Behind the Steel Curtain: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Can Tebow Say No To Anything?

Was There Anything Else To Be Learned From Last Night's Steelers-Dolphins Game?

It's a sad day across the National Football League, as Sean Taylor has been senselessly murdered at age 24. Condolences to Sean's family, friends, and teamates.

I have a few more thoughts about last night's game that I might as well throw out there, even though most of us concur that last night's game barely resembled a football game:

  • I'll lead off with Ricky Williams' return to the league. What did you guys think about his performance? I thought he looked pretty good out there actually. He was pretty quick with his first step and he found the small creases that were available on several runs. The announcers of course, fixated on the fumble and his final line: 6 carries for 15 yards and 1 fumble, but I thought all things considered he looked encouraging. He was forced out of the game when rookie LB Lawrence Timmons inadvertently stepped on his shoulder while going after the fumble, but I wouldn't imagine that the injury will linger.
  • Speaking of Timmons, nice contributions from him last night. I'm interested to see if he is used next week in coverage packages against the pass-happy Bengals.
  • James Farrior and Larry Foote dominated this game. Honorable mention should go to Tyrone Carter, who tackled extremely well, and Brett Keisel, who continues to have what I believe is his best season as a pro. Farrior and Foote though were fantastic. 11 tackles, 7 assisted tackles, .5 sacks each, and one forced fumble between the two of them. And that's not even counting the countless other times both were able to force Beck into early, errant throws. Most everybody looked good on defense for both teams, but I thought these two guys stood out above the rest.
  • Mr. Huizenga, the Dolphins owner, has to be wondering where the Joey Porter we saw last night has been all year. Big, big night for Joey, and if he can find a way to play at that level for the next several years, maybe the Dolphins will feel they've gotten their money's worth. One of the few entertaining aspects of last night's game was watching Porter and his former teamates interact. After Hines gave Porter a little shake-and-bake over the middle and caught a first-down pass, then flashed a smile that was huge even by Hines' standards, I couldn't help but smile myself.
  • Ike Taylor dropped another INT. Tough, slippery conditions, but we may need Taylor to make that kind of play when we face superior teams. Just a thought.
  • Again, foolish to include this data point as relevant, but special teams play was solid last night. Allen Rossum broke off a nice return that should have led to points, Ted Ginn was contained all night, Sepulveda did his job, and Jeff Reed converted on the one play we absolutely had to have at the end of the game. Real quick, about the play-calling in that last series. First off, we should strike that final sack from the record. I don't think it was entirely unreasonable for Arians to want to punch it in for a score rather than rely on a FG attempt, even though it was a chip-shot. Not sure I like the calls on 1st and 2nd down, but on 3rd down, I imagine that Arians told Ben to take an initial look at what was open, and if nothing was there, to just take the sack. Of course, if his intention was to not rely on the FG and go for the TD, he needs to do a better job of play-calling. If he's going to call two crappy plays on 1st and 2nd down, don't all of a sudden risk disaster on 3rd down. He's been a bit schizophrenic lately for my tastes, and his performance, in my mind, is a bigger concern than the actual linemen themselves. He needs to mask their deficiencies better with his play-calling, and he needs to find a way to stay one step ahead of opposing defensive coordinators. For nearly a month now, we've taken the first punch rather than delivering it.
  • Let's not forget that the Dolphins have been fairly successful running the ball themselves this year. Much has already been made of our line's inability to dominate, but by now, domination shouldn't be expected from this unit. Other than Mahan and Colon, I thought all our linemen had an acceptable game in the run game, including Kendall Simmons, who's been mired in what seems like a season-long slump. Let's see how we do next week against a Bengals team we match up well with in the trenches.
  • I thought Tomlin had a shaky game with his decision making, but as has been said many times already, there hasn't been anything similar to the conditions we saw last night, and even the most seasoned veteran coach might have struggled with situational decision making. It's entirely possible we are forced to play on a similarly awful field in December or January (be it snow, or more rain), so we can only hope we took something from this game in terms of when and where to go for it, as well as what plays work in short-yardage situations on 3rd and 4th down. Here were the scenarios that kept us from putting up any points till the final seconds, even though we seemingly lived inside Dolphins' territory last night:

1)4th and 2 from the Miami 40: We go for it, electing to run Davenport up the middle.  Should we have gone for it at the risk of giving Miami solid field position? I dunno, what do you guys think?

