2011 NFL Playoffs Facts and Figures
* Though it may seem like this year's field of NFL playoff teams is less than stellar, it's worth noting that 2011 marks just the second year ever that at least six teams enter the playoffs with 12 or more wins (New England, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Green Bay, San Francisco, New Orleans). The only other time as many 12+ win teams qualified for the postseason was in 2003.
* Perhaps being in the wild card round isn't such a bad thing for the Steelers. After all, winners in the opening round of the playoffs have gone on to win it all seven times. And in five of the past six seasons, at least one of the two teams participating in the SB has been forced to win three games beginning in the wild card round to punch their ticket to SB Sunday.
* With the Houston Texans and Detroit Lions both qualifying for the postseason this year, Buffalo now becomes the lone team in the NFL not to have made the playoffs since realignment in 2002. Yes, even Cleveland has been invited to the postseason party. Just once though back in the very first year of realignment ('02).
* Speaking of realignment, the Steelers have made seven playoff berths in the past 10 years since 2002. Those seven playoff appearances are tied with the Green Bay Packers for second most among playoff teams in 2011, trailing only New England who's been playoff bound eight times in the past ten seasons. Interestingly and impressively enough, the Patriots won the AFC East in each of those eight seasons. This will be the second time the Steelers have entered the postseason as a wild card rather than the AFC North champion. The last time, of course, was in 2005, and we all remember how they fared that year.
* And to round out the realignment related tidbits...for the first time since 2002, there were seven new divisional winners. Only the Patriots were repeat winners of their division.
* Exactly one half of this year's field has won a Super Bowl since 2000. They are? The Steelers ('05, '08), the Patriots ('01, '03, '04), the Ravens ('00), the Giants ('07), the Saints ('08), and the Packers ('10). With the Steelers and Pats winning multiple Lombardis, a total of nine of the past 11 Super Bowls have been won by teams in this year's playoff field.
* The Steelers qualified for their 27th playoffs, tied for third most with Green Bay, and trailing only the Cowboys (30) and the Giants (31) for most in league history.
* The Steelers may not have been able to gain any ground on the Packers in the previous category, but they can inch closer to the all-time winningest playoff record if they can fare better than the defending champion Packers. Entering this year's playoffs, the Steelers sport a 33-20 record (.623) compared to Green Bay's record of 29-16 (.644).
* There's only one team that can catch the Steelers in all-time SB wins this year. That team is the San Francisco 49ers, who, along with the Cowboys, have captured five SB titles. Green Bay, who seeks to become the ninth repeat champion in NFL history, has four SBs. Their remaining nine league titles came in the pre-SB era.
* I'm not sure this will make for a quality football game, but Saturday's matchup between the Houston Texans and Cincinnati will be the first time in NFL history that two rookie quarterbacks will face off. T.J. Yates aims to return to lead Houston to a victory at home against the Andy Dalton led Bengals in what will be the first playoff game in franchise history for the Texans.
40 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I could be wrong
but if the Steelers beat Denver, it would mark the 34th postseason victory and break a current tie at 33 with the Cowboys.
That total includes the seasons the NFL existed from 1920-1971, when Pittsburgh had 0 total playoff wins. So Green Bay, New York, Washington and Chicago all had a 39 year head start, but are all behind us now. (There were no playoff games until 1932, I believe.)
My favorite note...
The AFC has been represented by the Colts, patriots, and Stillers every year since 2002.
"I was a victim of a series of accidents. As are we all."
---Malachi Constant
by The Herndon Kid on Jan 5, 2012 8:53 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Really impressive that..
Colts obviously get an asterisk this year. But yeah the AFC isn’t some grabass game of football bingo where a ball with a team’s name comes out like the NFC is.
In the AFC, you know who’s gonna be in that Super Bowl most of the time. In the NFC it’s anybody’s guess.
I kinda feel like San Fran will continue the NFC trend of having a new champ every year.
The Niners would have to beat two high power offenses in GB and NO to make the playoffs unless there are some upsets, right? I don’t see it. They might be able to do it once in Candlestick against the Saints. But I don’t see them going to Lambeau and doing it again.
I feel good about them beating the Saints
But I see your point about going to Lambeau.
However, it’s incredibly hard to repeat as a SB champion- I admit to being biased, but I think it’s actually fairly likely that someone is going to totally upset the Packers NEXT week, and that the NFC championship game will be played in SF. I don’t know who the opponent will be, or who the winner of that game will be, but I wouldn’t be surprised if someone knocks Green Bay out early this year.
You know- kind of like used to happen to the Colts.
"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will
by lottwasgangsta on Jan 7, 2012 5:56 PM EST up reply actions
The Bills, arguably
the best team to appear in 4 SB’s without a title, though I place them behind Tarkingtons Viking squad..
The 1970 Vikings
were QB’ed by Joe Kapp as Tarkington had been traded to the Giants. He later returned and led them to 3 more losses.
Fully aware
Joe QBed the 69-70 vikes, as good as that buffalo team was, they didnt face Hank Strams Chiefs, Don Shula’s undefeated Dolphins, Chuck Knolls Steelers, and John Maddens Raiders…. what a stroke of fate….
by OR69faithfull on Jan 6, 2012 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
I think that franchised is curse
they had a couple chances in the late 90s where they were favored and still loss
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Jan 6, 2012 11:15 AM EST up reply actions
If you're going to be a true Steelers fan
You have to know, it’s NOLL. Normally I don’t like to be the hall monitor, but that, my friend, is Steelers 101. It actually physically hurt me to read you correctly spell every coach’s name in your comment BUT the Steelers’ coach.
"I respect everyone on the football field. But some people I don't like. And some people I dislike even more." - James Harrison
by steely mcballs on Jan 6, 2012 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
If I need
a hall monitor I’ll let you know…… likely was watching steeler games b4 u were born
by OR69faithfull on Jan 6, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions
Watching ≠ Comprehensions
Old, “Watching since before you were born” ≠ Credibility
by Wizard of Woz on Jan 6, 2012 4:43 PM EST up reply actions
I would think likely not on both counts
I lived in Pittsburgh during the four SBs in the 70s. Although as the Wizard notes, that doesn’t equal credibility. Noll was a great coach and deserves recognition and proper spelling of his name, that’s all.
This coming from someone who hates it when people refer to “the Tony Dungy coaching tree” (and in fact Noll is considered part of the Sid Gillman tree).
"I respect everyone on the football field. But some people I don't like. And some people I dislike even more." - James Harrison
by steely mcballs on Jan 6, 2012 4:57 PM EST up reply actions
Lets See
simple post about a couple 4 time suberbowl teams thar both came up empty = spelling lesson?.. not even spelling lesson…. rather a atempt to school me?.. . = pecker head punk….
So take you 101 classless self to another posters comments… best get to know me a bit before suggesting you know anything about me …care to carry this further..? punk?
by OR69faithfull on Jan 6, 2012 9:06 PM EST up reply actions
sounds like you need a fainting couch
I wouldn’t personally devolve into name-calling or whatever attitude problem it is that you have. Also, I’m not the one who tried to puff up his chest and get all “b4 u were born” up in here.
I’m also not the first one in this particular thread to correct you on a fact, and I don’t think my ensuing response was anything more than a further explanation of how my respect for Coach Noll motivated my initial comment. Hell, I might have even felt like a mea culpa might have been in order, but your last comment certainly did allow me to get to know you a bit. Thanks for making it clear what kind of person you really are.
If you do ever notice my comments here, you will find that most of them are in jest, or are at least meant to be light-hearted. So go back and read my original comment with that in mind, and get your knickers out of a twist.
"I respect everyone on the football field. But some people I don't like. And some people I dislike even more." - James Harrison
by steely mcballs on Jan 7, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions
I dont particularly care
what your intention was…… its your whole manners second generation I findied quite distastefull… been following the steelers since the 60’s and and a die heart steeler fan since 69, converted my brother to steeler nation, raised my son the same, and this yr bought my eldest grandson his first football and offical steeler jersey, been spelling coachs name wrong for 40 yrs suppose that synaptic pathway is long closed.. my original post was nothing more then fluff… rather then a simple heads up spelling correction….you decided to use craft a belittlement reply to one whose soul and and blood sweat and tears in the steelers far exceeds yours…… best off keeping your sarcastic self away from me in the future…..
reply’s for your need only..
by OR69faithfull on Jan 7, 2012 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
I find it awesome that you actually went
to “I’m more of a Steelers fan than you are” territory.
And it’s funny the manners thing, I can’t remember if it’s actually considered better manners to call someone pecker head or penis breath.
Let me know when you get a chance.
"I respect everyone on the football field. But some people I don't like. And some people I dislike even more." - James Harrison
by steely mcballs on Jan 7, 2012 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
I think an apostrophe is missing
it happens
Players who should be in the Hall of Fame: Pat TIllman, Dwight White, Donnie Shell, L.C. Greenwood, Ray Guy, Steve Tasker, Jack Butler, Greg Lloyd, Andy Russell, Cris Carter, Kevin Greene, Curtis Martin, Willie Roaf, Andre Reed and Jerry Kramer
"Back in my day we killed five hookers and thought nothing of it" Craig James
by WVPiratesfan on Jan 7, 2012 10:32 AM EST up reply actions
heh heh
"I respect everyone on the football field. But some people I don't like. And some people I dislike even more." - James Harrison
by steely mcballs on Jan 7, 2012 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
Very True
That Bills team doesn’t get enough credit. Another team like that is the Eagles under McNabb, who definitely weren’t as good, but still worthy of mention.
Patriots feat impressive...
But people who cheat oftentimes look more impressive than they really are. Interestingly. :)
I'll be hiking the Pacific Crest Trail from May, 2011 to Sept., 2011, to raise money for charity. For more info, please visit: http://thf2.wordpress.com
by Fifty-Eight on Jan 6, 2012 1:04 AM EST via mobile reply actions
safety tip
Regarding the Patriots, the article indicates:
“New England who’s been playoff bound eight times in the past ten seasons. Interestingly and impressively enough, the Patriots won the AFC in each of those eight seasons.”
I think, Michael probably meant to say that the Patriots won the AFC east division in each of those eight seasons. Nonetheless, as much as I dislike that team, that is an impressive run.
Looking to the future, if there is a Harbaugh Bowl in February, I will be violently ill. I am talking biblical proportions, dogs and cats sleeping together kind of illnesses.
I really am hoping for a Steelers- Packers Redemption Bowl.
Keeping the Faith.
Use your powers for good.
I think the volume of vomit induced in Steeler Nation, resulting from a Harbaugh Bowl...
…would be enough to fill a lake. In our misery, we could create a city by its shores, filled with miserable, self-loathing denizens whose only response to outsiders would be to berate them, and castigate them for every fault these denizens find in themselves….
….oh, wait, Sorry, our efforts would be redundant…that lake is Erie, and the town is Cleveland.
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
And I mean this literally
What is your objection to the SF Harbaugh? I get why you don’t like John, and feel similarly, but am curious what the objection is to Jim. It’s fine if you have one, I don’t take it personally, I just don’t see why folks object to him.
And, nice dig at Cleveland- bit of an easy target, but that doesn’t mean what you said wasn’t pretty accurate.
"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will
by lottwasgangsta on Jan 7, 2012 6:03 PM EST up reply actions
With the actions of Young Whinebaugh this year...
…Websters will now publish the following definition
Harbaugh –
noun: one of two irritating brothers coaching professional football teams
adverb: bush league acting leader – ex: The crybaby coach acted Harbaughly by dis-respecting the opposing coach
verb: “To Harbaugh” – to complain to those in authority incessantly until desired result is attained ex: The head coach harbaughed the referees all night
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
In 2007....
Tomlin admitted he drove the team too hard…Hence we lost to the Jacksonville Jaguars…
Since then, we’ve become an experienced veteran team, and the team knows how to handle the regular season in order to be ready for the postseason… Therefore I have confidence in our team that fatigue will be a non-issue in this postseason… Go Steelers!
I don't know
I think Tomlin pushed Roethlisberger too hard. I give a mulligan for the SF game, because the doctors cleared him and he had come back the week prior and he had extra days to rest. However, after evaluating how poorly he played and seeing our sucess against SL with Charlie, I feel he made the wrong decision in Cleveland. They ranked just one spot higher against the run than the Rams. I believe his tendency from ’07 rose up again with his qb, and again- I think the Steelers will pay for it…maybe even this week as injuries continue to linger and cause shuffling every day.
Agreed
It would’ve made much more sense to at least start Batch and give him the opportunity to make Ben’s presence unnecessary.
Disagree
I think Ben plays worse when he’s “rusty” than when he’s “hurt”. Ben’s biggest flaw is his decision making. Specifically, taking the quick pass vs. waiting to see what develops, or the check down vs. the deep bomb. I’m not saying I’m happy he’s hobbled. I’m saying I’d rather have him and the OL and the WR’s all in sync than have Ben mobile and have everyone else mis-communicating. A lot of the offensive pieces surrounding Ben are still fairly young.
by StarSpangledSteeler on Jan 6, 2012 10:56 AM EST up reply actions
the fatigue
and the 2 stupid decisions to go for 2 pt conversion
In the above article, regarding the Patriots it is written:
" New England who’s been playoff bound eight times in the past ten seasons. Interestingly and impressively enough, the Patriots won the AFC in each of those eight seasons."
Clearly they have not won the AFC in each of their playoff seasons, but instead have one their division, the AFC east.
At any rate, here is a personal fact- if there is a Harbaugh brothers Super Bowl. I will be ill.
Use your powers for good.
you are correct
meant to include East in there. They’ve won AFC East every year.
Contact me at behindthesteelcurtain@gmail.com or michaelbean06@gmail.com with comments, suggestions, complaints, etc. Find BTSC on Twitter. Follow BTSC on Facebook for regularly updated content and commentary.
Injury update
Brian Dawkins will be out for the Broncos. Their FB, a key blocker in their spread option, and a ST contributor, also hasn’t practiced all week.
In addition, well-known Patriots fan “Middlesex” picked the Broncos to win by 3 on MHR.
Middlesex was also confident that the Steelers would lose to the Patriots earlier this year.
"If you havin' dragon problems I feel bad for you son, I got 99 arrows but my knee took one."
In fairness
The Patriots had a pretty good chance of beating us. But the Broncos… I don’t see it. I call wishful thinking and/or intentional disrespect.

by 































