Was There Anything Else To Be Learned From Last Night's Steelers-Dolphins Game?
It's a sad day across the National Football League, as Sean Taylor has been senselessly murdered at age 24. Condolences to Sean's family, friends, and teamates.
I have a few more thoughts about last night's game that I might as well throw out there, even though most of us concur that last night's game barely resembled a football game:
- I'll lead off with Ricky Williams' return to the league. What did you guys think about his performance? I thought he looked pretty good out there actually. He was pretty quick with his first step and he found the small creases that were available on several runs. The announcers of course, fixated on the fumble and his final line: 6 carries for 15 yards and 1 fumble, but I thought all things considered he looked encouraging. He was forced out of the game when rookie LB Lawrence Timmons inadvertently stepped on his shoulder while going after the fumble, but I wouldn't imagine that the injury will linger.
- Speaking of Timmons, nice contributions from him last night. I'm interested to see if he is used next week in coverage packages against the pass-happy Bengals.
- James Farrior and Larry Foote dominated this game. Honorable mention should go to Tyrone Carter, who tackled extremely well, and Brett Keisel, who continues to have what I believe is his best season as a pro. Farrior and Foote though were fantastic. 11 tackles, 7 assisted tackles, .5 sacks each, and one forced fumble between the two of them. And that's not even counting the countless other times both were able to force Beck into early, errant throws. Most everybody looked good on defense for both teams, but I thought these two guys stood out above the rest.
- Mr. Huizenga, the Dolphins owner, has to be wondering where the Joey Porter we saw last night has been all year. Big, big night for Joey, and if he can find a way to play at that level for the next several years, maybe the Dolphins will feel they've gotten their money's worth. One of the few entertaining aspects of last night's game was watching Porter and his former teamates interact. After Hines gave Porter a little shake-and-bake over the middle and caught a first-down pass, then flashed a smile that was huge even by Hines' standards, I couldn't help but smile myself.
- Ike Taylor dropped another INT. Tough, slippery conditions, but we may need Taylor to make that kind of play when we face superior teams. Just a thought.
- Again, foolish to include this data point as relevant, but special teams play was solid last night. Allen Rossum broke off a nice return that should have led to points, Ted Ginn was contained all night, Sepulveda did his job, and Jeff Reed converted on the one play we absolutely had to have at the end of the game. Real quick, about the play-calling in that last series. First off, we should strike that final sack from the record. I don't think it was entirely unreasonable for Arians to want to punch it in for a score rather than rely on a FG attempt, even though it was a chip-shot. Not sure I like the calls on 1st and 2nd down, but on 3rd down, I imagine that Arians told Ben to take an initial look at what was open, and if nothing was there, to just take the sack. Of course, if his intention was to not rely on the FG and go for the TD, he needs to do a better job of play-calling. If he's going to call two crappy plays on 1st and 2nd down, don't all of a sudden risk disaster on 3rd down. He's been a bit schizophrenic lately for my tastes, and his performance, in my mind, is a bigger concern than the actual linemen themselves. He needs to mask their deficiencies better with his play-calling, and he needs to find a way to stay one step ahead of opposing defensive coordinators. For nearly a month now, we've taken the first punch rather than delivering it.
- Let's not forget that the Dolphins have been fairly successful running the ball themselves this year. Much has already been made of our line's inability to dominate, but by now, domination shouldn't be expected from this unit. Other than Mahan and Colon, I thought all our linemen had an acceptable game in the run game, including Kendall Simmons, who's been mired in what seems like a season-long slump. Let's see how we do next week against a Bengals team we match up well with in the trenches.
- I thought Tomlin had a shaky game with his decision making, but as has been said many times already, there hasn't been anything similar to the conditions we saw last night, and even the most seasoned veteran coach might have struggled with situational decision making. It's entirely possible we are forced to play on a similarly awful field in December or January (be it snow, or more rain), so we can only hope we took something from this game in terms of when and where to go for it, as well as what plays work in short-yardage situations on 3rd and 4th down. Here were the scenarios that kept us from putting up any points till the final seconds, even though we seemingly lived inside Dolphins' territory last night:
1)4th and 2 from the Miami 40: We go for it, electing to run Davenport up the middle. Should we have gone for it at the risk of giving Miami solid field position? I dunno, what do you guys think?
2)4th and 2 from the Miami 26: You obviously can't punt there, but a 44 yard FG attempt on that field? Not so sure about that decision. What really irks me is our 3rd down call: another Najeh Davenport run up the middle for -1 yard.
3) Miami's decision to go for it on 4th and 15 from our 31 yard line and on 4th and 11 from our 25 yard line. Agree or disagree with those decisions?
- The conditions forced our hand, but I was pleased to see us call more quick-hitting, short passing plays. I was nervous we might be tempted by our success against the Ravens throwing deep (also a sloppy track that night) to try it again last night. We didn't, thank God, or the sack total certainly would have been higher. Nice game by Hines holding onto the ball in traffic. Props to Cedrick Wilson as well for a solid performance with Santonio out of the lineup.
- From the comments section of the previous post by franz - a HS football coach who undeniably has more experience watching and analyzing football than myself:
First off however, for all of Miami's travails this year, the play of the offensive line hasn't been one of them. Before last night, Miami had surrendered only 17 sacks on the season through 10 games. Even after last night, they're in the middle of the pack in the NFL. We made their line look terrible all night, and I have a hard time believing that they all of a sudden forgot how to pass-protect. Part of the credit goes to LeBeau, part goes to the field conditions.
Now, as for 'rationalizing' the sacks from last night. 2 sacks through 3 quarters. On that field. Does that really alarm you that badly? Read above or go rewatch the tape of the final play before the FG as well to remind yourself that the 5th and final sack was conceeded by Arians and Ben, not a product of inferior pass protection.
The line is what is: not great by any means, but in my estimation, not horrible either. We're certainly stuck in an ugly three game stretch in which the line has looked horrible, but as I've stated before, there have been prolonged stretches of solid blocking by this group earlier in the season. Defenses have countered, Arians has struggled in his subsequent counter-punch, and all of a sudden we're in a long slump that has left many of us thinking that we're not good enough to get it done. Maybe so, but I still contend that there's enough time (clock's ticking though guys, better make it happen next week) to make the necessary adjustments to give ourselves a shot against the better teams still left on our schedule.
*************
This has been an interesting season up to this point. I know many of you are upset with the coaching, the blocking, and the inability of this team to impose its will on inferior teams. All valid concerns, and unfortunately poor play by the 0-line is one of the few things that is hard to overcome.
But here we are, 8-3, with the prize-fights of our schedule still looming. We have not been bitten too strongly by the injury bug, Big Ben is not compromising our chances with turnovers, and our defense - which you absolutely can not win championships without - has been playing at an elite level for the better part of this year. I appreciate all of you who have joined in the discussion this year. It's been an up-and-down ride thus far, and I, for one, am eagerly (as well as nervously) awaiting to see how the remaining, unwritten chapters will unfold.
0 recs |
19
comments
Comments
heh
With that, I'm oficially done with this game.
by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 12:43 PM EST 0 recs
good post
I feel a bit less critical of the Steelers than I did in earlier comments. Beyond the O-line, I don't think we have physical issues in terms of our players having enough athleticism to compete. I really think the problem we have is the fact that we play well enough to win games, and that's it - then we act surprised when bad teams have marquee games against us and make things close. You could arguably say that we haven't played a good football game since the last MNF against Baltimore - the loss was inexcusable and the two wins were way closer than they should've been.
I just want our guys to come out swinging for once. As much as I hate NE (and I do hate NE), credit them with having the tenacity to play hard every game, every down, and treat every game as if it were the crux of the season. Something tells me that there's no laughing off of inferior teams in Foxboro.
by dcfan on Nov 27, 2007 1:25 PM EST 0 recs
thanks for the feedback
by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 1:29 PM EST 0 recs
nice job blitz
I don't agree with the notion that the game was useless as an evaluation tool. We better do some evaluating, because it might be exactly the same quagmire next Sunday night. It was a terrible idea to lay new sod over old and the NFL can't be happy about what the conditions did to their primetime product. It was also dangerous for players. Someone in the NFL office might be wondering if the Cincy game should be played at another site and give the team two weeks to send in caterpillars to clear out the bog and put in Fieldturf.
After reading franz's posting on the other thread, I have to say I agree with him on many points but not all of his conclusions. I don't know how Franz came to the conclusion that we can't generate an adequate pass-rush. We did it last night and the only times we have failed to do so this year is when we rush just three and drop back. Our total of 32 sacks is third in the league.
However, Franz was right on in his evalution of play-calling. He was correct in saying that the muck actually allowed for better pass protection for exactly the reasons he noted.. The muck negatied LOS explosion. Run defense up the middle was better for the same reason, in that the O-linemen could not generate any explosion off the snap. I would also agree that Ben is not recognizing some defensive blitz packages. I don't think it was impossible to score TDs in those conditions but at the very least our field position should have resulted in three or four red-zone opportunities and short field goal attempts.. I agree with you about the Miami offensive line actually being a fairly respectable unit. probably better than the Steelers' O-line. The last sack was a dangerous and unnecessary play because Ben allowed it to happen while putting himself at risk of having the ball stripped. Make a short straight drop, try to find someone quickly and then throw it away or fall down in the middle of the field.
On some of your questions, I also thought Williams showed some nice footwork. The question is whether he is able to (or wants to) absorb punishment like he used to..
I thought Miami should have tried a FG on their second attempt. The kicker had basically been allowed a practise attempt on the first try and the distance was not a factor, only the footing. They weren't going to get a first down on fourth-and-long on a short field.
I liked going for it on 4th-and-2 but not running up the middle. Overall we wasted too many plays and seconds trying to run through a bog directly into a wet mass of bodies. The more time we ran off the clock without scoring, the better for Miami. We had some success running off-tackle and Ben was accurate with his passing, so go with that. I also agreed with the FG attempt; if nothing else it gave Reed a run-through of what he needed to do on his second FG attempt. But again, why were we running short yardage right up the middle when Ben has a hot hand and everyone is hanging onto the ball.
by steeler lifer on Nov 27, 2007 1:58 PM EST 0 recs
Cincy game
by cgolden on
Nov 27, 2007 2:24 PM EST
up
0 recs
no idea
I'll try to do some reading up about it, but my guess is we can get the field in somewhat acceptable shape by next weekend. It's already considered the worst field in the league by most players, so I'm guessing if they can just get it anywhere near an acceptable level, that'll be enough. Dunno, good question.
by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 2:30 PM EST 0 recs
my two cents
-- On the fourth down attempts I agreed with the Steelers decision to go for it but obviously they should have tried some different. Why Heath Miller didn't catch a single pass I'll never understand.
-- I didn't really understand Miami's decisions on fourth down though. If I was the coach I would have tried to pooch punt the ball and pin the Steelers inside the 5 and hope to sack Ben for a safety. I really thought the only way Miami was going to score was a defensive score. I was more scared of a 0-0 tie than the Dolphins putting any points on the board.
by cgolden on Nov 27, 2007 2:31 PM EST 0 recs
No, not in Cincy
On the positive side, having played one game now gives us a real homebog advantage. We'll get used to it and every team that comes in will be saying, ''You have got to be kidding.''
by steeler lifer on Nov 27, 2007 3:38 PM EST 0 recs
oh my bad
Yeah, I mean I want to watch quality football, and it's hard to play quality football on that kind of field. That said, we're 6-0 at home, so...
by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 3:42 PM EST 0 recs
Going for it on 4th down
As far as Miami's choices, they really made no sense. Why go for it on 4th and long in your own territory in a tie ballgame?
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Nov 27, 2007 7:08 PM EST 0 recs
Why not?
Either way, I'm with you - probably would've just punted. 0-10 or not, the score was still 0-0.
by Cotter on
Nov 28, 2007 10:37 AM EST
up
0 recs
There are risks
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Nov 28, 2007 11:16 AM EST
up
0 recs
And besides
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Nov 28, 2007 11:18 AM EST
up
0 recs
There were
by steelerark on Nov 27, 2007 7:22 PM EST 0 recs
Quick thought on Najeh
I like the 4th decisions, not the calls, for the steelers, not so much for 'Fins.
by Chicago Steeler on Nov 27, 2007 9:18 PM EST 0 recs
najeh
Many have pointed out that the line never gives him much to work with, but they shouldnt have to. He's in the game to rumble for 1-3 yard gains in short yardage situations. If the line were clearing gigantic holes, thered be no need for him in the first place, Parker could carry it.
Anybody ever heard of Javorski Lane at Texas A&M? Seen him play? He's a load and almost always carries guys with him for an extra yard or two. granted that's college ball where the LBs and defensive tackles are far worse, but I want the Steelers to have that type of rumbling force if we're going to insist on plowing up the gut on short yardage situations.
by Blitzburgh on
Nov 27, 2007 11:19 PM EST
up
0 recs
power back
There are power backs in that mold that the Steelers could look at if they really want to pound the ball on 3 and shorts. I doubt the Lions would ask much for TJ Duckett's services.
by cgolden on
Nov 28, 2007 8:08 AM EST
up
0 recs
Duckett
I do hope we make a move that helps out there, though.
by WolfpackSteelersFan on
Nov 28, 2007 10:16 AM EST
up
0 recs
Javorski Lane, hell yeah
Najeh shows flashes of his ability. But for the role we need him to play, we need consistency, reliability (and blocking). I'm not ready to let him go just yet, but I'm certainly not sold on him either.
Sometimes I think I'd be more confident with Verron Haynes back there on 3rd down...sometimes.
by Cotter on
Nov 28, 2007 10:43 AM EST
up
0 recs









