Opponent Spotlight: Browns QB Seneca Wallace
As Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported, Browns QB Colt McCoy was not cleared to practice Wednesday, which is likely an indicator Seneca Wallace will get his third straight start, this time in Week 17 vs. Pittsburgh.
As Steelers FS Ryan Clark said this week, Wallace is comparable, even better, than McCoy, but the Browns are a team in which little difference exists from one quarterback to another.
McCoy is mobile and has the toughness to stand up to an incoming hit and complete a pass. The hit from James Harrison that sent him to the bench after Week 14 is a testament to that.
Wallace looked, at times, noticeably better than McCoy in terms of vision and efficiency. There are other times he seems to have a general lack of focus, most notably, the decision to call a running play instead of spiking the ball at Baltimore's 5-yard line at the end of the first half. The clock drained down to zero without even a field goal attempt.
Cleveland lost 20-14, and a slew of other failed opportunities plagued them as much as Wallace's poor decision, but the difference between winning and losing can oftentimes be found in those kinds of things.
It's in decision-making, and that's likely the part of Wallace's game Browns head coach Pat Shurmur and his staff will work on with him this week.
There's a good example of this in Cleveland's 20-17 loss at Arizona in Week 15.
The Browns have the ball up 7-0 with 12:20 left in the second quarter. It's 1st-and-10 from Arizona's 38-yard line.
Wallace is lined up in shotgun with twins on each side of him. Cleveland had moved the ball well to this point in the game, mostly around Wallace's one-look-and-release passing. He completed 7-of-10 passes for 67 yards, and only one of his misses were not decently thrown balls.
Cleveland was looking for a big play, and had a good play call set up. Attacking rookie CB Patrick Peterson and S Adrian Wilson (yellow circles), WRs Mohammad Massaquoi (outside) and Greg Little (inside) are on the left.
Massaquoi runs two steps, and cuts back sharply back to Wallace. Wallace pumps a pass to Massaquoi, who's hands are up, selling the idea of a short pass. This freezes Peterson (yellow circle), who's in zone.
Meanwhile, Little runs a wheel route right over Peterson, and is in a perfect position to catch a pass at the first down marker, if Wallace delivers a hard throw. It would likely have gotten to Little before Wilson, who was shading toward the middle of the field and out of the camera shot, could have made it. And that's assuming Wallace just went for the first down. He had time in the pocket, he had a chance to hit Little in the end zone, where Little would have had single coverage from Wilson.
Wallace checks off the designed read of the play, and looks back to his right. He throws incomplete to WR Jordan Norwood, who's blanketed (yellow circle) by CB Richard Marshall.
It's not so much that it was a bad decision, it's that Wallace had a chance to make a play and he elected not to try. He could have gone to the end zone to challenge a safety who's somewhat out of position (which is what the play was designed to do) or he could have thrown a hard spiral at a spot where Little was wide open, and at least gotten the first down. This team averages 13 points a game, and its mentality really should be more aggressive. At that point, Cleveland's defense was playing well, and they had a lead.
After that play, Wallace threw two more incompletions, and the Browns settled for a field goal. After his 7-for-10 start, he finished 11-for-21 for 159 yards, but he did throw a touchdown pass.
In his last start of the 2011 season, and against a better secondary than he saw in Arizona, Wallace won't have as many opportunities to make big plays. If Cleveland will have any chance, though, Wallace needs to step up and take a few chances.
Baltimore identified Wallace's hesitance and played very physical with their receivers at the line. They gambled with a lot of single coverage, and it paid off. They held Wallace to just 4.2 yards per pass - a rare situation in which a team rushes for a better average (4.5 yards per carry) than passing.
Look for Pittsburgh to do much of the same. Wallace can make plays with his feet, but if he can do it with his arm, he doesn't seem to think he can. The Steelers will bring lots of pressure, and will need to be convinced Wallace and the non-playmakers the Browns have at their receiver positions can beat them down the field.
12 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If Woodley sits out, as he should...
…then I worry whether we can bring sufficient pressure on Wallace, as you describe. Further, if we give their receivers as much room as we gave the Rams’ receivers, I think we’re buying trouble. Granted, Wallace is not Brady, but given how both the Niners’ Smith, and the Rams QB were able to move the ball, plus add Hollis’ ability to run, and I think the Browns are going to give us a lot more game than we might otherwise expect, especially if their defense comes to play against Batch.
I’m nervous about this game, and the possible implications it represents. I’m more concerned about keeping the healthy Steelers healthy, and allowing those injured to rest. A loss won’t bother me unless the Ravens lose also.
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
"pressure" is achieved lots of different ways
Their offense is very quick; receivers don’t run deep routes, and of the 30+ passes of his I watched, he went with Option No. 2 maybe three times. He drops back and gets rid of the ball. Won’t take many sacks.
Plus, they saw the St. Louis game. If Woodley isn’t playing (doesn’t seem like he will), they’re gonna go after Worilds land, air and sea.
I would think the Steelers will employ a lot of run blitzes, which is basically using Timmons and Farrior (Troy even) closer at the line, and attacking the gaps between the defensive linemen. Move Worilds around here and there on running downs, maybe even stunt he and Timmons.
They can get pressure still if it happens to be a pass, but they want to push runs back toward Harrison and away from Worilds. That’s gonna be the key Sunday.
by Neal Coolong on Dec 29, 2011 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
I have confidence in Lebeau
He runs many variances from the 4-3 and moves his personnel around. Worilds will be just fine. I think we under-rate his progress. Lebeau will accentuate his positives. Bet on it. The pressure that we need is from Casey up the middle – and we are not getting that. I am more concerned that they have Pouncey and Ben in the lineup. There must be some incentives in Ben’s contract if he gets “4000 yards”. It makes no sense in risking damage to his ankle or that of Pouncey. Essex did okay against the Rams. give him another shot at it. Maybe we have found his niche. We should just keep Ben available “only” if the other 2 QB’s go down. If the Ravens win, it would have not been worth the risk.
I classify Wallace in the “savvy vet” category.
He knows what his strengths and limitations are and at times….he can pull out a big upset. On the other hand, he can confuse and confound by poor decision making. Good enough to be a NFL backup QB, but not good enough for prolonged starting.
Still, there’s that “any given Sunday” thing…… That’s why the Steelers cannot rest this game and whoever starts will have to play balls out. Can’t take this game lightly at all.
One good thing in the Steelers favor is that they know he is the starter and in turn, they can game plan for him and the unique things that he does vs McCoy.
That’s exactly why you won’t (shouldn’t) hear Tomlin say anything on point about Roethlisberger playing Sunday. It forces Cleveland to prepare for both Ben and Batch.
QBs in the NFL recently have done very well in replacement QB duty, or even a start the week after a replacement (Hanie, Yates, Painter, Chaz, Ponder, etc.). The key though is when opposing defenses get that film of him in advance. Since the Browns really don’t know right now whether Roethlisberger will start, they have to watch film on both of them. With only so many hours in the day, they’ll be less prepared to handle either of them, which is obviously to Pittsburgh’s advantage.
They can’t play the same game of coy (pun intended) about Colt though, because they handled the issue so poorly when it happened they have to be up front about everything.
by Neal Coolong on Dec 29, 2011 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
In my opinion, Wallace is better than McCoy
He is a “savvy vet”, but we have many savvy defensemen – and a "savvy DC. He (Lebeau) will have them up to the task. They all know what is at stake,
Maybe so, but I just do not think that McCoy is a good QB
And, playing with this Cleveland team, he or no-one else will look good. I really don’t think he wants to be there. Who could blame him – after what they did.
From what I've seen of Greg Little as a receiver,
Wallace might have realized that, even had he thrown the pass to him, there’s a better than 50% chance he’d have dropped the ball. I don’t have the stats but Little has dropped a ton of passes this year, and a number of them were in clutch situations.
I hadn't considered that
Good thought. That’s really unfortunate, though, because he’s gotta make that throw anyway. While we don’t get to see exactly where Wilson is, you can see in the film where he ends up, and piece the rest together. My judgement is he could have made a good throw and beat Wilson.
The thing that confirms to me the throw was supposed to be 10-12 yards was the fact Little looked back at Wallace when he was about five yards into his route. If he’s running a deep wheel, he wouldn’t have looked so early.
by Neal Coolong on Dec 29, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions

by 






