2)4th and 2 from the Miami 26: You obviously can't punt there, but a 44 yard FG attempt on that field? Not so sure about that decision. What really irks me is our 3rd down call: another Najeh Davenport run up the middle for -1 yard.

3) Miami's decision to go for it on 4th and 15 from our 31 yard line and on 4th and 11 from our 25 yard line. Agree or disagree with those decisions?

  • The conditions forced our hand, but I was pleased to see us call more quick-hitting, short passing plays. I was nervous we might be tempted by our success against the Ravens throwing deep (also a sloppy track that night) to try it again last night. We didn't, thank God, or the sack total certainly would have been higher. Nice game by Hines holding onto the ball in traffic. Props to Cedrick Wilson as well for a solid performance with Santonio out of the lineup.
  • From the comments section of the previous post by franz - a HS football coach who undeniably has more experience watching and analyzing football than myself:
Blitzburgh tried to rationalize the sack stats as being equal due to the weather.  The reason the Fins gave up 4 sacks is because they are terrible - they are in fact winless.
Several of you have now said that I've been rationalizing the poor play of this team for several weeks. Partly true, but realize several things first: those of you that read the site last year when we were awful are well aware that I'm more than willing to be critical of this team and organization. This site is intended to be a healthy blend of homerific loyalty/support and analytical objectivity. Please continue to call me out if you feel I am not fulfilling this goal that I myself have set.

First off however, for all of Miami's travails this year, the play of the offensive line hasn't been one of them. Before last night, Miami had surrendered only 17 sacks on the season through 10 games. Even after last night, they're in the middle of the pack in the NFL. We made their line look terrible all night, and I have a hard time believing that they all of a sudden forgot how to pass-protect.  Part of the credit goes to LeBeau, part goes to the field conditions.

Now, as for 'rationalizing' the sacks from last night. 2 sacks through 3 quarters. On that field. Does that really alarm you that badly? Read above or go rewatch the tape of the final play before the FG as well to remind yourself that the 5th and final sack was conceeded by Arians and Ben, not a product of inferior pass protection.

The line is what is: not great by any means, but in my estimation, not horrible either. We're certainly stuck in an ugly three game stretch in which the line has looked horrible, but as I've stated before, there have been prolonged stretches of solid blocking by this group earlier in the season. Defenses have countered, Arians has struggled in his subsequent counter-punch, and all of a sudden we're in a long slump that has left many of us thinking that we're not good enough to get it done. Maybe so, but I still contend that there's enough time (clock's ticking though guys, better make it happen next week) to make the necessary adjustments to give ourselves a shot against the better teams still left on our schedule.

*************

This has been an interesting season up to this point. I know many of you are upset with the coaching, the blocking, and the inability of this team to impose its will on inferior teams. All valid concerns, and unfortunately poor play by the 0-line is one of the few things that is hard to overcome.

But here we are, 8-3, with the prize-fights of our schedule still looming. We have not been bitten too strongly by the injury bug, Big Ben is not compromising our chances with turnovers, and our defense - which you absolutely can not win championships without - has been playing at an elite level for the better part of this year. I appreciate all of you who have joined in the discussion this year. It's been an up-and-down ride thus far, and I, for one, am eagerly (as well as nervously) awaiting to see how the remaining, unwritten chapters will unfold.          

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

heh
Man, sorry for all the rambling lately. I'm into the long-winded posts rather than the cheap, easy short stuff. I wish I could make my points more succintly and quickly, but oh well.

With that, I'm oficially done with this game.

by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 12:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

good post
Very, very sad news about Sean Taylor. I'm in DC and the entire area is crushed. He truly seemed like he was getting his life back in order and was on track to be one hell of a DB, if he wasn't already.

I feel a bit less critical of the Steelers than I did in earlier comments. Beyond the O-line, I don't think we have physical issues in terms of our players having enough athleticism to compete. I really think the problem we have is the fact that we play well enough to win games, and that's it - then we act surprised when bad teams have marquee games against us and make things close. You could arguably say that we haven't played a good football game since the last MNF against Baltimore - the loss was inexcusable and the two wins were way closer than they should've been.

I just want our guys to come out swinging for once. As much as I hate NE (and I do hate NE), credit them with having the tenacity to play hard every game, every down, and treat every game as if it were the crux of the season. Something tells me that there's no laughing off of inferior teams in Foxboro.

by dcfan85 on Nov 27, 2007 1:25 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

thanks for the feedback
I agree, the Pats do come out looking for blood each and every snap. They're a better offensive football team than us, no doubt. I highly doubt guys like Hines Ward and Troy P allow their teammates to laugh off inferior teams though, but it's entirely possible that the coordinators and coaches aren't working hard enough during the week at anticipating the new wrinkles that teams with less talent are throwing at us each week.

by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 1:29 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

nice job blitz
Really appreciate the thought and time you take in your many postings. There are some crazy contributions at times and it must be a trial to maintain a reasonable perspectivve. Your approach is consistent and I don't think you are ''rationalizing'' anything. There is nothing wrong with trying to find the positive aspect of any situation and there were lots of positives Monday.

I don't agree with the notion that the game was useless as an evaluation tool. We better do some evaluating, because it might be exactly the same quagmire next Sunday night. It was a terrible idea to lay new sod over old and the NFL can't be happy about what the conditions did to their primetime product. It was also dangerous for players. Someone in the NFL office might be wondering if the Cincy game should be played at another site and give the team two weeks to send in caterpillars to clear out the bog and put in Fieldturf.

After reading franz's posting on the other thread, I have to say I agree with him on many points but not all of his conclusions. I don't know how Franz came to the conclusion that we can't generate an adequate pass-rush. We did it last night and the only times we have failed to do so this year is when we rush just three and drop back. Our total of 32 sacks is third in the league.

However, Franz was right on in his evalution of play-calling. He was correct in saying that the muck actually allowed for better pass protection for exactly the reasons he noted.. The muck negatied LOS explosion. Run defense up the middle was better for the same reason, in that the O-linemen could not generate any explosion off the snap. I would also agree that Ben is not recognizing some defensive blitz packages. I don't think it was impossible to score TDs in those conditions but at the very least our field position should have resulted in three or four red-zone opportunities and short field goal attempts.. I agree with you about the Miami offensive line actually being a fairly respectable unit. probably better than the Steelers' O-line. The last sack was a dangerous and unnecessary play because Ben allowed it to happen while putting himself at risk of having the ball stripped. Make a short straight drop, try to find someone quickly and then throw it away or fall down in the middle of the field.

On some of your questions, I also thought Williams showed some nice footwork. The question is whether he is able to (or wants to) absorb punishment like he used to..

I thought Miami should have tried a FG on their second attempt. The kicker had basically been allowed a practise attempt on the first try and the distance was not a factor, only the footing. They weren't going to get a first down on fourth-and-long on a short field.

I liked going for it on 4th-and-2 but not running up the middle. Overall we wasted too many plays and seconds trying to run through a bog directly into a wet mass of bodies. The more time we ran off the clock without scoring, the better for Miami. We had some success running off-tackle and Ben was accurate with his passing, so go with that. I also agreed with the FG attempt; if nothing else it gave Reed a run-through of what he needed to do on his second FG attempt. But again, why were we running short yardage right up the middle when Ben has a hot hand and everyone is hanging onto the ball.

by steeler lifer on Nov 27, 2007 1:58 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Cincy game
Does anyone have any idea how quickly they could strip that field down and get some field turf or some artificial surface in there? Can it be done in a week?
"The more violent team will win tonight" - Mike Tomlin.

by cgolden on Nov 27, 2007 2:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no idea
As interesting as steeler lifer's suggestion was, I can't imagine that the Steelers would okay a decision to move the game to Cincy. Perhaps somewhere else in Pittsburgh, but I'm assuming the Univ. of Pitt's stadium wouldn't cut it.

I'll try to do some reading up about it, but my guess is we can get the field in somewhat acceptable shape by next weekend. It's already considered the worst field in the league by most players, so I'm guessing if they can just get it anywhere near an acceptable level, that'll be enough. Dunno, good question.

by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 2:30 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

my two cents
-- Ricky didn't show me anything but with only 6 carries, it really isn't enough to evaluate. He did at least show some heart trying to come back on the field after injurying his shoulder.

-- On the fourth down attempts I agreed with the Steelers decision to go for it but obviously they should have tried some different. Why Heath Miller didn't catch a single pass I'll never understand.

-- I didn't really understand Miami's decisions on fourth down though. If I was the coach I would have tried to pooch punt the ball and pin the Steelers inside the 5 and hope to sack Ben for a safety. I really thought the only way Miami was going to score was a defensive score. I was more scared of a 0-0 tie than the Dolphins putting any points on the board.

"The more violent team will win tonight" - Mike Tomlin.

by cgolden on Nov 27, 2007 2:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No, not in Cincy
By another site, I didn't mean Cincy. There's no way that would happen. In fact I doubt that the site will be changed but there's no question the field was unacceptable and that the NFL and ESPN have every right to come down hard on Steelers management.  They will want to know what options there are. There has to be a minimum standard for playing conditions.

On the positive side, having played one game now gives us a real homebog advantage. We'll get used to it and every team that comes in will be saying, ''You have got to be kidding.''

by steeler lifer on Nov 27, 2007 3:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

oh my bad
Yeah after rereading your comment, I realize I misinterpreted. My bad.

Yeah, I mean I want to watch quality football, and it's hard to play quality football on that kind of field. That said, we're 6-0 at home, so...

by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 3:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Going for it on 4th down
On the 4th and 2 from Miami's 40, apparently they don't realize we don't have a legitimate short yardage back anymore, unless Russel or Davis are ready.  That's probably why they tried to kick from the Miami 26.  I agree with you that the call of Najeh up the middle for -1 was bad.  

As far as Miami's choices, they really made no sense.  Why go for it on 4th and long in your own territory in a tie ballgame?

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Nov 27, 2007 7:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Why not?
They were 0-10, what could they lose? This is kind of what makes these teams "dangerous" to us. We can't afford a loss, so we would never have risked that kind of call. They've lost ALL their games. Probably wanted to try and get a spark.

Either way, I'm with you - probably would've just punted. 0-10 or not, the score was still 0-0.

by Cotter on Nov 28, 2007 10:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There are risks
and then there's going for it on 4th and long from around or inside your own 30.  Sure, winless teams will take risks they normally wouldn't, but those two should have cost them two TDs given up, if we had been able to do anything with those drives.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Nov 28, 2007 11:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And besides
it was still 0-0.  Not like they had given up points all day.  Their D had been playing us well.  It just makes sense to make the field as long as possible.  Unless they were afraid of a bad snap on the punt . . .

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Nov 28, 2007 11:18 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There were
several Najeh runs that I hated.  I'm wondering if the coaches just didn't have faith in Willie's flashy style of running in that quagmire to get the 'tough' yards.  Seems to me that in those conditions, all the yards were tough.

by steelerark on Nov 27, 2007 7:22 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Quick thought on Najeh
For his size he's never really been a "power back."  He's shifty and I think a great 3rd down back.  He does great things in space and once he gets that load going people try to arm tackle and it doesn't work.  But when he's coming from 7 yards deep on a straight dive he gets no push.  

I like the 4th decisions, not the calls, for the steelers, not so much for 'Fins.  

by Chicago Steeler on Nov 27, 2007 9:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

najeh
I may very well stand alone on this one, and I of course could be assesing his abilities incorrectly and irrationaly, but I just don't see it with this guy. I'd have to watch some tape, but I dont think he's any good picking up blocks, and it seems to me he is almost always hesitant on where he wants to go.

Many have pointed out that the line never gives him much to work with, but they shouldnt have to. He's in the game to rumble for 1-3 yard gains in short yardage situations. If the line were clearing gigantic holes, thered be no need for him in the first place, Parker could carry it.

Anybody ever heard of Javorski Lane at Texas A&M? Seen him play? He's a load and almost always carries guys with him for an extra yard or two. granted that's college ball where the LBs and defensive tackles are far worse, but I want the Steelers to have that type of rumbling force if we're going to insist on plowing up the gut on short yardage situations.

by Blitzburgh on Nov 27, 2007 11:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

power back
It would be really nice to get the J-Train. He's a junior right?

There are power backs in that mold that the Steelers could look at if they really want to pound the ball on 3 and shorts. I doubt the Lions would ask much for TJ Duckett's services.

"The more violent team will win tonight" - Mike Tomlin.

by cgolden on Nov 28, 2007 8:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Duckett
He's also not the best short yardage back for his size.  He may have improved, but when he was here in Atlanta, he always ran too high for a goal-line/short yardage back.  I was really hoping we'd draft Lendale White last year.  He dropped to the second round, and I thought he'd be a good fit with FWP, much like his work with Reggie Bush at USC.

I do hope we make a move that helps out there, though.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Nov 28, 2007 10:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Javorski Lane, hell yeah
Dude, I know exactly what you're talking about. I tried to tell my buddy last year that Javorski Lane should be a Steeler. I mean there's no telling what kind of Pro prospect he'll be, but really there never is any definitive way to know.

Najeh shows flashes of his ability. But for the role we need him to play, we need consistency, reliability (and blocking). I'm not ready to let him go just yet, but I'm certainly not sold on him either.

Sometimes I think I'd be more confident with Verron Haynes back there on 3rd down...sometimes.

by Cotter on Nov 28, 2007 10:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Start posting about the Steelers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Comcast NFL RedZone Moments from SB Nation

Music City Miracles
Tennessee Titans Red Zone Report
Bleeding Green Nation
Comcast NFL Red Zone stat of the week - Something doesn't have to give
Niners Nation
49ers Red Zone numbers: How effective are they?

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Steelers_small
A Day In The Life Of Punxsutawney Polamalu!
Small
Four Things I Learned From the Super Bowl
Bobby_ray_small
NFL Opinions - wanted or not
Small
BTSC 2010 NFL Mock Drafts : Updated 02/06 (4 round edition)
Steelers_brushback_l_small
Football-related Pet Peeves

Recent FanPosts

Small
Vasher to the Black and Gold ???
Small
Steelers add kicking depth, possible kick off specialist.
Small
Peyton Manning and the post season
Small
Alternate Theory: Draft version, What If?
Rayray_small
SB Weekend Wrap from Miami - Football Stuff
200px-siickeywoods_small
New friends and foes in the AFCN
Rayray_small
SB Weekend Wrap from Miami - Parties
Gildon002_small
Lame ass Fans ..
Small
What does your Mock Draft look like?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: I promise
Acme Packing Company
Replay: Tracy Porter's Super Bowl INT Return
Revenge Of The Birds
Arizona Cardinals Weekly Flock

SPONSORS


Site Founder & Editor

Me2_small Blitzburgh

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bringing You Your Daily Six Pack

Plainview_small drinkyourmilkshake