I think people won't be happy.
I have received a lot of criticism for my previous post (link bellow)
where I stated that a lot of defensive changes need to be made for 2012. This was all posted before the Wild Card game in Denver and I must admit I felt like nobody would take it seriously. Now though it seems like someone else agrees with the basics of what I hypothesized some weeks ago. Ed Bouchette wrote an interesting article in which he states many defensive changes are coming. I have linked his article here also.
now does anyone care to wager an opinion now or is everyone still in denial that moves likes these need to be made? Or that even if they don't need to be made for on field reasons they need to be and will be made for money reasons?