Salary cap can increase to $126.885 million in 2011
Ike may not be gone yet!
10 months ago
LV Steelers Fan
9 comments
0 recs |
Comments
If this is true, it is great news for us
We can keep Ike without having to cut Aaron Smith.
Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...
I’m not so sure about that – I think they’re already around $127M for this year, and that’s WITHOUT signing ANY of their free agents or draft picks. Every extra million helps, but there will still be a lot of tough decisions to make. Sure hope they do manage to keep Ike though, I don’t like the depth behind him…
We're at $130M
Colbert’s still going to have some fancy tapdancing to do to free up the room to resign Ike and a vet OT (Flozell is not going to be pulling down $5 million)
i posted the projected caps on all teams for 2011
and if the numbers are right, steelers are at $116mm, which means they could spend up to $10.875mm, but realistically they are going to have to re-do many contracts b/c the bucs are required to spend at least $59.7mm more with the new CBA and could spend up to $67.405 if they wanted to max out. (highly unlikely they will max out but they could)
salary cap is $120.375 for 2011 with 2 transition bumps ($3.5mm for vets and $3mm availabe to borrow from a future cap year, which must be repaid).
so my math says the max-out salary cap# is $126.875mm -$116mm = $10.875 available for steelers. unfortunately, there are 22 teams who have near $20mm up to almost $70mm available to spend per team.
so if you look at the steelers on their own, you might not say it’s too bad until you realize the rest of the league is going to be out there bidding huge on guys like Ike because they have to spend the money.
That number that you’re quoting doesn’t include Woodley’s franchise tag or any of the RFA tenders – Yasinskas omitted them because when he wrote it back in February he didn’t know if those types of contracts would still exist in the new CBA.
We’re going to be about $10.5M over
by barnerburner on Jul 25, 2011 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions
#4 on that list is stupid
Why cut Sweed now? He’s on the books for less than a million and has a very high ceiling. They’d be better off cutting someone like Fox and giving Foote a restructure or be cut offer.
Back on the Sweed train. Choo Choo!
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
by John Stephens on Jul 25, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL
Your obsession with Sweed is almost unhealthy.
Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...
by StoneColdSteel on Jul 26, 2011 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Because I realize his potential
Back on the Sweed train. Choo Choo!
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
by John Stephens on Jul 26, 2011 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions
true, $10.5mm over but reduce by $6.5 the transition $
so really only $4 over.





























