Joe Greene on Steelers Offense Under BA
Ed Bouchette writes an article in the Post Gazette in which Joe Greene shares his opinions on the Steelers offense of recent years. This is the link to the article:
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/12035/1208112-66-0.stm
There is nothing he says that hasn't been discussed at length in various critiques of the BA offense before, such as:
- It's not about the ratio of run to pass, but the commitment to the run. You don't just call the run because someone told you to.
- The offense was too predictable. You could tell when the pass was coming and when the run was coming.
- Inability to control the clock late in the game - keeping too many opponents in the game for too long.
I recommend the read. It's a good set of observations coming from a well-placed observer.
108 comments
|
Add comment
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Here's a live link to article.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/12035/1208112-66-0.stm
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
Great points from Mean Joe
Of course, I say that because they back up my own observations, but the fact is that he has experience and credibility based on who he is.
“If it doesn’t feel good, you have to change it and, basically, it wasn’t feeling good,” Greene said Friday. “It wasn’t feeling good in ‘09, and it wasn’t feeling good in 2011.”
I thought it was especially telling that he criticized the offense in ‘09, which I did myself in a FanPost after the season ended. In fact, I think that Mean Joe made the points better and more succinctly than I did in my post, but I felt, just as he said, that if the offense had performed better in key situations, opposing teams wouldn’t have had the opportunities to come back in ways that they did, particularly in the 2009 season.
I think his best points were that if you looked at the Pats and Giants, they would run out of passing formations and vice versa, so that their offenses were not so predictable. That certainly lines up with the criticisms that I have seen on here of Arians’ offenses. It also explains why they would so often go through extended offensive droughts in the second halves of games.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 4, 2012 8:10 PM EST reply actions
This was the best line
“You don’t just call the run because you get tired of throwing it or because someone wants you to.”
by Toronto Steeler Fan on Feb 4, 2012 9:48 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah
Basically, his whole point was there seemed to be no real plan with the offense to put itself into a position to confuse the defense at opportune times. That like you quoted is a perfect example. You don’t pull a play out of the air to see if it works.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 4, 2012 9:59 PM EST up reply actions
You mean
If every time your offense motions to trips on one side, and you throw a bubble screen, that’s a bad idea? Especially when it gets to the point that every CBS announcer can predict it?
The glare of the spotlight is harsh, and the pressure that success breeds immense. We revere our heroes, but expect much. And criticism can come as easily as praise.
Perspectives become reality.
Twitter: @shanecglass
When Suggs start
recognizing plays you know you’ve done it 10000000 times before.
I love the Steelers.
by tannofsteel84 on Feb 5, 2012 8:56 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe Joe
read your post! ;)
"Leave the gun. Bring the Canolis."
Yep
This article is a must read.
HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."
"Oh... you're a northerner. What exactly do they call 'you people' from Pittsburgh?" "They just call us LUCKY."
great post and article
As you say, alot of what the discussions were on this site. Even the armchair coaches saw what Mean Joe did.
Don't think for a second Mean Joe isn't also speaking for management, too.
He’s a trusted member of the Steeler family, and would not wander of the reservation on a matter like this.
I would kill everyone in this room for a drop of sweet beer.
- Homer J. Simpson
+1
The silence from Management since the article was published speaks volumes.
by Steeler Nation VA on Feb 6, 2012 11:30 AM EST up reply actions
It says that they aren’t going to respond to the opinions of a former player that hasn’t played in over 30 years. Or it could say what you think. We’ll never know
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
He's a Steeler employee
It means that either they agree with him or what he said was at the very least not controversial enough to warrant a correction if they don’t.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 6, 2012 8:45 PM EST up reply actions
Okay I Will be the fly in the soup
Joe Greene is Steeler Legend and Hall of Famer but is is also a special assistant in the Steelers personnel department. Did anyone really think he would say the move was wrong when you look at his role in the front office. Yes the Arians haters have a lot to love about this article. But there are a lot of red flags in the article too.
Again to me, all the Steelers had to do was say we are not not renewing his contract we wish him well. The more I here members of the Steelers front Office speak about this the more I go “Really!?” like Kyle from South Park. To me every time someone opens thier mouth more questions come up. Mean Joe just added a lot more to the pile:
1. If the Steelers had smart play calling in offense they would be in the Superbowl this year. Really!?
2. When someone asks you if you agree with something you answer you do not disagree with it. Really!?
3. The 32nd run offense runs the ball “pretty good”. Really!?
4. Arians is slamed for not running when obvious, but the Patriots are praised for running on 3rd and long out of shotgun. Really!?
5. Offensive Play Calling was the reason for missing the playoffs in 2009. Really!? (Here is a link to replays from 2009. It still hurt to look.)
