to show that the numbers only tell you so much.

The Steelers and Packers were quite comparable in two of the three phases. Green Bay was No. 7 in offense; the Steelers were No. 3. Their No. 2 defense was only topped by ours, at No. 1. Only in special teams did we have a substantial advantage—the Steelers were No. 16, the Packers No. 26.  Not too surprisingly, given these figures, the two teams had the exact same Pythagorean Wins figure—12.1. 

But Green Bay had actually dropped to No. 4 in Weighted DVOA by season's end, while the Steelers held fast at No. 2. Despite that, and despite the fact that the Packers as the No. 6 seed had to play three playoff games instead of two, they were slightly favored for the big game.

We all know how it turned out. My lips are now sealed on the subject. 

 

And this post, like so many of mine, has gone on long enough, so I'll finish up the series next week with the best teams that didn't make it to the Super Bowl. Hint: at least one of them is a Steelers team...

Comment 7 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Only one thing is certain in the NFL

NOTHING is certain. Go Steelers!

"It's a dog eat dog world and I'm wear'in milkbone underwear" - Norm

by Tx_STEELER on Oct 6, 2011 7:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice writing, I like all the articles I’ve read of yours. All interesting topics and you dig below that top layer to see why something happened or why something didn’t. For being a relatively new fan, I think you stated you just started following heavily a few years ago in a past write-up, you seem to know the team quite well. I always wondered where the Packers replaced all those guys from, I knew they had 15 on IR but didn’t know a player was suspended too. Do you or anybody know what GB’s cap number would have been? They still signed quite a few FA and not all the cap number comes of the books I don’t think. Also, maybe you could write something about Arians and the offense, I think they have won in spite of the playcalling, not because of it, because of their talent level and wondered if there was some formula to figure out if the offense really would be better or worse without Arians. I’ve always hated him since he was with the Browns OC and let us come back on them in the 2002 playoffs but they do win with him so I don’t really know. Keep writing please.

by SteelCity G on Oct 6, 2011 8:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Thank you for your kind words.

The Packers didn’t have any cap issues last season, because there wasn’t one. I have no idea where that left them this season, though, as I’m afraid the Steelers are the only team I study in any depth. When I have to write about another team I use my best friend Google : )

I’m afraid that I’m not much help on the Arians front. First of all, I’m not down on him like so many here. Is he the best OC in the history of football? I’m quite certain he isn’t, or he would have a head coaching job by now. Is he a complete disaster? Well, we’ve been to three Super Bowls in six seasons. Our offense may not have won the last two single-handedly, but our defense didn’t either. The offense were certainly contributors.

And I can’t imagine how one could figure out a formula to judge whether the players would be better or worse under another OC. I’m not even sure you could tell for sure if you took the exact same group of players and put in another OC. As we have all noticed this season, a defense comprised of exactly the same players that played in last season’s historically good defense, with a few minor exceptions, has been giving up a lot of yards on the ground. Rationally that makes no sense, but there you have it.

Why is that? There are so many variables (the scheme they are playing against and the health of the players are two big ones) that it seems to me that it would be impossible to calculate. Even things like whether they like their coach matter, although you wouldn’t think that they should.

Here’s a couple of examples why it’s almost impossible to make these calculations about human beings. Kemo has never been known as a great pass blocker, but last Sunday he was stinking it up on a great many plays. Today we find out that he was playing through several injuries, including essentially not having the use of one of his hands. He never would have been on the field except that we had run out of bodies. Should they have thrown in an untested rookie instead? Maybe so. But we’ll never know whether that would have worked better or been worse. Every game and even every play in every game is a unique situation with a number of possible outcomes.

And here’s another story. My son-in-law is Welsh, and naturally follows soccer, or football as he would call it. We were discussing how when a team doesn’t seem quite right, you never know why or what’s going on. One of the best teams in Britain was having a banner year a few seasons ago, and suddenly they unraveled. One of their better players went to the owners and asked to be traded, and the owners refused. After a while, when the owners continued to refuse to trade him, the player went public with the problem. It seemed that the team captain had been sleeping with the player’s wife, and when he found out about it naturally he was upset. The situation had the result of completely dividing the locker room, and despite the fact that they had an incredibly talented team, it went nowhere that year.

I certainly don’t think that’s a problem for the Steelers. The point is that things that have little or nothing to do with football can have a big effect on the team. So can a bunch of people playing substantially below their best because of injuries or other issues. All of this is a very long way of saying that we will never have any way to know, at least that I can think of, whether the offense would be better or worse with a different OC. And it’s pretty moot anyhow, as Arians is here for the rest of this season at any rate.

"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin

by Rebecca Rollett on Oct 6, 2011 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great Post.

I went and read the other posts related to this article too. Wow you have done a fantastic job.

Let's Go Giants!

by BB1156 on Oct 7, 2011 11:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks!

"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin

by Rebecca Rollett on Oct 8, 2011 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Super Bowl 23 has a Steelers connection

because Dick LeBeau was the Bengals defensive coordinator. His schemes were new to the NFL at that time, and that Bengals defense gave the 49ers fits that day. Were it not for the game winning drive, the Cincinnati defense would have been one of the stories of the game.

Tim Krumrie, the Pro Bowl NT, broke his leg early in that game, but the Bengals were able to frustrate San Fran most of the day.

by SteelStealth on Oct 8, 2011 12:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Thanks

for the additional information – that’s really interesting!

"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin

by Rebecca Rollett on Oct 8, 2011 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Your all time Steeler regret?
5467103_small
Hines Ward: a different look part 1. Hines vs. the big boys.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Isaac Redman 2012: Should we temper our expectations?
Photo_small
Worry Warts
6-trophies_small
The Saint Will Be The Starter for 2012 - The Whole Season.
Trophies_small
Why Is Rashard Mendenhall Still On This Roster?
2009-week6_1440x900_benroethlisberger_small
Pads - To wear or not to wear
Small
53 Man Roster (Way too early edition)
Small
WHEN DO TICKETS GO ON SALE?
Small
Submitted for your approval: Steeler names for this year's pledge class
Small
The biggest offseason ever

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo