Why the Steelers Should Win
The pundits, bookmakers, and former players have made the Packers the favorite in this Superbowl matchup but I think they are wrong for many reasons:
1. The Steelers beat the Packers last year and this year's Packers are not dramatically different from last year's (even with the improvement of Aaron Rodgers).
2. The Steelers beat the Packers last year WITHOUT TROY POLAMALU. In last year's matchup, Tyrone Carter filled in for Troy. Any real Steeler fan knows that Carter is not even in the same zip code as Troy in terms of athletic ability, understanding of the game, playmaking ability and so on. Yet, Steelers still beat the Packers.
3. The fast surface/dome stadium. The media thinks that this will benefit the Packers' receivers. WRONG! Picture Mike Wallace, Antonio Brown and Emmanuel Sanders on a fast turf. These guys have speed to burn. At worst, the receivers are even.
4. Green Bay has shown that they are vulnerable when it comes to covering tight ends. Heath Miller should have a good/great game. Even Spaeth might earn some valuable yards.
5. Rashard Mendenhall: Green Bay's rush defense is ranked 18th in the NFL. Green Bay gave up 1,838 rushing yards on defense, that is 834 more rushing yards than the Steelers defense gave up.
6. Even though the Packer's pass defense is ranked higher than the Steelers pass defense, the Steelers only gave up 200 more passing yards than the Packer's defense. So I will say the difference is not that great.
7. Special Teams. For once, the Steelers special teams would not be overmatched. Green Bay's Special Teams are not superior to the Steelers'. At worst, it would be an even matchup.
8. Pass Rush: Deebo and Woodley will get to Aaron Rodgers. Even though they only sacked Rodgers once last year, this time around, they will be more aggressive in their rush, knowing that they have Troy in the secondary.
9. One hard hit on Aaron Rodgers. I don't wish injury on anyone but with his history of concussions, one hard hit could make Rodgers gun-shy or knock him out of the game. Big Ben can absorb hits better than Aaron Rodgers.
10. The Steelers have some trick plays involving a non-quarterback passing the ball. Green Bay will get burned by one or more of such plays. Mark my word!
11. The Steelers have Isaac Redman and the Packers do not!
BTW, I think Pouncey will start (but may not finish) but the Steelers will play more 4 receiver sets to help. Steelers can run or pass out of this formation.
85 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rose colored glasses...
1.) You are right that the personel is not that diffrent but you are way off in terms of how they are playing. The D last year was in the first year of the 3-4. The Packers are leaps and bounds better in year two. The guys (Matthews, Raji) were rookies last year and have become much better this year.
2.) Spot on.
3.) Yes your guys are fast. Our reciving core is tallented. This is for sure edge Packers. Its not even that close.
4.) In the playoffs they have been very good covering the TE. Will it continue? Who knows but so far so good.
5.) Spot on.
6.) The Packers D backs are much better than the steelers. This is not close.
7.) At best it is even. This is weak for both teams, I say edge Packers because TM is punting very well and Crosby is shakey but has experience.
8.) Spot on, but the Packers have had two weeks to plan for it.
You know
that the Steelers have the number one pass defense in the league when you look at passing yards per attempt and not per game and if you add in yards lost from sacks its even better? Johnny_S did the stat not too long ago if you want I’ll find it for you. So its much closer than you think.
The WRs are much closer than you think too. I think Ike can handle Jennings, the rest of the guys just have to keep from getting beat deep.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
I didnt know that.
Thats a great stat. I dont think that the Steelers D backs are bad, just that they are going to be able to handle GBs on turf.
I didn't know either
Most people just see the yards per game and just assume the backs are terrible. But once you add in the fact that teams elect to pass on the Steelers more because of the run defense is so stingy, the Steelers have had huge leads in several games this year which makes the offense have to pass and the defense backs off, that contributes to the high passing yards per game.
But the Steelers D allow the fewest points per passing attempts in the NFL and that alludes to the greater fact that the passing D is very effective most of the time. The team does a great job in limiting the deep throw and allows QBs to get the short to intermediate pass.
Like I said I worry about the speed of your WRs because the only fast CB we really have is Ike and he will be on Jennings all game. I’m not to worried about Driver, he isn’t fast enough to give BMac issues. I’m worried about the other two, Jones and Nelson are very fast can run past Gay or Clark. I wouldn’t be surprised if we see BMac and Ike in man coverage and put gay in a zone with Troy lurking over the top.
GB on turf is a tough challenge I agree. But I liken it to the Saints on turf. The d held up well in that game and if miller doesn’t fumble we can come through with the win. I just don’t see the 30 point game we had last year. Troy makes a big difference to this team.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions
Whats your thoughts on...
MW and Troy? From what I have seen they havent played up to their usually high level in the playoffs. Is it that Troy hasnt been 100% and MW has been doubled or have teams figured something out?
Well
I think with Troy its a combination of his role being adjusted for the Playoffs and the injury.
People always tend to freak out when Troy isn’t making visible amazing plays. But sometimes Lebeau will just use him as a decoy. Timmons will be the roamer then, this is usually evident because Timmons will get a ton of tackles when they use this scheme. In the divisional round Timmons had 8 total tackles and in the Conference Championship Timmons had 10 total tackles. When Troy is the roamer we’ve seen Timmons numbers dip a bit. Troy in this scheme is taking away the deep ball is more away from the line. Since QBs usually don’t want to test him it won’t be visible that he had any effect in the game. But that usually makes the QB hold on an extra split second which is very valuable to our defense, so in a sense you can say he always affect the game, its just not visible sometimes.
I think his injury though has prevented him from making those all out explosive plays. I think though with the two weeks to heal he should be to his normal self and we should see that extra gear that makes troy so special.
As for MW, we all must remember he is still only a second year player and isn’t a complete player yet at the WR position. He is still getting better at the route running and is playing against better defenses who are looking for the deep ball. I’ll look for them to try some short stuff to him to get the defense creeping up. Plus Ben has gone to wallace deep once in each of the previous two games and under thrown him both times. Otherwise he gets a TD. So if Ben can time it right, expect MW to catch a deep ball, I haven’t seen anyone as fast as he is.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions
Anytime
here to help. I always like GB sans Farve, and am a big fan of AR. If we lose Sunday I won’t feel bad about it, I’ll be disappointed of course but it wouldn’t be like losing to the Cardinals or the Seahawks in the SB. I do believe if the Steelers bring their A game they should win.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 4:06 PM EST up reply actions
Here goes the post
so you can tell i’m not bluffing. There are two parts.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 2:54 PM EST up reply actions
I'll say that
GB defense is not slouch either, they are easily the 2nd best defense in the league this year.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
What? How did my wife get on here?
Thats not what I ment and you know it honey.
I would like to point out that this year the Steelers only faced 1 top ten passing offense and that was the Saints. The Pats were 11th. The Steelers put up good numbers but its not like they were facing the top end of passing attacks.
That's what I wanted to point out
One top 10 rated pass offense all season. You would expect to be rated high
so the defense is better
because of inferior competition, i’ll take that, thats a great point. We’ll see how they do.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 3:49 PM EST up reply actions
If it is not what you meant, you should not have worded it so stupidly. Our WRs are fast and talented.
I would like to point out that this year the Steelers only faced 1 top ten passing offense and that was the Saints. The Pats were 11th. The Steelers put up good numbers but its not like they were facing the top end of passing attacks.
I can see how this would make our WRs less talented. Wait…
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 3:47 PM EST up reply actions
Also
I would like to point out that your pass offense has played 0 of the top 5 pass defenses. The Steelers have played 2 of the top 3 (can’t play themselves).
By the way, I am going by yards per attempt, because yards per game is a pointless stat.
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 3:51 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Clearly...
Otherwise you couldnt make your point.
Do you really want me to break down why yards per game is pointless?
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
Nope...
I get it. Anyone can take stats and use them to make their point. I am sure your stats are right, but I dont feel like looking up stats and using them in unique was to make my point.
You are wrong and now you are back pedaling.
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 3:58 PM EST up reply actions
lol
I already linked your two post above.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 4:00 PM EST up reply actions
Hilarious!
"If I had a dog that looked like you I'd shave its butt and teach it to walk backwards"--Klinger, M*A*S*H
by SaratogaSteelerFan on Feb 2, 2011 9:01 PM EST up reply actions
What am I wrong about?
I just said that the Steelers only played 1 top ten passing team.
P.S. you need to look up what back pedaling is.
thats not what he was referencing to
what got him was
3.) Yes your guys are fast. Our reciving core is tallented. This is for sure edge Packers. Its not even that close.
Which alludes to saying that our WR group is no where near the same talent level that yours are.
I would agree that GB is better because of Jennings, but Wallace is a close second
Driver and Ward cancel each other out
and
Nelson and Jones compared to Brown and Sanders cancel each other out.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
I think...
You are right about the first four guys, but the our last two are much better than your last two. It is probably because we go into four reciver sets so much but I think the advantage is in our depth.
I've seen Nelson and Jones play
both are good, Jones have dropped some easy passes he should have caught. A lot of teams doubt our rookies but they are very talented and they have stepped up greatly. Look at the Stats in the playoffs they have had better games than Wallace and Ward. The opposing fan bases from the Ravens and Jets said the same thing next thing you know 58 yard bomb to Brown and a huge catch from brown in the Jets game.
What really matters though I think is what Nelson and Jones can do against Gay and Madison/Lewis
and what can Brown and Sanders do against Shields and Lee
I honestly think Shields have been playing great and should be able to handle sanders, its brown on lee that might be in favor of the Steelers.
As for us Gay has been playing better but I still think that we will need to protect him against the deep ball, if Lewis could get his head in the game I’d like him against Nelson or Jones but he just doesn’t and I doubt the coaches will trust him in this game. Madison will need help against the deep ball also. This is where troy comes in. This match up worries me the most.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 4:18 PM EST up reply actions
Brown & Sanders will probably be matched with Shields & Collins, not Lee.
Lee would only be out there if you’re in 5 wide, and he’d be on #5.
A.J. Hawk, B.J. Raji, C.J. Wilson, who's next, D.J. Shockley?
What am I wrong about?
That the Steelers only played 1 top 10 passing team. If you look at a stat that has relevance, Y/A, the Steelers played 2 top 10. The Packers played 2 as well.
P.S.- No, I don’t.
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
Also
If you go by QB rating the Steelers played 4 and the Packers played 2.
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
Ohh
Ohh, I didnt see that, you are right then.
What was I back pedaling about? I just said I didnt care. I get that some people love to get into all the stats, but I think it can get boring. If thatts what you like than more power to ya.
As they say, don’t bring a knife to a gun fight.
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 4:10 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Here is a great example
Your pass defense has given up 3107 yards and ours gave up 3425 this year. Therefore, you are giving up less yards per game. However, the Packers pass defense is average so teams run on them a lot more than they do the Steelers. No one can run on the Steelers so they usually give up when it does not work. 3rd and 3? Yeah, they are going to pass.
So, because of that the Steelers have seen 593 pass attempts whereas the Packers have only seen 527. Obviously that completely skews the yards per game but it has no reflection on the Steelers pass defense. Yards per attempt is a better stat because it completely neglects those factors.
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 3:57 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
"However, the Packers pass defense is average so teams run on them a lot more than they do the Steelers."
I hope you mean run defense, or else anything you say is clearly biased.
A.J. Hawk, B.J. Raji, C.J. Wilson, who's next, D.J. Shockley?
I figured
You’ve been nothing but class in your interaction with Packer fans.
A.J. Hawk, B.J. Raji, C.J. Wilson, who's next, D.J. Shockley?
Sarcasm isn't lost on me either
And I would say the same about a couple of the Packers fans I’ve encountered.
by John Stephens on Feb 3, 2011 8:21 AM EST up reply actions
No need to nit pick.
Clearly the WR have tallent or they wouldnt be in the SB. They are just not as tallented as the Packers.
As for the D comment it was about the other covo I was having. It had nothing to do with you. I am sorry I didnt post it above.
Everyone loves...
The grammer police. When all else fails just point out a spelling error
I wouldn’t have pointed it out if it had appeared to be a typo, but you clearly think the word is spelled with 2 Ls.
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions
...and you clearly think it is spelled "grammer"
because you didn’t correct him.
A.J. Hawk, B.J. Raji, C.J. Wilson, who's next, D.J. Shockley?
No, I actually know how to spell.
And I realize that terrible spelling makes your argument look a lot weaker.
by John Stephens on Feb 2, 2011 6:45 PM EST up reply actions
GET 'EM RINGO!
lol
"In Hoc Signo Vinces!" (With this as your standard, you shall have victory!) -Constantine I
the Packers D backs are better than the Steelers? You do understand that D backs include safeties? What safety do the Packer’s have that is even close to Polamalu? The Packers pass Defense was only 200 yards better than the Steelers’ and Polamalu missed two games.
Green Bay receivers had better numbers but remember it was out of necessity because GB had no running game. Also about the performance of Steelers’ receivers, remember that Big Ben missed 4 games, and we played with a 3rd string quarterback for 4 games.
Your receivers dont have the edge.
Yes I know sateies are D backs
There is no one like Troy in football and he will be the best saftey on the feild but the Packers overall are much better. Collins was a probowler and second team all pro, Woodson was a probowler and second team all pro, Tremon williams was a probowler and Sheilds is playing great. This is a no brainer for the Packers.
There is a reason that everyone is saying that the Packers wideouts are better. Its because they are.
And one more thing
We won last year without Pouncey at center. The drop off between Pouncey and Legursky is pretty signficant. But the drop off from Justion Hartwig to Legursky is not that great. You doubt that? Consider this, Hartwig spent the year sofa-surfing while Legursky kept cashing NFL checks while he played in nearly every game and made meaningful contributions up and down the line (and in the backfield too).
So scratch one more supposed Green Bay advantage there.
I dont doubt that your center is better this year.
Is he good enough to not get worked by Raji? Maybe in the run game but not on passing downs. You guys will need to double him. If Pouncey was 100% it would be a great matchup but with him at 80 or your back up the edge goes to Raji.
Yea with pouncey 100%
I wouldn’t worry about Raji, Pouncey made Ngata disappear in the playoff game against the Ravens and Ngata > Raji
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Ngata is better than Raji but they play diffrent...
Raji is very fast. He struggles as a pure run stuffer but he is a beast on passing downs. I think the Steelers need to get up early and run, because if the Packers know they are passing it could be bad news.
Well
our OC has a penchant for being very predictable so Raji will have his chances when he knows Pitt is passing, we’ll see if we can contain him.
"Did you really expect Joe to have it as easy as you think it would be against James "I want to stomp of your children’s testicles" Harrison and Lamar "I’ll kick your grandmother" Woodley? I sure as hell didn’t." - Malor
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 2, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
Did Pittsburgh with the Super Bowl last year without Pouncey?
A.J. Hawk, B.J. Raji, C.J. Wilson, who's next, D.J. Shockley?
We won last year without Pouncey at center.
A.J. Hawk, B.J. Raji, C.J. Wilson, who's next, D.J. Shockley?
He meant we won the game against Green Bay last year without Pouncey at center
by Opinion ate it on Feb 2, 2011 5:56 PM EST up reply actions
great point manDarino. Also, on special teams, Antonio Brown can hurt Green Bay in the punt or kick return. The Steelers’ punter and kicker will be so happy to be kicking in a dome and on turf instead of the Heinz Field grass (if you want to call it grass). So, the Steelers might have a slight edge in special teams.
Neither one of these teams is going to be great at ST.
If the Packers can keep Hester in check than I am not worried about Brown on punts. He could do some damage on KR though.
More reasons why the Steelers should win.
9. One hard hit on Aaron Rodgers. I don’t wish injury on anyone but with his history of concussions, one hard hit could make Rodgers gun-shy or worse. Big Ben can absorb hits better than Aaron Rodgers.
10. The Steelers have some trick plays involving a non-quarterback passing the ball. Green Bay will get burned by one or more of such plays. Mark my word!
by Opinion ate it on Feb 2, 2011 3:15 PM EST up reply actions
Funny Fact
I know the people who are contracted to Resod Heinz Field every year, they are a great company. Agro Design, Seville Ohio… the Sod is grown there too… so yes, I can call it grass. Arcadia and Kentucky Bluegrass Sod to be exact.
"Steel lightens your work, brightens your leisure, and widens your world."
"I've gotta a feelin!
Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl!"
The grass thing was a tongue-in-cheek comment.
Appologies to the folks who do the job on the grass. I know that they do a great job with the grass (considering that high school football is played on the same field, and Pitt Panthers play their home games on the same field), the weather conditions, etc. At any rate, the kicker and punter will enjoy kicking in Dallas.
by Opinion ate it on Feb 2, 2011 5:24 PM EST up reply actions
I too was being tongue-in-cheek
Now, nobody go sending these guys hatemail over that Miami game (the mud-pit game)
"Steel lightens your work, brightens your leisure, and widens your world."
"I've gotta a feelin!
Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl!"
The Packers wideouts are not better simply because everyone is saying it. Unbiased football fans know Mike Wallace should have been a probowler but that’s beside the point. It is urban legend that GB receiving corps is better. We have Mike Wallace, Hines Ward, Emmanuel Sanders, Antonio Brown. You guys have more recognizable names: Greg Jennings, Jordy Nelson, James Jones, Donald Driver. Thats about it!
You might be onto something...
You are the only person in America saying this… Steelers against the world! Come on. The Steelers have a fine group of recivers but calling them better than the Packers or even the same is just being a homer.
We heard
these same arguments from the Ravens and Jets, and everyone rated their reiciving corps better than the Steelers also. I don’t know which, if either, team has a better bunch of recievers, but I don’t think this is clearly in favor of GB.
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Feb 2, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions
Well, if you're better than two teams, you must be better than a third.
A.J. Hawk, B.J. Raji, C.J. Wilson, who's next, D.J. Shockley?
Please don't be condescending
I never said that or indicated it, I simply stated that the other two teams also said their reciever corps was better than our rookies, all the pundits agreed. Our rookie recievers were able to help us win those two games in clutch situations, that is fact. I also said I didn’t know if the Steelers or GB recievers were better. I never once even indicated that I thought the Steeler recievers were better.
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Feb 2, 2011 11:08 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, sorry
I emphasized your first sentence in my mind. My fault.
A.J. Hawk, B.J. Raji, C.J. Wilson, who's next, D.J. Shockley?
quite alright
it happens
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Feb 2, 2011 11:40 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting post
But I would say applying last year’s results to this upcoming game is a stretch. Every season is new. Both teams have changed quite a bit.
As a huge Steelers’ fan I am nervous about the game because the Steelers had mediocre to shoddy performances against the Patriots and the Saints. Those two offenses are similar to GB’s (certainly in philosophy and output, if not exactly schematically), but Aaron Rodgers has exceptional mobility; superior to Brees and Brady. We couldn’t pressure either Brees or Brady too much, and the pass routes were there all night for them to sit back and hit. In GB’s case, even if we get in the backfield, Rodgers can elude rushers and make a play.
I know DL made some adjustments for more press coverage after the Pats game, but the Packers receivers are physical as well as fast (unlike NE’s group, who are quick but not really physical). It’s not a good match up for our secondary (Troy will have to be on fire…). Ike Taylor (I think it was Ike) was abused on Holmes’ long TD catch in the AFCC. Holmes is also physical and fast. Rodgers is incredibly accurate and won’t miss many passes to open receivers. He’s no Flacco or Sanchez in that regard. And, he’s much better under a pass-rush than Brady. At least he has been this season.
I think the bottom line is that our defense has less margin for error than GB’s defense has against our offense. And, GB’s defense will likely get pressure on Ben. It’s a good thing he’s great at escaping pressure, because he’s probably going to see a lot of it.
Let’s hope we can get the running game going early and often, let the D rest, and keep GB’s offense off the field. Of course, I think Ben is best clutch QB in the game right now, so if it’s close, with our offense on the field near the end, I’d like our chances. But I’d call it a pretty even match up of teams at this point. Definitely reason to be nervous. That’s why they play the game. Let ‘em go at it and let’s enjoy watching.
I hear your concerns,
but it is hardly fair to say that Ike was “abused” on Holmes TD catch. Ike slipped, allowing Holmes to get away from him, and Clark took too shallow a route and Holmes blew past the last line of defense.
It certainly is a tight match-up, but I’m taking comfort in the fact that the Madden simulation predicts a Steelers win. This is the 7th year they have done it, and in the previous six years it has been right 5 out of 6 times. They predict us being down at the 2 minute warning, Ben hitting Mike Wallace in the end zone, and then Ryan Clark sealing the deal with an interception. Works for me. You can see the figures and watch the simulation here.
"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin
by Rebecca Rollett on Feb 2, 2011 9:09 PM EST up reply actions
I am not simply looking at last year's game.
I also factored in the improvement of Mendenhall as a runner, the improvement of Mike Wallace as a receiver, and the emergence of our rookie widouts, the fact that Troy Will Play, and if Pouncy plays, the upgrade of our starting center. i admit that Green Bay has improved as well but their current tight end is not as good as Jarmichael Finley, and their running game is not as good as last year’s. I admit it is not a slam dunk that the Steelers will win but there are solid reasons why the Steelers should win.
Agreed
That your post was a majority of other points besides comparisons to last year’s game/teams. I should have been more complete; that I only thought Points 1 and 2 were a stretch. And, it’s a good post re: the other points. I can see why the Pack are 3 point favorites. It’s a small number; most folks don’t see too much difference between the teams. But, your post is certainly fair. I’ll still be on edge until 0:00 in the 4th, though :-)
Point Taken.
A neutral observer might call it a push but as a fan I think the Steelers should win.
by Opinion ate it on Feb 2, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions
imitation is the most sincere form of flattery, and it is an honor that GB isnow PGH north
It is a great compliment to the Steeler Way and to Steeltown that the Packer organization realized they had to become Steelrs II to stomp the hated Cowboys and other rivals. They get Steeler coaches (Capers, Kevin Greene). THey get a Pgh native who was a life time Steeler fan as their head coach, They move to our defensive scheme, draft a QB who compares himself to BB, use an off year as an opportunity to draft a top-flite nose tackle in Raji, they use a first found pick to draft a OLB that flies to the QB almost as well as Harrison, they move their super athlete Woodson into the box to play like Troy at times. It is amazing. It is great that the other small market team has done this and that these two small market teams ae the 2 most popular teams in America. All other sports should watch and learn that allowing small markets to compete evenly and fairly is the right thing to do. If we can’t win, I want GB to have the title.
Agree on Wallace and Miller being the offensive keys.
I don’t see the Packers secondary stopping Mike and Heath consistently. Also, I agree we’ll see some gadget plays from Ben & Company.
if it works
it’s a good thing, if it doesn’t it’s a bonehead call…
"I don't want to see anyone injured, but I'm not opposed to hurting anyone" - James Harrison
by LifelongSteelerFanInVa on Feb 3, 2011 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
Execution, right situation, and
Ben making the right read of the D, and even then, it still may blow up. Can be a real drive killer, if for example the gadget involves ARE or someone sweeping across behind Ben, getting the ball, only to have GB stunt blitz to blow it up, or Raji get penetration, and the ball carrier/ARE passer has to go way behind the line to avoid the D, allowing the play to develop way too slowly, and we get a big loss.
it has worked
out for us in a positive way this season
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee

by 






