They wanted him gone he is gone. They should stop saying things that undermine thier decision. To me the problem with the run game is not about playcalling, fullbacks or hiding the fact that you want to run. For some reason, even before Arians, the Steelers have had problems with 3rd and short and 3rd and goal. Remember the Divisional Playoff game against the Colts and the Goldline plays against the Seahawks in the SB. QB sneak was easy solution but Ben hurt means it is not an answer. To me it is not about hiding you want to run. It is about running when they know you want to run and getting the one to three yards you need. What is sad right now is that a WR sweep on the goal line not a trick call but the right call. The running stats show a commitment to the run. The problem is the return on the commitment is not as good as it could be. It is more about execution than play selection.
On 1/18 the Steeler were sceen has 12-1 favorites to go back to the SB next year. Only 3 other teams had better adds an NE was the only other AFC team before team. The front office did not make it clear how this move helps them better thier odds and at this point because of how they have handled this I do not think they can. To me 12-4 and wait and see do not mix.
Who has the most wins in the regular season, post season, and SBs since 1970?
I think I’ll trust the opinions of those folks over yours.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 5, 2012 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
But he plays defense.
Yes and he knows when an offense is predictable. That is the problem.
by Steeler Nation VA on Feb 6, 2012 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
Well...
No Losing seasons, 4 Playoff appearances, 2 SB Appearances and 1 SB over the past 5 years under Arians did not matter to many Arians critics. At what point does winning and playoff performance matter in evaluating a coach?
by Willard Taylor on Feb 5, 2012 9:30 PM EST up reply actions
And how many top defenses?
The BA apologists always point to the moments where the defense came up short during his tenure, but the fact is that the defense was consistently top 5 and usually number 1 during his tenure. And, then of course, the answer will be that the defense had so many top picks while the offense had to make do with the left overs.
Bottom line is that the FO saw the same issues that BA’s critics saw. This was not a knee jerk reaction. Rather, it sounded like they were unhappy with his performance in years past as well and just chose to move on this time.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 5, 2012 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
hit the nail on the head…the FO wouldnt have decided not to renew his contract without careful consideration. IMO, most of our offensive struggles came from playcalling
I'm sure that OL issues played into it
but I just didn’t see BA do a good job accounting for that. I know it’s true that he had the best offense the Browns had since the expansion, and that offense had the Steelers on the ropes in 2002. But, his offense also went stone cold late in the game, allowing the Steelers to come back and win the game. We saw the same hot and cold inconsistency with him as OC for the Steelers. Clearly, the FO did as well, and they thought there should be more consistency.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 6, 2012 12:08 AM EST up reply actions
Typical Arians Offensive Philosophy
Surge to a lead with a good opening script. Make no adjustments as the opponent adjusts to your scheme. Continue to throw the football and fail to milk the clock allowing opponent to stay in game. Defense tires from being on the field. Steelers hang on for dear life.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
by 5020 on Feb 6, 2012 9:41 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
And How Many Wins???
BA hates seem to aways side step the wins and always ingore when the offense came up big. Blow double diget leads in 4th quarter, Special teams screw-up and many and Troy Hurt and BA Haters and some in the front blame Arians playcalling for the 2009 colapse. When you look at the two Cleveland games I sam Turnovers more than play calling.
The Bottom line is the FO gets to make the choice they want. I just do not like smoke being blown up my butt. Do not bring up stablity at OC when when can look at what is going on at the DC.
Now it seems wins only count when BA haters say so.
by Willard Taylor on Feb 6, 2012 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
O'Donnell, Barry Bonds, Bob Bonilla...
and other well respected players always played great all season long and won a lot of games for Pittsburgh Not a BA fan but respect your opinion WT. BA had the best and most prolific offense in Cleveland Brown history since the new Browns. The Steelers played for 2 Lombardi trophy’s.
Its just this Pittsburgh sports fanatic grew up on Clemente, Maz, Stargell, Bradshaw, Noll and Lemieux. These are guys that close the deal in the biggest of games. O’Donnell was a shrinking violet. IMO so was BA. He could score some points but was never a great game manager or play caller. He had issues when the competitor made adjustments or ran a surprise scheme. Mostly he couldn’t milk the clock to victory like those before him. He couldn’t do that anywhere he ever coached. He never learned. He never adjusted. Too stubborn to be a head coordinator. A better team layer than leader. His ideal position was WR coach under The Wiz.
When You Run The Ball Good Things Happen
an actor has no business chiming in on football conversations like this
"I think the beard will decide when the time is right to come back. It will know when the time is right and all of a sudden appear." -The Deisel
Yeah, just because he has played, or worked in some capacity for the Steelers, for 30 some years, doesn't mean he knows what he's talking about.
"They timed it perfectly, they just went too soon." - Darrell Waltrip commenting on an illegal restart.
Okay I Will be the fly in the soup
It sort of appears as though that’s your goal in most situations.
That said, it always makes me cringe when former players chime in to the media.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
Nope
I just have my limits. Knocking the the former OC by saying how the 32nd ranked run offense was pretty good. Two things to note:
1. The 32nd Run offense just won the Super Bowl (By the way it really helps when you have no turnovers.
2. A former fired Pittsburg OC just won his 2nd Super Bowl. Maybe being fired in the NFL is not as bad as we think. lol
Must be nice for fans to want to fire the HC and OC. :)
SB XLVII Battle of the Class of 2004. Ben vs. Eli. The Quest foe the Third Ring. (How is that for a fly lol)
by Willard Taylor on Feb 5, 2012 10:14 PM EST up reply actions
The biggest problem with Arians
The biggest problem with Arians wasn’t that he wanted to air it 40 plus times in bad weather with a crappy offensive line or that he completely forgot Heath Miller was on the field, or that Rashard Mendenhall and before him Willie Parker were good RBs…no, those were the 7th, 8th, and 9th things wrong with Arians.
The biggest issue with Arians is that he became Big Ben’s enabler. He let Big Ben do pretty much anything he wanted without any repercussions. There was no accountability. None of us have to hear every week when Big Ben takes one coverage sack after another, “oh that is just Big Ben trying to make a play”. Sometimes, it took the Steelers out of legitimate scoring opportunities, other times, it got him seriously injured like against the Browns.
Arians’s relationship with Roethlisberger got so big that even the head coach could not dismiss the assistant. No, the damn owner had to “retire” the assistant coach. That speaks volumes of the situation.
Say what you want about Arians winning a Super Bowl and getting to another. How many head coaching jobs is he up for? Heck, the only job he could get is a lateral move with Indy, who is likely not gonna be good for a while given their current situation.
The pressure is on Big Ben this year. Whiz and Big Ben did not get along because Big Ben is a drama queen who wants to be the center of attention. He does not want someone telling him no, which Whiz did often times. I bet Arians told him no a handful of times in the last five seasons. We won because of Whiz and the great defense in 2005 and we won in 2008 in spite of Arians and the defense and the QB always bailing him out. Did Arians call the play to Holmes in the end zone? I seriously doubt it. Did Arians call the play for Big Ben to scramble around for 5 seconds, shake off 2 DEs, and find Mike Wallace 40 yards downfield? I doubt it. If backyard football is your best offense, you need to consider an alternative.
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.- Mark Twain
by steeler_chris_5 on Feb 6, 2012 12:00 AM EST reply actions
The biggest issue with Arians is that he became Big Ben’s enabler. He let Big Ben do pretty much anything he wanted without any repercussions
Where do you people get this crap from? How much power do you think an OC has? Do you work for the team? Are you around at all the practices to know that your statement of Arians being an “enabler” is true? Or is that just your thoughts after watching a few sideline cuts during a broadcast?
I’m being serious. I see these kind of statements all the time, I’d like to know what facts support your opinion, or whatever inside information you have that we don’t.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
No, but when he keeps on making the same moronic decisions and terrible reads just to throw his (usually poorly thrown) deep ball, it’s pretty clear no coach is getting in his ear and telling him to cut that shit out.
No, but when he keeps on making the same moronic decisions and terrible reads just to throw his (usually poorly thrown) deep ball
These are things we can actually see, that is understandable.
it’s pretty clear no coach is getting in his ear and telling him to cut that shit out.
How? or Why? Because they don’t make a public display of it? That is not Tomlin’s style. The organization seemed to have gotten tired of Cowher being like that before. They don’t want it out in public like that. We don’t know what happens in the locker room. Like after the Cleveland game when Tomlin said they don’t handle family business in front of company.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
It’s pretty clear because nothing is happening. I don’t have to see anything to know the results haven’t changed.
Why blame BA though?
Isn’t that more the responsibility of the QB Coach? Shouldn’t Tomlin say something? Or his teammates? That’s just Ben’s game and has been for his entire career. I don’t know how you can place all the blame on BA for that
I’m guessing they ran those deep balls in practice on Lebeau’s defense and succeeded – probably numerous times. I also think during the course of a game there are “throw away”(pun intended) series of downs (as long as you don’t throw interceptions) that are factored into a game plan – try it and see if it works. I also think the idea of “throw it deep” to open up the run game is overrated. Both BA and Ben(alongside numerous other football analysts) say the same. Maybe BA called those plays.
You have to expect to let the a pro bowl SB winning QB make decisions, and of course the O coord should allow for plays that the QB either likes or thinks is effective. Whether it’s succeeds is another story, but I think all this talk about Ben doing what he pleases is exaggerated.
Here is some evidence
Charlie Batch chooses to say Arians draws up plays that Ben likes, he does not say plays that work along Ben’s strengths or the strengths/ weaknesses of the team. http://www.yardbarker.com/nfl/articles/charlie_batch_talks_about_future_of_hines_ward_bruce_arians_dennis_dixon/9259097
Charlie could have mispoken, but he was at the same time, specific.
I hope some of the people reading this are old enough to remember the movie Days of Thunder with Tom Cruise (a NASCAR driver) and Robert Duvall ( his crew chief). The driver goes all out, that is his style. The crew chief asks him to pace himself. To resolve their differences of opinion the crew chief asks the driver to go 100 miles or laps your way and 100 my way and we will see which gets the best results. The driver was wearing out his tires and lost speed and was blowing up engines. The crew chief’s way resulted in a faster time.
Ben wants to go all out, the OC need to know what is best for him and find a way to convince him of it.
Good comparison
and i love that movie.
"Leave the gun. Bring the Canolis."
This is America, Frank.
Get used to it. People make assumptions about everything, and ignore what’s plainly in front of their face, or what isn’t.
Never let facts get in the way of a good story judgment.
It happens here as well
I am sad to say, heck I am even guilty of it at times.
anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Feb 11, 2012 1:58 PM EST up reply actions
This is what we need
Giants’ offensive game plan was the difference in SB XLVI
The Patriots were so concerned with the Giants’ explosive passing attack that they routinely aligned in Cover 2 on early downs to protect their corners from being exposed in isolated matchups. The tactic certainly limited Manning’s attempts to attack down the field, but the Giants countered by repeatedly dropping the ball to running backs and tight ends in the flat following play-action fakes. The threat of off-tackle runs lured the Patriots’ linebackers to the line of scrimmage, while the vertical routes by the outside receivers forced the cornerbacks to vacate their responsibilities in the flat. As a result, the fullback or tight end was repeatedly left unguarded in the vacant area, leading to short gains that helped keep the Giants in manageable situations on second and third down.
This is one of my beefs with BA and Big Ben – He just wants to go long.
The Giants stayed patient with the running game. New York finished the regular season ranked 31st in rush offense, but made it a point to establish the run in the Super Bowl. The Giants opened the game with 16 runs in their first 35 plays, and featured an assortment of off-tackle powers to attack the Patriots’ vulnerable edges.
Our running game is so predictable – The formation dictates the play call.
Gilbride took advantage of the Giants’ favorable matchups in the passing game. When evaluating its personnel prior to the game, it was evident New York’s receivers enjoyed a sizeable advantage over their Patriots defenders. Gilbride exploited those matchups when the game was on the line. He featured Hakeem Nicks prominently in the game plan to take advantage of his superior size and speed against Kyle Arrington and Devon McCourty in base formations. Nicks was targeted repeatedly on shallow crossers and square-ins over the middle, and he hauled in a few quick screens that isolated him against cornerbacks on the outside. When New England used its dime package with a bracket on Victor Cruz, in particular, the Giants instructed Manning to go to Nicks against Antwaun Molden on the outside. As a result, he finished the night with 10 receptions for 109 yards with several key third-down conversions.
Ben forces the pass and does not take what the defense gives him. This falls on the OC and QB coach being able to coach him and not be his friend.
by Steeler Nation VA on Feb 6, 2012 11:03 AM EST reply actions
I agree.
Ben forces the pass and does not take what the defense gives him. This falls on the OC and QB coach being able to coach him and not be his friend.
HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."
"Oh... you're a northerner. What exactly do they call 'you people' from Pittsburgh?" "They just call us LUCKY."
Exactly right
And Brady will happily Complete 12 straight 5 yard passes to move the chains
We were too greedy with Ben and BA
You Had One
The Steelers Under Bruce did run the ball quite a bit in the playoffs. Ben the QB that some feel needs to get his act together has more playoff wins than all but 7 QB’s in the history of the NFL. Of the 27 QB’s with 10 or more playoff starts only 6 have a higher win %. People seemed to have helped him okay so far.
By the way if the Steelers get rid of Coach Dad will secondary mistakes go away? I do not think so but they may want to try it also.
by Willard Taylor on Feb 6, 2012 11:28 PM EST up reply actions
I saw significant improvement in the secondary this year with only one season with a new DB coach. Once again, things rarely go away overnight but you can’t deny that there was major improvement in play.
I’m no huge Todd Haley fan but I sure am ready to see the same significant improvement in redzone and 3rd down numbers. If he can help with that, then we all win.
HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."
"Oh... you're a northerner. What exactly do they call 'you people' from Pittsburgh?" "They just call us LUCKY."
Secondary mistakes? The team had the number one passing defense in the NFL without a lot of sacks. Find another comparison.
Those secondary ‘mistakes’ cost the Steelers critical games, specifically a higher seed and home field advantage, as well as the loss to the Broncos taking them out of the playoffs – and both (actually all three) games were a total meltdown.
So call them “situational” mistakes, but they are mistakes nevertheless, at crucial times.
Notice how the Giants had a Fullback
by Steeler Nation VA on Feb 6, 2012 11:27 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
True
That FB got a 32nd ranking in rushing offence. Please rember winning Superbowls do not matter to some win looking at offensive perfomace.
by Willard Taylor on Feb 6, 2012 11:33 PM EST up reply actions
Youre constant reminder
of the 32nd ranked rushing attack for the Giants is getting old. Bradshaw missed nearly half the year, and the Giants played a lot of high scoring games where they had to throw a lot more.
"Leave the gun. Bring the Canolis."
Really?
And the constant hypocrisy of some Bruce Arians haters is beyond old. It is Jurassic. Bradshaw missing 1/2 a year is understandable to be ranked dead last in rushing, but 10 different starting OL combinations and a “one leg QB” is seen as a weak excuse for redzone zone and rushing problems this year? A member of the Steelers Front office and some posters inferring that they hope the team could run as well as the 32nd rush office and then complain about how the offense under performs is old to me.
People wanting a change in OC I can understand. I may not agree but people do not have to agree all of the time. Everyone is a little hypocritical. People want what the want. I get that, but there are limits. Pointing out how getting a FB could help the Steelers run as well as, again THE 32ND RANKED RUSH OFFENSE, happens to be line too far for me.
Sorry for being old fashion.
by Willard Taylor on Feb 8, 2012 12:48 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Using Jurassic leaves you somewhat prone to a retort highlighting your rather forceful style of argument
From my point of view, the critical mistake you continue to make is to equate past success with that of the future, not to mention confusing the fact that we won a Super Bowl with BA and Big Ben to signify that we should be gracious. This presume that, with the talent we had, we should not have won more than that.
I feel the last two years were missed opportunities, and I think the front office feels the same. We have an aging core and one of the best QBs in the history of the franchise and so far we have two Super Bowls to show for it. That is amazing, but it could and likely should be more. Of that classic core, how many are left: Hampton, Farrior, Smith, Ward are at the end of the road. Harrison and Polamalu have a few more years left, but that is a lot of atrophy.
Perhaps even the parameters outlining the changing dynamics of the team require that we change the scheme of the offense to utilize the new strengths of our defense. And again, you can bold 32nd-ranked rush offense all you want, but they seemed to do a pretty good job in situational football and on the biggest stage, breaking quite a few explosive runs, using that FB as a solid receiving option out of the backfield, and converting critical short-yardage situations that won them a championship. Don’t a few more of those sound nice?
"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."
-- so says Rex Ryan.
From my point of view, the critical mistake you continue to make is to equate past success with that of the future, not to mention confusing the fact that we won a Super Bowl with BA and Big Ben to signify that we should be gracious. This presume that, with the talent we had, we should not have won more than that.
Is this sarcasm? May be it is just me but I have no problem giving slck to a OC and QB that have:
5 Straight + .500 Season.
4 Playoff Appearances
3 Division Titles
2 SB Appearances
1 SB Win
I can roll with this. More would be fun, but not seeing many who have better than this. It may come back to haunt me but in life I look at how things worked in the pass to see how they work in the future. It does not always point to the choise that I make but it does help.
No matter how you cut it dead last in rush offense does not sound like a good sitiuational run team to me. That may just be me. Believe it or not the Steelers have run the run pretty well in the playoffs. It would be nice if they could finish the game with the same line they started with in the playoffs consitantly..
False starts, holding and injuries I would look at before a FB.
by Willard Taylor on Feb 8, 2012 4:34 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
as many times as you want to type “32nd ranked rush offense” I am going to point you to the 06 Colts. (Rush defense) Just like the Giants this year, they weren’t good most of the year. But they were in the end…when it actually mattered. You are missing the point of what he meant.
I mean I do agree with some of your points on the hypocrisy of the most vocal Arians haters that hate him just because they need someone/something to hate. But in this instance, you are missing the point.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
Dead Last is Dead Last
This is what I remember from the 2006 Colts Run:
Sanders was a difference maker in 2006. The Colts gave up 199 yards rushing per game during the regular season while he missed 12 games after having arthroscopic surgery on his right knee in September. He returned for the playoffs, and the Colts allowed just 80 yards rushing per game on their way to the Super Bowl title. Sanders followed that by winning the 2007 Defensive Player of the Year award.
To their credit the Colts did not blame all injuries on problems, but it is hard to ignore how the injuries hurt the run defense. The injuries and personel changes over the past two years hurt the Steelers offense. Maybe if some of the OL starters returned at the end on the year like the Colts. They would have gotten better.
I get that there are some people that simple hate Arians. So be it. People like what they like and want what they want. The ’06 Colts Rush Defese is even a worse point than this years Gaints Run offese.
I am very happily on point.
by Willard Taylor on Feb 8, 2012 3:35 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Big Ben....Step Up
I’m afraid Ben might not have IT! I agree, Arians was an “Enabler”, Buddy type. We’ve had The Tools. They just were NOT used right. Hopefully, that will change. I don’t see Bean as a Mature Man, ready to Lead a team, though. Scary!
you lost me
Ben Might not have “IT”?
Criticize the inconsistencies, but his track record in crunch time is HOF worthy. He has after all won 2 SB’s and been to 3 – something tells me that he’s an OK QB. I sure won’t be unappreciative after living through the dark years between Bradshaw and Ben.
No, Ben has it
Mark Sanchez, Jimmy clausen, and Rex Grossman are the ones who “dont have IT.”
"Leave the gun. Bring the Canolis."
Haley being reported as Steelers new OC
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7548154/source-pittsburgh-steelers-hire-todd-haley-new-oc
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
A Storm is Coming
Expect a BIG problem between Ben R. and Todd Haley. It is going to happen.
by dklml2 on Feb 6, 2012 9:39 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
How many Steeler fans remember that Giants OC Gilbride was the OC for the Steelers for one year — I think it was 2003? He was pass happy, the Steelers stunk that year, going 6-10 or something like that. Cowher fired him. The good news was that the Steeler’s bad season earned them a high draft pick and they drafted Ben R.
Cowher and Gilbride were oil and water. Those two didn’t share many celebratory IC Lights after those big 6 wins.
HERE WE GO STEELERS!
"Our Father, who art in Pittsburgh, Football be thy game. Thy Kingdom come, thy will be done, at Heinz Field as it is in Heaven. Give us this day, a stellar D and forgive us our bogus fines, as we (sorta) forgive Goodell who trespasses against us. And lead us not into defeat, but deliver us a Victory. For thine is The Steelers, the power and glory of climbing the STAIRWAY TO 7."
"Oh... you're a northerner. What exactly do they call 'you people' from Pittsburgh?" "They just call us LUCKY."
I think that was '98 or '99
Gilbride tried to fit Stewart into a pocket passer offense. Frankly, I think he’d be pretty successful with Ben as QB.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 6, 2012 10:11 PM EST up reply actions
Gilbride years
That was in 1999 and 2000, after the Ray Sherman disaster. Because in 1997, Chan Gailey made Kordell Stewart look so good, Jerry Jones gave Gailey the head coaching job. Sherman came in, and was so bad he was gone after one year. Gilbride wanted to run his offense with an emotionally fragile and not very accurate Kordell, and that didn’t work either. Mike Mularkey turned Kordell back into a respectable QB and got a head coaching job with the Bills.
While I can understand the grievances against Arians (I was one of the main stone throwers), he had to go. He was likely promoted in 2007 to placate the veterans on offense like Hines Ward, Alan Faneca, and of course, Big Ben after Russ Grimm did not get the head coaching job (I thought Whiz was never in the hunt seriously, which is why he took the job in AZ so fast). Arians was garbage as a head coach at Temple (I know, it is Temple), he was garbage as an OC with the Browns (I know, it is the Browns), and he was garbage with us. When Terrell Suggs can jump the WR screen for an INT, that means your offensive playcalling is predictable. The Steelers’ best offense in the last 4-5 years was Big Ben scrambling around, shaking off a DE and/or LB, and finding a receiver 40 yards deep for a TD pass. I seriously doubt that was in the Arians playbook. Arians’s best asset is his “people skills”, not his tactical genius. There is a good reason why no one wanted Arians as a head coach.
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.- Mark Twain
by steeler_chris_5 on Feb 7, 2012 12:30 AM EST up reply actions
Maybe Ben should realize...
…he was successful in spite of Arians for this very reason
The Steelers’ best offense in the last 4-5 years was Big Ben scrambling around, shaking off a DE and/or LB, and finding a receiver 40 yards deep for a TD passbecause he had to scramble, as opposed to being successful because of Arians.
United we Stand, melded like Steel
To Roger Goodell, We'll never Yield.
Well stated
"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."
-- so says Rex Ryan.
What I really don’t get though, is why you are still going on and on about him. He’s gone, you got what you wanted, yet you still have the obsession. Why?
I think I have the answer. Don’t worry though…his replacement will step up soon. (not the next OC…just the next convenient scapegoat)
And when that happens, you can pretend you have inside knowledge of that too.
I do find your assessments amusing though. Anyone who fails in Cleveland must be garbage lol. Oh..and Temple too. How could he possibly ruin that annual powerhouse that routinely gets the best recruits in the country?
Most amusing though. You are so dedicated to your thoughts, that you actually have the nerve to blame Suggs INT on Arians. The obvious thing is that Ben was going to go to that side no matter what. I saw Suggs waiting on it right at the snap. Ben should have too. But as always, when you have your scapegoat picked out you can imagine anything that goes wrong to be their fault..eh? You do know that BEN prefers that stupid screen play right? You do know that it is BEN that is supposed to execute the play right? You do realize that Ben has multiple options on every play? But hey…it’s got to be Arians fault when he picks the worst possible option.
I am curious though, if our offense sucks next year, do you think it will be William Gay’s fault? It’s been a while since he was the scapegoat….don’t you kind of miss it?
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
If it sucks, I will be the first
If the offense sucks, then I will be the first to admit wrong for trying to rail out Arians. It amuses me that you are an Arians apologist. As for William Gay, chances are he will be someone else’s whipping boy because I am betting he will receive a multi-year deal elsewhere while the Steelers are busy trying clear cap space.
As for the Suggs INT, Arians likely called the play and Big Ben threw the pass. Trust me, Big Ben should have never thrown it. Arians should have never called it. As for comparing LeBeau and the head coaching, first, LeBeau was a head coach at one time and it did not work out. Also, LeBeau is in his mid 70s. Arians is still in his late 50s.
One last thing about Arians: if Andrew Luck or whoever is the QB for the Colts has a monster season and the Colts field a respectable team (just for the sake of saying, like what the Panthers had with Newton this past year), then I will lessen my venom toward Arians. I seriously doubt it will happen. I couldn’t care less about your own personal thoughts towards me. If you like Arians so much, then write to Art Rooney II. The real question is, how are you going to react if the Steelers have top five offense to go along with a top 3 defense and go back to the Super Bowl?
BTW my favorite Steeler whipping boy will always be Bubby Brister. Sean Mahan was for one year almost took the title. William Gay definitely goes in the top 10. Arians in the top 3.
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.- Mark Twain
by steeler_chris_5 on Feb 8, 2012 8:50 AM EST up reply actions
First. I am not an Arians apologist. I just find the kind of shit you Arians condemners try to blame on him. It gets old after the 5 millionth time.
Arians likely called the play and Big Ben threw the pass
Yep, this says it all. Your outside opinion, based on nothing, forms your argument.
Ben should have thrown it…to the left side, where it was one on one, and no one was expecting it.
I am glad that you “couldn’t care less” yet you chose to respond with a four paragraph comment just for me. I’ll tell ya…people I couldn’t care less about..they get a big fat nothing out of me.
But let’s get back to the topic at hand. Your ridiculous claims that you pass off as fact despite having absolutely NO knowledge of the situation. In fact, your attitude is so arrogant, and your blinders are so effective, that your immediate response to my comment was to somehow claim that I loved Arians or had no blame to lay on him. This is common…I understand.
But, for the sake of playing along, I will answer your question. And that is “I’d be happy” because unlike you, my loyalty lies with Steeler success, not trying to prove my point that some part of the organization is messing everything up, even after a three year string of success. People like you are happier seeing the offense fail, just so you can think you’re right about Arians than you are seeing the Steelers win.
Enjoy your anger and bitterness. And I will enjoy your endless rants about Arians…even if the inevitably stretch on for at least 3 years after he’s gone.
It’s always nice to have someone to blame, even if they aren’t fully responsible.
Enjoy!.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
Good luck to you too
Good luck to you too Frank. I guess you are a bigger Steeler fan than all of us. And who says I am bitter? I am actually happy with the direction the Steelers are going in right now. I will enjoy your trolling and have a good laugh about them. Cheers homie.
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.- Mark Twain
by steeler_chris_5 on Feb 8, 2012 5:31 PM EST up reply actions
I looked over my comments, I was unable to find where I said or suggested that I was a bigger fan than “all of you” whoever that includes. I’m only talking to you, and I never said I was a bigger fan than you. But that same arrogance from your fan post signed apparently by all of us, is the same arrogance you are using with that comment. You speak for you, and you only. Others may agree with you, but you are speaking for yourself.
My trolling? Funny stuff. You are on many different threads throwing any jab you can think of at Arians, even though A) Everyone is fully aware of the situation and B) He’s not even part of the organization anymore. That is much more troll like than my finally responding to your one billionth (so it seems) ridiculous comment that is just like this one:
When Terrell Suggs can jump the WR screen for an INT, that means your offensive playcalling is predictable.
I can’t remember if you were the one that blamed Ben’s motorcycle accident on Arians, but who cares..it’s all the same. Why stop there? It’s his fault Sushi sucks, it’s his fault Hampton and Keisel got injured, it’s his fault we got Tebowed, and it’s his fault Harrison got suspended.
The guy is gone, I really hope you can move on.
Maybe you can tell us how
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
Sushi is good
You do not speak for the rest of us (see what I did there :)
"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."
-- so says Rex Ryan.
No, I don’t. I said Sushi sucks, and I was speaking for me, and me only. I would never claim to speak for other people unless they appointed me to do so.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
I think you are engaging in revisionist history.
More to the point, it seems a bit odd to make generalist statements about others while remaining somewhat blind to how it might affect your arguments.
But what do I know, personality A and personality B in my head can never seem to agree
"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."
-- so says Rex Ryan.
Ehh
I have had my morning caffeine and regret this comment. My opinion of you has changed from reading comments in another thread; I guess I just got a little annoyed at the talk of "Arians haters’
"It's football the way it's meant to be played. That's who Pittsburgh is, and that's who Pittsburgh has always been."
-- so says Rex Ryan.
Well that is certainly your right. And there is no need to regret your comment. The only difference I can think of between sushi and Arians is that I have watched Sushi try to play. I’ve seen him miss many kicks, and have seen the coaches have so little faith in him that they’d rather take two sacks in a row. Now, with Arians, he could make a lot of mistakes, or whatever. But we have people on here blaming him for injuries, motorcycle accidents, sexual assault charges, stupid throws by our quarterbacks, offensive line deficiencies that make it difficult to run at times, etc. That is what annoys me. Much like Willie Gay, the guy became a convenient scapegoat for anything and everything that went wrong in Pittsburgh.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
Imagine how they feel frank. You want it to be written forever that you think tuna suck? I mean, they’re abused already by the japanese and cat food manufacturers, and now you.
Geez.
I don’t care man…they are the ones that chose to be spicy tuna rolls. They could have chose a different path and made themselves in to Tuna Casserole. They thought they were so much better by going the spicy route…how is that my fault?
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
Not your fault? Are you kidding me? WTF man!!
It’s people like you that spread rumors and twist perceptions to make it seem like it’s the tuna’s fault that they aren’t a casserole or salad. Spicy tuna isn’t trying to be something it isn’t, or even standing on a soap box proclaiming superiority.
Back off, dude!!!
Hey…spin it however you want…the fact is..Spicy Tuna Rolls suck, and it’s their fault, not mine, or anyone else’s
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
Tuna Salad Sandwich
The rest of the Tuna just fail in comparison but it must be fresh thick slice white bread and mayo (or MW for purists).
Anything else and there is a small chance of tasting the tuna and I really don’t like tuna.
anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Feb 12, 2012 1:39 PM EST up reply actions
Motorcycle accidents
I think the people who were blaming BA for the motorcycle accident and alleged sex assaults were being facetious but that was just my take on it.
anyone trying to contact me via my yahoo account should be aware it has been hacked
by Cold_Old_Steelers_Fan on Feb 11, 2012 2:02 PM EST up reply actions
I disagree with that. I’m pretty good with context. The guy meant it. He was saying that Arians, as the OC wasn’t holding him accountable, before the fact..
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
BA wasn't even the OC then, either!
The nerve of that guy!
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 12, 2012 5:43 PM EST up reply actions
I won't do it
I won’t drag myself down to an argument with other Steeler fans, especially since we all want the same thing: Steelers bringing home number 7. Yes, I never cared for Arians, and he is gone. I made a lot of comments about it. I am happy. I have moved on. I apologize if I have offended you in any way. Let’s move on dude. And is Sushi Suisham?
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.- Mark Twain
by steeler_chris_5 on Feb 9, 2012 8:39 AM EST up reply actions
Yes, Sushi is Suisham, because he’s always cold, and he stinks.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
But sushi tastes so good! lol
I do agree, we need a new kicker. I am hoping for someone like Carson Wigg in the draft, perhaps rounds 5 or 6.
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.- Mark Twain
by steeler_chris_5 on Feb 10, 2012 11:20 AM EST up reply actions
Also, I’m a little confused. Why the hell didn’t you turn in your application after Arians left? It’s obvious to everyone that you are the foremost authority on how to run the Steelers offense. Why didn’t you put your name in the hat? Were you just so arrogant about your genius that you expected them to come find you? That makes sense. Oh well…maybe next year..
For your sake, I hope Haley fails, so you have the opportunity to show some initiative next season and apply for the job. I understand that you are an offensive genius, but you have no experience…you have to get your name out there.
Can I get some hot sauce for my doughnut?
What do you see when you vist the Great Hall at Heinz Field?
You see 6 Lombardi Trophies not yardage trophies.
The bottom line in football is scoring. The Steelers ranked 27th in points per yard gained. That is the problem. We racked up yards, but very few points for the effort.
The play calling was predictable. Yes they ran the ball, but had trouble in the red zone.
Were there reasons for the problems this year, yes. But these same problems were there the last 4 years as well. Ariens has not addressed them – OL, BB getting sacked & injured, predictable play calling, Ben holding the ball too long, Ben throwing long to Wallace when he can’t move or the wind is blowing etc and not taking what the defense gives them, etc.
Ben and Arians may be best buddies. This is not a good relationship between boss and subordinate. Do I think that Haley may be an over reaction, possibly, but he has gotten a lot out of those players in the past. I do not care if the two of them vacation together, I care about results.
Tomlin now has an OC that will give it to him straight and not tell him what Ben wants.
by Steeler Nation VA on Feb 8, 2012 12:56 PM EST reply actions
Great article!
“We could throw the ball when we had to, and we could run it when we had to. That’s football! You do what you have to do when you have to do it — run it when you need to, throw it when you need to. It’s not all one way. I think that’s what we didn’t get.”
Exactly, Mean Joe. Considering how the season ended, everyone in this organization should be expecting and embracing change. It wasn’t like anything that this team did last year was good enough or up to its standards.
When you line up 3 WR you can gurantee a bubble screen is coming, He was not using the WR and TE’s the way he should and Mendenhall has good hands and should have seen screens to him or 20 plus yards. WE are stocked at RB too in Mendenhall,Redman, Clay, Dywer, and Batch. Best play I seen was against Denver when the run was coming instead Wallace going accross the front and a pass where he walked in. Him and Ben became to much as friends and BA was not improving his QB play, Ben can be a great QB not just a top 10.

by 





























