Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Mechem's Recap of the Colts Game


I've decided to add another regular bit to my posting. I provide you with hate in our weekly hate guide. But now I'd like to offer my thoughtages about our weekly performances. And just some of my observations in general. And of course, what I hated and stank.

 

Lets first off look at some of what I loved. Remember, everything good in moderation, even HATE. I'm really all about the love. Its the Yin to my Yang, the Cheech to my Chong, the Judas to my Jesus, and the Beer to my Glass.

Star-divide

 

This week there were only 3 things I loved:

 

1. Mike Wallace

Seriously, MW is just basically manbearpig in a football uniform. I'm super serial. He's insane. The man made some good catches, and the long ball was a beauty. The Colts responded with more tight coverage in the second half but he still put a couple good first downs in there. He's definitely our now #1 whether or not it's official. And we should treat him as such.

 

2. The Defense

People might think our D did poorly. But when you consider the situation, they played very well. Twice the Colts had possessions at or inside our 50 from turnovers. Our D tightened the screws in both cases and kept the Colts to field goals. This is pretty solid considering that Vinateiri in the dome can probably nail those from the 35 yard line consistantly.

Besides that, you have one TD drive. That's it. The pass defense was quite solid, and got lucky in a couple cases. The Run D was suspect, but I would say that it made a lot of good stops and some tackles for losses. A lot of the big runs came when I think the D was expecting pass late in the game. The Colts like to run out of some pass looking formations and switched sides several times, keeping their run calls clever.

In the end, our D did what it always does: It gave us a chance to win. No other D would have kept a team to 20 points with a pick 6 and 2 other turnovers in prime position. And how many D's would have gone and made the key pick six to give our team a real chance at a win?

 

3. Big Ben

If Paul Bunyon and Wonder Woman had a baby, and Hercules and Catwoman had a baby, and somehow those two babies had a baby, that'd be Ben Roethlisberger. The dude played ball today. He threw for a pile, was mostly very accurate, and took a beating and never missed a beat. Ben wasn't afraid to run a bit and pick up some tough yards. In most cases he didn't even think about going down, and took hard hits in and out of the pocket. As usual he did his amazing sandlot stuff a few times down the stretch and showed he's a tough guy to bring down. After a while I thought about it, and he only got ''sacked'' once aside from the strips. He does need to work on protecting the ball when passing a little. And maybe he should have ran more because in one strip he could have probably come close to the first. But live by the sword die by it, today he let us live.

 

Now here's what I hated and what stanked (possible profanitation present)

 

1. The Oh-line.

Oh shit is more like it. Dear god that may have been one of the worst days for the O-line since the Eagles game in 2008. And that was basically a completely different group. This was by far the worst game for these linemen. Scott was about as useful as sandpaper when you're on the crapper. I also noticed that Kemo and Scott seemed to be constantly turned around by the spin moves. They were literally facing the wrong way several times. I don't understand how anybody could be so badly faked out that they end up looking at their own endzone. 

The run blocking was weak and timid and nobody really seemed to find a guy and take him out. Many people missed guys, although I didn't see anybody mandhandled too hard. It just seemed uncoordinated.

Gilbert had a long day, but I think did pretty well. The Ben fumble from Gilberts side really wasn't all Gilberts fault. The Ben had about 5-6 seconds and still had the ball.

Scott was also a gaping moron and basically just watched the Colts return that fumble for a TD. He could have possibly got to the ball. It's amazing considering the events in the 2010 AFC playoff game.

The injuries weren't good either. The only good I can say is that they didn't fumble a snap and there were only a couple penalties. A sad day here. Something must be done.

 

2. Manny Sanders

I love this guy but god today I hated him and he stanked. The dude seemed like he was back in college or something. Honestly just an all around lack of performance here. Considering the drop early on the first drive that possibly could have led to 7 points, the failure to touch the interceptor in the 2nd, and lack of blitz recognition, he really didn't do anything to help us at all today. He didn't seem very focused which is strange considering he's said to be great with the playbook and a stellar route runner. He needs to get his head in the game and step it up or he won't be able to keep up. Brown should definitely pass him on the depth chart.

 

3. Play calling on offense

We should have had a lot more points today. We frankly got pretty lucky with a long Wallace bomb and a great defensive TD. First off, the run game wasn't workin much and they refused to change it up. Mendenhall was dancing all day and nearly fumbled another ball. No Redman for miles. Moore played well on his two carries, again showing it's good to change backs up at times. But worse yet was the pass calling. Ben had a great day and made a lot of lemonade out of a hell of a lot of piss today.  But numerous play calls showed almost no adjustment to the blitz schemes. Any screens were really just improv dump offs, despite the fact that if they had been planned they may have been really successful. No hot routes to counter-act the blitzing at all. Not a single bubble screen or end around or designed roll out, just vanilla style all day.

When your O line is getting beat like Charlie Sheens girlfriend, you need to start getting creative to make the defense back off a bit. We basically gave the D line a red carpet reception to blitz the bejeeballs out of us.

 

4. Ball spotting

Ok here's one more thing. I don't normally like to hate on the refs and I feel they called a very fair game and we even got away with a couple. But what the hell was up with those ball spots during the game? The Colts on their tying TD drive DEFINITELY got a freebie first down. And it was no wonder they hurried up and ran it. On another occasion earlier I remember a very questionable one being given also with no measurement at all. I never saw the chain gang the entire game. And a couple of ours seemed to be a little short.

 

You're on notice ball spotter. Spot the ball right or James Harrison will spot your balls on the correct line leaving you balless.

 

Those are some of the things that have plagued us for a long time, and yet somehow we pulled it off. This game was eerily reminiscent of the week 4 Baltimore game in 2008. In that game we suffered from some early mistakes, had trouble on offense, but in the end the D made a play and we won it in a gritty game. I'm hoping that's what this was. And hopefully we can continue to put it together. Really this season kinda reminds me of 2008 again. At least these first weeks. A solid win, an ugly ugly loss, and a gritty win. Add a budding fast deep threat WR, a vicious defense saving games, and an O-line that couldn't block a geriatric cripple, and you can see the similarities.

 

I'm hoping we can get it together sooner rather than later. But a W is a W, and we kept pace with the Purple Browns and Brown Browns. The fact we're all 2-1 is probably indicative of the end of the world in 2012, but nonetheless it's good to be on top. Even if the top in this case is a 3-some with the worlds two ugliest women.

 

Until next week. Please feel free to comment on the issues here, anybody you Loved or Hated? Lets hear it!

Comment 20 comments  |  Add comment  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Now here’s what I hated and what stanked (possible profanitation present)

The very next line

Oh shit is more like it.

by Steel34D on Sep 26, 2011 1:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Spot on!

I also have a question about Suisham. If he doesn’t hit that ball against the upright, the ending would have been much calmer. But we can’t be too mad at him, the guy converted in a really really clutch situation. I also loved it how Ben dove to the left on the final snap before the FG to put the ball on the left hash.

About the Oh-Line, I grew to expect this, and, I think, so did Ben and the rest of the Steelers. The unit was not very good to begin with, and started the game with 2 linemen that were backups at the seaon’s start. Then they also went down, so we essentially played with 2 3rd-stringers. Kudos to Ben for piling up that yardage in a situation like this.

And help me out here – isn’t running outside the asnwer to this kind of Oh-Line play? That seemed such a logical thing for me, especially given that Mendenhall bounced outside more than a few time after absorbing a hit down the middle.

Life's a journey, not a destination.

by kliuch on Sep 26, 2011 2:52 AM EDT reply actions  

but everyone else runs on them, and they were determined to plug up the middls

by GDEUCE on Sep 26, 2011 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Colts are a fast team

They know how to set the edge so that is why running on the outside wouldn’t be effective. it is my belief that Arians tried this in hopes that Freeney and Mathis were playing the pass all day.

by Steel34D on Sep 26, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Completely agreed on the poor playcalling

Seeing Moore in there late running well, when you knew we were running, simply reaffirmed the fact that we did poorly not to try to work Redman and Moore in there earlier. I did like some of the quick drops, but it seemed we got caught chasing fools’ gold in that 1st quarter. Ben throwing for 179 yards, I believe, while we were unable to establish a running game probably should have signaled the coming difficulties.

On this, something small I have noticed is that we seem to somewhat tip our running plays by having our WRs/TEs cover each other up on running plays, thus making it an illegal formation if we were to throw. Strange…

If you want more ammo for the ‘poor spotting’ aspect. I do not remember the exact timing, but I recall watching a Colts punt go out of bounds, in line with the camera, at about the 23 yard line, landing about five or six yards deep at the time . Simple geometry caused me to estimate that we might actually get decent field position for the first time in awhile around the 30 or a little bit further. As it was, I was rather perplexed when they marked it at the 23…

"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."

-- so says Rex Ryan.

by sctx109 on Sep 26, 2011 7:50 AM EDT reply actions  

The punt in question

was at the end of the 3rd quarter. Will have to check again later.

I also note that I wonder if the problems with the rush defense, other than Aaron Smith, also has to do with Farrior failing to fill the gap like he used, and on which our defensive scheme is predicated. This was brought into sharp relief by the play of Angerer on the inside for the Colts last night.

"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."

-- so says Rex Ryan.

by sctx109 on Sep 26, 2011 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Farrior

was on the sideline a bunch last night, with Foote in for him

People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee

by stillergorillar on Sep 26, 2011 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Angerer had lots of help from the secondary -safeties – plugging the holes, especially in the 2nd half (this means to take nothing away from an outstanding game by the Colts LB). This is in contrast with our safeties who, if they line up at or near the line of scrimmage, usually come off the edge.

Life's a journey, not a destination.

by kliuch on Sep 26, 2011 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed on both comments

I probably am focusing on a handful of plays by Angerer where there was a gap, and he closed it down. I recall schematic discussions on this board where the idea is for the ILBs to generally do the same. I will need to re-watch, and yes Foote was in there for Farrior and this is not to say he is an improvement, but only that, in the past, Farrior seemed to cover some of those gaps, now he cannot, and we begin to see problems.

I really want to see where Timmons was, though maybe someone has insight there.

"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."

-- so says Rex Ryan.

by sctx109 on Sep 26, 2011 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree on everything.

My biggest surprise (and not in a good way..) was The Next Great 88. He made a big, big rookie mistake post-INT and his own drop was inexcusable. Time to get back to fundamentals, #88.

HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."

by 1BlkGldFan on Sep 26, 2011 7:59 AM EDT reply actions  

It happens.

And I am actually happy it happened. Remember how Mendenhall responded after Tomlin put him in the doghouse for the Cincy game 2 years ago? Next game he established himself as the Steelers’ starting RB. I hope Sanders will follow his example, teammates should help him do it right.

Life's a journey, not a destination.

by kliuch on Sep 26, 2011 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

#88

Posted on his facebook that he has watched the game 3 times already and won’t make any excuses.

That’s a good thing because he made a couple of rookie mistakes that he didn’t even make as a rookie.

All is forgiven…. unless he pulls that shit again. lol

HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."

by 1BlkGldFan on Sep 26, 2011 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

a similar rookie mistake

Last year he hit the ground a couple yards short of the end zone, and just laid there. Even though he hadn’t been touched by an opposing player, he believed that the play was dead. You would think that a coach would have drilled the necessity of contact into his head back then, so that he wouldn’t make a similar bone-headed mistake this year as well. So either our coaching isn’t up to snuff, or Sanders is worryingly thick-skulled.

by Weirtonite on Sep 26, 2011 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

If i see that

quick pass to a WR behind the line again..i’m going to lose it
there are 3 possible outcomes, with two being more likely
1) receiver gets hit as soon as he catches it, possibly creating a fumble/int, but almost always resulting in a loss of yards
2) interception for touchdown
3) they shake the first man, gain 3-5 yards

for you stats people on here…if you’re bored, please research the effectiveness of this ridiculous play call that they are so dedicated to
I don’t mind being proven wrong.

by FrankWyt on Sep 26, 2011 8:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Correct me if I am wrong

But unless 1-2 yards is in fact what is needed, these checkdowns are by necessity more often than by design.

Life's a journey, not a destination.

by kliuch on Sep 26, 2011 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

no…they are designed plays, not checkdowns
there is no option, the ball is snapped, and quickly gotten rid of to a receiver that has dropped about 1-2 yards behind the line of scrimmage

by FrankWyt on Sep 26, 2011 9:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

Now, they have been successful in the past, in fact one only needs to look at how the Colts used those plays to keep us off-balance in the first half. However, when they become a core part of the offense instead of a ploy, well, they go the way of the Wildcat… especially against a quick defense.

"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."

-- so says Rex Ryan.

by sctx109 on Sep 26, 2011 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

They in fact are running plays

A run play is called and if Ben doesn’t like the look and a corner is playing off, he throws it out to the wing. If the reviever can make the corner miss, its a pretty big gainer. Its happened plenty of times. They call’em run game sustitutes.

by HardPunkKore on Sep 26, 2011 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not the Oh-Line; It's the "Uh-O-Line."

Scott was about as useful as sandpaper when you’re on the crapper.

Disagree. Sandpaper on the crapper has some potential uses (making sure the toilet seat does not yield splinters, filing your nails), while Scott has no conceivable worthwhile use.

None.

by BuccoFan21 on Sep 26, 2011 4:15 PM EDT reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Your all time Steeler regret?
5467103_small
Hines Ward: a different look part 1. Hines vs. the big boys.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Isaac Redman 2012: Should we temper our expectations?
Photo_small
Worry Warts
6-trophies_small
The Saint Will Be The Starter for 2012 - The Whole Season.
Trophies_small
Why Is Rashard Mendenhall Still On This Roster?
2009-week6_1440x900_benroethlisberger_small
Pads - To wear or not to wear
Small
53 Man Roster (Way too early edition)
Small
WHEN DO TICKETS GO ON SALE?
Small
Submitted for your approval: Steeler names for this year's pledge class
Small
The biggest offseason ever

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo