The Devolution of a Great American Game
For those of you whose heads have nearly exploded over current events involving Harrison, Ben and others, the following might carry you over the top. I also must warn you that we may also delve into the dangerous topics of politics, religion, economics, human psychology and, possibly sex and race. I apologize in advance, and if that doesn’t work I’ll blame Mechem.
On the website Steeler Depot, Dave Bryan published a piece pointing out that the NFL was selling photos of Colt McCoy in the immediate aftermath of the hit that he suffered from Harrison, and of Ben at just the moment that Scott Paxson’s body threatened to snap his ankle like a twig. Now, if you’re having trouble following this let me rephrase; while James Harrison sits home with the rest of us on Monday night because he has been judged to have committed crimes against humanity so foul that he must be removed from the field and forfeit his salary for the week, the NFL attempted to profit from his actions. I say "attempted", because, Bryan pointed out at the end of his piece, once busted NFL.com removed the photos; an admission of guilt I would say. Nor is this the first time that we’ve been down this particular road. Last year, Harrison was fined for a hit he put on Cleveland receiver Mohammed Massaquoi (Why do these incidents always involve Cleveland?) judged to be beyond the pale. The NFL sold photos of that hit as well; so this constitutes a repeat offense. However, so far no word about fines or suspensions of the parties involved. There is a popular term that captures the essence of this situation:
C’mon man!
Look, before moving forward let me say that I get the safety concerns. In fact, I think I get the safety concerns better than a lot of people do. I know that fining and suspending Harrison and the others isn’t going to do jack about the very real safety concerns that the NFL needs to address. But it’s good PR. The crazy, inconsistent dynamics involved in this process begins to make a least a bit of sense when you realize that this isn’t really about safety at all. It’s about money.
Let’s be honest, professional football is a tough, difficult, very physically demanding exercise. Arguably, maybe it is too violent a game for a civilized and moral society to tolerate; and believe me, that debate is just around the corner. And because of the size and the speed of the athletes involved, the game may be more dangerous now than it has ever been. We have managed to keep the human wreckage that the game produces more or less on the down low, as the saying goes, but the truth is catching up. The death of players like Mike Webster, Andre Waters and John Mackey tell a very disturbing tale and the physical and mental disabilities of numerous former players, still living is something, like the proverbial sausage factory you don’t want to look at too closely. This involves not only the demands on the field of play, but also the drug and other abuses that players wrestle with to make it on, or to stay on that field of play. All of this makes for a very difficult conversation. It’s a particular difficult conversation because at the core it is moral. And in spite of love for moralistic posturing, morality is not one of our strengths as a nation right now.
An acquaintance, a Roman Catholic who is from India told me the following story about Mahatma Gandhi. Though a practicing Hindu, Gandhi was well acquainted with Christianity and the Bible. He was asked once if he had ever considered becoming a Christian. Gandhi’s response was that he had never met one. A wise guy type of remark to be sure, but it speaks to a brutal truth as well. There really aren’t very many moral people out there, and especially in positions of power. So the response by the league to the complex and difficult issue of how they begin to wean themselves away from some of the more toxic practices that endanger the well-being of their players is to scapegoat James Harrison and his ilk; a move that is on its face is ridiculous, but appears bold and groundbreaking to people who aren’t accustomed to thinking too deeply about things. Most importantly, the money just keeps on coming in. The television contracts have just been renewed and as the item that began this piece demonstrates and just paying casual attention to the sports shows will reveal, beating up Harrison has become a revenue stream in and of itself.
I would love to simply conclude that this is part of some vast conspiracy to screw Steeler Nation. I do believe that if the league continues down its current path, both in terms of the safety issue and its practices in general that the Steelers, their players and fans will suffer disproportionately. The forces aligned opposite are not so much evil, I prefer the term wicked, as in twisted. The values that drive them are very different from that of the Rooneys even though they are in the same business and, on the surface, are pursuing similar goals. Money, particularly large amounts of money changes everything. Think of turning on a light outside on a summer’s night and the kind of creatures it attracts. They will come, they must come, it is the nature of things. I’m talking about players, management, owners, the media, sponsors and, in some cases, even fans. They have no particular love for the game beyond what the game can do to advance their own narcissistic ambitions. To these ends they will milk the game, if necessary bleed it, and finally slaughter it to achieve what they desire. Organizations like the Steelers, the Giants, the Packers, perhaps a few others nurtured and built this game when the rewards for doing so weren’t nearly so attractive, or should I say seductive. Their relationship and perspective is rather different. And it explains to an extent why all three of the franchises mentioned are experiencing great success relative to the others.
Have you ever really thought about why the respect for the Rooneys is so great?
Earlier this year I had the honor and privilege to sit down and speak with long time Steeler personnel man and scout Bill Nunn. During the course of the conversation he said two things about Dan Rooney that was obvious and stunning. 1) He was one of the few billionaires in Pittsburgh, and 2) he still lived in the house on the North Side in which he grew up. What gave the statement greater impact is that we were sitting on back porch of the house that Nunn had grown up in, which was located in Pittsburgh’s Hill District; Nunn being one of the longest tenured managers in this multi-billion dollar institution that is the NFL. Different values. The Rooney family is that great rarity, moral men and women whose morality is reflected in how they conduct their business, especially how they treat their employees and customers (more or less strict adherence to the Golden Rule within the necessary parameters of operating a successful business), and the greatest telltale sign of moral leadership; humility. It is a testimony to the level of cultural bankruptcy that we are enduring that when we are exposed to this uncommon phenomenon we are overjoyed and amazed. It also puts the lie to the notion that right action must be sacrificed in order to achieve success. This is the propaganda of the con artists, scoundrels and crooks that have slithered their way to the top. To the contrary, the Steelers organization demonstrates consistently that right action is actually essential to long term success.
This is why the Steelers model for success is not easily replicated. Potential imitators are unfamiliar with the methods and the values behind them, and in any case have no confidence in them. They don’t understand the concept of sharing their practice facility with the local university Division I football team (and letting them use their stadium for its home games). They don’t understand why they would weather the inconvenience, criticism and additional expense of making their game field available to local high school teams for playoff games. They don’t understand that by trying to keep ticket prices affordable to the average fan, by treating their head coaches more like tenured professors than hired hands, by taking the cafeteria servers to Super Bowls, by paying for the hospital bills, college tuition and business startups of former players, and, most important of all, by knowing and staying faithful to their business (football) that the Steelers organization enjoys a level of success that is unprecedented in any business.
So what do you do if you can’t beat them or join them? You legislate against them. You change the game to something that is unfamiliar to real football people. In doing so you cannot help but to expose your core values which are warped, distorted and not a little crazy. They would be naturally offensive to Steeler Nation who immediately understands that they also run counter to our interests. You’ve heard the term culture war to describe goings on in the larger culture, but this is, in fact, what is going on here, low level of course. And if you want to know where we end up if we continue to follow their lead, all you need to do is see what happened to Pittsburgh and most of the upper Midwest in the last 30 years; the ‘why’ of the Diaspora. The Steelers have come to represent the best values of our community properly understood and applied. They have been and continue to be under attack by the corrosive effects of greed and the wrong- headed thinking that it spawns. The need that they are trying to satisfy cannot be sated. No amount of money can fulfill the need to be loved by self and by others. So what will happen is that the corporate concerns, the moral pigmies and those fans simply seeking casual entertainment will squeeze everything out of the NFL until there is nothing left. Then they will discard the broken carcass and move on to the next entertainment.
A word about Harrison.
The popular criticism is to insist that James change his ways and to disparage the fact that he isn’t taking this matter ‘seriously’. But what if he can’t, by that I mean what if doing so strips him of precisely those qualities that make him a great player? Another part of that conversation I had with Nunn, who if you remember made his money evaluating talent, is that he expressed some concern about the over coaching of individuals whose gifts were best expressed by not thinking. The term most commonly used is ‘instinctual’ which I think is a primitive and crude explanation for what we now know as kinesthetic intelligence. The principle is that the body has its own methods of learning that are not connected to verbal, intellectual methods. Think about how you learned to walk. Or even better, learning to ride a bicycle. Now, if you were trying to teach a friend how to ride a bike would you sit them down in a classroom and lecture them on balance and rhythm or would you take them out, put them on a bike, and have their bodies learn by trial and error?
We are now asking players like Harrison (and Troy, and others) to either slow themselves down by thinking (verbalizing) and mute their gifts, or undergo a retraining regimen to, hopefully, successfully reeducate their bodies, both of these paths are pretty problematic. In addition, we are operating under the false premise that who is predator and who is prey is a static value. The question when confronted by athletes such as Ben, Michael Vick, Cam Newton and Tim Tebow is not always how do you bring them down, but whether you can bring them down at all.
This opens up the moral question of the selective application of protections involving head to head contact. How can head to head contact be a grave safety matter in the case of some players, but of no matter at all to others? How can you, for example, exclude running backs that arguably have the shortest shelf life of any category of player in the league due to the tremendous level of physical abuse inherent to the position? Are we now saying that we have a class of elites and another class of cannon fodder and drones? Remember, Harrison missed a number of games this year due to the results of head to head contact not initiated by him. No penalties, fines or suspensions involved.
Bottom line, this process has not been thought through, nor structured in such a way that players, coaches and fans can feel confident that the process is being legislated in an even handed manner. In the meantime the process will skew against the Steelers because they insist on actually playing football rather than rough touch.
Is there a solution? In my view the safety piece is one of several trends that are destroying the game. My solution would be to make Dan Rooney NFL commissioner. Now wouldn’t that be a vast improvement?
62 comments
|
Add comment
|
15 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This
this process has not been thought through, nor structured in such a way that players, coaches and fans can feel confident that the process is being legislated in an even handed manner.
My main complaint is that there is not even a thinly-veiled attempt to be even-handed. Goodell and the U.S. Constitution have never met.
Rec’d.
Gerela's Gorillas are here for the show
and so is Franco's Army
It's been many years in coming
just watch that Steeler machinery humming!
by GoldMetalDefense on Dec 16, 2011 8:30 PM EST reply actions
Agree with this but little else
This is a valid criticism of the NFL and Goodell, but it’s only true as far as it goes. Safety is paramount, and imperfect policing of play to promote safety is better than no policing at all. Everyone in Steelers fandom is pointing to no-calls for other teams, but the critique is misplaced: the no-calls are wrong, not the calls on Harrison.
The rest of the article speaks of a bias against the morally superior Steelers organization. I would no sooner take anything from the Rooneys and their enterprise than I’d question Waaten Buffet’s similar acumen in his business and humility in performing it. However, the claim that such virtue and concomitant success makes the Steelers a target by the wicked, jealous and hypocritical NFL is just silly. In every other sport the most valuable teams carry much power in the league (think Yankees, Red Sox, Lakers and Celtics). And this is rational, since they generate more money, so they carry more clout. The same is true in football, where only a few teams have the influential owner the Steelers do—one that can add affirmative action to the leagues coach hiring processes, or can assure the ascendency of one certain and current commissioner.
Of course, there is no proof of overt bias against the Steelers in policy or real-time ref calls. To be sure, a visit to Ravens or Bengals blogs would highlight all the favorable calls that the Steelers have “obviously” received because of their owner and august history. There is a brilliant behavioral economist, Daniel Kahnemann, whose work on cognitive bias would be a useful working theory to disabuse those claiming, even subtly and indirectly, that there is systematic bias against the Steelers. No evidence for this exists, and no one who has so unscientifically gathered and analyzed his data can ever show otherwise, which is the point, isn’t it?
Like politicians and preachers that prefer to speak qualitatively in order to spin stories and selectively cite evidence to maintain a worldview at odds with the facts, so that they can maintain the dubious idea that the worst Republican is better than the best Democrat, or Christians are morally superior to Muslims, so too do NFL fans like to forget their team’s warts (e.g., the Steelers of the 70’s abused steroids when everyone knew the dangers, that the Browns knew McCoy had a concussion but let him go back in anyway) in order to paint the seductive but false image of their team as that sacrificial lamb.
It is time to be honest and recognize that the Steelers are more analogous to the Yankees than the Rays, and that the inconsistent policing of dangerous hits is attributable to human imperfection, including faulty organization and process, but mostly the unbelievable challenges of making calls in real time. To insinuate otherwise is to become an irrational conspiracy theorist who is short on scientific facts and long on cognitive biases.
A final thought. It is insulting to argue that James or Troy are incapable of change or that they think less on the field than other players. They are fully capable of integrating the new rules into the set of limits of play, just like any other athlete. If the choose not to, claiming unproven bias by the refs, or because they are young and cocky and minimize the long-term risks of their behavior -another cognitive bias-then they have only themselves to blame when their playing ting has been cut short. This, by the way, was pretty much the message and commentary supplied by Mike Timlin—presumably with the Rooneys’ blessing—following release of news of James’ sanction. The Steelers are showing not just class but a strong grasp of reality in making such a statement.
by ec on Dec 18, 2011 11:10 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I have to disagree with some of what you are saying
You begin by stating that safety is paramount and that imperfect policing is better than no policing at all.
Has there ever been a time when safety wasn’t a concern? Some critics would argue that if safety were paramount the game wouldn’t be played at all. And, given what we know about what has happened to the health of former players over the years, what we continue to learn in terms of what the impact of even minor, seemingly inconsequential blows to the head can have to long term health, and the evolution in the size and speed of those who play the game, they have a point. What is at issue is what constitutes adequate player safety today.
To say that imperfect policing is better than no policing at all suggests that there is or has been a time when the game has not been policed at all. The game officials are the police and they have always been there. There are degrees of imperfect policing and a perception that things are trending in the wrong direction.
If, as the piece points out, the league actually believes that safety is paramount and that Harrison’s actions are a violation of a magnitude worthy of fines and suspensions then the fact that the league has sought to realize a financial gain on the images of those violations are disturbing. If management knew of this practice then they are hypocrites. If they didn’t know then their competency comes into question. Either way it doesn’t engender much confidence in their judgments or methods. Fairness and competency may not be paramount but they are nonetheless, pretty damn important to the covenants that govern any collective undertaking. Corrupt policing is worst than no policing at all because it contradicts what the rules are trying to achieve and calls into question the very integrity of the
organization. And precisely the kinds of biases, talk of conspiracies and the like begin to come into play because what the authorities say they are trying to accomplish make no sense.
It makes no sense to treat an alleged violent act as abhorrent and then to glorify and profit on that act. It makes even less sense to (safety being paramount) to have rules on head to head contact that only apply to some players. And remember, under a previous definition of what constituted safety, a definition that was in place less than two years ago, all of the actions discussed would have been considered both legal and ethical (not a violation of the rules). Harrison is not the only person who appears confused over what now constitutes right and wrong. But he is one of the few people who is being punished for his confusion.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Dec 18, 2011 3:03 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Meant to rec this
Looks like it flagged it somehow.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 19, 2011 7:37 PM EST up reply actions
Of the many great things I have witnessed you write here - this is the best, most insightful piece
You have touched eloquently on many of the subjects that have me so distraught over this suspension. This suspension is the tipping point in the game. From here on out, the game will be in a tailspin; how quickly will the game devolve? I don’t know, but I think within the next decade it will be a very different game and I do not think I will still be a football fan at the end of that 10 year cycle. Contemplating this has made me sad and also a bit angry. I find it both funny and infuriating at the same time to have Ravens fans here trying to sell me a different version of events – how can they be so short sighed when their team was built in the Steelers image? Don’t they realize it is just a matter of time before the NFL is camped out on their lawn peeing on their bushes? I am also not sure how much longer I will continue to participate in this site as I get too irritated by the inane nonsense people spout without the least of insight or thought. The worst part for me is that it seems the folks with the least thought into the subject matter are the quickest to call everyone else stupid and I simply am losing the desire to play the game.
There are a lot of very talented writers here and you are among the best, it is a pleasure to read something that is insightful and well thought out, kudos for the level you bring, it is appreciated.
Rec’d.
"My mentality is singular in that I want to be world champs each and every year, so that's what we work toward. I have a tough time acknowledging levels of success short of that. That's just how I'm wired." - Mike Tomlin
by MDSTEELERSFAN on Dec 16, 2011 8:35 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
Thanks
And I hope you don’t leave the site too soon. I follow your comments and agree with most if not all of them. I enjoy the company.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Dec 16, 2011 8:42 PM EST up reply actions
Appreciate the feedback very much, I take that as a huge compliment coming from you
my problem is that I get too “riled up” by the chuckle heads and I get pulled into conversations I should avoid, just can’t help myself. I think the point is coming soon just as it did for me and Facebook where I reevaluate what I am getting out of it. The answer was nothing in that situation, but it was a serious time vampire and as I can’t stop myself from commenting when something gets under my skin, the safer bet is for me to take myself out of the equation. Anyway, I really love the Steelers, so I probably won’t be able to stay away (not that I am trying to make false “threats”, just that I might not be able to resist coming here, especially when this is the level of contribution from the writers here).
"My mentality is singular in that I want to be world champs each and every year, so that's what we work toward. I have a tough time acknowledging levels of success short of that. That's just how I'm wired." - Mike Tomlin
by MDSTEELERSFAN on Dec 16, 2011 8:54 PM EST up reply actions
hey md
I remember you calming me down once. It was right after the first game of the season against the Ravens. A slight madhouse happened here on BTSC in the days after the game. I was in a shouting match on here with some Raven’s fans, you even made a one reply, if I remember correctly, advising me on how to handle myself around Trollers and our own Gremlins, that has served me well.
I appreciated and still appreciate it. Since then, I have really only gotten into it once, and that was with an inhouse gremlin or at least someone who was having a bad night online. This was also after a loss to the Ravens.
I have learned some things on here, and not all of it has been bout the Steelers. Don’t let a bad night, a few bad apples or someone Trolling, keep you from enjoying this Site. Anymore, I don’t let Trollers piss me off with their luring comments, now, I just like to slam em with a smile on my face.
So, stick around MD,
by steeler fever on Dec 16, 2011 9:16 PM EST up reply actions
you contribution is appreciated. Sometimes it posts, without me pushing the button!
by steeler fever on Dec 16, 2011 9:18 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks Fever, I know where you are coming from, I just don't want to become the person that irritates me while interacting with the chukleheads
"My mentality is singular in that I want to be world champs each and every year, so that's what we work toward. I have a tough time acknowledging levels of success short of that. That's just how I'm wired." - Mike Tomlin
by MDSTEELERSFAN on Dec 17, 2011 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
Don't feed the Trolls
the absolute best method to get rid of the trollers is to completely ignore them. I used to be the same way and immediately fire back a response ; now I never reply, and when no one else does either, the troller disappears. Like magic !
" I think this is probably the best team ever assembled. They talk about the Vince Lombardi Era, but I think the Chuck Noll Era is even greater. " - Mel Blount
by michaelbro8 on Dec 17, 2011 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
I'd miss your poasts...
…and hope you reconsider not coming.
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
by PaVaSteeler on Dec 16, 2011 10:05 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks PaVa, it's not something I want to do, just something that I might need to do, we'll see what happens
"My mentality is singular in that I want to be world champs each and every year, so that's what we work toward. I have a tough time acknowledging levels of success short of that. That's just how I'm wired." - Mike Tomlin
by MDSTEELERSFAN on Dec 17, 2011 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
MD. I can’t say we know each other well, but I am aware of your contribution to this site (by your comments, honestly I have no idea if you’ve made posts). But for you to bail would suck to me. As is obvious to anyone here, I get “riled up” sometimes as well. It’s normal among people I know personally. I get pulled in to conversations I should avoid as well. There are times I feel like I can’t help myself, just like you. And I’m definitely guilty of going too far at times, and I let things get under my skin that I probably shouldn’t.
But..that’s who you are, and there isn’t a damn thing wrong with it. If you were one of those people that appeared to be one way all the time, and it was always the “right way” you’d be very suspect. I could give you many examples that would “prove” my point from my personal experiences if you were interested, but I wouldn’t do it here, out of respect for everyone else on this site.
You mention Facebook. While I agree with you wholeheartedly on what a person actually gets out of that site, I can’t agree with you associating it with this site. This site is full of analysis that I would actually consider “expert” analysis, as opposed to the people I keep getting told are experts (most ESPN personalities) It is full of thoughtful, intelligent people as well. (not just the writers, but a large majority of people that just post comments) It’s not a bunch of people letting you know when they use the bathroom, or take their kids to the park.
The worst part for me is that it seems the folks with the least thought into the subject matter are the quickest to call everyone else stupid and I simply am losing the desire to play the game.
Yes, that is true, but you can’t let stupid people ruin your enjoyment of things. (I only say this because I found myself guilty of this in the last few years, I know you are older, and in all likelihood wiser, but sometimes it takes someone giving you a different perspective on things)
Just for an example. I used to hate certain bands. It wasn’t because they weren’t good, it was because the people I came in contact with that were huge fans of them, were ALL douche bags.
I let them affect my enjoyment of certain things. I’m glad that I got around that. (with help from a friend that has a way of breaking things down, and helping me see things from a different perspective, that I often find to be a better way to view it)
That may sound irrelevant, but I feel like it relates to your comments in this thread.
I’d hate to see you go, but I’d hate even more for you to go because of the type of BS you are talking about. You’re a good dude (from our limited contact, but I’d like to think I’m a good judge of character)
Anyway, I am going to end this ramble, as it feels like I’ve gone on too long. I’ll know for sure after I post. (I don’t preview, that’s for sissies, lol). But I do hope you stick around.
Boy, I'm three generations deep, in gangstadom
Thanks Frank appreciate it
"My mentality is singular in that I want to be world champs each and every year, so that's what we work toward. I have a tough time acknowledging levels of success short of that. That's just how I'm wired." - Mike Tomlin
by MDSTEELERSFAN on Dec 17, 2011 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
MD
I just replied to your comment on the FanPost that I wrote a couple of days ago. I would just echo what alot of the others are. No need to just stay away just because of some fools. I know where you’re coming from. In fact, my first post on the site was the big RB analysis, which I think is still on the left side of the main page. The reason I wrote that was because of some smack talk from a Cowboys fan about how great Emmitt Smith was.
I will also add though that I used to be a lot more active on the site than I have been over the last year or so. A big reason has been how busy my new job has kept me for the last year and a half. But, I still have been able to make it back to follow the articles, and every so often, I am able to get back into the conversations. I guess what I’m trying to say is, even if you slow down or take a break, you can still come back. You may not recognize a lot of the names if you are out of the loop for a few months, but that’s ok.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 17, 2011 5:18 PM EST up reply actions
I understand what you are saying WP
Not sure how I am going to end up handling things, but right now I am highly irritated and have already been spending less time on here.
I also want to apologize for creating such a large sidebar on such a fabulous post, my discussion should be here, it is detracting from the great work by Ivan Cole (RickVa) – so again, my apologies.
"My mentality is singular in that I want to be world champs each and every year, so that's what we work toward. I have a tough time acknowledging levels of success short of that. That's just how I'm wired." - Mike Tomlin
by MDSTEELERSFAN on Dec 19, 2011 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
10 Out of 10
Excellent, thoughtful and thought provoking article. Where to start?
But it’s good PR. The crazy, inconsistent dynamics involved in this process begins to make a least a bit of sense when you realize that this isn’t really about safety at all.
That kind of took up my reaction to the James Harrison suspension.
But your analysis is much, much more profound.
Arguably, maybe it is too violent a game for a civilized and moral society to tolerate; and believe me, that debate is just around the corner. And because of the size and the speed of the athletes involved, the game may be more dangerous now than it has ever been.
I think you’re right about the coming debate. I have a friend in Baltimore who said, “Thank God my son decided to stop playing football.” The kid was 12.
At the end of that day you hit the nail on the head. Today’s athletes are bigger, stronger, and faster. Most of the answers are counter intuitive. I believe it was Homer J. who said in a comment a while back, “the answer is to make better helmets, as that only gives more incentive to use as a projectile.”
Let me throw a little caution to the win, and give kudos to Ed Bouchette, yes, Ed Bouchette. A few weeks back he asked rhetorically on PG Plus, and then the regular PG – “What if the NFL had the same on the field mortality rate that NASCAR has?”
He wasn’t trying to minimize the importance of protecting against head trauma, but he was talking about some glaring contradictions in our sports society.
They have no particular love for the game beyond what the game can do to advance their own narcissistic ambitions. To these ends they will milk the game, if necessary bleed it, and finally slaughter it to achieve what they desire.
Thank God the NFL requires a Super Majority to change league policy. Prior to the last CBA (the 2005/6 one) Bob Labriola wrote about how a cabal of NFL owners, the Jerry Jones and Daniel Snyders, basically were making a play to abolish revenue sharing.
While my understanding is that the NFL actually strengthened it in the last go around, this is a topic that will come back.
by taking the cafeteria servers to Super Bowls
Man, that is pure class. Not surprising, but pure class.
Another part of that conversation I had with Nunn, who if you remember made his money evaluating talent, is that he expressed some concern about the over coaching of individuals whose gifts were best expressed by not thinking.
This is so true. It is one of the reasons why I don’t clamor for Tomlin/Arians/Fuller to “force” Ben to get rid of the ball faster. Franco Harris apparently had a rough training camp his rookie year. But when he got into his first pre-season game, the hole he was supposed to run through wasn’t there, so he cut back and ran something like 97 years.
According to The Ones Who Hit the Hardest (I think it was there), Chuck Noll walked over to Dick Hoak and said, “Don’t over coach this kid.”
I think that was (one) of the problems with Tommy Maddox. Again, Labriola (not the most objective Steelers commentator) wrote before the 2003 season about the dangers of trying to “coach” Maddox to throw fewer picks. His argument was that in Bradshaw’s best year, he thew almost as many picks as TD’s.
While I think you make a valid point about James, I will say that I am not too worried about this, at least from a helmet-to-helmet stand point.
Why? Because it hasn’t been an issue so far this year.
This opens up the moral question of the selective application of protections involving head to head contact. How can head to head contact be a grave safety matter in the case of some players, but of no matter at all to others? How can you, for example, exclude running backs that arguably have the shortest shelf life of any category of player in the league due to the tremendous level of physical abuse inherent to the position?
You know, I didn’t know that helmet-to-helmet contact was allowed on open field runners until this McCoy incident. That is insane.
Excellent article. Keep it up.
by Hombre de Acero on Dec 16, 2011 8:42 PM EST reply actions
Wow
That was a great shot at Cincinnati. I’ve been a life long masochistic Bengals fan all my life, and all I can say is it’s all true. Mike Brown managed to achieve two things in Cincinnati: perpetuate bad football for over two decades, and at the same time, accomplishing a total disconnect with his fan base. It’s an atrocity, and probably why I now own a Pouncey jersey that I wear every Sunday.
Nice article, BTW. I agree with you 100%
by Maualuga's Revenge on Dec 16, 2011 9:28 PM EST reply actions
A fine and thoughtful piece, that should be taken up by the "mainstream" media, but won't...
In the weeks and months from now during which this issue rages on, here is a litmus test to use when analyzing the statements and actions of the League, and the majority of owners who now control it. This litmus test is based on Ivan’s well written paragraph concerning the Rooneys: (a fragment of which is highlighted here:
Potential imitators are unfamiliar with the methods and the values behind them, and in any case have no confidence in them.
Does a 5 year veteran of the team (whose owner has spoken or participated in a League action of which you are analyzing) act surprised if said owner waits in line in the cafeteria for his turn at selecting a lunch, then proceeds to sit at a randomly selected table?
If the answer is yes, the player would be surprised, then you have identified an owner who is out of touch with the culture of his team, with the true nature of ownership, and is most likely on the side of owners such as Snyder, Jones, and their ilk (who I collectively refer to as “Snyderites”). As I wrote elsewhere, it is this “new wave” of owner who are pushing out the previous generation of owners, the founding fathers, and in doing so are steering this sport away from its roots, from the essence of the game of professional football, and the formula that made the NFL what it is today.
It is these Snyderites that created the myth that the concern of the League is to improve player safety. If this myth were true, then why has a proposed rule outlawing the Offensive Lineman’s ability to “chop block” not been accepted? Why does the League allow players to wear a helmet that is superior in protecting heads against concussions, only on a case-by-case basis?
It appears that the League’s actions against Harrison are but playing lip service to the concept of improving player safety, for the interpretation of the rules, as haphazardly amended after week 6 of 2010, only concern a supposed “defenseless” player such as a QB or WR, which should more accurately be defined as “rating generating players”.
If you have any thought of doubting that phrase
as haphazardly amended, then ask yourself why there is continuing debate over the definition of “a catch”.
The revenue generating players are receiving increased protection, because the League is only interested in television ratings; when they increase, the cost of commercials during games increases, ultimately generating more revenue for the owners (and yes, the players as well).
I have not expressed myself here nearly as well as I would like (and trying to follow Ivan’s piece is beyond my skill set), because in all honesty, my cynicism over the the League’s actions recently is causing a pessimistic bile to rise in my throat.
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
by PaVaSteeler on Dec 16, 2011 9:37 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Of course the NFL is all about the money. Its hard for me to think of many things in this country that aren’t. They all want more, more, more. Just like eveyone else! That to me is a given. Its hard for me to fault the NFL for what every other corporation here in the US is doing.
What irritates me is the hypocrisy of how the NFL is conducting itself in the way fines and suspension are handed out. Do fines and suspension need to be handed out, YES. Does the way it is currently being implemented, appear dictorial in its application, YES.
I want the Rooneys, running the Steelers, not the NFL! With that being said, a review process for fines and suspension needs to be conducted by someone independent of both the players and the owners.
Right now, the fines and suspensions, plus the questionable and inconsistent calls the gameday offical are making, is driving one long time NFL fan, to mostly only watch the Steelers play anymore.
I fully expect all H2H to be banned from the league during the next offseason. I can live with this, I don’t have to have unconcious players, carried from the field, to enjoy Pro football. I can definitely live with no more H2H shots by players. That should be encouraged and I can live with fines and suspension to bring that about.
Just one thing NFL, MAKE IT TRANSPARENT! and have every fine and suspension reviewed independently, making sure every ruling follows agreed upon guidelines.
Solid work
And thanks for articulating the discrepancy between those who receive H2H protection and those who do not. Important point to note because as you really point out, it impossible to behave morally without adhering to principles. If the principle is compassion, then there wouldn’t be this discrepancy…because of the lack of principled decision making, they’re protecting the elites as you identify them in a shameful way.
But that is the price we pay for our Bread and Circus.
I guess the question for each to ask of themselves is, are you a fan or a consumer? Because it is more business than ever….

But you keep pulling out your "refs-threw-the-game" card if that’s what you need for catharsis. You can use that card after every loss. It is a lifetime pass. Get it laminated. -Maryrose
Culture War
….this post is just bloody spot on….nothing i say will enhance this piece, rather quite possibly, detract from it….very well done!!
by Ghost of Bad Ma'afala on Dec 16, 2011 10:39 PM EST reply actions
Fantastical
Great post here. You hit every nail on its head and I loved every word here.
Sadly, you’re right. It’s about the money, always has been and always will be. The NFL produces a hell of a lot of cash and it’s taking the steps necessary to preserve that cash flow.
I think from a business perspective, the whole Harrison thing DOES make some sense. The typical sheeple won’t question it, and will label him a thug and a crook and a dirty player, which most people have already done.
But at the end of the day, truly great business owners, managers, and executives alike KNOW that taking care of your employees AND your consumers is the #1 key to success. The Rooney’s have done this since day one, and so have other great teams like the Packers.
Goodell is an assmongering dickweed that doesn’t understand this. He’s not in any way a great owner. He thinks about the here and now, and doesn’t understand that real intelligent people can see what he’s up to. Instead of really changing the game in an honest and clear way, he’s simply manipulating it at will and frustrating everybody involved.
Honestly I’m fine with a lot of the rule changes and adjustments. I prefer hard hitting defense, but I’m all for protecting players and clarifying certain things. But Goodell has no brain when it comes to consistency, impartialism, and most importantly transparency.
Fantastic post -
a very great deal to think about.
"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin
by Rebecca Rollett on Dec 16, 2011 11:35 PM EST reply actions
So insightful
I think you covered the whole spectrum of the individual forces that are at play in this situation.
Things can always be worse....
Excellet post.
Bottom line, this process has not been thought through, nor structured in such a way that players, coaches and fans can feel confident that the process is being legislated in an even handed manner. In the meantime the process will skew against the Steelers because they insist on actually playing football rather than rough touch.
You know, it might be a little easier to swallow the crap the commish is shoveling if it weren’t for the ridiculous calls we’ve seen and not seen. There’s just no way that you can conclude that roger is being even handed and fair. It really does appear to a reasonable person that he is trying to screw the Steelers.
1 James Harrison’s hit in Buffalo last year that cost the Steelers 15 yards and a 1st down and Harrison a fine? That shouldn’t have been flagged, along with a couple others. The whole beginning of this against cleveland last year was a farce. Ok Harrison gets flagged legitimately sometimes, crap happens! Nobody’s perfect. Every good defensive player is right up against that line. That’s what flags are for and yes they hurt!
2 James himself getting knocked out for 4 games with a head shot. It was fun for all the Harrison Haters to yell KARMA! It wasn’t so fun for me to bash my head against the wall numerous times.
3 The violence against Ben last year and still this year is really disturbing. At least seymour was tossed for his cowardly sucker punch. Really how many times have you seen that happen in a game to a starting QB though? That is beyond the pale and exactly the kind of thing that should result in a huge fine and suspension. Instead, since Ben was judged by the media and goodell and others, DICK seymour decides he’s gonna be a tough guy and knock Ben down. That’ll show him! Just to make me even more crazy, this scumbag was a repeat offender, punching someone else this year. He didn’t get suspended. Explain that one goodell.
Of course even worse was ngata’s judo chop that broke Ben’s nose. Millions of people saw the blood streaming out of our QB’s nose. No flag and pretty low fine the next week. I’m sure the bounty more than covered that. It would have been more had Ben not come back and helped engineer a win. Number 7’s road white was stained with blood all night. And the delicious irony of Harrison being sat for a hit in a game where Ben’s ankle was sprained and we might not have him for a key road game.

Also the strip sack TD at the beginning of the Steelers ravens playoff game last year. Suggz’s hands were all over Ben’s helmet. That should of been a 15 yard penalty, not a TD! It wasn’t the first or last time he got away with that. Maybe not the best rule since it’s gone now but it was there last year!
4. Let’s not forget Ben’s September vacation last year. I know I won’t forget that he’s the first player ever suspended by the league for nothing but the accusations of a drunk liar. Yes I know for sure she’s a liar because she was caught with a fake ID.
I don’t believe there’s an anti Steelers bias for the nefarious purpose of screwing our team. But I do believe that Steeler’s football and Harrison in particular has been targeted as a scapegoat in a pathetic attempt at something. It’s not entirely clear what that something is but it has something to do with the media and lawyers and insurance. Which goes back to one of the best parts of the post.
Money, particularly large amounts of money changes everything. Think of turning on a light outside on a summer’s night and the kind of creatures it attracts.
So what will happen is that the corporate concerns, the moral pigmies and those fans simply seeking casual entertainment will squeeze everything out of the NFL until there is nothing left. Then they will discard the broken carcass and move on to the next entertainment.
Yeah maybe that’s why they have Madonna as the halftime show at the Superbowl this year. Because you know most football fans love Madonna! To quote James Harrison: “LOL!!!”
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
Franco Harris:
"If I had to choose today between the moral integrity and character of Joe Paterno and the politicians and commentators criticizing him, I would pick Joe Paterno, hands down, no contest every time."
Great Piece
I am so glad that there are so many of us coming out and talking about the larger problem we see here.
It’s not just about Harrison. It’s not even about the Steelers per se. It’s about demolishing an approach to football that the Steelers represent. We are not the only franchise that plays the game this way, and my friends who are Ravens fans increasingly say to me: yes, we see what’s happening. They say: we see the league’s hypocrisy and greed, the inconsistency of who is protected and who is not, the promotion of the league’s pretty boys, the pettiness and litigiousness of the officiatin, and the banning of physicality.
The Steelers are only going to be the first target here, maybe we are hardest to take down, due to the influence and reputation of the Rooneys. We’re not going to be the only targets on this, but we’re Gondor in this fight and Roger Goodell is effing Sauron.
by Steelzombie on Dec 17, 2011 1:39 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd. Right on the money....
….as usual.
I would kill everyone in this room for a drop of sweet beer.
- Homer J. Simpson
AMEN!
I have been reading here at BHTSC for awhile now, but just signed up, and about to leave my 1st comment. BEST DAMN ARTICLE I HAVE READ in the past few years!!!! The Chief is smiling down on this one. It has been, and will continue to be VERY FRUSTRATING with all of these acts of nonsense on the STEELERS! BUT, it is articles like this that take you away from all that anger and disappointment to reflect on all the pride and HIGHLY COVETED GREATNESS that surrounds " The Greatest Organization " in sports history, The Pittsburgh Steelers. This is exactly why 0-16, I’m STILL A STEELER!!!!
" I'M NOT A THIEF....... I'M A STEELER!!! and In It 4 LIFE!!!!!! "
Welcome sir. Glad to have you here (I’m nobody here, so i guess I’m out of line saying that) But…the more the better. I looked at your profile and noticed that you are a Spurs fan. Can I ask how that came about? (I too am a Spurs fan, and so is one of BTSC’s most respected members)
I’m not asking to question you, just to see if our reasons are similar.
Either way, welcome to BTSC!
Boy, I'm three generations deep, in gangstadom
I am a spurs fan too...
Welcome Kane.
by One4theotherthumb on Dec 17, 2011 6:24 AM EST up reply actions
If you don’t mind (and this is not to question anything) can you tell me how that came to be?
Boy, I'm three generations deep, in gangstadom
I am a singer
I went to college at UTSA in San Antonio and used to sing the National Anthem at their games.. I had the fortune of meeting David Robinson, Dennis Rodman, and Sean Elliot a few times. Nice guys and they all did so much for the city there. (even Dennis…his whole image is manufactured) I became a Steeler fan when at the age of 6 they took on Dallas in the Super Bowl of 75. By that ripe old age, I had enough of “America’s Team” being force fed daily. I adopted the Steelers, they won, and i have been a fan since.
by One4theotherthumb on Dec 17, 2011 6:42 AM EST up reply actions
and used to sing the National Anthem at their games
I had the fortune of meeting David Robinson, Dennis Rodman, and Sean Elliot a few times.
