For Tomlin, Competition is King
Another classic entry from datruth4life.
We've all grown accustomed to "the Chin" in Pittsburgh. Well, how about us calling Tomlin "Mr. Comp," because of his belief in how important competition is in defining a team. Throughout training camp and even going into his first game, Tomlin let it be known that competition will define who the starters will be week to week as well as ultimately the direction and accomplishments of this year's team.
I am a fan of any coach who lets his players decide who will be the starters by the way they play, as well as how much time the backups will receive through their play on the field also. I think Cowher had lost that, since he committed early on to his players whether their performance was waning or not. Examples of this blind loyalty to players this past year were: defiantly having Ricardo Coclough return punts though even he and his grandmother knew he shouldn't be back there; giving the job to Chris Gardocki this past year when Mike Barr beat him out in training camp; having Joey Porter play a whole game when James Harrison was a better pass rusher and more effective player and should at the very least subbed for Porter on some series; continuing to send out Santonio Holmes to field punts when he was shaky as well.
All of these moves ultimately cost Cowher, as well as his decisions to rush Big Ben back in the lineup for the second game after his accident and the removal of his appendix and later in the season after his concussions. I can't remember a player who had two concussions as Ben did this past year and played the following week on both occasions. Also, Colon probably should have been in the lineup a lot earlier this past year than the final two games because Max Starks was terrible (and Simmons to a lesser degree) this past year. Now on to what you've been waiting for. My thoughts on the Cleveland butt-kicking:
- Dick Lebeau is a genius! Did you guys notice that on that first series, he provided Charlie Frye with a look that he had never before displayed in the preseason or regular reason? The Steelers, on third down, came out with a 4-1-6 look, with the four pass rushers being A. Smith, Chris Hoke, Casey Hampton and Brett Kiesel. Talking about coming after Frye with some beef! The dime linebacker was Farrior with six DBs in the game. Aaron Smith got the sack, but more importantly, that puts the Steelers best DLs on the field in an alignment that no one can run against. Just one more look from the wizard.
- Big Ben, glad to see you back. That's the QB that was MIA this past year. As long as our defense plays like that and our special teams delivers that type of field position, Big Ben doesn't have to take as many chances and can throw the ball away when there is nothing there. Honestly Ben, it is okay to punt.
- Bruce Arians, you are making a believer out of me. I thought the Steelers would be in trouble if they get away from the running game, but they might just have to pass first to establish the running game. This offensive line isn't going to blow anyone off the ball nor give Ben 6 to 7 seconds to pass on every down. So, BA is correctly focusing on matchups to try and get chunks of yardage to help this team be most effective on offense. Spaeth and Miller in the red zone could give this team a whole different dimension. I like both of those big bodies on a LB or a safety down there.
- Holmes and Ward are going to cause a lot of secondaries headaches this year. Yes, Baltimore Ravens, I'm talking about you too. Let's just hope that with this OL, Ben will have enough time to get the two the ball. That block that Santonio threw to help out Ward exemplifies why the Steelers chose to pay Hines the big money instead of Plaxico. Ward sets the tone for the wide receiving corps and the offense as a team leader. You still don't know what you will get from Plaxico on a week-to-week basis. Talent isn't the only thing when it comes to making such decisions. Attitude and the ability to show up every week counts a great deal as well.
- Ed Bouchette is one of the best pro football writers in America, but I don't agree with his argument that the Steelers made a mistake in trading a conditional 7th round pick for Allen Rossum. For those of you that don't know, Ed has written that acquiring Rossum has set off a domino effect that: has robbed Santonio of his rightful job to return punts since he had a higher punt return average than Rossum this past year, put 3rd round pick Willie Reid, the team's regular kickoff and punt returner, on the game day inactive list; caused the team to cut C Marvin Philips and put him on the practice squad; and cause LT Jason Capizzi a spot on the practice squad that is now occupied by Philips. This is why I think Ed's argument is hogwash. No. 1, Rossum is a better and more confident returner than Willie Reid is right now. Rossum showed good hands yesterday and the type of quicks on at least a couple of the returns that gives you the indication that he could break one. With Reid, I just wondered if he would catch the ball. How many of you wanted to see Reid back there trying to catch punts yesterday in that driving rain? Yeah, I didn't think so. No. 2, for all the good that Santonio did this past year for the offense, he still put the ball on the ground too much as a returner. What's wrong with having a former Pro Bowler as a returner that will allow Santonio to concentrate on trying to be a Pro Bowl receiver. And just like Tomlin's philosophy, what's wrong with giving Reid some competition to get back on the field? No. 3, apparently the Steelers aren't as high on Capizzi and I and most of the Steelers fans are. If they did, they would have kept him on the regular roster or cut one of the 7 other players besides Philips on the practice squad to give him a spot. And since no other team has signed Capizzi to their practice squad, maybe the Steelers are right. I, however, don't think so. I still think Capizzi, with a few years of seasoning, could be a starter some day at LT. And by the way, a rookie free agent tackle from Howard University saved the day for the Redskins yesterday when Jon Jansen left the game in the first quarter with a dislocated ankle. The player that rookie RT Stephen Heyer stoned all day yesterday: your former Steeler All-Pro, Joey Porter.
- There was a Lawrence Timmons sighting yesterday. The team has him as one of the primary gunners on the punt team and is working him at the ILB in the base defense. I think these are the right moves for him since he has trouble holding the point of attack as an OLB in the 3-4. Having Timmons means that the Steelers will have a seamless transition at RILB when Farrior steps aside. Timmons' game right now is speed and playing in space. Give him a year of learning and another 10 to 15 pounds, and he'll be ready to make a move for a starting job next year. Still, having someone who can play inside as well as put their hand down and rush on 3rd down gives LeBeau one more bullet for the chamber. I think one of the first day picks next year should go to getting a future bookend for Woodley at OLB. A couple of people to keep your eye on during the college season are Tommy Blakely from TCU and Quentin Groves from Auburn.
- I think next year will be the perfect time to rebuild the offensive line. From what I've seen so far, Alan Faneca is not at the level that he once was and would not be worth making him the highest paid guard in the game. By letting Faneca go, the Steelers will get a 3rd round pick in draft compensation the following year and can slide Kendall Simmons to left guard and put Kemeautou in the RG spot, which would be better suited to his mauling style. Kevin Colbert will do what he always does when it comes to filling a position: he'll sign a free agent tackle or guard with some upside who is coming off their first contract and then use 2 high picks on an OT and OG to come in and compete at that spot. At least the Steelers line for 2008 is under contract and will probably look like this: M.Smith, K. Simmons, Mahan, Kemeautou, Colon. Someone will overpay Max Starks and the Steelers could possibly get a 3rd or 4th round pick for him when he leaves after this year as well.
- I hate to rain on your parade fellas, but Willie Parker is a fumbler. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then that animal is a duck. Willie led all RBs this past year in fumbles with 7. He fumbled in the preseason and he fumbled yesterday and he put the ball on the ground during the Steelers championship run two years ago (the Denver game comes to memory even though the officials later reversed the call and said he was down; it could have gone either way). Either Willie will have to go to the Tiki Barber school of holding the ball in a different way so as not to fumble, or Tomlin has to show him that putting the ball on the ground will equate to being on the bench. I know some of you are saying, "How dare you consider putting an all-pro RB on the bench?" My response would be "Easily," if he continually puts the ball on the ground.
- Also, is there anyone else out there that thinks that Arians had better put together more of a power package with Davenport or Carey Davis getting some carries with Kreider at FB when this team goes up against a stout run defense like the Ravens or the Chargers? Parker's style of picking and darting doesn't work too well against those type of teams. You need more of a one cut and go type of RB with some power to effectively move the chains against those teams. I'd like to see some series where the Steelers would throw a bigger RB at them and maybe even just go two tight ends, 2 WRs and one back, spread the field and see if that will present some problems. Willie's inability to run against physical defenses and his propensity of late to put it on the ground is something Tomlin and Arians have to be concerned about.
- In all actuality, the Browns QB Anderson isn't that bad of a quarterback. If you give him the time, he can hurt you. The person that should be faulted for the team's dismal showing yesterday is Romeo Crennel. You don't take the whole offseason to evaluate your QB position, name someone a starter the week of the game and then pull that guy after 1.5 quarters of football. If that's the case, then Anderson or Quinn should have been the starter from the get go. My guess is that Quinn will be starting after their bye break and Crennel could very well be fired by then. Ultimately, the real culprit of Cleveland's demise is its poor drafting and free agency decisions and injuries the past few years. All those no. 1 picks that ended up being busts (ala Gerard Warren) has set this franchise back, and Braylon Edwards is no game-breaker. Unfortunate injuries to Bentley, Gary Baxter, and Winslow also hurt this team as well.
- If Winslow is indeed the "Future", as he calls himself, then I'd rather take the "Current," which is Heath Miller at tight end. The first guy doesn't bring Miller down and he has some of the best hands in the business, TE or WR. Winslow is more flashy, but you will win more games with someone like Miller, who can block, run and catch. In fact, I think Winslow is more of a big WR than an all-around tight end.
- I'm not joking when I say that special teams could be a strength for the team this year. I like having a dependable return man for a change and the coverage teams have better speed and bigger bodies. They kept Marquis Cooper over Chidi because they consider him a better special teams player, so we'll see what he adds once he is healthy. And Timmons, Woodley, A. Harrison, W. Gay, and C. Davis are all good special team players. With Buffalo coming into town this week with Roscoe Parrish and CB Terrence McGhee as returners, the Steelers are going to have to play solid on special teams to not let that phase hurt them.
- Let's see, James Harrison yesterday, 7 tackles, 1 sack and $1.3 million signing bonus. Joey Porter for the Dolphins yesterday, 3 tackles, 0 sacks, $12.5 million signing bonus and $20 million guaranteed. Yep, that's why the Dolphins are the Dolphins and the Steelers are the Steelers. By the way, I like that 6 sacks and 5 turnovers yesterday. That wasn't the same Steelers defense that I saw play this past year. I think Lebeau still has a few wrinkles up his sleeve. I'm still waiting for Keisel to make a big play in that quarter defense, though.
- As always, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Thanks for reading. Be blessed.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I have to agree on almost evey point
I have
fumbling and his ability against stout defenses.
Datruth is right, the boy fumbles. This one though, I think Tomlin will cure him of. Tomlin seems like the kind of coach who just wont put up with consistent fumbling.
More worrisome to me is his ineffectualness against the better defenses. Take last year for example:
A whopping 1059 of his yds came against just 6 teams, all of them with mediocre or even downright lousy defenses. Cincy twice, KC, Carolina(usually a good def, but last year at the bottom of the league), Cleveland, and New Orleans. That's a huge chunk.
Against S.D., Jax, Oak, Balt twice, Tampa, Denver, and even Atlanta and Cleveland once, he totalled 435 yds for a 3.06 avg. In just the Denver and two Balt games did the Steelers fall behinid early and have to throw. And I think the Atlanta game just turned into a shootout which hurt his stats. Not to mention, the O-line was a tad shaky last year, heh.
Now don't get me wrong, I do like the guy, but his dart and dash style just isn't going to get it done against teams that are normally tough against the run. If we are going to win the North this year, meaning if we are going to beat Baltimore, then something will have to change in this respect.
I couldn't agree more with the Porter issue, his stats were steadily declining, and I think the Miami deal will go down as one of their alltime worst.
Was it just me, or were the Browns kind of cocky when they were down 17-0? I was amazed at Winslowlife and some of the defense and returners when they were hotdogging down by three scores. That just shows what kind of coaching they have, IMO.
Crennel won't make the end of the season. His appalling handling of the QB situation there is his deathknell. I hate to say it, but it is satisfying to see the two star Bellichick recruits(Crennel and Weiss) failing so badly. I hate the Patriots and all their spawn.
Oh and Datruth, I don't think any of us would think you were joking about our SP teams being so integral. They were instrumental in us getting field position all day and I have never been more excited about our sp team situation than I am so far. Seppy nailed punts, we got good coverage, and somehow, limp-legged Reed actually got some touchbacks. Awesome SP team day.
Finally, Datruth, any chance you want to come to Arkansas to watch a Steelers game? Your analysis is always so in depth, I wouldn't miind seeing what you see for one game. :)
steelerark's observations
by datruth4life on Sep 10, 2007 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Oh yeah,
At least we didn't fumble as much as Baltimore
Disagree with the Frye-Anderson-Quinn situation
Normally I'd agree that you don't pull your starter that quickly into game 1, but that was some of the worst 1.5 quarters of offensive football anyone has ever seen. If such a thing were ever permissible, this was the time.
And that whole "If you give him time" thing is premised on having an O-Line that isn't a goddamned disaster. I actually feel pity for Quinn when he finally starts.
Agree about Parker
Steelerark, What you said about Willie against stout defenses just reminds of that Jacksonville game last week. I remember thinking that every time Willie got stuffed at the line, we needed a big power back who could turn that into 2-4 yards. Of the games that I saw last (couldn't see all here in a Atlanta), that one showed me what we lost with Bettis retiring. I'm hoping Davis or Russell can step up and fill that role for us.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Sep 11, 2007 10:45 AM EDT reply actions

by 















