Big Ben Succumbs to 'Superman Syndrome'
If you were watching the game yesterday in a venue where you could hear Dan Dierdorff commentating, you would have certainly heard him gush about Roethlisberger's 'escapability'. And Roeth most definitely did have a remarkable day making would-be sackers miss. Of course, he wasn't successful 100 % of the time - Ben was sacked 4 times after all.
Still that number could have been quite a bit higher had Roeth not made the first and second guy miss while in the pocket. And typically, when you are able to get outside the pocket and let your WRs break off their patterns in a busted play, good things happen. They didn't yesterday however, for whatever reason. I contend though that Ben too often shrugged off his safety valve in an effort to hit one of those big plays that frequently occur in a broken play. Ben had an opportunity to check down to Najeh Daveport on multiple occasions yesterday on those plays he made a Cardinals rusher miss. He didn't do so once.
Then there's the simple matter of holding onto the ball for too long. On several of those 'escapes', Ben was forced to make something happen with his feet because there was simply no time at all. Other times though, Big Ben held on too long, and the pocket understandably collapsed. Again, trying to do too much too often. As we predicted earlier last week, there were big plays to be had down the field. Ben of course knew this too, and I think he maybe tried to make a big play in certain inappropriate situations. That's always been Roethlibserger's achilles heel - there's no situation, no throw, no challenge too impossible to take on. I like confidence. I don't like pride standing in the way of danger awareness.
Then of course, there was the pick in the endzone. I had issues with the play calling on first and second down given how unsuccessful we were running between the tackles. So on third down, when finally given a chance to throw it in, Ben forced an impossible throw. It was actually a pretty impressive throw, but Miller was double, if not triple covered, and the Cardinals defender made a great catch. That play, of course, was the turning point, and the Cards never looked back.
The results were not disastrous from Roethlisberger yesterday, but he better avoid what I call the 'Superman Syndrome' for the rest of the season. There will be times when the Steelers will need him to make things happen impromptu on his own. Far more often however, Big Ben is going to do more harm than good when trying to go at it alone.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Blitzburgh, you're right on
-I think Willie Reid should be given a chance to take Wilson's spot on game days. Wilson cannot get off press coverage and is more mouth than production. Nate came close to making a couple of big plays. If he wants to be more than just another "guy" in this league, he needs to make them.
-Lastly, we are still having problems with teams spreading the field. I don't know if Lebeau didn't show more packages because Casey and Troy were hurt, but I don't think 2 DL, 3 LB and 6 DB will be able to stop the run. I'd still like to see the 4-2-5 and 4-1-6 packages that he used earlier in the year.
-Arians had to do a better job of helping Ben when teams shut down the run. How about going 3 WRs and at least opening running lanes? One thing is for sure. Teams are going to stop Willie and make Ben beat them as well as spreading the field on our D. If they can't overcome both of those, they won't make the postseason.
Casey Hampton
LSAT went ok. I got off to a slow start before finishing well, but unfortunately I felt I could have done better. Worked real hard leading up to it so kinda disappointing. That's life I guess! We'll see what I get and maybe I'll take it once more.
But yeah, what happened to Casey? Is he going to be out long?
Hampton
But that brings up a question for me. With Hampton and Hoke being the only NTs on the team, does that just totally screw up all of the special packages? In the 2/3/6 dime, was that Smith and Keisel or Casey with an end?

by 















