Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

The Importance of Shopping at the Corner Market

In the spring of 1981, not many folks were paying attention to the San Francisco 49ers.  Bill Walsh was still unknown and unproven, the team was coming off a 6-10 season and the Vegas odds to win the '81 Super Bowl (which they did), 50-1, were not exactly making people take notice.  One might assume that Walsh was preparing to load up his West Coast Offense in the NFL Draft.  He did the opposite.  Walsh took three defensive backs in the first three rounds of the Draft, one after the other, namely Ronnie Lott, Eric Wright and Carlton Williamson.  He took another corner, Lynn Thomas, in round five.  Within hours he completely revamped his secondary.  Walsh was smart enough to understand that as soon as he unveiled his new offense, it wouldn't take long for film to get around the NFL.  He also knew that 500 miles down Interstate-5 in San Diego, another offensive passing explosion was being deployed, started by Sid Gillman and passed on to Don "Air" Coryell.  People remember Walsh, Montana and the West Coast Offense.  What is little-known is that in 1984, the entire 49ers defensive backfield made the Pro Bowl, the only time that feat has ever been accomplished in NFL history.

Walsh was an assistant coach with the Cincinnati Bengals in 1977 when a monumental rule change would alter the course of the NFL's offensive focal point.  Known as the Mel Blount Rule, after the Steeler's Hall of Fame cornerback, the rule prohibited defensive players from chucking receivers beyond five yards from the line of scrimmage.  Prior to 1977, the passing game took a backseat to the running game in the NFL.  Passing was much less reliable with defensive backs having their way to disrupt pass patterns.  A good passing game complemented the essential running game.  You could score points quickly by passing if you were behind in a game and needed to score often.  After 1977, a good running game complemented an essential passing game.  For those of you old enough, it was like Johnny Carson and sidekick Ed McMahon switching seats on the Tonight Show.  Enter Air Coryell and Walsh's West Coast Offense.  By drafting three defensive backs in 1981, Walsh was wisely stocking up on the antidote before he unleashed the poison.  He knew that he could die by the very sword he would show others how to use.

Sure enough, permutations of the Blount Rule's offspring branched the passing game even further.  Jim Kelly's K-Gun offense and Warren Moon's Run-and-Shoot morphed into Kurt Warner's Greatest Show on Turf and the beat went on.  Meanwhile, as the passing game kept showing new wrinkles, the running game, with no new wrinkles available, declined proportionately.  Moreover, it became critical for the lone back who remained in the offense to be able to catch passes out of the backfield.  Not only did a running back essentially get replaced by an extra receiver, the remaining back was asked to do more receiving.  This is not a knock on the running game.  It comes down to the simple fact that offensive genius lends more options to create new passing innovation than running innovation, which basically can't be improved from Lombardi's power sweep or Noll's trap-block running.  It's the nature of the weaponry.  A tank is a tank.  Give me four airplanes and the sky is the limit (pun intended).

Star-divide

Before I offend good old fashioned Steelers' fans who dream of smash-mouth football, Jerome Bettis running over Urlacher, imposing our will and winning the mud battle, let me state here that it is extremely important for a team in Pennsylvania, playing on the worst surface in the NFL, with crucial Division games in December, to effectively be able to run the ball.  We saw the Steelers eat nine minutes off the clock in the AFC Championship Game before the Jets' offense took the field with a seven-point deficit.  We remember Bettis consuming valuable clock while Peyton Manning stood on the sidelines at the great upset of 2005, and then again with five minutes left in that year's Super Bowl.  An effective running game is invaluable when needing that third-and-short conversion and especially on the goal line.  Make no mistake, I am not suggesting that the Steelers downgrade their running game or the advantages thereof.  To the contrary, the better it is the better we are.

What I am suggesting is that the Steelers take a page from Bill Walsh's 1981 book and stockpile the antidote for their kryptonite.  Having the third-best run defense in modern history will win you a lot of football games against poor-to-good quarterbacks, but it will be very difficult for the Steelers to win another championship against great quarterbacks, with the weakness of their team being just what those great quarterbacks want to face.  The likes of Brady, Manning, Brees and Rodgers couldn't care less about Pittsburgh's legendary run defense.  In fact, they pretty much cry uncle in that category while shredding the secondary at will.  Tom Brady may as well hire a skywriter to fly overhead with a sign that says, "Hey Pittsburgh, we're not going to run and it's not going to matter."  It is no aberration that that last three teams to win the Super Bowl failed to gain 60 yards rushing, an alarming statistic that would make John Facenda roll in his grave.  It pains the smash-mouth purists to think that the last three Super Bowl winners, combined, rushed for the same yardage as Franco Harris did alone in Super Bowl IX.

Since the 2006 NFL Draft, there have been 78 defensive backs chosen in the first and second rounds of those five Drafts.  Thirty-one of the NFL's 32 teams have taken (or traded for) at least one of those players. The lone NFL team not in that mix is the Pittsburgh Steelers.  Twenty-four teams, three-quarters of the league, have selected more than one defensive back in the first two rounds of the last five Drafts.  Moreover, the seven teams selecting just one blue-chip DB have also added a key free agent, something else Pittsburgh has not done (since Ryan Clark).  Interestingly, the two teams with the most of those 78 defensive backs, five apiece, are the New England Patriots and New Orleans Saints.  I guess when you have Tom Brady and Drew Brees, elite quarterbacks in prolific passing offenses, you had better understand the necessity of shielding against your own strategies.

I am not implying that the Steelers have erred with this omission (we have been to a few Super Bowls); though it does stand out when you are the only one of 32.  (It pains me every time I think of the 2007 Draft where the Jets leapfrogged Pittsburgh to grab Derrelle Revis.)  What I am implying is that multiple upgrades are needed, right here and right now.  Maybe not to the extent of Bill Walsh '81, but pretty darn close.  The options are as follows:

  • Re-sign Ivan Taylor.
  • Be confident that Crezdon Butler or Keenan Lewis can become a Tramon Williams-type, who also didn't start in his first three years.
  • Draft a corner or safety in the first two rounds, even if it means moving up to get an impact player.
  • Sign a free agent defensive back who is an upgrade over what we have.

The Troy Polamalu component is another interesting factor in the equation.  To begin with, Polamalu is like an expensive European sports car - beautiful performance when all the parts are in tip-top shape, but anything less renders him a Chevy Malibu.  The stronger the entire defensive backfield, the more the Steelers can absorb a less-than-perfect Troy.  In addition, better cornerbacks allow Polamalu more freedom to use his instincts and make signature plays.  When Troy is busy covering for cornerback shortcomings, his impact is greatly diminished.  The Steelers can add two birds with one stone by upgrading their cornerback situation.  Improving one position actually improves two, by allowing Troy to be Troy.

During last year's offseason, Art Rooney issued two simple mandates to Kevin Colbert and Mike Tomlin - run the ball more efficiently when we have to, and get the young players ready quicker.  The Steelers improved in both those areas.  I'm sure that each of us dreams from time to time that we could be Art Rooney.  I do, and if I were, I would hand the above list to Colbert and Tomlin and tell them to make two or three of the items happen.  Demanding all four is overkill, but I would insist on two or three.  Sure, we have other areas of concern.  The lines on both sides of the ball are always a concern.  But if I am Art Rooney, and maybe someday in some heaven I will be, I am walking around the complex every day with that list above and I am talking to my people about making things happen.  If the Steelers go at it with a hearty degree of resolve, this team will be as good as any to win a Super Bowl in the next couple years.

Comment 40 comments  |  Add comment  |  4 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Great article, but...

Who is this Ivan Taylor that must be resigned?

Greg is offended by the word "Nitschke"

by DwightWhite's Missing Tooth on Mar 2, 2011 10:57 AM EST reply actions  

Ivan is Ikes real name

I'm getting tired of saying this: Dick LeBeau’s system is so complex very few rookies can make an impact.

"It would be tough for me to care less about their opinion, to be honest with you." Mike Tomlin

by Steel in FL on Mar 2, 2011 11:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Did not know that!

I will only refer to him as Ivan from this day forward.

Greg is offended by the word "Nitschke"

by DwightWhite's Missing Tooth on Mar 2, 2011 11:27 AM EST up reply actions  

If you are ever curious about real names

pro-football-reference has them

Evander Ja Mel ‘Ziggy’ Hood
Earl Heath Miller
Burnell Michael Wallace
Uikelotu Christopher Kemoeatu
LeShawn Maurkice Pouncey
etc.

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller

by John Stephens on Mar 2, 2011 12:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I commend you for your knowledge....

You are truly a student of the game and our Steelers. But, I think I will stick with Kemo instead of Uikelotu. Out of curiosity, what is Mike Pouncey’s real name?

by Allen F on Mar 2, 2011 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

MR, I think the Steelers have to come out of this draft with 2 CBs ...

After combine mock draft:

1. DT/DE Muhammad Wilkerson, Temple
2. CB Ras I-Dowling, UVa.
3. LT/RT James Carpenter, Alabama
4. G/RT Clint Boling, Georgia
5. CB Curtis Marsh, Utah
6. NT Chris Neild, WVa.
7. S Byron Maxwell, Clemson

by datruth4life2.0 on Mar 2, 2011 12:56 PM EST reply actions  

Just want to note again

at the risk of offending folks, acknowledging that it’s not clear what the total truth is, not to call out the amazing maryrose (loved your book), but just because it can inform our understanding of the front office and their intentions, that Wexell has reported numerous times that the Steelers would have picked Timmons with Revis on the board because they thought Revis’s cushion got eaten up too quickly. Throwing it out there.

(Also for what it’s worth, Wexell hates Ras-I Dowling. He’s no scout, but been good in the past.)

by syrsteelerfan on Mar 2, 2011 1:34 PM EST reply actions  

reminds me of another common misconception:

that the Steelers would have selected Phil Rivers had the Giants taken Big Ben with their slot.

"We use WhipAss by the case, not the can" - RickVa

by chewiesteeler on Mar 2, 2011 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

So is the misconception that the Steelers badly mis-evaluated the talents of Revis or that perhaps the media mistakenly thought the Steelers didn’t want Revis? Hmmm.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Mar 2, 2011 8:45 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

i figured they would have taken timmons over revis simply cause he is a good linebacker

timmons is a special linebacker and our defense needs that more than a special corner. i have a feeling if they wouldh ave taken revis than we would be whining about how we need an inside backer this draft.

by steelerintexas on Mar 2, 2011 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Greg Jones MSU, Kelvin Sheppard LSU are two LB the Steelers should have on their late boards this draft.

by alistar7 on Mar 2, 2011 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Timmons and Sylvester can play outside, we have no quality depth at ILB.

by alistar7 on Mar 2, 2011 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

if we lose woodley next year or something

any chance we would move timmons to outside and have a young guy rise up in his place at middle backer.

by steelerintexas on Mar 3, 2011 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I think they would try Worlids first, but Timmons or Sylvester would be options if he failed.

We don’t have much depth at ILB though, and having to move either of them outside only makes that situation worse. I expect them to pick up an ILB prospect in this draft, probably late unless they covet Greg Jones.

by alistar7 on Mar 3, 2011 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Who died and Wexell God? He is wrong just as many times as he is right.

The bottom line is the Steelers are pretty good at keeping all of us in the dark until they make their picks.

by datruth4life2.0 on Mar 4, 2011 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Focus of the draft

I know there is a deep draft in talented DBs, but I believe if there is a great talent at OG or OT at the bottom of the first round, we should take him. We can focus on the secondary in the subsequent rounds.

P.S. DO NOT DRAFT ANOTHER LINEBACKER!!!

http://www.theklowntimes.net

by sburks1906 on Mar 2, 2011 3:08 PM EST reply actions  

nice

I especially liked paragraph 5

by IronJake on Mar 2, 2011 4:01 PM EST reply actions  

Great article

I had no clue about the 1981 draft where Walsh drafted DB in the first 3 rounds.

"My rule of life prescribed as an absolutely sacred rite smoking cigars and also the drinking of alcohol before, after and if need be during all meals and in the intervals between them."-Winston Churchill

by cscmember on Mar 2, 2011 5:56 PM EST reply actions  

Great Observation. Also obvious.

It was shown all through the Superbowl that the weakness is the secondary. As pointed out in the article, The Patriots don’t even try to run and have success against the Steelers D. Everyone, or atleast all the smart offensive coordinators will be throwing much more unless/until the Steelers show they can stop it. Stopping the run is HUGE, but not being able to stop the pass this year will cause a lot of headaches, assuming there is a season, which is looking more promising now.

by Zombie Zombie on Mar 2, 2011 6:26 PM EST reply actions  

Same 'ol Patriots

Make note that the Patriots play that way against every team, not just the Steelers. They know their own strengths and weaknesses. Secondly; Lebeau’s defense, by design, often leaves the CBs alone one on one ; if the LB or blitzer doesn’t get there in time, the CB is toast. I don’t know if getting a “shut-down” corner will make that much difference in this case.

6 and counting

by michaelbro8 on Mar 3, 2011 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

DB Coach-Randy Shannon/ ex:Miami Hurricanes HC

Just wanted to say this was a good read….makes alot of sense. As you mentioned,the AFC North is known for smash mouth running and stopping the run. It’s good da Natti and dem Browns didn’t get the message.
I would love for us to get a DB in da 2nd., and later rounds.
I haven’t heard of any prospects for DB coach coming in for interviews,so I will put my vote in for Randy Shannon.He seems to be able to recruit and teach young DB’s who go on to be early round corners.
 I haven’t worked on my mock yet but ….I like.

 G -Mike Pouncey /Fla.

OLB – Dontay Moch / N.Mex

WR -Jeremy Kerley / TCU

RB -Dion Lewis / Pitt
RB -Da’Rel Scott / MD

CB -Rashad Carmichael / VT
CB -Curtis Brown / TX
CB -Brandon-Harris / Mia,Fla
CB -DeMarcus Van Dyke / Mia,Fla
CB -Buster Skrine / Tenn – Chatt

G – Danny Watkins / Bay.
G – John Moffit / Wis.
G – Stephen Schilling / Mich.

DE – Greg Romeus / Pitt
DE - Brandon Bair / Or

FB – Henry Hynoski / Pitt

K - Alex Henery / NE

DT – Stephen Paea / Or St.
DT – Sione FuaStan.

FS – Rahim Moore / UCLA
FS – Chris Conte / Cal

OT – Gabe Carimi / Wis.
OT – Derek Sherrod / Miss.St.
OT – Marcus Cannon - TCU
OT – Jason Pinkston / Pitt
OT – Joseph Barksdale / LSU
OT – Lee Ziemba /AUB

I’m sure some of these guy’s will be coming in for interviews,so I hope we can select a few for our 2011 team. I know we don’t bother with alot of free agents,but I wish we could have Ike #24 and #21 N. Asoughma with #20 Bmac and a #2 rnd.DB

by Al Love on Mar 2, 2011 6:38 PM EST reply actions  

- Draft a corner or safety in the first two rounds, even if it means moving up to get an impact player.

-Sign a free agent defensive back who is an upgrade over what we have.

CB in the 2nd and a FA (Nnamdi, rare FA worth the pursuit to the Steelers), also hoping Butler can at push Gay to the dime back.

To extend Troy’s career It might be in our best interest to look for a new SS, and slide the hair to FS.

by alistar7 on Mar 2, 2011 8:27 PM EST reply actions  

Great post MR....but

I don’t think the front office will listen. We are not a team that is heavily active in the FA market so there is no way we sign Nmandi (not that you mentioned that but others have). Also, the Steelers are not big on resigning DB (we all remember letting Woodson go) FAs so I feel Ivan “Ike” Taylor will be signed to a bigger contract for another team (dependant on a new CBA). Our defense has historically depended on pressure to the QB compensating for the lack of talent at DB. The Pats have beaten us not with a smart Tom Brady but with max protect and letting Brady wait for an open receiver. We lost to the Pack due to Rodger’s quick release. The same could have been said for SB XLIII for it not for a Herculean effort from BB and Santonio. Remember, that the Cardinal’s D was not nearly as good as the Pack’s D. This is an issue that has been around for quite some time.

"Availability is a good ability." Mike Tomlin

by woody71 on Mar 2, 2011 9:38 PM EST reply actions  

To clarify

I agree with you 100%. Our top priority in the draft should be DB.

"Availability is a good ability." Mike Tomlin

by woody71 on Mar 2, 2011 9:43 PM EST up reply actions  

A CB we draft this year is not going to significantly improve our secondary this season. Due to the depth in this draft I expect them to take one in the 2nd round.

The Steelers do act outside the norm for players they covet, Troy, Holmes, Farrior. IMO both Pouncey and Nnamdi merit that action.

If not Nnamdi a FA CB is our best hope at seriously upgrading our CB corps for 2011. Butler should push his way up the ladder, but we really need two new starters, and that’s assuming Ike doesn’t leave. If he goes we may have to take CBs in the first two rounds.

by alistar7 on Mar 2, 2011 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Following Bill Walsh's Example

As always an excellent post with excellent ideas.

I don’t know that I would want Rooney doing too much dictating – yes he did it last year and to seemingly great effect, but those were more broad directives….

But I liked the bit about history of Bill Walsh. You’re right. The 49ers defenses of the 1980’s did not get the ink of the offenses, but they were excellent in their own right. I had not realized that he more or less stocked his entire secondary in such a short time.

For all the credit (justly earned) that Walsh gets as a “genuis” coach, his ability as a talent evaluator is often over looked. Although it pains me to say it, Bill Walsh was probably a better talent evaluator than Chuck Noll.

by Hombre de Acero on Mar 2, 2011 10:31 PM EST reply actions  

well written piece

I just want to add that we could not even compare the Bill Walsh 49ers with the current Steelers if they had not already built such a tremendous foundation. Yes, they should shore up the secondary (the lack of early round CB’s compared to the rest of the NFL is eye-opening), but a better secondary would do nothing for the team if the rest was not already so solid.

Timmons vs Revis in an earlier comment is telling. The front office has made sacrifices in the secondary to strengthen the skill positions on offense and the front seven on defense. Their decisions have so far been justified, as borne out by the Steelers huge success in this decade.
Next step is a beefed up secondary, while also re-loading depth elsewhere.

by tkired on Mar 2, 2011 10:59 PM EST reply actions  

MR

i could not possibly agree more with any of your points. and as a side note, i would just like to say that since i began frequenting this site last march, all of your articles have been fine reads, and i always look forward to them.

by jd5757 on Mar 2, 2011 11:43 PM EST reply actions  

another tremendous article

Thanks for the excellent read. I seem to learn something new every time I read one of your pieces.

So… resign Ike, sign a decent FA CB who isn’t Nnamdi (too expensive) and draft a DB in the 2nd round? Sounds doable to me but then my wife handles the finances in our house while I do the cooking (this works because I hate worrying about money but I like to cook).

"I don't mind being a symbol but I don't want to become a monument. There are monuments all over the Parliament Buildings and I've seen what the pigeons do to them."

"Canada is like an old cow. The West feeds it. Ontario and Quebec milk it. And you can well imagine what it's doing in the Maritimes."

Tommy Douglas

by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Mar 3, 2011 12:30 AM EST reply actions  

The Steelers will take the BPA & that means no CB or OT

Everything you say is true. I want Taylor resigned & Brandon Harris myself, but…

CB & OT (along w/QB) are the most over-drafted positions in the game.

The Steelers draft the Best Player Available.

The Steelers always draft in the bottom of the league and this year they are at 31.

The Steelers never panic and believe that they can wait until the shopping spree is over & find players who are good enough. They won the Superbowl 43 with Starks (3rd), Colon (4th), Taylor (3rd), McFadden (2nd). It’s a deep year for CB.

First round, expect a WR, G, DL, or LB.

by Eleye on Mar 3, 2011 9:56 AM EST reply actions  

im not sure about a reciever in the first round

our recieving group is a little bit crowded right now. i kinda feel the same way about linebacker, but we will see how the draft falls. honestly predicting what we will take at 31 is fun, yet worthless cause some team will no doubt pull something crazy before us (probably the raiders) and completely make us throw out what we thought we knew.

by steelerintexas on Mar 3, 2011 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Taylor, FA's and the draft

Right now it looks like they’ll have to pay Taylor at least $11MM per year to keep him, or maybe $40MM over 4 yrs … is he worth it? If we have to pay that much, why not sign Osumugha instead? Different type of player, but certainly a #1 to replace a #1.

We know what Gay and BMac offer, so that’s not much help. Banking on Lewis or Butler stepping up big is crazy-risky, so you have to draft somebody in Rd 1 or Rd 2 … or trade lower picks for another pick in top 75 if you’re going BPA in 1 and 2.

by Watty4ever on Mar 3, 2011 1:38 PM EST reply actions  

i dont see any team playing taylor $11MM

a corner that cant catch wont get that much. i dont even think a team like the cowgirls will give him that much, even though he would drastically help them. no flash = no money from the big spenders.

by steelerintexas on Mar 4, 2011 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

INT's

are an over-rated stat … it’s stopping the other team from completing passes to its top WRs that’s the whole point of playing CB in the NFL in 2011

I don’t think Revis, Osumugha, or C Bailey have been judged on INTs. They’re judged by the fact that most teams don’t try to throw on them.

by Watty4ever on Mar 6, 2011 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I hate to say it because he played well for us… but it may be time to part ways with F. Adams. With Willie and Starks back our tackle position gets crowded. Scott has proven hiself to be a serviceable backup. If it comes down to it the 5 mil we pay Adams would be better spent on our secondary.

If I recall El and Foot make decent change for backups as well. I hear they bring a great locker room presence but so does winning. Maybe contracts could get restructured…but something has to give.

by SteelcityRP on Mar 5, 2011 9:46 AM EST reply actions  

Foote is 3 million, ARE 2.3 million.

by alistar7 on Mar 5, 2011 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Your all time Steeler regret?
5467103_small
Hines Ward: a different look part 1. Hines vs. the big boys.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Isaac Redman 2012: Should we temper our expectations?
Photo_small
Worry Warts
6-trophies_small
The Saint Will Be The Starter for 2012 - The Whole Season.
Trophies_small
Why Is Rashard Mendenhall Still On This Roster?
2009-week6_1440x900_benroethlisberger_small
Pads - To wear or not to wear
Small
53 Man Roster (Way too early edition)
Small
WHEN DO TICKETS GO ON SALE?
Small
Submitted for your approval: Steeler names for this year's pledge class
Small
The biggest offseason ever

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo