Steelers' Depth at Offensive Tackle Presents Unique Challenges in Wake of NFL Draft

PITTSBURGH - SEPTEMBER 12: Max Starks #78 of the Pittsburgh Steelers is carted off the field after getting injured against the Atlanta Falcons during the NFL season opener game on September 12 2010 at Heinz Field in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania. (Photo by Jared Wickerham/Getty Images)

When Steelers LT Max Starks went down with a torn ACL in Denver during an overtime loss in the AFC Wild Card playoffs, it very well could have altered the Steelers' offseason plans.

Even with the return of RT Willie Colon, the Steelers went from what could have been a fairly deep position with some flexibility (Starks, Colon, Marcus Gilbert and Jonathan Scott all have starting experience, and Scott and Starks have played both tackle positions in the past).

Instead, Starks, just two days shy of his 30th birthday, blew out his knee, forcing the Steelers to look deeply at the position.

First, Gilbert was told he would be moving to the left side, a move that wasn't all that much of a surprise given his growth as a player in his rookie year and his athleticism. Colon's return after a torn Achilles' heel in 2010, followed by a triceps tear that kept him out of nearly the entire 2011 campaign, could solidify the right side.

But offensive tackle still remains a questionable position in terms of depth. Neither Chris Scott nor Trevis Turner (both practice squad members in 2011) have done much to boost support for their respective causes, leading one to consider the Steelers may look at the position in the draft.

Some speculation has existed, seemingly for four years now, of the possibility of moving Colon inside, while replacing his spot at right tackle with Scott ($2 million cap number) or a rookie (like they did last year, although not by original design, with Gilbert in 2011).

It will be interesting to see how the Steelers play their cards concerning the position on first round draft night. It's a popular position for first round picks, for obvious reasons. We've highlighted Cordy Glenn as a guy who could potentially play tackle or guard, a pivotal characteristic for a team lacking depth at both spots. Stanford's Jonathan Martin has shown flashes of potential, but not enough consistency, which may drop him into the Steelers' range at No. 24. Ohio State's Mike Adams has a similar rep as Martin, and will likely be available when the Steelers go on the clock.

To free up money to bring Starks back, Scott, who has the biggest cap number of all the Steelers' reserve players, would seem to be the one they'd let go; however, it seems counter-productive to release him if their goal is depth. Keeping one veteran at that position would be the wiser move, considering this unit's amazing history with injuries. While they did sign Swiss Army Offensive Lineman Trai Essex, he cannot be counted on as a legitimate long-term starting candidate.

Ideally, if they're looking to start Gilbert and Colon this year, a lower-priced veteran and possibly a rookie backing those positions up would seem the most logical path. The issue is, they can't count on Starks returning immediately, and will have to come up with a plan of attack that doesn't involve the long-time Steelers veteran.

That could be to go with a guy like Glenn, if available, at No. 24.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Behind the Steel Curtain

You must be a member of Behind the Steel Curtain to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Behind the Steel Curtain. You should read them.

Join Behind the Steel Curtain

You must be a member of Behind the Steel Curtain to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Behind the Steel Curtain. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.