Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

State of the Steelers' Roster: Offensive Tackle

Today's breakdown starts a three part series on the OL and we decided to break up the offensive line considering all of the concerns and needs with this unit. I'll also add that offensive line is possibly the hardest area to breakdown because rarely do we watch a game and track the play of a guard or tackle so feel free to add any insight that you have on these guys (especially if one of them was your adopted Steeler).

Marvel Smith

Age and Contract Status: 29 years old (8/6/78), signed through 2008 with a cap hit of $6.6 million

2007 Analysis: Marvel was the exception to an otherwise healthy offensive line as he developed back problems that caused him to miss the final four games of the season. Smith was his usual solid yet unspectacular self. He is solid at both run blocking and passing protection but doesn't blow anybody away.

2008 Outlook: As with most of the offensive line, 2008 is a big year for Smith. He won't be extended this off season, so he'll be playing for a contract all season long. A great season and he might break the bank considering he'll be a left tackle with 8 years of experience, over 120 career starts and a Super Bowl ring but another injury plagued season will raise plenty of question marks. For a man of his age and size (6'5 321 lbs) back problems are normally not a good sign. That combined with the fact that for the first time in his career Smith will have to play with someone new next to him and there's plenty of reason to worry about the future.

Willie Colon

Age and Contract Status: 24 years old (4/9/83), signed through 2008 with a cap hit of $540K

2007 Analysis: To say Colon had a rough first year as a starter would probably be an understatement, but since he was my `adopted Steeler', I saw a lot promise in his play. Colon is very young and is playing at a position that most scouts thought he couldn't/wouldn't play at this level. Colon is slightly better at run blocking than pass blocking and he struggled at times against speed rushers. He did at times flash the aggressive, mean streak in the run game that offensive line coaches covet.

2008 Outlook: I'm going to go out on a bit of a limb and say right now, that Colon will be a Steelers' lineman for years to come. I think we'll see him at guard in 2008 and I think that he's better suited to play that position. If he plays inside he shouldn't have to worry about the lack of quickness that plagued him on the outside and he can use his `phone booth' skills to excel at guard. He'll be a restricted free agent at the end of next season but by that time he have logged over 30 starts and should be in line for a long term contract. If Colon can get a bit stronger, he can become a better than average guard in this league. The promise he showed in 2007 is one of the reasons that rumors circulate that Simmons might move to center.  

Trai Essex

Age and Contract Status: 25 years old (12/5/82), Restricted Free Agent

2007 Analysis: Thanks to Marvel Smith's and Max Starks injuries, Essex was able to start a couple of games and get the chance to audition for his job. In the couple of games that Essex saw action he wasn't a huge liability and seemed to live up to his scouting report. He is decent to good in pass coverage but can't seem to get any push in the running game.

2008 Outlook: Essex will be back in 2008 on a one year tender and it'll be interesting to see if the Steelers try to retain his services after that. He'll be an unrestricted free agent next year, just like Starks is this year. He has value as a backup considering he's at least average in one area (pass protection), although I'm sure Essex sees himself as more than a career backup. Given his age it's still a possibility that he could develop into a quality starter but he'll have to get stronger to be any force in the running game.

Max Starks

Age and Contract Status: 26 years old (1/10/82), Unrestricted Free Agent

2007 Analysis: After starting the season riding the pine and only getting on the field as a third tight end near the goal line, Starks stepped in for the injured Marvel Smith and played well enough to expect a decent payday this off season. Starks caught a perfect storm (yea that was a pathetic attempt at humor) considering that 2 of his four starts were in the slop at Heinz Field against Miami and Cincinnati. The book on Starks is that he struggles with speed rushers but is an absolute mauler in the running game so those games suited his abilities very well.

2008 Analysis: I don't think it's a stretch to say it would be a shock if Starks were here in 2008. It was surprising when Colon beat him out for the starting job and we've debated the thought process behind that but the fact remains that if the Steelers wanted Starks back, they've had a year to work out a deal. He'll probably get paid well in the off season and some other team's quarterback will be blasted from the blind side.

Other roster guys who were signed during the year or spent time on the practice squad:

Jason Capizzi: The sheer size (6'9 315lbs) of this kid intrigued most of us when he was signed during this season and he's still very young (22 yrs old) so he has some time to develop. It would probably be a success if he could break camp as the back up right tackle.
Jeremy Parquet: To be honest I don't know much about Parquet, and if you go to the Steelers official website, there isn't even a picture or bio. Here's the story we posted when he was promoted to the active roster and it also includes some background on Capizzi. Parquet isn't nearly as young (almost 26 yrs old) as Capizzi, so I'm not sure he'll be around for long.

Needs: If you watched the Steelers at all in 2007, you know they need help on the offensive line, and when you look at the contract status of each of these guys it doesn't do much to ease your concerns. It's possible that every one of these guys could be gone after next season. To try and project this unit, Starks is gone this off season, Smith is gone after the '08 season, and Colon is moved to guard. That leaves only Essex and I'm not sure he'll ever be a reliable starter in this league. That's not a pretty picture and is all the more reason why the Steelers need an offensive line intensive draft this year. They'll likely need a guy who can start on right tackle from day one for 2007 and a guy who can start at left tackle in 2008.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

OL
I think it's pretty clear that Colon shouldn't play tackle anymore.  If we moved him to guard or center, I think he'd be solid in both run and pass protection.  I, for one, hope we can resign Starks.  He was terrible in '06, but he lost weight last offseason and looked a lot better.  I still don't think he's the solution on the left, but he could be/has been a good starting RT.  If we don't resign him, we'll have to either sign someone else (which worked out so well last year), or hope we can draft a RT that can start immediately.  If we sign Starks, we can draft a pure LT prospect now, possibly after the first round, and give him a year to develop.  If he doesn't look like starter material, then we can draft out of need next year.

This gives us a better chance of drafting a guard who can compete inside and some DL's who can help right away, or just the best player available who isn't a QB or TE.

by BadMaafala on Feb 19, 2008 11:46 AM EST reply actions  

ol
i think our offensive line was destroyed last season by the loss of Russ Grimm and the outspoken antics of Alan Faneca, and Ben is the one who felt it the most.if you take a look around the league....our offensive line physically can be great...but i believe continuity is the main need for success.we need to find our 5 starters early and stick with them.let them gel into a 5 headed monster.the sooner the better.we dont need another year of contracts in the air....our players need to be focused on their jobs....not what is going to happen to them next season.all this bouncing around from position to position...i know some was due to injury....needs to be settled asap.my point is just continuity....i think that is the biggest factor in a good line.

by zenhas12strings on Feb 19, 2008 1:37 PM EST reply actions  

The intrigue of the NFL...
Here we are in the offseason in the aftermath of our worst offensive line performance in memory, and my memory goes back a long way.  Two of our guys, 40% of the line, are free agents.  It's a foregone conclusion that we are not going to re-sign them, which means that other teams will.

So the team that needs those guys the most, US, will not pay as much as other teams will.  It's really hard to explain that to my 12-year-old:

"Dad, you say our offensive line is really shaky, yet we are willing to let guys leave and sign with teams who can't possibly need them as badly as we do.  Please explain."

"Well, you see, honey..."

by maryrose on Feb 19, 2008 10:34 PM EST reply actions  

hehe
Well, I would say to that maryrose: if you ran a business and had a problem with absenteeism because your current employees didnt show up regularly enough, would you keep them aruond, even though that would, in the short term at least, exacerbate the problem?

Is kinda hard to swallow the Faneca loss, but if it was a strictly rational market rather than one where overzealous short-term owners skewed things for the rest of the group, than we might not be in this connondrum that's so difficult to explain to your kid :)

by Michael Bean on Feb 19, 2008 11:13 PM EST reply actions  

Overpaying owners
Yeah, we might still have Randle El if not for overpaying owners.  We probably wouldn't have lost Neil O'Donnell, either, though.

by WolfpackSteelersFan on Feb 20, 2008 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Starks
I agree with you golden on Starks not likely to come back next year and on Colon's best position probably being guard. If you look at the guys currently on our roster, who is the most likely to be starting for this team for the opening kickoff of the 2009 season? I would say Willie Colon at right guard. I don't think any other guy on our team will be starting on the O-line by that time.  Possibly Simmons at LG, but I hope not. Smith will be gone and some combination of Mahan, Essex, Capizzi and Stapleton might be around as backups.

I wouldn't mind having Starks around for a couple of years  He could take some of the pressure off our top draft pick and provide insurance for one year, and he might start in 09 after Smith leaves. But why would he want to come back? It's not the Steelers decision, it's Starks' decision.Why would any FA come back to a team that has already demoted him? This is his opportunity to make his own decision where to play. The guy wants a chance to start and he will sign a contract with someone that guarantees he will start so long as he doesn't screw it up.

As of March 1, the Steelers depth chart will show Smith and Colon as the starters at OT. There will be a hole behind them that was formerly held by Starks. The Steelers will fill that hole with a draft pick, and pay that guy a fraction of what it would have cost to bring Starks back.  By mid-season, if not earlier, that draft pick will be starting at RT and possibly playing as well as Starks is for whatever team he is on.

by steeler lifer on Feb 19, 2008 11:14 PM EST reply actions  

Chris K
I know we don't talk about him much and I'll cover this hopefully later today or early tomorrow in the OG breakdown but Chris K will be a starter in 09.
"You know who I want? William Wallace. That's who I'm looking for" - Bengals defensive line coach when asked who he was looking for in the draft

by cgolden on Feb 20, 2008 8:12 AM EST up reply actions  

kemo
Yes, forgot about Kemo (Doh!!!) so thanks for the reminder. But I'm not convinced he can do the job. Let's not forget he was a sixth-rounder who's been given few opportunities to play, perhaps for a reason. If they re-sign him which it sounds like they might do, then he could very well start at LG. If they extend him one year and draft G Brandon Albert, then he probably won't start in 08 and his future status will depend on the 3-5 OL we draft over the next two seasons. We have a lot of bodies on the OL but very little talent.

by steeler lifer on Feb 20, 2008 10:57 AM EST reply actions  

agreed
His future as well as a couple other current OL depend on how not only this draft but the next couple go.
"You know who I want? William Wallace. That's who I'm looking for" - Bengals defensive line coach when asked who he was looking for in the draft

by cgolden on Feb 20, 2008 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

starks the key
Sign him, and you have less pressure to take an ot in the first round.  He may also be put into a competition with Smith for the LT position since Smith will be gone after 08.  I agree that any of the five of these parts is going to affect the others.  Consider too that in the last five years or so the only back to back seasons we entered with the same five starters penciled in were 2005 and 2006 (Smith, Faneca, Hartings, Simmons, Starks).  

by nerves of steel on Feb 20, 2008 2:10 PM EST reply actions  

yeah
We gotta resign Starks. To me, he showed enough against Justin Smith and Jayson Taylor to deserve it, and as i mentioned in the guards post, perhaps we'll be able to retain him at a reasonable price due to his overall lackluster year.

But with M. Smith's back problems and age, I don't think we can afford to let him go.

by Michael Bean on Feb 20, 2008 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Starks
Starks hasn't done anything to not deserve the tag has he? I can understand letting Faneca go get his money but Starks will have plenty of time to go get paid later. I'd be for franshising him although 7 million would be a hefty price to pay for him (he might actually like that pay day for one year).
"You know who I want? William Wallace. That's who I'm looking for" - Bengals defensive line coach when asked who he was looking for in the draft

by cgolden on Feb 20, 2008 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

oh no
starks cant be franchised. he's not worth nearly that kind of money. I think we should try to lock him into a 3-4 year deal.

by Michael Bean on Feb 20, 2008 5:56 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to BTSC, a blog dedicated to the SIX-time world champion Steelers.

"Thoughtful discussion with a sense of history."

Art Rooney Jr.

"Level-headed thinking." Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Franco72_small
The Last Sunday
Small
Joe Greene on Steelers Offense Under BA
Small
Homer reps BTSC and Steeler Nation on Washington Post Front Page
Small
Your Super Bowl Hate Guide
Steeler_nation_small
University of BTSC: Masters of Science degree in Steelerology Required Core Course 201: Using Quantum Mechanics to Understand the Baltimore Ravens (and their Fans).

Recent FanPosts

Steel-ball-logo-poster_small
Knowing Your Guards: A look at the 2012 Prospects (Updated 2/11/12)
Rodthreerivers_small
Report: Steelers Don't Want Ward
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2008 Draft
Small
My Top 11 Prospects for our First Round Pick
Small
Ike Taylor restructures, over 18 million in cap space created so far this offseason
Small
Analyzing the Steelers 2009 Draft
Small
6 Round NFL Mock Draft
Steeler_small
Steelers Cut Their Salary Problem in Half
Small
Woodley restructures contract
Bonek_small
Haley's Day One in Steelers office

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Terrible Towel Talk

Listen to internet radio with Michael Bean on Blog Talk Radio


Site Founder & Editor

Imag0299_small Michael Bean

Steelers Historian

Steeler_small maryrose

Bison_small Neal Coolong

Contributing Authors

Small Ivan Cole (RickVa)

Franco72_small 5020

Btsc_head_shot_small Rebecca Rollett

Small big_jay71

Stogs_small John Stephens

178896_499126548441_596563441_5939410_7960015_n_small Anthony Defeo