What? Are you trying to make me jealous? Damn…you’re a lucky man.
Robinson is probably the biggest reason I became a Spurs fan. (that and they just happened to be on TBS/TNT almost every time I was able to watch NBA games when I was around 9 or ten years old) Elliot was definitely a childhood hero of mine as well.
As far as Rodman, I could never confirm it, but I’ve always “knew” that his image was manufactured. I never held it against him either. I am originally from the Detroit area, and a lot of my family are Pistons fans (so, I’ve always had love for them) and I remember him from those days. I have never questioned his character though. I’ve always liked him as a player, and as a person (judging by what I’ve gathered of course, not like I know him)
Since you offered your reason of becoming a Steeler fan, I will offer mine. My step dad hated sports, my mom has always been partial to Detroit, so she “likes” Detroit teams, as well as musicians that come from there, but she didn’t really care. My step dad was from northeast Ohio, and spent a lot of time in western Pennsylvania. He had a friend that would visit from time to time, and he loved football, and loved the Steelers. Being a young child, and him being the only person in my life at the time that shared the passion for sport that I did, and was willing to sit with me and watch a game (unheard of to me), I liked what he liked. He eventually broke down why they were the best organization in pro sports, and none of his reasons were related to “4 super bowls…herpdederp”, and it stuck.
Been a fan ever since. And while it’s not necessarily the reason I became a Spurs fan, as I got older, I realized, the Spurs are the Steelers of the NBA. (or the Steelers are the Spurs of the NFL)
Ok, with that out of the way, you said “I am a singer”
Any way you can tell me what you do in those regards?
Boy, I'm three generations deep, in gangstadom
Gladly, but I would rather do it privately
I do not want to take over the thread here, if you understand what I mean. drop me an email, and I will gladly share what I do. prestoncoe@yahoo.com
by One4theotherthumb on Dec 17, 2011 7:32 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks for this article
Well thought out, and thought provoking. I am still amazed how a non-football player was put in the position where he can:
a. change the rules of the game
b. judge the rules of the game
c. Interpret the rules of the game
d. enforce the rules of the game
Goodell is the judge, jury, executioner, and enforcer of it all, and without playing a down of football. I would like to see the SOB line up opposite of Harrison to demonstrate the proper hitting techniques to be employed. It is amazing to me that he has anything to do with the sport. It is like hiring someone as police chief who has never walked a beat.
by One4theotherthumb on Dec 17, 2011 6:22 AM EST reply actions
It seems to me like there are many, many "fans" who know more about tackling than the 2008 Defensive Player of the Year and author of the Greatest Play in Superbowl History.
The hubris of these fools is laughable.
"It was an attrition football game and you know we like that."
Franco Harris:
"If I had to choose today between the moral integrity and character of Joe Paterno and the politicians and commentators criticizing him, I would pick Joe Paterno, hands down, no contest every time."
Are there other pictures of hits by players on other teams?
Ivan,
Just curious to know if the NFL has posted any pictures of players from other teams getting hit like the “Harrison collection?”
It would be interesting if they never posted any other hits, just Harrisons. That should say volumes.
good question
By the time I checked out nfl.com myself the pictures mentioned in the post had already been removed. Bryan showed the pictures from nfl.com in his post, however. I have no idea what else that they removed, but there was only one picture displayed from the game with the Browns. I agree that it would be a useful path of investigation. The general fact that the league doesn’t appear to be on the same page, whether we’re talking about game officials or the official website does speak volumes. Under these conditions why should be taken seriously. And why are their mistakes worthy of similar, public punishment?
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Dec 17, 2011 11:20 AM EST up reply actions
Is this disturbing to anyone in lieu of the pictures the NFL posted of Harrisons hits?*
*Rave-ons trolls need not reply.
Ivan,
After checking a number of their photos, about 20 pages worth, I found this one to be of interest. All other similar ones show tackles on the ball carrier, but not this.
This one seems to be like a hunter posing over his kill.

Wrong facemask and wrong skin tone
it’s Ben
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Lloyd, Andy Russell, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene, Curtis Martin, Willie Roaf, Andre Reed and Jerry Kramer
"Back in my day we killed five hookers and thought nothing of it" Craig James
by WVPiratesfan on Dec 17, 2011 7:01 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks 21
I think you’ve made the point.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Dec 17, 2011 12:27 PM EST up reply actions
Best article I've read
on this subject on this or any other site…simply outstanding writing and perspective….thanks for providing us with your insights…
"I don't want to see anyone injured, but I'm not opposed to hurting anyone" - James Harrison
by LifelongSteelerFanInVa on Dec 17, 2011 12:48 PM EST reply actions
Great piece
Let’s be honest, professional football is a tough, difficult, very physically demanding exercise. Arguably, maybe it is too violent a game for a civilized and moral society to tolerate; and believe me, that debate is just around the corner
I had visions of a Supreme Court debate where the existence of the NFL hangs in the balance. Are we at the tip of the iceberg as far as the civilized/moral/safety debate? I can see a slew of lawsuits against the NFL until one day it gets taken from us altogether….and we’ll
move on to the next entertainment.
Similar to the days the gladiators ended. Society looks back on that with such incredulity….will it look back on the NFL the same way?
"I think the beard will decide when the time is right to come back. It will know when the time is right and all of a sudden appear." -The Deisel
Excellent work Ivan! One of the best pieces I've ever read on this site.
I completely agree with everything you said about the direction of the NFL and what’s behind it. But I don’t agree concerning James Harrison—even though he’s one of my favorite Steeler players.
I seriously doubt that James Harrison would be any less of a great player if he decided to stop using his helmet as a weapon. Harrison is a man who makes conscious, willful decisions, not some snarling animal acting chiefly on instinct.
So if we’re going to talk about morality, doing things the right way, and the Rooneys, why not carry through on this theme and accept that there’s no place in pro football for intentional efforts to injure other players. Football has been equated with warfare but, after all, it’s only a game. Beating the other guy on the scoreboard should be reward enough; we don’t need to knock him into next week.
If we’re truly horrified by the physical toll that a football career takes on players, then how can we not say that Harrison needs to wise up and play by the rules?
I don’t think Harrison is intentionally using his helmet as a weapon in the way that you do. For all that the pundits have said that he “lowered his head and drove his helmet into McCoy’s facemask,” I didn’t see that when I looked at the play. The forehead area of the helmet is not the crown of the helmet.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 17, 2011 5:49 PM EST up reply actions
But what are the rules?
Really. We keep having people being fined for plays that aren’t penalized meaning the grasp of the officiating crews is shaky at best. Tomlin had to go to New York for clarification meaning coaches across the league are not clear. NFL.com is not clear meaning league management is not clear. Responsible leadership would say ‘Time out’ and make sure that every single facet of the profession was on the same page, particularly since it directly contradicts approved play in the past, the very recent past. The proper time, the best time would have been during last off season, but owners and management decided to playing games with the lockout trying game the players into give backs (again greed). There was no time for the teams to get a complete understanding and make corrections in training and preparation. The lack of clarity in both the understanding of the rules and their enforcement (Think the second Ravens game and the difference in punishment leveled against Clark as opposed to Lewis) should be on the league, not on the players.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Dec 17, 2011 4:42 PM EST reply actions
Pushed the wrong button, sorry.
If we are truly horrified about the violence, then what about the player who broke Harrison’s face, or more precisely, why are only horrified with violence committed against certain players? Is Harrison the only player that needs to wise up? And what the Hell is the justification (sorry this bs riles me up) that one player has to bear the professional and financial burden so that other players ‘get the message’?
OMG I wish I were a lawyer.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Dec 17, 2011 4:48 PM EST reply actions
And one more thing
How do you define ‘intent’? If Isaac Redman decides on a particular play that he is going to run over a tackler as opposed to trying to avoid contact and the tackler as a result suffers an injury. Does that constitute intent? Conversely, if Redman continues to struggle when contact is made, and other players pile on, bend Redman backwards and break his leg, does that rise to the level of intent? In other words a very slippery slope, and quite frankly you could argue that there is intent to injure on every single play in every single game. The injury rate in the NFL is 100%.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Dec 17, 2011 5:02 PM EST reply actions
I’d say intent to hurt, maybe not injure. To cause pain, and force your will, and wear down your opponent is part of the game. I know Harrison has stated he intends to hurt people but not to injure them. I agree with 100% of your comments and article for that matter and had brought up the play Harrison was injured on as well to show the silliness of there judgement. I’d also have to bring up instances like Richard Seymour punching people, between plays, in plain view and how that is much worse to the NFL image and that SEymour is still suiting up for his team. Even though the toughest team in all facets usually wins, the league doesn’t want it that way and intend to get it their way at the expense of the game, the true game, because the newer owners think that way will lead to more money. No more old school owners are walking through the doors, these owners are liars and crooks and would step on their grandmothers back to get a dollar. No more class left like the Rooneys and they can’t change things themselves. The best days of football are in the past, and now a new sport will eventually rise out of what used to be the NFL, it will be something else other than football being played and that sucks.
The fact that NFL officiating is poor and unbalanced is irrelevant.
This doesn’t excuse any player for breaking the rules. No, Harrison isn’t the only player who needs to wise up, but he’s the one with a target painted on his back because of what he’s done and said in the past. He also claims that he’s not responsible for his own actions on the field and some fans are actually buying into that. As for the legal definition of “intent,” I suppose Harrison could claim insanity, which has been defined as doing something the same way repeatedly and expecting a different result.
Great article
It seems like you said everything that I was trying to say in my FanPost, but you said it better and expounded on it in philosophical ways that were thoughtful and profound.
Rec’d
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 17, 2011 5:45 PM EST reply actions
The discussion in your post was part of the inspiration for this piece
BTW, Nice to see hanging out in these parts Wolfpack, always nice to see a familiar alias ; )
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Dec 17, 2011 7:29 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks RickVa
Glad I could have some impact to inspire such eloquence.
And, it’s nice to be back more. This week I’ve probably commented more on here than I had for over a year. :)
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Dec 17, 2011 7:52 PM EST up reply actions
Wonderful piece, thank you!!
And this from ESPN:
“STEELERS LB HARRISON TAKES ISSUE WITH NO-CALL ON COWBOYS’ HIT
NFL.com
Published: December 18, 2011 at 2:19 AM
Though Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker James Harrison did not have a stake in Saturday night’s game between the Dallas Cowboys and Tampa Bay Buccaneers , the recently suspended defender found reason to protest one play.
With two minutes remaining in the fourth quarter, Cowboys safety Abram Elam lowered his shoulder into the chest of Buccaneers wide receiver Micheal Spurlock as the ball sailed by. No penalty was called on the play.
Harrison, whose one-game suspension for his helmet-to-helmet hit on Browns quarterback Colt McCoy was upheld Friday, took to Twitter to voice his displeasure with the lack of a penalty.
“Wow! I guess it is just us!” Harrison tweeted after the hit.
Fellow Steelers linebacker James Farrior chimed in to say the same.
Harrison used his Twitter account earlier in the week to voice his displeasure with the league’s decision to deny his appeal. On Friday, he tweeted , “17 games,1000+ snaps, 100+ tackles, 12+sacks and 2 forces fumbles since my last incident and I get a suspension for a football play!”
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. For more info, please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com
by Fifty-Eight on Dec 18, 2011 4:07 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Besides what you typed there, I watched about 5 minutes of the game tonight. Jenkins (can’t remember his first name) was guilty of not one, but two h2h hits. Just in that very limited time I watched the game. No flag, and I could all but guarantee no suspension is coming, despite the fact that just tonight, he has equaled the amount of h2h violations that Harrison has since the witch hunt began.
Awesome huh?
Boy, I'm three generations deep, in gangstadom
Great view point!
I would agree that they have 2 standards on the field and that makes for a broken game. Roger goodel is hoping that someday a basketball game breaks out on the football field with little regard to defenses .
As for the safety issue there are players with out pads or mouth pieces. The pads seem smaller across the board- just look at the pics of the teams of the 70- 80’s. If the commissioner was truly interested in player safety then these issues should be rectified. Make mouth pieces and appropriate pads mandatory. Improve the helmet- by the way there is a better helmet out there.
The NFL is messing with the gad atrial success of the past 50 years. I for one don’t want to see a basket ball game, nor do I want an arena football type of pace to the game. Contact is a part of the sport and yes I dont agree with Harrison’s suspension. It was his first of the season and clearly had happened in a football moment. What is lacking is consistency in the league since goodel took over. There is no uniformity amongst the refs, nor is there any in looking at hits. I believe this to be one of the worst seasons of officiating and management from the commissioners office.
The owners and the players along with the fans have control over all of this. And for the record the new CBA is doing more to hurt these players by not getting them football ready – lack of contact.
The real question is what do we do?
Impose your will.

by 

































