Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

AFC Playoff Picture: Assessing the Injury Situation of the Playoff Contenders

Photo

With five games and no bye weeks to go, the top contenders in the AFC have a varying degree of injuries. While all nine of the AFC's top-seeded teams won in Week 12, some suffered some big injuries (Houston and Pittsburgh), some rebounded well despite a few previous injuries (Baltimore and Oakland) and some returned a key player or two (Cincinnati). 

With five games to go in a white-hot competitive conference, injuries will likely spell the difference between playing beyond Week 17 and going home for the rest of the winter. Here's a breakdown, team-by-team, of injuries sustained in Week 12 in the AFC. 

Star-divide

1. Houston Texans*
  • Record: 8-3
  • Remaining Games: vs. Atlanta, at Cincinnati, vs. Carolina, at Indianapolis, vs. Tennessee
  • Injury Forecast: QB Matt Schaub, QB Matt Leinart

The AFC's top seed can't keep a quarterback healthy. Leinart's much anticipated debut lasted just shy of one half, and a reported broken collar bone will keep him next to Schaub on the Injured-Reserve list. T.J. Yates, a rookie 5th round draft pick in 2011 from North Carolina, looks to be the Texans hope to advance to the playoffs for the first time in team history. Much will be written about the Texans' running game, and how that will help Yates out, but the bottom line is to win in the NFL, you need a quarterback who can complete passes. You can expect Arian Foster and Ben Tate to rush, rush and rush some more, but Houston's going to struggle to hang onto their No. 1 seed. 

2. New England Patriots*
  • Record: 8-3
  • Remaining Games: vs. Indianapolis, at Washington, at Denver, vs. Miami, vs. Buffalo
  • Injury Forecast: RT Sebastian Vollmer

Unless the names "Brady" or "Gronkowski" appear on the Patriots injury report, it doesn't seem to matter. Brady was razor-sharp in a complete shellacking of host Philadelphia in Week 12, and the scary part is they left some points on the field. Since a two-game losing streak, Brady has been the best player in football, throwing for 924 yards and eight touchdowns in New England's last three games (all at least 18 point victories). The Patriots are averaging 36 points a game in that same span of time. 

3. Baltimore Ravens*
  • Record: 8-3

  • Remaining Games: at Cleveland, vs. Indianapolis, at San Diego, vs. Cleveland, at Cincinnati
  • Key Injuries: LB Ray Lewis, LB Dannell Ellerbe

Similar to New England, injuries don't currently appear to be much of an issue for the AFC North-leading Ravens. If anything, Baltimore's defense has played better without Lewis - who has missed the last two games with a toe injury. Without Lewis and Ellerbe, the Ravens defense racked up nine sacks in a 16-6 win on Thanksgiving. With a slate of only AFC opponents remaining, only one of which has a winning record (Cincinnati), Baltimore holds a strong position in the race for a first-round bye. 

(*both NFL.com and ESPN.com list the top three seeds as Houston, New England and Baltimore, respectively.  Baltimore defeated Houston, but since Houston and New England haven't played each other, the first tiebreaker, head-to-head records, is eliminated. According to NFL.com's tiebreaking procedures, though, the second tiebreaker is division record, which would rank Baltimore and Houston (both 1.000) over New England (.750) That moves New England to the third seed. The tiebreaker between Houston and Baltimore then becomes head-to-head, giving Baltimore the No. 1 seed. Maybe someone can better explain why both sites list Houston as the No. 1 seed, but they both seem to be going on conference record, which is the third tiebreaker, and not applicable right now.)

4. Oakland Raiders
  • Record: 7-4

  • Remaining Games: at Miami, at Green Bay, vs. Detroit, at Kansas City, vs. San Diego
  • Key Injuries: RB Darren McFadden, WR Jacoby Ford, WR Denarius Moore, RB Taiwan Jones

Perhaps the most injury-depleted team in the playoff hunt, the Raiders are still winning games. Moore and Jones may have added a little bit to Oakland's offense - that got six field goals from Sebastian Janikowski in a 25-20 win over Chicago in Week 12 - but the Raiders got enough big plays on a stout Bears defense to pull out a big win. The big factor for Oakland's push for a division title is the absence of McFadden. Oakland becomes one of the most complete teams in the AFC when he returns from a foot injury that's sidelined him since October. 

5. Pittsburgh Steelers
  • Record: 8-3

  • Remaining Games: vs. Cincinnati, vs. Cleveland, at San Francisco, vs. St. Louis, at Cleveland
  • Key Injuries: SS Troy Polamalu, OLB LaMarr Woodley

Polamalu's alleged concussion came early in the Steelers' Week 12 win at Kansas City when he hit back-up OT Steve Maneri's knee head-first. He appeared to lose consciousness for a second after the hit was made, but he walked off the field under his own power. He did not return to the game, however, and that could be a major issue for the Steelers as they prepare for the home stretch. Steelers C Maurkice Pouncey left the game with an illness as well. His status is unknown.

The Steelers schedule gets wonky from this point on; after the huge showdown with Cincinnati (nearly a make-or-break game for both teams), they have a short week to prepare for a Thursday night Week 14 game against Cleveland. Then they travel cross-country for a Monday Night game at San Francisco, they'll probably land back in Pittsburgh early Tuesday morning after a red-eye flight to begin preparing for another short week game on Saturday against St. Louis. They end the season with a tough road game at Cleveland. Health will be critical for the Steelers, who likely will get Woodley back against the Bengals. 

6. Cincinnati Bengals
  • Record: 7-4

  • Remaining Games: at Pittsburgh, vs. Houston, at St. Louis, vs. Arizona, vs. Baltimore
  • Key Injuries: WR Jerome Simpson, SS Chris Crocker

The news surrounding the Bengals is more about who they got back from injury as opposed to who was hurt. A.J. Green came up with a huge catch at the end of the Bengals' comeback 23-20 win over Cleveland in Week 12. No word yet on whether Simpson or Crocker - both left Sunday's game - sustained serious injuries, but Cincinnati is arguably the most resilient team in the AFC. The win over the Browns marked the fifth time this year the Bengals have come back from a 10 point deficit to win a game this year. 

7. Denver Broncos
  • Record: 6-5

  • Remaining Games: at Minnesota, vs. Chicago, vs. New England, at Buffalo, vs. Kansas City
  • Key Injuries: CB/KR Cassius Vaughn

Vaughn fractured his leg on the game's opening kickoff, and will likely keep him out for the rest of the year. The Broncos only suited up 52 players - and just two quarterbacks - in their 16-13 win over San Diego in Week 12. The Broncos elected not to sign a replacement for QB Kyle Orton, whom they cut last week. It's expected that practice squad QB Adam Weber will be signed to the active roster this week. Other than that, the Broncos don't appear to have many injuries. With a defense that's allowed no more than 17 points in the past four games, they appear to be peaking at the right time. 

8. New York Jets
  • Record: 6-5

  • Remaining Games: at Washington, vs. Kansas City, at Philadelphia, vs. New York Giants, at Miami
  • Key Injuries: DE Mike DeVito

DeVito left the Jets' 28-24 Week 12 win over Buffalo with a knee injury - the same injury he's been battling since Week 7. He missed two games earlier this season. That could be critical to the Jets playoff chances, which are circling the drain even with the win over the Bills

9. Tennessee Titans
  • Record: 6-5

  • Remaining Games: at Buffalo, vs. New Orleans, at Indianapolis, vs. Jacksonville, at Houston
  • Key Injuries: LB Barrett Ruud

Some Titans fans may not even have a problem with Ruud's absence. Rookie Colin McCarthy is playing strong defensive football, and led the Titans with 10 tackles. He had the game-winning interception as the Titans kept their playoff hopes alive with a 23-17 win over the Buccaneers in Tampa in Week 12. 

Comment 91 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Texans have just played more conference games if both teams won out we would have the edge because we beat them H2H.

On Ed Reed:
"I’ve told him to his face many times, ‘You’re the greatest safety ever to play the game,’"
"We all learn from each other, but we all learn most from him."
- Troy Polamalu

by AV23 on Nov 28, 2011 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

I added asterisks and this explanation:

“both NFL.com and ESPN.com list the top three seeds as Houston, New England and Baltimore, respectively. Baltimore defeated Houston, but since Houston and New England haven’t played each other, the first tiebreaker, head-to-head records, is eliminated. According to NFL.com’s tiebreaking procedures, though, the second tiebreaker is division record, which would rank Baltimore and Houston (both 1.000) over New England (.750) That moves New England to the third seed. The tiebreaker between Houston and Baltimore then becomes head-to-head, giving Baltimore the No. 1 seed. Maybe someone can better explain why both sites list Houston as the No. 1 seed, but they both seem to be going on conference record, which is the third tiebreaker, and not applicable right now.”

I really hate these things. I’m just gonna stick with this for now, cuz seedings after Week 12 mean nothing anyway. The point is just going over injuries.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Tiebreaker

There are 4 teams with 8-3 record

1. reduce to 1 team per division with division tiebreaker – PIT out
2. Best record in Conference orders the teams left HOU-NE-BAL based on Conf win % to date

by Steely McSmash on Nov 28, 2011 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

According to NFL.com, though, it’s not conference record, it’s divisional record. I very well could be misinterpreting this, so someone help me out here:

http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingprocedures

Three or More Clubs

(Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are eliminated during any step, tie breaker reverts to step 1 of the two-club format).

Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the clubs). (*this is eliminated because they haven’t all played each other).

Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division. (New England is eliminated…and according to the note above, if two teams are tied after one of these tiebreakers, it reverts to Step 1 of the two-club format.

Two Clubs

Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).

So Baltimore is 1, Houston is 2, New England is 3.

I really don’t know why I care about this. Back to Game Notebook story…

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Here you go

From NFL.com tiebreaking procedures:

You first need to look under OTHER TIE-BREAKING PROCEDURES and step 3 gives you the following:

To determine home-field priority among division-titlists, apply Wild Card tie-breakers.

You then need to head to that section:
Three or More Clubs

(Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are eliminated, tie breaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-club format.)

1. Apply division tie breaker to eliminate all but the highest ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie breaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two Wild-Card participants.

2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.)
 
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.

Step one is used to help determine the top seed within each division It is not used to actually seed those teams.

Division records would not be used as a tiebreaker because there is no commonality at all between the opponents played.

by King Coebra on Nov 28, 2011 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry

That looks really messy. Let me summarize. Divisional records are not used to break tiebreakers amongst teams from different divisions because there are NO common opponents. The divisional records are only used to break ties amongst teams within the same division. Once the top teams in each divison are identified the top two criteria then becomes:

1. Head to head (if any team has swept the others they get the seed)
2. Conference record

Hope that clears things up.

by King Coebra on Nov 28, 2011 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

AHA!

You’re right, good call.

It’s convoluted as hell (division winners use the wildcard tie breaker, but wildcard teams use the divisional tie breaker), but you’re right, it IS conference record.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 2:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Indeed

Good second explanation above, by King Coebrea.

How weird is it that there’s a reasonable possibility that the Patriots and Ravens, who tend to play each other a lot on wild card weekend, will possibly clinch the two first-round byes this year?

If Houston had a QB (and Mario Williams, and a healthier Johnson) I would give them the nod. As it, I think the Patriots are playing the best football right now, and BAL is likely to only stumble once more. Steelers get the WC, Bengals probably do not get the other.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Nov 28, 2011 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

WC

I think the Steelers and Bengals get the two WCs. I don’t see the Broncos or Jets catching them.

anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked

by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Nov 29, 2011 8:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I def don't see the Broncos doing it

But I retain a sneaking (and irritated) suspicion that the Jets may once again sneak into the playoffs, after underwhelming during the season.

I agree with you that the math looks like the Bengals, but I chalk them for at least two more losses (Pitt and BAL), and keep feeling like someone is going to leapfrog them.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Nov 29, 2011 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

“I really hate these things. I’m just gonna stick with this for now, cuz seedings after Week 12 mean nothing anyway.”

You’re right, Neil, and if predictions at this stage were airplanes this place would be an airport! LOL!

by 21in69 on Nov 28, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

You forgot Mario Williams for Houston

He’s a pretty big loss – he was killing it this year. I know Connor Barwin and Brooks Reed played well last night, but that was pretty fluky.

by JDSpartan on Nov 28, 2011 11:17 AM EST reply actions  

It’s meant to be more current – as in relative to the last week or so. Houston has had plenty of time to adjust to life without Williams. Clearly, a defense isn’t going to be as good without a guy of his caliber, but we’ve “moved on,” in a sense.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh, gotcha

Also, I should have mentioned that this is a good idea for an article, well done.

by JDSpartan on Nov 28, 2011 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Pouncey

Pouncey basically got a week off for nagging injuries to heal. If he really just had a virus, this will become a positive.

by ballparkfranks on Nov 28, 2011 12:28 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed

As did Woodley. Unfortunately, though, Pouncey going out means Kemoeatu has to go back in, which defeated the whole point of benching him in the first place. You’ll notice our yards per carry was in the toilet again, and it was against a team that can’t stop the run well.

Mendenhall was running hard, I wish he had some more help.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I am constantly second guessing what the deal is

with Mendy.

I don’t mean that as a criticism; I like him, and think he’s probably a bit under-rated. But there are times where it constantly looks like he is ABOUT to do something awesome, and then doesn’t quite get there. I think last night was one of those games, as you pointed out, where with a LITTLE more help, he would have shown just how good he can be.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Nov 28, 2011 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

(*both NFL.com and ESPN.com list the top three seeds as Houston, New England and Baltimore, respectively. Baltimore defeated Houston, but since Houston and New England haven’t played each other, the first tiebreaker, head-to-head records, is eliminated. According to NFL.com’s tiebreaking procedures, though, the second tiebreaker is division record, which would rank Baltimore and Houston (both 1.000) over New England (.750) That moves New England to the third seed. The tiebreaker between Houston and Baltimore then becomes head-to-head, giving Baltimore the No. 1 seed. Maybe someone can better explain why both sites list Houston as the No. 1 seed, but they both seem to be going on conference record, which is the third tiebreaker, and not applicable right now.)

You and me both man. I have seen and heard a bunch of people say that if Baltimore wins out, we are the 1 seed. But then I see on NFL.com them saying that right now, we are the 3 seed. Don’t really get it.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 1:02 PM EST reply actions  

I’m pretty certain I’m right (Baltimore 1, Houston 2, New England 3). My guess is NFL.com posted it, and ESPN.com copied it, trusting the league knows and understands its own rules. Whomever is publishing the standings at ESPN.com must not follow the NFL.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

You are right, I just ran through everything. If Baltimore wins out, we are the #1 seed. And my guess is that Houston isn’t going to win out with TJ Yates at QB….

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Correct

However, the current AFC standings do not factor in prognostications of future performance. IF the playoffs started right now Houston would be the #1 seed due to their 7-2 conference record. New England at 6-2 would be #2 and Baltimore at 5-2 would be #3.

by King Coebra on Nov 28, 2011 1:27 PM EST up reply actions  

UPDATE

We’re wrong, it IS conference record. If the playoffs ended today, Houston is 1, New England is 2 and Baltimore is 3.

BUT…

If they all win out out, Baltimore will have the No. 1 seed by virtue of a perfect divisional record (eliminating NE) and a head-to-head win over Houston.

Houston would be No. 2 due to a perfect divisional record.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Not quite

You seem hell bent on wanting to include divisional records as a criteria but it is not. Thought we’d already cleared that up (I’m just messing with you – no offense I hope). Should all 3 teams win out (none will – Pats most likely) then the next criteria becomes record vs. common opponents, and I’m not sure who wins that at this juncture and I’m too lazy to work it out right now. Maybe in a few weeks when the picture gets a little clearer.

by King Coebra on Nov 28, 2011 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought divisional records comes after conference records.

Nevermind, don’t respond, I quit. D-U-N, done.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 3:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree

Pats most likely to win out, sadly.

BAL stumbles once more; not sure if it’s to a surly Browns team looking to play spoiler, or to a Cincy team trying to grab the last wild card.

Houston will make it to the dance, but they’ve lost too many important players to dominate the last 1/3rd of the season, or to win once they get there in January. I see them falling to #3 if not #4, at this point.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Nov 28, 2011 5:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I haven't looked at their remaining games

but I have been wondering if the Titans can catch and eliminate the Texans. If that happens we could see the Texans out of the playoffs.

anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked

by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Nov 29, 2011 8:20 AM EST up reply actions  

baltimore has 2 afc losses

New england has 2 afc losses too..

A man is innocent untill proven guilty...Even if it's Ben Roethlisberger!
'I rather have a German division in front of me than a French division behind me'..General George Patton
" I don't care if he has two horns and a tail, as long as he is anti-communist"..General Douglas MacArthur..
"The way to end our dependence on foreign oil is to keep our tires properly inflated"....B. Hussein Obama
"Government is not the solution to our problems, it is the cause of them" Ronald Wilson Reagan..40th President of the United States

by nycsteelerfan on Nov 28, 2011 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey Malor

Mike Wallace’s drop last night reminded me of a Limas Sweed drop. Notice that I am not saying they are the exact same person.

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Nov 28, 2011 1:24 PM EST reply actions  

BLASPHEMY!

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

It kind of reminded me of Torrey Smith

Except without the five PI calls in crucial situations.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Steeler fans complaining about the refs = lulz for me.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 1:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Ravens fans complaining about Steelers fans complaining about refs= Irony on several levels

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 1:32 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

You think it bothers me that you are upset about some PI calls that didn’t go your way? You wild’n son.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Complaining probably wasn't the best word to use

But it’s still the height of irony.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Ravens would be 4-7 if not for the refs giving them the last 4 games. Still gonna get bounced in January, Flacco just isn’t consistent or good enough to get it done.

The Ravens are pus*ies compared to the Steelers. - Peyton Hillis 2010

by malaki on Nov 28, 2011 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Ravens would be 4-7 if not for the refs giving them the last 4 games.

Damn, they have helped us THAT much? I need to take the purple glasses off obviously.

Flacco just isn’t consistent or good enough to get it done.

Funny to hear Steeler fans say this after Flacco has been the only QB this season to throw for 3 TD’s on you defense, pass for 300 yards on your defense, and lead an offense that scored more than 21 points on your defense…..TWICE!!!!

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Matt Moore has thrown 3 td's in a game....

This message will self destruct

Who the hell's interrupting my Kung Fu? - Black Dynamite

With two D's, for a double dose of this pimpin'

by FrankWyt on Nov 28, 2011 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Every time someone says something about Flacco and his inconsistency or average play, you come back with, “But he did good against Pittsburgh herppa derrrpppp!”, which only furthers our belief that playing us is like your Super Bowl. But keep it up, it’s pretty damn funny.

"I’ll consider myself a dirty player when my mom calls me a dirty player." - Ndamukong Suh

by Riddlah. on Nov 28, 2011 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

If you are mocking my Smith/Sweed comparison, I still stand by that statement in the context in which it was given.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

No, I’m mocking Malor for not understanding that the comparison is not saying Torrey is doomed to be Sweed. I fully agree that his body control is terrible.

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Nov 28, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Malor is fun to mock…so is Smith. Get that boy to calm down, he’s acting like his kid is being held hostage and they’ll kill him if he doesn’t score on every play.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Me or Smith?

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Smith

He is young and will likely get better.

anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked

by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Nov 29, 2011 8:22 AM EST up reply actions  

That is the same thing Brady Quinn did to Suggs and Suggs almost rang him by his neck.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I remember that

It was the most impressive thing I’ve ever seen Quinn do on an NFL field. Not bright, but impressive.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Nov 28, 2011 5:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd

Can someone post the gif of sanchez jumping at the DB move?

by IronJake on Nov 28, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

IMO, the injuries to Schaub and Leinart make the Steelers, Ravens, and Pats the only real contenders in the AFC

And contrary to popular opinion, all three would have a good chance against GB in the Super Bowl.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 1:29 PM EST reply actions  

I think the Packers would annihilate the Packers. I thought our secondary was decent last year and look what Rodgers did to them. The Pats secondary is putrid. Rodgers would set SB records.

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Nov 28, 2011 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Eh, Pats-Packers would be a shootout

That’s probbaly the league’s dream matchup for ratings, but GB’s D isn’t good enough for the Packers to blow out any teams with a good offense.

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t understand how the Packers D is so bad this year. They didn’t lose anyone, right? 25th in NY/A and 29th in Y/Rush. They are good at forcing turnovers though. That’s not bad.

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Nov 28, 2011 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe because Rodgers and crew are just dominating on offense, that it doesn’t force their defense to have to play so tight. When you are up 23 points midway through the 3rd quarter, it doesn’t seem so bad if the other team goes on a 90 yard scoring drive as long as it is 6 or 7 minutes long.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s easy to say that, but I’m not sure how accurate that is. They’ve slammed the door on some teams (Denver and the second Minnesota game), but they’ve let teams hang around too (first Minnesota game, Tampa, San Diego). I think their defense just gives up big plays. Much of that is caused by the fact teams know they need to make big plays to beat them, whether the Packers have put points on the board already or not.

Many of those big plays are caused by the fact their corners gamble a ton, and aren’t right all the time. They get picks, but they give up big plays too. At the same time, I’d gamble if I were them, cuz all you’re betting on, essentially, is the offense will pick the defense up if they get scored on. Seems like a safe bet.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed and good explanation

I get the feeling that teams try more “let’s see if this works!” stuff against the Packers out of desperation, and being behind. I would also guess that, because it DOES work some of the time, that explains part of their less impressive defensive stats.

But, I also get the feeling, and have all season, that their DB’s are gambling more this season BECAUSE they know their offense can bail them out, so they have more turnovers, but also more yards and points allowed against them. They actually look a ton like the 2009 Saints, in that regard.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Nov 28, 2011 5:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Turnovers are streaky

They got a lot in the playoffs last year. I’m not sure they’ll be so lucky again. And they did lose Nick Barnett and Cullen Jenkins(And Collins to injury).

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Nov 29, 2011 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

I think the Packers would annihilate the Packers

I don’t know about that, I might have to go with the Packers on that one. We are just in disagreement I guess…

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Har har
I think the Packers would annihilate the Packers Patriots

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Nov 28, 2011 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Are you kidding?!? There’s no way the Packers are gonna beat the Packers! Packers by two touchdowns, easy.

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Or, you might say...

…the Packers beating themselves

United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.

by PaVaSteeler on Nov 28, 2011 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

What mature consenting adults do in private

is not the business of the state.

anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked

by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Nov 29, 2011 8:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Steelers secondary

Was not so great last year, and Troy was playing hurt. They didn’t have the training or the personnel to go man to man.

I’d love a rematch, but I think the NFL might have something to say about that.

by IronJake on Nov 28, 2011 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Troy was still nursing his Achilles & McFadden wasn’t nearly 100%. When healthy they were decent but that wasn’t the case in the SB.

The Ravens are pus*ies compared to the Steelers. - Peyton Hillis 2010

by malaki on Nov 28, 2011 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Wallace will start catching everything again. But a few off games could make him signable for a reasonable 9-10 mill per year

I would love to see Wallace catch every long-bomb near him— next year. Mike is worth a massive contract, but just to keep him considering $$’s that are fair and good for the team, a few 3 catch, 50 yard games are OK. Until the playoffs. The Steelers do not need Mike thinking about Larry Fitzgerald numbers.

by buddydial on Nov 28, 2011 2:59 PM EST reply actions  

You think his recent lack of production DROPS his likely contract to $9 or $10 million a year? I want you to be my agent then!

He’s disappeared the last few games, his numbers are evening out and now he’s got a guy in the division putting up the same deep numbers he has been. If anything, his value has gone down to mid-level WR money ($7 mil per).

by Neal Coolong on Nov 28, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

12-4

With our injuries and our recent primetime road games performance I would see us losing to SF. That leaves us with a 12-4 record, good for a 5th seed.

NE is getting the first seed no doubt about that. There is no QB left who can throw for 50 times and shred their defense. Ravens will #2.

1. Pats.
2. Ravens.
3. AFC South.
4. AFC West.
5. Steelers.
6. Bengals.

"He had no teeth, and he was slobbering all over himself. I'm thinking, 'You can have your money back, just get me out of here. Let me go be an accountant." I can't tell you how badly I wanted out of there."
- Denver rookie QB John Elway, on Jack Lambert, after Lambert and the Steelers knocked Elway out of his first game as a pro (1983).

by Han on Nov 28, 2011 3:44 PM EST reply actions  

I agree with all of that

Steelers are my second favorite team in the league, but I grew up in CA in the 80’s, when the Niners were the best team in professional sports. Going to that Monday night game, and excited as all hell for it.

As to your rankings, yup. Texans will hold onto the division by virtue of their record, but will lose in January. Raiders will take the West. Steelers in the 5 spot at 12-4, and I just can’t shake the feeling that the Bengals won’t be able to hold onto the last Wild Card. Though it pains me, I am starting to suspect the Jets will find a way to nab it, sadly.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Nov 28, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Crap

Schefter reporting that Polamalu could be out for a while with a head injury.

"He had no teeth, and he was slobbering all over himself. I'm thinking, 'You can have your money back, just get me out of here. Let me go be an accountant." I can't tell you how badly I wanted out of there."
- Denver rookie QB John Elway, on Jack Lambert, after Lambert and the Steelers knocked Elway out of his first game as a pro (1983).

by Han on Nov 28, 2011 4:06 PM EST reply actions  

There goes your season. You guys are a .500 team without him, stats prove it.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Steelers might still make the playoffs but of course have no chance to win the SB

but neither do the Ravens.

"He had no teeth, and he was slobbering all over himself. I'm thinking, 'You can have your money back, just get me out of here. Let me go be an accountant." I can't tell you how badly I wanted out of there."
- Denver rookie QB John Elway, on Jack Lambert, after Lambert and the Steelers knocked Elway out of his first game as a pro (1983).

by Han on Nov 28, 2011 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

stats also proved at one point

that Tom Brady would always carve our defense up.

Stats also prove that Flacco is in fact “average Joe”

This message will self destruct

Who the hell's interrupting my Kung Fu? - Black Dynamite

With two D's, for a double dose of this pimpin'

by FrankWyt on Nov 28, 2011 5:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Average Joe just happens to be an instance where stats don’t lie.

This message will self destruct

Who the hell's interrupting my Kung Fu? - Black Dynamite

With two D's, for a double dose of this pimpin'

by FrankWyt on Nov 28, 2011 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

and at this juncture youre proving his point and ate heartily from the plate that read: trollbait

by klompus on Nov 28, 2011 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

*eating heartily, or *you also ate heartily,

choose your own ending comments

by klompus on Nov 28, 2011 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

well sir

it’s still fun because I know how sensitive he is about Flacco..

This message will self destruct

Who the hell's interrupting my Kung Fu? - Black Dynamite

With two D's, for a double dose of this pimpin'

by FrankWyt on Nov 28, 2011 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes sir!

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

What a crock of shit lol, go look at Flaccid’s stats for THIS SEASON.

The Ravens are pus*ies compared to the Steelers. - Peyton Hillis 2010

by malaki on Nov 28, 2011 6:22 PM EST up reply actions  

2,700 yards, 13 TD’s, 8 ints. I’ll take it right now. Still bitter over that sweep babe?

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

You forgot to mention his completion percentage

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

And his QB rating

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

8 wins?

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 7:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Alex Smith has 9

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Smith > Ben I guess then.

Flacco has to trust his receivers to make catches, but shouldn’t throw towards coverage. He needs to attack deep more often, but shouldn’t hold onto the ball so long. He needs to show more awareness in the pocket and move to extend plays, but nothing good comes of him leaving the pocket. He should run with the ball if nobody’s open, but he definitely can’t run with the ball.

Flacco should have the awareness of Roethlisberger, the elusiveness of Vick, the control of the offense of Manning, the leadership of Brady, the accuracy of Brees, and the arm strength of … Flacco? - Ampallang

by Mr MaLoR on Nov 28, 2011 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

By your arguments, he is

Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
-Napoleon Bonaparte

There’s a lot of stuff we wouldn’t have to clean up if the city provided basic human rights, like a Port-A-Potty.
-OWS Protester

Cornell University Class of 2014

by LV Steelers Fan on Nov 28, 2011 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not baseball, it's a team sport

Wins are a part of It. I want to see comebacks,3rd down efficiency, and intangibles.

By that I would rank for this year at present:
Rogers
Brady
Brees
Ben
Dalton
Romo
Flacco
Manning
Bradford
Te ow yes tebow

Impose your will.

by ALDOG on Nov 28, 2011 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Wins are a team stat. I don’t get to worked up either way over regular season wins & losses, that’s for the pretenders not the contenders.

The Ravens are pus*ies compared to the Steelers. - Peyton Hillis 2010

by malaki on Dec 3, 2011 7:45 AM EST up reply actions  

I heard it's a very mild concussion.

"I’ll consider myself a dirty player when my mom calls me a dirty player." - Ndamukong Suh

by Riddlah. on Nov 28, 2011 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Your all time Steeler regret?
5467103_small
Hines Ward: a different look part 1. Hines vs. the big boys.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Isaac Redman 2012: Should we temper our expectations?
Photo_small
Worry Warts
6-trophies_small
The Saint Will Be The Starter for 2012 - The Whole Season.
Trophies_small
Why Is Rashard Mendenhall Still On This Roster?
2009-week6_1440x900_benroethlisberger_small
Pads - To wear or not to wear
Small
53 Man Roster (Way too early edition)
Small
WHEN DO TICKETS GO ON SALE?
Small
Submitted for your approval: Steeler names for this year's pledge class
Small
The biggest offseason ever

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo