Steelers GM Kevin Colbert Suggests Team May Use Franchise Tag on WR Mike Wallace
As the wheels of Steelers GM Kevin Colbert's Salary Cap Reducing Machine keep churning along, he expressed an interesting possibility today regarding Steelers WR Mike Wallace, who's currently a restricted free agent.
Per Scott Brown of the Tribune-Review, using the franchise tag on Wallace is still an option, despite their desire to ink him to a long-term deal.
If the Steelers were to give Wallace the franchise tag, instead of tendering him at the highest level of restricted free agency, they would essentially be buying the insurance of an additional first-round draft pick in exchange for approximately $7 million if he does not sign a long-term deal.
Players given an exclusive rights franchise tag cannot negotiate with other teams at all. Non-exclusive rights tags carry with it the ability to negotiate elsewhere, and if that results in an offer, the original team has the right to match it. If they choose not to, the second team must give the original team two first-round draft picks.
For example (and this is not a real situation), if the Steelers give Wallace a non-exclusive franchise tag, and Wallace negotiates a deal with the Minnesota Vikings, and the Steelers do not match that deal, Wallace goes to the Vikings and the Steelers get Minnesota's next two first-round draft picks.
Brian McIntyre of Football Outsiders broke down a range of projections for franchise tags in the upcoming season. The old formula for determining the tag's value was the average cap number of the current top five paid players at each position. Under the new CBA, it's the average of the top cap number of that position over the last five years.
The difference won't be much in 2012, and McIntyre puts the wide receiver tag between $9.443 million and $9.806 million, depending on the final amount of the 2012 salary cap.
Wallace's high tender RFA amount would be around $2.6 million, according to McIntyre.
What Colbert is implying, per Brown, is that they'd use this year's franchise tag on Wallace and pay anywhere from $6.8 million to $7.2 million more guaranteed over the restricted free agency tender to ensure hefty compensation in the event a team tries to sign Wallace away. All of this would be moot though if the sides come together on a long-term deal.
Colbert could be saying it in a way of expressing the franchise's desire to do everything necessary to continue negotiations for that deal. However, it seems unlikely that any team would be willing to give up two first-round picks for a receiver who would have to battle hard to prove he's the best receiver on his own team (or at least battle harder than he does for balls in the air). As such, it seems all the more puzzling that the front office might give Wallace $9.4 to $9.8 million guaranteed - with 100 percent of that counting against the cap - given the Steelers current salary cap situation.
If that's the measure of Colbert's resolve to get a deal done, it's good to hear. Wallace is one of the most dangerous receivers in the game, even if he isn't one of the most complete players at his position.
However, if Colbert is being serious and does intend to use the franchise tag on a restricted free agent for the first time in team history, he's either just giving Brown lip service while working toward that long-term deal, or he needs a vacation and some time to think things through.
38 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As talented as Wallace is a $10 mil cap hit seems like too much.
"Kompromise, my friend, is the essence of diplomacy, and diplomacy is the kornerstone of love... sweeeeeet looooOOOve"
Yeah, it may be a tad much. They could, you know, just give him his first round tender for a third of the price. I just don’t see a team giving up a first round pick for Mike Wallace, along with signing him above the $7 million per year range.
Colbert just could be saying it so Wallace can hear publicly how much they want to keep him. Best way to do that is to get him an extension.
by Neal Coolong on Feb 13, 2012 7:47 PM EST up reply actions
He’s like a 100 yard dash Olympian going against high schoolers
by Neal Coolong on Feb 13, 2012 7:56 PM EST up reply actions
Sometimes I just forget how amazingly fast he is. I appreciate the reality of this reminder.
HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."
"Oh... you're a northerner. What exactly do they call 'you people' from Pittsburgh?" "They just call us LUCKY."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arKd8qnPB-I
This was also awesome and set a Steelers record. …but he is still not worth a $10 mil cap hit.
"Kompromise, my friend, is the essence of diplomacy, and diplomacy is the kornerstone of love... sweeeeeet looooOOOve"
by CheekyMonkey on Feb 14, 2012 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
I want to see
How he does in Haley’s offense
by BlackandGoldTSgt on Feb 13, 2012 8:54 PM EST up reply actions
He can really flourish
I think Haley will challenge him to be better. Much like he did with Larry F. and Dwayne Bowe.
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 13, 2012 10:10 PM EST up reply actions
Early in the season he was fearless going over the middle and he was making insane catches. Hopefully Haley can help him recapture that.
"Kompromise, my friend, is the essence of diplomacy, and diplomacy is the kornerstone of love... sweeeeeet looooOOOve"
by CheekyMonkey on Feb 14, 2012 12:06 PM EST up reply actions
Question for you capologists
Personally I would rather keep Brown. If we give Wallace a monster deal, how do we also find the money to sign Brown?
Don’t get me wrong, I love Wallace! I just think Brown is the versatile receiver and bigger all around threat.
So, how will this affect our ability to keep Brown?
Hope the cap increases quite a bit
I remember early projections of the salary cap for 2012 were a bit higher than they ended up being. They have the TV contracts coming up, and those are going to be enormous, and with that, the cap will increase.
by Neal Coolong on Feb 13, 2012 9:56 PM EST up reply actions
It's a concern but manageable.
but I don’t think there’ll be a monster deal for Wallace. The Franchise tag isn’t intended to be his salary for 2012 but rather an insurance policy until he’s signed for a longer range deal which could be worth $7M/year but hit only $5M next year.
The hope would be that the cap grows to free up some room and that older contracts expiring will free up some room. Consider also that Hines is a $4M cap hit who will be gone. Hampton also is a huge cap hit this year which is $4.8 base and $3.2 Bonus. The bonus will hit the cap this year regardless of him being cut or not but will be gone next year unless they sign him with a big bonus again which seems likely considering his age and injured status.
by Steely McSmash on Feb 14, 2012 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, Brown is under contract until next year. But eventually the money runs out. Can we really afford to pay two receivers $7M per year?
the cap is expected to jump in 2014 i believe
so yea we can.
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 13, 2012 9:20 PM EST up reply actions
I donno, as awesome as they are I’d rather be paying at least some of that money to a couple of guards or tackles. I like the 3000 pounds mantra of what’s his/her name.
"Kompromise, my friend, is the essence of diplomacy, and diplomacy is the kornerstone of love... sweeeeeet looooOOOve"
by CheekyMonkey on Feb 14, 2012 12:09 PM EST up reply actions
the cap will jump
so crazy high that we will be able to afford what we need. The TV deals should be insane with the NFL breaking TV records every year with no signs or slowing down. Of course that is going to push a lot of vet money higher but it will give us space to keep some players
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 14, 2012 12:11 PM EST up reply actions
I like the tag, only if we can't sign him
I would much rather get a long term deal then the tag, but we should give him the tag if we can’t a deal.
I would let him walk for another first round pick..
I do love the guy, but this is business..think what 2 first round picks could do for the O-line!!
A man is innocent untill proven guilty...Even if it's Ben Roethlisberger!
'I rather have a German division in front of me than a French division behind me'..General George Patton
" I don't care if he has two horns and a tail, as long as he is anti-communist"..General Douglas MacArthur..
"The way to end our dependence on foreign oil is to keep our tires properly inflated"....B. Hussein Obama
"Government is not the solution to our problems, it is the cause of them" Ronald Wilson Reagan..40th President of the United States
Anyone would give up Wallace for two first round picks, but there is not one GM in the league who is stupid enough to do that. Hell, I would consider giving up Polamalu for two firsts.
"If you havin' dragon problems I feel bad for you son, I got 99 arrows but my knee took one."
she said another 1st round pick
meaning giving up Wallace for 1st rounder
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 14, 2012 12:12 PM EST up reply actions
So who would you replace Wallace with then?
George W Bush was the dumbest president the U.S.A. has ever seen. - me
Conservatism is a disgrace to the democratic political process. - me
American imperialism causes global conflict, death and destruction. - me
History will judge Ronald Reagan as delusional and responsible for the birth of American Social Darwinism. - me
America as a beacon on the hill for mankind is over rated and a lie. - me
…Randy Moss!!! Straight cash homie!
by ShamrockSteeler on Feb 14, 2012 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
but then
the receier corps is almost a one man show with Antonio Brown. Sanders seems good but I don’t know if he’s a legit #2.
WR is one of the hardest positions to evaluate with probably more 1st round busts than any other position. To get the WR corps back to where it is now, you’ll need to spend multiple picks on WR talent.
by Steely McSmash on Feb 14, 2012 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
What are the odds of these teams giving up their #1 pick?
NE #31 – Coming off a SB loss this team could use a proven vertical threat to open up the underneath zones for their TEs and Welker. Also the signing of a player thought to “put them over the top” could help them resign their own players.
SF #30 – A deep threat opens up the running game and gives them the ability to score from anywhere on the field.
Houston #26- Many mock drafts project Kendall Wright to fall no further than this slot, because Houston would love to have a deep threat to combine with Johnson. Pick your poison Wallace or the running game.
Cleveland #22 – Is there anything sweeter than getting better while seeing a division rival get worse? If the Browns get RG3 without having to trade this pick, Wallace gives him the same type of deep threat he connected with all last year in college.
If each team averages a 50% chance of making the move, then the chance of one of them signing him is 93.75%. Given that 3 teams are in the AFC, how would an extra 1st round pick and losing Wallace help the Steelers be better this season?
How does using the franchise tag help the Steelers? First of all, I think playing on the franchise tag would be a last resort. The Steelers will use the tag to keep anyone else from signing him away or if they cannot reach a new contract, trade Wallace. Trading Wallace under the franchise tag does not cause him to lose any value, if fact it would add flexibility to a trade for a team like the Vikings or Jags who might want to trade a high second and future 2nd or 2 thirds to get him. Regardless of how it works out, franchising him would give Colbert more options than allowing him to receive a tendered offer they could not match.
its more fear than reality
consider a few things…. 1) It’s actually two #1 picks for any team that signs him.. so the team that signs him will get better and subsequently… their #1 picks will get better 2) in the past 5 years.. only 2 wide receivers were given franchise tags: antonio bryant and vincent jackson. neither one of them signed with other teams in the year of their franchise tag. 3) if it was a quarterback, shutdown corner or a defensive end…there would be a greater likelihood of a team making a solid offer.. but wideouts.. even good ones are rather plentiful… we took brown in rd 6… and you can argue that he is better than wallace…. so it’s much more fear than reality.
One pick, not two
If the Steelers place a first round tender offer on Wallace, they only get one first round pick if he signs with another team, not two.
by Greig Clawson on Feb 14, 2012 9:34 PM EST up reply actions
Teams with 2 First rounders
I would assume that they’d have to deal their original first round pick would they not?
That would mean that the Brownies wouldn’t be dealing the #22 pick but the #4 pick. They picked up #22 from ATL last year.
Also note that NE would be dealing their #31 and they have #27 by trade already. They also have 2 picks in the second. It makes sense for them since their WR corps is so bad and brady is getting old.
by Steely McSmash on Feb 14, 2012 12:36 PM EST up reply actions
trade
I’d rather have Brown than Wallace, so if it comes down to having to choose which WR to sign next year, I’d rather trade Wallace now, and get something for him….rather than lose him to free agency next year. Keeping both would be great, but if there is cap trouble this year, is next year going to be much better?
Plus, trading Wallace would free up some cap space, and help stock up for the future.
I’m not going to be surprised if the Steelers trade one of their star players. Wallace & Mendenhall would be the two most likely (even though Mendy’s trade value is 0, now that reports indicate he may miss all of 2012).
Trading Wallace just doesn’t make that much sense to me, he can be one of the building blocks going into the future, hes only 25, quite possibly one of the fastest if not the fastest contributing players in the NFL. If we trade Wallace this year we are looking at WR corps of Brown, Sanders (injuries have set him back), Ward would have to be resigned in the fading twilight of his career and have to be counted on to perform, Cotchery is a free agent too. We need our WR’s to be solid with the uncertainty coming out of the backfield. Reports are Mendenhall may start the season on PUP and miss 6 games and its a crap shoot after that.
by ShamrockSteeler on Feb 14, 2012 10:58 AM EST reply actions
That’s assuming the Tomlin and Haley don’t view him as a one trick pony. He needs to be able to do more than stretch the field, especially if our receiving group is all going to be 5’4 and under.
by Frank Mineo (DYMS) on Feb 14, 2012 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
He had opened up his game during the beginning of the season and was doing well. Once he began drawing the double team Antonio Brown began to flourish. The combination of those two is what makes it work.
by ShamrockSteeler on Feb 14, 2012 12:43 PM EST reply actions
Uhh..
Isn’t an increasing salary cap in 2014 relative to what players will expect to get in their contracts? I mean, if the cap goes up 20% won’t players (average, and generally speaking) be seeking/expecting increased deal at somewhere around 10-20% higher than it is now, since they (and their agents) know it’s availble? If so, then a salary cap raise is only a temporary aid, like, until existing contracts rollover.
by Nate36bus on Feb 14, 2012 9:58 PM EST via mobile reply actions
After all that has been said and done
this looks like a normal Steelers screen to move up Wallace´s value to other teams and to push back to a smaller tag franchise for the Steelers, and also that last info about BB injured shoulder could have impacted towards the lack of productivity of Wallace in this year.
Personally I will give a shot at Wallace in this season 2 see if He can improve his numbers with a better O-line an a more balanced attack, that I hope by the end of the year could be improved by Mendenhall contribution if He stays with Us, and I think that Batch, Redman, Dwyer, and anybody else will put Us in a position 2 not need another RB, but also having Mendy its going to b very funny.
And welcome Myron Rolle.
O sales tickets,...and let D rest a little, and D Win Championships.

by 

































