Steelers 23, Colts 20: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
It's been nearly 24 hours since the Pittsburgh Steelers won their Week 3 matchup on the road against the Indianapolis Colts, 23-20. Steeler Nation, the spoiled bunch that it is, was less than impressed by the six-time Super Bowl champions' performance against the supposedly lowly Colts. But as I noted in my post-game notes, there was more to be pleased by than one would be led to believe. That said, there definitely were some 'bad' elements, and at times the play was downright 'ugly'. So in honor of one of my all-time favorite movies, let's take a look at 'The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly' from Week 3.
The Good
- Wide Reciver Play: At the outset of the 2011 season, analysts and fans alike raved about the potential of the Steelers WRs to really cause opposing defenses headaches. The offense is very much still a work in progress, but the play of the wideouts is certainly not what's holding the unit back. On Sunday night, Mike Wallace posted his sixth consecutive 100-plus yard receiving game in the regular season with his five reception, 144 yard performance. His 81-yard TD catch on the Steelers' third offensive series was absolutely gorgeous, and proof positive that there is no more dangerous receiver in the National Football League. On any given play, No. 17 is a threat to take it to the house. Second-year WR Antonio Brown meanwhile played an equally solid game. Brown hauled in four passes for 75 yards, three of which moved the chains on third down situations. The former Central Michigan record setter was equally valuable in the return game. He averaged over 16 yards per punt return on his four opportunities, highlighted by a 37 yarder in the fourth quarter that should have led to points. Hines Ward has yet to play a huge factor in any of the first three games, but he did catch three passes for 17 yards , including an 11-yarder on a 2nd and 4 play early on in the Steelers' game-winning drive.
- Mewelde Moore: The cagey veteran was the catalyst on Pittsburgh's final drive. After not seeing much action at all in the first two weeks, or for most all of Week 3 for that matter, Moore was thrust into action in the fourth quarter after Rashard Mendenhall had been rendered ineffective all night. Moore sprung a 22-yard gain on a nicely designed pass play where Antonio Brown ran a slant and picked the Colts safety off from taking a clean angle at Moore. His two rushes of five and four yards kept the Steelers in manageable situations in that final drive. While it would be nice to see Isaac Redman and Mendenhall keep Moore on the bench with their outstanding play, the reality is that the Steelers are going to be find themselves in some tight games moving forward where a trusted veteran like Moore will come in handy. It's nice to know he's still got enough juice in his legs to make the plays that are there for the taking.
- James Harrison: Harrison still looks like he's got a bit of stamina and strength to recover, but no longer is Steeler Nation concerned about Deebo's back and whether he'll be able to play at a high level. Or at least nobody should be concerned. Harrison was downright nasty for most of the game. He shed blockers in the running game and stuffed Addai in his tracks, and though he didn't record a sack until late in the fourth quarter, he hurried Kerry Collins into lots of throws he would have liked to have had another split second to step into. As for that huge strip-sack of Curtis Painter -- well, that's what Harrison does. No player in the NFL has forced as many fumbles as Harrison has since 2007 (26). Amazing player.
- Troy Polamalu: I can't tell you how important it is to see No. 43 seemingly back at full strength making football plays all over the field. He was great in run support, he timed his blitzes perfectly, and he was solid in pass coverage, both helping out and the lone time he was matched up in one-on-one coverage. Forget about the fact that Pittsburgh has some issues across the roster -- every team in the NFL does. Steelers fans seem to forget that, but it's absolutely true. What every team can't stake a claim to is having two dynamic players like Polamalu and Harrison that you can't entirely account for with a well-crafted game plan. The fact that Polamalu is healthy and making plays is absolutely the most important development of the young 2011 season for Pittsburgh.
The Bad
- Emmanuel Sanders: As good as most of the wide receivers were, I can't include Emmanuel Sanders in that group. The second-year WR out of SMU dropped a perfectly thrown pass inside the Colts' five yard line on the opening series of the game. Pittsburgh had to settle for 3. Sanders did have one really nice grab on a 3rd and 18 play that extended a drive and allowed Pittsburgh to tie the game at 13-13 with a 44 yard Shaun Suisham field goal. But earlier in the contest, Sanders failed to down a Colts player by contact after Ben Roethlisberger's pass attempt was picked off. Sanders not only failed to touch the Colts player that was on the ground, he looked to be actively avoiding any sort of contact. Not good. The mistake ended up costing the Steelers 38 unnecessary yards of field position. Had he not made that mistake, the Colts probably don't get points. They quickly went three-and-out and had to settle for a short field goal.
- Rush Defense: We're accustomed to teams not being able to run the ball at all, so this is somewhat relative. But it was a bit disconcerting to see the Colts rush for 97 yards on 21 carries. There's no reason to be too alarmed though. Joseph Addai, who had 17 of those carries for 86 yards, had a long of just 11 on the night. He got past the line of scrimmage on several occasions, but the Steelers secondary did a fine job of stopping him in his tracks before he could rip off a huge run. Calling Aaron Smith and LaMarr Woodley? Where are you? We'll take a closer look at the tape to see what happened, but it seemed like much of the Colts success rushing the ball came to the right side where Woodley and Smith were playing. Give credit to Jeff Saturday as well for playing pretty darn well against Casey Hampton. Big Snack had his moments, but Saturday did a very commendable job keeping Hampton, who he calls the hardest player to play against in the running game, from blowing up the Colts rushing attack in between the tackles.
The Ugly
- Based on the knee-jerk reaction of many fans here and on Facebook and Twitter, you would think that the Steelers offensive line had just turned in a performance as inept as the eight-sack game against the Philadelphia Eagles early on in the 2008 season. Uh, not quite. Big Ben had tons of time to throw for much of the night, and by game's end had only been sacked three times. I don't have the official count on me either, but he was also not 'hit' or 'knocked down' by Dwight Freeney or Robert Mathis too many other times outside of those three sacks. Nevertheless, it's hard to not categorize the play of Jonathan Scott as ugly. The one play where he didn't even get a hand on Freeney which led to another strip-sack was certainly an ugly play. I'm inclined to think it was a miscommunication issue, but you can't allow that kind of mistake to happen. We'll see how serious his injury was, but if I had to guess, he's going to be out for an extended period of time.
- Daniel Sepulveda: You might not have noticed the punter's play in between all the other action, but Sepulveda failed to execute on all three of his punting opportunities. The first, which wasn't too bad, came on the Steelers second possession, up three and punting from the Indianapolis 40. Sepulveda didn't get much hangtime on the punt and the Colts fair caught the ball from the 10 yard line. Certainly not a terrible result, but unfortunately it was his best effort of the night. On his second punt, Sepulveda punted the ball into the endzone from 45 yards out. The ball toppled over with top-spin almost after it struck at around the five yard line. Got to do better than that. Finally on the third and final punt from the Pittsburgh 37, he botted the ball a mere 37 yards. Fortunately a holding penalty pushed the Colts back inside their own 20, but again, one job to do, got to do it better than that, especially on a team where the offense is going to make its fair share of mistakes and put the defense in compromising situations. The Steelers will need better play from Sepulveda and the rest of the special teams units if they want to overcome that inconsistency on offense.
- Run Game: Better save some stuff to talk about for the remainder of the week, but suffice it to say that the Steelers' rushing attack was ugly on Sunday night. Rashard Mendenhall maybe danced a bit too much on a play or two, but the bottom line is he had very little room to operate all evening. The end result was an 18-carry, 37-yard night. One of those 18 totes went for 15 yards, which for us non-math majors means his other 17 attempts went for a grand total of 22 yards. I'll save some of why I think the running game has yet to get going for later in the week, but as Tony Dungy noted in the pregame show, and based on what we saw transpire in 2009, the Steelers' are not likely to fulfill their potential as a team if they're one-dimensional and throw too much (either from an inability to run or from Bruce Arians' natural penchant to pass).
42 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice write up Michael.
My dad always told me “don’t ever bet money on the Steelers because they’ll break your heart.” I hate that I always listened to him…. I could easily be 10 financial years closer to retirement with all of the Debbie Downers I could have taken money from.
HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."
Huh? The Steelers have won 6 Super Bowls and been to 3 in the last 6 years. They have one of if not the best records in the NFL over the last 20 years. I don’t think betting against them is a good idea.
They haven’t broken too many hearts lately.
My Dad was a fan during the "lean" years.... pre-SB, Joe Greene etc..
He always believed; but never won… after they started winning in the 70’s he never bet on them again (superstitions) and was content to see them just win.
HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."
Just cuz we won...
Doesnt mean we covered the spread… We didnt even come close on sunday night
"Never said I'm first to put the 'Burgh up on the map, I'm more like Mike Tomlin here to bring da 'Burgh back... Khalifa man."
by RoethlisCrosby on Sep 27, 2011 6:54 AM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions
this
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Sep 27, 2011 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions
i see you aren’t a betting man
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Sep 27, 2011 8:18 AM EDT up reply actions
THANK YOU!!!
Sanity. Finally. I appreciate your if solely for the fact that you accentuated the fact that WINNING matters most.
I am sure many of us became Steeler fans because that is what this has consistently for the last two decades…WIN.
by Charlieb60 on Sep 26, 2011 11:11 PM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
Honest, Balanced Analysis
Michael, as always an excellent job. And while Silverback remains a work in progress, let me say that I questioned your assurances that he’d recover during the NFL season a few weeks back.
Thus far events are proving you to be right, and me wrong. I hope things continue that way.
As for Sanders, you’re right to call him out, but these are kinds of mistakes that will correct itself.
Regarding the line play, you’re right, this was not the ‘08 Philly game (which I missed), but I tend to look at it the way Al Everest looks at special teams. If the line is giving up potentially game saving “sack-strips” that tends to be what we’ll focus on, and with some (although not complete) justification.
At the end of the day, while I think you do put up a fair, and balanced analysis, I come down on the side that says the Steelers escape from Indy with far more questions than answers.
But I will be very happy to say in a few weeks time, “You know Michael, your optimism was justified.” (Good pick up on Dan Sepulveda, BTW.)
The running game is also a concern, and although I did not write about it in my post, I am worried that Mendenhall has plateaued. Enough for one night. Off to bed.
by Hombre de Acero on Sep 26, 2011 11:21 PM EDT reply actions
Thats the coverage unit IMO
On his second punt, Sepulveda punted the ball into the endzone from 45 yards out. The ball toppled over with top-spin almost after it struck at around the five yard line. Got to do better than that.
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit."
--Aristotle
not on that punt
The gunners had no choice to down it. It bounced quickly into the endzone, no upwards or sideways bounce on it.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Sep 27, 2011 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions
I can't BELIEVE you brought up that Eagles game.
I was so close to forgetting that and now it’s all coming back. Dammit, Michael!
Scott was ugly
But as much as I generally have faith in Kugler/Tomlin, some of that was on them. He was playing incredibly high in his stance the whole night, and not sliding his feet. You do that against Freeney, or any other strong d-lineman who plays with great leverage, you’re going to get tossed all over the field, and be totally ineffective.
That lousy sort of play falls to coaching, and either he HASN’T learned better, or he has, but they didn’t pull him when he sucked, and reverted to bad habits. I was AMAZED at how bad his technique was most of the night.
Also, WHY didn’t they blitz people other than Troy on that drive where the Colts scored? That’s exactly what Lawrence Timmons is for.
"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will
they didnt blitz because
You force basically what is a rookie quarterback to march 80 yards and make multiple well executed throws to beat you rather than gambling and allowing him to just connect on one play that levels the score. Nothing wrong with that strategy. He made the plays. Troy almost made the play near the goal line when he shot the backfield. But it’s a game of inches and on that series we came up short and they came up big. Happens in the pros.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Sep 27, 2011 2:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Disagree
Although I see your point.
The problem was that they knew Troy was coming every play, designated someone to block him, and on several of those completed passes, he was trying to fight his way past a blocker. Not his forte; speed and surprise are.
Timmons, in contrast, is NEARLY as fast, outweighs Troy by 40 pounds, and can thump some of the guys who tied up The Samoan. And, the other team scored, so regardless of the theory behind it, the end result was non-optimal.
"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will
by lottwasgangsta on Sep 27, 2011 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
poor fundementals
I’m seeing it all over the league where players are struggling with the basics of blocking, tackling, and having the proper pad level. It shows up doubly on marginal players like J. Scott. Yes it is a coaching issue, but I think the real problem is the new CBA. There are things that cannot be taught except in full pads, and all coaches are hand cuffed this year by having severe limitations on the number and length of padded practices allowed. It makes the players safer, but it decreases the quality of the games.
Mewelde
Michael, I don’t know about you, but as Mewelde more or less took over on that game-winning drive, I was having flashbacks to that MNF game against Baltimore in ’08 when he pretty much did the same thing.
He’s one of those Charlie Batch-type guys who people always want to write off during the offseason, believing he’s finished, but seems to justify his spot on the team at least once during the year.
Those who can...do.
Those who can't... post on message boards using a screen name boasting the name of those who can.
by Craig Sager's Wardrobe on Sep 27, 2011 3:10 AM EDT reply actions
yeah!
totally!
i’ll admit i was the first to advocate/hope for Baron Batch taking over his duties. but with the batch injury, i’m the first to admit my excitement that he’s yet again proved his doubters wrong and proved invaluable to the team.
homer j. once told me that he thinks tomlin views moore as someone very much similar to him — intelligent, well prepared, raised by good parents, an over achiever yet someone you can relate to. making more and more sense to me. loved his efforts in the game winning drive.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Sep 27, 2011 5:48 AM EDT up reply actions
ball control
Bouchette reported that Tomlin said Moore was in because it was their normal 2 minute offense, but Moore seems show up when Tomlin thinks holding on to the ball is at a premium, when there’s absolutely no room for [foul] ups.
So, from what I have heard on the Jonathan Scott whiff is that Ben busted the play that was supposed to be an HB draw. It looks like he called an audible and the left side of the line didn’t hear it. If you rewatch the play you can see that Kemo takes off down field to block at the second level. If Ben had gotten a pass off, it probably would have come back on an illegal man down field foul anyway. In the same vein, Scott looked like he was prepared to run block, but I guess at the last second realized it was a pass play. So, blame it not only on Scott, but on Ben and the crowd noise.
Also, I rewatched every snap of Aaron Smith’s last night and he was not as awful as I thought the whole game. Him and Casey Hampton were getting chop blocked a lot. I saw one or two that were extremely illegal and dangerous (Smith not even facing the direction of the guy who chopped the back of his legs). Anyway, Smith didn’t do horrible. However, he wasn’t good either. Maybe Keisel being out allowed them to cheat more on Smith’s side.
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
In re the chop blocking
maybe we need an enforcer. This is getting ridiculous. Maybe Kemo should be put into the defense to start some fights, and we could move Sylvester onto the O line to confuse the opposition…
"If you're not getting better, I don't care what business you're in, you're a dead man. I try to look critically at the mistakes that I make and try to learn from them, like our team does." - Mike Tomlin
by Rebecca Rollett on Sep 27, 2011 8:56 AM EDT up reply actions
chop blocks
I believe the saying is when in rome ………
"you will hardly know who I am or what I mean"-Walt Whitman
by Pittsblitz56 on Sep 27, 2011 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Chop as the Romans chop?
Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...
by StoneColdSteel on Sep 27, 2011 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Ha Ha Ha said Paul Bunyan
"you will hardly know who I am or what I mean"-Walt Whitman
by Pittsblitz56 on Sep 28, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
a player like Freeney needs a hat every play
even if it was a halfback draw, completely turning him loose like that would have resulted in a negative play even if it was a sprint draw around the right end. Players like him will almost always make the play coming from the backside. So yes the sack may have been because Ben called an audible, but I find it hard to believe that the blocking scheme called for Scott to block his imaginary friend “Tommy”.
that would explain a lot
Scott may not be great, but he’s not so bad where he doesn’t get a hat on people.
Freel free to email me anytime at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com with questions, suggestions, complaints, etc, or to just say what's up. -Michael Bean (Blitz)
by Michael Bean on Sep 27, 2011 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
The bad was the ugly
Overall a nice summary but….
The oline DID play terribly. An 8 sack nite was avoided by a lot of 3 step drops and the play of BR. But even then Ben accounted for 3 turnovers. That is way too much for any QB.
He played well enough to win though.
The ugly/bad- aside from the tackles getting manhandled, the interior line was a mess, never staying with a block and not getting to the second level when they needed too. Slot of that however was due to Mendy- in three games he must have had 7-8 near fumbles! That ball has not been secure and he is jitterbugging as soon as he gets the ball. Doubt it? Look at the final drive and ask yourself why Moore was soo successful and deliberate..
Aaron was a non factor, still and I hope he gets back to 2008 form- he got pushed around and out of gaps all nite, as did the rest of the d line. They could not set the edge and allowed the colts o-line to get to inside lb’s with consistency. Because of that farrior and foote were less effective requiring the safeties to cheat up. This game would have been very different had Peyton played.
Gay- that all I am going to say, had I been Collins/painter I would have targeted him a lot more.
No running game, plus the TOs mixed in with shaky run D and a weak nickel and dime package spells a blow out next weak. They had better get ready for the next team. I would love to see them roll Ben out more away from the pressure.
Unfortunately, the front office has not invested in the oline and we are playing with the worse personnel in 3 seasons going into week 4. They need the younger guys to to step up.
I am certainly worried about next week.
Not worried about Sanders
He deserves to be called out for his bad play, but I don’t think either problem will become a chronic. He hasn’t been one to drop passes historically. I’m not going to start calling him Sweed II. Also, you can bet he’s been couched upside the head regarding making contact with a defender turned runner. I doubt he does that again.
On the plus side of things, Sanders was good and open for that drop. I like receivers who get open. He was also ballin’ on special teams. I believe he nailed the return man at the start of the Colt’s first two drives.
"They eat fish and are majestic" - Great Sergios Ghost
Tonio Brown = UGLY
The next time Tonio Brown hops up and grandstands on a routine pass should be his last reception in Pittsburgh. Dude, just about all 10 other guys gotta do their job correctly for that play to work, PLEASE GET OVER YOURSELF!
by steelerwheeler on Sep 27, 2011 12:37 PM EDT reply actions
You should apply that last line to yourself as well
Pittsburgh Steelers fan - nuff said.
Miami Hurricanes fan - nuff said.
Georgetown Hoyas fan - nuff said.
Cleveland Cavaliers fan - um yeah, about that...
by StoneColdSteel on Sep 27, 2011 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions
What?
Now why? Because I like watching the Steelers play great as a team and when I make a comment about a self promoting jackass receiver you say I need to get over myself? You’re outta line there.
by steelerwheeler on Sep 29, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions
E. Bouchette just said he expects the Steelers to get thrashed by Houston ...
this week. People are talking about the lack of a running game here and are saying that they think Mendenhall is a big part of the blame. Everyone would like to see Mendy hit the hole a little harder, but where are the holes? Maybe that kill shot he took from Haoliti Gnata in game 1 has him a bit more hesitant attacking the line of scrimmage behind this offensive line, but I haven’t seen an abundant amount of running room for him either. The Colts were hitting him as soon as he got the ball, too.
The Texans are a good test for this team. I just wouldn’t want to be Ben with Trai Essex playing LT vs. Mario Williams. Then again, would you rather have J. Scott protecting your blindside against Williams or Essex? Kinda of like asking how do you want to die, firing squad or lethal injection. K. Colbert better get some OL (tackles and guards) out of this upcoming draft that are ready to play right away.
BTW, from the sounds of his press conference, the Steelers might be adding an extra OL to the practice squad this week. I could easily see G Ramon Foster in the starting lineup this week even if D. Legursky is healthy because the team doesn’t want all of its people who can play center in the lineup at the same time (Pouncey, Essex, & Legursky). The natural thing to do would be moving Foster to the starting lineup and keep Legursky as a swing lineman, if he is healthy enough to play. If not, then C John Malecki might be activated from the practice squad for this game. I would think that either Chris Scott or more likely T Jamon Meredith would be cut to make that happen for this game and then resigned next week.
by datruth4life2.0 on Sep 27, 2011 3:58 PM EDT reply actions
I agree and it makes me mad
This team had an opportunity to solidify a line that has been serviceable at best for the past 4 years despite that we were in 3 of the last 6 SB’s
This year absolutely no upgrades in the starters and the releases of both tackles only thinned the herd. Yes, I know we needed to get under the salary cap. However, you a have one of the top 6 QB’s in the league and probably the toughest QB in. The league period. Why,why,why?are we not investing in protecting this guy? If Ben goes down due to porous line play then the devil be damned! I want some ones job!,,,
Who can we sign with what little cap room we need?
I say bring the kid up Malecki! I saw enough of him to know he is at least- serviceable.
Agree
What crazy crazy crazy thoughts
Sanders is a keeper they got 3 guys who in the next 16 months when ward and miller retire will change the face of the offense forever.
Why would Miller retire
in the next sixteen months? He isn’t that old
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Sep 27, 2011 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Might be right
He definitely has more time on his clock.
He is only 28
He has two or three more good years of service.
People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee
by stillergorillar on Sep 29, 2011 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Good
Troy they set him loose on Painter he was all over the field lots of blitzes had to throw the kid off his game. Yeah he missed that hand off but how many other players would have even been close to missing.

by 


































