Assessing the Steelers Backup Quarterback Options
At this time last year, Steeler Nation was engaged in a healthy debate about the competition for the starting quarterback job while Ben Roethlisberger served a four-game suspension to start the season. Many hoped Dennis Dixon would win the competition during training camp and the preseason; others argued for the more experienced Byron Leftwich, who rose to the occasion and delivered a much-needed win for the Steelers during his lone significant appearance during the 2008 season. Ivan Cole even made the case for Charlie Batch before the calendar turned to September, a prescient perspective it turned out, though not one most had given much thought to.Turns out we got to see all three in action before Roethlisberger's returned to face the Cleveland Browns in Week 6 after the team's bye week.
Fast forward to this year. With the lockout in place for over four months, we still didn't really even find it all that important to talk about the quarterback situation despite having all the time in the world to speculate about backup position battles.
Of course, Big Ben faces no suspension to start the season, and obviously he's proven himself to be one of the league's very best quarterbacks. But you still never know what the future holds in the violent NFL. For a team with legitimate Super Bowl chances in 2011, it's important to make sure there's contingency plan(s) in place at the most important position.
So what are the backup quarterback options at the Steelers' disposal? The team's website still lists the same trio of Dixon, Leftwich and Batch on the roster, but only Leftwich's situation is cut and dry.
The 36-year old Batch achieved cult legend status last season when he guided the Steelers to a 2-1 record in emergency duty, but as of now, he's not under contract. Not that it would take him eons to get prepared physically, but it's worth noting that he probably hasn't spent nearly as much time working out this offseason due to his responsibilities as the Steelers player rep in the CBA negotiations. More importantly, it's hard to imagine the Steelers keeping four quarterbacks on the roster under any circumstance. Big Ben is one, Leftwich, who has one year remaining on his two-year deal, will be in the mix. Then there's Dennis Dixon, who was offered a restricted free agent tender just days before the lockout. With just three years of accrued service, there's zero chance that Dixon will be anything buy a restricted free agent under the provisions of any new CBA.
Batch's situation would be helped by another team making a bid on Dixon and the Steelers allowing him to walk. That would allow Batch to slide in to the No. 3 role, earn a paycheck, serve more as a coach than anything, but be available just in case Roethlisberger got injured, followed by Leftwich either also getting injured or struggling mightily.
Hopefully all of this is a moot point and Big Ben will play a full season and at a high level. That's a fairly safe bet despite the fact that he's taken plenty of beatings in and out of the pocket the past four seasons. But it's hard to infer with any sort of certainty just how well his foot might be feeling at this point in time. He'll be ready to play and he'll fight through any pain he might be experiencing. That's what Big Ben does. But still, as I mentioned at the outset, teams with complete rosters have to have a safety valve at QB, even if their No. 1 guy has a track record of durability.
So, what do you think will shake out at the backup QB position?
54 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here's my solution
I think keep Denis and Charlie. I would love to keep Byron but we just can’t waste a roster spot on a 4th. And Byron is also more productive than Charlie in my opinion butj Batch just filed for bankrupcy, we can’t throw him on the streets after all these years.
This isn't a charity the Steelers are running
Batch’s financial woes are overstated. It’s not as if he has no money and if the Steelers cut him he’ll be the next Joe Gilliam.
I say let Dixon walk. He's a nice, young talent, but he's never going to break through in Pittsburgh, obviously.
At this stage in his career, Leftwich may be content with making a living as a backup. If he’s not, then he’ll obviously try to sign elsewhere as a starter next season. You have Leftwich as the back up with Batch at number 3. Batch will probably be gone by 2012. If Leftwich decides he’d like another crack at starting, you bring in another veteran to back up Roethlisberger in 2012 and draft someone in the lower rounds to be the number 3.
give Dix all of the preseason min.
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
by SNW on Jul 6, 2011 12:03 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
fail
We all know, Batch and Lefty. Either Dix sinks or gives some team an idea he is better than what they have now. Or make Batch a coach and keep them all. Another ?, Lefty want to start?
If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.
by SNW on Jul 6, 2011 12:08 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
pretty sure Byron knows he’s a backup at this point. he had every opportunity in the world to be the starter in Tampa but flamed out.
by steel.curtain.number2 on Jul 6, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Jacksonville too
He’s now downgraded to journeyman status
that's a tough one
Batch is obviously at the end of his career. Leftwich is set to be a backup for the rest of his and I’d guess we can keep him at a low price. Dixon is the wild card. He’s probably the only QB not named Ben on the roster that can have value in a trade going forward, but in order to do that he’ll have to see the field for a stretch.
Obviously if Ben is out for an extended period of time we’re in trouble, but that’s the same story for every QB in the league. I’d say move Charlie to QB coach so he’s not thrown to the wolves and keep Dixon as the backup with Leftwich as a security blanket. Part of me also wants to play high stakes gambler and just keep Dixon as the sole backup. I know it was rare when Cowher kept more than 2 on the roster, and that extra spot could come in handy for keeping an extra young player instead of losing one at the cut date.
might not be such a bad idea
keep Byron, try to trade Dixon for something, make Batch the QB coach and if we need to just sign him back as a backup midseason.
by steel.curtain.number2 on Jul 6, 2011 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think you can do that.
I’m pretty sure the NFL has rules in place not allowing coaches to be signed as players during the season.
by NYSteelersFan4 on Jul 6, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Didn't Steve DeBerg goo from coach to player in the same season?
I think he may have still been with the Chiefs then.
I don't think we can trade Dixon
First off he’s a free agent unless we extend his contract. Second, he’s not worth anything until he gets more real playing time. I just think he’s got more potential for a future trade. The others have no market anywhere else.
hes a restricted free agent
only 3 years experience which means even with a new CBA he’ll be restricted. give him a 3rd round tender, 1 round earlier than we took him, and see if a team bites
by steel.curtain.number2 on Jul 6, 2011 11:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Lions fan here
Charlie is one of my favorites. he should still be playing for us, but our porous O Line broke him (ive never seen a QB get battered the way he did). and ‘he who cant be named’ bailed on him ASAP. im glad he ended up on my 2nd favorite team serving a useful purpose and coming through when called upon.
Dixon sucks.
Dixon isn’t worth squat. He can’t read defenses, has a horrible arm and makes very poor decisions. Batch is a much better option despite being fragile and ancient. Leftwich will be our #1 backup and Batch will be behind him. We’ll let Dixon walk where he’ll be a 3rd string on another team.
wow
Dixon may not be a starting QB, but that’s some strong criticism for somebody who hasn’t played much, and looked pretty good when he was healthy.
I’m not saying Dixon should be a starter, but there are far worse options as a backup. Passing that harsh of a judgement on a young QB is a bit misplaced IMO. There are plenty of examples in league history where it takes a QB 4 years to get their footing – in fact it used to be the model teams developed them by. It was incredibly for a QB to be productive in their first 4 years, and it definitely was not expected that they light up the league. People seem to get the impression that players today are incapable of improving over what they were at age 21, when a QB normally won’t hit their prime until they are 27 or older.
Thats 4 years of STARTING or of significant playing time. Which Dix hasnt gotten here. I like him, but lefty and Chuck should be the backups.
by TheStillerWay86 on Jul 10, 2011 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree
That is far too harsh judgement. One thing no one has commented on is the fact that this is the NFL. Look what happened when Brady got hurt. Do we really want to be in that situation ? Even with four QB’s on the roster last season there were times when we didn’t have even one healthy QB. Charlie moving to QB coach sounds logical to me. I think when you look at all of those big named QB’s coming out of college struggling mightily and you compare them to Dennis he has the potential to be a starter if we need him to be that. I dread having to go find Brian St. Pierre and resign him in December again.
new to sb nation
I must agree lkwdsteel..I like dixon and would love to see more of him..give him some time to grow!
by colettemichele on Jul 19, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions
The best solution
would probably be for Dixon to move on. The chances that he’ll be anything other than just an emergency contributor in Pittsburgh are very slim. Ben should be able to play for another 5-10 years minimum, and even if he improves significantly, Dixon will not be the position to challenge him. On the other hand he may have a real shot in places like Washington, Chicago, Minnesota or Seatlle where the qb situations are a lot less settled.
Leftwich, on the other hand, is probably not going to get too many chances elsewhere. His chances of actually playing Pittsburgh may be less, but the stakes and the benefits of being with the Steelers are extremely high. So far his track record has been two seasons, two trips to the Super Bowl, one ring. Not bad. Back up quarterbacks make more money than most starters at other positions, the cost of living is low. He likes it here and the team seems to like him. Good career move.
Batch brings a number of benefits. Don’t let his age distract you. He has spent the past ten years with the Steelers without playing very much. This means that there has been very little wear and tear on his body during that time, and quarterback position is not as physically unforgiving generally relative to other positions. The leadership that he brings is off the charts at this point. He is not a career backup. He was the starting quarterback at Detroit and knows how to lead a lockerroom. His role with the players union will only enhance his stature in the Steelers lockr room and around the league. He gets along extremely well with Ben, and what Ben wants will carry considerable weight.
One more thing. He may not be able to hang onto his roster spot given the red hot competition in the receivers corp. But don’t forget that Randle El would serve as an excellent emergency quarterback and would the team some options at the position.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Jul 6, 2011 8:50 PM EDT reply actions
"This means that there has been very little wear and tear on his body during that time"
dont underestimate the beatings he got in detroit. might have taken years off his life. that said he never shied away from it. toughest QB ive ever seen. i hope he sticks around.
Declare the Competition Open
I have a lot of sympathy for that Ivan Cole says above.
I don’t want to be too down on Dixon, after 2 and a third game’s starting, but he did not strike me being “in control” out there last year. Ok, the circumstances were not the best.
Which is why I say give him an honest shot at a roster spot, but let the best man win.
That may be tricky as Tomlin needed to give Dixon and Leftwhich work last year while getting Ben some reps (and Tomlin handled the situation masterfully, despite what some critics argued) but it need not be rocket science as it was last year.
Assuming there are four preseason games, each man can get his shot as the first man off the bench.
Lot of typos
Got distracted. Haven’t been on site for awhile. Sorry folks.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Jul 6, 2011 10:09 PM EDT reply actions
Terrell Pryor
After the smoke clears on this, how about picking Terrell Pryor – if we can get him in the 3rd round of the supplemental draft (I don’t think he will last that long though). I know that it would be risky because of his baggage. But he is talented. He is local. And, I am told that he has a special bond with Charlie Batch. He would have the benefit of being close to his family (in Jeannette). We have a lot of veterans who could help keep him in line. And (if he can be patient) he can learn by being mentored by Big Ben and Charlie Batch. We could keep him on the Practice Squad for as long as necessary. This kid has LOT of talent. If we can harness his ego and patience, he has the potential to be a future super star . I have used a lot of ifs and am sure that I will get a lot of criticism for suggesting this move. I would hate to see it come back and hurt us in the future if we pass on him and he lives up to what I think he is capable of being. Hit me with your best shots.
Not a bad call
But really he could be a super star, but how would we ever know?
It’s more likely that you find a GREAT QB through the draft on a team that NEEDS a great QB.
Guys like Brady are the exceptions where they show up outta nowhere due to injury. The chances of Pryer even getting a shot to show his worth are not as good as the chances of a 3rd round pick developing for the Steelers as a starter down the line
I am thinking ahead about "what if".
To me Ben is one of the top 3 QB’s in the league. But, because he takes so many hits and has this lingering foot problem, Pryor would be good insurance a few years from now. He is the same size as Ben and is much faster. Dixon, to me could be a very good QB, but seems to be hurt a lot. He might be better off with another team. I suggest we keep Lefty as the backup and hold on to Batch for leadership – and just in case. I want to see Ben rack up a couple more Super Bowls and take less hits. After a couple seasons on the practice squad Pryor could be moved up to the spot occupied by Batch and be Ben’s heir apparent. And Charlie could move on to a management position.
Terrelle Pryor?
LOL.
The Steelers pride themselves in having a relatively spotless organization. Of all the guys they could bring in, why would they bring in that guy? Basically a TE playing QB that played horrible in big games; and let’s not mention that whole Ohio Taint mess.
Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...
by StoneColdSteel on Jul 7, 2011 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions
I hate Ohio State but everything you said here was wrong
Basically a TE playing QB
He is more refined as a QB than Cam Newton, who if you did not know was the #1 pick in the draft. He completes more passes, is as athletic, has a better arm, and reads defenses better.
that played horrible in big games
He was the MVP of both BCS bowl games he played in. He beat Michigan all 3 times. He only lost 4 times in his entire career. How did he play bad in big games?
My Seton Hall blog: http://thesetonhallblog.blogspot.com/
My Steelers blog: thenewsteelcurtain.blogspot.com
My Draft Blog: draftdatabase.wordpress.com
by seton hall and steelers on Jul 7, 2011 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions
No
You should read KC Joyner’s piece on Pryor.
Pryor’s throwing motion is uglier than sin and he isn’t all that great at reading coverage. And how come Cam Newton had a greater impact on his team in one year than Pryor had despite having basically the same offense for 3 years? And did I mention that Cam did this against SEC defenses?
Beating Michigan is nothing to be proud of. Mississippi State is normally a bottom dweller and they beat those clowns 52-14 in the Gator Bowl. I don’t think beating RichRod is much of an accomplishment.
And did I mention Tattoogate? At least Cam’s father was mainly at fault for his ordeal.
Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...
by StoneColdSteel on Jul 7, 2011 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions
But beating Oregon and Arkansas (and Penn State twice, I might add) should count for big games, right?
He’s not as good as Cam Newton… neither, apparently, was any other quarterback in the country.
“At least Cam’s father was mainly at fault for his ordeal.” – you actually bought that bull? How could you be completely ignorant that your father was shopping around to different schools?
Lol
So you’re saying that Pryor winning those games is equivalent to Newton having to face a daunting SEC schedule? Let’s not pretend that Auburn’s roster was stacked; they had Cam, Fairley, Dyer, and a bunch of regular dudes.
Did you happen to miss the Alabama game (in which Bama should have wiped them out) where Cam basically put that team on his back in the 2nd half? How about the Arkansas game where neither team’s defense decided to show up and Arkansas’ backup QB showed us that he was almost as good as Mallett? Or how about both times against South Carolina?
Pryor played very well in a few games, but he is nowhere near the player that Cam is. BTW, Andrew Luck was/is better than Cam because he would’ve been the landslide #1 pick overall had he come out.
And no, I don’t believe Cam is totally innocent. But at least he isn’t dumb enough to show up to a team meeting in the car that the NCAA is questioning him about in the first place.
Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...
by StoneColdSteel on Jul 8, 2011 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't think the Steelers should take him
But you don’t seem to really know what you’re talking about.
He didn’t break the law, do steroids, or cheat on his tests. He sold some stuff he owned. I’m still incredibly pissed off at him for what it did to the university, and I wouldn’t call him a high-character guy, but he’s much less of a risk that way than a lot of athletes.
He’s definitely a project, but he reads defenses better than most qb’s coming out of a spread offense, and he’s used to working out of the shotgun. When he’s on, his motion and arm are solid. He’s just incredibly inconsistent as of last year. I fully expected him to be competing for a Heisman this year, given his year over year growth the previous years, before he brought the whole school down around his ears.
That said… we’ve already got one athletic project of a quarterback. Not sure we need another.
I guess Pryor was suspended for nothing then, right?
You Ohio State just don’t get it.
Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...
by StoneColdSteel on Jul 8, 2011 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions
This
Is the most idiotic thing since drafting Mark Malone
by TheStillerWay86 on Jul 10, 2011 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Idiotic?
Maybe in your opinion – and I respect it. But I don’t think it is and I will stick by it. I hope that we will take a chance on him, if he is available in the 3rd round. It will probably be a moot point because I am sure that he will be gone by then. No matter where he goes, I hope that he has learned from his mistakes.
Keep Dixon and Batch
Dixon showed a lot of potential. Missed some open reads but for all intents and purposes was playing his first ever NFL action with us. You can’t expect that dude to go lights out.
And lets not forget, Dixon was in a Baltimore game where he took the lead late.
Perhaps with more refinement and some garbage time he could get more comfy and play better.
Batch though IMO is a great fill-in for a complete game. I feel Lefty is a little bit more apt to sub in mid game.
Can’t keep em all. I’d rather have mobility over a big arm when our O-line can’t give you 3 seconds to think.
I'd agree with this
Batch and Dixon give us a nice combination. Lefty hasn’t looked like as good of an option as Batch for the present, and his future doesn’t have as much potential as Dixon. Plus – Dixon is a less expensive option.
Unless we move to the read option, I'm really not a fan of giving Dixon a lot of time in the preseason
"Go to Hell, Michigan Football"
by ICEICETHATGUY13 on Jul 7, 2011 10:06 AM EDT reply actions
Reality
The Steelers QB depth chart in 2011 will be
- Ben
- Leftwich
- Dixon
The fact of the matter is that Charlie Batch played like garbage against the Titans and the Steelers were bailed out by their defense and STs, played very well against TB and was very mediocre against Baltimore. Batch’s efforts in the first 3 games are largely overstated. At the end of last season Batch was behind Leftwich on the depth chart, so IMO nothing changed this offseason to alter that. So Leftwich remains the top backup to Ben.
As for Dixon. Not sure why everyone is so down on him. The guy did play ok in the opener last year against Atlanta. IMO the Steelers are going to want to see if this guy can be a legit backup QB option to Ben so he will make the roster this year.
Very mediocre?
He wasn’t WOW but he didn’t lose the game (points finger at B-Mac)…
The guy basically played one great game. One good enough game, and one crappy game.
The defense played one great game, one good enough game, and one crappy game.
So he didn’t do too bad IMO.
I don't think B-Mac lost that game
That game was lost when we couldn’t convert a first down and had to punt from our own endzone.
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Jul 12, 2011 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Let's not forget the physical dimension for Dixon
As much as I lobbied for the guy to start same time last year, the sad reality is that, unless he was grafted MJD legs on that spindly body of his during the offseason, he’ll never withstand a full season of the kind of punishment Ben, Byron and Charlie have all withstood as starters behind our O-line, in the Arians offense. His knee injuries (let’s not forget his senior year) are all too painful reminders of this sad fact. Maybe Dennis can latch on to a true West Coast offense team as a backup elsewhere, or, as is my secret wish, he could end up on the secret negotiations list of the Montreal Alouettes.
"Beware the lollipop of mediocrity; lick it once and you'll suck forever."
THE Brian Wilson, not the damn pitcher
by Flying Polamalus on Jul 7, 2011 2:17 PM EDT reply actions
Not disagreeing with you...
But people said the same thing about DeSean Jackson, the fastest dude in PA not named Mike Wallace.
"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will
by lottwasgangsta on Jul 7, 2011 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
But DeSean doesn’t have to stand behind center, waiting for 2000 pounds of mad meat to crash over him, every single play.
"Beware the lollipop of mediocrity; lick it once and you'll suck forever."
THE Brian Wilson, not the damn pitcher
by Flying Polamalus on Jul 8, 2011 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions
You speak
as if having a shaky offensive line is permanent condition. In spite of the fact that they didn’t have Pouncey during the Super Bowl they pretty much ran at will against the Packers and Ben was only sacked once I believe. Unless we have contnued bad luck in relation to injuries I think days of this knee jerk skunking of the O Line are about over.
by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Jul 8, 2011 1:37 PM EDT reply actions
Yea but the
offensive line gave up a lot of defensive pressures which caused turnovers in the superbowl.
Although I agree without all those injuries, our offensive line will be decent. Lets hope for an healthy 2011 season.
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Jul 12, 2011 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions
Backups
I would keep Lefty and Dixon. Keep Lefty as the main veteran backup while still developing Dixon to take over that role in the long run if the Steelers resign him to a longterm deal. Dixon will never be more than a backup in this league.
Proud fan of Pittsburgh's professional sports teams and the Pirates too.
by Black&GoldTrain on Jul 8, 2011 10:59 PM EDT reply actions
i predict dixon won't make it
this year he’ll have to prove his current worth to make the team. simply making it on “potential” doesn’t cut it when he’s going into his 4th year in the league.
byron outperformed him last preseason & pracitce and i’m guessing he’ll do it again.
batch outperformed him during the regular season & i think he’ll do it again especially when they’ll have limited practice time (ben & byron getting most of it).
One more thing to think about.
The league is seriously thinking about an 18 game schedule in the near future to generate more revenue. There WILL be more injuries. This is a contact sport. Goodell was on tv a couple of weeks ago talking about this.

by 






























