Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

A Unique Solution To The Pittsburgh Steelers Offensive Line Situation

The right tackle position is often referred to as the "Other Tackle." Teams typically employ mauler-types with the idea of having that player anchor much of their strong-side rushing attack. 

They are by no means an inferior version of a left tackle. If the left tackle is poetry in motion, the right tackle is the simple-but-head-pounding heavy metal song. Height isn't necessarily a requirement, but they'll be on the taller side. 

Star-divide

Their scouting reports will often read "aggressive finisher," and "road-grater." You'll see "quickness" be listed as a strength on the best ones, with footwork and balance as key physical skills. 

Let's take two players, calling them Player 1 and Player 2. 

Here's the scouting report on Player 1: 

He lacks great height (6-foot-3) but is an excellent combination of strength and athleticism. He has good initial quickness to gain leverage at the point of attack. He uses a powerful punch and strong hands to lock on and control defenders as both a run and pass blocker. His natural low center of gravity makes him tough to bull rush off the edge. 

And the scouting report on Player 2: 

(at 6-foot-4) He is a tenacious competitor who finishes his blocks with attitude. He has great initial quickness, foot agility and balance to gain leverage at the line of scrimmage. He plays with active hands and understands angles. He is quick to react and is rarely out of position as plays develop. He plays with consistent pad level and is an excellent technician.

They seem awfully familiar, don't they? 

There are universal skills in both of them suggesting they each are effective offensive linemen. In Player 1, "...strong hands to lock on and control defenders," and "good initial quickness" are vital traits for all five spots. 

Player 2 seems to also have some great attributes. "...finishes blocks with attitude," and "great initial quickness, foot agility and balance" are pretty good traits to have. 

Player 1 is Steelers RT Willie Colon, who's facing his second consecutive season on the IR. 

Player 2 is Pro Bowl C Maurkice Pouncey

I'll bet you see where I'm going with this. 

Before I'm captured, beaten and stuffed into the box I'm suggesting getting outside of, let's look at a few things: 

Teams look for two things when replacing an offensive linemen, whether on their current roster or not; Whether he knows the offense well enough to contribute immediately, and what kind of physical conditioning has he maintained.

Looking internally, is Chris Scott - listed as Colon's back-up at right tackle - knowledgeable enough in the offense to be asked to play now? Ditto Marcus Gilbert.

What kind of shape is former Steelers RT Flozell Adams in? This isn't suggesting Adams has been wearing and eating Homer's Nacho Hat for the last seven months, nor is it saying it's impossible for either Scott or Gilbert to see the field in this situation. It is suggesting the Steelers could look even more internally than just who's listed at what position. 

The center inherently has more to understand about the offense than the right tackle does.

Blocking assignments, blitz reads and even coverages are called by the center. He scans the whole field and points out threats and can adjust blocking assignments for everyone. It's rare indeed a player like Pouncey can pick all of that up in his rookie season and perform at the level he did.

But he was injured, forcing Doug Legursky - now starting at right guard - into the coveted center position in the Super Bowl. And ya know what? He didn't do too badly. He played a decent game, and despite the huge deficit the Steelers found themselves in early, they ran the ball effectively. 

Bringing these two points together, the three most obvious options to replace Colon are Chris Scott and Marcus Gilbert from inside the team (both very green) and Flozell Adams from outside it (didn't have training camp, and they'd have to pay him at least within a small percentage of the $5 million he made last year). Plus, Adams' agent, Jordan Woy, told the Post-Gazette, the Steelers have had "brief discussions" with him, but "nothing is imminent." Maybe that's Woy's way of playing it cool, but considering it's five days before the second game of the season - critically important, assuming the Steelers would rather not start 0-2 - the Steelers are looking to give Scott his first start. 

Or...

Move your best offensive lineman to the team's biggest position of need. While it wasn't the same coaching staff, former All-Pro LG Alan Faneca moved to left tackle for nine games in 2003 when Marvel Smith went down with a pinched nerve in his neck. Faneca may not have been built as a prototypical blind side blocker, but he was a naturally gifted and intelligent offensive lineman. 

Is Pouncey really any different? He picked up the hardest position on the line in training camp his rookie year, and not only held it down, he became one of the best in the game at that spot. Interestingly, Pouncey is 6-foot-4 (taller than Colon), 315 pounds. Faneca had one inch on Pouncey and played at the same weight. 

So why switch Pouncey from center? Because the Steelers are a lot deeper at center than at right tackle. Legursky has proved he can play the position at an acceptable level. And taking over at right guard? Ramon Foster, the starter in Super Bowl XLV. You've got Trai Essex to back-up right guard and center already, and in the event of in-game injury,  you can move these players back to their pre-Colon injury positions.

It's not as if this line isn't used to guys being injured. Having to adapt to that is probably second-nature to them by now, like breathing or not watching The Apprentice. 

Not crazy, not unprecedented, not without reason. Certainly less disruptive to the offensive line's overall cohesion, and would save the Steelers from spending another few million dollars. This isn't to say this is what they will - or even should - do. A smart management group is going to explore all possibilities to help overcome adversity. This one would provide the Steelers with the most experienced offensive line with guys who are currently on the team. 

Then again, maybe they should coax Faneca out of retirement. 

Comment 64 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

wow

that would indeed be unique – nice creativity.

That said though, I doubt it happens – Tomlin has said multiple times that he doesn’t like shuffling multiple positions just to replace one player. In this case, replacing one would mean shuffling three, or 60% of the entire line.

by Simonsen on Sep 13, 2011 8:51 AM EDT reply actions  

On the cutting room floor is a bit about the financial implications of it. I don’t think they’re going to sign Flozell YET, but they’re gonna fill Colon’s roster spot (when he’s officially placed on the IR) with another OL. That makes their starter a second-year rookie (Scott was essentially redshirted last year) with a true rookie and possibly practice squaders Trevis Turner or John Malecki backing them up. Anything else, you’re asking Essex to back-up all five positions.

One more injury there and they’d have to start entertaining “creative” solutions, or spend money on a vet.

by Neal Coolong on Sep 13, 2011 9:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Provided they don't go out and sign someone, I think it's either going to be Scott or Essex.

Essex is the top utility guy and they’ve used him at tackle in emergency situations before. Wouldn’t be surprised to see him out there again this Sunday.

by Anthony Defeo on Sep 13, 2011 9:02 AM EDT reply actions  

That’s a big part of the reason they signed him. It’ll be interesting to see how they work it, but I think you’re right, it’ll be one of those two. I just think they’re not going to want to spend that much on Flozell, or, at the very least, they’re going to be looking very hard at Scott to give them a reason to bring Adams back.

by Neal Coolong on Sep 13, 2011 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Essex

Trai as a backup/utility guys is fine but started for 15 games is not so fine. I would rather we develop someone with potential to improve than settle for less than average for the remainder of the season.

"Canada is a great country, one of the hopes of the world. We can be a better one – a country of greater equality, justice, and opportunity." Jack Layton (R.I.P.)

"My city's still breathing (but barely it's true) through buildings gone missing like teeth. The sidewalks are watching me think about you, all sparkled with broken glass. I'm back with scars to show. Back with the streets I know. They never take me anywhere but here. " John K Samson (Left and Leaving)

by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Sep 13, 2011 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. Develop Gilbert. Lets see what he has. They drafted him in the second round for a reason. It’s too bad that he didn’t get practice time in during the lockout which stunted his development.

Proud fan of Pittsburgh's professional sports teams and the Pirates too.

by Black&GoldTrain on Sep 13, 2011 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pouncey seems to think he's awesome

And he’s given us no reason to think he’s wrong about anything related to playing offensive line.

by Mike Frazer on Sep 13, 2011 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like the out of the box thinking of this.

Like others, doubt it happens, but the Seahawks would be a good team to try this experiment on. I figure they move Essex to RT. Here is another idea to piggy back yours, maybe move one of the OL from the PS to the 53 man roster, then sign Warren to the PS, unless of course he has signed somewhere else that I don’t remember.

Things can always be worse....

by ncmt40 on Sep 13, 2011 9:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Warren

He’s on the Lions practice squad, so Pittsburgh could sign him to their 53, but not their PS.

Your thought about moving an OL from the PS to the 53 is legit though. I wouldn’t be surprised to see that happen. I’m typically not big on a team bringing up a PS guy in situations like this, though, because 1. you really need to make a season-long commitment, and PS guys should only be used in emergencies, unless the plan is to keep the PS guy on the 53 for the remainder of the season (they have to stay a minimum of three weeks as it is). 2. If you bring him up, you risk other teams getting a look at him, and they could swipe him for their PS or 53 when you cut him in hopes to bring him back to the PS (read: Gibson, Thad, and Harris, Sunny).

Not to suggest we cut the next Butkis and Mean Joe, but you should use your PS to develop players on your terms, not put them in position for another team to swoop in on them. Something unique happened when you bring a guy up from the PS.

I’d prefer they look for a vet, but the only ones they’d bring in would be Adams ($$$) and Starks (I’ve heard several times he was out of shape and there was a rift between him and Tomlin/FO). Not sure if either of those are viable options.

by Neal Coolong on Sep 13, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Knew Butler was signed, but did not remember Warren

I did not know if someone was called up from the PS they had to stay at least 3 weeks. IIRC, we pulled McClendon up last year when Smith went down, that is where my thought came from. Thanks for the info

Things can always be worse....

by ncmt40 on Sep 13, 2011 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

really interesting post

good food for thought, I never would of thought of moving Pouncey to RT, but you make a strong argument. I have no doubt that Pouncey could play RT effectively, hell I bet he could play any position on the line above average. I think the steelers should really consider bringing back Starks tho, they could probably get him cheaper than Flozell. Even if Starks is still outta shape they should bring him in and get him into game shape, even if that means missing a few games to start.

by blitzzburgh on Sep 13, 2011 9:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Former Offensive line coach here

and I approve of this message.

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 13, 2011 10:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Marcus Gilbert could just be our RT the rest of the year

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Lloyd, Andy Russell, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene, Curtis Martin, Willie Roaf, Andre Reed and Jerry Kramer
CM PUNK IS MY HERO
Canal Chronicles resident Steelers Fan

by WVPiratesfan on Sep 13, 2011 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Trust

I don’t like this option for one reason and I hate to say this but, Pouncey doesn’t trust Legursky at RG.
After watching some of the replays where the ravens got pressure up the middle, it was when pouncey was too quick to help out Legursky to his right, leaving a gap up the middle. The only reason I could figure he would do this is he doesn’t trust his RG to hold his block on his own…I don’t remember him doing that so much last year…
Hodge pointed it out when he was on M&M yesterday, the Ravens weren’t running anything exotic, just a simple stunt, and Pouncey missed his block because he moved over to help Legursky.
You can see exactly what I’m talking about in this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXYuSOES1a4

I think they should re-sign Floszell and put Essex back in at RG…just my 2 pennies

by mjcutri on Sep 13, 2011 10:45 AM EDT reply actions  

+2

Great call…I think you’re right. That’s comforting.

by Neal Coolong on Sep 13, 2011 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

good observation

I’d guess the Steelers plan was to double Ngata when Pouncey felt it necessary and it didn’t take long for the Ravens to figure this out and hold Suggs for a second or two.

This is a separate issue, but it seemed to me that Ben had an unusually long wind up to his throws, giving the cue to the Ravens D line to get their hands in the air.

by stylepoints on Sep 13, 2011 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good analysis

If Flozell can be had, I think that’s the solution. Also, with a line that’s in transition, I think it’s important to have a center who can read the defense well, make all the calls, and help others know their assignments. Far and away, Pouncey is the best guy for that.

That said, I DID enjoy the creativity Neal had in posting this, and suspect Pouncey COULD be a solid LT if he wanted to.

So does your line alignment have Flozell at left or right tackle, and if it’s left, is Gilbert at right tackle next to Essex?

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Sep 13, 2011 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's really painful

to think about Bryant McKinnie walking in off the street to play (at an apparently high level) for Baltimore when we’re having trouble populating our T spots with healthy bodies.

Pretty interesting stuff, though I’ve always been a fan of Flozell. I think he and Gilbert remain the best options.

by foremania on Sep 13, 2011 10:46 AM EDT reply actions  

It is

And I agree with you, but he was going against a far-below-healthy Harrison. Not saying he’s not better than expected, but let’s see how he does the next couple games before we assume that was more about McKinnie than Harrison’s health.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Sep 13, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice idea, but the interior is already weak.

Removing Pouncey from the interior could be disasterous. While he and Colon are very similar, I don’t think moving him outside is a great idea.

For one, he is much better than Legursky, the Super Bowl notwithstanding. Green Bay’s defensive strength is the outside despite their hulk inside, so the focus wasn’t on the interior of the Steelers’ O-line. But I wouldn’t want that combination week-in and week-out, especially against a team with agressive inside guys.

I think the better option, especially since we have two games in a row here we should win handily — Seattle and a Peyton-less Indy — would be to throw Gilbert into the fire — but not at RT.

LT – Gilbert
LG – Kemo
C – Pouncey
RG – Essex
RT – Scott

Scott is a serviceable LT, but he’s not the long-term answer. Gilbert needs game experience, and better to do it now than against a team with a killer pass rush — I know, I know, the Colts still have Freeney, so that’s why we start him against the ’Hawks so he can get his feet wet and we can see what he has to offer.

As for RG, I think Legursky was a liability in week one. I am willing to abandon the experiment in favor of a guy who has started and played pretty decent at RG for us in the past. Essex is pretty decent and is a whole lotta human being to plug a hole that was filled more often by Haloti Ngata than by Doug Legursky in week one.

The other option is to sit Scott entirely and bring in Flozell. Those are the only two options I really like, though; the two worst-performing positions on the o-line in week one were LT and RG.

by Mike Frazer on Sep 13, 2011 11:16 AM EDT reply actions  

It sounds like Gilbert is the LT of the future but I don’t want a rookie protecting Roethlisberger’s blind side. I agree that Legursky should be replaced but we’ve seen what Essex is and decent is not a word I would describe him. Put in Foster, who for some reason, has fallen off the face of the earth.

Proud fan of Pittsburgh's professional sports teams and the Pirates too.

by Black&GoldTrain on Sep 13, 2011 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

The problem is RT and LT are two very different positions

He’ll get experience against NFL DLs but I’d rather have him learn LT from the start rather than have to learn RT and then switch a year later. Like I said, it’s at least worth a try against Seattle. :)

Then again, putting Deebo on the O-line is “worth a try” because it wouldn’t HURT the play of the OL. We already know he can snap it half a mile (if you recall that ill-fated stint at LS against the Giants several years ago).

by Mike Frazer on Sep 13, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

legursky

hey guys, let’s give Legs a little breathing room here, and remember that he was going up against arguably the best DL in the NFL last week. remember in the Suberbowl when he did a serviceable job against BJ Raji who went into the game on a hot streak? In fact, we barely heard Raji’s name the entire game… I’m going to withhold judgment on his potential at RG until after the next 2-3 games…

by WestCoastSteel on Sep 14, 2011 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

My strategy for the OL

Abandon all hope of them being even decent.

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Sep 13, 2011 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

You sure do have a sunny disposition

Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...

by StoneColdSteel on Sep 13, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was better until Colon went on IR.

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Sep 13, 2011 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know

Let’s put the blocking sled out there as our O-Line. Maybe the opposing D would just think it is practice and push the sled straight ahead. We could then have BB play in shotgun and step out of the sled’s way. Problem solved ;)

Things can always be worse....

by ncmt40 on Sep 13, 2011 11:27 AM EDT reply actions  

First Post

Been reading for a long time, but this my first post.

Regarding this thread, I don’t agree with moving Pouncey. I believe the backups in place need to get the job done now, and if they can’t, then Tomlin didn’t pick the right backups. If we sign a veteran, he shouldn’t be starting for the next 2 games, so we need to test our backups that were chosen (out of practices and preseason) to make the roster.

Sometimes it is just a bad matchup that makes an offensive line look bad. We shouldn’t over-react to a bad game by moving multiple players around.

The team didn’t play well at all, but the reason this was a blowout can be pinned on one player – Big Ben. Ben has and always will have games like this; poor awareness, telegraphing his passes and terrible passing accuracy, I’m not advocating getting rid of him (he does enough to make up for these few games he sucks in), but we will always have to live with these type of games a couple times per season. 3 interceptions, 2 fumbles, and a late handoff resulting in a fumble, all in 1 game. At least 2 interceptions were with no one around him and throwing the ball right to the other team in a position which we were likely to score from. These plays were the turning point of the game. A good day by Ben and we are calling our O-line adequate.

by ballparkfranks on Sep 13, 2011 11:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, Ben threw four picks

But keep a few things in mind:

1) The deflection that was picked was a result of Legursky getting manhandled by Ngata and pushed into the backfield, where a very deft swat knocked the ball into the air. Not Ben’s fault.

2) The fumbled exchange was because Legursky never even laid a hand on Ngata, who was in the backfield almost in time to take the handoff himself.

3) The late fumble should have been challenged, because Ben’s arm had gone almost 3 inches forward. It was also a blind-side strip that occurred way too quickly for Ben to even know it was happening. Though challenging would have accomplished nothing as far as the outcome of the game, it would have told his players he was fighting to the end too. To that end, I fault Tomlin for giving up.

4) Ben should have read Ed Reed on the INT at the goalline, yes. But at the moment the ball flew, Reed was moving the other direction. His ability to change direction so quickly was what created the INT.

5) Ben was running for his life the entire game. I don’t blame him for trying to make something of nothing when it seemed like no one else was trying.

Of the six turnovers he was involved in, I would fault him in only two of the picks and chalk one up to a pretty doggone good play by Ed Reed. But when he was under pressure by the third step of his drop on almost every passing play, I can’t say he was the primary cause of those, either. Only the one where he absolutely blew the throw (the first of Reed’s picks) can I say is 100% on him.

by Mike Frazer on Sep 13, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

regarding

1) The deflection that was picked was a result of Legursky getting manhandled by Ngata and pushed into the backfield, where a very deft swat knocked the ball into the air. Not Ben’s fault.

This is now the second critical occurrence of the same! Is that just dumb luck or what?

by SteelersVT on Sep 13, 2011 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Passes get deflected at the line a lot

That two have been picked is, I would have to say, dumb luck. My opinion, though.

by Mike Frazer on Sep 13, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

According to Gerry Dulac of the Post-Gazette
It appears the solution to replace Willie Colon at right tackle is to move rookie No. 2 Marcus Gilbert into that role.

Gilbert is the backup left tackle, but he will be moved to the right side and is expected to start there against the Seattle Seahawks, I was told this morning.

The Steelers have thought abouyt brining back Flozell Adams, who was their starting right tackle in 2010. But Adams, apparently, wants too much money to play this season and the Steelers aren’t willing to pay that amount.

Max Starks, their starting left tackle last season before he was injured, is not an option, either. Starks is not in shape after sustaining a neck injury last season.

by worldtrip on Sep 13, 2011 11:55 AM EDT reply actions  

I hope Flozell likes his couch.

"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter

by John Stephens on Sep 13, 2011 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gilbert

Of all the in-house possibilities he would be my choice. Let the guy get his feet wet and learn on the job. Sure it might be risky but giving him the experience now will benefit him and the Steelers down the line. The Steelers will have a very inexperienced right side of the line though. That is worrisome.

If it was LT I could see the Steelers moving Pouncey there but not RT. Also I’m not in favor of starting Legursky anywhere on the line. Sure he had a nice SB but so far that hasn’t been the norm for him when he starts.

Proud fan of Pittsburgh's professional sports teams and the Pirates too.

by Black&GoldTrain on Sep 13, 2011 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the comment WT

I like moving Gilbert over to the RT spot. Lets see what our 2nd rd. pick can do. Sure hoping he can pull a pouncey and be a Pro bowler as a rookie! But being servicable may have to do for this year.

by steeler fever on Sep 13, 2011 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

I said it more than a year ago

Pouncey is the second-coming of Bruce Matthews. He’s a five-position OL.

by theobserver on Sep 13, 2011 12:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Too bad he couldn’t play them all at the same time.

Proud fan of Pittsburgh's professional sports teams and the Pirates too.

by Black&GoldTrain on Sep 13, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

If they could have only gotten his twin last draft

that be like 40% of the line being Pounceys.

If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.

by SNW on Sep 13, 2011 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Time.

I think it’s time to sign somebody on the cheap. Flozell or Starks should be willing to sign for 2 mil, since 31 other teams didn’t call. Hopefully, if it’s internal, it’s Gilbert, not Es-sucks.

by twault on Sep 13, 2011 12:19 PM EDT reply actions  

It's time

For one of these guys to beat the man in front of them. Win the battle and get the QB’s confidence back.

Ben is rattled by this diaster.

by delisixburgh on Sep 13, 2011 12:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Interesting proposal

Here’s my take… Pouncey is smart and needs to anchor that middle and make the line calls. Can’t move him.

Legs looked bad on Sunday, he needs to step it up.
Colon looked good and its a shame he’s out again.
LG and C played ok, LT played weak.

I’d say move J. Scott to RT, plug Gilbert in right now at his future position of LT and lets give it a shot. If it doesn’t work, switch the tackles back

The other option is to put Isaac Redman in at RT.

by Mechem on Sep 13, 2011 12:39 PM EDT reply actions  

No

But we could “fumble” every snap, and he could then pick it up and run for a touchdown. Probably average about 60 yards a carry.

On passing plays, just leave Pouncey in there to snap it, have Redman just stare down the defensive line to keep them frozen, and throw if 40 yards to Wallace or Brown.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Sep 13, 2011 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I said the same thing above

With the added change of putting Essex at RG. I think Scott lacks the athleticism to consistently handle top-tier pass rushers on the blind side, but I think he has the size to play well at RT. Get Gilbert into the game now — if Pouncey can come in as a rook and not just play center, but be responsible for all the line calls from day one, then Gilbert can come in and block the crap outta some pass rushers.

And Isaac Redman doesn’t need a line to block for him.

by Mike Frazer on Sep 13, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Be careful

If biggcat hears you saying anything positive about Colon, he’ll scream and curse.

Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...

by StoneColdSteel on Sep 13, 2011 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Load noises!

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 13, 2011 2:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

That would be creepy

"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty." - Winston Churchill

by PixburghArn on Sep 13, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hearing him talk negatively about everything will cause you to have emergency brain surgery

Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...

by StoneColdSteel on Sep 13, 2011 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree that Pouncey could play Guard as well as center.

But I’d rather see him stay where he is. We need a guy who’s durable and can develop as the season goes on.

by Billy52 on Sep 13, 2011 12:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Where is Hills

He’s been unemployed for all of 1 week now.

by steelerwheeler on Sep 13, 2011 2:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Did Denver cut him?

If you buy a foreign made product you give money to a person who will not be buying an American made product that you get paid to make. Think about it next time you're at the store.

by SNW on Sep 13, 2011 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm more worried about Legursky

at RG than I am about Gilbert at RT. Ngata killed him — tossed him like a rag doll. I like Foster or Essex, either one at RG.

If Kugler makes any of this shit work, they ought to double his pay.

"Wins and losses are black and white and it’s pure, it’s purity." -Mike Tomlin

"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -Jack Lambert, 1990 HoF Introduction

by madanthonywayne on Sep 13, 2011 9:36 PM EDT reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Your all time Steeler regret?
5467103_small
Hines Ward: a different look part 1. Hines vs. the big boys.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Isaac Redman 2012: Should we temper our expectations?
Photo_small
Worry Warts
6-trophies_small
The Saint Will Be The Starter for 2012 - The Whole Season.
Trophies_small
Why Is Rashard Mendenhall Still On This Roster?
2009-week6_1440x900_benroethlisberger_small
Pads - To wear or not to wear
Small
53 Man Roster (Way too early edition)
Small
WHEN DO TICKETS GO ON SALE?
Small
Submitted for your approval: Steeler names for this year's pledge class
Small
The biggest offseason ever

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo