Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

One Horrible Game, One Horrible Drive, One Horrible Plan and One Horrible Play

During the previous off-season I begged the Steelers to improve the cornerback situation (The Importance of Shopping at the Corner Market). I did not think they could win a championship, in this era of prolific passing, by winning 10-to-12 regular-season games and then getting torched in the playoffs by one of the fantasy quarterbacks who have become their daddy - guys named Brees, Brady, Manning and Rodgers.

The Steelers didn't exactly overwhelm me with cornerback hopes in the 2011 Draft. The first two rounds were allocated elsewhere. They did, however, use the third and fourth rounds to pick Curtis Brown and Cortez Allen. While Brown was used exclusively on special teams, and quite productive I might add, Allen had his moments as a defensive back, but still too young for major impact.

Pittsburgh led the league in pass defense this past season, but Brown and Allen weren't legitimate reasons. The number one reason was the obvious shift in philosophy by defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau. The soft-cushion, sure-tackling coverage that is good enough to lead to an impressive regular-season record, is not good enough to beat the fantasy quarterbacks in January and February. LeBeau's philosophical shift to a tighter, riskier coverage scheme was a wise decision for the most part.

The second reason for the Steelers passing defense crown was the acquisition of secondary coach Carnell Lake. Lake had the unique background of being a Pro Bowl player at both corner and safety. Lake brought that blend to the table and it showed on the field. The Steelers secondary often looked like interchangeable parts, and that was a good thing. Many times it looked like there were five or six Carnell Lakes on the field, not knowing which were cornerbacks and which were safeties. Opposing quarterbacks also took notice and in fact, had trouble with their counter-moves.

The third reason for Pittsburgh's improved secondary was the accelerated play of the incumbent personnel. Ike Taylor had the best year of his under-rated career. Many argued that he was the team's MVP. Willie Gay, the traditional whipping post of the secondary, made many more significant plays that brought smiles to Steeler Nation, with far fewer bad plays. Keenan Lewis finally looked like he could be a player. Troy Polamalu and Ryan Clark never looked better. When three or four people improve in a five-person unit, the improvement of the whole is dramatic. It could also be concluded that reason number three (accelerated play of incumbent personnel) might have been the byproduct of reason number one (philosophical shift in coverage schemes) and reason number two (Carnell Lake's contribution to the soup). In any case, the total synergism of all three reasons produced a massive upgrade to Pittsburgh's defense. This upgrade should spark optimism in the Nation for better days ahead. The NFL's offensive video-game performances are not going to go away soon. Instead of being kryptonite, the Steelers defensive backfield might continue to grow into the antidote.

Why then, with such improvement and optimism, did the Steelers not win their division and not win two playoff games like they did a year ago? The reason, and I hate to use Bill Cowher's favorite cliché, but it is resoundingly true, is that there is such a fine line in the NFL between Super Bowl Champions and teams that do not win playoff games. In the case of the 2011 Pittsburgh Steelers, that fine line came down to one horrible game, one horrible drive, one horrible plan and one horrible play.

Star-divide

The horrible game, of course, came in the opener against Baltimore. There is no point in analyzing that game to glean anything positive. Every player and every coach was horrible. That happens in the NFL, but when it happened to the Steelers against the Ravens, it became the harbinger for a season-long chase in which the rabbit never did get the carrot. Pittsburgh fans were teased when the Chargers beat Baltimore on a Sunday night to open the door, but with half of Ben Roethlisberger traveling to an outstanding San Francisco team, that door was shut the following night.

The horrible drive, of course, also happened against the Ravens, this time in the re-match. Pittsburgh had 92 yards to defend in order to reverse the opening debacle. The Steelers gave up only 2,751 passing yards all season, more than 200 fewer than the second-best passing defense and more than 2,000 fewer than the defending Super Bowl Champion Green Bay Packer defense. But in the NFL, like life, timing is everything. The timing of those 92 yards against Baltimore changed the outcome of the season. I mumbled to Mary Rose that we were going to regret that drive for a long, long time. Being good overall can be deceiving when you're not good when you really need to be. In ironic retrospect, the strongest part of the Steelers' defense was the weakest part at the very moment when it was needed most.

The one horrible game and one horrible drive was the difference between being the number one seed in the AFC, with home field advantage and a valuable week's rest for a banged-up veteran team, and a five-seed limping into a mile of altitude without the league's most underrated safety. Not a good time (there's that "timing" thing again) to concoct your worst defensive game plan. The Steelers put two field goals on the board before Denver gained a first down. On their third possession, the Broncos were faced with a third-and-12. In an absolute critical moment of the game, a moment when Denver was on the verge of knowing that its previous three games produced the real Broncos, Tim Tebow hit the first of his long passes that gave his team life, brought the crowd back into the game and with another 30-yard pass later, gave Denver the lead. They would never trail again.

The Broncos scored all three of their touchdowns by completing four passes for 200 yards. The game plan called for the same tight man coverage that conquered Tom Brady earlier in the season. In fairness to the defense, Pittsburgh's offense played brilliantly against New England and basically kept Brady off the field. Still, Tim Tebow is the anti-Brady. He is incapable of dinking and dunking you down the field with long drives. The Steeler defense of 2010 and prior, playing soft and requiring numerous precision passes to score a touchdown, would have beaten Tebow. Remember, that defense almost always beats poor-to-mediocre quarterbacks, of which Tebow is clearly a member. Tebow was accurate 10 times the entire game. He would have needed to be accurate 10 times in just one drive to score just one touchdown. Moreover, it is likely that somewhere along the way an errant or deflected pass would have landed in the arms of a Steeler defender who was playing behind the receivers.

The gamble to play the same defensive scheme against Denver as New England was one which cost the Steelers to at least live another day. On that other day, Bill Belichick did not repeat Pittsburgh's mistake and with a far inferior defense, made Tebow-mania a passing (or should I say non-passing) fad. The Patriots didn't need Brady's six touchdowns passes. Two were enough. I often say that hindsight makes geniuses of the cowards who use it, and far be it from me to critique the great Dick LeBeau, but New England's defense of guys milling all over the field was far more effective against Denver than Pittsburgh's plan to put everyone on the line of scrimmage like the starting line at the Boston Marathon. Once again, the strongest part of the Steelers' defense was the weakest part at the very moment when it was needed most. That timing thing again.


Which finally leads to the "one horrible play." With all 11 defenders stretched across the line, Denver needed just one play to end Pittsburgh's season in overtime. It was the second time in a decade that Pittsburgh lost a road playoff game in overtime without touching the ball. Despite adding another chapter to the many stories of heartbreaking playoff losses in Steelers' history, optimism will still be aplenty going into the 2012 season. It is built in to the psyche of Steeler Nation. But when looking back at the story of 2011, we will always be reminded of that ultra-fine line in the National Football League. 2011 will forever be titled, "one horrible game, one horrible drive, one horrible plan and one horrible play."

Comment 63 comments  |  Add comment  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Why oh why

do you make me re-live my agony with such eloquence?

We are so used to the team rising to the occasion and the weakness becomes a strength in the time of need. Alas, your analysis prove to be, once again, unmatched.

I love the Steelers.

by tannofsteel84 on Jan 17, 2012 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

Well....

I think you dont give enough credit to the three DB’s we were missing in the playoffs, but mostly, Dont touch the true cause of the problems
1) we cant cover 4-5 receiver sets buy counting on our line backers in coverage
2) our 3-4 scheme does not put enough pressure of the QB
The difference between winning and losing a match up is .5 – 1.5 seconds…. against 4-5 receiver sets its .5 sec….( say NO – GB …I leave NE out this group due to lack of receiver depth) Against stout OF lines its 1.5 sec, and the Ravens proved their mediocore QB given that extra 1.5 sec can beat us with an occasional splash play and check downs to Rice… Hate to break the news but, our 4 LARGE linebacker 3-4 set is quickly becoming obsolete in todays NFL, and you can bet those teams mentioned and others will be exposing those weeknesses next year extensively…. perhaps they will intagrate our new DB’s and vary game plan accordingly….Its a necessity for success.

by OR69faithfull on Jan 17, 2012 11:01 AM EST reply actions  

About your second point

I wonder if Pittsburgh should consider adopting a more 4-3 oriented defense? The biggest problem i see with that approach is the Steelers linebacking corps is definitely a 3-4 linebacking corps. But I could see Woodley being used as one of the defensive ends in a 4-3, but I’m still not sure how that would work. Having Woodley and Harrison both healthy and on the field next year might solve the problem of not enough pressure like what happened this year.

by blitzzburgh on Jan 18, 2012 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Troy

I love Troy, but I don’t think he had a good season by his standards. He was just short on many plays that he used to make (lost a step?), and he was caught guessing in coverage way too often (too much film on him?).

If we stick with our 3-4 scheme, I’d like to see Troy take the position of linebacker that can cover guys out of the backfield, and put a different coverage guy behind him. I’m not a football gur, but what about Troy and Timmons as ILB and Woodley and Harrision as OLB.

by ballparkfranks on Jan 17, 2012 11:13 AM EST reply actions  

done several times during the season. Mundy at SS and Troy as ILB… check out game against Pats

"Steel lightens your work, brightens your leisure, and widens your world."

"I've gotta a feelin!
Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl!"

by dmdjr1 on Jan 17, 2012 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

on the denver debacle

Yes the game plan and execution was terrible, but in truth I think the coaches played the hand that was dealt them. Yes the Pats have an inferior defense, but what they did have was depth. The fact that we were down to 3 available bodies on the D-line dictated that we had to gamble to stop the run. Those guys were gassed, and not cheating to stop the run would have only yielded another article on how we were inept at stopping Denver’s rushing attack.

by lkwdsteel on Jan 17, 2012 11:55 AM EST reply actions  

agree 100%...and I still say the lockout did us in....

for whatever reason our guys didn’t stay physically conditioned during the lockout and we were therefore subjected to injuries early in the season from which we were really never able to fully recover from and as a result the injuries caught up to us and eventually killed our SB chances……

I can resist everything but temptation.....

by the duchess of steel on Jan 17, 2012 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

A well written distillation...

…of a painful end to a season that showed that good teams are most often defeated by themselves, not superior oponents.

United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.

by PaVaSteeler on Jan 17, 2012 11:59 AM EST reply actions  

Our loss in Denver had more to do with an very ineffective offense to put up more than enough points to put Tebow in a panic… that’s why we lost primarily. Secondarily, had we put up enough point the run game for Denver would of not been an issue and then we could of feasted on the Passing Game. We just had too many injuries to overcome playing on the road and a decent defense that could get to the QB. Our issues aren’t bad except depth and conditioning… Had we had a fully healthy line and QB we are playing in NE and maybe Balt… Tack on our coaching choices to adapt our offense to work within our injuries. We should of gone heavy (multiple TE) and lessen the number WR and bring in a FB to help protect. We didnt and thats why we lost…

by rummy67 on Jan 17, 2012 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

not to disagree but our offense....

Put up 23 points. That should have been enough to win. Every time we lost this year the opponent score 20+ points. I knew we were in trouble when it was 20-6 at the half. Now the D. Got stout after the half. They only allowed a figgie. However that first half doomed us. I do not think this loss can be blamed solely on the offense. Denver had a pretty good game plan the first half. The offense adjusted and score 17 points int the second. Therefore I think even with the injuries, both sets of coaching staffs did well.

That first crappy play in overtime killed us… One bad play.

by Steely McBeem on Jan 17, 2012 5:22 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Agree

with you 100%.

The Pittsburgh defense gave up an average of 14 points per game this year. 23 should have been more than enough…especially coming out even in the turnover department and playing against one of the most inept passing quarterbacks the game has ever witnessed.

by pistil_stamen on Jan 18, 2012 2:38 AM EST up reply actions  

agree and disagree

You’re right 23 points should have been enough. However, after seeing how efficient our offence could be playing a quick short passing game (ie against New England) I am still disappointed with our offence. Hopefully we can shift our style of play to actually take advantage of our stable of talented receivers next year and focus less on the big play which, although sometimes spectacular gets Ben hurt.

