The Words of Free Agency Defined
Yesterday I did a post on Free Agents and possible solutions to the Steelers' roster needs. In the post I mention terms such as Unrestricted Free Agent (UFA) and Restricted Free Agent (RFA). It occurred to me that these terms might be foreign gibberish to some people and even if it wasn't many do not know how Free Agency and these work together. This post will outline the key terms in Free Agency and who the Steelers Free Agents are at the end with an example.
-Unrestricted Free Agent (UFA)-
An Unrestricted free Agent is a player that shall be completely free to negotiate and sign a Player Contract with any Club, and any Club shall be completely free to negotiate and sign a Player Contract with such player, without penalty or restriction, including, but not limited to, Draft Choice Compensation between Clubs or First Refusal Rights of any kind.
This means that a player can talk with any team about signing and any team can sign him. It is the players choice that is simple to understand right?
-Restricted Free Agent (RFA)-
A Restricted Free Agent get a little more complicated with how they work because of this I am not going to quote the actual legalese.
A Restricted Free Agent is a veteran play with three to four accrued season that contract is expired. The player is allowed to sign with any club but with restrictions. See the players original club has some helpful tool at their disposal.
- They have the First Right of Refusal basically the original club has the chance to match or better that offer. This tool is used if the club offers a deal to the player that is greater or equal to one year at, $1.01M or at least 110% of the player salary in prior year which every is greater.
- The club can also use Draft Choice Compensation (not an actual term but it kind of describes it the best). The first of these tenders is the Original Draft Round Compensation Tender which gives the original club a draft pick from the club that signs the player which is the original draft round of the player . This is used if the original club offers a contract the the player that is one year at, $1.01M or 110% salary of the final year of the player's contract, which every is greater. Basically if a team offers a contract at one year $1.01M or 110% of the final year salary to the player the original club has First Right of Refusal and Original Draft Round Compensation. There are a couple more tools used in RFA contract control.
- Second Round Compensation, as this sounds if another team signs the RFA the original club gets the second round pick of the team. This is used by the team offering a contract to the RFA that is one year and either $1.545M or at least 110% of the RFA salary in the final year of the contract which ever is greater.Basically if a team offers a contract at one year $1.545M or at least 110% of the final year salary to the player the original club has First Right of Refusal and Second Round Compensation.
- First Round Compensation, as this sounds if another team signs the RFA the original club receives a first round pick from that team. This is used by offering a contract of one year $2.198M or at least 110% of the player salary in the final year of the contract which ever is greater.
- First and Third Round Compensation, I think you got it so won't explain it. This is used by offering a contract that is one year $2.792M or at least 110% of the players salary in the final year of the players contract.
If the original club does not offer a tender then the RFA becomes a UFA.
-Exclusive Rights Free Agent (ERFA)-
If a player has no more then two accrued seasons then they can be an Exclusive Rights Free Agent. This means they player can not talk to any other team about a contract as long as the original club has offered a qualifying contract. A qualifying Contract is the veteran minimum for that player. So last year it was $375,000 for rookies, $450,000 for player with one accrued season and $525,000 for players with 2 accrued seasons.
There are two more tools a organization has to keep their players.
-The Franchise Tag-
One player may be designated a Franchise Player a year. Most people don't know that there are two types of Franchise Tags, Exclusive and Nonexclusive Franchise Tags.
Exclusive Franchise Tag-
The original club is the only club that is able to negotiate further contract talk for that year. If designated the player receives a one year contract with a salary of the average of the top five salaries at the position that year. (Calculated after the Free Agency period) or 120% of the players prior year salary, which every is greater.
Nonexclusive Franchise Tag-
This means the player has the right to talk with any club about a contract. However two First Round Draft Choices will be award to the original club if the player signs with another team. The team must tender the player a one year contract of the five largest salaries at the position of the prior year or 120% of the players prior year salary, which ever is greater.
-Transition Tag-
A team can use the Transition Tag on one player every year. It can be used with the Franchise Tag. The Club Receives Right of First Refusal of the player that is tagged. to use this the team must tender the player a one year contract with a salary that is the average of the ten largest of the year prior year at the position or 120% of the prior years contract, which ever is greater.
That was a lot of information wasn't it. Now lets look at the Steelers Free Agents as provided by Steelers.com.
- Unrestricted Free Agents-
|
Quarterbacks: |
Running Backs:
|
Wide Receivers: |
|
Defensive Linemen: |
Conerbacks: William Gay |
Specialists: Daniel Sepulveda |
Offensive Line:
Max Starks
Trai Essex
- Restricted Free Agents-
|
Tight Ends: David Johnson |
Wide Receivers: Mike Wallace |
Offensive Linemen: |
Defensive Backs: |
-Exclusive Rights Free Agents-
|
Running Back: Isaac Redmen |
Defensive Linemen: |
Specialists: |
Mike Wallace as an Example-
Mike Wallace is an RFA whose salary for 2011 was $710,168.00.
- To tender Wallace with a First and a Third round compensation it would cost the Steelers $2.792M because that amount is greater than 110% of Wallace's 2011 salary. ($781,184.80). It would also mean that should Wallace sign with another team they would receive that teams 1st and 3rd round pick in the 2012 draft.
- To tender Wallace with a Non Exclusive Farnchise Tag it would cost the Steelers $9.675M base off the top five salaries of WR last year. (L. Fitzgerald, Ca. Johnson, S. Smith, B. Marshall and A. Boldin. You can thank Fitzgeralds $20M base salary for driving up that number.) If Wallace signed with another team the other team would give the Steelers their 1st round pick in 2012 and 2013.
- If the Steelers do not offer a tender to Wallace he would become a Unrestricted Free Agent. Mike Wallace can also choose to not sign the tender and would not be subjected to a fined (not technically a holdout) but would lose a accrued season. He would also just not get paid and is allowed no where near a team's facilities.
There are a couple of other things such as compensation to original club for UFA that have signed with another team and contributed or incentives such as playoffs, Pro Bowl carrying over but I don't want to get into that. I hope this helps and that now after this you understand when you here something like, " The Steelers have tendered their Restricted Free Agent WR, Mike Wallace with a First and Third round tender."
42 comments
|
Add comment
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wouldn’t mind getting a first and third for Wallace…
"If you havin' dragon problems I feel bad for you son, I got 99 arrows but my knee took one."
I agree
I would rather we keep Wallace but if we can’t get a deal done that the Steelers could afford then the 1st and 3rd sounds fine.
anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Jan 13, 2012 11:55 AM EST up reply actions
it would depend on where in the first for me.
id prefer if we can keep him. i love the guy and i love what he brings to our offense. but a top 15 pick and a 3rd rounder? that would put us in range to take DeCastro or Luke Keuchly which would be HUGE for us. if we take DeCastro then Hightower at 24 we’d already have a successful draft and still have the other 7 picks to work with. if we’re losing Wallace tho we need to resign Cotchery and draft someone we like in the 2nd or 3rd.
by steel.curtain.number2 on Jan 13, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions
The idea of getting DeCastro AND Hightower/Keuchly/Burfict gives me a bon…nvm
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Jan 13, 2012 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
Its not a 1st and third in this years draft
It would be in 2013’s draft.
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert
That's a bummer
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Jan 13, 2012 1:59 PM EST up reply actions
That's surprising
So if we put a 1st and 3rd tender on Wallace, and some team signs him, and gets his services this year, we get no compensation at all until a full season has passed?
"They timed it perfectly, they just went too soon." - Darrell Waltrip commenting on an illegal restart.
bon bon
It is french for candy.
anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Jan 14, 2012 1:43 AM EST up reply actions
yeah, that would be great
but as stated below, do believe this would apply to next years draft. I also think the reliability of Wallace also helps us. He has been mostly injury free for us, and does not have character issues, this also helps in case of trade, etc. This killed us with Holmes. No doubt, the Steelers should of got more than a 5th for him. The character issues killed us on that one.
i would trade any player on the roster for a first and a third, sans BB
by average joe blow on Jan 13, 2012 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
I wouldn't trade
Timmons, Troy, AB, Ben, and Pouncey (probably throw in Heyward, too soon to tell)
Woodley and Harrison I’d only let go if the 1st was middle round or higher.
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Jan 13, 2012 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
Keep them too
Don’t want James killing Ben
"I think every quarterback should believe they’re the best. Do I think there are better quarterbacks than me? Possibly. But would I take anyone else with the ball in their hands at the end of the game? I don’t think so." - Ben Roethlisberger-
Harrison and Troy are on the wrong side of 30, so I wouldn’t blink an eye at trading them for a 1 & 3. Pouncey and Heyward were very recent first round picks so why not flip them for what you have invested plus another pick (and Pouncey’s gimpy ankle makes this a no-brainer for me). Don’t even know how Antonio Brown’s name sneaked onto this list…
by average joe blow on Jan 16, 2012 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
Some times your opinions are so odd it baffles me. Who cares if Troy is on the wrong side of 30 when he is still playing like the best SS in football? With a first and a third you aren’t going to get a player of his value unless that pick is in the top 5-10.
Pouncey and Heyward is baffling too. You’ve got two guys who you know can be and one a pro-bowler. An NFL draft pick is never a sure thing. Replacing young certainty with potential doubt is foolish. That’s why you don’t see trades like that ever. I would agree those trades are no-brainers.
I don’t know how you are confused by Antonio Brown.
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Jan 16, 2012 2:10 PM EST up reply actions
You’ve got two guys who you know can be starters
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Jan 16, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions
First to explain my reasoning just a bit, if you trade someone and receive a first and a third for them, I’m assuming that you already have a first and a third. Armed with two firsts and two thirds, you can go get anyone in the draft you want. You want to go get Kahil as your future LT – DONE. You want to go get Morris Claiborne as the best corner in this town since Rod Woodson – DONE. You want to go get DeCastro – DONE. Or you sit tight with two first round picks and pick up guys like Pouncey and/or Heyward (18th and 31st picks overall respectively).
Troy – Sure he is great right now, but how much longer will he maintain this level of play (he’ll turn 31 before the draft)? I’d bet we see significant decline in the next three seasons. He’s prone to injury and aging, two factors that don’t mix well together.
Pouncey – If and this is a huge if in my book, he didn’t have injury issues I might not include him on this list but the fact remains that right now his ability to stay healthy is a red flag. That combined with the position he plays is another no brainer for me.
Heyward – I don’t see why anyone wouldn’t flip him for a 1 and a 3. He was the 31st overall pick less than a year ago and while I thought he played suprisingly well, it’s not like he set the world on fire. He was a good rookie on a very limited number of snaps. Maybe he’s Aaron Smith 2.0 or maybe he’s Ziggy Hood. If I can sucker some other team into making that gamble, I’m doing it. I can find a really good 3-4 DE outside of the first round, or maybe I just use one of the two first round picks that I have at my disposal now, either way I’m pulling the trigger.
Brown – I love what he’s developed into but is he totally irreplaceable? Of course not and if you’re scared about replacing his production, you’ve got the ammo to move up and get the best WR on the board.
I think it’s pretty clear that you value a player who’s proven himself on the field at this level, even if it’s in very limited doses, to the unknown of the draft. I can’t fault you for that, but I’m totally the opposite. Draft picks are the currency of the NFL and with enough quality picks, just about anything is possible.
by average joe blow on Jan 16, 2012 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
I would much rather have a known than an unknown
Drafting isn’t as much of a science as people think and Madden has done that. There are a multiude of reasons guys succeed and other guys fail. I want as manby knowns on my team as possible.
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Lloyd, Andy Russell, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene, Curtis Martin, Willie Roaf, Andre Reed and Jerry Kramer
"Clemson should've stopped turning the ball over" Dana Holgorsen when asked about running up the score in the Orange Bowl
by WVPiratesfan on Jan 16, 2012 3:05 PM EST up reply actions
You want to go get Kahil as your future LT – DONE.
Actually, that’s not necessarily true. Kalil is likely a top 3 pick. Right now we have the 24th pick (740), which is worth less than a third of the 5th pick (2200). The 1st we’d have to get would have to be in the top 10 (10th is worth 1300) and then we’d still have to tack on another pick most likely. The other two are more likely, but still expensive when you consider you are losing a starter to draft a starter in another position.
Or you sit tight with two first round picks and pick up guys like Pouncey and/or Heyward (18th and 31st picks overall respectively).
Or, you end up picking a guy who ends up underperforming. Draft picks in the first are not certainties.
Troy – I would say he has 3 more years of solid play and probably 2 as still the best SS. Who knows? I’d say that is more of a certainty than finding a pick in this draft to replace him with no noticeable change.
Pouncey – Center is a lot more important than you think. And I’m not worried about his ankle yet.
Heyward – I can name 32 teams that wouldn’t trade away their number 1 pick from a year ago before they can see what their value is. It doesn’t make sense to trade away what you have for uncertainty. Like I said, that’s why you never see that type of trade.
Brown – See Limas Sweed.
Draft picks are one currency in the NFL, but they are not t he end all be all. Proven talent is ten-fold more valuable.
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Jan 16, 2012 3:12 PM EST up reply actions
The 1st we’d have to get would have to be in the top 10 (10th is worth 1300) and then we’d still have to tack on another pick most likely.
And that’s why we have an additional third round pick to add to the trade pile. I basically look at it like, would I trade Pouncey and our first round pick for Kahil? Absolutely.
I doubt your logic on the idea of trading away your #1 pick for a first and a third 12 months later. I think we don’t see that because if other teams valued that guy so much, they would have just drafted him the year before.
Brown – see Ward, ARE, Wallace, Sanders
Again, I think we just see the value of things differently and I’m sure we could back and forth all day long.
by average joe blow on Jan 16, 2012 4:14 PM EST up reply actions
3rd round picks are worth pretty much nothing. 265-120 points. My guess is Kalil goes 3rd, so we’d ideally have to trade up to 2nd to get him. That pick is worth 2,600. We’d have to give up our 24th (740), our 10th (hypothetical, it is worth 1300), our 2nd, and both our 3rds.
I basically look at it like, would I trade Pouncey and our first round pick for Kahil?
So, instead of having 2 starters you have one? That’s insanely dumb. No matter how good Kalil is, he isn’t worth two starters.
I think we don’t see that because if other teams valued that guy so much, they would have just drafted him the year before.
What? If a guy isn’t declared for the draft you can’t draft him. You don’t see that trade because NFL owners/coaches aren’t fickle and irrational.
Brown – Ward is now a sub 400 WR, Sanders can’t stay healthy, and Wallace can’t run intermediate routes. Brown is pretty valuable and my point that you overlooked is you don’t just “replace” people with ease. Limas Sweed is a perfect example of a draft pick not being worth dirt.
It’s not really what I do or don’t value. Would I love to have tons of picks and get shots at guys we otherwise wouldn’t have a shot at? Hell yeah! But I also realize we can win now and trading away that chance for “maybe win later” is irresponsible and that’s why you don’t see it from good franchises.
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
by John Stephens on Jan 16, 2012 5:15 PM EST up reply actions
Great post
If we tag Wallace, we are insane. We might not end up using it at all.
I say put a 1st and 3rd tender on him and try to get a reasonable deal with him.
"It’s easy to lie with statistics, but it’s easier to lie without them." -Fred Mosteller
Follow me on Twitter
yea no reason to tag him
No one would give up a first and a third for Wallace. In fact is there a reciever in the league that you’d give up a first and a third for? It would come down to MegaTron or Larry Fitz for me (AJohnson is just too injury prone for that kind of trade) but still that’s a lot to give up for any reciever.
I wonder if any team would even snag him away if we just tendered him with the first round tender. That would make it interesting.
by average joe blow on Jan 13, 2012 2:16 PM EST up reply actions
excellent
Great info, thanks. Never could get this straight
"We didn't worry about the calls," Harrison said. "When you're getting a lot of penalties against you, it brings you together."
by kick him in the head on Jan 13, 2012 9:28 AM EST via mobile reply actions
i think you forgot about Aaron Smith
he’s an unrestricted free agent as well. though we all know he’s probably retiring.
by steel.curtain.number2 on Jan 13, 2012 11:53 AM EST reply actions
No Aaron has 1 more yr when we restructured his deal
He counts 2.9m against the cap in 2012
No he isn't
It got this list straight form Steelers.com article a look at the Steelers Free Agents. As stated above Smith has 1 more year.
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert
are you sure?
this is the latest thing i can find on smith’s contract and to my knowledge hasnt restructured his deal since then.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07059/765522-66.stm
by steel.curtain.number2 on Jan 13, 2012 1:40 PM EST up reply actions
I see the confusion
Found multiple sites with conflicting information some saying he is a UFA and some saying he restructured his contract to extend here is one of those
My guess is that since Steelers.com didn’t include him he may have restructured his deal.
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert
yeah every site has different info
But, he is restructured and does have a yr left at 2.9M in cap. No way he’s back.
It doesn't matter
If he’s a UFA then he’s gone and he’s got one more year, he’s going to get cut anyways. Either way, thanks for your service Mr Smith.
by average joe blow on Jan 13, 2012 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
Another option
He retires and the Steelers work out a deal that pays him but drastically less to reduce cap hit.
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert
True, anything is possible and that wouldn't be a terrible outcome
You just have to wonder how much he’s got left in the tank after the recent rash of major injuries. Plus at some point you’ve got to move on. They didn’t spend first round picks on Hood and Heyward to desperately hang on to the waning years of Aaron Smith.
by average joe blow on Jan 13, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions
found a great article about all this today
and it explains that Smith restructured his contract this year so we could sign Max Starks after the Houston game.
by steel.curtain.number2 on Jan 13, 2012 5:18 PM EST up reply actions
A LOT of interesting decisions to be made about our restricted free agents
I think its clear we’re going to give Wallace the maximum tender (1st and 3rd), if not resign him altogether. however, we need to decide about Lewis, Foster, Mundy, and Legursky as well. I say a 1st for Lewis, 2nds for Foster and Mundy, and a 3rd for Legs.
by steel.curtain.number2 on Jan 13, 2012 12:13 PM EST reply actions
Can't tender Legs with a third
It is only 1st and 3rd,1st, Second, or Original Round, not sure how it works for Legs and Foster when they weren’t drafted going to have to look that up.
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert
Found it
The Original Draft Compensation can only go up to the second round, any higher and you would have to use Second, First or First and Third.
Original Draft Compensation is useless on undrafted players as the original team will receive no compensation.
Thus if the Steelers tried to used Original Draft compensation on Legs or Foster they would get any compensation if they signed else where.
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert
Forgot Max Starks and Trai Essex, they are UFA’s and Clay (RB) is an EFA.
by Steeler Nation VA on Jan 13, 2012 1:20 PM EST reply actions
You right I had trouble formatting the list and must have deleted them
fixing it
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert
I don't see Clay on the EFA list on Steelers.com
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert
From what I see
When Clay signed in December he signed a two year contract at the veteran minimum.
Huge fan of the Steelers. (that includes "Steelers West")
"If I could start my life over again, I would be a professional football player and you better damn well believe a Pittsburgh Steeler!"- Jack Lambert

by 