"Kompromise, my friend, is the essence of diplomacy, and diplomacy is the kornerstone of love... sweeeeeet looooOOOve"

by CheekyMonkey on Jan 18, 2012 5:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Just wasn't meant to be

Prior to Ben’s injury we looked like the most well rounded team in the AFC. But his injury, along with all the other injuries, was just too much to overcome.

Personally, I’m glad Denver put us out of our misery. Not only would NE have crushed us, but I don’t think i could have watched Ben limp around anymore, almost defenseless…he could have done some permanent damage.

Nope. Wasn’t meant to be. I’ve already moved on to the draft.

by SteelerMike on Jan 17, 2012 2:17 PM EST reply actions  

Pats outcome could not have worse

I have to disagree, and say that nothing could be worse than the way the Denver game ended.
I would take my chances in NE, and could accept defeat, knowing we were so crippled on defense. I mean, how shocking would it be to lose to the Brady bunch on the road?
And speaking of deenver, don’t be surprised if the NFL schedules the opening weekend of
PIT-DEN….maybe a Monday night, but my guess is that’s what will happen.
So only 8 months until our first revenge game

by Oregon Mike on Jan 17, 2012 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Man losing in OT, after rallying from 16 down, with HALF your starters on the field...

Is a noble death. It was just too much.

Brady would have been angry at us, and NE would have put down an otherwordly beatdown on us. They stopped at 6 TDs with Denver. I don’t think they would have EVER stopped scoring if they played us.

Bungles Tank Stupidly like Clockwork
----------
Had we won I probably would have started working out some time in March. I started yesterday.
-Ryan Clark

by svenhoek on Jan 17, 2012 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Really not too upset...

Wasn’t confident going into the playoffs and basically knew we weren’t going far. Too many injuries. Of course, I always want them to win but this just NEVER seemed like our year. Not enough quality wins over the course of the season to inspire confidence. The offensive line simply isn’t getting better and that needs to be addressed and I’d like to see another quality cover man on defense. I’m excited for new faces to start next year. I think 2012 holds a lot of legitimate promise…IF Pouncey can both get and STAY healthy. Love the Steelers and am happy they are getting some rest right now.

by Steel Driver on Jan 17, 2012 3:00 PM EST reply actions  

D- one bad game, O- bad season

The D had a big hand in losing but with the injuries to corners, our D-line and Clark, I think LeBeau did the best he could with what he had to work with, he assumed they would need to shut Denver down completely to win. NE’s offense won the game for them, not their defense, it’s much easier to play D against Denver when you score TD’s, not FG’s. If we go up 14-0 instead of 6-0, it is a totally different game. Our D has to hold every team to fewer pts because we can never outscore anyone, can never put anyone away and just don’t score enough pts. The D was a problem against Denver but it was because of our offensive ineptitude this and years past that made LeBeau think they needed the D to win the game by shutting them down. Any offense with competent players should be able to score with the rules and we don’t score enough and we don’t control the ball enough, and for the most part just underperform all around on offense and it will be the same next year so I hope the D is up to the task again or it will be a long season.

by SteelCity G on Jan 17, 2012 3:15 PM EST reply actions  

You forgot one horrible official's call...

When Ray Lewis took out Hines ward with a helmet to helmet hit on 3rd down in the second meeting. The only time I have ever seen an official frantically wave for the trainers. How could he have seen the horrible collision and not have seen the helmet to helmet? So instead of a first down inside the 10, we had to settle for a short field goal.

I hate to be “that guy” who complains about the officiating, but just like Maryrose said, it’s not how many calls go against your team, it’s the placement and effect of those calls. 10,000,000 views groan at an obvious personal file but the 8 part time officials who could do something about it do nothing.

So not penalty but a $15,000 fine for Ray Lewis and a victory for the Ravens. I bet they liked that deal. Who knows what they would have done if it was James Harrison.

by edw519 on Jan 17, 2012 4:16 PM EST reply actions  

Stop Whining About Officials!

You are embarrassing yourself amongst Steeler fans around the world. Fair weather fans, Seahawk fans and fantasy football idiots whine about penalties or officials. Steeler fans don’t even bring it up, it’s a part of the game. Be a man, take it and move on!

by masterchiefnavy on Jan 17, 2012 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Who the Fuck

Do you think you are?

Masterchiefnavy. You might want to watch your tone. You are embarassing the Navy.

by biggcat on Jan 17, 2012 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

and you have embarrassed kittens with your use of profanity

"Steel lightens your work, brightens your leisure, and widens your world."

"I've gotta a feelin!
Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl!"

by dmdjr1 on Jan 17, 2012 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

No need for that at all biggcat

Formerly known as Steeler_

BTSC's token Kiwi fan. That means I'm a New Zealander. Yes, that small country next to Australia....no we are not part of Australia

by Michael Hewitt on Jan 17, 2012 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Grow up

He wasnt even talking to you. Profanity (especially in a confrontational way to others) is not allowed on this board (exc gameday threads when emotions run high). Dont like it, then choose a different blog to share your “thoughts” with

Formerly known as Steeler_

BTSC's token Kiwi fan. That means I'm a New Zealander. Yes, that small country next to Australia....no we are not part of Australia

by Michael Hewitt on Jan 17, 2012 9:29 PM EST up reply actions  

You were talking to all of us...

…when you posted that. I don’t want to hear it either.

United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.

by PaVaSteeler on Jan 18, 2012 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Never

Talked to you. Mind you business.

by biggcat on Jan 18, 2012 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

You post on here...

…it becomes my, and every one else’s business. You don’t like it , leave.

United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.

by PaVaSteeler on Jan 18, 2012 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah yes, but you posted it where everyone can see

Dont make this harder than this has to be. Just drop the profanity. Thanks

Formerly known as Steeler_

BTSC's token Kiwi fan. That means I'm a New Zealander. Yes, that small country next to Australia....no we are not part of Australia

by Michael Hewitt on Jan 18, 2012 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Hard?

Feel like having the last word makes you tough?

I dropped the profanity several posts ago. I have only used 1 profane word. Please be more accurate when you are trying to throw your cyber weight around. If your only concern was the profanity, you would have shut up when I didn’t use any more. Freedom of speech, I fought for it and won’t have somebody like you censor me.

by biggcat on Jan 18, 2012 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

lol. “freedom of speech” Obviously you’re not really sure what that particular amendment grants. I see it a lot on here and other places. You should know what it means if you want to cite it.

Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?

by FrankWyt on Jan 18, 2012 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice of you to jump in.

Why don’t yoou enlighten me, wise ass

by biggcat on Jan 18, 2012 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Thank you, I appreciate your acknowledgment of my jumping in. I don’t think I need to enlighten anyone though, I’m not the one that is improperly citing it.

Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?

by FrankWyt on Jan 18, 2012 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

No, What You Need To Do Is.....

try to fight the urge to be an annoying twerp.

by biggcat on Jan 18, 2012 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

The Stupid

It burns.

Formerly known as Steeler_

BTSC's token Kiwi fan. That means I'm a New Zealander. Yes, that small country next to Australia....no we are not part of Australia

by Michael Hewitt on Jan 18, 2012 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Freedom of speech, I fought for it and won’t have somebody like you censor me

Typical response from someone who wants to be belligerent but gets called on it; this

Freedom of speech you purportedly cite protects also those of us who wish to voice our objections to your inappropriate language and your unnecessary hostility in trying to control what we’re allowed to say in voicing said objections. If your claim of

I fought for it
is true, then you had to adhere to a code of conduct in the military; why can’t you accept a similar one here like the rest of us? Or do you deem to hold yourself above us?

United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.

by PaVaSteeler on Jan 18, 2012 9:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Well it actually only applies to the Government

seeing as the is not the Government it does not apply

Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Lloyd, Andy Russell, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene, Curtis Martin, Willie Roaf, Andre Reed and Jerry Kramer
"Clemson should've stopped turning the ball over" Dana Holgorsen when asked about running up the score in the Orange Bowl

by WVPiratesfan on Jan 19, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't have a tone.

I stand by my statement that only losers whine about officials and injuries. Every team deals with them to whatever degree fate decides to dish them out. “Suck it up and play the game you are paid to play” is the motto. Ike Taylor did it and admitted his poor performance instead of talking about having Mundy back there vice Clark.
My point is be a grownup and quit making excuses. When he first arrived Coach Tomlin posted a phrase on the locker room wall that says it all; “Ask for nothing, Blame no one, Do something”. In other words, don’t dwell on it or whine about it, if you don’t like the situation do something about it. You should do the same.

by masterchiefnavy on Jan 18, 2012 5:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Refs

I’m not complaining about the refs in terms of whether it cost us a game or the season, but c’mon man! They were bad ALL season, not just against the Steelers either. IF the refs are going to call h2h, and other b.s. then they need to be consistent. Brady gets pushed, it’s roughing the passer. Ben gets body slammed into the turf…nothing. The Harrison on McCoy hit was “questionable” due to the fact that McCoy WAS a runner….until he released the ball. Lewis destroys Ward in front of the ref, no call. I mean, I have no problem with the Harrison penalty, but call EVERY h2h call if you are going to call it. How about the Giants/Packers game last week? If Green Bay would have made a few plays, those 2 questionable calls (obvious G.B. fumble and phantom roughing the passer call) might have handed them the game. There is no consistency, and in fact, I almost question the legitimacy of the refs. I must not be the only one, because Goodell recently announced he’s considering to have 10 full-time refs. I just hope they aren’t his cronies, who will decide games upon Roger’s will.

by twault on Jan 18, 2012 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

True

In the 49’ers vs. Saints game I saw a couple hits that looked EXACTLY like Harrison’s hit on McCoy that weren’t called. The level of subjectivity associated with a penalty that merits 15 ydards and possible suspension is just ridiculous.

by Steelgator on Jan 21, 2012 3:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Excuse vs. Fact

An excuse is when you say, “I don’t have to get better because it wasn’t my fault,” and I don’t hear anyone saying that.

A fact is when you say, the Steelers really were better than the Ravens in their second loss this season because the refs called two h2h hits on the Steelers and threw the flag on neither of two fairly obvious h2h hits by the Ravens (McClain’s hit on Brown was pretty egregious also). In addition, Torrey Smith clearly pushed off in order to gain separation on his game winning catch.

Bringing up officials and injuries is not always for the purpose of self-pity. It is necessary data for an accurate evaluation of a team’s true quality. For example, suppose next season we find ourselves playing a team that had a 2-4 record, but three of those losses were due to blown calls at the end of games. I assume you would agree that it makes sense to say “don’t underestimate this team because of their losing record; they should be 5-1.” I think Eds519 and others are just applying this same method of evaluation to the Steelers.

by Steelgator on Jan 21, 2012 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice analysis as always

Two factors that I think have not been emphasized enough.

1. With one experienced running back playing in high altitude, a very effective running game could not be utilized to the max..

2. Clark. Not only what he brings by himself, but what his presence allows Troy in terms of latitude and flexibility.

by Ivan Cole (RickVa) on Jan 17, 2012 4:19 PM EST reply actions  

To Say

Polamalu never looked better is incorrect. I thought he looked injured or confused 50% of the time.

by biggcat on Jan 17, 2012 4:42 PM EST reply actions  

Confused while in coverage

"He had no teeth, and he was slobbering all over himself. I'm thinking, 'You can have your money back, just get me out of here. Let me go be an accountant." I can't tell you how badly I wanted out of there."
- Denver rookie QB John Elway, on Jack Lambert, after Lambert and the Steelers knocked Elway out of his first game as a pro (1983).

by Han on Jan 17, 2012 5:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

His coverage down the field was off all year. Playing within 10 yards of the LOS, he looked as good as ever.

by pistil_stamen on Jan 18, 2012 2:40 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

with you there. Pass coverage though wasn’t great.

by biggcat on Jan 18, 2012 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

One Horrible Hangover.

Playoff defeats bring out the binge-drinker in me. Sadly, playoff victories do the same.

by crosby87 on Jan 17, 2012 5:43 PM EST reply actions  

great piece

thank you. i still don’t get the strategy. as you say, the old defense almost always beats bad qbs.

by 57_Varieties on Jan 17, 2012 7:19 PM EST reply actions  

Mellow

I am less upset than a lot of folks around these parts. 12-4 was a good record. Unlike some, I don’t view the Denver game as a humiliation. A team with a good defense and a good running attack beat us. Yes, it’s remarkable that they beat us by passing, but there you go.

And they beat us when our ranks were decimated by injury. (OK, that’s the wrong word because far more than 10% of our team was out, but you get the point.) How many starters were Out or Walking Wounded by the end of that game? Our QB, our best RB, multiple backup RBs, both of our best tackles, our probowl center, all 3 of our starting D linemen, our safety, and both of our OLBs. Jokes were going round that we might not be able to field a full team.

So no shame there, in my book. And plenty to feel good about this year in terms of development of young players, including what may prove to be a stellar draft.

+

That said – that I feel this was a good year in my books – I do not feel that there was anything too random or unlikely about our exit this year.

We beat the teams that we should beat; but the Ravens, 49ers, and Texans were better than us this year, demonstrating that on the field. The Offensive Line continues to be bad, just as predicted at the beginning of the year – and we had our worst games against teams with good defensive linemen. We give up more sacks that take us out of field goal range than any team I’ve seen.

Still – even with holes on the line – the Steelers boasted tons of “playmakers” on office. More, frankly, than any team since 1979. The one scandal of this year is that all that talent combined to field the 22nd ranked offense in the game. A probowl QB, a RB said to be in the top 10 in the league, a TE considered the most complete in the game, 2 pro bowl wideouts, a third destined for the hall of fame, and two other wideouts that passed him on the depth chart. That’s a lot of firepower. Yet only ten teams in the league were worse.

And that performance wasn’t surprising. We followed a rigid offensive philosophy that underperforms by not playing to the team’s strengths. Was anyone really surprised to see the bubble screens against Denver? No? Might Denver have expected them too? What about the heavy reliance on the long bomb heaves to Wallace? Not surprised? Me neither. Neither was Denver.

The good play-calling this year (against New England, for example) was distinctive in how it departed from our normal practice; yet we rarely returned to it.

So, in the end, a brave, hard-hitting team with a great defense but heavy injuries played a weaker team with good defensive linemen, and our OC called another somnambulant game that failed to put points on the board. And we lost. Nothing too unexpected there.

+

On to next year. Make six moves and win another superbowl. (1) Draft a great lineman. (2) Sign another in free agency. (3) Draft a NT. (4) Sign an ILB. (5) Sign a kicker. (6) Get a new offensive coordinator. Simple, huh?

by Steelzombie on Jan 17, 2012 11:51 PM EST reply actions  

Yeah

That bubble screen on 3rd and 7 that forced us to kick a FG was just painful.

by Steelgator on Jan 21, 2012 3:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Gay is getting better, but...

Why does he always insist on lining up 10 yards off the LoS on 3rd and short. There is at least one drive in each of the 17 games this season where Gay single handedly kept the defense on the field.

When the offense only needs 3 yards, and you start 10 yards away in a back pedal there is a problem.

by Hozland on Jan 18, 2012 3:20 PM EST reply actions  

where a defender

Lines up is dictated by the defensively play call

People don't ever seem to realize that doing what's right is no guarantee against misfortune.
- William McFee

by stillergorillar on Jan 18, 2012 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

So now what?

Certainly the CB play needs to be improved and this year saw strides in that direction (thanks likely to Carnell Lake). But the biggest need in terms of the draft remains the O-Line. So what to do about the defense, particularly the corners? LeBeau made a much-needed adjustment in his approach to New England and I would have liked to have seen if that was a one-time remedy or we had finally overcome the Brady-hurdle. Bot that was not to be because the defense made Tebow look like a real QB and the Broncos out-gameplanned our defense. What drove me crazy was not Tebow’s first scoring drive, but that with each drive after that, LeBeau and the defense didn’t evolve. The defensive plan on the last play was unsuccessful on Denver’s earlier scoring drives, so why stick to the same plan in OT?

I know this sounds like basphemy to many. LeBeau is a HoF’er if the HoF means anything. He renewed and reinvigorated the great Steeler defense tradition and will always be beloved by Steeler Nation. But with all the new rules, the game has changed. If weak QBs like Flacco and Tebow can pass their way to game-winning drives against our defense, the defensive game plan needs to evolve to remain successful.

by Crashd726 on Jan 19, 2012 2:59 PM EST reply actions  

A couple of things...
If weak QBs like Flacco and Tebow can pass their way to game-winning drives against our defense

1) Denver game – I think our defense may have evolved as game went on and Tebow showed he could pass, if we had bodies left in which to make the changes; remember, we lost both Keisel and Hampton in FIRST quarter and had to make adjustments to stop the run we had been expecting, then, as the passing continued, couldn’t fully drop back, because would have weakened the run defense.

2) – 2nd Ravens game – the entire defense didn’t (fully) lose that game; it was “bending” as designed. Unfortunately, a mistake by Clark and Gay on the TD play is what killed us that game.

But I fully agree with you that defensive game plans must be adaptable within the game being played, as do offensive game plans, especially when injuries to Olinemen require substitutions that may then require changes from the plan, which we didn’t see much of this past year (changes to plan, that is).

United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.

by PaVaSteeler on Jan 19, 2012 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Review of 2011 Season

Much of what you say about the defense is good, the the Steelers problem is not with the defense! Maybe you intend to address this later. Taking a long view, rather than trying to isolate the season outcome on a single game or even a single play ask what was the most persisistent and consistent attribute of their season overall. The Steeler’s consistently underachieved on offense against inferior opponents. Personnel? I don’t think so. Schemes? Maybe. Coaching? Intimately connected with schemes, right? With the obvious wealth of talent they have there is hardly any conceivable excuse for their pathetic offensive performances except for coaching.

by enkayess on Jan 19, 2012 5:05 PM EST reply actions  

The worst curse that could ever befell an offensive coordinator is to have outstanding skill people and a disaster for an offensive line. Hindsight makes genuises from the fools who use it. Witness Wallace’s touchdown run in the playoff game. I saw not one, not a single one from everything written I devour, that criticized that run. Why? Because it scored. If Wallace gets tackled at the five-yard line, all five million members of Steelers Nation have a collective aneurism. That’s the way offensive play-calling goes.

The offensive line has been a total calamity for at least two years. Colon and Starks, then Scott and Adams, back to Starks, but Colon goes down again, and that’s just the tackles. We have a great center who happens to miss the two most important games of the last two years and is hobbled in other key games. And the guards? Really? Bill Walsh, Paul Brown and Sid Gilman could not call plays with this line. Watch Brady and Eli and Rodgers and Brees drop back to pass. You can count between three and four every time before they START getting nervous. Then go back and watch Steeler tapes. Ben is in trouble before the count of three ever happens. Cannot win a line that changes 10 starting units in 17 games, not to mention a complete overhaul from a year ago. Until that improves, we will fight like hell to get into the playoffs and then plug our ears.

Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history

by maryrose on Jan 19, 2012 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

I saw not one, not a single one from everything written I devour, that criticized that run

I was on the game thread that day, there were multiple people complaining about that play like crazy.

Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?

by FrankWyt on Jan 19, 2012 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Clark

Terrific read!! I only disagree with your comment about Clark never being better. He never made any plays on the ball the whole year and dropped a couple of interceptions that could have turned the game around. He’s terrific against the run but below average in pass coverage especially for a free safety. Hopefully, the Steelers can find his replacement in this year’s draft.

Proud fan of Pittsburgh's professional sports teams and the Pirates too.

by Black&GoldTrain on Jan 20, 2012 12:08 PM EST reply actions  


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Your all time Steeler regret?
5467103_small
Hines Ward: a different look part 1. Hines vs. the big boys.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Isaac Redman 2012: Should we temper our expectations?
Photo_small
Worry Warts
6-trophies_small
The Saint Will Be The Starter for 2012 - The Whole Season.
Trophies_small
Why Is Rashard Mendenhall Still On This Roster?
2009-week6_1440x900_benroethlisberger_small
Pads - To wear or not to wear
Small
53 Man Roster (Way too early edition)
Small
WHEN DO TICKETS GO ON SALE?
Small
Submitted for your approval: Steeler names for this year's pledge class
Small
The biggest offseason ever

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Hines_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo